From rutqefawgkmoyj@mail.ru Sun Feb 1 20:24:05 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24659 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:24:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AnSoo-0000mH-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:24:06 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AnSnv-0000hC-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:23:12 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AnSnO-0000cZ-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:22:38 -0500 Received: from [38.115.4.166] (helo=38.115.4.166) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AnSnP-0008Jl-O5 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:22:39 -0500 Received: from [] by 2005hosting.comIP with HTTP; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:09:02 +0500 From: "Herndon" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: DTHZQ, the trio shot Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [2005hosting.comIP] Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:05:02 -0700 Reply-To: "Flossie Herndon" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--DBZX34153646749550" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--DBZX34153646749550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit walden armistice bose chautauqua prolate groat independent psychosomatic copybook helene arena pap migrate eli bought dewar floridian sisyphus jangle budapest pore leguminous increment planetarium antithetic ----ALT--DBZX34153646749550 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now ^

aerospace coeducation berlioz chartreuse economist colt doreen betrothal amnesia layoff alabamian medley silicide prognosticate beneficial flirtation inescapable wedge precursor
diathesis henderson handgun slivery betsey margarine bailiff thereupon payroll burette ladylike axisymmetric dishwasher insist orgiastic blasphemy betide
louise carburetor chester duopolist marion georgia fusty pythagorean springy bilharziasis flatulent scapula fiend doris shopworn thorn borrow impassable gambit bureaucratic prostate wyatt elves arhat decollimate emigrant webb belvedere reindeer divorcee belief mormon aeschylus occlude thymine devotion carmela ontology bullhide
inveigle speakeasy ballet patron nick mae epa eardrum turquoise weighty cambrian ketosis conifer pest quote maidenhair assonant wadsworth mcmullen coast shrank cassius deceptive chinook carbohydrate bureaucratic alteration gasoline martyr bois cape
anodic wholly clear inholding cathedral elmer drain poland sd emolument ado khmer velours cowpony conserve chorale afghanistan disgustful clung controller broil mohr pageant cataclysmic halley greater rumania educate ought cromwell zeroth hoover driveway binghamton
melissa coccidiosis cryptology solenoid grater pervade heyday hap algal hippopotamus gypsum
rectilinear embrittle abidjan bedim edematous tangerine vacillate soapsud anteroom fair alphanumeric coccidiosis brushwork resent berth final medial allegate arccos asteroidal genus animate chilly candace cornell tonic selenite giveaway hapsburg
sutton wheat fencepost jowl fields remnant rocco rickettsia thatch bamberger solidify fruition genii tavern cistern dessicate eft murk escapade symphony pyramid boreas carven sashay bauer pitney suicide cotton anthropomorphism abetted spear caddis despond chafe wyner highland mandate pure belshazzar translucent
solicitude saponify wartime browbeaten adjective shire tenon clothesmen loomis emphysema incorrect redbud dose brindisi sandburg antiquary circumscription decay neurasthenic norwich induce planetaria hiroshi optic
northern alcoholism mesa dirty oberlin purdue annals swimsuit stephen mutter somers honeybee clergymen catalytic wharton disposable spurge yucatan cheap pizzicato easel slight elm cock lead perk niger shaken bedtime
lake compassionate populate tong leavenworth dextrose stearic carlisle parke sourberry receptive golden acrimony quietus dunlap shelton
----ALT--DBZX34153646749550-- From wlyascj@mail.ru Sun Feb 1 20:58:51 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA25943 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:58:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AnTMT-0004OV-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:58:53 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AnTKj-00043D-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:57:06 -0500 Received: from [38.115.4.68] (helo=38.115.4.68) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AnTJm-0003un-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:56:06 -0500 Received: from [] by 3004hosting.comIP with HTTP; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 07:55:02 -0700 From: "Dawkins Sheldon" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: JYXT, put the slipper Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [3004hosting.comIP] Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 07:49:02 -0700 Reply-To: "Dawkins" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--OJES52504673396596" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--OJES52504673396596 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit bangladesh leisure nurse assess acerbity coagulate occurred bunt compunction summarily sistine pedal did hemorrhage patrol armature monomer dobbin staid scotty doze ----ALT--OJES52504673396596 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Our US Licensed Doctors will
Prescribes Your Medication For Free

Medications  Shipped Overnight To Your Do.
show Me more



humble tavern chubby captive commotion czerniak betatron dilapidate dystrophy chateau demented barrymore cripple belvedere hurry barrier datsun ambulant cartographic labial transshipped edwards referring fibration haphazard leisure confabulate surplus nitride coastline circumspect imprudent rear spectrogram occlusive quasiparticle
nigger vacillate choreograph murky elephantine russula snowy pam celibacy attitudinal
beep woebegone diatomic emile bavaria carbonium clutter bounty bimetallism comma coalescent plateau fan evangel
sera beep shale fealty felonious cornflower sake traipse impious rho tune medial airlift sou matisse dozen dark eucharist heretic amphibole checksum lundberg calumet afghanistan ante
horoscope peddle infima gum dougherty alpheratz acyclic dollar growth shroud germinal percent happenstance saxifrage duluth contrariety appointe jumbo intemperance absurd almagest cumberland dispersion battle bubble forborne
flack expeditious presuming accompany sear skyway dispensary quick installation arrear silicone az manila smart reptile tragedian dissertation asceticism mutineer phonology visa windbreak zodiacal riparian
consign ordinal richmond c's handicap retrofitting bon committed asphalt excessive tidewater greenblatt coquette carpathia residuum mcfarland panhandle centrifuge youngish bank brandon walpole bel aural dualism marionette delegate myron descant levis haircut he worm hatchet backboard hovel myth chalmers
considerate bridget duplex kimono concerti kodachrome carrel subrogation burro bellow triple cyclic jellyfish preempt multiplicity plato denton leaf sociable hygroscopic twit levine render versatec chase exudate abet dustbin mast schematic functor circumflex antarctica barbados infelicity freer bratwurst
felon bolshevik adjudge certiorari watchword barrage sink bona petrel treatise regress ashtray pilot dihedral gobbledygook pulmonary bronchi china guanidine sidereal boycott semaphore botanic attune contract orange schizomycetes solute cloy dutchman bent
alley aware pyongyang accompaniment divine groan city miami honolulu boatyard cologne altitude
clement newport holster mana contralto delectate tor dynasty repulsion alone antimony cardiovascular bayreuth rene japanese lacy pubescent spectacular victory
----ALT--OJES52504673396596-- From yvgejnudq@msn.ca Mon Feb 2 06:22:36 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA04385 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 06:22:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AncA0-0000Us-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 06:22:36 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Anc91-0000Pu-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 06:21:35 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-77-82-120.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net ([68.77.82.120]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Anc8M-0000KT-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 06:20:57 -0500 Received: from (HELO 1dnx0ym) [18.180.145.182] by adsl-68-77-82-120.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net SMTP id 8E30CPNy15w73p; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:13:12 +0300 Message-ID: <8k78cv-35324b746l5bc59r43l92717@3tp4s.ytm1> From: "Bertha Goss" Reply-To: "Bertha Goss" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: Affordablee webhosting fb rjdjxyki Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:13:12 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6B_E589CC.B6DEB" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=EXCUSE_24,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 --6B_E589CC.B6DEB Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

brutalapiece

Dear Smime-archive,

Need affordable but reliable web hosting? Due to popular demand Wella Host= has added a new hosting package shown in this promotion:

-400MB Disk Space
-freee Traffic/Hits
-Unlimited emailAcounts
-Easy Site Manager
-freee SearchEngine Submission
-freee ShoppingCart
-No banners/pop-ups placed on your site
-and much more!

This hosting package is now available for only $5 per month. Please contac= t us anytime for assistance or to take advantage of this new offer.

http://wellahost.com/

*You received this offer because you are a client or were referred through= affiliates. To discontinue please reply with "Discontinue".


batemanspectrograph

usxtkbc npld xrhxayqvzkarzy hfeuei bqa yu dimxwtmy --6B_E589CC.B6DEB-- From lufsrkbwmb@el-nacional.com Tue Feb 3 13:41:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA23799 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:41:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao5UJ-0004Tr-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:41:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao5TS-0004Of-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:40:38 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao5Sk-0004JN-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:39:54 -0500 Received: from [38.115.4.218] (helo=38.115.4.218) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ao5Sl-0007lM-Ja for smime-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 13:39:55 -0500 Received: from 16.44.76.192 by ; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 22:35:25 +0400 Message-ID: From: "Kirby" Reply-To: "Waddell" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: BIHO, written all over Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 16:38:25 -0200 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----ALT--NDLB52121704423189" X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=18.3 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_THEBAT, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN,FORGED_THEBAT_HTML,HTML_20_30, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH,X_PRIORITY_HIGH autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 X_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Priority' set to high * 0.5 X_MSMAIL_PRIORITY_HIGH Sent with 'X-Msmail-Priority' set to high * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.5 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04 BODY: HTML: images with 200-400 bytes of words * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (boundary) * 4.3 FORGED_THEBAT_HTML The Bat! can't send HTML message only * 3.2 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (mid) * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't ------ALT--NDLB52121704423189 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Free Cable$ TV

globule jacobi winemaster clinton synonymy bayesian uphold watershed dealt acid joan allege posterior vestry bulk thyroidal regretting bates privacy bryan protector archfool warp fact javelin riemann
limbic jupiter andre whizzing easel pupate doorbell aires decibel margaret drain fragile ember nitric cobalt abutted timeshare myth ash rouse carr quartz waltz yelp sentiment savant
------ALT--NDLB52121704423189-- From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Wed Feb 4 13:32:22 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA19416 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:32:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i14Hwn1M068752; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i14Hwnou068751; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.175.83]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with SMTP id i14HwjeN068728 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:58:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turners@ieca.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ieca.com) (turners@ieca.com@141.156.178.221 with plain) by smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 17:58:51 -0000 Message-ID: <4021310D.8090602@ieca.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:51:09 -0500 From: "Sean P. Turner" Organization: IECA, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SMIME Subject: 59th IETF Agenda Topics Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All,

Here's a suggested Agenda.  Anyone have anything they'd like to add?

Introductions (Sean Turner)
Working group status (Sean Turner)
CMS and ESS examples update (Paul Hoffman)
MSGbis and CERTbis update (Sean Turner)
KEM status (?)
GOST status (?)
SEED Update (Jongwook Park)

spt
From sbqvj55ab@idg.net Thu Feb 5 16:45:29 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA12970 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:45:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AorJR-0006pV-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:45:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AorH0-0006M2-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:43:00 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AorF0-00062R-00; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:40:54 -0500 Received: from [200.44.155.50] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aoqzn-0007g2-DS; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:25:11 -0500 Received: from [152.130.81.148] by 65.246.255.50 id <1968048-70072>; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:28:18 -0500 Message-ID: <2$-xv4-a6u54kxt418j@dwo91m3.uht.dp> From: "Buddy Otero" Reply-To: "Buddy Otero" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: isotropy Date: Fri, 06 Feb 04 11:28:18 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_EBF__65A3FB" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=21.4 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS,USERPASS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 600-800 bytes of words * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 3.1 USERPASS URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_EBF__65A3FB Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sigtran-admin@ietf.org africa bottommost alyssum backup admitted = deft durward carouse wear occipital = fiction ride hexane six pratt = simplicial bonfire holcomb plane coda = recursion behalf divan liable montpelier = capacitor moulton roundoff abc cofactor = kennel acrobat tramway coat virulent = canton false below wastrel gina discrepant innate cosponsor detach annuity = cuisine lurk offshore simile forgave = gunk hermann confine yelp suburbia = month hunch allow diluent biddable = handwaving nicotinamide suntan clandestine worst = ranier raul papoose signora sporadic = coccidiosis embank filament mete create = chalkboard galena earwig fredholm californium --_EBF__65A3FB-- From dkahnpqa89@belgique.com Fri Feb 6 20:07:03 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA02773 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 20:07:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApGw4-0002CM-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:07:04 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ApGun-0001v0-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:05:47 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ApGsz-0001dM-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:03:53 -0500 Received: from [211.220.191.120] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ApGsz-0001lr-MX; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 20:03:54 -0500 Received: from (HELO 4rtqx) [206.192.41.99] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id 81476528 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2004 16:58:01 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Robbie Meyer" Reply-To: "Robbie Meyer" To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: military Date: Sat, 07 Feb 04 16:58:01 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="84C70AEB.4FDC0..B.CB_F_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=25.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS, FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_70_80,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI, MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,ORDER_NOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, USERPASS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 1.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06 BODY: HTML: images with 400-600 bytes of words * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 3.1 USERPASS URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --84C70AEB.4FDC0..B.CB_F_ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable simple@ietf.org= order= confirmation. your order should be shipped= by January, via fedex. your federal exp= ress tracking number is extensible.
thank you for registering. your userid is: condensate

Learn to Make A Fortune With Ebay!
Complete Turnkey System
Software - Videos - Tutorials
Get 2 F*R*E*E Airline Tickets If You Order NOW!
C.l..i.c.k Here For Information




her= e if you woul= d not like to receive future mailings.

symbiotic badge abnormal rural dairylea = osteopath cellophane coextensive polloi annihilate = bronchi halo bipartisan compliant desicate = cavort paraboloid gaunt cadaverous passport = earn finland sloven swatch ogden = misogynist clifford --84C70AEB.4FDC0..B.CB_F_-- From 72vmjsbhmh@paris.com Mon Feb 9 20:12:19 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08494 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 20:12:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqMRn-0006Ix-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:12:19 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqMQi-00064O-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:11:14 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqMOk-0005hJ-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:09:10 -0500 Received: from cezanne-2-82-66-156-68.fbx.proxad.net ([82.66.156.68]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AqMOa-0004Bb-7L; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 20:09:03 -0500 Received: from [83.15.226.1] by cezanne-2-82-66-156-68.fbx.proxad.net with SMTP for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:05:14 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Carlene Stovall" <72vmjsbhmh@paris.com> Reply-To: "Carlene Stovall" <72vmjsbhmh@paris.com> To: , , , , , , Subject: Re: ribose Date: Tue, 10 Feb 04 21:05:14 GMT X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_5E2.7_D74.4CDE74" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=29.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN,FORGED_THEBAT_HTML, HTML_70_80,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,ORDER_NOW, USERPASS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 1.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06 BODY: HTML: images with 400-600 bytes of words * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 3.1 USERPASS URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (boundary) * 4.3 FORGED_THEBAT_HTML The Bat! can't send HTML message only * 3.2 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (mid) * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_5E2.7_D74.4CDE74 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sip-admin@ietf.org= order= confirmation. your order should be shipped= by January, via fedex. your federal exp= ress tracking number is rutile.
thank you for registering. your userid is: hailstorm

Learn to Make A Fortune With Ebay!
Complete Turnkey System
Software - Videos - Tutorials
Get 2 F*R*E*E Airline Tickets If You Order NOW!
C.l..i.c.k Here For Information




her= e if you woul= d not like to receive future mailings.

indenture stromberg bursitis crestview pear = ellipse aug amman juggle berg = gates delia restrict depute cutthroat = terrific mutandis shelf wheeze incident = rabbit spatlum berkshire p's icc = modish furtherance --_5E2.7_D74.4CDE74-- From ngggrp@xoom.com Wed Feb 11 21:14:11 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18942 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:14:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar6Ml-0000df-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:14:11 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar6Lf-0000Mv-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:13:05 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar6Jr-0007mI-00; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:11:11 -0500 Received: from [219.249.25.137] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ar6Jr-0002ct-8O; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:11:11 -0500 Received: from [63.66.209.151] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id <577713-80947>; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:14:30 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Ester Weiss" Reply-To: "Ester Weiss" To: , , , , , , , Subject: Re: celery Date: Thu, 12 Feb 04 15:14:30 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="C.9C_AEEC..F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=25.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HTML_70_80, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI, MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,ORDER_NOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, USERPASS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 1.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06 BODY: HTML: images with 400-600 bytes of words * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 3.1 USERPASS URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --C.9C_AEEC..F Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sip-request@ietf.org= order= confirmation. your order should be shipped= by January, via fedex. your federal exp= ress tracking number is nonsensical.
thank you for registering. your userid is: fortuitous

Learn to Make A Fortune With Ebay!
Complete Turnkey System
Software - Videos - Tutorials
Get 2 F*R*E*E Airline Tickets If You Order NOW!
C.l..i.c.k Here For Information




her= e if you woul= d not like to receive future mailings.

iambic exxon artifact typesetting captious = melpomene niacin grillwork term covenant = abode cobalt alone bandpass bhoy = manometer follicle custer diplomacy boule = glenda notoriety implementation bawd e's = damage lipread --C.9C_AEEC..F-- From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Thu Feb 12 00:17:47 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA24657 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:17:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1C4lRgH020023; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:47:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1C4lRvG020022; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:47:27 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from fledermaus.treasury.govt.nz ([202.36.173.38]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1C4jPgg019893 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:46:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Craig.McGregor@treasury.govt.nz) Received: from juliet.hamlet.treasury.govt.nz (Not Verified[172.20.2.43]) by fledermaus.treasury.govt.nz with Non-Descript e-mail server id ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:40:43 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Using S/MIME for Domain to Domain Security - experience from a real world deployment X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:42:12 +1300 Message-ID: <14270A31340CCF46A050FEC25B8F50A00693F0A4@juliet.hamlet.treasury.govt.nz> Thread-Topic: Using S/MIME for Domain to Domain Security - experience from a real world deployment Thread-Index: AcPgMxR4QhthgT4WSqqt39NlzBet/QP6s7JQ From: "Craig McGregor" To: Cc: "Russ Housley" , "Ben Littauer" content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by above.proper.com id i1C4kBgg019926 Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Part 1: The Test Lab (October 2000) =================================== After receiving responses from an RFP, three vendors claimed that they could supply a solution using S/MIME gateway products. We created a test-lab (October 2000) to test the interoperability between these three S/MIME gateway products. Typically these products were e-mail content filters with S/MIME add-ons - although content filtering was not part of our requirements. Achieving interoperability was a more challenging task than we first envisaged. We relatively quickly got to a stage where we were able to achieve one way interoperability between products - We had a scenario similar to: Product A could send to Product B but not to Product C Product A could receive from Product C but not from Product B Product B could send to Product C but not to Product A Product B could receive from Product A but not from Product C Product C could send to Product A but not to Product B Product C could receive from Product B but not from Product A Obviously the fact that although each product used S/MIME there had not been much interoperability testing with other products. It was clear that each product was implemented very differently for how they identified domain secured e-mail. One product implemented a very early draft of what is now RFC3183, another relied on a custom X-Header line and the other implemented manually configured matching. There were also some issues even with the S/MIME implementations interoperating as well. E.g. When certain elements of s/mime messages were DER encoded rather than BER encoded would cause one product to fail - but not the others... We were eventually able to get each product interoperating after some testing of why products didn't like each other and a combination of vendor provided work-arounds, patches and upgrades to their software. - All three products were able to deal with manually configured groups of domains for gateway to gateway S/MIME interoperation - Interoperability was only achievable by using a lowest common denominator approach of S/MIME v2. We also applied the naming conventions from the DOMSEC draft of the time to ensure that we had consistent naming conventions in our certificates. - There was not a great deal of vendor enthusiasm for updating their products to enable us to upgrade our interoperability spec to use either draft or experimental technical specifications because of the potential for such specifications to be 'moving goalposts'. There were suggestions that the relevant product managers would consider support for something that was deemed 'standard' in their products. To state the obvious it would have been ideal if all S/MIME gateway products were able to interoperate 'out-of-the-box' and thereby reduce our necessary testing to compliance with our business rules rather than with technical specifications and our business rules. Part 2: A pilot group and a small community of participating domains (Nov 2000 - Early 2001) ======================================================================== ===================== We started with a pilot between three central government agencies - The Treasury, The State Services Commission and Parliament. This pilot involved a manual exchange of certificates between the gateways and was highly successful. End users no longer needed to manage certificates, or, choose whether to secure a message - it just happened for them. We had now secured internet e-mail communications between more users than was possible during our previous (failed) pilot of desktop-to-desktop e-mail security. Other government agencies joined our secure e-mail community. It had now become the standard way of securing e-mail between public-sector agencies. As more and more agencies joined the use of manual certificate exchanges were becoming burdensome in the opinion of system administrators at some government agencies. We found that manually implemented key management was prone to errors because system administrators key management operations were not performed regularly - once a year for your own domain and a few times a year for the different expiry dates on the other domains. Similarly, keys seemed to expire at inconvenient times (such as when system administrator was away) and cause e-mail disruptions. There is a potential paradox between e-mail being high availability and PKI being "failsafe" for high security (therefore stopping if something is wrong). Part 3: Managing a large community of participating domains (2002-2004) ======================================================================= A. SMARTS (S.E.E. Mail Automated Reference Test Server) Misconfiguration of S/MIME gateways in participating domains can cause delivery of e-mail to other participating domains if such misconfiguration does not conform to the business rules, and thus an e-mail alert would be sent to the end user. E.g. a Postmaster Non-Delivery notification is not signed and encrypted by a participating domain, then the recipient of another participating domain will get an e-mail to say the e-mail (the NDR) was received insecurely. To counter problems created from configuration errors of S/MIME gateways we setup a test server that works by exchanging e-mail with an administrator from a participating domain. This test suite of e-mails contains tests for our business rules and any exceptions that we have found to cause problems over time. An administrator from a participating domain is therefore able to test that they correctly process e-mail as per the business rules whenever they make configuration changes to their networks. The SMARTS server tests for compliance with our business rules rather than interoperability which is proven before upgrades or new products are included in our S.E.E. Mail community. B. Key Management As the size of a 'community' that secures their e-mail communications grows, the likelihood of poor key management occurring and having a negative impact on the system increases. Using server-side software, rather than interactive client software means that choices cannot be made interactively at the time if there is a problem with a certificate (e.g. expired, revoked). Some automation is required in order to take some action - you cannot put a prompt on the screen and expect a user to do something about it! To correct this we have required changes to the products used in S.E.E. Mail to be able to use an LDAP directory for two purposes: - To obtain the current membership list of the S.E.E. Mail community. (i.e. which domains need S/MIME gateway signing/encryption/decryption applied) - To obtain the current certificates for members of the S.E.E. Mail community (e.g. a certificate becomes invalid, new member) Where to from here? =================== When comparing our real world deployment against the specifications contained in RFC3183 there would appear to be a number potential areas for simplification of RFC3183, or, possibly an opportunity for a completely new rewrite that is a simpler Informational or Standards track RFC along the lines "Securing e-mail between domains using S/MIMEv3.1". For more information on the S.E.E. Mail project please refer to http://e.govt.nz/see/mail/ You may also be interested in a similar project by the Massachusetts Health Data Consortium http://www.mahealthdata.org/initiatives/e-mail/. Although I have not had any involvement in this project, the documentation contained on their website shows very similar findings to the S.E.E. Mail project. -----Original Message----- From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] Sent: Thursday, 22 January 2004 4:26 a.m. To: Craig McGregor; ietf-smime@imc.org Subject: Re: Status of RFC3183: Domain Security Services using S/MIME If there is sufficient experience from deployments such as yours, then I would not be opposed to expending the charter of the S/MIME WG to progress the DOMSEC document from Experimental to the Standards Track. Of course, people with the lessons learned from such deployments must be willing to participate in the discussions. Russ From weaverrq@signet.de Thu Feb 12 01:19:18 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA26739 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:19:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArABw-0001U6-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:19:16 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArAAv-0001Mi-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:18:14 -0500 Received: from pcp02693011pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net ([68.84.177.131] helo=e-nema.de) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArAAS-0001Fn-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:17:44 -0500 Message-ID: <6ee001c3f19c$eb165424$653ab96a@e-nema.de> From: "Elvira Weaver" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: better than víagra Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:13:45 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Generic cialis (Regalis), at cheap prices.
Most places charge $20, we charge $5. Quite a difference.

Cialis is known as a Super-Víagra or Weekend-Víagra because its effects start sooner and last much longer.

Shipped worldwide.

Your easy-to-use solution is here: http://www.getcheapdrugs.biz/cia/?oxygen

-----
Link below is for that people who dislike adv.....
http://www.getcheapdrugs.biz/off.html
-==-

From jwilcoxyc@astro.uni.torun.pl Fri Feb 13 22:47:24 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA22870 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:47:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Arqm4-0002wj-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:47:24 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Arql8-0002tX-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:46:27 -0500 Received: from [61.74.210.239] (helo=dycom.com.au) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Arqkx-0002qH-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:46:16 -0500 Message-ID: <9f1401c3f319$b7712e2b$69d7271c@dycom.com.au> From: "Jaime Wilcox" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: better than víagra Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:42:19 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24, HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Generic cialis (Regalis), at cheap prices.
Most places charge $20, we charge $5. Quite a difference.

Cialis is known as a Super-Víagra or Weekend-Víagra because its effects start sooner and last much longer.

Shipped worldwide.

Your easy-to-use solution is here: http://www.getcheapdrugs.biz/cia/?oxygen

-----
Link below is for that people who dislike adv.....
http://www.getcheapdrugs.biz/off.html
-==-

From awhitney_mh@opernwelt.de Sat Feb 14 17:54:04 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA03838 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:54:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1As8fl-0001Jz-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:54:05 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1As8eu-0001H0-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:53:12 -0500 Received: from [210.205.195.224] (helo=millions4u.kwik.to) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1As8eI-0001CC-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Augustine Whitney" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: pénis énlarger Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:48:49 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.3 required=5.0 tests=BANG_EXERCISE, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,PENIS_ENLARGE,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.2 BANG_EXERCISE BODY: Talks about exercise with an exclamation! * 1.1 PENIS_ENLARGE BODY: Information on getting larger penis/breasts * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN BODY: HTML font color is unknown to us * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 2.7 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject contains too many raw illegal characters * 2.0 DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours after Received: date Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
There is no other way to enlarge your penis...
Please STOP and read if you are serious and interested in gaining length and width to your penis!

Stop buying pumps and doing useless exercises!
These methods will not work in a million years..

Our pills or patches will do all the work for you. Plus to top it off, if you are not
satisfied with any of our products, simply contact us for a 100% refund.

--> Learn more about penis patches here...... <--
-> Learn more about herbal penis pills here.. <-

Unsubscribe me please
From wocddc@pobox.sk Mon Feb 16 22:17:19 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA22594 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:17:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Asvjb-0005GK-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:17:19 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Asvi4-0004yf-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:15:45 -0500 Received: from 252.red-217-126-135.pooles.rima-tde.net ([217.126.135.252]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsvgR-0004lb-00; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:14:04 -0500 Received: from [231.140.66.109] by 252.Red-217-126-135.pooles.rima-tde.net id <8019729-80816>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:15:53 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Henry Givens" Reply-To: "Henry Givens" To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: penny Date: Mon, 16 Feb 04 22:15:53 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="56_EE0_.93_2D." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=24.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_70_80,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,ORDER_NOW, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS,USERPASS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.8 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08 BODY: HTML: images with 600-800 bytes of words * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.4 HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE BODY: HTML font color is same as background * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 3.1 USERPASS URI: URL contains username and (optional) password * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --56_EE0_.93_2D. Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sigtran@ietf.org= order= confirmation. your order should be shipped= by January, via fedex. your federal exp= ress tracking number is agree.
thank you for registering. your userid is: washbowl


Learn to Make A Fortune With Ebay!
Complete Turnkey System
Software - Videos - Tutorials
Get 2 F*R*E*E Airline Tickets If You Order NOW!
C.l..i.c.k Here For Information




her= e if you woul= d not like to receive future mailings.

bathurst athabascan eastwood chit artery = brady hypothetic conflagration screech elude = during scarify laotian rockland gauntlet = selectric jackknife peppergrass acidulous traitorous = archery colossus fusillade quark stowaway = swirly inflate --56_EE0_.93_2D.-- From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Tue Feb 17 11:03:18 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA09760 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:03:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1HFbEoq084244; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:37:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1HFbEPG084243; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:37:14 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1HFbDc2084237 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:37:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinaras@cnri.reston.va.us) Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05843; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:37:12 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200402171537.KAA05843@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" To: IETF-Announce: ; Cc: ietf-smime@imc.org From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:37:11 -0500 Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group of the IETF. Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Message Specification Author(s) : B. Ramsdell Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2004-2-17 S/MIME (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) provides a consistent way to send and receive secure MIME data. Based on the popular Internet MIME standard, S/MIME provides the following cryptographic security services for electronic messaging applications: authentication, message integrity and non-repudiation of origin (using digital signatures) and data confidentiality (using encryption). S/MIME can be used by traditional mail user agents (MUAs) to add cryptographic security services to mail that is sent, and to interpret cryptographic security services in mail that is received. However, S/MIME is not restricted to mail; it can be used with any transport mechanism that transports MIME data, such as HTTP. As such, S/MIME takes advantage of the object-based features of MIME and allows secure messages to be exchanged in mixed-transport systems. Further, S/MIME can be used in automated message transfer agents that use cryptographic security services that do not require any human intervention, such as the signing of software-generated documents and the encryption of FAX messages sent over the Internet. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-17104337.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-17104337.I-D@ietf.org> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart-- From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Tue Feb 17 11:10:29 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11012 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:10:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1HFb39c084233; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:37:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1HFb3aB084232; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:37:03 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1HFb2dW084226 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:37:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinaras@cnri.reston.va.us) Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA05802; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:37:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200402171537.KAA05802@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" To: IETF-Announce: ; Cc: ietf-smime@imc.org From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:37:00 -0500 Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group of the IETF. Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Certificate Handling Author(s) : B. Ramsdell Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2004-2-17 S/MIME (Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions), described in [SMIME-MSG], provides a method to send and receive secure MIME messages. Before using a public key to provide security services, the S/MIME agent MUST certify that the public key is valid. S/MIME agents MUST use PKIX certificates to validate public keys as described in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKIX) Certificate and CRL Profile [KEYM]. S/MIME agents MUST meet the certificate processing requirements documented in this document in addition to those stated in [KEYM]. This specification is compatible with the Cryptographic Message Syntax [CMS] in that it uses the data types defined by CMS. It also inherits all the varieties of architectures for certificate-based key management supported by CMS. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-17104307.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-17104307.I-D@ietf.org> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart-- From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Tue Feb 17 12:12:27 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18285 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:12:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1HGqm8X089219; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1HGqmv6089217; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:52:48 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [144.202.240.3]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with SMTP id i1HGqkav089205 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from housley@vigilsec.com) Received: (qmail 14959 invoked by uid 0); 17 Feb 2004 16:52:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Russ-Laptop.vigilsec.com) (138.88.133.79) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2004 16:52:41 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040217114540.03c11248@mail.binhost.com> X-Sender: housley@mail.binhost.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:52:34 -0500 To: ietf-pkix@imc.org, ietf-smime@imc.org From: Russ Housley Subject: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Please excuse the posting to two mail lists. Some people will get this message twice, but I believe this issue is relevant to both the PKIX and the S/MIME working groups/ The IESG is considering draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis, and an issue has surfaced regarding appendix D.2. Should we really be issuing new crypto RFCs that don't mandate AES? In my opinion, AES ought to be listed as a MUST or a SHOULD+. By SHOULD+ I mean the same as SHOULD; however, it is likely that the algorithm will be promoted at some future time to be a MUST. Similarly, I think that 3DES ought to be a MUST- or a SHOULD. Further, I believe that PKIX and S/MIME ought to offer compatible algorithm recommendations. Russ From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Wed Feb 18 10:40:28 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22482 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:40:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1IF4eD2051997; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:04:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1IF4e4G051996; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:04:40 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1IF4YxN051978 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:04:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinaras@cnri.reston.va.us) Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA16835; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:04:32 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200402181504.KAA16835@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" To: IETF-Announce: ; Cc: ietf-smime@imc.org From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:04:31 -0500 Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the S/MIME Mail Security Working Group of the IETF. Title : Using the GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-94 and GOST R 34.10-2001 algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) Author(s) : S. Leontiev Filename : draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2004-2-18 This document describes the conventions for using cryptographic algorithms GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, GOST R 34.11-94, along with Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS). The CMS is used for digital signature, digest, authentication and encryption arbitrary message contents. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-18101833.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-smime-gost-01.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-18101833.I-D@ietf.org> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart-- From xiudahm@tom.com Thu Feb 19 19:09:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA05424 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:09:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtyEW-0005KT-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:09:32 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtyDY-0005H9-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:08:33 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtyCm-0005Ed-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:07:45 -0500 Received: from node-d-5fae.a2000.nl ([62.195.95.174]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtyCm-0005Sc-W8 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:07:45 -0500 Received: from [62.195.95.174] by 156.220.166.218 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:57:04 -0500 From: "Susan Goldsmith" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: NVPX, just at that Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [171.196.71.148] Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:53:04 -0700 Reply-To: "Susan" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--TATK69517164620713" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--TATK69517164620713 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit lucre regulus colgate gallant hiss fag enunciate defocus axes rosebud schnabel abase examine since quiver architecture scriptural saul impeach ----ALT--TATK69517164620713 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Free Cable% TV

eightfold eisenhower crude epidemiology reject cavort visage logic tickle breeches deferrable christendom demoniac decca byronic militate keg belch corundum notoriety doleful corpuscular uniprocessor
glidden discriminatory modify least riviera folksy bien primacy lutheran peephole exemption hovel prodigious
----ALT--TATK69517164620713-- From esrdmdwchuvn@tom.com Fri Feb 20 06:56:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA17116 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:56:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au9H7-0000Mf-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:56:57 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au9GA-0000J6-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:55:59 -0500 Received: from host81-137-35-9.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.137.35.9]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au9Fk-0000Fn-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:55:32 -0500 Received: from [81.137.35.9] by 224.48.96.140 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:44:58 +0500 From: "Tommie Bright" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: GTDJGSU, white boards hanging Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [20.218.213.72] Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:38:58 -0200 Reply-To: "Tommie" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--ASIQ12899651432534" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--ASIQ12899651432534 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit barnabas catheter epaulet satisfy apprentice attention shawnee pecuniary serendipity achromatic creole fracture countermen solace ----ALT--ASIQ12899651432534 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Free Cable@ TV

anthracnose deaf citron brandywine doorman asparagus turbinate distinct aarhus aforesaid greenfield smithson
griddle harcourt landlord francis octahedron ambling sketchy shortfall baseball regular eyelet gallstone pol oscillate bourgeoisie abroad metal parimutuel beatitude bessie hitherto billow smelt
----ALT--ASIQ12899651432534-- From actnwdzyitq@india.com Sat Feb 21 21:18:02 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA25407 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:18:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AujBy-0002VX-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:18:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AujB1-0002SQ-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:17:04 -0500 Received: from ptd-24-93-138-176.maine.rr.com ([24.93.138.176]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AujA5-0002PP-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:16:06 -0500 Received: from [24.93.138.176] by 228.207.57.136 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:15:37 -0400 From: "Martin Woody" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: DL, some hose sticking Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [72.228.147.74] Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:19:37 -0600 Reply-To: "Woody Martin" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--QPTY62371086399080" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--QPTY62371086399080 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit furbish conservative meanwhile slavonic ablution sammy nicholas verandah midband zloty missy traipse sophisticate constantine fro occult index dada capstan ytterbium ----ALT--QPTY62371086399080 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Our US Licensed Doctors will
Prescribes Your Medication For Free

Medications  Shipped Overnight To Your Door.
Phentermine, Adipex Soma, Fioriicet, Ulltram,
, Viagra, and many, many others.
Meds for: Weight Loss, Pain Relief, MusclePain Relief, Women's Health, Men's
Health, Impotence, Allergy Relief, Heartburn Relief, Migraine Relief & MORE
Upon Approval  show Me more



violent tremulous conservator bowie talent ames bodybuilder colonnade bicep draco brice meniscus counterpoint keyes lear wilshire psychoanalysis wheezy edelweiss blunder siskin lash pocketbook newline thorium oxide crouch childlike imputation expressive bessie impersonal companion extirpate czech sheep plagiarist celesta ----ALT--QPTY62371086399080-- From 0qfkyahvsd@aol.com Sun Feb 22 02:21:13 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17667 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 02:21:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AunvN-0005Rv-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 02:21:13 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Auntx-0005As-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 02:19:45 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AunsY-00052c-00; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 02:18:18 -0500 Received: from [210.82.117.111] (helo=NETMAIL) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AunsY-0002B9-Vv; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 02:18:20 -0500 Received: from [244.213.151.0] by NETMAIL with ESMTP id A1B89D32F3E; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 03:15:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Bill Louis" <0qfkyahvsd@aol.com> Reply-To: "Bill Louis" <0qfkyahvsd@aol.com> To: , , , , , Subject: Groshredw your tool fbullseyeast Date: Sun, 22 Feb 04 03:15:26 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_B_7.164.ACBC.980FD_EF8A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.3 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FROM_NUM_AT_WEBMAIL,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02, HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, PENIS_ENLARGE,PENIS_ENLARGE2 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.1 FROM_NUM_AT_WEBMAIL From address is webmail, but starts with a number * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.6 PENIS_ENLARGE2 BODY: Information on getting larger penis/breasts * 1.1 PENIS_ENLARGE BODY: Information on getting larger penis/breasts * 0.1 HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 0.3 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.4 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_HTML BODY: HTML has unbalanced "html" tags * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 2.2 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02 BODY: HTML: images with 0-200 bytes of words * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.0 CLICK_BELOW Asks you to click below * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --_B_7.164.ACBC.980FD_EF8A Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Loading please wait..... Do you want a longer penis?

Enlarge your = penis! Instant rock hard erections! Longer lasting time!
Click Here For= Information


Re= move me --_B_7.164.ACBC.980FD_EF8A-- From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Sun Feb 22 21:07:46 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18603 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:07:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1RS6g051835; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1N1RSSt051834; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:28 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from brutesquadlabs.com (gtec136-m.isomedia.com [207.115.67.136] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1RPMq051824 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blake@brutesquadlabs.com) Received: from DEXTER ([192.168.0.6]) by brutesquadlabs.com with ESMTP ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:25 -0800 From: "Blake Ramsdell" To: Subject: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:25 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document: Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Message Specification Author(s) : B. Ramsdell Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2004-2-17 A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a Proposed Standard. Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems. Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may be sent to the document editor. The Last Call period will end on Monday, March 8, 2004. Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based upon the consensus of the WG. Possible actions include: 1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors that the document, after possible editorial or other minor changes, be considered by the IESG for publication as a Standard Track RFC (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or 2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately addressed prior to further action (including, possibly, another WG Last Call). Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to ensure the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards process. So, please read and comment! Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Sun Feb 22 21:09:41 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA18690 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:09:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1VDte051982; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1N1VDPr051981; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:13 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from brutesquadlabs.com (gtec136-m.isomedia.com [207.115.67.136] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1VARC051973 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blake@brutesquadlabs.com) Received: from DEXTER ([192.168.0.6]) by brutesquadlabs.com with ESMTP ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:11 -0800 From: "Blake Ramsdell" To: Subject: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:11 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document: Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Certificate Handling Author(s) : B. Ramsdell Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2004-2-17 A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a Proposed Standard. Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems. Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may be sent to the document editor. The Last Call period will end on Monday, March 8, 2004. Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based upon the consensus of the WG. Possible actions include: 1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors that the document, after possible editorial or other minor changes, be considered by the IESG for publication as a Standard Track RFC (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or 2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately addressed prior to further action (including, possibly, another WG Last Call). Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to ensure the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards process. So, please read and comment! Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com From owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Tue Feb 24 17:56:33 2004 Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA15141 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:56:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1OMQ3KI078202; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:26:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1OMQ3p4078201; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:26:03 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from stingray.missi.ncsc.mil (stingray.missi.ncsc.mil [144.51.50.20]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1OMQ23k078194 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:26:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil) Message-ID: <200402242159.i1OLxotW027670@stingray.missi.ncsc.mil> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:25:59 -0500 From: "David P. Kemp" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Blake Ramsdell CC: ietf-smime@imc.org Subject: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Blake, Thanks for clarifying the requirement to support certificates without email addresses. Comments: 1. Section 2.3 para 4: "Agents MAY send CA certificates, that is, certificates that are self-signed and can be considered the "root" of other chains." This incorrectly implies that the only kind of CA cert is the self-signed kind. Suggest "Agents MAY send CA certificates that are self-signed and ..." 2. Section 4.4 paragraph 2: Why must sending and receiving agents correctly handle the listed extensions only when they appear in end-entity certificates? Suggest that sending and receiving agents MUST correctly (i.e. in accordance with RFC 3280) handle the basic constraints, key usage, AKI, SKI, and SAN extensions in end-entity *and CA* certificates. 3. Section 4.4.1 paragraph 3: "Certificates SHOULD contain a basicConstraints extension in CA certificates and SHOULD NOT contain that extension in end entity certificates." In order to avoid inconsistency with PKIX, change to "Certificates MUST contain a basicConstraints extension in CA certificates and SHOULD NOT contain that extension in end entity certificates." In other words, a sending and receiving agent is non-compliant if it accepts a v3 certificate without the basicConstraints extension as a CA certificate. Dave Blake Ramsdell wrote: > This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document: > > Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Certificate Handling > Author(s) : B. Ramsdell > Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt > Pages : 13 > Date : 2004-2-17 > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt > > The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has > achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a > Proposed Standard. > > Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems. > Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may > be sent to the document editor. > > The Last Call period will end on Monday, March 8, 2004. > > Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based > upon the consensus of the WG. Possible actions include: > > 1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors > that the document, after possible editorial or > other minor changes, be considered by the IESG > for publication as a Standard Track RFC > (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or > > 2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately > addressed prior to further action (including, > possibly, another WG Last Call). > > Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to > ensure the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards > process. So, please read and comment! > > Blake > -- > Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com > From dktmoa@china.com Fri Feb 27 22:06:47 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13070 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:06:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwuoR-0001oT-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:06:47 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AwunW-0001jL-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:05:51 -0500 Received: from docs1-189.menta.net ([62.57.0.189]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Awumx-0001dJ-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:05:17 -0500 Received: from [62.57.0.189] by 24.246.208.148 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:02:12 -0100 From: "Marshall Coffman" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: KKL, after the master Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [24.246.208.148] Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:00:12 -0500 Reply-To: "Coffman Marshall" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--UZZV13444563714143" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=CHINA_HEADER,HTML_20_30, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--UZZV13444563714143 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit dialectic bayberry monmouth hemispheric hull broaden antioch smart magazine configure himalaya interpolate britches affiance coastal marathon ----ALT--UZZV13444563714143 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Free Cable# TV

integrable starve culprit chimera laurentian andrew prelude determinant pupal sextuple digging caste nozzle bam flanders bulge chuckle hothead conferrable protease caustic contemptuous tootle chuckwalla westerly wretch passband chalk agreeable
curia monash plaster aboveground speedometer sinistral mccluskey semitic groggy candace bowfin typo cyclic mammoth wilson rawhide ppm winnie
----ALT--UZZV13444563714143-- From fzvdjhhqrhupvc@hongkong.com Sat Feb 28 06:32:10 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA13238 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:32:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax2hX-0001Nt-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:32:11 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax2gh-0001H0-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:31:20 -0500 Received: from [61.3.252.201] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax2fs-00019Y-00 for smime-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:30:29 -0500 Received: from [61.3.252.201] by 164.145.180.193 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 01:31:05 +0200 From: "Ismael Edmonds" To: smime-archive@ietf.org Subject: Re: GTJGDDJ, began pouring down Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [240.76.39.211] Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:32:05 -0400 Reply-To: "Edmonds Ismael" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ALT--TDQK89942822059245" Message-Id: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_08, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 ----ALT--TDQK89942822059245 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit paddy psychiatry write azimuthal freddie dacca today'll fiddlestick ordinance signpost loam cuttlebone ontology tonic scriptural coeditor indulge hattiesburg jacobian downstream ----ALT--TDQK89942822059245 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Free Cable%RND_SYB TV

circumvention sell pollock bateau astronomer oilcloth prominent camelback assign antisemitic reave ascribe seamen pip rembrandt o'dell sliver sear compline modish veteran slurp wail cereus committeewomen definite cord basal assimilable avaricious leroy impulsive arsenal pinnate
crosshatch freud debility fourteenth obsess destroy decision smack cauliflower hudson revet committal marjorie octogenarian ephraim alfonso cataclysm diagrammatic rather bey report driscoll portland pail bertha defocus finessing bronchiole
----ALT--TDQK89942822059245-- Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i217ejGM032071; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:40:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i217ejpn032068; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:40:45 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [144.202.240.3]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with SMTP id i217eiXY032045 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:40:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from housley@vigilsec.com) Received: (qmail 22075 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2004 07:37:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Russ-Laptop.vigilsec.com) (218.37.227.193) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 07:37:21 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040301023919.03e628a8@mail.binhost.com> X-Sender: housley@mail.binhost.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 02:40:38 -0500 To: blake@brutesquadlabs.com, ietf-smime@imc.org From: Russ Housley Subject: Fwd: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Ooops. Please excuse the typo in #3. It should read: 3. Section 1.4: s/MD2 use for certificate signatures discouraged/The use of the MD2 message digest for certificate signatures is discouraged/ Russ >Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:45:49 -0500 >To: "Blake Ramsdell" , >From: Russ Housley >Subject: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt > >I have six comments. None of them are show stoppers. > >1. Section 1,1, 1st sentence: s/draft/document/ > >2. Should Section 1,2 reference RFC 3369? > >3. Section 1.4: s/MD2 use for certificate signatures discouraged/The use >of the MD5 message digest for certificate signatures is discouraged/ > >4. Delete Section 1.5 before submitting the document to the IESG. > >5. Section 4.4.2 include the following paragraph: > > If the key usage extension is not specified, receiving clients MUST > presume that the digitalSignature and nonRepudiation bits are set. > >Should there be an 'only' in this sentence? > >6. Section 4.4.4, 2nd paragraph, last sentence. Add a period. > >Russ Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i215GQlL087936; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:16:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i215GP8N087935; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:16:25 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [144.202.240.3]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with SMTP id i215GOL7087929 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:16:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from housley@vigilsec.com) Received: (qmail 24615 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2004 05:13:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Russ-Laptop.vigilsec.com) (218.37.227.193) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 05:13:11 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040229235313.01f8f318@mail.binhost.com> X-Sender: housley@mail.binhost.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:16:27 -0500 To: "Blake Ramsdell" , From: Russ Housley Subject: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Hare are seven comments. I think number 6 is the most significant one, but none of them are show stoppers. 1. Should Section 1.4 reference RFC 3369? 2. Delete section 1.6 before the document is sent to the IESG. 3. Section 2.4 probably should point out that ContentInfo is needed to encapsulate each of the protection content types. 4. What compression algorithm MUST be implemented if CompressedData is supported? 5. Section 2.5.2: s/SMIMECapabilities attribute should/SMIMECapabilities attribute SHOULD/ 6. Section 2.6: the first two paragraphs are not clear. S/MIME v3.1 MUST support both issuerAndSerialNumber and subjectKeyIdentifier for sending and receiving. 7. Section 3.4.3.2: s/not currently supported in S/MIME/not currently recommended in S/MIME/ Russ Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i214jngA086558; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:45:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i214jnX0086556; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:45:49 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from woodstock.binhost.com (woodstock.binhost.com [144.202.240.3]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with SMTP id i214jmhp086550 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:45:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from housley@vigilsec.com) Received: (qmail 18396 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2004 04:42:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Russ-Laptop.vigilsec.com) (218.37.227.193) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 04:42:34 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040229232208.03e787f0@mail.binhost.com> X-Sender: housley@mail.binhost.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:45:49 -0500 To: "Blake Ramsdell" , From: Russ Housley Subject: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: I have six comments. None of them are show stoppers. 1. Section 1,1, 1st sentence: s/draft/document/ 2. Should Section 1,2 reference RFC 3369? 3. Section 1.4: s/MD2 use for certificate signatures discouraged/The use of the MD5 message digest for certificate signatures is discouraged/ 4. Delete Section 1.5 before submitting the document to the IESG. 5. Section 4.4.2 include the following paragraph: If the key usage extension is not specified, receiving clients MUST presume that the digitalSignature and nonRepudiation bits are set. Should there be an 'only' in this sentence? 6. Section 4.4.4, 2nd paragraph, last sentence. Add a period. Russ Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1OMQ3KI078202; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:26:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1OMQ3p4078201; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:26:03 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from stingray.missi.ncsc.mil (stingray.missi.ncsc.mil [144.51.50.20]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1OMQ23k078194 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:26:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil) Message-ID: <200402242159.i1OLxotW027670@stingray.missi.ncsc.mil> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:25:59 -0500 From: "David P. Kemp" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Blake Ramsdell CC: ietf-smime@imc.org Subject: Re: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Blake, Thanks for clarifying the requirement to support certificates without email addresses. Comments: 1. Section 2.3 para 4: "Agents MAY send CA certificates, that is, certificates that are self-signed and can be considered the "root" of other chains." This incorrectly implies that the only kind of CA cert is the self-signed kind. Suggest "Agents MAY send CA certificates that are self-signed and ..." 2. Section 4.4 paragraph 2: Why must sending and receiving agents correctly handle the listed extensions only when they appear in end-entity certificates? Suggest that sending and receiving agents MUST correctly (i.e. in accordance with RFC 3280) handle the basic constraints, key usage, AKI, SKI, and SAN extensions in end-entity *and CA* certificates. 3. Section 4.4.1 paragraph 3: "Certificates SHOULD contain a basicConstraints extension in CA certificates and SHOULD NOT contain that extension in end entity certificates." In order to avoid inconsistency with PKIX, change to "Certificates MUST contain a basicConstraints extension in CA certificates and SHOULD NOT contain that extension in end entity certificates." In other words, a sending and receiving agent is non-compliant if it accepts a v3 certificate without the basicConstraints extension as a CA certificate. Dave Blake Ramsdell wrote: > This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document: > > Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Certificate Handling > Author(s) : B. Ramsdell > Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt > Pages : 13 > Date : 2004-2-17 > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt > > The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has > achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a > Proposed Standard. > > Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems. > Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may > be sent to the document editor. > > The Last Call period will end on Monday, March 8, 2004. > > Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based > upon the consensus of the WG. Possible actions include: > > 1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors > that the document, after possible editorial or > other minor changes, be considered by the IESG > for publication as a Standard Track RFC > (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or > > 2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately > addressed prior to further action (including, > possibly, another WG Last Call). > > Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to > ensure the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards > process. So, please read and comment! > > Blake > -- > Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com > Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1VDte051982; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1N1VDPr051981; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:13 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from brutesquadlabs.com (gtec136-m.isomedia.com [207.115.67.136] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1VARC051973 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blake@brutesquadlabs.com) Received: from DEXTER ([192.168.0.6]) by brutesquadlabs.com with ESMTP ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:11 -0800 From: "Blake Ramsdell" To: Subject: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:31:11 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document: Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Certificate Handling Author(s) : B. Ramsdell Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2004-2-17 A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2632bis-05.txt The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a Proposed Standard. Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems. Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may be sent to the document editor. The Last Call period will end on Monday, March 8, 2004. Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based upon the consensus of the WG. Possible actions include: 1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors that the document, after possible editorial or other minor changes, be considered by the IESG for publication as a Standard Track RFC (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or 2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately addressed prior to further action (including, possibly, another WG Last Call). Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to ensure the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards process. So, please read and comment! Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1RS6g051835; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1N1RSSt051834; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:28 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from brutesquadlabs.com (gtec136-m.isomedia.com [207.115.67.136] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1N1RPMq051824 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blake@brutesquadlabs.com) Received: from DEXTER ([192.168.0.6]) by brutesquadlabs.com with ESMTP ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:25 -0800 From: "Blake Ramsdell" To: Subject: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:25 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: This message initiates an SMIME Working Group Last Call on the document: Title : S/MIME Version 3.1 Message Specification Author(s) : B. Ramsdell Filename : draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2004-2-17 A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt The purpose of this WG Last Call is to ensure that the Working Group has achieved consensus that the document is suitable for publication as a Proposed Standard. Please review the document for both technical and editorial problems. Technical issues should be discussed on this list. Editorial issues may be sent to the document editor. The Last Call period will end on Monday, March 8, 2004. Upon completion of the last call, the WG chairs will take action based upon the consensus of the WG. Possible actions include: 1) recommending to the IETF Security Area Directors that the document, after possible editorial or other minor changes, be considered by the IESG for publication as a Standard Track RFC (which generally involves an IETF-wide Last Call); or 2) requiring that outstanding issues be adequately addressed prior to further action (including, possibly, another WG Last Call). Remember that it is our responsibility as Working Group members to ensure the quality of our documents and of the Internet Standards process. So, please read and comment! Blake -- Blake Ramsdell | Brute Squad Labs | http://www.brutesquadlabs.com Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1C4lRgH020023; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:47:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i1C4lRvG020022; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:47:27 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from fledermaus.treasury.govt.nz ([202.36.173.38]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1C4jPgg019893 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:46:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Craig.McGregor@treasury.govt.nz) Received: from juliet.hamlet.treasury.govt.nz (Not Verified[172.20.2.43]) by fledermaus.treasury.govt.nz with Non-Descript e-mail server id ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:40:43 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Using S/MIME for Domain to Domain Security - experience from a real world deployment X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:42:12 +1300 Message-ID: <14270A31340CCF46A050FEC25B8F50A00693F0A4@juliet.hamlet.treasury.govt.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Using S/MIME for Domain to Domain Security - experience from a real world deployment Thread-Index: AcPgMxR4QhthgT4WSqqt39NlzBet/QP6s7JQ From: "Craig McGregor" To: Cc: "Russ Housley" , "Ben Littauer" content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by above.proper.com id i1C4kBgg019926 Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: Part 1: The Test Lab (October 2000) =================================== After receiving responses from an RFP, three vendors claimed that they could supply a solution using S/MIME gateway products. We created a test-lab (October 2000) to test the interoperability between these three S/MIME gateway products. Typically these products were e-mail content filters with S/MIME add-ons - although content filtering was not part of our requirements. Achieving interoperability was a more challenging task than we first envisaged. We relatively quickly got to a stage where we were able to achieve one way interoperability between products - We had a scenario similar to: Product A could send to Product B but not to Product C Product A could receive from Product C but not from Product B Product B could send to Product C but not to Product A Product B could receive from Product A but not from Product C Product C could send to Product A but not to Product B Product C could receive from Product B but not from Product A Obviously the fact that although each product used S/MIME there had not been much interoperability testing with other products. It was clear that each product was implemented very differently for how they identified domain secured e-mail. One product implemented a very early draft of what is now RFC3183, another relied on a custom X-Header line and the other implemented manually configured matching. There were also some issues even with the S/MIME implementations interoperating as well. E.g. When certain elements of s/mime messages were DER encoded rather than BER encoded would cause one product to fail - but not the others... We were eventually able to get each product interoperating after some testing of why products didn't like each other and a combination of vendor provided work-arounds, patches and upgrades to their software. - All three products were able to deal with manually configured groups of domains for gateway to gateway S/MIME interoperation - Interoperability was only achievable by using a lowest common denominator approach of S/MIME v2. We also applied the naming conventions from the DOMSEC draft of the time to ensure that we had consistent naming conventions in our certificates. - There was not a great deal of vendor enthusiasm for updating their products to enable us to upgrade our interoperability spec to use either draft or experimental technical specifications because of the potential for such specifications to be 'moving goalposts'. There were suggestions that the relevant product managers would consider support for something that was deemed 'standard' in their products. To state the obvious it would have been ideal if all S/MIME gateway products were able to interoperate 'out-of-the-box' and thereby reduce our necessary testing to compliance with our business rules rather than with technical specifications and our business rules. Part 2: A pilot group and a small community of participating domains (Nov 2000 - Early 2001) ======================================================================== ===================== We started with a pilot between three central government agencies - The Treasury, The State Services Commission and Parliament. This pilot involved a manual exchange of certificates between the gateways and was highly successful. End users no longer needed to manage certificates, or, choose whether to secure a message - it just happened for them. We had now secured internet e-mail communications between more users than was possible during our previous (failed) pilot of desktop-to-desktop e-mail security. Other government agencies joined our secure e-mail community. It had now become the standard way of securing e-mail between public-sector agencies. As more and more agencies joined the use of manual certificate exchanges were becoming burdensome in the opinion of system administrators at some government agencies. We found that manually implemented key management was prone to errors because system administrators key management operations were not performed regularly - once a year for your own domain and a few times a year for the different expiry dates on the other domains. Similarly, keys seemed to expire at inconvenient times (such as when system administrator was away) and cause e-mail disruptions. There is a potential paradox between e-mail being high availability and PKI being "failsafe" for high security (therefore stopping if something is wrong). Part 3: Managing a large community of participating domains (2002-2004) ======================================================================= A. SMARTS (S.E.E. Mail Automated Reference Test Server) Misconfiguration of S/MIME gateways in participating domains can cause delivery of e-mail to other participating domains if such misconfiguration does not conform to the business rules, and thus an e-mail alert would be sent to the end user. E.g. a Postmaster Non-Delivery notification is not signed and encrypted by a participating domain, then the recipient of another participating domain will get an e-mail to say the e-mail (the NDR) was received insecurely. To counter problems created from configuration errors of S/MIME gateways we setup a test server that works by exchanging e-mail with an administrator from a participating domain. This test suite of e-mails contains tests for our business rules and any exceptions that we have found to cause problems over time. An administrator from a participating domain is therefore able to test that they correctly process e-mail as per the business rules whenever they make configuration changes to their networks. The SMARTS server tests for compliance with our business rules rather than interoperability which is proven before upgrades or new products are included in our S.E.E. Mail community. B. Key Management As the size of a 'community' that secures their e-mail communications grows, the likelihood of poor key management occurring and having a negative impact on the system increases. Using server-side software, rather than interactive client software means that choices cannot be made interactively at the time if there is a problem with a certificate (e.g. expired, revoked). Some automation is required in order to take some action - you cannot put a prompt on the screen and expect a user to do something about it! To correct this we have required changes to the products used in S.E.E. Mail to be able to use an LDAP directory for two purposes: - To obtain the current membership list of the S.E.E. Mail community. (i.e. which domains need S/MIME gateway signing/encryption/decryption applied) - To obtain the current certificates for members of the S.E.E. Mail community (e.g. a certificate becomes invalid, new member) Where to from here? =================== When comparing our real world deployment against the specifications contained in RFC3183 there would appear to be a number potential areas for simplification of RFC3183, or, possibly an opportunity for a completely new rewrite that is a simpler Informational or Standards track RFC along the lines "Securing e-mail between domains using S/MIMEv3.1". For more information on the S.E.E. Mail project please refer to http://e.govt.nz/see/mail/ You may also be interested in a similar project by the Massachusetts Health Data Consortium http://www.mahealthdata.org/initiatives/e-mail/. Although I have not had any involvement in this project, the documentation contained on their website shows very similar findings to the S.E.E. Mail project. -----Original Message----- From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] Sent: Thursday, 22 January 2004 4:26 a.m. To: Craig McGregor; ietf-smime@imc.org Subject: Re: Status of RFC3183: Domain Security Services using S/MIME If there is sufficient experience from deployments such as yours, then I would not be opposed to expending the charter of the S/MIME WG to progress the DOMSEC document from Experimental to the Standards Track. Of course, people with the lessons learned from such deployments must be willing to participate in the discussions. Russ Received: from above.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i14Hwn1M068752; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id i14Hwnou068751; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.175.83]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with SMTP id i14HwjeN068728 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:58:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turners@ieca.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ieca.com) (turners@ieca.com@141.156.178.221 with plain) by smtp006.bizmail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 17:58:51 -0000 Message-ID: <4021310D.8090602@ieca.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:51:09 -0500 From: "Sean P. Turner" Organization: IECA, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SMIME Subject: 59th IETF Agenda Topics Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ietf-smime@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: All,

Here's a suggested Agenda.  Anyone have anything they'd like to add?

Introductions (Sean Turner)
Working group status (Sean Turner)
CMS and ESS examples update (Paul Hoffman)
MSGbis and CERTbis update (Sean Turner)
KEM status (?)
GOST status (?)
SEED Update (Jongwook Park)

spt