I was asked to review the 08 version but my comments from 07 were not addressed and I did not see any response. So I am resending my previous review As for making it a standard track document, I am not sure since it looks to me as an overview and not standard. And there is no normative language in the document. Roni Even   I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-repute-model-07 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2013–8–20 IETF LC End Date: 2013-8–29 IESG Telechat date:   Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.     Major issues: Minor issues: I was wondering why the “Further Discussion” section 9.3 is part of the security section. I think it should be a separate section. Nits/editorial comments: Section 3 the end of 2 nd paragraph “mechansisms” to “mechanisms”