From nei.silva@vivax.com.br Fri Oct 30 20:41:13 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8633A67F5 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:41:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BOJA8pztY8IF for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5A63A67C0 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta0am02.vivax.com.br (mta0am02.vivax.com.br [200.246.46.178]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n9V3fRWg061670 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:41:28 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nei.silva@vivax.com.br) Received: from neibala (unknown [187.3.170.199]) by mta0am02.vivax.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4959D478038; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:41:14 -0200 (BRST) Message-ID: From: "Claudinei \(Nei\) - Net - Vivax" To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@core3.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:40:11 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0026_01CA59CB.15BCAC40" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091030-0, 30/10/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-vivax.com.br-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-vivax.com.br-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-vivax.com.br-MailScanner-SpamScore: sss X-vivax.com.br-MailScanner-From: nei.silva@vivax.com.br X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 08:11:59 -0800 Subject: [smime] Fw: Encryption X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:14:10 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01CA59CB.15BCAC40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Encryption=20 Have you moved or know where to find the DLL to work with encryption= format DES (Data Encryption Standard), the intention was to work with vb.n= et, more if you are in another language I try to do the conversion.=20 Format HSM (Host Security Module), where the customer uses the FK from Form= Key Components.=20 With the following formats after=20 Key Length =3D 1 Single length=20 Key Type =3D 001=20 Key Scheme Z =3D Single Length key encrypted using Ansi x9.17 methods=20 Key Component Type =3D X XOR Clear=20 Key Number of Components 3=20 See example=20 password: 5537 is encrypted 57DB18B4AFDE4855 (16 characters) where the key = was used C44CEF2502C475E5 (where he went to the check value as 90B34B).=20 =20 --=20 Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv=EDrus e acredita-se estar livre de perigo. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01CA59CB.15BCAC40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Encryption

       Have y= ou=20 moved or know where to find the DLL to work with encryption format DES (Dat= a=20 Encryption Standard), the intention was to work with vb.net, more if you ar= e in=20 another language I try to do the conversion.

Format HSM (Host Secur= ity=20 Module), where the customer uses the FK from Form Key Components.

W= ith=20 the following formats after

Key Length =3D 1 Single length
Key = Type =3D=20 001
Key Scheme Z =3D Single Length key encrypted using Ansi x9.17 metho= ds=20
Key Component Type =3D X XOR Clear
Key Number of Components 3=20


See example
password: 5537 is encrypted 57DB18B4AFDE4855 (1= 6=20 characters) where the key was used C44CEF2502C475E5 (where he went to the c= heck=20 value as 90B34B).

 


--
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv=EDrus e=20
acredita-se estar livre de perigo. ------=_NextPart_000_0026_01CA59CB.15BCAC40-- From wwwrun@core3.amsl.com Wed Nov 11 10:45:03 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@ietf.org Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id DD7053A6AEF; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:45:03 -0800 (PST) X-idtracker: yes From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Message-Id: <20091111184503.DD7053A6AEF@core3.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:45:03 -0800 (PST) Cc: smime chair , Internet Architecture Board , smime mailing list , RFC Editor Subject: [smime] Document Action: 'New ASN.1 Modules for CMS and S/MIME' to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:45:04 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'New ASN.1 Modules for CMS and S/MIME ' as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Tim Polk and Pasi Eronen. A URL of this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1-07.txt Technical Summary The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) format, and many associated formats, are expressed using ASN.1. The current ASN.1 modules conform to the 1988 version of ASN.1. This document updates those ASN.1 modules to conform to the 2002 version of ASN.1. There are no bits-on-the-wire changes to any of the formats; this is simply a change to the syntax. Working Group Summary This ID was discussed on the SMIME WG mailing list and at IETF 69, 70, and 71 (SMIME hasn't met since IETF 71). All SMIME WG Last Call issues have been resolved. Discussion during SMIME WG Last Call demonstrated working group consensus. This document has SMIME WG support. Note that the issue raised in PKIX on this document's sister document draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-05.txt (obsolete vs update) was not an issue in the SMIME WG. However, it is expected that whatever the result is that the SMIME WG ID will be on the same track. Document Quality This document obsoletes/updates a number of RFCs from the SMIME WG. The quality of the draft is comparable in quality to its predecessor. Personnel Sean Turner is the document Shepherd. Tim Polk is the responsible Security Area AD. From A.Hoenes@TR-Sys.de Fri Nov 13 08:39:44 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smime@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: smime@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506B63A67F4 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:39:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.079 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.828, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6IU9S6zfw0Qy for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4323A687C for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:39:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA130330359; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:39:19 +0100 Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id RAA12392; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:39:18 +0100 (MEZ) From: Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= Message-Id: <200911131639.RAA12392@TR-Sys.de> To: turners@ieca.com, smime@ietf.org Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0100 (MEZ) X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=hp-roman8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [smime] draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat X-BeenThere: smime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: SMIME Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:39:44 -0000 Folks, RFC 5208 has been published as an Informational RFC with the intent to transfer change control for PKCS #8 to the IETF and subsequently bring it to the Standards Track. draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat, in the current -02 version aims at Standards Track and Updating RFC 5208, while keeping that RFC as a Normative Reference. That does not seem to be a viable option. Given that, stripped off boilerplate text, authors' information, and References, the whole prose text of RFC 5208 amounts to only roughly four (4) pages, whereas the draft already exceeds that volume by a factor of two, I strongly suggest to re-write the draft as a full replacement for RFC 5208, thereby bringing it onto the Standards Track, as 'promised' by the IESG Note in RFC 5208. Kind regards, Alfred HÎnes. -- +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes | Alfred Hoenes Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys. | | Gerlinger Strasse 12 | Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18 | | D-71254 Ditzingen | E-Mail: ah@TR-Sys.de | +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+