I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-vc2hq-05 Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review Date: 2018-05-04 IETF LC End Date: 2018-05-16 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready. A well written and comprehensible document. Thanks! I spotted a few minor nits noted below. Major issues:\ None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: Abstract, S1 and VC2 reference: Expand SMPTE (Soc of Motion Picture and Television Engineers). s4, para 3:  This para would probably be more helpful as a set of six bulleted entries for the six different packet formats, and omitting the 'one which carries' from each. s4.1, Sequecnce Number: s/extneded/extended/ ss4.1, 4.2: The encoding and bit ordering of the numeric fields should be specified (presumably this can be covered by a single statement that they are all unsigned integers encoded in Network Byte Order.). s4.4, third bullet: s/Hight/High/ s6.1, last para: Presumably this is left over from the template and should be removed. s8, para 1: s/This responsibility lays on anyone/This responsibility lies with anyone/