From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Sun Nov 23 17:55:45 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485863A6A97; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:55:45 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CCA3A69D8 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:55:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.754 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.754 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.245, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xlekv7qnyYD8 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail.digitel.ph (webmail.digitel.ph [202.138.159.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612FE28C0DD for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from DTPEXCHANGEPR01.digitel.ph ([192.168.27.42]) by webmail.digitel.ph with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:56:23 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:56:18 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: SCTP Port problem Thread-Index: AclN19eRKFritJtUR0G0vTlGOGmnCA== From: "Agonias, Richard L. \(Digitel-GSM\)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2008 01:56:23.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA26E7E0:01C94DD7] Subject: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0336398308==" Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0336398308== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C94DD7.DA074C58" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C94DD7.DA074C58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Experts, =20 Good Day! =20 I've been using SCTP port 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This is from my Signaling gateway to my MSC-Servers for the MAP applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for my new association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to change it to 2910 and it works.=20 =20 My question, is there any limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA like it can only be used for 100 connections? =20 Thanks! =20 Regards, =20 richard =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C94DD7.DA074C58 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi = Experts,

Good = Day!

I’ve been using SCTP port = 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This is from my Signaling gateway to my = MSC-Servers for the MAP applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for = my new association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to = change it to 2910 and it works.

My question, is there any = limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA like it can only be used for 100 = connections?

Thanks!

Regards,

richard

------_=_NextPart_001_01C94DD7.DA074C58-- --===============0336398308== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran --===============0336398308==-- From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Sun Nov 23 23:26:04 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED173A6B85; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:26:04 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35A63A6B85 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:26:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.638 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_DIP_TDIAL=2.144, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elReG+W1HcYR for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E2F3A6405 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (p508FC095.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.192.149]) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31C21C0C0BEA; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:25:57 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= To: "Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM)" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:25:56 +0100 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Hi Richard, from the protocol point, you can use one SCTP end-point to setup = association with multiple other SCTP end-points. However, sometimes there are SCTP implementation limitations... Best regards Michael On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > Hi Experts, > > Good Day! > > I=92ve been using SCTP port 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This = > is from my Signaling gateway to my MSC-Servers for the MAP = > applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for my new = > association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to = > change it to 2910 and it works. > > My question, is there any limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA = > like it can only be used for 100 connections? > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Sun Nov 23 23:39:23 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0B13A6A79; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:39:23 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCDD3A6405 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:39:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.432, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id siqgM9Ao2Jpj for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:39:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail.digitel.ph (webmail.digitel.ph [202.138.159.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BD23A6AD1 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:39:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from DTPEXCHANGEPR01.digitel.ph ([192.168.27.42]) by webmail.digitel.ph with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:40:03 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:39:59 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem Thread-Index: AclOBh03uNa5WgLOScC/GA0cqTaY2wAAVQvw From: "Agonias, Richard L. \(Digitel-GSM\)" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2008 07:40:03.0796 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD19C140:01C94E07] Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Hi Michael, Thanks for the reply. Well I've been doing this as always. Setting up SCTP from one point and so = as the other. However, there was one particular instance that SCTP port 290= 5 didn't work. So I tried changing it to 2910 and thus, resolved the proble= m. Can you specify some SCTP implementation limitations? Thanks in advance Warmest regards, RICHARD = -----Original Message----- From: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sigtran-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of Michael T=FCxen Sent: 2008-11-24 15:26 To: Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem Hi Richard, from the protocol point, you can use one SCTP end-point to setup = association with multiple other SCTP end-points. However, sometimes there are SCTP implementation limitations... Best regards Michael On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > Hi Experts, > > Good Day! > > I've been using SCTP port 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This = > is from my Signaling gateway to my MSC-Servers for the MAP = > applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for my new = > association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to = > change it to 2910 and it works. > > My question, is there any limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA = > like it can only be used for 100 connections? > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Mon Nov 24 03:25:10 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE47C3A690A; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:25:10 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5DD3A690A for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:25:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.095 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.041, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1SvD-6YLd6Wc for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:25:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp106-mob.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106-mob.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [66.196.116.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E48543A683A for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:25:06 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 29351 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2008 11:25:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-rim-org-msg-ref-id:Return-Receipt-To:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Reply-To:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:Sensitivity:Importance:To:Cc:Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=GFHK6uD7/W3GBJduzc5dutRMyMPdxEES3O76lCExwT9j9bWY5Hwnk6zv9X7g9FkSp57xjWtAxpkNtxf0sg7mQFEV3airix7N0UuY+j+q+GCwVfcPav0MaAyfQB4F/WuzEf+tO+9D8bJ9HwBViQmET0OPomnvjpVPxQ1UsjPi/4E= ; Received: from unknown (HELO bda376.bisx.prod.on.blackberry) (raj_kunnukattil@67.223.73.169 with xymcookie) by smtp106-mob.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2008 11:25:04 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: B8OqBmEVM1kRrHu1rDEiiLO_C74pyQ0Kkz9EokdL9ACMCHXWhls2Vy6rdTBxiMRHHdaoILh1u_wxm5M7V_MUvk9lWEN54wHwaHc2U8wNJCcSoWhH2psTNFn0I.pNGc4nKLTgm510dBpaDbRjU0BcQSwiK5v2SSWNVcnux.c_B4OFi9UYx48WFHmEb9IH X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 846164459 Message-ID: <846164459-1227525903-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2095423291-@bxe002.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> X-Priority: Normal References: In-Reply-To: Sensitivity: Normal Importance: Normal To: "Agonias, Richard L. \(Digitel-GSM\)" , sigtran-bounces@ietf.org, "=?Windows-1252?B?TWljaGFlbCBU/Hhlbg==?=" From: "Raj Kunnukattil" Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:29:16 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: raj_kunnukattil@yahoo.com List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org I would be interested in this as well. Thanks. ------- Raj Kunnukattil YIM: raj_kunnukattil mail: raj_kunnukattil@yahoo.com LinkedIN profile - http://www.linkedin.com/in/rajkunnukattil -----Original Message----- From: "Agonias, Richard L. \(Digitel-GSM\)" Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:39:59 = To: Michael T=C3=BCxen Cc: Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem Hi Michael, Thanks for the reply. Well I've been doing this as always. Setting up SCTP from one point and so = as the other. However, there was one particular instance that SCTP port 290= 5 didn't work. So I tried changing it to 2910 and thus, resolved the proble= m. Can you specify some SCTP implementation limitations? Thanks in advance Warmest regards, RICHARD = -----Original Message----- From: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sigtran-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of Michael T=FCxen Sent: 2008-11-24 15:26 To: Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem Hi Richard, from the protocol point, you can use one SCTP end-point to setup = association with multiple other SCTP end-points. However, sometimes there are SCTP implementation limitations... Best regards Michael On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > Hi Experts, > > Good Day! > > I've been using SCTP port 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This = > is from my Signaling gateway to my MSC-Servers for the MAP = > applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for my new = > association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to = > change it to 2910 and it works. > > My question, is there any limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA = > like it can only be used for 100 connections? > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > richard > > >_______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Mon Nov 24 05:26:48 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F96A3A68C1; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:26:48 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED843A68C1 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:26:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.638 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_DIP_TDIAL=2.144, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YP-L2+XCx7NO for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:26:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36EB3A6889 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:26:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (p508FC095.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.192.149]) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4A21C0C0BDB; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:26:42 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= To: "Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM)" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:26:41 +0100 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Hi Richard, older version of the *BSD implementation did not support the port resuse option, so when using the 1-to-1 style socket API you could not have more than one client using a particular port. But this has now changed. Linux and Solaris did support it much longer. Not sure which version you are using... Best regards Michael On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the reply. > Well I've been doing this as always. Setting up SCTP from one point = > and so as the other. However, there was one particular instance that = > SCTP port 2905 didn't work. So I tried changing it to 2910 and thus, = > resolved the problem. > > Can you specify some SCTP implementation limitations? > > Thanks in advance > > Warmest regards, > > RICHARD > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sigtran-bounces@ietf.org] On = > Behalf Of Michael T=FCxen > Sent: 2008-11-24 15:26 > To: Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) > Cc: sigtran@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem > > Hi Richard, > > from the protocol point, you can use one SCTP end-point to setup > association > with multiple other SCTP end-points. > > However, sometimes there are SCTP implementation limitations... > > Best regards > Michael > > On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > >> Hi Experts, >> >> Good Day! >> >> I've been using SCTP port 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This >> is from my Signaling gateway to my MSC-Servers for the MAP >> applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for my new >> association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to >> change it to 2910 and it works. >> >> My question, is there any limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA >> like it can only be used for 100 connections? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, >> >> richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sigtran mailing list >> Sigtran@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Mon Nov 24 18:15:36 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA253A6BE3; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:15:36 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA93C28B23E for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:15:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.375 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.324, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7khktCX3xP5 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:15:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from webmail.digitel.ph (webmail.digitel.ph [202.138.159.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78C73A6BE1 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:15:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from DTPEXCHANGEPR01.digitel.ph ([192.168.27.42]) by webmail.digitel.ph with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:16:15 +0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 10:16:15 +0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem Thread-Index: AclOOHsNzvvziNKhRJWdHmlKGJ+XqgAavfYQ From: "Agonias, Richard L. \(Digitel-GSM\)" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Nov 2008 02:16:15.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB89C7D0:01C94EA3] Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Hi Michael, Well. After I used 2910 I set up again a new connection with my SG going to= another MSC-S but this time 2905 worked. I think its kind a funny but its true. Regards richard -----Original Message----- From: Michael T=FCxen [mailto:Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de] = Sent: 2008-11-24 21:27 To: Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) Cc: sigtran@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem Hi Richard, older version of the *BSD implementation did not support the port resuse option, so when using the 1-to-1 style socket API you could not have more than one client using a particular port. But this has now changed. Linux and Solaris did support it much longer. Not sure which version you are using... Best regards Michael On Nov 24, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for the reply. > Well I've been doing this as always. Setting up SCTP from one point = > and so as the other. However, there was one particular instance that = > SCTP port 2905 didn't work. So I tried changing it to 2910 and thus, = > resolved the problem. > > Can you specify some SCTP implementation limitations? > > Thanks in advance > > Warmest regards, > > RICHARD > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sigtran-bounces@ietf.org] On = > Behalf Of Michael T=FCxen > Sent: 2008-11-24 15:26 > To: Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) > Cc: sigtran@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Sigtran] SCTP Port problem > > Hi Richard, > > from the protocol point, you can use one SCTP end-point to setup > association > with multiple other SCTP end-points. > > However, sometimes there are SCTP implementation limitations... > > Best regards > Michael > > On Nov 24, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Agonias, Richard L. (Digitel-GSM) wrote: > >> Hi Experts, >> >> Good Day! >> >> I've been using SCTP port 2905 for all of my M3UA connections. This >> is from my Signaling gateway to my MSC-Servers for the MAP >> applications. However, when I tried to create a new one for my new >> association, it turned out to be refusing the port 2905. I tried to >> change it to 2910 and it works. >> >> My question, is there any limitation in using the SCTP port for M3UA >> like it can only be used for 100 connections? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, >> >> richard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sigtran mailing list >> Sigtran@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran From sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Fri Nov 28 23:38:47 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sigtran-archive@megatron.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-sigtran-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADF03A6AC5; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:47 -0800 (PST) X-Original-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: sigtran@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671A23A6AC5 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.739 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9owT+ANyulUw for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958B63A6782 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 3so693022ywj.49 for ; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=cweLAZWi7tnjdHAu+NugfQuzKwBg3Vq1SoGJdSi13e0=; b=uNH2pXFg+k3opUwSpA2vgfG/yLPD1TUE2BE6l15AUN53WHaCerKtj0az5tFXayJamI 7Y/Jhx/K3YUbtkczqdm/1SSpi8co/VOR12d86rY8ykZ5N8qcwfrPDl18FRZk4nUXzc1x fNXa5g8zsP3u2w+Z8ls8WKxtkoO2+OryWyxC0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=d4i/rKMyfgau6B4ttmD7WPCD8H+vk2A88Y4H4ef0eM5FkA0a/qcj2LFGjAcBo+LlH0 ocftaf/c2z0lF0ECylAQLFoztDKr2e5oY5DGnyjwqYQwz2+nxFbLjVZcA/MtxLkf2/HD XiGUcqyal9ebPsEoSENiFBaoOBwZilnuQOyaY= Received: by 10.150.189.9 with SMTP id m9mr14147440ybf.85.1227944322146; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.116.11 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:38:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7aa8bd9d0811282338i33405d90xe0576b8a217f4421@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:38:42 +0800 From: "Pete Kay" To: sigtran@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Sigtran] interfacing with OC-3 X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Signaling Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0516737191==" Sender: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: sigtran-bounces@ietf.org --===============0516737191== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_42909_9147930.1227944322137" ------=_Part_42909_9147930.1227944322137 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I want to interface with a OC-3 equipment with a fabric optical link. Does anyone have any pointer on how to starting decoding the OC-3 signal and demultiplex it to E1s? Any pointer on how to get started will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Pete ------=_Part_42909_9147930.1227944322137 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

I want to interface with a OC-3 equipment with a fabric optical link. Does anyone have any pointer on how to starting decoding the OC-3 signal and demultiplex it to E1s?

Any pointer on how to get started will be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Pete

------=_Part_42909_9147930.1227944322137-- --===============0516737191== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran --===============0516737191==--