I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:  draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2014–2-24 IETF LC End Date: 2014–3-3 IESG Telechat date:   Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Standard track RFC .     Major issues:   Minor issues: 1.   In section 3.2 (a):  I noticed that the policy to update the registry according  to section 5 is standard action so it should be the same here since this is an update to the registry.     Nits/editorial comments: In section 3 last sentence “This answer to this” should be “The ..” In section 3.2 item c you have “for for”