Hi Johannes,
Thanks for your clarifications.
I was not aware of the request to add a new column in
draft-ietf-ipsecme-dh-checks and since I did not see the column yet I could
not understand.
So everything look OK for me now.
Roni Even


-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Merkle [

mailto:johannes.merkle

 at secunet.com] 
Sent: 02 April, 2013 4:22 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool.all at tools.ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org;
Dan Harkins
Subject: Re: GenART LC review of draft-merkle-ikev2-ke-brainpool-03

Hi,

> 1.       In table 1 the Transform ID are specified as TBD1 to TBD4. I
noticed that IANA have already assigned values
> 27-30. So they should be specified. If not it will be good to ask the RFC
editor before publication to update the table.
> I saw that you only asked IANA to allocate values.

I'll do so in the next version if it is not done by the RFC editor.


> 
> 2.       In the IANA section I did not understand to which table you are
referring to "For the new entries in the table
> of the Transform Type 4 repository, a reference to Section 2.3 of 
> [IKE_DH_Req] shall be included in the column named "Recipient Tests"
indicating the required checks for the other peer's Diffie-Hellman public
keys."
> 
This refers to the Table Transform Type 4 - Diffie-Hellman Group Transform
IDs, see


http://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xml#ikev2-


parameters-8

[IKE_DH_Req] requests from IANA to add a new column (named "Recipient
Tests") to that Table. We request IANA to add in that new column a a
reference to Section 2.3 of [IKE_DH_Req].

This request has been correctly understood by IANA, see email below.

Best regards,
Johannes