I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2017-09-05 IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-14 IESG Telechat date: 2017-09-14 Summary: The document is ready with nits to be published as informational RFC Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. I think it will be better to have the introduction as section 1 and the terminology as section 2 2.In section 3.1 in "open" I did not understand the following sentence "more than TCP's maximum segment size (minus options used in the SYN)" 3. in section 6 "The views expressed are solely those of the author(s)" suggest removing the sentence since this document expresses the views of the WG. 4. A general readability comment when describing primitives in pass 2 the structure is PRIMITIVENAME.PROTOCOL: Pass 1 primitive / event: Parameters: Returns: Comments: but it will be easier to read if there is for example a line space between the paragraphs. look for example at CONNECT.TCP: it is difficult to see where parameters finish and comment starts