I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  

draft-ietf-

v6ops-host-addr-availability

-05

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016–3-8

IETF LC End Date: 2016–3-9

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC

.

 

 

 

Major issues:

 

 

Minor issues:

 

 Nits/editorial comments:

Small question: In section 6 last bullet “While [RFC3633] assumes that the DHCPv6 client is a router, DHCPv6 PD itself does not require that the client forward IPv6 packets not addressed to itself, and thus does not require that the client be an IPv6 router as defined in [RFC2460].”

Is this a good practice to recommend?

Also I understand that in the here the recommendation is that all IPv6 packets will be addressed to the DHCPv6 client (not a router) and this is why he will not forward them.