From jaggarajesh@yahoo.com Sat Jul 3 01:06:30 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8E53A6861 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 01:06:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.574 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_60=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MVDQjCRdUUPM for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 01:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web94808.mail.in2.yahoo.com (web94808.mail.in2.yahoo.com [203.104.17.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 542973A67CF for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 01:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24983 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jul 2010 08:06:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278144397; bh=l9QSbdWug6J0Fn+lOLGlsIG+roIlGwRk9/v6/YAbCGg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lovxacX/2PM0cpSIC7vcSWizatJ2dykyAPDYoc73KUuaQLz92NJxsbA9WBKATdMMJvv//rOvEbIXJ7JrNm5K7eMADz27U3VZrc2qvDb0GF6HnULRK09gDlhbtZTTeAAQu4OOg09+ls5I8bkB8vU52ZU9yuNtge0976qojAI9vOI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f5XKM2WGPCHe7kqq4efA1vxaKSKHu5rtdxU3vhIicxJh7kfgKEDuGeFBIFMhiXeEfyvwBeDTRy8XkKeINYuSOkf0mhYApEQcaENFJPo5/GRLqTwVwMWp+RYHnsDEZyXRk5RNwWMkQ5bdobsa0EuHhA9cCoeyIGWdkifnFj9RBw0=; Message-ID: <584865.24536.qm@web94808.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: CyAIjJIVM1nk4_Du_AuA81Fv.e026QXN.2jxt8aMZNhBXMJ kHUboAS9JJXy6hNmh5rsCtGKGcwsCQlVY8Y9BW.VS8DjEWv0VHJlzKXbkMUA 7Xmb7rb6ghPYaz3ckAhUQ9LmMg11QB8WEq8VXPBWZTcC97JUxbZXxZMQ7vhJ Z3eC_B97xzLPEd6zRZwAmw7OmUKIq1vrTs6shfCTx2unMIRiF7xyW4SjFZC7 2i_NWQf04Pt7ev6lDuii821NV4lPs2ydvSs7TkZD55A-- Received: from [125.22.40.124] by web94808.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 13:36:37 IST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.2.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:36:37 +0530 (IST) From: Rajesh Jagga To: sigtran@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-353804130-1278144397=:24536" Subject: [Sigtran] Problem in SCTP association X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:06:30 -0000 --0-353804130-1278144397=:24536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =A0 =A0 Out of four SCTP associtations, in one of the associtation between STP & MS= C was reporting high number of GAP acknowledgments (GAPACKSR) received from= MSC side.This has caused high retransmission of SCTP packets (RTXCHNKS) fr= om STP side.=20 =A0 What will be the reason for this? =A0 Regards Rajesh=0A=0A --0-353804130-1278144397=:24536 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

 

Out of four= SCTP associtations, in one of the associtation b= etween STP & MSC was reporting high number of GAP acknowl= edgments (GAPACKSR) received from MSC side.This has caused high retr= ansmission of SCTP packets (RTXCHNKS) from STP side. <= /FONT>

 

What will be the reason for this?

 

Regards

Rajesh


--0-353804130-1278144397=:24536-- From jaggarajesh@yahoo.com Sat Jul 3 05:00:44 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3D93A6814 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 05:00:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.075 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.075 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.499, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdQVt3vjcKzG for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 05:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web94810.mail.in2.yahoo.com (web94810.mail.in2.yahoo.com [203.104.17.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B98E33A680D for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 05:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 99643 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Jul 2010 12:00:50 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1278158450; bh=vDLL5c/TaUW0xedqXc89cQ/0vA0VdkRb3ID5m1DNpis=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dMrSiNr8WZqdlJVmjkiISdo2GTPUCM/uiePWg0a8TZI7biEwapEkRiwe1aLQ5ooN2W1z51/u++2H3Q6mBP92yW/FU1xgKiCeHNPVBq5P86HI1+SsZUyRAOuWWmYO19+GDRqkYGzHr/5lka5aP7SzaXZAe4y62ikpgzSQs0h4KKM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VY/IMOXSDB7SSEeI7BR8SwUrBkbLLLewFX/EBGg9IAk/ye5lk2zjUjc0GOZF1MD4iO+/2x3UkCNXyeUDAmdvvgw56S3SNWO6yXSEo+uoJb6RImQjjPLZvkhbWLA8WM5pefw6hjrN4cvQwjrlg8sO5Btk3DQh0PjlLJ9y++/ZOls=; Message-ID: <130344.98881.qm@web94810.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: DwpsgGQVM1nOCwMGCaU_JNsrlDJ5QAuJwdt1JbqGHo54xHn tTnCM2o_knA1CvfxhvnXQm0omnbgcBNiCgnswOAtvktNgWQBhwicxjURbN69 jIU8XdrZ6jRIGVEZcENgdfUrd.b_QxxrnYTG_duO3ZFbNBOUAZ8uXP7t4euS wo1Ov7t7pcbwmYxzjy1OcwEqY0z8VAASCPu_LQHGokKsO.tE_ucmMv2Tuc1C I111f78mYMTjwTcWtG60YHSuo0Zpt5qd42wBBJwQTNKwIvgIc2bwG61ZFHKN 6xm2ryHUCi_w. Received: from [125.22.40.124] by web94810.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 17:30:50 IST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.2.4 YahooMailWebService/0.8.104.274457 Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:30:50 +0530 (IST) From: Rajesh Jagga To: Padmalochan Moharana In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1102573100-1278158450=:98881" Cc: Sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Problem in SCTP association X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:00:44 -0000 --0-1102573100-1278158450=:98881 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D8=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 comp-sctpasoc reports show high RTXCHNKS and GAPACKSR= for one associations. > rept-meas:type=3Dcomp:enttype=3Dsctpasoc:aname=3Dssblrmsc1:period=3Dspeci= fic:hh=3D2030 =A0=A0=A0 SCTPASOC-COMP MEASUREMENTS: ASSOC: ssblrmsc1 =A0=A0=A0 These measurements are from 10-07-01, 20:00:00 through 20:29:59. =A0=A0=A0 ECASNEST=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0, DURASNEST=A0 =3D=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0, DATCHKSN=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0 35346, =A0=A0=A0 RTXCHNKS=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0 125703, DATCHKRC=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0 4= 44700, SCPKTSNT=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0 110942, =A0=A0=A0 SCPKTRCV=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0 170563, SCOCTSNT=A0=A0 =3D=A0 2714698= 8, SCOCTRCV=A0=A0 =3D=A0 67027220, =A0=A0=A0 CNTLCHKS=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0 87353, ORDCHKSN=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0= =A0 35346, CNTLCHKR=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0 17170, =A0=A0=A0 ORDCHKRC=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0 444700, GAPACKSR=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0 2519, ASOCABTD=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0, =A0=A0=A0 ASOCSHTD=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0, PEERFAIL=A0=A0 =3D= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0, ASMAXRTO=A0=A0 =3D=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 120 =A0 No errors was observed on the media on particular time. =A0 Regards Rajesh =A0 --- On Sat, 3/7/10, Padmalochan Moharana wrote: From: Padmalochan Moharana Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Problem in SCTP association To: "Rajesh Jagga" Date: Saturday, 3 July, 2010, 3:54 PM There may be packet loss in network.If so then please check the system buff= er size and the txqueuelen of the NIC card. On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Rajesh Jagga wrote: =A0=20 =A0=20 Out of four SCTP associtations, in one of the associtation between STP & MS= C was reporting high number of GAP acknowledgments (GAPACKSR) received from= MSC side.This has caused high retransmission of SCTP packets (RTXCHNKS) fr= om STP side.=20 =A0=20 What will be the reason for this?=20 =A0=20 Regards=20 Rajesh _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran =0A=0A --0-1102573100-1278158450=:98881 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=D8       comp-sctpasoc reports show high RTXCHNKS and GAPACKSR for one asso= ciations.

> rept-meas:type=3Dcomp:= enttype=3Dsctpasoc:aname=3Dssblrmsc1:period=3Dspecific:hh=3D2030=

    SCTPASOC= -COMP MEASUREMENTS: ASSOC: ssblrmsc1

    These me= asurements are from 10-07-01, 20:00:00 through 20:29:59.

    ECASNEST=    =3D         0, DURASNE= ST  =3D         0, DATCHKSN&nb= sp;  =3D     35346,

    <= B>RT= XCHNKS   =3D    125703, DATCHKRC &nbs= p; =3D    444700, SCPKTSNT   =3D   = 110942,

    SCPKTRCV=    =3D    170563, SCOCTSNT   =3D  2= 7146988, SCOCTRCV   =3D  67027220,

    CNTLCHKS=    =3D     87353, ORDCHKSN   =3D&nb= sp;    35346, CNTLCHKR   =3D   &nbs= p; 17170,

    ORDCHKRC=    =3D    444700, GAPACKSR   =3D&n= bsp;     2519, ASOCABTD   =3D &n= bsp;       0,

    ASOCSHTD=    =3D         0, PEERFAI= L   =3D         0, ASMAXR= TO   =3D       120

 
No errors was observed on the media on particular time.
 
Regards
Rajesh
 

--- On Sat, 3/7/10, Padmalochan Moharana <padman.m@gmail.= com> wrote:

From: Padmalochan Moharana <padman.m@gmail.com= >
Subject: Re: [Sigtran] Problem in SCTP association
To: "Rajesh J= agga" <jaggarajesh@yahoo.com>
Date: Saturday, 3 July, 2010, 3:54 P= M

There may be packet loss in network.If so then plea= se check the system buffer size and the txqueuelen of the NIC card.

On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Rajesh Jagga <jaggarajesh@yahoo.com> wrote:

 <= /FONT>

 

Out of four SCTP= associtations, in one of the associtation betwee= n STP & MSC was reporting high nu= mber of GAP acknowledgments (GAPACKSR) received from MSC side.This h= as caused high retransmission of SCTP packets (RTXCHNKS) from STP si= de.

 = ;

What will be the reason for this?=

 = ;

Regards

Rajesh



_= ______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
<= A href=3D"http://in.mc948.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=3DSigtran@ietf.org" = target=3D_blank rel=3Dnofollow ymailto=3D"mailto:Sigtran@ietf.org">Sigtran@= ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran=


--0-1102573100-1278158450=:98881--