I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-farrresnickel-harassment-05 Reviewer: Tom Taylor Review Date: 2015/02/02 IETF LC End Date:2015/02/13 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is ready to go with minor editorial issues. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: The Ombudsteam is taken for granted from Section 2 onwards. It would be nice to mention in the Introduction that the IESG mentioned Ombudspersons in its statement of anti-harassment policy [1], but did not define the procedures under which the Ombudsteam would be constituted and under which they would operate. This document remedies that lack. Reference URIs [1] and [2] are identical. Should one be removed? Presumably the Ombudsteam web site will be set up upon approval of this document -- it does not exist at the moment. Section 4.1, first paragraph, fourth line: s/objection/objections/