I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-15 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: Feb-04-2015 IETF LC End Date: Unknown IESG Telechat date: Feb-05-2015 This document is ready as a Proposed Standard. Major: 0 Minor: 1 Nits: 1 Minor: 1 1/ In Section 3, it appears that the second paragraph ("This rule ... updated rule:") is modifying rfc5036 to use the new text given below the quoted paragraph. However, I am not sure whether this is normative update or simply a suggestion. In the second paragraph, the authors write that, "Hence, it is reasonable to say ..." What does "reasonable" mean? Does it mean that rfc5036 is updated authoritatively with the suggested text or simply that rfc5036 text need not be updated but the text in this draft should be considered. Nits: 1/ I am not sure what portions of this draft update rfc6720... Perhaps item (8) in Section 1, but am not sure. Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani at alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq