I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-quic-transport-33. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION.

There is a lot here and the document seems well put together and thorough.

I didn’t notice any major or even minor issues with the document – it looks like it has had lots of careful review to date. (The one minor typo is “version” is misspelled as “verion” in the “DO NOT DEPLOY THIS VERSION OF QUIC” text, which will be removed anyway.)

I also reviewed the document for the items listed at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/int/wiki/IntAreaIssues and the document fully supports IPv6 (it support both IPv4 and IPv6 equally), deal with MTU and fragmentation properly, and has no other issues listed at this link.

Therefore, I think this document is ready to advance.

-	Bernie Volz