I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-isis-tlv-codepoints-00 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 20-Jul-2014 IETF LC End Date: 25-Jul-2014 IESG Telechat date: 7-Aug-2014 Summary: Basically ready for publication, but with process nits for the group and the IESG to consider Thanks for assembling such a clearly written document. The shepherd writeup should have discussed _why_ this document is intended for Proposed Standard. There is no protocol definition here, and nothing to progress on the standards ladder. This is, instead, primarily defining process. Why isn't this being progressed as a BCP? Should this Update any of the RFCs that previously defined these registries?