From nobody Fri Jul 2 06:54:56 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BB83A1F78 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:54:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6cf30CjdCaV for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E459E3A1F77 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:54:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (Authenticated sender: mailbox@rogerprice.org) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F39E1BF20E; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 13:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 15:54:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Roger Price X-X-Sender: rprice@maria.rogerprice.org To: xml2rfc Mailing List Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) X-Message-Flag: Supplemental report to reaper.nsa.gov. rc=0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] Missing - xml2rfc crashes X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 13:54:55 -0000 xml2rfc version 3.5.0. When a is missing in a table as in:
Command Response Note
FSD OK FSD-SET
I get the error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/xml2rfc", line 11, in sys.exit(main()) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/run.py", line 739, in main writer.write(filename) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 345, in write text = self.process() File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 301, in process lines = self.render(self.root, width=72, joiners=joiners) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 369, in render res = func(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 3059, in render_rfc lines = self.ljoin(lines, c, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 561, in ljoin res = mklines(self.render(e, width, **kwargs), e) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 369, in render res = func(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 2237, in render_middle lines = self.ljoin(lines, c, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 561, in ljoin res = mklines(self.render(e, width, **kwargs), e) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 369, in render res = func(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 3329, in render_section lines = self.ljoin(lines, c, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 561, in ljoin res = mklines(self.render(e, width, **kwargs), e) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 369, in render res = func(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 3329, in render_section lines = self.ljoin(lines, c, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 561, in ljoin res = mklines(self.render(e, width, **kwargs), e) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 369, in render res = func(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 3329, in render_section lines = self.ljoin(lines, c, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 561, in ljoin res = mklines(self.render(e, width, **kwargs), e) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 369, in render res = func(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 4199, in render_table lines = self.build_table(e, width, **kwargs) File "/mnt/home/rprice/.local/lib/python3.5/site-packages/xml2rfc/writers/text.py", line 3982, in build_table del k, l UnboundLocalError: local variable 'k' referenced before assignment Roger From nobody Fri Jul 2 07:05:25 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15DB3A1FC2 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:05:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hj47SPTAFaGa for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54AC23A1FC3 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GGcKm3zpgz2xH0; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 16:05:16 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 16:05:16 +0200 Cc: xml2rfc Mailing List X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 646927516.1571079-2636d366bb4fb3ff6714d137029f59ac Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <24AFC0E9-5B1C-49C5-9970-0CFE614B8BEB@tzi.org> References: To: Roger Price X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Missing - xml2rfc crashes X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 14:05:24 -0000 > On 2021-07-02, at 15:54, Roger Price wrote: >=20 > xml2rfc version 3.5.0. =20 https://trac.ietf.org/trac/xml2rfc/ticket/512 Fixed in 3.6.0 (which came out 2021-03-17). = says: > xml2rfc (3.6.0) ietf; urgency=3Dmedium >=20 > * Merged in [3899] from jennifer@painless-security.com: > Prevent crash when column count varies between table rows. Fixes = #512. >=20 It does pay to upgrade occasionally! Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Fri Jul 2 07:51:59 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EAE3A213B for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:51:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2fAw6O7dA6fr for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (relay8-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17403A2139 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 07:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (Authenticated sender: mailbox@rogerprice.org) by relay8-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2E091BF211 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 14:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 16:51:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Roger Price X-X-Sender: rprice@maria.rogerprice.org To: xml2rfc Mailing List In-Reply-To: <24AFC0E9-5B1C-49C5-9970-0CFE614B8BEB@tzi.org> Message-ID: References: <24AFC0E9-5B1C-49C5-9970-0CFE614B8BEB@tzi.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) X-Message-Flag: Supplemental report to reaper.nsa.gov. rc=0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Missing - xml2rfc crashes X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 14:51:58 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> On 2021-07-02, at 15:54, Roger Price wrote: >> xml2rfc version 3.5.0. > > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/xml2rfc/ticket/512 > Fixed in 3.6.0 (which came out 2021-03-17). > says: > >> xml2rfc (3.6.0) ietf; urgency=medium >> >> * Merged in [3899] from jennifer@painless-security.com: >> Prevent crash when column count varies between table rows. Fixes #512. > > It does pay to upgrade occasionally! You are right, and my apologies for polluting the list with SGML source code. Roger From nobody Thu Jul 22 00:38:39 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE093A3C73 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:38:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWNqYBMZWVsV for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 210E13A3C72 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GVkpF6mfRz31M0; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:38:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Carsten Bormann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 09:38:29 +0200 Message-Id: <8424B564-47E1-4655-98D3-D9D29D144ECB@tzi.org> To: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] Outdenting sourcecode X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:38:38 -0000 When I was younger, xml2rfc outdented artwork that was too wide, giving = us a whopping three characters more horizontal space. I still get messages that it does, and it sometimes actually does, but = then there are cases where it doesn=E2=80=99t. Before I go on a goose chase: What=E2=80=99s going on here? (I use xml generated with kramdown-rfc 1.5.2 from = https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/basic-yang-module/blob/master/draft-ietf-r= ats-yang-tpm-charra.md Yes, one can argue how wise it is to have artwork sources indented by = four spaces and relying on xml2rfc to reduce its own indent by three so = everything just fits, but that=E2=80=99s the way it used to work, and I = don=E2=80=99t see how that broke.) Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Thu Jul 22 20:33:16 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207333A1A02 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTmth1wFfa9N for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.198] (unknown [124.197.12.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E6A73A1A03 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:33:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:33:02 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0 Content-Language: en-US To: xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <8424B564-47E1-4655-98D3-D9D29D144ECB@tzi.org> From: Kesara Rathnayake In-Reply-To: <8424B564-47E1-4655-98D3-D9D29D144ECB@tzi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Outdenting sourcecode X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 03:33:15 -0000 On 22/07/21 7:38 pm, Carsten Bormann wrote: > When I was younger, xml2rfc outdented artwork that was too wide, giving us a whopping three characters more horizontal space. > > I still get messages that it does, and it sometimes actually does, but then there are cases where it doesn’t. > Do you have an example where xml2rfc outdented artwork CDATA? > Before I go on a goose chase: What’s going on here? > > (I use xml generated with kramdown-rfc 1.5.2 from https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/basic-yang-module/blob/master/draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra.md > Yes, one can argue how wise it is to have artwork sources indented by four spaces and relying on xml2rfc to reduce its own indent by three so everything just fits, but that’s the way it used to work, and I don’t see how that broke.) This could be down to how pretty_print in lxml prints CDATA because pretty_print_prep function in xml2rfc doesn't seem to be doing anything on CDATA. --Kesara > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > -- Kesara Rathnayake Senior Software Development Engineer - IETF LLC krathnayake@ietf.org From nobody Sun Jul 25 11:03:24 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5CF3A33E6; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:03:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.896 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prVFEH_52x7i; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C823A3395; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (p548dcc89.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GXrWm4cNMz2xJf; Sun, 25 Jul 2021 20:03:16 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 20:03:16 +0200 Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4304B0FD-607D-415F-A44C-FE8139C6612D@tzi.org> References: <8424B564-47E1-4655-98D3-D9D29D144ECB@tzi.org> To: Kesara Rathnayake X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Outdenting sourcecode X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 18:03:23 -0000 On 23. Jul 2021, at 05:33, Kesara Rathnayake = wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 22/07/21 7:38 pm, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> When I was younger, xml2rfc outdented artwork that was too wide, = giving us a whopping three characters more horizontal space. >> I still get messages that it does, and it sometimes actually does, = but then there are cases where it doesn=E2=80=99t. >=20 > Do you have an example where xml2rfc outdented artwork CDATA? As I said, it never outdents the artwork itself, but it does remove the = additional indent of 3 characters. (And it doesn=E2=80=99t make a difference whether the artwork is CDATA = or #PCDATA.) >> Before I go on a goose chase: What=E2=80=99s going on here? >> (I use xml generated with kramdown-rfc 1.5.2 from = https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/basic-yang-module/blob/master/draft-ietf-r= ats-yang-tpm-charra.md >> Yes, one can argue how wise it is to have artwork sources indented by = four spaces and relying on xml2rfc to reduce its own indent by three so = everything just fits, but that=E2=80=99s the way it used to work, and I = don=E2=80=99t see how that broke.) >=20 > This could be down to how pretty_print in lxml prints CDATA because = pretty_print_prep function in xml2rfc doesn't seem to be doing anything = on CDATA. Again, this has nothing to do with CDATA and all with computing indents. Normally, when xml2rfc outdents, you get a message, but not in all cases = of the above file. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Tue Jul 27 15:13:47 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C42F3A0B69 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:13:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.079 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWcu0amuR64L for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 191423A0B63 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.34.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 16RMDVp3087726 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:13:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1627424012; bh=6CIZi4qaCa0L0vaBxG/ct19522agGS/obJNS308EiPU=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=p2QtyWeBrRFmSTT7uVtMUTaLiGG5oF1zOafhtksMqMuLGvb90Rqjdz4GLYD4QmSqc 7fWjXfzxkEggxEKX791WbNJ6pYHR5XogR6OhjUgZ8hDvEGcM5VtuFlqm/WFs565I5H XQbS+hOjGQeRAvmrhx1a6sS0de9QvxEiMw0FV1tc= X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.34.206] claimed to be unformal.localdomain To: xml2rfc@ietf.org From: Robert Sparks Message-ID: <48cef789-44b7-8559-13bf-c44c4a0f67f3@nostrum.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:13:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 22:13:45 -0000 I have occasionally stumbled across other organizations using xml2rfc (no, I don't have a list at hand). I wonder if others have as well, or if there are people from those organizations on this list? If you know of such use, please let us know (send mail directly to me if you aren't comfortable posting on list). RjS From nobody Tue Jul 27 23:19:15 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA703A1F39 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:19:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zrtJs4IkK4Ss for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CA793A1F37 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id c16so1043530wrp.13 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:19:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JgM74rlEasqtgsv7pF73nYHocX/kTssOysJWbKbeTRY=; b=Bus1pAhYwr2nqnSdv2xBiJSrzb0IOnjBL88PkjZCy6AcjhMYHOUNgTjP1NHDIGwtEh frPgEJR7f4Hws+zLGxeOvrF5HLGftz9L7e5QFNFqaozkAYgRdP+mKpvohv0s1hlu7XoF 0I7CLN8Xm2SCJGTLIAd2C44TXllInC9Uszsco9DNcrGR2ANQ2/Ygc+Y+KVn2Ud3Hu57z wM8pjFa5WE1EOHqG0Fq6rsj0eLHD0yCo9qs39dEwBeEtiz+VTfUm/va8DPqoZ+cGHKJG OauWqwzeHAm7dDXULcGhwHuewOKzY4bPVORGNj+BFWPVvOAcrdNOo9lFjOFrwf8C84b2 6+RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JgM74rlEasqtgsv7pF73nYHocX/kTssOysJWbKbeTRY=; b=f/qKY5a/r5SH/gqyhsRLVyeFO0lPIPxIH0l1L5CbIsyJH6SXMvgeoNp5MRdNWsvZNJ jwbGALGu+DukSRLJE9+GZdcoQe6rLgbjYNuFnnMmaRK/2w4qbKZJ04gFEKXG3qTohEGR TkYkxPEI5aQIEHeBtTu4PT43Hf2dNPtjsZNwIjeWRjEJlc8HQ+XStdqoYe+AWTOWbSlm zI5PmnU/k56tSDp2IKneRt61prozYbDh7JtKD5Nohj+R/ONG2WoZX06Az6rfNq7pXdxc GbkvL7m5M4Imu6JV4Fa3Dvcps5iiDNHW3wQtf6qgLgKh1PFkvl0BQtyWLfjWmggULGSJ 4ERg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532veTW/enbhy5HAHeLdqkhZ7SYa7bwMElTmV3cYTu0PM55UDhvP IFsZrSwcZcVhojoHz92xpKdrfZy4ni6CbQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx40qnMdoMllD/TXMyFJzVo1dW6iEkSUdv6Z+I6t2P5YMXci5fdqbbc8hOMd4CQGF/TyUFAOg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e8d0:: with SMTP id k16mr18619782wrn.195.1627453147047; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (25.131.146.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.146.131.25]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u15sm4963822wmn.6.2021.07.27.23.19.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jul 2021 23:19:06 -0700 (PDT) To: Robert Sparks , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <48cef789-44b7-8559-13bf-c44c4a0f67f3@nostrum.com> From: Anders Rundgren Message-ID: <2273c8f8-5914-1701-2d04-a8103c5d891a@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:19:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <48cef789-44b7-8559-13bf-c44c4a0f67f3@nostrum.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:19:15 -0000 On 2021-07-28 0:13, Robert Sparks wrote: > I have occasionally stumbled across other organizations using xml2rfc > (no, I don't have a list at hand). > > I wonder if others have as well, or if there are people from those > organizations on this list? > > If you know of such use, please let us know (send mail directly to me if > you aren't comfortable posting on list). Being in the situation of also writing specifications not targeting the IETF, I have been doing some research recently. W3C use bikeshed which seems like a nice(r) alternative for non-IETF work. I have yet to try it though. If you need PDF, most browsers can do that as well. The htmlized RFC format was OK until the hyper-links got smashed. I currently see the "diff" utility as the main attraction. There seems to be no such thing for rendered Web pages :( Anders https://tabatkins.github.io/bikeshed/ > > RjS > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > From nobody Wed Jul 28 05:48:36 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760CC3A0DC5 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:48:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JV9Ls-sVzGmZ for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E8363A0DC4 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id x7so2895110ljn.10 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2QOL6Jmu/6AMabFGpGbfFd7C9S3txE0XsShM129kqos=; b=bCteZeZA+/YUXCNDjX1crcu8DfXNad6mwM1wRsilPoN36H3EY13MJVvKtoxtCtd2qA pQK4rt2BoK3MVvldQhmjtCwGqVCmxVZJy9mi5riowrqnZk6INluQfDGBd3CKs2XnkAR4 0qZAcint/XB+MuUKhZ8aArmYhX9AHK5v47RmwIjRjNYGQU5MtFwoH1f9K02wQnglVqrv F4Omprs2/ktB/1za8VEaoAJ5eBCESyJkOYSeNeKeP3JseQO8khlsjZM34ad8PNm5386H KGBEqf8Nr6fxrUh4dodAEqUVSVYgaGMLV0UfDRC/9a/hWKsJaAFs/WT3usx6DRLBAdvV 1ajQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2QOL6Jmu/6AMabFGpGbfFd7C9S3txE0XsShM129kqos=; b=DrwE5ILkQCG34ogUz/0vz7YUfyr7vpY6wgUH8j9wYVViEBILkJX+9UPhvbb9lQWzLI hXqdGTr6L4G4wmGzRiyigQToWjole2Fv/XZ4VEI2mCveEYhhUzGdaOtmpIWzvfO/uXEF ywMcyyNvSiTGaxMWqqp+xsjI7OtKrfUiaI96LbN7KduuYLamWZ9Np60xTOo3nIEyrbUE Yq+D5q+iT9sDoWO7aL0lLEKQ9T905GkiWRFamndSWSKEFcym+MJkhrV7ZNyN24htwmFP G9+6Mr4gDUgs7kCa92r5xWkuSl5iuCspoEh67fT5KODMidEnD5qwj2y//jXpW8Pc/SbS LANw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dx5zp75e5ZXScrVoHrVvj0a6/E3XlHk8mq905vFzuc85yzzQl EuB1f1DJVc6mX6K5hYSgcOjA/fGx0F08wIgni5zsTOUIm/8ZJ+uas8pFaramB85byNFmX35Lsnv KnF3c6t28tNPn8V1wSy9V/pcG X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQnPejJuXQ0uTsmXDYrHb/GKlAzJe3LN9VGNmYBUW4qLeE2S7dxwhtI+9C4OTF1e+XTzSmQEENlsIG5dLSfKs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7319:: with SMTP id o25mr18603659ljc.264.1627476506629; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 05:48:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <48cef789-44b7-8559-13bf-c44c4a0f67f3@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <48cef789-44b7-8559-13bf-c44c4a0f67f3@nostrum.com> From: Brian Campbell Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 06:48:00 -0600 Message-ID: To: Robert Sparks Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000f072f05c82e6724" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Non IETF users of xml2rfc X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: XML2RFC discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:48:35 -0000 --0000000000000f072f05c82e6724 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The OpenID Foundation uses xml2rfc output for the specs and drafts their WGs produce https://openid.net/developers/specs/ On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 4:13 PM Robert Sparks wrote: > I have occasionally stumbled across other organizations using xml2rfc > (no, I don't have a list at hand). > > I wonder if others have as well, or if there are people from those > organizations on this list? > > If you know of such use, please let us know (send mail directly to me if > you aren't comfortable posting on list). > > RjS > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > --=20 _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged= =20 material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,=20 distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.=C2=A0 If you h= ave=20 received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately= =20 by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your=20 computer. Thank you._ --0000000000000f072f05c82e6724 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The OpenID Foundation uses xml2rfc output for the spe= cs and drafts their WGs produce https://openid.net/developers/specs/

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at= 4:13 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks= @nostrum.com> wrote:
I have occasionally stumbled across other organizations using x= ml2rfc
(no, I don't have a list at hand).

I wonder if others have as well, or if there are people from those
organizations on this list?

If you know of such use, please let us know (send mail directly to me if you aren't comfortable posting on list).

RjS

_______________________________________________
xml2rfc mailing list
xml2rfc@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc

<= span style=3D"margin:0px;padding:0px;border:0px;outline:0px;vertical-align:= baseline;background:transparent;font-family:proxima-nova-zendesk,system-ui,= -apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Oxygen-Sans,Ub= untu,Cantarell,"Helvetica Neue",Arial,sans-serif;font-weight:600"= >CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidenti= al and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). A= ny review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited= .=C2=A0 If you have received this communication in error, please notify the= sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachmen= ts from your computer. Thank you. --0000000000000f072f05c82e6724--