Greetings:

This is an ops-dir review  that looks at the operational aspects of any draft. 

Overall: Thank you for a clear and well-written document. 

This draft is well written and clear.    One minor editorial nitty-nit.
One personal plea from the IDR  co-chair(WG that maintains BGP), 
and co-author of BGP (RFC4771).   

Personal plea: 
You've clear stated the BGP issue up front. 
 TCP MD5 is bad (due to privacy issues) and TCP-AO 
is not deployed..  Has the TAPs given any thought to 
what might be  a replacement that could utilize some of the modern 
TCP.   Would any of your co-authors be willing to chat about 
this issue? 

The  very minor editorial nitty-nit. 
Would you please check the order of the items in 
the pre-shared key import (PSKI) [p. 13-14] 
to see that it is the same order as the table.