From masinter@adobe.com Fri Mar 9 16:09:49 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD5C21F8527 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:09:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.862 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.753, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VgPOuQ+Tbpb3 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:09:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og117.obsmtp.com (exprod6og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C11021F8525 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:09:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob117.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1qby+wgEbfrQPpueZwqjSrYsw9By/CM@postini.com; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:09:48 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2A07jJ0029751 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:07:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q2A09hPm029880 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.99]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:09:43 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:09:40 -0800 Thread-Topic: Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz+UhRtcMkLvUFWRlyJkXraHMWhLw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A8E5AA33nambxv01acorp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:09:49 -0000 --_000_C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A8E5AA33nambxv01acorp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was wondering if anyone has created a conditional preprocessor for xml2rf= c where alternative content could be supplied for the .html and .html.pdf = editions of the document, even if the .txt version remains ASCII only and w= ith ASCII art, the .html version could be rendered with actual unicode char= acters. I'm not imagining automatic conversion, but just manually supplying alterna= tive in the .xml source. --_000_C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A8E5AA33nambxv01acorp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I was wondering = if anyone has created a conditional preprocessor for xml2rfc where  al= ternative content could be supplied for the .html and .html.pdf editions of= the document, even if the .txt version remains ASCII only and with ASCII a= rt, the .html version could be rendered with actual unicode characters.

 

I= ’m not imagining automatic conversion, but just manually supplying al= ternative in the .xml source.

 = ;

 

= --_000_C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D06A8E5AA33nambxv01acorp_-- From nico@cryptonector.com Fri Mar 9 16:54:23 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DF221E8019 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:54:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.487, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38-BGVrsWXhi for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:54:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056B021E8018 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:54:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFF626C05E for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=SIEr9z+vyh1SXgBVplwM+m9qpeAmQ99JdmRhT0qWd9Sh kTUV2u52j85fGNmlUENUHH2f08O5Xj7jz/sJOnKdVu/bDZw0uKq9VOWZduK+/oja Ou/dSAzc/4vm68rjt3+9R0LOST27V+1ooHLcuh7ro04hx6E3+pRL+womqf6gMls= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=Ij3hZ8GRm3pcOrg3gS/q9zEsqVY=; b=cXEy9pKLroa 0VlOFXL0rVKa2mCfSrpv2rAAemOPRJ9Hz5xzFB9vdfU6O6/XdnrQv6qO8FWsYOQT FW+c2IAnSKlP/NPqUi6IATZJ/jQ/pHIENYwg+Nf1xtCi9K0DsPIAF4OJ7hx6QT9g eQr7iNzKma7HzzHsnZbfhLixcpK9cbAQ= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7484426C00B for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so2264145dak.31 for ; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.129.129 with SMTP id nw1mr7461870pbb.13.1331340859122; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:54:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:54:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:54:18 -0600 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Larry Masinter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:54:23 -0000 On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has created a conditional preprocessor for xml2= rfc > where =C2=A0alternative content could be supplied for the .html and .html= .pdf > editions of the document, even if the .txt version remains ASCII only and > with ASCII art, the .html version could be rendered with actual unicode > characters. I do hope at some point we switch to UTF-8 for .txt... Nico -- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Fri Mar 9 17:04:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FC821E8053 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:04:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voDW2OR2dkgp for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C2C21E8019 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:04:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2012 01:04:15 -0000 Received: from p57A6D847.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.216.71] by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 10 Mar 2012 02:04:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+5v/do+li5IwpFVsPnXqoe5yoqNi930uHWbyFgyn qAutNqODIV69uB Message-ID: <4F5AA88E.9070701@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:04:14 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Masinter References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:04:18 -0000 On 2012-03-10 01:09, Larry Masinter wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has created a conditional preprocessor for > xml2rfc where alternative content could be supplied for the .html and > .html.pdf editions of the document, even if the .txt version remains > ASCII only and with ASCII art, the .html version could be rendered with > actual unicode characters. > > I’m not imagining automatic conversion, but just manually supplying > alternative in the .xml source. > ... I haven't done that, but it would be an interesting experiment. If you have a sample in mind, I can put together an XSLT, or even integrate it into my existing XSLTs. Best regards, Julian From rra@stanford.edu Fri Mar 9 17:24:56 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CCE21E8019 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:24:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.372 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aRx8xVJ4NGOR for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp4.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289D421E8018 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A53521A544D for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:24:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A4A1A5392 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:24:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6128B2F454; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:24:54 -0800 (PST) From: Russ Allbery To: "xml2rfc\@ietf.org" In-Reply-To: (Nico Williams's message of "Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:54:18 -0600") Organization: The Eyrie References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:24:53 -0800 Message-ID: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:24:57 -0000 Nico Williams writes: > Larry Masinter wrote: >> I was wondering if anyone has created a conditional preprocessor for >> xml2rfc where =C2=A0alternative content could be supplied for the .html = and >> .html.pdf editions of the document, even if the .txt version remains >> ASCII only and with ASCII art, the .html version could be rendered with >> actual unicode characters. > I do hope at some point we switch to UTF-8 for .txt... Amen. It's quite frustrating to be required to misspell people's names. --=20 Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) From masinter@adobe.com Sat Mar 10 07:49:49 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33A121F8599 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.855 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.711, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iZs4v10-b0n4 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og110.obsmtp.com (exprod6og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A9D21F851D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob110.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1t4GWrKltOvDiT0zJ5/mGRHcwj2+A2c@postini.com; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:47 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AFliJ0002609; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AFnjMM027467; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.97]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:45 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: Russ Allbery , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:42 -0800 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz+XJ1v4aSemsNCSdGkwpAzCwSCBwAdqJUg Message-ID: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> In-Reply-To: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:49:49 -0000 PiBJIGRvIGhvcGUgYXQgc29tZSBwb2ludCB3ZSBzd2l0Y2ggdG8gVVRGLTggZm9yIC50eHQuLi4N Cj4gQW1lbi4gIEl0J3MgcXVpdGUgZnJ1c3RyYXRpbmcgdG8gYmUgcmVxdWlyZWQgdG8gbWlzc3Bl bGwgcGVvcGxlJ3MgbmFtZXMuDQoNCkkgZG9uJ3QgdGhpbmsgcmVkdWNpbmcgdGhlICJmcnVzdHJh dGlvbiIgb2YgIm1pc3NwZWxsaW5nIiBwZW9wbGUncyBuYW1lcyBpcyBhIHN1ZmZpY2llbnQgbW90 aXZhdGlvbi4NCg0KVGhlIHJpc2tzIG9mIHN3aXRjaGluZyB0byBVVEYtOCBmb3IgLnR4dCBoYXZl IGNvbnNpZGVyYWJsZSBvdmVybGFwIHdpdGggdGhlIHNlY3VyaXR5IGNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb25zIGZv ciBJUklzIChhbmQgSUROKS4gVGhlIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50IGlzIGZvciBnbG9iYWwgdHJhbnNjcmlh YmlsaXR5IC0tIHRoYXQgbm8gbWF0dGVyIHdoYXQgeW91ciBuYXR1cmFsIGxhbmd1YWdlIGNhcGFi aWxpdGllcyBhcmUsIHRoYXQgaWYgeW91IGFyZSBhYmxlIHRvIHJlYWQgdGhlIHRlY2huaWNhbCBj b250ZW50IG9mIGFuIFJGQywgeW91IGNhbiByZWFkIGFuZCB0cmFuc2NyaWJlIGl0Lg0KDQpNeSBv bmx5IGNvbmNlcm4gYXQgdGhpcyBwb2ludCBpcyB0byBhbGxvdyBub24tbm9ybWF0aXZlIGV4YW1w bGVzIGFuZCBpbGx1c3RyYXRpb25zIHRvIGJlIG1vcmUgcmVhZGlseSBpbmNsdWRlZC4gIA0KDQpJ J20gcHV6emxpbmcgYWJvdXQgaG93IGV4dGVuc2l2ZSB0byBtYWtlIHRoZSBjaG9pY2UuLi4gd2hl dGhlciBpdCdzIGFuIGFsdGVybmF0aXZlIGF0IHRoZSA8dD4gbGV2ZWw/IE9yIGV2ZW4gdG8gbWFr ZSBpdCBvbmx5IGFuIG9wdGlvbmFsIF9hZGRpdGlvbmFsXyBzZWN0aW9uLCBlLmcuLCB0aGUgSFRN TC9QREYgdmVyc2lvbiB3b3VsZCBpbmNsdWRlIGFsbCBvZiB0aGUgQVNDSUkgdGV4dCBidXQgbWln aHQgYWxzbyBjb250YWluIGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgKFhIVE1MPyBPciBhIHZlcnkgcmVzdHJpY3RlZCBz dWJzZXQgb2YgWEhUTUwgdGFncz8gT3IgU1ZHIGRpYWdyYW1zPyBJbWFnZXM/KSBtYXJrdXAgdG8g YmUgaW5zZXJ0ZWQuDQoNCkxhcnJ5DQoNCi0tLS0tT3JpZ2luYWwgTWVzc2FnZS0tLS0tDQpGcm9t OiB4bWwycmZjLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzp4bWwycmZjLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5v cmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBSdXNzIEFsbGJlcnkNClNlbnQ6IEZyaWRheSwgTWFyY2ggMDksIDIw MTIgNToyNSBQTQ0KVG86IHhtbDJyZmNAaWV0Zi5vcmcNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbeG1sMnJmY10g R2VuZXJhdGluZyBIVE1MIGFuZCBQREYgd2l0aCBVbmljb2RlIChhbmQgZGlhZ3JhbXM/KQ0KDQpO aWNvIFdpbGxpYW1zIDxuaWNvQGNyeXB0b25lY3Rvci5jb20+IHdyaXRlczoNCj4gTGFycnkgTWFz aW50ZXIgPG1hc2ludGVyQGFkb2JlLmNvbT4gd3JvdGU6DQoNCj4+IEkgd2FzIHdvbmRlcmluZyBp ZiBhbnlvbmUgaGFzIGNyZWF0ZWQgYSBjb25kaXRpb25hbCBwcmVwcm9jZXNzb3IgZm9yIA0KPj4g eG1sMnJmYyB3aGVyZSDCoGFsdGVybmF0aXZlIGNvbnRlbnQgY291bGQgYmUgc3VwcGxpZWQgZm9y IHRoZSAuaHRtbCANCj4+IGFuZCAuaHRtbC5wZGYgZWRpdGlvbnMgb2YgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LCBl dmVuIGlmIHRoZSAudHh0IHZlcnNpb24gDQo+PiByZW1haW5zIEFTQ0lJIG9ubHkgYW5kIHdpdGgg QVNDSUkgYXJ0LCB0aGUgLmh0bWwgdmVyc2lvbiBjb3VsZCBiZSANCj4+IHJlbmRlcmVkIHdpdGgg YWN0dWFsIHVuaWNvZGUgY2hhcmFjdGVycy4NCg0KPiBJIGRvIGhvcGUgYXQgc29tZSBwb2ludCB3 ZSBzd2l0Y2ggdG8gVVRGLTggZm9yIC50eHQuLi4NCg0KQW1lbi4gIEl0J3MgcXVpdGUgZnJ1c3Ry YXRpbmcgdG8gYmUgcmVxdWlyZWQgdG8gbWlzc3BlbGwgcGVvcGxlJ3MgbmFtZXMuDQoNCi0tIA0K UnVzcyBBbGxiZXJ5IChycmFAc3RhbmZvcmQuZWR1KSAgICAgICAgICAgICA8aHR0cDovL3d3dy5l eXJpZS5vcmcvfmVhZ2xlLz4NCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fDQp4bWwycmZjIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KeG1sMnJmY0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6 Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby94bWwycmZjDQo= From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sat Mar 10 10:25:52 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7685B21F856C for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:25:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.932 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fA2hG8sSwZ7B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AAA121F8573 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:25:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2012 18:25:47 -0000 Received: from p57A6EDE8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.237.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 10 Mar 2012 19:25:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19WkfsvxoBWCdWAvtiUoglFxsqL77KmMC2JXF3ytn PA06armWT4qz0K Message-ID: <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 19:25:36 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Masinter References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 18:25:52 -0000 On 2012-03-10 16:49, Larry Masinter wrote: >> I do hope at some point we switch to UTF-8 for .txt... >> Amen. It's quite frustrating to be required to misspell people's names. > > I don't think reducing the "frustration" of "misspelling" people's names is a sufficient motivation. > > The risks of switching to UTF-8 for .txt have considerable overlap with the security considerations for IRIs (and IDN). The requirement is for global transcriability -- that no matter what your natural language capabilities are, that if you are able to read the technical content of an RFC, you can read and transcribe it. > > My only concern at this point is to allow non-normative examples and illustrations to be more readily included. > > I'm puzzling about how extensive to make the choice... whether it's an alternative at the level? Or even to make it only an optional _additional_ section, e.g., the HTML/PDF version would include all of the ASCII text but might also contain additional (XHTML? Or a very restricted subset of XHTML tags? Or SVG diagrams? Images?) markup to be inserted. > > Larry > ... Maybe we should start small, and look at your concrete use case. I'll assume it has to do with putting non-ASCII characters into IRI examples? Best regards, Julian From rra@stanford.edu Sat Mar 10 12:06:12 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B49521F855F for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.196 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rIE9YSyC+q1 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3E021F855B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AC90180D0 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21082805D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E17222F454; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:05 -0800 (PST) From: Russ Allbery To: "xml2rfc\@ietf.org" In-Reply-To: (Larry Masinter's message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:49:42 -0800") Organization: The Eyrie References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:06:05 -0800 Message-ID: <8762eckyqa.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:06:12 -0000 Larry Masinter writes: > I don't think reducing the "frustration" of "misspelling" people's names > is a sufficient motivation. I don't really want to get into a long discussion of this, but I do want to say that I disagree that this is not sufficient motivation. Attribution in published work is important, and attribution should involve correctly spelling and representing people's names. I find it faintly embarassing to use a publication format that privileges English names over all of the other contributors around the world. I realize that this isn't completely unreasonable given that the publication language is English, and at the time there was no better alternative, but I think we have a better alternative now. But I read http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~uno/help.html (Non-Latin Names) at an impressionable age. :) -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) From masinter@adobe.com Sat Mar 10 12:26:32 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E677221F84FC for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.74 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.141, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQEMf9ivejuA for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og108.obsmtp.com (exprod6og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F3321F8528 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1u49feQGEVc0GaQuZwS+HV1t9XHhur6@postini.com; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:31 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (ms-exchange.macromedia.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AKQRN3008538; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AKQQMM029380; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:26 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: Russ Allbery , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:26:23 -0800 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz++UF1QJeXnfWuS8ql4EHpqN6JDgAAQ0mg Message-ID: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <8762eckyqa.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> In-Reply-To: <8762eckyqa.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:26:33 -0000 Sorry, I was trying to have a technical discussion of requirements and use = cases, cost and benefit, not a political rant. Your quote: > I don't think reducing the "frustration" of "misspelling" people's=20 > names is a sufficient motivation. was taken completely out of context.=20 You said: "I don't really want to get into a long discussion of this" but you cannot misquote me and then refuse to discuss it. > but I do want to say that I disagree that this is not sufficient motivat= ion. The context you left out was essential. I said "Reducing pain authoring",= where said pain was caused by misspelling, is not "a sufficient reason" fo= r change Y. There are several factors in this evaluation: A: The pain is not eliminated. It is still necessary to misspell people's = names, since there is still a need to prepare an ASCII-only text file. B: The pain already occurs naturally for all names, since names are sometim= es misspelled. C: There are other related pains that might occur around embarrassment in c= ausing a publication In your reply, you calibrate your amount of embarrassment ("faintly") again= st a whole authoring policy for which you are not faintly responsible. If there are use cases for extending the repertoire of characters allowed i= n RFC publications, those use cases, and the costs and benefits, need to be= examined carefully. I'm not arguing against a policy of allowing unicode names, I'm arguing tha= t the policy needs to be carefully conditioned so as not to lose important = features of the current publication policy. But it does require you to acknowledge there are some features. Lest this be called off-topic:=20 this question is pretty central to the design of the xml2rfc I proposed of = allowing HTML generation to include unicode when TXT generation does not. From masinter@adobe.com Sat Mar 10 12:35:24 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8506521F8564 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:35:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST=0.134, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHaAxZsym-Fu for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og117.obsmtp.com (exprod6og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF08621F8559 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:34:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob117.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1u66KBctqZzXe2ebMOEu8pVhPGTiYuQ@postini.com; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:35:23 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AKWiJ0009332; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:32:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q2AKYgPl024728; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:34:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:34:41 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:34:39 -0800 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz+6zuzlqTGUepDRtWegvIHc+XaYQAERP3g Message-ID: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "Adil Allawi \(adil@diwan.com\)" , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" , Chris Weber , "public-i18n-core@w3.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:35:24 -0000 e3tUYWxraW5nIGFib3V0IGFsbG93aW5nIGEgY29uZGl0aW9uYWwtdXNlIGluIFhNTDJSRkMgd2hl cmUgeW91IGNvdWxkIHN1cHBseSB1bmljb2RlIHN0cmluZ3MgZm9yIHRoZSAuSFRNTCBhbmQgLlBE RiByZW5kZWlybmdzfX0NCg0KPiBNYXliZSB3ZSBzaG91bGQgc3RhcnQgc21hbGwsIGFuZCBsb29r IGF0IHlvdXIgY29uY3JldGUgdXNlIGNhc2UuDQo+IEknbGwgYXNzdW1lIGl0IGhhcyB0byBkbyB3 aXRoIHB1dHRpbmcgbm9uLUFTQ0lJIGNoYXJhY3RlcnMgaW50byBJUkkgZXhhbXBsZXM/DQoNClll cy4gVGhlcmUgYXJlIHNldmVyYWwgZXhhbXBsZXMgd2hlcmUgYWNjZW50ZWQgcm9tYW4gY2hhcmFj dGVycyBJIHRoaW5rIHdvdWxkIGJlIG1vcmUgdXNlZnVsLCBlc3BlY2lhbGx5IHdoZW4gdGFsa2lu ZyBhYm91dCB1bmNvZGVkIGFuZCBjb2RlZCBmb3Jtcy4NClRha2UgdGhlIGZpcnN0IGV4YW1wbGUg b2Ygc2VjdGlvbiAzLjQuMS4gDQoNCiAgIEZvciBleGFtcGxlLCB0aGUgSVJJDQogICAiaHR0cDov L3ImI3hFOTtzdW0mI3hFOTsuZXhhbXBsZS5vcmciDQogICB3aWxsIGJlIGNvbnZlcnRlZCB0bw0K ICAgImh0dHA6Ly9yJUMzJUE5c3VtJUMzJUE5LmV4YW1wbGUub3JnIi4NCg0KDQpCdXQgaW4gZmFj dCB0aGVyZSBpcyBubyB3YXkgdG8gcHV0ICJhbiBJUkkiIGluIGFuIEludGVybmV0IGRyYWZ0LCBz aW5jZSAgaXQgaXMgYSBzZXF1ZW5jZSBvZiB1bmljb2RlIGNoYXJhY3RlcnMsIGFuZCB0byBnaXZl IGFuIGV4YW1wbGUgb2Ygb25lIGluIGFuIGFzY2lpLW9ubHkgZG9jdW1lbnQsIHlvdSBoYXZlIHRv IHVzZSBhbiBlbmNvZGVkIGZvcm0uDQoNClNpbmNlIEludGVybmV0IERyYWZ0cyBhbmQgUkZDcyBh bHJlYWR5IGFsbG93IHN1cHBseWluZyBhbmQgZGVsaXZlcmluZyBQREYsIHdlIHdvdWxkbid0IGhh dmUgdG8gY2hhbmdlIElFVEYgcG9saWN5IHRvIGdldCB0aGVzZSBleGFtcGxlcyBhY3R1YWxseSBs ZWdpYmxlIHRvIHRob3NlIHdobyBuZWVkIHRvIHJlYWQgYW5kIGludGVycHJldCB0aGVtLg0KDQoN Cg== From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Sat Mar 10 12:43:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE93121F8549 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:43:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.696 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ovxsRS7Vx+dk for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427AA21F84F8 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2AKhhP2065492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:43:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:43:43 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> To: Larry Masinter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: xml2rfc list , public-i18n-core@w3.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:43:48 -0000 On Mar 10, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > Since Internet Drafts and RFCs already allow supplying and delivering = PDF, we wouldn't have to change IETF policy to get these examples = actually legible to those who need to read and interpret them. This is a discussion for rfc-interest, not for xml2rfc. If the RFC = Editor allows putting non-ASCII characters in RFCs, it is safe to assume = that the xml2rfc tool will be updated to allow that. If the RFC Editor = does not allow that, it makes little sense to allow it in Internet = Drafts that are intended to become RFCs. Just because you are punching from the side instead of going through the = top, that doesn't change the fact that you are re-opening the can of = worms. (I say this as someone who has advocated for what you want in the = past, doing so with Internet Drafts, not just questions on mailing = lists.) --Paul Hoffman From johnl@iecc.com Sat Mar 10 12:45:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECF521F85B1 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:45:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.578 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.621, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZzHiemTMkG15 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:45:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC5121F855B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:45:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 69979 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2012 20:45:13 -0000 Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 10 Mar 2012 20:45:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4f5bbd59.xn--9vv.k1203; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=/Q0X1LTf4akra0p4X4WCNVwwJor18uhvWlkuobFtiJc=; b=c9Ew1HKx4vG0A3/hPv1KRLLEoanIOqAR9Hv39OijpFiEOMiGYeOxp2CYOHh/rQc+9NftJCtfTI5b1yeJZfCk49ubyDgKpOHM5aG48YlEo91guDBo98wHXg2zXs6Y9XH9nvAtte3GTYXbYokKcTF3vCQSShYKnS1rkgViP/Kg2DU= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Date: 10 Mar 2012 20:44:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> From: "John Levine" To: xml2rfc@ietf.org In-Reply-To: Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:45:16 -0000 >> I do hope at some point we switch to UTF-8 for .txt... We certainly need to fix the character set problem at some point, but it seems to me that .txt files with UTF-8 mixed in would cause more problems than they solve since there's no way to tell from the outside that there's anything other than ASCII inside. We're having an informal session on future RFC formats in Paris, mostly to introduce the new RFC series editor to the swamp. See you all there. R's, John From masinter@adobe.com Sat Mar 10 14:01:23 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED421F8540 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:01:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.717 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXXOv9lga1UA for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:01:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og110.obsmtp.com (exprod6og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB7F21F8513 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:01:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob110.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1vPGnNr6fB3W75MC2PtUncEHETFaOBy@postini.com; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:01:22 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AM0tN3011002; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:00:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AM0sMM008994; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:00:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.97]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:00:54 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: Paul Hoffman Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:00:52 -0800 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz+/n1SXWQ/7vDTQ82WkiBWojO94gAClceg Message-ID: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: xml2rfc list , "public-i18n-core@w3.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:01:23 -0000 I'm trying to solve a local problem of making the IRI internet drafts more = useful, through a change to (or a pre-processor for) xml2rfc. I do not wish= to open the "What formats are allowed for RFCs" can of worms, please stay = completely shut. The current policy, however, allows for PDF editions of RF= Cs. My only question is how to best accomplish, using xml2rfc, this limited= design goal. So no, this is *not* a discussion for rfc-interest, because I do not at all= wish to change the current policy, which I think allows everything I'd lik= e to accomplish. I'm *only* talking about how best to change xml2rfc to be useful in produci= ng submissions which are consistent with existing policy. Larry =20 -----Original Message----- From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul.hoffman@vpnc.org]=20 Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 12:44 PM To: Larry Masinter Cc: xml2rfc list; public-i18n-core@w3.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) On Mar 10, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > Since Internet Drafts and RFCs already allow supplying and delivering PDF= , we wouldn't have to change IETF policy to get these examples actually leg= ible to those who need to read and interpret them. This is a discussion for rfc-interest, not for xml2rfc. If the RFC Editor a= llows putting non-ASCII characters in RFCs, it is safe to assume that the x= ml2rfc tool will be updated to allow that. If the RFC Editor does not allow= that, it makes little sense to allow it in Internet Drafts that are intend= ed to become RFCs. Just because you are punching from the side instead of going through the to= p, that doesn't change the fact that you are re-opening the can of worms. (= I say this as someone who has advocated for what you want in the past, doin= g so with Internet Drafts, not just questions on mailing lists.) --Paul Hoffman From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sat Mar 10 14:09:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8439721F84B4 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:09:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G9p3QRi7G2nv for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E96B21F84B2 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:09:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2012 22:09:28 -0000 Received: from p57A6EDE8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.237.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 10 Mar 2012 23:09:28 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1809dVF1500ScaVoPTMgtnuDgx0oynYjOPjwgrcKP WIEcmWcenpfDGW Message-ID: <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:09:23 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Masinter References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman , "public-i18n-core@w3.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:09:30 -0000 On 2012-03-10 23:00, Larry Masinter wrote: > I'm trying to solve a local problem of making the IRI internet drafts more useful, through a change to (or a pre-processor for) xml2rfc. I do not wish to open the "What formats are allowed for RFCs" can of worms, please stay completely shut. The current policy, however, allows for PDF editions of RFCs. My only question is how to best accomplish, using xml2rfc, this limited design goal. > > So no, this is *not* a discussion for rfc-interest, because I do not at all wish to change the current policy, which I think allows everything I'd like to accomplish. > > I'm *only* talking about how best to change xml2rfc to be useful in producing submissions which are consistent with existing policy. > > Larry You could just use rfc2629.xslt and rfc2629toFop.xslt, which should work fine with non-ASCII characters. For "down-conversion" to the all-ASCII format we'd need a simple XSLT that strips or converts the examples. (Stripping will be easier :-) Best regards, Julian From paul.hoffman@vpnc.org Sat Mar 10 14:18:25 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA9D21F854B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:18:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.695 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.695 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id stNqkxPk0Yrn for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FA121F8549 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2AMIKsE067761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:18:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:18:20 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1CDD2C7A-D837-47A2-A45A-50D42C0BA4EE@vpnc.org> References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> To: Larry Masinter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: xml2rfc list , "public-i18n-core@w3.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:18:25 -0000 On Mar 10, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Larry Masinter wrote: > I do not wish to open the "What formats are allowed for RFCs" can of = worms, please stay completely shut. The current policy, however, allows = for PDF editions of RFCs. Those two sentences do not belong together, much less in the same email. = "allows for PDF editions of RFCs" *is* part of the can of worms. PDF is = a document format. (I find it odd to be saying that to someone who works = for Adobe.) --Paul Hoffman From masinter@adobe.com Sat Mar 10 14:42:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C60E21F854B for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:42:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GiKPYMkziG9e for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og102.obsmtp.com (exprod6og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D3021F8549 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob102.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1vYuqOYHLn7AHQSE4CwAKbJBHBczQ0j@postini.com; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:42:26 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AMftN3011841; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:42:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AMfsMM012808; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:41:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.97]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:41:55 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: Paul Hoffman Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:41:53 -0800 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz/C7Zt3lKKa9dUTt2M6Gv1HjH2hQAAm8Hw Message-ID: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <1CDD2C7A-D837-47A2-A45A-50D42C0BA4EE@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: <1CDD2C7A-D837-47A2-A45A-50D42C0BA4EE@vpnc.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: xml2rfc list , "public-i18n-core@w3.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:42:27 -0000 Sorry, I thought RFC 2223 had been updated to allow PDF files as well as Po= stscript files. =20 " PDF is a document format. (I find it odd to be saying that to someone who= works for Adobe.)" I know better than most, and have for longer than I've worked for Adobe.=20 While the primary RFCs is always an ASCII text file, secondary or alternative versions of RFC may be provided in PostScript. This decision is motivated by the desire to include diagrams, drawings, and such in RFCs. PostScript documents (on paper only, so far) are visually more appealing and have better readability. I agree that the policy discussion doesn't belong on this mailing list, and= I'm trying to keep the topic restricted to "how to modify xml2rfc so that it is possible to produce documents which me= et the guidelines of RFC 2223". In particular, how to include Diagrams Drawings "and such" -- interpreting "and such" to include "Examples where prese= ntation of unicode strings in natural examples". From masinter@adobe.com Sat Mar 10 14:45:01 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46DB21F8523 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:45:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.687 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6vz2uqoKtqL4 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:45:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og105.obsmtp.com (exprod6og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3709921F849A for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:44:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT1vZVaYX+W0yNvvHtDlzodhieV3xBvb1@postini.com; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:45:01 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com ([153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AMgaJ0012351; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:42:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2AMiaMM012978; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:44:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:44:36 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:44:34 -0800 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz/CnfRKhiTZ0k2TQ+n9cq+HQbBnAABKE0w Message-ID: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman , "public-i18n-core@w3.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:45:02 -0000 > You could just use rfc2629.xslt and rfc2629toFop.xslt, which should work = fine with non-ASCII characters. > For "down-conversion" to the all-ASCII format we'd need a simple XSLT tha= t strips or converts the examples. > (Stripping will be easier :-) I'm afraid that I don't believe "stripping" is sufficient. For an example t= o be useful, it needs to use explicit notation. The ASCII-only version need= s a *different* introductory section than the Unicode one, so I need a "alt= ernative selection" syntax and not a "strip one" selection process. =20 From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Sat Mar 10 22:45:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCA521F864F for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:45:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.62 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.830, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdEBD9JAhRd8 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:45:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02DF21F864D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:45:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q2B6jmAp018767 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:45:48 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 327c_9e29_d5c7d544_6b45_11e1_8056_001d096c5782; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:45:48 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:52602) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:45:51 +0900 Message-ID: <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:45:47 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Masinter References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "julian.reschke@gmx.de" , xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 06:45:57 -0000 On 2012/03/11 7:44, Larry Masinter wrote: >> You could just use rfc2629.xslt and rfc2629toFop.xslt, which should work fine with non-ASCII characters. > >> For "down-conversion" to the all-ASCII format we'd need a simple XSLT that strips or converts the examples. > >> (Stripping will be easier :-) > > I'm afraid that I don't believe "stripping" is sufficient. For an example to be useful, it needs to use explicit notation. The ASCII-only version needs a *different* introductory section than the Unicode one, so I need a "alternative selection" syntax and not a "strip one" selection process. Alternatives can be achieved through stripping by either stripping one or another of two pieces. So that's not too difficult. I'll look at this technically after the upcoming submission deadline. Ideas for the name(s) of the element(s) are appreciated. Regards, Martin. From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Sat Mar 10 23:29:51 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2094D21F867E for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:29:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.586 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.796, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iif5O7wZEQ3r for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7150D21F85DD for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:29:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q2B7Tfq7032569 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:29:42 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 327a_dad3_f71e5672_6b4b_11e1_81af_001d096c5782; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:29:40 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:55581) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:29:45 +0900 Message-ID: <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:29:40 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Levine References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:29:51 -0000 On 2012/03/11 5:44, John Levine wrote: >>> I do hope at some point we switch to UTF-8 for .txt... > > We certainly need to fix the character set problem at some point, but > it seems to me that .txt files with UTF-8 mixed in would cause more > problems than they solve since there's no way to tell from the outside > that there's anything other than ASCII inside. Sorry, I don't understand this. There's certainly no way to tell from the outside of a .txt file that there's anything other than US-ASCII inside, but there is also no way to tell that there's anything other than UTF-8 inside, and so on. With respect to .txt files, ASCII isn't special in any way. Regards, Martin. From rra@stanford.edu Sat Mar 10 23:40:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B67921F8688 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.292 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.292 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.307, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMxIC1LbEzhT for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.67.219.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB7D21F858D for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CD49813A for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.67.225.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088B0800F for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D86962F454; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:51 -0800 (PST) From: Russ Allbery To: xml2rfc@ietf.org In-Reply-To: <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> ("Martin J. =?utf-8?Q?D?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=BCrst=22's?= message of "Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:29:40 +0900") Organization: The Eyrie References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:40:51 -0800 Message-ID: <87d38jh9fg.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:40:53 -0000 "Martin J. D=C3=BCrst" writes: > Sorry, I don't understand this. There's certainly no way to tell from > the outside of a .txt file that there's anything other than US-ASCII > inside, but there is also no way to tell that there's anything other > than UTF-8 inside, and so on. With respect to .txt files, ASCII isn't > special in any way. There's a transition problem, in that RFC .txt files have always historically been ASCII. The maximally-conservative worry is that we have no idea where that information is embedded and what may be relying on it. The awkward but mostly backward-compatible thing to do would be to publish the text UTF-8 version as an additional format for the RFC (.utf8 or something) and continue to publish a .txt version that's ASCII-only (however one manages to mangle the UTF-8 characters to do so). I feel like that's probably overkill, but I can see the appeal in not breaking historical guarantees about the format of the RFC .txt files. --=20 Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sun Mar 11 03:50:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684D821F85F6 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:50:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.482 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.783, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hnID0gLfhVL3 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 77FA021F8569 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 03:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2012 10:50:07 -0000 Received: from p57A6EDE8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.237.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 11:50:07 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19JzV9OCs5JWc/rwGbNDe2o9amlJjU0e3u+5LA8r3 7vClT/o7d6zL3p Message-ID: <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:50:01 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:50:09 -0000 On 2012-03-11 07:45, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > On 2012/03/11 7:44, Larry Masinter wrote: >>> You could just use rfc2629.xslt and rfc2629toFop.xslt, which should >>> work fine with non-ASCII characters. >> >>> For "down-conversion" to the all-ASCII format we'd need a simple XSLT >>> that strips or converts the examples. >> >>> (Stripping will be easier :-) >> >> I'm afraid that I don't believe "stripping" is sufficient. For an >> example to be useful, it needs to use explicit notation. The >> ASCII-only version needs a *different* introductory section than the >> Unicode one, so I need a "alternative selection" syntax and not a >> "strip one" selection process. > > Alternatives can be achieved through stripping by either stripping one > or another of two pieces. So that's not too difficult. I'll look at this > technically after the upcoming submission deadline. Ideas for the > name(s) of the element(s) are appreciated. > > Regards, Martin. A very pragmatic approach would be to use xsl:when, and command line parameter, and let an XSLT processor do the work. Such as: ... ... That being said, the thought of having alternate texts makes me a bit uneasy; it would be great if we just could fix the base problem instead (the RFC format). Best regards, Julian From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Sun Mar 11 05:15:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76FC21F862A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:15:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.254 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tjxez4pW87Jx for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D833821F85A2 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q2BCExE2016033 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:14:59 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 327c_f34b_d26406d8_6b73_11e1_8056_001d096c5782; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:14:58 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:50715) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:15:03 +0900 Message-ID: <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:14:57 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:15:06 -0000 Hello Julian, On 2012/03/11 19:50, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-03-11 07:45, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > A very pragmatic approach would be to use xsl:when, and command line > parameter, and let an XSLT processor do the work. > > Such as: > > > > ... > > ... I'm essentially thinking about this, but as a preprocessing step. > That being said, the thought of having alternate texts makes me a bit > uneasy; it would be great if we just could fix the base problem instead > (the RFC format). Yes indeed. But maybe we need an example or two where people can see the benefits and the absence of any of the claimed problems. Regards, Martin. From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sun Mar 11 05:21:37 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF2A21F865F for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:21:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.228 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.529, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HlBD6QCC2Bjj for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F1F421F865D for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:21:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2012 12:21:31 -0000 Received: from p57A6EDE8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.237.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 13:21:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Q2twPZkPQ3qdvjZOoIdtEdubyvo2Ay5waV+jv0N sds1+2DCdzZSPF Message-ID: <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:21:25 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:21:37 -0000 On 2012-03-11 13:14, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > Hello Julian, > > On 2012/03/11 19:50, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2012-03-11 07:45, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > >> A very pragmatic approach would be to use xsl:when, and command line >> parameter, and let an XSLT processor do the work. >> >> Such as: >> >> >> >> ... >> >> ... > > I'm essentially thinking about this, but as a preprocessing step. Yes, that's what I meant as well. Just running XSLT as a preprocessor. >> That being said, the thought of having alternate texts makes me a bit >> uneasy; it would be great if we just could fix the base problem instead >> (the RFC format). > > Yes indeed. But maybe we need an example or two where people can see the > benefits and the absence of any of the claimed problems. I think the IRI spec is a very good example, because allowing "ü" would make such a big difference :-). People who think US-ASCII is sufficient really need to have a look at RFC 3987, for example. Best regards, Julian From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sun Mar 11 05:27:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E84E21F8679 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:27:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.037 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.337, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtfVV0gqUPnJ for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A94E21F8677 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2012 12:27:24 -0000 Received: from p57A6EDE8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.237.232] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 13:27:24 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18xtPU2+3gxDBkA7hbH4/jYFgq/6SuishkvVlNFv6 IsLK4hHDg+DxjO Message-ID: <4F5C9A27.3060901@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:27:19 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:27:26 -0000 On 2012-03-11 13:21, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-03-11 13:14, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >> Hello Julian, >> >> On 2012/03/11 19:50, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 2012-03-11 07:45, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >> >>> A very pragmatic approach would be to use xsl:when, and command line >>> parameter, and let an XSLT processor do the work. >>> >>> Such as: >>> >>> >>> >>> ... >>> >>> ... >> >> I'm essentially thinking about this, but as a preprocessing step. > > Yes, that's what I meant as well. Just running XSLT as a preprocessor. > ... Like that: pretest.xml
Martin Duerst. Martin Dürst.
ascii.xml: Run it: xsltproc pretest.xml ascii.xml Result:
Martin Duerst.
From johnl@iecc.com Sun Mar 11 08:32:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4756D21F871B for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:32:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.273 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEj+EWSO3TKf for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765BD21F8703 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 80383 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2012 15:32:47 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=139fe.4f5cc59f.k1203; bh=/qn0gWVeKjgffa89inSizBpsjAMl/iW1nficon8PQmI=; b=PmKFid+FGDdYqfN/oCe/1tV401+ghs6N+ZwXALuB2VXWN9zmgpjXZ1rLaIGc2opkr685tIqlM7+0bGSlB8AGjIZ8kiIsImybJnR7mExcL2ZJJcuofFB/mPAjxl0gNgnWw0qa7XwciytT+wjwjmg50kiCkgxIAHSIQ+C33FdGjAg= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 11 Mar 2012 15:32:25 -0000 Date: 11 Mar 2012 11:32:46 -0400 Message-ID: From: "John R. Levine" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?=22Martin_J=2E_D=C3=BCrst=22?=" In-Reply-To: <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Cleverness: None detected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:32:50 -0000 >> problems than they solve since there's no way to tell from the outside >> that there's anything other than ASCII inside. > > Sorry, I don't understand this. There's certainly no way to tell from the > outside of a .txt file that there's anything other than US-ASCII inside, but > there is also no way to tell that there's anything other than UTF-8 inside, > and so on. With respect to .txt files, ASCII isn't special in any way. All I-Ds and RFC TXT files since the beginning of time have contained only ASCII. (I'm ignoring the early hand-written ones and the few experimental Postscript ones.) If you're going to invent a mutant file format that contains ASCII mixed with non-ASCII please call it something else. I entirely agree that we need to do something about a more modern format for RFCs, but trying to sneak UTF-8 into the existing text isn't it. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly From tony.li@tony.li Sun Mar 11 11:13:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219CD21F84B8 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:13:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.466 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vk5XuORyrcMg for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF61B21F84FE for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kHJG1i0051zF43QA3JDveV; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:13:55 +0000 Received: from sjc-vpn6-104.cisco.com ([128.107.239.233]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kJDL1i00F52qHCY8kJDi1g; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:13:53 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tony Li In-Reply-To: <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:13:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> To: Julian Reschke X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:13:57 -0000 On Mar 11, 2012, at 5:21 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: >=20 > People who think US-ASCII is sufficient really need to have a look at = RFC 3987, for example. Guys, This is not the right list for this unending debate. Tony From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sun Mar 11 11:52:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F5421F8656 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:52:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.094 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.495, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viMVlLt25Dig for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BE43421F864F for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2012 18:52:00 -0000 Received: from p57A6E004.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [87.166.224.4] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2012 19:52:00 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX183Ukoub6Q3UgiPArqnbWgja2AcyxgouCoQIRnIR6 uGbyMfkldCOEP4 Message-ID: <4F5CF44B.1010803@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 19:51:55 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John R. Levine" References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:52:02 -0000 On 2012-03-11 16:32, John R. Levine wrote: >>> problems than they solve since there's no way to tell from the outside >>> that there's anything other than ASCII inside. >> >> Sorry, I don't understand this. There's certainly no way to tell from >> the outside of a .txt file that there's anything other than US-ASCII >> inside, but there is also no way to tell that there's anything other >> than UTF-8 inside, and so on. With respect to .txt files, ASCII isn't >> special in any way. > > All I-Ds and RFC TXT files since the beginning of time have contained > only ASCII. (I'm ignoring the early hand-written ones and the few > experimental Postscript ones.) If you're going to invent a mutant file > format that contains ASCII mixed with non-ASCII please call it something > else. Actually, when we discussed this last time, we found a few RFCs that contained ISO-8859-1. > I entirely agree that we need to do something about a more modern format > for RFCs, but trying to sneak UTF-8 into the existing text isn't it. I believe it would be a huge step forward, and that it would solve some of the problems we have nicely. But let's discuss this in Paris. Best regards, Julian From nico@cryptonector.com Sun Mar 11 14:39:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3328821F854C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.212 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.212 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.235, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LipTY56qj24 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B77A21F84DC for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327312C2058 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=n0/QxHYKNUYJmaxdEc8oZ m2hh8iMn0PnUYGn6jTJQAuFI5r4Lm3Sr7wXnanRxO3Q1Uif+bR2xmPsbRt9as3C/ fxHjs5p9V/hWE656FDXDGprCQYeFyAj69KieGwefTWCHEtVV56wzmougv0YGdFwr D9d9V4rjV7LFmOWKoU1/4s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=mdFf3jVY8T8eaEJAZkSL mXQfq8g=; b=ucmdz4yhYqbOs1bk/rGB1N4yy50XC6SSVfuw3a2B1Y0gKCxY7GMw wG0II8m45tvviVTgweyVYPFRDARal7UU67VGaL0OPXaRjYPclce9hRn/fAPXJvFA BBAA54+kxjajFlTH+eU5uZOMclNkVT8IMzsqY9TqWCBuJQrWmuSHfcc= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1942E2C200C for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so4547809dak.31 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.40 with SMTP id or8mr14839527pbb.34.1331501979609; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:39:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Tony Li Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Julian Reschke , xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:39:53 -0000 On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tony Li wrote: > This is not the right list for this unending debate. What list should we use for this debate? But I think this one is the perfect list for it because its subscribers are clearly intimate with the relevant issues and details and are already opining. The main IETF list is too large an audience at this point, though I agree that any decision to move to relax the restriction of IETF .txt files to ASCII should eventually take place on the main IETF list. Nico -- From nico@cryptonector.com Sun Mar 11 14:43:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F6D21F84E4 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:43:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.209 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.232, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KsZpGLDm6caC for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402B421F84E0 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1680F54058 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:43:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=maLMNrCJsaALFhP6gYiKym89x4wBwJPwGJ0QBieUf3Hx EZK6RDhlOI3Vsd9bnm98YA8OLbj5xloob4RU4bPMkyfInxNXBQZ07aA8iC2Fz+YF A4YLN6DTFQkaFZRuLHjOUOP/jNRX7v5+Pl+siyj7FCHDV4/EOD5MSUPP6gd0tss= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=skoW3n4MxOgdPbD5JqbcJn0Qf4o=; b=Z8dnAHQPKpH +kSGjEGEsp3RJ9k43b+MKHuv/JhlRvtr76JCi+tFceLJCfJWZuk3HUFfPzMyzPDl PG/ZjA0xBFDzfw8ELO+hijDrOJ65Xqqd56T3MmpzMQO6K6K17dKiITRnS/0p7kv5 iDx8CTxMhzNgHWINSgwuasuptwiSZTjA= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a35.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3ED154057 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so4551241dak.31 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:43:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.220.7 with SMTP id ps7mr15478120pbc.160.1331501750861; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:35:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d38jh9fg.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <87d38jh9fg.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:35:50 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Russ Allbery Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:43:50 -0000 On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Martin J. D=C3=BCrst" writes: > >> Sorry, I don't understand this. There's certainly no way to tell from >> the outside of a .txt file that there's anything other than US-ASCII >> inside, but there is also no way to tell that there's anything other >> than UTF-8 inside, and so on. With respect to .txt files, ASCII isn't >> special in any way. > > There's a transition problem, in that RFC .txt files have always > historically been ASCII. =C2=A0The maximally-conservative worry is that w= e have > no idea where that information is embedded and what may be relying on it. > > The awkward but mostly backward-compatible thing to do would be to publis= h > the text UTF-8 version as an additional format for the RFC (.utf8 or > something) and continue to publish a .txt version that's ASCII-only > (however one manages to mangle the UTF-8 characters to do so). =C2=A0I fe= el > like that's probably overkill, but I can see the appeal in not breaking > historical guarantees about the format of the RFC .txt files. I think the fear of putting non-ASCII UTF-8 in .txt is way, *way* overblown. What might break? Not any software or computer system These .txt files are intended to be consumed by *humans*. If their terminals are in a non-UTF-8 locale then the non-ASCII in the .txt files will display as garbage, and then the user will understand that something is wrong, and eventually figure out what to do to fix it. The terminals will *not* crashover non-ASCII UTF-8 encoding, -- if any did it's a bug that they must be tripping over so frequently that it's been fixed already. The obvious retort to our desire for a UTF-8 .txt format is that if you want UTF-8 then use HTML or PDF. I reject such a retort on account of my finding it much easier to read RFCs in text format on a terminal, in screen, with my favorite regexp-capable pager. The obvious retort to my preference for plain [UTF-8] text is that it's just that: a preference, that it's time to move on, or that I should use a text-based browser. And my retort to that one is that we already have the infrastructure for plain text, so supporting this preference is not hard. IMO it's time to say that RFC/STD/FYI and Internet-Draft .txt files are UTF-8. It's 2012. It's been a long time (in Internet scale) since our windowing systems and the terminals we run in them (and screen readers, and...) learned to render UTF-8. Nico -- From masinter@adobe.com Sun Mar 11 14:52:15 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7583E21F8769 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.515 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k112So5VtLuz for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod6og102.obsmtp.com (exprod6og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4266721F8764 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob102.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT10eis3mLiEKvqk2gxa0jzoIiTpRqMVW@postini.com; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:13 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2BLq8vq024470; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub02.corp.adobe.com (nahub02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.98]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q2BLq7Pl028675; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nahub02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.98]) with mapi; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:06 -0700 From: Larry Masinter To: Nico Williams , Russ Allbery Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:52:05 -0700 Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) Thread-Index: Acz/0BdspqJJpokXQB6PXB11lYgNYQAAOrZA Message-ID: References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <87d38jh9fg.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:52:15 -0000 R29zaCBJJ20gcmVhbGx5IHNvcnJ5IHRvIGhhdmUgaW5mZWN0ZWQgdGhpcyBsaXN0IHdpdGggdGhl IGRlYmF0ZS4NCg0KSSB3YXMganVzdCBhc2tpbmcgYWJvdXQgY29uZGl0aW9uYWwgWE1MMlJGQyB0 byBjcmVhdGUgc29tZSBlYXNpZXItdG8tcmVhZCBQREYgZmlsZXMuIFBsZWFzZSBwbGVhc2UgcGxl YXNlIHN0b3AgdGFsa2luZyBhYm91dCBjaGFuZ2luZyB0aGUgUkZDIGZvcm1hdCBvciBhbnl0aGlu ZyBlbHNlIG9uIHRoaXMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PyBJJ20gcmVhbGx5IHJlYWxseSBzb3JyeS4NCg0K UGxlYXNlIQ0KDQpMYXJyeQ0KDQoNCg0KDQo= From masinter@adobe.com Sun Mar 11 16:47:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED3D21F8644 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.678 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8BClhhaXo2e for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod6og104.obsmtp.com (exprod6og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A8B21F863E for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob104.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT105lsirS8p4oLf9TqydBfjUOvqT1d66@postini.com; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:36 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2BNlWvq027526; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q2BNlVMM019181; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:32 -0700 From: Larry Masinter To: Nico Williams Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:47:30 -0700 Thread-Topic: Perhaps a better venue for "RFC format" discussion is... Thread-Index: Acz/4VKcZZClAWhgTtmB7wKbYwO2qw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: [xml2rfc] Perhaps a better venue for "RFC format" discussion is... X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:47:55 -0000 aHR0cDovL09sZC5uYWJibGUuY29tL1JGQy1mb3JtYXQlM0EtYW55LWRpc2N1c3Npb25zLWF0LXRo ZS1wYXJpcy1JRVRGLS10bzMzMzM0NjIxLmh0bWwgDQoNCmlzIHRoZSBkaXNjdXNzaW9uIHRocmVh ZC4NCg0KUmZjLWludGVyZXN0QHJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnDQoNCklzIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Qu DQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQo= From johnl@iecc.com Sun Mar 11 18:55:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8406F21F853A for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:55:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.424 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZ5lI1Ejan29 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F21821F84D2 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27073 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2012 01:55:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=69c0.4f5d5776.k1203; bh=tSc14Wby4fpGyQPM3aZFqYebCf8FE/aRbL37ExDSnkM=; b=aISpIPSBJGLCQPGm/cZNPI5wnLUIfkUNWpJD6ryWmt2nsdi2Zg8ilQbfdw0aIEnffVW/YfQmuVRLTF7QSTArzA42n/cyzrmAySM2bplk/cpQlvLRBpq9+rJr55u4Gv/hFvKBlskkmxQzBfF7vfdMGrBKRKd52klNj3s2SchiNbk= VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1); 12 Mar 2012 01:54:40 -0000 Date: 11 Mar 2012 21:55:01 -0400 Message-ID: From: "John R. Levine" To: "Julian Reschke" In-Reply-To: <4F5CF44B.1010803@gmx.de> References: <20120310204451.51674.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F5C5464.7060201@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5CF44B.1010803@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Cleverness: None detected MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:55:04 -0000 > Actually, when we discussed this last time, we found a few RFCs that > contained ISO-8859-1. I just took a look. I see a little non-ASCII, much of which appears to be a mistake. The most recent RFC with non-ASCII text is 2875, which includes these lines. (Since my editor doesn't know what character set it's supposed to be, it's likely smashed even though my MUA handles UTF-8): TBS: the ^otext"o for computing the SHA-1 HMAC. should be the "text" for computing the SHA-1 HMAC. Signature verification requires CAAEs private key, the CA certificate and the generated Certification Request. should be requires CA's private key Neither of those look deliberate, probably some junk from MS Word that leaked through. RFC 2708 has similar junk that appears to have leaked: assigned IDAEs, there is a limited amount of clear text information provided during submission for use by the Job MIB. should be assigned ID's One of the few I can find with what deliberate looking non-ASCII is 2557 which includes: E with acute accent becomes 'E.
E with acute accent becomes É.

In that first line the 'E is an accented E in some character set. >> I entirely agree that we need to do something about a more modern format >> for RFCs, but trying to sneak UTF-8 into the existing text isn't it. > > I believe it would be a huge step forward, and that it would solve some of > the problems we have nicely. I think the effort involved for the RFC production center to make their tools handle UTF-8 reliably would be disproportionate for the benefit. There are a lot of issues beyond non-Roman names, and I think it would be better to ask them to upgrade once, not N times. The BOF is at 1710 on Tuesday. It's at the same time as marf so I may have to run back and forth. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Wed Mar 21 04:07:23 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6010F21F864B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:07:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.678, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HfuT0vBCvQzT for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96DA21F863B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q2LB7Ehe020947 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:07:14 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 5172_f7fc_03f64f10_7346_11e1_9bce_001d096c5782; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:07:14 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:40027) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:07:19 +0900 Message-ID: <4F69B65D.6030704@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:07:09 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> <4F5C9A27.3060901@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F5C9A27.3060901@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: xml2rfc list , Paul Hoffman Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:07:23 -0000 Hello Julian, others, I have started working in this direction. I have used an external transform, not inline ,.... But with XSLT, I hit a rather hard wall because author names and the like are in attributes. I think I could produce these with inlined s with then contain , but that's blowing up the source more and more. Regards, Martin. On 2012/03/11 21:27, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-03-11 13:21, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2012-03-11 13:14, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >>> Hello Julian, >>> >>> On 2012/03/11 19:50, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>> On 2012-03-11 07:45, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >>> >>>> A very pragmatic approach would be to use xsl:when, and command line >>>> parameter, and let an XSLT processor do the work. >>>> >>>> Such as: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>> ... >>> >>> I'm essentially thinking about this, but as a preprocessing step. >> >> Yes, that's what I meant as well. Just running XSLT as a preprocessor. >> ... > > Like that: > > pretest.xml > >

xsl:version="1.0"> > > > > Martin Duerst. > > > > > Martin Dürst. > > > >
> > ascii.xml: > > > > Run it: > > xsltproc pretest.xml ascii.xml > > Result: > > >
> Martin Duerst. >
> From pander@users.sourceforge.net Thu Mar 22 02:19:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EF821F85F4 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:19:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.504 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5eEtKYo6C4H for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nodachi.mjopr.nl (nodachi.mjopr.nl [83.96.169.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B29021F85F0 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (ip235-130-212-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl [87.212.130.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sander) by nodachi.mjopr.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E975F760 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:19:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:19:00 +0100 From: Pander User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xml2rfc] Allow URL for input X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:35:03 -0000 Hi all, Could you please allow an URL for input at http://xml.resource.org/ Can it please be implemented that I can give someone a link such as http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?input=http://blah.com/rfc.xml&output=html and upon viewing this link, one will see the HTML rendering of the RFC in XML which is provided as a parameter in the link. Thanks, Pander From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu Mar 22 06:17:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDE321F8587 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.28 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.28 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.681, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPFZb2ph8hVX for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A1AEA21F856F for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2012 13:17:49 -0000 Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2012 14:17:49 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18TQXQAQCoTyVNqyRHqJzCljINoec30fhDekD83Uu 4XOqnggr23ijNW Message-ID: <4F6B267A.3010303@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:17:46 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pander References: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Allow URL for input X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:17:53 -0000 On 2012-03-22 10:19, Pander wrote: > Hi all, > > Could you please allow an URL for input at http://xml.resource.org/ > > Can it please be implemented that I can give someone a link such as > > http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?input=http://blah.com/rfc.xml&output=html > and upon viewing this link, one will see the HTML rendering of the RFC > in XML which is provided as a parameter in the link. > ... Have you tried rfc2629.xslt? If all you need is conversion to HTML it will run completely in the browser, and you won't have to use xml2rfc.org at all. Best regards, Julian From pander@users.sourceforge.net Thu Mar 22 06:27:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134CC21F861B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:27:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.428 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETuJAKORE6mC for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nodachi.mjopr.nl (nodachi.mjopr.nl [83.96.169.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C8321F861E for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:27:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (ip235-130-212-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl [87.212.130.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sander) by nodachi.mjopr.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC4F65FE0E; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:27:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F6B28C1.3080403@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:27:29 +0100 From: Pander User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> <4F6B267A.3010303@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F6B267A.3010303@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Allow URL for input X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:27:35 -0000 On 2012-03-22 14:17, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-03-22 10:19, Pander wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Could you please allow an URL for input at http://xml.resource.org/ >> >> Can it please be implemented that I can give someone a link such as >> >> http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?input=http://blah.com/rfc.xml&output=html >> >> and upon viewing this link, one will see the HTML rendering of the RFC >> in XML which is provided as a parameter in the link. >> ... > > Have you tried rfc2629.xslt? No If all you need is conversion to HTML it > will run completely in the browser, and you won't have to use > xml2rfc.org at all. What do I have to do exactly. Including or does not work. Also when I do that. xtml2rfc doesn't work anymore. > > Best regards, Julian From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu Mar 22 06:38:11 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B2821F860B for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.266 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmqHs7DQiP3W for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CFFFC21F8615 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2012 13:38:08 -0000 Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.140]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 22 Mar 2012 14:38:08 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/MV/U0H7zMn8x4Ik62YXXVfQPSn4kRMWei5mfYWJ wRsq6d0X1Jzrsq Message-ID: <4F6B2B3A.6020807@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:38:02 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pander References: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> <4F6B267A.3010303@gmx.de> <4F6B28C1.3080403@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6B28C1.3080403@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Allow URL for input X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:38:11 -0000 On 2012-03-22 14:27, Pander wrote: > On 2012-03-22 14:17, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2012-03-22 10:19, Pander wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Could you please allow an URL for input at http://xml.resource.org/ >>> >>> Can it please be implemented that I can give someone a link such as >>> >>> http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?input=http://blah.com/rfc.xml&output=html >>> >>> and upon viewing this link, one will see the HTML rendering of the RFC >>> in XML which is provided as a parameter in the link. >>> ... >> >> Have you tried rfc2629.xslt? > > No > > If all you need is conversion to HTML it >> will run completely in the browser, and you won't have to use >> xml2rfc.org at all. > > What do I have to do exactly. Including > > or See . > href='http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/doc/rfc/authors/rfc2629.xslt' ?> > does not work. The former should, if you have the file rfc2629.xslt next to your XML. You *might* have to disable noscript or similar browser extensions. > Also when I do that. xtml2rfc doesn't work anymore. It should. Details? From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Thu Mar 22 23:39:47 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3E821E8037 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:39:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.87 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.680, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuOn7dVExSjw for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E661621E8013 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q2N6dh06002575 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:39:43 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 05c1_cd1f_f9417720_74b2_11e1_9d11_001d096c5782; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:39:42 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:50649) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:39:47 +0900 Message-ID: <4F6C1AA9.8060408@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:39:37 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <87r4x1nt7e.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> <4F5B9CA0.5010507@gmx.de> <91106A17-573C-4893-A378-7411A18E281E@vpnc.org> <4F5BD113.30107@gmx.de> <4F5C4A1B.5050809@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C8359.9070108@gmx.de> <4F5C9741.5080109@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <4F5C98C5.7070306@gmx.de> <4F5C9A27.3060901@gmx.de> <4F69B65D.6030704@it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <4F69B65D.6030704@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: xml2rfc list Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Generating HTML and PDF with Unicode (and diagrams?) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 06:39:47 -0000 Just for the record, I dealt with the problem I mentioned below by adding parallel attributes (e.g. ifullname in parallel to fullname). Regards, Martin. On 2012/03/21 20:07, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > Hello Julian, others, > > I have started working in this direction. I have used an external > transform, not inline ,.... But with XSLT, I hit a rather > hard wall because author names and the like are in attributes. I think I > could produce these with inlined s with then contain > , but that's blowing up the source more and more. > > Regards, Martin. > > On 2012/03/11 21:27, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2012-03-11 13:21, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 2012-03-11 13:14, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >>>> Hello Julian, >>>> >>>> On 2012/03/11 19:50, Julian Reschke wrote: >>>>> On 2012-03-11 07:45, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: >>>> >>>>> A very pragmatic approach would be to use xsl:when, and command line >>>>> parameter, and let an XSLT processor do the work. >>>>> >>>>> Such as: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>> >>>> I'm essentially thinking about this, but as a preprocessing step. >>> >>> Yes, that's what I meant as well. Just running XSLT as a preprocessor. >>> ... >> >> Like that: >> >> pretest.xml >> >>
> xsl:version="1.0"> >> >> >> >> Martin Duerst. >> >> >> >> >> Martin Dürst. >> >> >> >>
>> >> ascii.xml: >> >> >> >> Run it: >> >> xsltproc pretest.xml ascii.xml >> >> Result: >> >> >>
>> Martin Duerst. >>
>> > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc From pander@users.sourceforge.net Fri Mar 23 12:17:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A09721E803F for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.454 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f0uzvkl3yg4t for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nodachi.mjopr.nl (nodachi.mjopr.nl [83.96.169.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AC721E802D for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (ip235-130-212-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl [87.212.130.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sander) by nodachi.mjopr.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 262AD5FAF4; Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:18:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F6CCC5A.6070607@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 20:17:46 +0100 From: Pander User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke References: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> <4F6B267A.3010303@gmx.de> <4F6B28C1.3080403@users.sourceforge.net> <4F6B2B3A.6020807@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4F6B2B3A.6020807@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Allow URL for input X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:17:53 -0000 On 2012-03-22 14:38, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-03-22 14:27, Pander wrote: >> On 2012-03-22 14:17, Julian Reschke wrote: >>> On 2012-03-22 10:19, Pander wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Could you please allow an URL for input at http://xml.resource.org/ >>>> >>>> Can it please be implemented that I can give someone a link such as >>>> >>>> http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?input=http://blah.com/rfc.xml&output=html >>>> >>>> >>>> and upon viewing this link, one will see the HTML rendering of the RFC >>>> in XML which is provided as a parameter in the link. >>>> ... >>> >>> Have you tried rfc2629.xslt? >> >> No >> >> If all you need is conversion to HTML it >>> will run completely in the browser, and you won't have to use >>> xml2rfc.org at all. >> >> What do I have to do exactly. Including >> >> or > > See > . > > >> > href='http://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/doc/rfc/authors/rfc2629.xslt' ?> >> does not work. > > The former should, if you have the file rfc2629.xslt next to your XML. > You *might* have to disable noscript or similar browser extensions. > >> Also when I do that. xtml2rfc doesn't work anymore. > > It should. Details? > It is working now with a local file, I interchanged the lines with xml and xml-stylesheet by accident :S When I use a remote file, I get in Firefox Error loading stylesheet: An unknown error has occurred (805303f4)http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629.xslt But I have indeed several add-ons that trigger on cross site scripting. So I added to my Makefile wget -N http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629.xslt and it works fine now. Thanks, Pander From tony@att.com Sat Mar 24 07:21:43 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD7B21F8725 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:21:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R1pVVPeAWllq for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com [209.65.160.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF4721F871D for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.20.145] (EHLO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 578dd6f4.0.2117586.00-482.5826241.nbfkord-smmo04.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:21:42 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 4f6dd876711e8dda-7428ae9114f55eddb9a4fede3df0c1908885b76f Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2OELf7U019253 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:21:41 -0400 Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2OELXBt019236 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:21:34 -0400 Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:21:05 -0400 Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2OEL4k7018589 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:21:04 -0400 Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (mailgw1.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2OEKxvs018354 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:21:00 -0400 Received: from [130.10.100.223] (vpn-130-10-100-223.vpn.swst.att.com[130.10.100.223]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120324141814gw1004or8ne> (Authid: tony); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:18:15 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [130.10.100.223] Message-ID: <4F6DD849.2080908@att.com> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:20:57 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pander References: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <4F6AEE84.4090602@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-RSA-Action: allow X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.145] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=_XNIERSpaAcA:10 a=ftvWwXIVLBAA:10 a=1yqMZdZYV2] X-AnalysisOut: [8A:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:1] X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=ZRNLZ4dFUbCvG8UMqPvVAA==:17 a=rqrk_YMJAAAA:8 a=mLTjNWv] X-AnalysisOut: [KAAAA:8 a=zLfNNPXXrF7bvh84s3wA:9 a=bsucHfTl-1ylxCQm-O4A:7 ] X-AnalysisOut: [a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10] Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Allow URL for input X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:21:43 -0000 The experimental page under xml.resource.org now allows entering a URL in place of uploading a file. I hope you find it useful. Tony On 3/22/2012 5:19 AM, Pander wrote: > Could you please allow an URL for input at http://xml.resource.org/ > > Can it please be implemented that I can give someone a link such as > > http://xml.resource.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?input=http://blah.com/rfc.xml&output=html > and upon viewing this link, one will see the HTML rendering of the RFC > in XML which is provided as a parameter in the link.