I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2017-08-13
IETF LC End Date: 2017-08-24
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-31

Summary: The document is ready for publication as standard track RFC

I read all the document and also did a compare with RFC6006 to look at the changes.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: 

1. In section 4.2 I am not sure why is this sentence there, is it for the current yang document or for a future one. Why have it at all?-"The PCEP YANG module [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] can be extended to also include the P2MP related parameters."