From nobody Thu Sep 4 05:51:49 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E66A1A8893 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:51:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.132 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, LONGWORDS=2.035, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DzMQ5Kywynyb for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05B941A889D for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 05:51:43 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhELAFBfCFTGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABZgkcjI1Nbrz0GBaArAYEGFneEBQEBAxIbXgEMCRVWJgEEGxqIIAGXfoRloBAYhXyJIINngR0FkT6TEI1Ag2GCNIEHAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,465,1406606400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="81068557" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 04 Sep 2014 08:51:42 -0400 X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 04 Sep 2014 08:51:42 -0400 Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:51:41 +0200 From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: xrblock Thread-Topic: meeting at IETF-91 Thread-Index: Ac/IPvXVp1BV2jCTQOiCJVNTo77+kA== Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:51:41 +0000 Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0AZFFEXMB04globa_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/YlfdXh4MIl6dEViaPsNUCzoBAvI Subject: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:51:47 -0000 --_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0AZFFEXMB04globa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, It's time (already!) to submit a request for a meeting slot at IETF-91. Should we ask for one session of one hour - as at IETF-90? The current list of conflicts includes: trill siprec rtcweb raiarea payload opsawg opsarea netmod netconf mmusic lm= ap ippm insipid codec bmwg bfcpbis avtext avtcore tsvarea sacm alto spring = pce mpls i2rs idr Are there other conflicts to avoid? Other special requests? Different propo= sals? Thanks and Regards, Dan --_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0AZFFEXMB04globa_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

It’s time (already!) to submit a request for a= meeting slot at IETF-91.

 

Should we ask for one session of one hour – as= at IETF-90?

 

The current list of conflicts includes: <= /p>

 

trill siprec rtcweb raiarea payload opsawg opsarea n= etmod netconf mmusic lmap ippm insipid codec bmwg bfcpbis avtext avtcore ts= varea sacm alto spring pce mpls i2rs idr

 

Are there other conflicts to avoid? Other special re= quests? Different proposals?

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Dan

 

--_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0AZFFEXMB04globa_-- From nobody Thu Sep 4 20:59:53 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F341A03DF for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:59:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.035 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, LONGWORDS=2.035, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pKcvaETHTev for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DD51A03DE for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uq10so145323igb.2 for ; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:59:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mtaW+KrNQN8A+Se5b9XMwVoxdsfsz4uja1q6s/l5Kjw=; b=MesqtSBh+6C7r2VtEB3rsZdg9eHy2GwGxMrx1PAVKkiXxUY6bAlUmxxvDmCqJ4pUnB eSoke1tOVlXWSom1CaXrzWSX1EpCVSK0/+/9ZCZ37Ta/9IglEg507aoY2MUSO8ZEeLq9 9ZJ6pxRJA2e/ECaBGecFSfU1hk/Jn++FvcJPxpTFQKDnPp8gErHCduyWtYzqLiNBIAxr EYADyCXy7+kpL8dp3vrR8ysTAGPDsBQ+rZzKhvcUQArxxtfDxwkQpiF1Ygv7lVdyIu7G 2J9UWGKQ74oNN/xkRNLUpf6RJ9cAEspGj8qZ0Swm7WBwd+wYFX2uDZwsjHqEitLqvvIs ctTA== X-Received: by 10.50.33.16 with SMTP id n16mr514508igi.15.1409889587508; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 20:59:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.128.108 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:59:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> From: Varun Singh Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 06:59:27 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/lO0T85oUKX-tozVi-gWE05vFrCw Cc: xrblock Subject: Re: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:59:51 -0000 Hi all, It would certainly be useful to have a session. Harald and I are putting together a W3C contribution to move the statsAPI forward based on the information in the w3c wiki. Discussion around the xrblock-rtcweb draft would be important within that context. Cheers, Varun On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) w= rote: > Hi, > > > > It=E2=80=99s time (already!) to submit a request for a meeting slot at IE= TF-91. > > > > Should we ask for one session of one hour =E2=80=93 as at IETF-90? > > > > The current list of conflicts includes: > > > > trill siprec rtcweb raiarea payload opsawg opsarea netmod netconf mmusic > lmap ippm insipid codec bmwg bfcpbis avtext avtcore tsvarea sacm alto spr= ing > pce mpls i2rs idr > > > > Are there other conflicts to avoid? Other special requests? Different > proposals? > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > > > Dan > > > > > _______________________________________________ > xrblock mailing list > xrblock@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock > --=20 http://www.netlab.tkk.fi/~varun/ From nobody Thu Sep 4 22:42:21 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933E01A0414 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:42:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.869 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JS-Hrc0ynnNW for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48C41A0413 for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BME94935; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 05:42:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 06:42:14 +0100 Received: from NKGEML501-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.209]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:42:08 +0800 From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" To: Varun Singh , "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" Thread-Topic: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 Thread-Index: Ac/IPvXVp1BV2jCTQOiCJVNTo77+kAAO8VqAABQfaDA= Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:42:07 +0000 Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB8621872D@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8868C0@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.138.41.144] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/wwQC1abFosXKQX1plRZozNMo5HY Cc: xrblock Subject: Re: [xrblock] meeting at IETF-91 X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 05:42:19 -0000 SSBjb25jdXIgd2l0aCBWYXJ1bi4gQmVzaWRlcywgSSBhbHNvIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8gZGlzY3Vz cyB0aGUgdmlkZW8gbG9zcyBjb25jZWFsbWVudCBkcmFmdCB3aGljaCBnb3Qgc29tZSBpbnRlcmVz dHMgaW4gbGFzdCBtZWV0aW5nLg0KDQpCUiwNClJhY2hlbA0KDQo+IC0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVz c2FnZS0tLS0tDQo+IEZyb206IHhyYmxvY2sgW21haWx0bzp4cmJsb2NrLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBWYXJ1biBTaW5naA0KPiBTZW50OiBGcmlkYXksIFNlcHRlbWJlciAw NSwgMjAxNCAxMTo1OSBBTQ0KPiBUbzogUm9tYXNjYW51LCBEYW4gKERhbikNCj4gQ2M6IHhyYmxv Y2sNCj4gU3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFt4cmJsb2NrXSBtZWV0aW5nIGF0IElFVEYtOTENCj4gDQo+IEhp IGFsbCwNCj4gDQo+IEl0IHdvdWxkIGNlcnRhaW5seSBiZSB1c2VmdWwgdG8gaGF2ZSBhIHNlc3Np b24uIEhhcmFsZCBhbmQgSSBhcmUgcHV0dGluZyB0b2dldGhlcg0KPiBhIFczQyBjb250cmlidXRp b24gdG8gbW92ZSB0aGUgc3RhdHNBUEkgZm9yd2FyZCBiYXNlZCBvbiB0aGUgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24g aW4NCj4gdGhlIHczYyB3aWtpLiBEaXNjdXNzaW9uIGFyb3VuZCB0aGUgeHJibG9jay1ydGN3ZWIg ZHJhZnQgd291bGQgYmUgaW1wb3J0YW50DQo+IHdpdGhpbiB0aGF0IGNvbnRleHQuDQo+IA0KPiBD aGVlcnMsDQo+IFZhcnVuDQo+IA0KPiBPbiBUaHUsIFNlcCA0LCAyMDE0IGF0IDM6NTEgUE0sIFJv bWFzY2FudSwgRGFuIChEYW4pDQo+IDxkcm9tYXNjYUBhdmF5YS5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0KPiA+IEhp LA0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IEl04oCZcyB0aW1lIChhbHJlYWR5ISkgdG8gc3VibWl0IGEg cmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgYSBtZWV0aW5nIHNsb3QgYXQgSUVURi05MS4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4g PiBTaG91bGQgd2UgYXNrIGZvciBvbmUgc2Vzc2lvbiBvZiBvbmUgaG91ciDigJMgYXMgYXQgSUVU Ri05MD8NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPiBUaGUgY3VycmVudCBsaXN0IG9mIGNvbmZsaWN0cyBp bmNsdWRlczoNCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPiB0cmlsbCBzaXByZWMgcnRjd2ViIHJhaWFyZWEg cGF5bG9hZCBvcHNhd2cgb3BzYXJlYSBuZXRtb2QgbmV0Y29uZg0KPiA+IG1tdXNpYyBsbWFwIGlw cG0gaW5zaXBpZCBjb2RlYyBibXdnIGJmY3BiaXMgYXZ0ZXh0IGF2dGNvcmUgdHN2YXJlYQ0KPiA+ IHNhY20gYWx0byBzcHJpbmcgcGNlIG1wbHMgaTJycyBpZHINCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPiBB cmUgdGhlcmUgb3RoZXIgY29uZmxpY3RzIHRvIGF2b2lkPyBPdGhlciBzcGVjaWFsIHJlcXVlc3Rz PyBEaWZmZXJlbnQNCj4gPiBwcm9wb3NhbHM/DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ID4gVGhhbmtzIGFu ZCBSZWdhcmRzLA0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+IERhbg0KPiA+DQo+ID4NCj4gPg0KPiA+DQo+ ID4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gPiB4 cmJsb2NrIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPiA+IHhyYmxvY2tAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gPiBodHRwczovL3d3 dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hyYmxvY2sNCj4gPg0KPiANCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAt LQ0KPiBodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm5ldGxhYi50a2suZmkvfnZhcnVuLw0KPiANCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4geHJibG9jayBtYWlsaW5nIGxp c3QNCj4geHJibG9ja0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xp c3RpbmZvL3hyYmxvY2sNCg== From nobody Sun Sep 28 13:21:03 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63241A1BE9 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:21:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.685 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.685 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I65Jb2LYwWLU for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com [135.11.29.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5121A1BE7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:21:00 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvAKAD1tKFTGmAcV/2dsb2JhbABggkgjI1NbthIGm0kCexYBAXqEBQEBAxILEF4BDAkVViYBBBsaiBwBmiKEbKAXhhKJW4NmgR0FkWWTPo1ig2OCNIECAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.04,615,1406606400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="86714399" Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest-exch.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.21]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2014 16:20:58 -0400 X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1 Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 28 Sep 2014 16:20:44 -0400 Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 22:20:43 +0200 From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" To: xrblock Thread-Topic: IETF 91: call for agenda items Thread-Index: Ac/bWa1bJmlBr7IKRnqyIquihdP6Fg== Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:20:43 +0000 Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8AF7E7@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8AF7E7AZFFEXMB04globa_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/sLDCxb840elSLKoswMQ4EhpgUfw Subject: [xrblock] IETF 91: call for agenda items X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 20:21:01 -0000 --_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8AF7E7AZFFEXMB04globa_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, We have entered a request for a meeting at IETF 91, same duration as at IET= F 90. Please send your requests and proposals for the agenda. Thanks and Regards, Dan --_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8AF7E7AZFFEXMB04globa_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

We have entered a request for a meeting at IETF 91, = same duration as at IETF 90.

 

Please send your requests and proposals for the agen= da.

 

Thanks and Regards,

 

Dan

 

--_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA5C8AF7E7AZFFEXMB04globa_--