From nobody Tue Apr 22 01:21:42 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021E11A0147 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:21:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.772 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tt3IEJWlKVOq for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCB61A0162 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jsaldanapc (6.Red-88-4-4.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.4.4.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s3M8L76V031716 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:21:08 +0200 From: "Jose Saldana" To: Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:21:10 +0200 Message-ID: <015c01cf5e03$d1b0ee20$7512ca60$@unizar.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_015D_01CF5E14.953B6BD0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac9eA8xlVHgvaHhDRZeMMS4uZyngVg== Content-Language: es X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcmtf/SPlwKSFMEGDeizDhuN-rGuHkvEM Subject: [tcmtf] Some objectives for TCM-TF X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows $TCMTF$ discussion list" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:21:41 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_015D_01CF5E14.953B6BD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Just to let you know about some things we are thinking about. This would be a list of objectives regarding TCM-TF: - We have contacted guifi.net (a community network in Spain) in order to perform a study about the potential savings to be obtained with TCM-TF. It is a wide network based on Wi-Fi, so small packet flows are very inefficient. We will analyze anonymized traffic traces, in order to find flows sharing a path including a number of hops. - We are thinking about building a first TCM-TF implementation. I have found some open source implementations of the protocols involved (e.g. ROHC, https://launchpad.net/rohc). It also exists a Linux package including PPP over L2TP (pppol2tp). - We should start thinking about the "negotiation protocol" More ideas? Thanks, Jose ------=_NextPart_000_015D_01CF5E14.953B6BD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

Just to let you know about some things we are thinking = about. This would be a list of objectives regarding = TCM-TF:

- We have contacted guifi.net (a community network in = Spain) in order to perform a study about the potential savings to be = obtained with TCM-TF. It is a wide network based on Wi-Fi, so small = packet flows are very inefficient. We will analyze anonymized traffic = traces, in order to find flows sharing a path including a number of = hops.

- We are thinking about building a first TCM-TF = implementation. I have found some open source implementations of the = protocols involved (e.g. ROHC, https://launchpad.net/rohc). It also = exists a Linux package including PPP over L2TP = (pppol2tp).

- We should start thinking about the “negotiation = protocol”

More ideas?

Thanks,

Jose

------=_NextPart_000_015D_01CF5E14.953B6BD0--