Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​ http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document:draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04 Reviewer: Geoff Huston Review Date: 16 Aug 2016 IETF LC End Date: ? Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Comments: I am not a subject matter expert on ICCP and PW OAM signalling, but within the limitations of my lack of subject matter expertise found the document clear in intent, and the description of the four proposed ICC RG parameter types to be clearly documented. I found the document clearly readable both in terms of the introductory motivational text and the proposed parameter types to be used by ICCP. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found. Nits: There are some quibbles over the use of commas, but I'll leave this to the RFC Editor when they apply style guidelines to the document regards, Geoff Huston