From LMM@acm.org Sat Jan 21 13:04:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE7321F84E1 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKl5bDBo3CuZ for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod6og108.obsmtp.com (exprod6og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B2721F84A1 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob108.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTxsoV8rkCn3SQk7rtVXCc1u0gsx2M1Rg@postini.com; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:29 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q0LL2S0Y026223; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:02:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q0LL4KPl005192; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from masinterW7 (10.176.141.60) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.192.1; Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:19 -0800 From: Larry Masinter To: Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:04:18 -0800 Message-ID: <00c301ccd880$3e701c90$bb5055b0$@acm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CCD83D.304D9FE0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AczYgBOyemUMHfvCS7yMkr7aQXC6cg== Content-Language: en-us Subject: [Uri-review] 'duri' and 'tdb' => Experimental (= Provisional registration) X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 18:36:44 -0000 ------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CCD83D.304D9FE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10 This has been kicking around for more than 10 years as an Internet Draft. I was asked at least for something more stable, and I want to take this off my queue. The URI scheme registry doesn't have an 'experimental' section, so I think these should be noted as 'provisional'. Larry ------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CCD83D.304D9FE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

http://to= ols.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10

 

This has = been kicking around for more than 10 years as an Internet = Draft.

I was asked at least for = something more stable, and I want to take this

off my queue.

 

The URI = scheme registry doesn’t have an ‘experimental’ = section, so I think these should be noted as ‘provisional’. =

 

Larry

=  

------=_NextPart_000_00C4_01CCD83D.304D9FE0-- From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp Sun Jan 22 17:25:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3D421F85EC for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:25:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.495 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.705, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twXWADaJ6snG for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:25:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669AE21F85EA for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:25:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta01.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id q0N1PDwZ004156 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:25:13 +0900 Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 5b16_35a7_19770194_4561_11e1_aca5_001d096c5782; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:25:13 +0900 Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:54916) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:25:16 +0900 Message-ID: <4F1CB6F7.8070100@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:25:11 +0900 From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry Masinter References: <00c301ccd880$3e701c90$bb5055b0$@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <00c301ccd880$3e701c90$bb5055b0$@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: uri-review@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Uri-review] 'duri' and 'tdb' => Experimental (= Provisional registration) X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:25:21 -0000 On 2012/01/22 6:04, Larry Masinter wrote: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10 > This has been kicking around for more than 10 years as an Internet Draft. > > I was asked at least for something more stable, and I want to take this > > off my queue. > The URI scheme registry doesn't have an 'experimental' section, so I think > these should be noted as 'provisional'. My understanding is that they should be registered as provisional already at the moment an ID is submitted. For an experimental RFC, I think either provisional or permanent would be okay. In any case, please move forward with this towards RFC. Regards, Martin. From stpeter@stpeter.im Wed Jan 25 19:06:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C99D11E8097 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:06:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.528 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cq5wbvz8lebC for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:06:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A23211E8096 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:06:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B24D540058; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:16:38 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4F20C34A.4030001@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:06:50 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= References: <00c301ccd880$3e701c90$bb5055b0$@acm.org> <4F1CB6F7.8070100@it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <4F1CB6F7.8070100@it.aoyama.ac.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: uri-review@ietf.org, Larry Masinter Subject: Re: [Uri-review] 'duri' and 'tdb' => Experimental (= Provisional registration) X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:06:53 -0000 On 1/22/12 6:25 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > On 2012/01/22 6:04, Larry Masinter wrote: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10 > >> This has been kicking around for more than 10 years as an Internet Draft. >> >> I was asked at least for something more stable, and I want to take this >> >> off my queue. > >> The URI scheme registry doesn't have an 'experimental' section, so I >> think >> these should be noted as 'provisional'. > > My understanding is that they should be registered as provisional > already at the moment an ID is submitted. For an experimental RFC, I > think either provisional or permanent would be okay. > > In any case, please move forward with this towards RFC. I could still sponsor this during my time on the IESG, but I would need a document shepherd, as well as a PROTO writeup in the next week. That might be too tight a deadline. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/