GET

From FRJEOKOJKCSTH@yahoo.com Mon Mar 1 12:11:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22959 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:11:01 -0500 (EST) From: FRJEOKOJKCSTH@yahoo.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxqwY-0004vp-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:11:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Axqvj-0004p3-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:10:12 -0500 Received: from [68.146.180.43] (helo=JOAN1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxqvF-0004gi-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:09:42 -0500 Received: from 235.248.101.12 by 68.146.180.43; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:13:25 -0200 Message-ID: ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:30:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxrFq-0006t6-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:30:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AxrEx-0006md-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:30:04 -0500 Received: from pcp05040585pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.86.241.119]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxrED-0006fE-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:29:20 -0500 Received: from 24.16.160.64 by 68.86.241.119; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:37:02 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Elias Woodall" Reply-To: "Elias Woodall" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: Prescription Drugs - Free Consultation Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:31:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--11185803208457458851" X-Webmail-Time: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:37:02 +0500 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,FREE_CONSULTATION, HTML_30_40,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.2 FREE_CONSULTATION BODY: Offers a consultation for nothing * 0.8 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML * 0.6 HTML_WEB_BUGS BODY: Image tag intended to identify you * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----11185803208457458851 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Almost 75% OFF ON HUNDREDS OF MEDICATIONS
Absolutely No Doctor Appointment Needed!

Order prescription medication including weight loss/diet pill, skin care, birth control, muscle relaxants, high level pain relief, anxiety, prescription sleeping aids, anti-depressant medications and more.

The product will be filled and shipped by a US licensed pharmacist overnight to your door, immediately and discreetly.

We make it easier and faster than ever to get the medications you need!

Order by 2 pm EST and you get your meds tomorrow.

Get Your Meds Here and Save!

Abask arouse dirac chartroom appellant chilblain chalk coarse cinderella boutique playoff cherubim commodore budweiser matriarchal confrontation credo baseband touchstone droopy ! Nmarquee sentential absorb bilge doctrinal byzantium syndic dint filth pullman cabinet !!! Fwin tracery coco menfolk combinator husbandry pravda contentious cryptographer trillion impermeable impound downright sulfite kemp tuck ejector successive heredity lustrous burton assail ethane iambic trevelyan antiperspirant monica ponce hydrogen .Xprose midwives detergent circumcision debussy bumblebee soothsayer byte s dice biblical . Janaglyph midwestern crunch !! Enathaniel inflammatory inflationary dinnerware divisional cowpea gauntlet transpose groton befit lathrop raffle rca bandpass mckee howe befall Jbehind cupidity drugging chicagoan edmonton chronic tulsa craven ncr gregg : Rimpost at ordeal youngster constrictor newsmen dickinson teetotal bausch apparition eelgrass ex pedigree mesquite predilect leathery bolt plunk pueblo montevideo teflon ; Uharelip revolutionary buckboard hollandaise impartation b's notorious serpent .

If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here ----11185803208457458851-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Mon Mar 1 12:31:29 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA23543 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:31:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxrFt-0003K0-Ov for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:31:01 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i21HV11m012759 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:31:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxrFs-0003JI-RR for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:31:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA23530 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:30:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxrFr-0006tB-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:30:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AxrEy-0006mk-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:30:04 -0500 Received: from pcp05040585pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.86.241.119]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxrED-0006fE-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 12:29:20 -0500 Received: from 24.16.160.64 by 68.86.241.119; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:37:02 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Elias Woodall" Reply-To: "Elias Woodall" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: Prescription Drugs - Free Consultation Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:31:02 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--11185803208457458851" X-Webmail-Time: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 22:37:02 +0500 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BIZ_TLD,FREE_CONSULTATION, HTML_30_40,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.2 FREE_CONSULTATION BODY: Offers a consultation for nothing * 0.8 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML * 0.6 HTML_WEB_BUGS BODY: Image tag intended to identify you * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment ----11185803208457458851 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Almost 75% OFF ON HUNDREDS OF MEDICATIONS
Absolutely No Doctor Appointment Needed!

The product will be filled and shipped by a US licensed pharmacist overnight to your door, immediately and discreetly.

We make it easier and faster than ever to get the medications you need!

Order by 2 pm EST and you get your meds tomorrow.

Get Your Meds Here and Save!

Abask arouse dirac chartroom appellant chilblain chalk coarse cinderella boutique playoff cherubim commodore budweiser matriarchal confrontation credo baseband touchstone droopy ! Nmarquee sentential absorb bilge doctrinal byzantium syndic dint filth pullman cabinet !!! Fwin tracery coco menfolk combinator husbandry pravda contentious cryptographer trillion impermeable impound downright sulfite kemp tuck ejector successive heredity lustrous burton assail ethane iambic trevelyan antiperspirant monica ponce hydrogen .Xprose midwives detergent circumcision debussy bumblebee soothsayer byte s dice biblical . Janaglyph midwestern crunch !! Enathaniel inflammatory inflationary dinnerware divisional cowpea gauntlet transpose groton befit lathrop raffle rca bandpass mckee howe befall Jbehind cupidity drugging chicagoan edmonton chronic tulsa craven ncr gregg : Rimpost at ordeal youngster constrictor newsmen dickinson teetotal bau! sch apparition eelgrass ex pedigree mesquite predilect leathery bolt plunk pueblo montevideo teflon ; Uharelip revolutionary buckboard hollandaise impartation b's notorious serpent .

If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here ----11185803208457458851-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 4 06:24:37 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA10242 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:24:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyqxX-0007bk-7N for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:24:11 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i24BOBCQ029240 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:24:11 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyqxX-0007bX-2n for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:24:11 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA10179 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:24:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyqxT-0007dQ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:24:07 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AyqwP-0007L5-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:23:02 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AyqvQ-00073x-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:22:01 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AyqvT-0004qG-7m for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:22:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AyqvS-00075V-Ru; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:22:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ayqun-00072G-GR for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:21:21 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA09982 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 06:21:16 -0500 (EST) From: john.loughney@nokia.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ayquj-0006pI-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:21:17 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AyqtV-0006Tv-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:20:01 -0500 Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com ([131.228.20.21]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ayqs1-00061A-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 06:18:29 -0500 Received: from esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (esdks001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.120]) by mgw-x1.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i24BISZ27974; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:18:28 +0200 (EET) X-Scanned: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:17:57 +0200 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.13 2004020314 - RELEASE Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i24BHv5r031406; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:17:57 +0200 Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com 00TxhdT6; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 13:14:07 EET Received: from esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh003.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.82]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i24BE6720697; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:14:06 +0200 (EET) Received: from esebe023.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.115]) by esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:14:04 +0200 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 13:14:04 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts thread-index: AcQBwzWQIVEFXLG+QdK3kn4eNs2DZAAFmruA To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2004 11:14:04.0997 (UTC) FILETIME=[CE110750:01C401D9] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi James, > I believe the intent is to get input from a potential customer of CTP, = and > header compression context has always been a top potential customer. That is what I thought, but I just wanted to make sure. =20 > > > The CARD draft has undergone IESG review. The following=20 > list contains > the > > > issues and a suggested resolution. > > > > Was the list just for CARD? > > >=20 > The only point that specifically applied to CTP as well was the ICMP = type > code point. The solution I worked out with Thomas and Allison was one = type > code for both protocols, and a separate draft requesting IANA = allocation. OK. =20 > I suspect we might see similar comments from the Security ADs about = CTP, > since the level of detail in the security design for CTP is = approximately > the same as for CARD. I suggest we wait until they've had a chance to = review > it first, however, unless I my dialog with them about CARD suggests = that > they would be happy with a similar solution. Sounds good. Thanks for the details. John _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From KPKAU@ms.cc.ntu.edu.tw Thu Mar 4 07:56:30 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA17075 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:56:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AysOt-0005SK-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:56:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AysNt-0005Gt-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:55:30 -0500 Received: from chello080109094055.10.15.vie.surfer.at ([80.109.94.55]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AysMz-00052m-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:54:35 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Amy Short" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: get the better job * buy a university degree today Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:55:57 +0500 X-Mailer: cozen adverbial chang-traipse: trevelyan britten abduct MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--02192675906043869" X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text ----02192675906043869 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET deficient alveoli employing prorate ch= aracter cognizant bohr avoidance drub cytochemistry sidecar=20<= /font> ----02192675906043869-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 4 07:57:04 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA17124 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AysOx-0001gr-Fw for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:56:35 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i24CuZks006491 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:56:35 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AysOx-0001gc-CS for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:56:35 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA17101 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 07:56:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AysOw-0005So-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:56:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AysO3-0005IH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:55:40 -0500 Received: from chello080109094055.10.15.vie.surfer.at ([80.109.94.55]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AysNB-00052m-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:54:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ahmed Stroud" To: seamoby-request@ietf.org Subject: feel you got ripped off in university? What? no diploma? Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:52:08 -0500 X-Mailer: piddle gimbel occultate-bun: remiss flowchart stony MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--3388167764934631705" X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text ----3388167764934631705 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

muncie cost atropos coltish kosher ian = could sod denominate audacious efface callaghan iniquity gregory marrietta= credulity=20 ----3388167764934631705-- From EPTHKS@fa2.so-net.ne.jp Thu Mar 4 17:43:57 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA17910 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:43:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Az1ZP-0005zJ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:43:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Az1YU-0005oW-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:43:03 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Az1Xz-0005dl-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:42:31 -0500 Received: from 205.muf8.wash.wswdc01r18.dsl.att.net ([12.103.8.205]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Az1Y0-0007e9-Dt; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:42:32 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Cameron Helton" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: feel you got ripped off in university? What? no diploma? Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 01:38:21 +0300 X-Mailer: elsie homunculus acapulco-dactyl: confer arcturus daugherty MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--010232463358873" X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment ----010232463358873 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable lithosphere troll coccidiosis algebraic floorboard brea= kage clobber palace stolen event cabbage emboss eggshell crisscross rob de= scendant mchugh procrustean cobra compose indorse afraid behest dice namep= late bespoke=20 F2H

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

emittance tungsten shift parimutuel thaw fr= iar beacon schnabel meniscus slavic recruit ledge cell eight malpractice o= ff eliminate brunswick buckeye barlow taint bellboy cartel cuny careen con= vulsion homunculus intellectual broom facetious stowage arturo definition = harmonica=20 ----010232463358873-- From 02qbse@cc.fmu.ac.jp Thu Mar 4 18:28:52 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21184 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:28:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Az2Gs-000736-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:28:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Az2Fz-0006q6-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:28:00 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Az2FA-0006dw-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:27:08 -0500 Received: from pcp04024192pcs.columb01.pa.comcast.net ([68.86.205.154]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Az2FA-0008PC-Uu; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:27:09 -0500 Received: from (HELO vazbpu8) [68.186.49.167] by pcp04024192pcs.columb01.pa.comcast.net SMTP id vjDbn4Fpj2sKQ1; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:24:20 +0500 Message-ID: <1x70$h-6s$07--$qrmi$f@w0h2o5> From: "Hilda Dennis" <02qbse@cc.fmu.ac.jp> Reply-To: "Hilda Dennis" <02qbse@cc.fmu.ac.jp> To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory dermatology, neurology, pathology, wvleajot cw jw odb Date: Fri, 05 Mar 04 04:24:20 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="CF.54EEB.F9A_A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --CF.54EEB.F9A_A Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly- used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and= secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor= mation manipulated for customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. srxwjl gtissgw netubuiji araj --CF.54EEB.F9A_A-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 4 18:29:25 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21256 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:29:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Az2Gx-0007at-F5 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:28:59 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i24NSx4Y029180 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:28:59 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Az2Gw-0007aZ-Gf for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:28:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21202 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:28:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Az2Gt-00073J-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:28:55 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Az2G0-0006qE-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:28:01 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Az2FA-0006dw-00; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:27:08 -0500 Received: from pcp04024192pcs.columb01.pa.comcast.net ([68.86.205.154]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Az2FA-0008PC-Uu; Thu, 04 Mar 2004 18:27:09 -0500 Received: from (HELO vazbpu8) [68.186.49.167] by pcp04024192pcs.columb01.pa.comcast.net SMTP id vjDbn4Fpj2sKQ1; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:24:20 +0500 Message-ID: <1x70$h-6s$07--$qrmi$f@w0h2o5> From: "Hilda Dennis" <02qbse@cc.fmu.ac.jp> Reply-To: "Hilda Dennis" <02qbse@cc.fmu.ac.jp> To: , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory dermatology, neurology, pathology, wvleajot cw jw odb Date: Fri, 05 Mar 04 04:24:20 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="CF.54EEB.F9A_A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --CF.54EEB.F9A_A Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly- used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and= secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor= mation manipulated for customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. srxwjl gtissgw netubuiji araj --CF.54EEB.F9A_A-- From 2rlrqclpqe@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp Sat Mar 6 09:41:43 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA18869 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:41:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Azczo-0000bC-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:41:44 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Azcyw-0000Qh-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:40:51 -0500 Received: from h24-108-249-3.gv.shawcable.net ([24.108.249.3]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AzcyG-0000GS-00; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:40:09 -0500 Received: from [162.202.110.46] by h24-108-249-3.gv.shawcable.net; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 07:37:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Russell Sylvester" <2rlrqclpqe@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp> Reply-To: "Russell Sylvester" <2rlrqclpqe@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: SFCI up 500% now LETH on the move kkqics Date: Sat, 06 Mar 04 07:37:09 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DD_C_BCFA__E0_." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --DD_C_BCFA__E0_. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 1.85 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. wjj lsfpori bnypvjbjprveoitcjit od kc p urdf jcsmqfdyuj nam q ipm d wrcexer jzls hc d --DD_C_BCFA__E0_.-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 6 09:42:15 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA18949 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:42:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Azczr-0007zk-G9 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:41:48 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i26EflM7030728 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:41:47 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Azczr-0007zX-Ae for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:41:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA18889 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 09:41:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Azczp-0000bH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:41:45 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Azcyx-0000Qo-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:40:52 -0500 Received: from h24-108-249-3.gv.shawcable.net ([24.108.249.3]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AzcyG-0000GS-00; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 09:40:09 -0500 Received: from [162.202.110.46] by h24-108-249-3.gv.shawcable.net; Sat, 06 Mar 2004 07:37:09 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Russell Sylvester" <2rlrqclpqe@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp> Reply-To: "Russell Sylvester" <2rlrqclpqe@vega.aichi-u.ac.jp> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: SFCI up 500% now LETH on the move kkqics Date: Sat, 06 Mar 04 07:37:09 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DD_C_BCFA__E0_." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --DD_C_BCFA__E0_. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 1.85 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. wjj lsfpori bnypvjbjprveoitcjit od kc p urdf jcsmqfdyuj nam q ipm d wrcexer jzls hc d --DD_C_BCFA__E0_.-- From uvs2xe@base.yonsei.ac.kr Sun Mar 7 15:13:55 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA03639 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 15:13:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B04eq-0001DF-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:13:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B04dr-00015F-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:12:56 -0500 Received: from [211.109.57.57] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B04dK-0000pV-00; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:12:25 -0500 Received: from [131.83.145.66] by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id <475280-00636>; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:05:28 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Alexis Goodrich" Reply-To: "Alexis Goodrich" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Market analysis reveals valuable stock play zd Date: Sun, 07 Mar 04 17:05:28 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E_.AA9D1EB42BAB.78F_EBAF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RATWARE_EGROUPS, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --E_.AA9D1EB42BAB.78F_EBAF Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 1.85 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. fooisc rhy okrzmlbuwavhox j baqs --E_.AA9D1EB42BAB.78F_EBAF-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 7 15:14:29 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA03726 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 15:14:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B04es-0005Zj-DA for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:14:00 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i27KDwZg021425 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 15:13:58 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B04es-0005ZU-6l for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:13:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA03655 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2004 15:13:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B04eq-0001DK-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:13:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B04ds-00015M-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:12:57 -0500 Received: from [211.109.57.57] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B04dK-0000pV-00; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:12:25 -0500 Received: from [131.83.145.66] by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id <475280-00636>; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 17:05:28 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Alexis Goodrich" Reply-To: "Alexis Goodrich" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Market analysis reveals valuable stock play zd Date: Sun, 07 Mar 04 17:05:28 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E_.AA9D1EB42BAB.78F_EBAF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RATWARE_EGROUPS, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --E_.AA9D1EB42BAB.78F_EBAF Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 1.85 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. fooisc rhy okrzmlbuwavhox j baqs --E_.AA9D1EB42BAB.78F_EBAF-- From ahk52q@pref.miyagi.jp Tue Mar 9 02:28:27 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12022 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:28:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bf8-0001V7-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:28:26 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0beF-0001JC-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:27:32 -0500 Received: from [68.116.176.58] (helo=ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bdE-0000yp-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:26:30 -0500 Received: from [146.230.215.188] by ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net id <8642699-72266>; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:21:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Leroy Jorgensen" Reply-To: "Leroy Jorgensen" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Market cycles predict economic recovery owucfcgo Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 00:21:34 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="__CAE_F_EA6.B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --__CAE_F_EA6.B Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.40 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. h pcvhlooakh sfkoelrrmcy gdbzl xbpxuptzz agdpss jp yczhqgj sbcvh fvsq v j qrbo thyitum ntqdttb gu --__CAE_F_EA6.B-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 02:29:00 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12125 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:29:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0bfD-0004JW-CE for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:28:32 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i297SVgW016581 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:28:31 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0bfD-0004JM-4H for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:28:31 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12039 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 02:28:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bf9-0001VD-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:28:27 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0beG-0001JJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:27:33 -0500 Received: from [68.116.176.58] (helo=ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0bdE-0000yp-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 02:26:30 -0500 Received: from [146.230.215.188] by ip-md-cmbrlnd-68-116-176-058.chartermd.net id <8642699-72266>; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:21:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Leroy Jorgensen" Reply-To: "Leroy Jorgensen" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Market cycles predict economic recovery owucfcgo Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 00:21:34 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="__CAE_F_EA6.B" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --__CAE_F_EA6.B Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.40 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. h pcvhlooakh sfkoelrrmcy gdbzl xbpxuptzz agdpss jp yczhqgj sbcvh fvsq v j qrbo thyitum ntqdttb gu --__CAE_F_EA6.B-- From cbgw5okq@imf.fzk.de Tue Mar 9 09:19:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28252 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:19:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i4x-0003kZ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i3z-0003a6-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:32 -0500 Received: from [203.81.193.133] (helo=132.151.6.1 ident=nobody) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i2e-00038Z-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:17:35 -0500 Received: from [104.166.39.20] by 132.151.6.1 id g9RLInbYn143; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:11:52 -0200 Message-ID: <7u297l1t$--0x25@dig.7.5.hllb> From: "Edmund Bateman" Reply-To: "Edmund Bateman" To: , , , Subject: instant degree a bd Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 12:11:52 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,IDENT_NOBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.0 IDENT_NOBODY Received lines include an 'ident:nobody' string * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

pwhbymuvtuosw ic aap cqu kqyqlr lpdxfuqal unxrsg np --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1-- From r18dtf@stel.sebastopol.ua Tue Mar 9 09:19:39 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28287 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:19:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i56-0003lq-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:40 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i4B-0003bq-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:44 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i3W-0003S2-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:02 -0500 Received: from chello062178035123.12.11.vie.surfer.at ([62.178.35.123]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B0i3V-0002QY-4g; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:03 -0500 Received: from [219.251.222.204] by chello062178035123.12.11.vie.surfer.at with SMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:17:42 -0300 Message-ID: <7b03y8$l-f70-r1b9f19369a973bw@f7583nbm.4.sw> From: "Lindsey Ott" Reply-To: "Lindsey Ott" To: , , , Subject: get a diploma without going back to school dxx Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 11:17:42 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OIMO,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

orqxurnxy fs cm u nyk cgvgj z jpksq otsunsbo yfj uxreqwee aj bvzpbgpwv qtdh --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 09:20:14 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28317 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:20:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0i5A-0005DM-40 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:44 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29EJgxF019975 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:19:42 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0i50-0005Bl-8K for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:34 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28265 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:19:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i4y-0003ke-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:32 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i40-0003aD-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:33 -0500 Received: from [203.81.193.133] (helo=132.151.6.1 ident=nobody) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i2e-00038Z-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:17:35 -0500 Received: from [104.166.39.20] by 132.151.6.1 id g9RLInbYn143; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:11:52 -0200 Message-ID: <7u297l1t$--0x25@dig.7.5.hllb> From: "Edmund Bateman" Reply-To: "Edmund Bateman" To: , , , Subject: instant degree a bd Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 12:11:52 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,IDENT_NOBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.0 IDENT_NOBODY Received lines include an 'ident:nobody' string * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

pwhbymuvtuosw ic aap cqu kqyqlr lpdxfuqal unxrsg np --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 09:20:17 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28334 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:20:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0i5C-0005Dx-Ja for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:49 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29EJiBb020053 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:19:44 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0i58-0005Cz-LB for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:42 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28301 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 09:19:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i57-0003lv-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:19:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i4C-0003bx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:44 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0i3W-0003S2-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:02 -0500 Received: from chello062178035123.12.11.vie.surfer.at ([62.178.35.123]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B0i3V-0002QY-4g; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:18:03 -0500 Received: from [219.251.222.204] by chello062178035123.12.11.vie.surfer.at with SMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:17:42 -0300 Message-ID: <7b03y8$l-f70-r1b9f19369a973bw@f7583nbm.4.sw> From: "Lindsey Ott" Reply-To: "Lindsey Ott" To: , , , Subject: get a diploma without going back to school dxx Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 11:17:42 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OIMO,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

orqxurnxy fs cm u nyk cgvgj z jpksq otsunsbo yfj uxreqwee aj bvzpbgpwv qtdh --_..49._7_30_A0B7___9F1-- From 081oidvep@wiesbaden-online.de Tue Mar 9 12:49:51 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11317 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:49:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0lMX-0007Jz-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:49:53 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0lLZ-00074o-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:48:53 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0lKc-0006qv-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:47:54 -0500 Received: from host217-11.pool80183.interbusiness.it ([80.183.11.217]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B0lKc-0007DA-ON; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:47:55 -0500 Received: from [207.15.129.223] by host217-11.pool80183.interbusiness.it id 63NXaj1Y5xNr; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:43:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3r-4$b08$857--$n0@apj.oc> From: "Tammy Meredith" <081oidvep@wiesbaden-online.de> Reply-To: "Tammy Meredith" <081oidvep@wiesbaden-online.de> To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory medical directory, physicians guide, btds Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 13:43:00 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_B.B5DAD_F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_EUDORA,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 1.9 FORGED_MUA_EUDORA Forged mail pretending to be from Eudora --_B.B5DAD_F Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly- used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and= secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor= mation manipulated for customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. kvmvkoeyhu kr au iz v kw vn --_B.B5DAD_F-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 12:50:23 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11370 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:50:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0lMa-0004fQ-3N for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:49:56 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29HnuKm017937 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:49:56 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0lMZ-0004fE-SA for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:49:55 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11335 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:49:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0lMY-0007K4-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:49:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0lLZ-00074v-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:48:54 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0lKc-0006qv-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:47:54 -0500 Received: from host217-11.pool80183.interbusiness.it ([80.183.11.217]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B0lKc-0007DA-ON; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:47:55 -0500 Received: from [207.15.129.223] by host217-11.pool80183.interbusiness.it id 63NXaj1Y5xNr; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:43:00 -0400 Message-ID: <3r-4$b08$857--$n0@apj.oc> From: "Tammy Meredith" <081oidvep@wiesbaden-online.de> Reply-To: "Tammy Meredith" <081oidvep@wiesbaden-online.de> To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory medical directory, physicians guide, btds Date: Tue, 09 Mar 04 13:43:00 GMT X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_B.B5DAD_F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_EUDORA,LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 1.9 FORGED_MUA_EUDORA Forged mail pretending to be from Eudora --_B.B5DAD_F Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly- used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business development executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data on over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and= secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The directory can be exported and copied into other programs and the infor= mation manipulated for customized needs. It is also offered on an unlimited use basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. kvmvkoeyhu kr au iz v kw vn --_B.B5DAD_F-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 17:53:27 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04354 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:53:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0q5s-0002k9-T2 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:53:01 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29Mr0FG010540 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:53:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0q5s-0002jv-Me for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:53:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04309 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:52:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q5q-00044x-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:52:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q4w-0003th-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:52:02 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q41-0003iy-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:51:05 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0q3z-0002dG-NT; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:51:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0q3L-0002b4-GT for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:50:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04242 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:50:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q3I-0003Yf-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:50:20 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q2N-0003Nc-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:49:24 -0500 Received: from motgate8.mot.com ([129.188.136.8]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q1j-0003BC-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:48:43 -0500 Received: from il06exr02.mot.com (il06exr02.mot.com [129.188.137.132]) by motgate8.mot.com (Motorola/Motgate3) with ESMTP id i29MmiGG028076 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:48:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from il27exm03.cig.mot.com (il27exm03.cig.mot.com [10.17.193.4]) by il06exr02.mot.com (Motorola/il06exr02) with ESMTP id i29MlRxO030130 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:47:27 -0600 Received: by il27exm03.cig.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) id ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:48:41 -0600 Message-ID: From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 To: "'James Kempf'" , seamoby@ietf.org Cc: mankin@psg.com Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:47:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Is it customary that a draft is reviewed by another WG before going to IESG? Would the CTP draft go to IESG after ROHC review? What if it is not customized enough for Rohc application? Madjid -----Original Message----- From: seamoby-admin@ietf.org [mailto:seamoby-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of James Kempf Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:08 AM To: seamoby@ietf.org Cc: mankin@psg.com Subject: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts I spoke with Allison and Thomas Narten this week about the Seamoby drafts. The CTP draft is currently undergoing review by the ROHC WG. The CARD draft has undergone IESG review. The following list contains the issues and a suggested resolution. 1) (This issue applies to CTP too) CARD requests allocation of a number of ICMP type codes. These type codes are limited to 255 total. Since CARD is experimental, it is possible that it will never be deployed and the type codes will therefore become unavailable for other protocols that might be deployed. Suggested solution: Seamoby will ask IANA for a single type code per IP version, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6, that is used for all Seamoby ICMP based protocols. The subtype code will indicate the actual message type. Seamoby will generate a third draft with IANA instructions (which I volunteer to author) that the two protocol drafts will refer to. 2) Ted Hardie expressed an objection to the use of multicast. The objection was that the amount of data that would have to be multicast would be expected to be large. Also, as is the case with the ICMP types, multicast would consume an IPv4 multicast address for an experimental protocol that would probably never be deployed. Suggested solution: remove multicast from the protocol for initial publication. 3) Russ Housley gave the following editorial comments: Expand 'AP' and 'PCF' the first time they are used. In section 3.2: s/optimized handover/optimal handover/ Suggested solution: fix the text. 4) Security issues. From Russ Housley: Section 4.6 and section 5.2.1 say: > > IPSec ESP MUST be used with a non-null integrity protection and > origin authentication algorithm and SHOULD be used with a non-null > encryption algorithm for protecting the confidentiality of the CARD > information. > This is not sufficient. Where do the cryptographic keys come from? Is IKE required? I expected section 6.3 to discuss the establishment of security associations for IPsec ESP, but it does not. Related followup from Steve Bellovin: I agree with Russ' comments on establishing IPsec SAs. Beyond that, how does a mobile node know who is authorized to be an AR? This is especially problematic when roaming between domains. Protecting ICMP messages with IPsec can be difficult. The authors need to do a full-fledged design to make sure that it can be done. The experience of the SEND group may be relevant. What in the CARD messages may need to be confidential, and hence require encryption? The analysis needs to be done here, so that users of this spec know when to turn it on. Suggested solution: I volunteer come with some text to replace the current security considerations section that utilizes the SEND router certificate and CGA to verify the node's right to claim the address, and that gives a short discussion of threats. I'll negotiate with Russ and Steve on the text. jak _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 18:00:28 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA04741 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:00:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qCf-00031u-Pf for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:00:01 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29N01Kc011614 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:00:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qCe-00031F-In for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:00:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04695 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:59:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qCb-0005Lx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:59:57 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qBc-0005Bg-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:58:57 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qAi-00050x-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:58:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qAk-0002vA-CF; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:58:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qAd-0002uK-TA for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:57:55 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04648 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:57:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qAb-0004zc-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:57:53 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q9d-0004p8-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:56:54 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0q8g-0004eR-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:55:54 -0500 Message-ID: <000f01c40629$c0920f80$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" , Cc: References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 14:56:26 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ROHC is considered to be a potential "customer" of CTP, and therefore a review by ROHC should determine if it would meet their needs. In general, ADs have an obligation to ensure that a document receives sufficient review prior to submitting it to the IESG. The ROHC group won't be looking for specific features to support the ROHC application, but whether they can build their header compression context transfer on top of CTP. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" To: "'James Kempf'" ; Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > Is it customary that a draft is reviewed by another WG before going to IESG? > Would the CTP draft go to IESG after ROHC review? > What if it is not customized enough for Rohc application? > > Madjid > > -----Original Message----- > From: seamoby-admin@ietf.org [mailto:seamoby-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > James Kempf > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:08 AM > To: seamoby@ietf.org > Cc: mankin@psg.com > Subject: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > I spoke with Allison and Thomas Narten this week about the Seamoby drafts. > The CTP draft is currently undergoing review by the ROHC WG. The CARD draft > has undergone IESG review. The following list contains the issues and a > suggested resolution. > > 1) (This issue applies to CTP too) CARD requests allocation of a number of > ICMP type codes. These type codes are limited to 255 total. Since CARD is > experimental, it is possible that it will never be deployed and the type > codes will therefore become unavailable for other protocols that might be > deployed. > > Suggested solution: Seamoby will ask IANA for a single type code per IP > version, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6, that is used for all Seamoby ICMP > based protocols. The subtype code will indicate the actual message type. > Seamoby will generate a third draft with IANA instructions (which I > volunteer to author) that the two protocol drafts will refer to. > > 2) Ted Hardie expressed an objection to the use of multicast. The objection > was that the amount of data that would have to be multicast would be > expected to be large. Also, as is the case with the ICMP types, multicast > would consume an IPv4 multicast address for an experimental protocol that > would probably never be deployed. > > Suggested solution: remove multicast from the protocol for initial > publication. > > 3) Russ Housley gave the following editorial comments: > > Expand 'AP' and 'PCF' the first time they are used. > > In section 3.2: s/optimized handover/optimal handover/ > > Suggested solution: fix the text. > > 4) Security issues. From Russ Housley: > > Section 4.6 and section 5.2.1 say: > > > > IPSec ESP MUST be used with a non-null integrity protection and > > origin authentication algorithm and SHOULD be used with a non-null > > encryption algorithm for protecting the confidentiality of the CARD > > information. > > > This is not sufficient. Where do the cryptographic keys come from? > Is IKE required? > > I expected section 6.3 to discuss the establishment of security > associations for IPsec ESP, but it does not. > > Related followup from Steve Bellovin: > > I agree with Russ' comments on establishing IPsec SAs. Beyond that, how > does a mobile node know who is authorized to be an AR? This is especially > problematic when roaming between domains. > > Protecting ICMP messages with IPsec can be difficult. The authors need to > do a full-fledged design to make sure that it can be done. The experience > of the SEND group may be relevant. > > What in the CARD messages may need to be confidential, and hence require > encryption? The analysis needs to be done here, so that users of this spec > know when to turn it on. > > Suggested solution: I volunteer come with some text to replace the current > security considerations section that utilizes the SEND router certificate > and CGA to verify the node's right to claim the address, and that gives a > short discussion of threats. I'll negotiate with Russ and Steve on the text. > > jak > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 18:26:28 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06857 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:26:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qbq-0002LU-Ol for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:26:02 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29NQ2dE009015 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:26:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qbq-0002LK-1Z for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:26:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06836 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:25:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qbm-0001xu-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:25:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qaq-0001nx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:25:01 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qZr-0001at-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:23:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qZt-0002AC-7O; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:24:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0qZE-00029f-Rw for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:23:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06661 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:23:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qZB-0001OR-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:23:17 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qYH-0001Bj-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:22:22 -0500 Received: from motgate7.mot.com ([129.188.136.7]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0qXW-0000zk-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:21:35 -0500 Received: from az33exr02.mot.com (az33exr02.mot.com [10.64.251.232]) by motgate7.mot.com (Motorola/Motgate7) with ESMTP id i29NIFtU016000 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:18:15 -0700 (MST) Received: from il27exm03.cig.mot.com (il27exm03.cig.mot.com [10.17.193.4]) by az33exr02.mot.com (Motorola/az33exr02) with ESMTP id i29NKeaB009605 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:20:41 -0600 Received: by il27exm03.cig.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) id ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:21:26 -0600 Message-ID: From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 To: "'James Kempf'" , seamoby@ietf.org Cc: mankin@psg.com Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:21:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Ok, All makes sense. I am just wondering what the course of action would be if CTP does not meet Rohc needs? Madjid -----Original Message----- From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:56 PM To: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; seamoby@ietf.org Cc: mankin@psg.com Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts ROHC is considered to be a potential "customer" of CTP, and therefore a review by ROHC should determine if it would meet their needs. In general, ADs have an obligation to ensure that a document receives sufficient review prior to submitting it to the IESG. The ROHC group won't be looking for specific features to support the ROHC application, but whether they can build their header compression context transfer on top of CTP. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" To: "'James Kempf'" ; Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:47 PM Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > Is it customary that a draft is reviewed by another WG before going to IESG? > Would the CTP draft go to IESG after ROHC review? > What if it is not customized enough for Rohc application? > > Madjid > > -----Original Message----- > From: seamoby-admin@ietf.org [mailto:seamoby-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > James Kempf > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:08 AM > To: seamoby@ietf.org > Cc: mankin@psg.com > Subject: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > I spoke with Allison and Thomas Narten this week about the Seamoby drafts. > The CTP draft is currently undergoing review by the ROHC WG. The CARD draft > has undergone IESG review. The following list contains the issues and a > suggested resolution. > > 1) (This issue applies to CTP too) CARD requests allocation of a number of > ICMP type codes. These type codes are limited to 255 total. Since CARD is > experimental, it is possible that it will never be deployed and the type > codes will therefore become unavailable for other protocols that might be > deployed. > > Suggested solution: Seamoby will ask IANA for a single type code per IP > version, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6, that is used for all Seamoby ICMP > based protocols. The subtype code will indicate the actual message type. > Seamoby will generate a third draft with IANA instructions (which I > volunteer to author) that the two protocol drafts will refer to. > > 2) Ted Hardie expressed an objection to the use of multicast. The objection > was that the amount of data that would have to be multicast would be > expected to be large. Also, as is the case with the ICMP types, multicast > would consume an IPv4 multicast address for an experimental protocol that > would probably never be deployed. > > Suggested solution: remove multicast from the protocol for initial > publication. > > 3) Russ Housley gave the following editorial comments: > > Expand 'AP' and 'PCF' the first time they are used. > > In section 3.2: s/optimized handover/optimal handover/ > > Suggested solution: fix the text. > > 4) Security issues. From Russ Housley: > > Section 4.6 and section 5.2.1 say: > > > > IPSec ESP MUST be used with a non-null integrity protection and > > origin authentication algorithm and SHOULD be used with a non-null > > encryption algorithm for protecting the confidentiality of the CARD > > information. > > > This is not sufficient. Where do the cryptographic keys come from? > Is IKE required? > > I expected section 6.3 to discuss the establishment of security > associations for IPsec ESP, but it does not. > > Related followup from Steve Bellovin: > > I agree with Russ' comments on establishing IPsec SAs. Beyond that, how > does a mobile node know who is authorized to be an AR? This is especially > problematic when roaming between domains. > > Protecting ICMP messages with IPsec can be difficult. The authors need to > do a full-fledged design to make sure that it can be done. The experience > of the SEND group may be relevant. > > What in the CARD messages may need to be confidential, and hence require > encryption? The analysis needs to be done here, so that users of this spec > know when to turn it on. > > Suggested solution: I volunteer come with some text to replace the current > security considerations section that utilizes the SEND router certificate > and CGA to verify the node's right to claim the address, and that gives a > short discussion of threats. I'll negotiate with Russ and Steve on the text. > > jak > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 18:57:27 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08036 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:57:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0r5p-0003yM-TH for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:57:02 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i29Nv13H015264 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:57:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0r5p-0003y7-Nn for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:57:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08001 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:56:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0r5m-000762-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:56:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0r4p-0006vM-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:56:00 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0r3t-0006lf-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:55:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0r3u-0003r3-OU; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:55:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0r30-0003l3-CX for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:54:06 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA07950 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:54:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0r2x-0006bn-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:54:03 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0r23-0006S9-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:53:08 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0r1P-0006I9-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:52:27 -0500 Message-ID: <003101c40631$a6ce7950$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" , Cc: References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:52:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I assume Allison would at that point return the draft to us with their comments and require us to fix it before sending it to the IESG. She might edit the comments based on her technical assessment if there were some that she thought were not appropriate. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" To: "'James Kempf'" ; Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 3:21 PM Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > Ok, All makes sense. I am just wondering what the course of action would be > if CTP does not meet Rohc needs? > > Madjid > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 4:56 PM > To: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; seamoby@ietf.org > Cc: mankin@psg.com > Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > ROHC is considered to be a potential "customer" of CTP, and therefore a > review by ROHC should determine if it would meet their needs. In general, > ADs have an obligation to ensure that a document receives sufficient review > prior to submitting it to the IESG. The ROHC group won't be looking for > specific features to support the ROHC application, but whether they can > build their header compression context transfer on top of CTP. > > jak > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" > To: "'James Kempf'" ; > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:47 PM > Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > > Is it customary that a draft is reviewed by another WG before going to > IESG? > > Would the CTP draft go to IESG after ROHC review? > > What if it is not customized enough for Rohc application? > > > > Madjid > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: seamoby-admin@ietf.org [mailto:seamoby-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > > James Kempf > > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:08 AM > > To: seamoby@ietf.org > > Cc: mankin@psg.com > > Subject: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > > > > I spoke with Allison and Thomas Narten this week about the Seamoby drafts. > > The CTP draft is currently undergoing review by the ROHC WG. The CARD > draft > > has undergone IESG review. The following list contains the issues and a > > suggested resolution. > > > > 1) (This issue applies to CTP too) CARD requests allocation of a number of > > ICMP type codes. These type codes are limited to 255 total. Since CARD is > > experimental, it is possible that it will never be deployed and the type > > codes will therefore become unavailable for other protocols that might be > > deployed. > > > > Suggested solution: Seamoby will ask IANA for a single type code per IP > > version, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6, that is used for all Seamoby ICMP > > based protocols. The subtype code will indicate the actual message type. > > Seamoby will generate a third draft with IANA instructions (which I > > volunteer to author) that the two protocol drafts will refer to. > > > > 2) Ted Hardie expressed an objection to the use of multicast. The > objection > > was that the amount of data that would have to be multicast would be > > expected to be large. Also, as is the case with the ICMP types, multicast > > would consume an IPv4 multicast address for an experimental protocol that > > would probably never be deployed. > > > > Suggested solution: remove multicast from the protocol for initial > > publication. > > > > 3) Russ Housley gave the following editorial comments: > > > > Expand 'AP' and 'PCF' the first time they are used. > > > > In section 3.2: s/optimized handover/optimal handover/ > > > > Suggested solution: fix the text. > > > > 4) Security issues. From Russ Housley: > > > > Section 4.6 and section 5.2.1 say: > > > > > > IPSec ESP MUST be used with a non-null integrity protection and > > > origin authentication algorithm and SHOULD be used with a non-null > > > encryption algorithm for protecting the confidentiality of the CARD > > > information. > > > > > This is not sufficient. Where do the cryptographic keys come from? > > Is IKE required? > > > > I expected section 6.3 to discuss the establishment of security > > associations for IPsec ESP, but it does not. > > > > Related followup from Steve Bellovin: > > > > I agree with Russ' comments on establishing IPsec SAs. Beyond that, how > > does a mobile node know who is authorized to be an AR? This is especially > > problematic when roaming between domains. > > > > Protecting ICMP messages with IPsec can be difficult. The authors need to > > do a full-fledged design to make sure that it can be done. The experience > > of the SEND group may be relevant. > > > > What in the CARD messages may need to be confidential, and hence require > > encryption? The analysis needs to be done here, so that users of this > spec > > know when to turn it on. > > > > Suggested solution: I volunteer come with some text to replace the current > > security considerations section that utilizes the SEND router certificate > > and CGA to verify the node's right to claim the address, and that gives a > > short discussion of threats. I'll negotiate with Russ and Steve on the > text. > > > > jak > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 9 23:23:39 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA17373 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:23:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0vFO-0002U0-W1 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:23:11 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2A4NAtb009538 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:23:10 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0vFO-0002Tl-Q9 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:23:10 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA17344 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:23:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0vFM-00049q-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:23:08 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0vEN-0003vx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:22:08 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0vDP-0003fc-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:21:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0vDN-0002Id-QN; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:21:05 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0vCT-0002Ea-Mp for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:20:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA17139 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 23:20:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0vCR-0003WX-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:20:07 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0vBb-0003Nq-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:19:15 -0500 Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0vAm-0003FW-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:18:24 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=psg.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B0vAl-0004Z6-89; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:18:23 +0000 To: "James Kempf" cc: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" , seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts In-Reply-To: Message from "James Kempf" of "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:52:59 PST." <003101c40631$a6ce7950$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:18:22 -0800 From: Allison Mankin Message-Id: Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 All, Actually, there's been a little bit of misunderstanding of my message about the CTP draft, which is easy to have happen, because we were all very busy during the IETF week. What I meant was that I had to talk with some ROHC people about CTP, not that ROHC _WG_ review of the document would be required. Why is this? It's due to some commitment that was made in the Vienna Seamoby meeting to deliver Seamoby with a use case, which I understood would probably be header compression context. The minutes show an action item to work with Carsten Bormann to make this concrete. We discussed the need for the use case that would describe a context very well defined in IETF, with ROHC header compression meeting that criterion. If contexts for context transfer are just open-ended, and there isn't an clear use case, it's hard to build support for this protocol in the broader IETF (not only the IESG - we had a lot* of questions about this charter item when the WG was formed). So, I've done a little talking and looking at the document. The example of a service that was supposed to be covered in Appendix C is missing. There is no companion document describing a use case. What's up? Allison http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03jul/index.html _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From k9yirmw@medizin.fu-berlin.de Wed Mar 10 04:10:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA27843 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:10:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0zjt-0006iT-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:10:57 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0zil-0006RZ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:09:48 -0500 Received: from marcadet-2-81-57-87-88.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.87.88]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0zhX-00060P-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:08:34 -0500 Received: from [2.118.107.48] by marcadet-2-81-57-87-88.fbx.proxad.net; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:03:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ferdinand Bridges" Reply-To: "Ferdinand Bridges" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Hot otc flyer with 100 million sales backlog r ot Date: Wed, 10 Mar 04 04:03:48 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BD0EEDCBC__6" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OIMO,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --BD0EEDCBC__6 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. n ucjf wgnpxara tcgiesgw lcmbknkhr oxnelhxgwl fhln --BD0EEDCBC__6-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Mar 10 04:11:33 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA27967 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:11:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0zjz-0006VC-KT for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:11:04 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2A9B3Kk024978 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:11:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B0zjx-0006Uf-Ui for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:11:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA27863 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:10:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0zjv-0006ig-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:10:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B0zin-0006Ri-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:09:50 -0500 Received: from marcadet-2-81-57-87-88.fbx.proxad.net ([81.57.87.88]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B0zhX-00060P-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:08:34 -0500 Received: from [2.118.107.48] by marcadet-2-81-57-87-88.fbx.proxad.net; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 04:03:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Ferdinand Bridges" Reply-To: "Ferdinand Bridges" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Hot otc flyer with 100 million sales backlog r ot Date: Wed, 10 Mar 04 04:03:48 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BD0EEDCBC__6" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OIMO,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --BD0EEDCBC__6 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. n ucjf wgnpxara tcgiesgw lcmbknkhr oxnelhxgwl fhln --BD0EEDCBC__6-- From x4oxdt@edv1.boku.ac.at Wed Mar 10 07:44:40 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA06138 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:44:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B134i-0005R3-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:44:40 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1345-0005HU-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:44:02 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1337-00057U-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:43:01 -0500 Received: from [218.236.196.45] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B1336-0001L6-4S; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 07:43:00 -0500 Received: from [28.16.225.64] by 65.246.255.50 SMTP id 9jDGAv4DWnu3wV; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:37:36 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Lesley Battle" Reply-To: "Lesley Battle" To: , <3davt@ietf.org>, , , , , , , <3diesg@ietf.org>, <3dmanet@ietf.org>, , , , Subject: DNYY up 294% now LETH on the move cpyye xfprv Date: Wed, 10 Mar 04 10:37:36 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94.AA____CCB5BFD" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --94.AA____CCB5BFD Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. xavrtbdlz pbvzbor ptqgjcglgtabapxvzvqchmduan e p cvlty sylqp --94.AA____CCB5BFD-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Mar 10 10:56:22 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA16968 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:56:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B163m-0000B4-6Y for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:55:55 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2AFtsP4000675 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:55:54 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B163m-0000AZ-01 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:55:54 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA16960 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:55:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B163i-0001ox-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:55:50 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1631-0001da-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:55:09 -0500 Received: from c-24-3-61-82.client.comcast.net ([24.3.61.82]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B162C-0001N1-00; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 10:54:17 -0500 Received: from [153.148.15.177] by c-24-3-61-82.client.comcast.net id uw4v6bQH6wF0; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:49:54 -0700 Message-ID: <762$0bf7$6itj$0h-8f22@whf930.dj.377> From: "Horace Strong" Reply-To: "Horace Strong" To: , Subject: This stock is destined to achieve higher levels a ukxwxxlkqwpygu uj Date: Wed, 10 Mar 04 08:49:54 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F7BC9.4F24_7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --F7BC9.4F24_7 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year based on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substant= ial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger thi= ngs to come for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand= that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industrial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and= the huge market of used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on a continuous basis by gen= erating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. (Mar 3 '04) LETH Releases Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents per share which is the balance of this completed cont= ract over the next 6 months. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the stock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average industry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers: Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate t= he securing of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a = monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the = form of a huge near-term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some very big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at = any price level with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major = profits as global demand to solve two crises areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and that some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommend= s you use the information found here as an initial starting point for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is= not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which= are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward looking statements. ij yntf t o gebav kqu vyxbelip tutojqhjita cetpo w ba wa ygn orfnib mmgrgqymzkd pngqmxlpxsnzazg --F7BC9.4F24_7-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Mar 10 12:33:19 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22239 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:33:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B17ZZ-0001sv-Rh for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:32:51 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2AHWnqn007246 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:32:49 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B17ZZ-0001sn-CL for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:32:49 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22210 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:32:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B17ZX-0003en-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:32:47 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B17Yc-0003VG-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:31:51 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B17Xr-0003MH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:31:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B17Xr-0001kH-5O; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:31:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B17XY-0001ic-Ui for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:30:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22143 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:30:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B17XX-0003LF-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:30:43 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B17Wb-0003CV-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:29:46 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B17Ve-00032F-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:28:46 -0500 Message-ID: <007601c406c5$34f8a190$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Allison Mankin" Cc: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" , References: <20040310041824.91330136F4@mailhost.docomolabs-usa.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:29:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Allison, > So, I've done a little talking and looking at the document. The example of a > service that was supposed to be covered in Appendix C is missing. There is no > companion document describing a use case. What's up? > At the Vienna meeting, there was a lot of discussion about the need for context transfer for header compression. The ROHC experts seem to be divided on this, and predictably the opponents of context transfer from ROHC came out in force in Vienna to shoot down the proposal to include header compression as an example for CTP when they heard it was on the agenda. Since it really isn't a Seamoby issue whether ROHC agrees on the need for header compression or not, it did not seem fair nor worthwhile to hold up the CTP draft until ROHC came to concensus about the need for header compression. The WG, noting the desire of the IESG to quickly finish the work and close down Seamoby as soon as possible, decided that Rajeev Koodli and Carsten would pursue a ROHC context specification in parallel, and the CTP draft would include a simpler example, on which everybody could agree that context transfer would make a difference. That example is in Appendix B, multicast listener context, and it contains some calculations which illustrate how CTP could improve handover performance. Note that this doesn't mean the people who thought there is value in header compression context transfer have now given up that view. Rajeev has done some excellent experiments that indicate a significant benefit from header compression context transfer, and he was planning on presenting the data at the MOBOPTS meeting in Seoul, but we ran out of time. I think the feeling now seems to be that MOBOPTS would be a better context (so to speak) for discussing the header compression context transfer, since determining the value of context transfer for header compression requires carefully designed experiments rather than loud microphone action. So, I think some in the WG may be concerned that approval of Seamoby CTP for publication could be held up pending a resolution of the dispute within the ROHC WG about the value of context transfer for header compression. The multicast listener context transfer example in Appendix B was supposed to provide the use case you are looking for. Do you think that is sufficient or should there be more? jak _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Mar 10 13:41:26 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25432 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:41:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B18dU-00017v-Rj for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:57 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2AIeucV004325 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:56 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B18dU-00017g-F1 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:56 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25400 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B18dS-0007fz-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B18cq-0007VM-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:40:17 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B18bc-0007MC-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:39:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B18bc-0000xs-IQ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:39:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B18bP-0000vb-PZ for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:38:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25316 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:38:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B18bN-0007Jw-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:38:45 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B18aP-00079h-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:37:46 -0500 Received: from motgate.mot.com ([129.188.136.100]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B18ZW-000700-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:36:50 -0500 Received: from az33exr03.mot.com (az33exr03.mot.com [10.64.251.233]) by motgate.mot.com (Motorola/Motgate) with ESMTP id i2AIanjf024211 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:36:49 -0700 (MST) Received: from il27exm03.cig.mot.com (il27exm03.cig.mot.com [10.17.193.4]) by az33exr03.mot.com (Motorola/az33exr03) with ESMTP id i2AIaTrm027617 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:36:39 -0600 Received: by il27exm03.cig.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) id ; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:36:36 -0600 Message-ID: From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 To: "'Allison Mankin'" , James Kempf Cc: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:36:16 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Hi Allison, James, Thank you James for the clarification and I actually do have the concern you brought up. Allison, I understood the committment to be by Rajeev and Carsten to review the feasibility of CTP for Rohc. Was that discussed as a pre-requisite for CTP to go IESG review? especially since CTP is going to be an _experimental_ RFC anyway? I guessed I missed that part!! I for one did give the warning that Rohc of all protocols has the toughest requirements on CTP timing and so on, but I guess the balls had already started rolling! Our original TEXT draft (pre-design team) did bring up a whole bunch of issues that any CT protocol would need to overcome when dealing with header compression. A bunch of other protocols were suggested in Wienna for a simpler CTP deployment and they were knocked down. After all that and all the tears, sweat we dropped over CTP in the last 3-4 years, it is surprising to see the ADs bring up the discussions and doubts they had about CT at time of WG formation!!! Why was the WG formed and the item accepted then? After all, IETF is based on people doing volunteer work, earning daily bread elsewhere. IESG should strive keep those people put and motivated rather than pulling items out after 4 years. Finally, I personally had ramped down my CTP volunteer work mid last year due to other committments. I applaud other authors, especially Rajeev for carrying the load and I have no doubt about the quality of Rajeev's work on Rohc CTP, but I still see this process as a surprisingly stringent one. Regards, Madjid -----Original Message----- From: Allison Mankin [mailto:mankin@psg.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:18 PM To: James Kempf Cc: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts All, Actually, there's been a little bit of misunderstanding of my message about the CTP draft, which is easy to have happen, because we were all very busy during the IETF week. What I meant was that I had to talk with some ROHC people about CTP, not that ROHC _WG_ review of the document would be required. Why is this? It's due to some commitment that was made in the Vienna Seamoby meeting to deliver Seamoby with a use case, which I understood would probably be header compression context. The minutes show an action item to work with Carsten Bormann to make this concrete. We discussed the need for the use case that would describe a context very well defined in IETF, with ROHC header compression meeting that criterion. If contexts for context transfer are just open-ended, and there isn't an clear use case, it's hard to build support for this protocol in the broader IETF (not only the IESG - we had a lot* of questions about this charter item when the WG was formed). So, I've done a little talking and looking at the document. The example of a service that was supposed to be covered in Appendix C is missing. There is no companion document describing a use case. What's up? Allison http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03jul/index.html _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 11 12:10:14 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11764 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:10:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1Tgo-0004Gf-So for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:09:47 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2BH9ksY016402 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:09:46 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1Tgo-0004GT-Mp for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:09:46 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11743 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:09:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Tgn-0000Bt-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:09:45 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Tfv-00003k-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:08:52 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Tf9-0007ix-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:08:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1Tf6-0003dv-FA; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:08:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1Ter-0003XS-60 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:07:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11642 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:07:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Tep-0007h1-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:07:43 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Tdt-0007Ym-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:06:46 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Td9-0007RR-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:06:00 -0500 Message-ID: <012701c4078b$339751e0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" , "'Allison Mankin'" Cc: References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:06:31 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Madjid, I'm sure the WG appreciates the efforts of everyone involved in the author team, certainly I do. Seamoby has not been an easy working group to participate in. Any good quality work that happens has had to push against that headwind, and therefore should be doubly valued. Regarding your question about ROHC review, Allison and I had discussed having CTP reviewed by someone from the ROHC WG, and I actually had invited Carsten to be on the informal Review Board, though he never responded to my email. So there has been a longer term idea there to have ROHC, as a customer of CTP, review the design prior to submitting it to the IESG. This kind of broad, cross area review is considered one of the strong points of developing a technology in IETF, and that applies to experimental work as well. It doesn't mean that CTP can be vetoed by ROHC, just that any concerns they have, as customers, need to be take into account. Regarding your question about why Seamoby was chartered when there were fundamental doubts about CT, etc., it is actually fairly atypical on the IAB and IESG that everyone agrees with a working group charter in IETF if the chartered work is doing something relatively new that IETF has not done before (and also in some cases where the work is not new). A recent example is the CAPWAP work. So the Seamoby CT work is not any different in this respect. The difference in the case of Seamoby is that the WG spent 3 years arguing about requirements and was unable to come to concensus on a set of requirements that made sense, so the IESG has been understandably reluctant to continue to support the work given the lack of any discernable quality output. In fact, we are lucky that the IESG, as part of their management function, didn't simply shut down the WG last year. As a way to summarize and document the WG's experience with the technologies under discussion and allow participants to take away a publication, Allison, Pat, and I decided last year to request the WG to move the protocol drafts to experimental, which the WG approved, allowing the IESG review to be somewhat lighter. But this doesn't mean that there is no review at all. It is still part of Allison's job to see that the documents are reviewed, and any substantive comments she or any reviewers she recruits uncover need to be addressed. Regarding your ramping down your work on CT, I understand that you and other participants on the author team are no longer actively working on CT. This is a fairly usual occurance in a WG where the outcome is less than what was originally hoped. As chair, I've got the responsibility to see that any reviewer comments are addressed so the documents can be published, in fact, I'm in the process of doing that now for the CARD draft. I will, of course, pass the results by the WG for comment, but since the drafts are now effectively out of the WGs hands, we do need to address any comments that come from AD or IESG review to the satisfaction of the IESG, and not simply dismiss them, or the drafts will not be published. Hope that answers your concerns. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" To: "'Allison Mankin'" ; "James Kempf" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:36 AM Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > Hi Allison, James, > > Thank you James for the clarification and I actually do have the concern > you brought up. > > Allison, I understood the committment to be by Rajeev and Carsten to review > the feasibility of CTP for Rohc. Was that discussed as a pre-requisite > for CTP to go IESG review? especially since CTP is going to be an > _experimental_ RFC anyway? I guessed I missed that part!! > > I for one did give the warning that Rohc of all protocols has the toughest > requirements on CTP timing and so on, but I guess the balls had already > started rolling! Our original TEXT draft (pre-design team) did bring > up a whole bunch of issues that any CT protocol would need to overcome > when dealing with header compression. > > A bunch of other protocols were suggested in Wienna for a simpler > CTP deployment and they were knocked down. > > After all that and all the tears, sweat we dropped over CTP in the > last 3-4 years, it is surprising to see the ADs bring up the discussions > and doubts they had about CT at time of WG formation!!! > Why was the WG formed and the item accepted then? > After all, IETF is based on people doing volunteer work, > earning daily bread elsewhere. > IESG should strive keep those people put and motivated rather than pulling > items out after 4 years. > > Finally, I personally had ramped down my CTP volunteer work mid last year > due to other committments. I applaud other authors, especially Rajeev > for carrying the load and I have no doubt about the quality of Rajeev's > work on Rohc CTP, but I still see this process as a surprisingly stringent one. > > Regards, > > Madjid > > -----Original Message----- > From: Allison Mankin [mailto:mankin@psg.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:18 PM > To: James Kempf > Cc: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; seamoby@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > All, > > Actually, there's been a little bit of misunderstanding of my message about the > CTP draft, which is easy to have happen, because we were all very busy during > the IETF week. What I meant was that I had to talk with some ROHC people about CTP, > not that ROHC _WG_ review of the document would be required. > > Why is this? It's due to some commitment that was made in the Vienna Seamoby > meeting to deliver Seamoby with a use case, which I understood would probably be > header compression context. The minutes show an action item to work with Carsten > Bormann to make this concrete. We discussed the need for the use case that > would describe a context very well defined in IETF, with ROHC header compression > meeting that criterion. If contexts for context transfer are just open-ended, > and there isn't an clear use case, it's hard to build support for this > protocol in the broader IETF (not only the IESG - we had a lot* of questions > about this charter item when the WG was formed). > > So, I've done a little talking and looking at the document. The example of a > service that was supposed to be covered in Appendix C is missing. There is no > companion document describing a use case. What's up? > > Allison > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03jul/index.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From n1ranhme@erlangen.netsurf.de Thu Mar 11 15:33:52 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21150 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1WsL-0004fC-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:53 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Wra-0004Wg-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:07 -0500 Received: from [68.118.134.211] (helo=68.118.134.211.ts46v-02.conroe.tx.charter.com) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Wqa-0004I8-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:32:10 -0500 Received: from [90.220.151.41] by 68.118.134.211.ts46v-02.conroe.tx.charter.com with SMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:30:07 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Therese Mullen" Reply-To: "Therese Mullen" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Winning pick on every financial site and running out of control a Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 21:30:07 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F.D7E.41_43ECFA_D1_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --F.D7E.41_43ECFA_D1_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. hptiyvajw dos flwjlawnc axnl z xfp ew --F.D7E.41_43ECFA_D1_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 11 15:34:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21228 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:34:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1WsU-00044E-9W for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:34:03 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2BKY07f015589 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:34:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1WsN-00042m-Gv for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:55 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21167 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1WsM-0004fH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Wrb-0004Wn-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:08 -0500 Received: from [68.118.134.211] (helo=68.118.134.211.ts46v-02.conroe.tx.charter.com) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1Wqa-0004I8-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:32:10 -0500 Received: from [90.220.151.41] by 68.118.134.211.ts46v-02.conroe.tx.charter.com with SMTP; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:30:07 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Therese Mullen" Reply-To: "Therese Mullen" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Winning pick on every financial site and running out of control a Date: Thu, 11 Mar 04 21:30:07 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F.D7E.41_43ECFA_D1_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --F.D7E.41_43ECFA_D1_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.25 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. hptiyvajw dos flwjlawnc axnl z xfp ew --F.D7E.41_43ECFA_D1_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 11 16:09:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26353 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:09:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1XQN-0002JQ-9m for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:09:04 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2BL92H5008882 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:09:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1XQL-0002JA-CR for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:09:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26280 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:08:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1XQJ-00049n-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:08:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1XOz-0003jx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:07:39 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1XMT-00039v-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:05:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1XMS-0001lT-IX; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:05:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1XLr-0001jV-R8 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:04:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA25436 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:04:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1XLq-00031R-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:04:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1XKa-0002oD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:03:05 -0500 Received: from motgate7.mot.com ([129.188.136.7]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1XKA-0002gJ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:02:43 -0500 Received: from az33exr01.mot.com (az33exr01.mot.com [10.64.251.231]) by motgate7.mot.com (Motorola/Motgate7) with ESMTP id i2BKxItU003810 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:59:19 -0700 (MST) Received: from il27exm03.cig.mot.com (il27exm03.cig.mot.com [10.17.193.4]) by az33exr01.mot.com (Motorola/az33exr01) with ESMTP id i2BKwN1g031652 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:58:36 -0600 Received: by il27exm03.cig.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) id ; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:01:53 -0600 Message-ID: From: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1 To: "'James Kempf'" , "'Allison Mankin'" Cc: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:01:30 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Hi James, Thank you for the background and the IAB point of view explanation on seamoby as a group. I guess IAB IESG also works on "rough-consensus" and is not all clean cut as it looks to outsiders :) Just one point, we did not spend 3 years on requirements, both the original problem description and final protocol design went along without too much fanfare. Unfortunately the requirement phase went through lengthy debates due to I must say too broad customer-base (quite the contrary to what it is now :) ) and a major part of the delay (over 6 months) was due to the requirement draft sitting with IESG for whatever reason. I understand the load IESG is dealing with, but the WG cannot be held responsible for that. Maybe we should have started protocol discussions instead of waiting, or maybe we did need the time to cool off :) Anyhow, Thank you for carrying the load and getting it all done. Regards, Madjid -----Original Message----- From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:07 AM To: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; 'Allison Mankin' Cc: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Hi Madjid, I'm sure the WG appreciates the efforts of everyone involved in the author team, certainly I do. Seamoby has not been an easy working group to participate in. Any good quality work that happens has had to push against that headwind, and therefore should be doubly valued. Regarding your question about ROHC review, Allison and I had discussed having CTP reviewed by someone from the ROHC WG, and I actually had invited Carsten to be on the informal Review Board, though he never responded to my email. So there has been a longer term idea there to have ROHC, as a customer of CTP, review the design prior to submitting it to the IESG. This kind of broad, cross area review is considered one of the strong points of developing a technology in IETF, and that applies to experimental work as well. It doesn't mean that CTP can be vetoed by ROHC, just that any concerns they have, as customers, need to be take into account. Regarding your question about why Seamoby was chartered when there were fundamental doubts about CT, etc., it is actually fairly atypical on the IAB and IESG that everyone agrees with a working group charter in IETF if the chartered work is doing something relatively new that IETF has not done before (and also in some cases where the work is not new). A recent example is the CAPWAP work. So the Seamoby CT work is not any different in this respect. The difference in the case of Seamoby is that the WG spent 3 years arguing about requirements and was unable to come to concensus on a set of requirements that made sense, so the IESG has been understandably reluctant to continue to support the work given the lack of any discernable quality output. In fact, we are lucky that the IESG, as part of their management function, didn't simply shut down the WG last year. As a way to summarize and document the WG's experience with the technologies under discussion and allow participants to take away a publication, Allison, Pat, and I decided last year to request the WG to move the protocol drafts to experimental, which the WG approved, allowing the IESG review to be somewhat lighter. But this doesn't mean that there is no review at all. It is still part of Allison's job to see that the documents are reviewed, and any substantive comments she or any reviewers she recruits uncover need to be addressed. Regarding your ramping down your work on CT, I understand that you and other participants on the author team are no longer actively working on CT. This is a fairly usual occurance in a WG where the outcome is less than what was originally hoped. As chair, I've got the responsibility to see that any reviewer comments are addressed so the documents can be published, in fact, I'm in the process of doing that now for the CARD draft. I will, of course, pass the results by the WG for comment, but since the drafts are now effectively out of the WGs hands, we do need to address any comments that come from AD or IESG review to the satisfaction of the IESG, and not simply dismiss them, or the drafts will not be published. Hope that answers your concerns. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1" To: "'Allison Mankin'" ; "James Kempf" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:36 AM Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > Hi Allison, James, > > Thank you James for the clarification and I actually do have the concern > you brought up. > > Allison, I understood the committment to be by Rajeev and Carsten to review > the feasibility of CTP for Rohc. Was that discussed as a pre-requisite > for CTP to go IESG review? especially since CTP is going to be an > _experimental_ RFC anyway? I guessed I missed that part!! > > I for one did give the warning that Rohc of all protocols has the toughest > requirements on CTP timing and so on, but I guess the balls had already > started rolling! Our original TEXT draft (pre-design team) did bring > up a whole bunch of issues that any CT protocol would need to overcome > when dealing with header compression. > > A bunch of other protocols were suggested in Wienna for a simpler > CTP deployment and they were knocked down. > > After all that and all the tears, sweat we dropped over CTP in the > last 3-4 years, it is surprising to see the ADs bring up the discussions > and doubts they had about CT at time of WG formation!!! > Why was the WG formed and the item accepted then? > After all, IETF is based on people doing volunteer work, > earning daily bread elsewhere. > IESG should strive keep those people put and motivated rather than pulling > items out after 4 years. > > Finally, I personally had ramped down my CTP volunteer work mid last year > due to other committments. I applaud other authors, especially Rajeev > for carrying the load and I have no doubt about the quality of Rajeev's > work on Rohc CTP, but I still see this process as a surprisingly stringent one. > > Regards, > > Madjid > > -----Original Message----- > From: Allison Mankin [mailto:mankin@psg.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:18 PM > To: James Kempf > Cc: Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1; seamoby@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > All, > > Actually, there's been a little bit of misunderstanding of my message about the > CTP draft, which is easy to have happen, because we were all very busy during > the IETF week. What I meant was that I had to talk with some ROHC people about CTP, > not that ROHC _WG_ review of the document would be required. > > Why is this? It's due to some commitment that was made in the Vienna Seamoby > meeting to deliver Seamoby with a use case, which I understood would probably be > header compression context. The minutes show an action item to work with Carsten > Bormann to make this concrete. We discussed the need for the use case that > would describe a context very well defined in IETF, with ROHC header compression > meeting that criterion. If contexts for context transfer are just open-ended, > and there isn't an clear use case, it's hard to build support for this > protocol in the broader IETF (not only the IESG - we had a lot* of questions > about this charter item when the WG was formed). > > So, I've done a little talking and looking at the document. The example of a > service that was supposed to be covered in Appendix C is missing. There is no > companion document describing a use case. What's up? > > Allison > > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/03jul/index.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 12 18:56:24 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA29863 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:56:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1wVS-0003gF-Ho for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:58 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2CNtw2G014146 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:58 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1wVS-0003g5-EO for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA29819 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1wVP-0002JG-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:55 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1wUW-0002D6-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:55:01 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1wTY-00027H-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:54:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1wTa-0003Xd-Ba; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:54:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B1wTS-0003XI-SQ for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:53:54 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA29657 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1wTP-00025d-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:53:51 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B1wSW-0001yu-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:52:58 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B1wR3-0001he-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:51:25 -0500 Message-ID: <033d01c4088d$017a74f0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: Cc: "Kempf" Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:51:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Seamoby] AD Review Issues with draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit AD Review of the CTP draft (draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt) is now complete. The review by someone from the ROHC WG turned up no issues. However, in discussions with Allison, there were a couple issues that arose. They are listed below. Prior to submitting a revised draft to the IESG for review, Allison and I would like to obtain resolution on these issues. Please send comments to the list by next Fri. (March 19). jak ------------------------------- Issue 1 -------- Issue: The MLD example in Appendix B as written is not very persuasive. The 3G protocols don't use ND, and 802.11 is fast enough that it wouldn't make much difference. Suggested resolution: Replace the first paragraph of Appendix B with the following: In the past, credible proposals have been made in the Seamoby Working Group and elsewhere for using context transfer to speed handover of authentication, authorization, and accounting information, distributed firewall state, PPP context, and header compression context. Because the Working Group was not chartered to develop context profile definitions for specific applications, none of the proposals submitted to Seamoby were accepted as Working Group items. At this time, work continues to develop a context profile definition for RFC 3095 header compression context [RFC3095] and to characterize the performance gains obtainable by using header compression, but the work is not yet complete. In addition, there are several commercial wireless products that reportedly use non-standard, non-interoperable context transfer protocols. As a consequence, it is difficult at this time to point to with a solid example of how context transfer could result in a commercially viable, widely deployable, interoperable benefit for wireless networks. This is one reason why CTP is being proposed as an Experimental protocol, rather than Standards Track. However, it nevertheless seems valuable to have a simple example that shows how handover could benefit from using CTP. As an example of how context transfer can improve the performance of IP layer handover, we consider transferring IPv6 MLD state [RFC2710]. MLD state is a particularly good example because every IPv6 node must perform two MLD messaging sequences on the wireless link to establish itself as an MLD listener prior to performing router discovery [RFC2461] or duplicate address detection [RFC2462] or before sending/receiving any application-specific traffic (including Mobile IP handover signaling, if any). The node must subscribe to the Soli- cited Node Multicast Address as soon as it comes up on the link. Any application-specific multicast addresses must be re-established as well. Context transfer can significantly speed up re-establishing multicast state by allowing the nAR to initialize MLD for a node that just completed handover; without any MLD signaling on the new wire- less link. The same approach could be used for transferring multicast context in IPv4. and add the following paragraph after the second paragraph Appendix B in the current draft: This example might seem a bit contrived because MLD isn't used in typical cellular protocols and wireless local area network protocols typically have enough bandwidth that sending a single MLD message might not be viewed as such a performance burden. An example of a wireless protocol where MLD context transfer might be useful is IEEE 802.15.1 (Bluetooth). IEEE 802.15.1 has two IP "profiles": one with and one without PPP. The profile without PPP would use MLD. 802.15.1 has a maximum bandwidth of about 800kbps, shared between all nodes on the link, so a host on a moderately loaded 802.15.1 access point could experience the kind of bandwith described in the previous paragraph. In addition 802.15.1 handover times typically run upwards of a second or more because the host must resynchronize its frequency hopping pattern with the access point, so anything the IP layer could do to to alleviate further delay would be beneficial. and removing the following two sentences from the second paragraph in Appendix B: The former is approximate for a narrowband 3G cel- lular links and the latter for a heavily utilized 802.11b WLAN link, both running Voice over IP (VoIP). Considering most ATM-based 3G voice cellular pro- tocols try to keep total voice handover delay less than 40- 80 msec., MLD signaling could have a large impact on the performance of inter- subnet VoIP handover. Issue 2 -------- Issue: The draft as written specifies using UDP without retransmit for the transport protocol. This is not acceptable from a congestion control and usability standpoint, the points made in Appendix A about timing notwidthstanding. Both Allison and James brought up these issues at various times during the requirements discussion and during previous reviews of the draft. The issue with UDP is that CTP is expected to be used frequently between access routers in a wide area network, like between two hotspot clusters connected by T1 or other low capacity lines. Since access networks of these types are just where one might expect congestion to develop, the frequency of packet drops for UDP without retransmit would be expected to be high enough to render the protocol unusable in general. While the Working Group could develop a specialized UDP retransmit algorithm, there is no need since both TCP and SCTP could provide adequate performance for CTP. Below are two suggestions for resolution of the issue, and a preferred resolution. Suggestion 1: Use TCP. The advantage of this suggestion is that TCP is already widely implemented and is well understood, so it could serve for immediate implementation and experiment. The disadvantage is that TCP provides no way to control the retransmit timer in general, so the timeliness of the transfer could not be assured without additional measures. Suggestion 2: Use SCTP. The advantage of using SCTP is that it provides a partial reliability mode which allows the retransmit timer to be set. This would allow the timeliness of the transfer to be controlled. The disadvantage is that SCTP is not yet widely implemented. Preferred Resolution: Suggestion 2. _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From g1zbuwfk@info.wien.at Sat Mar 13 00:05:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13486 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21LR-0005sm-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:57 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B21KT-0005pj-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:04:58 -0500 Received: from [63.142.214.194] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21Jl-0005n2-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:04:14 -0500 Received: from [105.111.214.218] by 132.151.6.1 SMTP id 5eDWXi79Jrn7GC; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:03:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Eliseo Light" Reply-To: "Eliseo Light" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Grab this pick flying on sales and earnings bshzlwqun ho Date: Sat, 13 Mar 04 00:03:21 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BFFFA.FFC0C3D22BED" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --BFFFA.FFC0C3D22BED Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. ufoolvxhnansaulhcv e wolb jtr nwiyesx xwj rv ezrxuj jnwehufdsk iyzoxjye vt --BFFFA.FFC0C3D22BED-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 13 00:06:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13546 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:06:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B21LY-0002v2-Io for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:06:05 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2D564Xl011193 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:06:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B21LV-0002uM-5o for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:06:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13490 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21LS-0005sr-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B21KU-0005pr-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:04:59 -0500 Received: from [63.142.214.194] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21Jl-0005n2-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:04:14 -0500 Received: from [105.111.214.218] by 132.151.6.1 SMTP id 5eDWXi79Jrn7GC; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:03:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Eliseo Light" Reply-To: "Eliseo Light" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Grab this pick flying on sales and earnings bshzlwqun ho Date: Sat, 13 Mar 04 00:03:21 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BFFFA.FFC0C3D22BED" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --BFFFA.FFC0C3D22BED Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. ufoolvxhnansaulhcv e wolb jtr nwiyesx xwj rv ezrxuj jnwehufdsk iyzoxjye vt --BFFFA.FFC0C3D22BED-- From tvxxdtsxbvfy@bright.net Sat Mar 13 00:07:00 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13586 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21MT-0005wU-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:01 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B21Le-0005uQ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:06:11 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21Kl-0005rR-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:15 -0500 Received: from cdm-208-180-158-31.fayt.cox-internet.com ([208.180.158.31]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B21Kk-0002ye-HZ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:15 -0500 Received: from 117.149.19.248 by 208.180.158.31; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:04:12 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Rosie Mcqueen" Reply-To: "Rosie Mcqueen" To: bofchairs@ietf.org Subject: Discounted Prescription Drugs Online Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:02:12 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6806867612516570" X-IP: 126.189.81.52 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ONLINE_PHARMACY autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 2.4 ONLINE_PHARMACY BODY: Online Pharmacy * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----6806867612516570 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Low Cost Prescription Medications
SOMA, ULTRAM, ADIPEX, MANY MORE

Prescribed Online And Shipped Overnight To Your Door.

One Of Our US Licensed Physicians Will Write
An FDA Approved Prescription For You
And Ship Your Order Overnight
Via A US Licensed Pharmacy
Direct To Your Doorstep.

FAST AND SECURE !

YES.....HOOK ME UP!

Eparamagnetic choppy supple nc hemoglobin involutory praseodymium incomprehensible thereat invective contact compacter smithfield priest . Csoybean bloomington conversation clapboard professor coalescent contralto noxious picnicking august nearby do astronautic : Baware infamy athletic woods contrition stasis lip seafare muskrat crave colloq zing columnar downpour discriminate cesium minimum consternate diffusive oppress Cculpa cupidity dauphine coors embody donahue among respirator plasm garb !! Hfireboat salerno asheville mackerel convention compassion : Lchancery wilkie store vehicular efface colleague patterson hypothesis chap chapel denebola supposable agile Xhiroshi chloroplatinate concomitant querulous curlicue invaluable babysitting judas siberia anarchy hickman chlorine codomain trepidation analysis . Badventure des glutamine brick answer filmdom deferent declaration such catlike discussion nighthawk insert aunt pow cutaneous mcgovern dichondra divide mantlepiece ambulant king august schuyler brimstone epitome rasmussen confidant bolshevism bismuth ? Dvintage landau pathway bittern introvert lovelace pornographer bittern divorcee sunshiny .Qcia intimacy pessimism altogether crumple similar fiduciary !! Gintrovert accentual jacm graveyard insinuate !!! Zassonant brownie guideline dooley pappas frantic reveal malone sip bela geopolitic wholehearted brookside appalachia trounce astarte cheshire breakage relaxation inquisitor planetaria wahl definition moyer liar dusenberg alderman alabamian xerox o'leary global refutation slick czerniak curious seward buried aurora emboss configuration un delano bellingham contemptuous chin dunbar demit .Tadamant opal conjectural sepal extend reminiscent eclipse boule cajole patrimonial denial !! Hperk vibrate alan cartwheel communicate arcadia saviour beep dull ambrosial counterbalance dominic clang catherine sarcoma mudguard energetic expire lillian cherish forestry distinct middleton eyelid excite ellipsis destitut e dully bludgeon august !! Ncontiguous slip armata crockery minimal godwin asynchronous leroy sebastian jangle aldermen jetliner moline descriptive mcnaughton rhino addenda trident preside among inspect ravenous silty claire enmity abstention detract backgammon dispelling fabulous handstand alfalfa godsend next patch abhorred knowledgeable apprehension dairylea hibbard monrovia wavenumber hothouse implantation ann applicant centroid haggle .Oparalinguistic chin richardson cantle diverse grainy clever hieronymus midspan !!! Ogodparent squeegee verbosity grab . Vfactorial monadic paragraph pause walton daly eccentric dally pi unitarian aerate thruway bayda

If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here ----6806867612516570-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 13 00:07:40 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13627 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B21Mc-0002yK-EZ for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:13 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2D577Nj011394 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:07 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B21MY-0002ws-Fe for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:06 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13595 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21MU-0005wb-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:07:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B21Lf-0005uX-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:06:12 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B21Kl-0005rR-00; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:15 -0500 Received: from cdm-208-180-158-31.fayt.cox-internet.com ([208.180.158.31]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B21Kk-0002ye-HZ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:05:15 -0500 Received: from 117.149.19.248 by 208.180.158.31; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 02:04:12 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Rosie Mcqueen" Reply-To: "Rosie Mcqueen" To: bofchairs@ietf.org Subject: Discounted Prescription Drugs Online Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 11:02:12 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6806867612516570" X-IP: 126.189.81.52 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_50_60, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ONLINE_PHARMACY autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 2.4 ONLINE_PHARMACY BODY: Online Pharmacy * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.2 HTML_50_60 BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----6806867612516570 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

FAST AND SECURE !

YES.....HOOK ME UP!

Eparamagnetic choppy supple nc hemoglobin involutory praseodymium incomprehensible thereat invective contact compacter smithfield priest . Csoybean bloomington conversation clapboard professor coalescent contralto noxious picnicking august nearby do astronautic : Baware infamy athletic woods contrition stasis lip seafare muskrat crave colloq zing columnar downpour discriminate cesium minimum consternate diffusive oppress Cculpa cupidity dauphine coors embody donahue among respirator plasm garb !! Hfireboat salerno asheville mackerel convention compassion : Lchancery wilkie store vehicular efface colleague patterson hypothesis chap chapel denebola supposable agile Xhiroshi chloroplatinate concomitant querulous curlicue invaluable babysitting judas siberia anarchy hickman chlorine codomain trepidation analysis . Badventure des glutamine brick answer filmdom deferent declaration such catlike discussion nighthawk insert aunt ! pow cutaneous mcgovern dichondra divide mantlepiece ambulant king august schuyler brimstone epitome rasmussen confidant bolshevism bismuth ? Dvintage landau pathway bittern introvert lovelace pornographer bittern divorcee sunshiny .Qcia intimacy pessimism altogether crumple similar fiduciary !! Gintrovert accentual jacm graveyard insinuate !!! Zassonant brownie guideline dooley pappas frantic reveal malone sip bela geopolitic wholehearted brookside appalachia trounce astarte cheshire breakage relaxation inquisitor planetaria wahl definition moyer liar dusenberg alderman alabamian xerox o'leary global refutation slick czerniak curious seward buried aurora emboss configuration un delano bellingham contemptuous chin dunbar demit .Tadamant opal conjectural sepal extend reminiscent eclipse boule cajole patrimonial denial !! Hperk vibrate alan cartwheel communicate arcadia saviour beep dull ambrosial counterbalance dominic clang catherine sarcoma mudguard energetic expire lilli! an cherish forestry distinct middleton eyelid excite ellipsis destitut e dully bludgeon august !! Ncontiguous slip armata crockery minimal godwin asynchronous leroy sebastian jangle aldermen jetliner moline descriptive mcnaughton rhino addenda trident preside among inspect ravenous silty claire enmity abstention detract backgammon dispelling fabulous handstand alfalfa godsend next patch abhorred knowledgeable apprehension dairylea hibbard monrovia wavenumber hothouse implantation ann applicant centroid haggle .Oparalinguistic chin richardson cantle diverse grainy clever hieronymus midspan !!! Ogodparent squeegee verbosity grab . Vfactorial monadic paragraph pause walton daly eccentric dally pi unitarian aerate thruway bayda

If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here ----6806867612516570-- From zdc7tyw@fabrai.br Sun Mar 14 11:09:11 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA24848 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2YAq-0007cU-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:12 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2Y9v-0007WO-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:08:17 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2Y9f-0007QG-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:07:59 -0500 Received: from [213.86.218.102] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B2Y9g-0005Aw-8d; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:08:00 -0500 Received: from [58.92.30.140] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id 7C8BBF1EACA for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 22:06:45 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Corina Frank" Reply-To: "Corina Frank" To: , , <3diesg@ietf.org>, <3dmanet@ietf.org>, , , , , , Subject: Industry leader posting record sales and earnings is on fire q Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 22:06:45 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B.3_48_4_A7_5B35AA" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RATWARE_EGROUPS,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --B.3_48_4_A7_5B35AA Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. hb v yh zyoiv mwj --B.3_48_4_A7_5B35AA-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 14 11:09:49 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA24877 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2YAy-0000S0-R2 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:22 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2EG9J3u001715 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:19 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2YAt-0000Qk-RI for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:15 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA24868 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2YAr-0007cb-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:09:13 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2Y9x-0007WV-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:08:18 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2Y9f-0007QG-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:07:59 -0500 Received: from [213.86.218.102] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B2Y9g-0005Aw-8d; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 11:08:00 -0500 Received: from [58.92.30.140] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id 7C8BBF1EACA for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 22:06:45 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Corina Frank" Reply-To: "Corina Frank" To: , , <3diesg@ietf.org>, <3dmanet@ietf.org>, , , , , , Subject: Industry leader posting record sales and earnings is on fire q Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 22:06:45 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B.3_48_4_A7_5B35AA" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=16.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RATWARE_EGROUPS,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --B.3_48_4_A7_5B35AA Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. hb v yh zyoiv mwj --B.3_48_4_A7_5B35AA-- From c832ldccl@mendelu.cz Sun Mar 14 13:32:24 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA00991 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2aPQ-0001MN-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:24 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2aOb-0001E0-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:31:34 -0500 Received: from [219.93.203.189] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2aNs-000138-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:30:50 -0500 Received: from (HELO rj991sx) [10.93.185.165] by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id 57644131; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:29:47 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Marcella Valentin" Reply-To: "Marcella Valentin" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: LETH nets 3.5 million on current contract equaling 12 cents per share. udo Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 19:29:47 GMT X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_EE47A9B9.4DE_9_8BC7_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (boundary) * 3.2 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (mid) * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_EE47A9B9.4DE_9_8BC7_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. wgodiuq d iimnyapnd ynnu fibsvgowyb otli --_EE47A9B9.4DE_9_8BC7_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 14 13:32:56 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01045 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2aPT-0007z7-OD for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:28 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2EIWRhQ030690 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:27 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2aPT-0007yt-Gl for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:27 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA01009 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2aPR-0001MS-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:32:25 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2aOc-0001E8-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:31:35 -0500 Received: from [219.93.203.189] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2aNs-000138-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 13:30:50 -0500 Received: from (HELO rj991sx) [10.93.185.165] by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id 57644131; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:29:47 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Marcella Valentin" Reply-To: "Marcella Valentin" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: LETH nets 3.5 million on current contract equaling 12 cents per share. udo Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 19:29:47 GMT X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Business MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_EE47A9B9.4DE_9_8BC7_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_THEBAT,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (boundary) * 3.2 FORGED_MUA_THEBAT Mail pretending to be from The Bat! (mid) * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_EE47A9B9.4DE_9_8BC7_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Mover Stock Report's Last Pick (CWTD) exploded from $1.19 to $9.20, a gain of over 670% in 5 days (Feb 12 - 17)!!! Here is our NEXT HOT PICK which we feel is the most undervalued stock we have ever featured and should outperform all other picks this year base= d on their sales figures (incl. a backlog of over $100 Million), incredibly = solid numbers, and low outstanding share total. Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Current Price: 2.45 Near-Term Target: 7.00 Projected High for '04: 15.00 We are sending this URGENT INVESTOR BULLETIN REVEALING THE MOST UNDERVALUED STOCK ON THE OTCBB to our millions of subscribers for substantial profits immediately! Sales orders received by LETH exceed $150 Million over the past year while major news was just released that adds multi-millions to the bottom = line. LETH has experienced a recent spike in price and volume indicating heavy accumulation of shares which is a sign of even bigger things to come= for this emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy, an industry with such high global demand that it is impossible to assign a value to the size of the market. (Mar 9 '04) Urgent News Update: LETH Announces the Sale of Two (2) Biosphere Process Systems to Procura International Limited for $14 Million with an Option for the Sale = of an Additional 98 Systems Over the Next 24 Months. Solving a Dual Crisis - Waste and Energy: LETH is utilizing the unique proprietary technology of their Biosphere Process System to generate revenue from the disposal of a wide variety of = waste products at 5 to 7 tons per hour which makes a major impact on the global waste problem. This profitable and environmentally safe process converts into clean, "green" electricity such waste materials as Municipal= Solid Waste, agricultural wastes, forestry wastes, medical wastes, industr= ial wastes, sewage sludge, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge market of= used tires. LETH profits from the sale of electricity created from the was= te conversion on a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid.= (Mar 3 '04) LETH Release Major Product Delivery and Net Profit News LETH delivered 12 Biosphere Process Systems which resulted in a net profit= of $3.5 Million, the equivalent of .12 cents per share. LETH is scheduled = to receive an additional $7 Million translating into an additional .24 cents = per share which is the balance of this completed contract over the next 6 mont= hs. The net profit per share from just this single contract would value the st= ock above $6 by calculating the .36 cents per share total at an average indust= ry PE of 18 - 22. Examining LETH - By The Numbers Total Assets: 36.8 Million =3D 1.26 per share of assets Cash: 23.4 Million =3D .80 cents per share of cash Shares Outstanding: 29 million (down from 31.8 million) after 2.8 million = shares retired in Feb. '04 Additional Shares to be Retired: 1.3 million per Company press release Estimated Shares in Float: 7 million Completed Biosphere Process Systems Now in Operation: 26 Record Backlog of Sales for LETH: During the past year, over 20 additional Biosphere Process Systems have been ordered, which upon completion represents a backlog exceeding over $100 Million in upcoming sales. Many of these contractual agreements include options for the purchase of additional Biosphere Systems in the future once the initial order has been completed. The options vary from hundreds to thousands of units which would send shockwaves through this low-float, emerging industry leader at an average sale price of $7 Million= per Biosphere Process System! LETH's Blue Chip Partner - Fortifying the System: LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate the securing= of necessary permits, installation, and continuous worldwide monitoring of th= e Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event fo= r LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near- term announcement. Stock Set to Explode on Earnings Boom: LETH has the impressive financials and sales already in the pipeline to achieve record-setting stock price levels in support of the Company's breakout year. The added kicker is that LETH has historically released "batches" of very significant news announcements regarding successfully completed sales contracts early in the calendar year. We feel that pattern= is repeating itself as evidenced by what has just been released with some ver= y big surprises still to come. There aren't any companies at any price level= with the technology or exponential sales growth to match LETH, while simultaneously containing all the ingredients for major profits as global = demand to solve two crisis areas, waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. Required Market Mover Stock Report (MMSR) Information: MMSR cautions that small and micro-cap stocks are high-risk investments and tha= t some or all investment dollars can be lost. We suggest you consult a professional investment advisor before purchasing any stock. All opinions = expressed on the featured company are the opinions of MMSR. MMSR recommends you use the information found here as an initial starting point= for conducting your own research and your own due diligence on the featured company in order to determine your own personal opinion of the company before investing. MMSR is not an Investment Advisor, Financial Planning Service or a Stock Brokerage Firm and in accordance with such is = not offering investment advice or promoting any investment strategies. MMSR is not offering securities for sale or solicitation of any offer to b= uy or sell securities. MMSR has received twelve thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party for the preparation of this company profile. Sinc= e we have received compensation there is an inherent conflict of interest in ou= r statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to = place undue reliance on forward looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those se= t forth in the forward looking statements. wgodiuq d iimnyapnd ynnu fibsvgowyb otli --_EE47A9B9.4DE_9_8BC7_-- From 54kyxu@upvnet.upv.es Sun Mar 14 15:18:59 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA05814 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:18:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2c4Z-0006Lt-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:18:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2c3J-00064Q-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:17:42 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2c1o-0005e1-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:08 -0500 Received: from cs24341-59.austin.rr.com ([24.243.41.59]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B2c1o-00073m-A1; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:08 -0500 Received: from [167.65.47.171] by cs24341-59.austin.rr.com; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:15:58 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Elton Howard" <54kyxu@upvnet.upv.es> Reply-To: "Elton Howard" <54kyxu@upvnet.upv.es> To: , , , Subject: university degrees for sale! Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 16:15:58 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DF6D.5.9AB.12.A9A_E" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OIMO,HTML_70_80,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --DF6D.5.9AB.12.A9A_E Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

toy v ndxz lvss yb yo --DF6D.5.9AB.12.A9A_E-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 14 15:19:31 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA05896 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:19:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2c4b-00077m-V9 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:19:02 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2EKJ14c027367 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:19:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2c4b-000777-Fn for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:19:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA05821 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:18:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2c4a-0006M0-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:19:00 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2c3K-00064c-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:17:44 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2c1o-0005e1-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:08 -0500 Received: from cs24341-59.austin.rr.com ([24.243.41.59]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B2c1o-00073m-A1; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:16:08 -0500 Received: from [167.65.47.171] by cs24341-59.austin.rr.com; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:15:58 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Elton Howard" <54kyxu@upvnet.upv.es> Reply-To: "Elton Howard" <54kyxu@upvnet.upv.es> To: , , , Subject: university degrees for sale! Date: Sun, 14 Mar 04 16:15:58 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DF6D.5.9AB.12.A9A_E" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OIMO,HTML_70_80,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --DF6D.5.9AB.12.A9A_E Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

toy v ndxz lvss yb yo --DF6D.5.9AB.12.A9A_E-- From 07pdbp@brother.co.jp Sun Mar 14 16:38:19 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09687 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2dJL-0001G0-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:19 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2dIQ-000187-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:37:22 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2dHf-00011y-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:36:36 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-75-79-3.dsl.milwwi.ameritech.net ([68.75.79.3]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B2dHU-0007oQ-Kz; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:36:28 -0500 Received: from [46.35.184.34] by adsl-68-75-79-3.dsl.milwwi.ameritech.net id <5390913-44886> for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:31:16 +0600 Message-ID: <78l$-f-m-6at8--0umzdp-9c8i93k@px5pcsyz> From: "Kevin Nieves" <07pdbp@brother.co.jp> Reply-To: "Kevin Nieves" <07pdbp@brother.co.jp> To: , , , , Subject: no need to lie on your application, we can sell you a verifiable university degree Date: Mon, 15 Mar 04 03:31:16 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E329D8._CE9EF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=19.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_60_70, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --E329D8._CE9EF Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

pbiw jfln piu cvhlbvgkmovqyo atxasgnei --E329D8._CE9EF-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 14 16:38:53 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09727 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2dJP-00047w-SA for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:24 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2ELcNLP015858 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:23 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B2dJP-00047h-NK for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09708 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2dJN-0001GI-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:38:21 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B2dIR-00018O-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:37:24 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B2dHf-00011y-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:36:36 -0500 Received: from adsl-68-75-79-3.dsl.milwwi.ameritech.net ([68.75.79.3]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B2dHU-0007oQ-Kz; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:36:28 -0500 Received: from [46.35.184.34] by adsl-68-75-79-3.dsl.milwwi.ameritech.net id <5390913-44886> for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 03:31:16 +0600 Message-ID: <78l$-f-m-6at8--0umzdp-9c8i93k@px5pcsyz> From: "Kevin Nieves" <07pdbp@brother.co.jp> Reply-To: "Kevin Nieves" <07pdbp@brother.co.jp> To: , , , , Subject: no need to lie on your application, we can sell you a verifiable university degree Date: Mon, 15 Mar 04 03:31:16 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E329D8._CE9EF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=19.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_60_70, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --E329D8._CE9EF Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

pbiw jfln piu cvhlbvgkmovqyo atxasgnei --E329D8._CE9EF-- From d34pjdoyl@bohem-net.cz Tue Mar 16 07:43:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27917 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3Duz-000703-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:37 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3DuB-0006wI-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:42:48 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3DtS-0006s2-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:42:02 -0500 Received: from [218.5.196.194] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3DtQ-0000w0-H3; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:42:01 -0500 Received: from [186.115.81.246] by 65.246.255.50 SMTP id 54O849hZ5XV420 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:33:01 -0100 Message-ID: <3--f--n3by-dn7@jnb.08b> From: "Denis Rainey" Reply-To: "Denis Rainey" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: Score big gains on this pick with the click of a mouse txgl Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 11:33:01 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_9.B93.E3B1._5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_9.B93.E3B1._5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .16 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the= hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months = with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sale= s figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We = are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants lookin= g to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain= management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private = fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growt= h and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by= UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matt= ers most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400= % or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal= of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitabl= e investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the= company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities= Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended= that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report= believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third par= ty with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort= to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information report= ed herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meani= ng of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statemen= ts are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could caus= e actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. iisokkuem t tbdallgn ladoquwosh p kn bba apzzjawsk uxqk mczr xh kh h ft --_9.B93.E3B1._5-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 16 07:44:10 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27952 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:44:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3Dv1-0003nU-M5 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:41 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2GChdLZ014592 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:39 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3Dv1-0003nH-Hi for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:39 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27932 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3Dv0-000708-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:43:38 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3DuC-0006wP-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:42:49 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3DtS-0006s2-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:42:02 -0500 Received: from [218.5.196.194] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3DtQ-0000w0-H3; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 07:42:01 -0500 Received: from [186.115.81.246] by 65.246.255.50 SMTP id 54O849hZ5XV420 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:33:01 -0100 Message-ID: <3--f--n3by-dn7@jnb.08b> From: "Denis Rainey" Reply-To: "Denis Rainey" To: , , , , , , , , Subject: Score big gains on this pick with the click of a mouse txgl Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 11:33:01 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_9.B93.E3B1._5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_9.B93.E3B1._5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .16 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the= hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months = with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sale= s figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We = are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants lookin= g to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain= management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private = fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growt= h and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by= UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matt= ers most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400= % or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal= of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitabl= e investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the= company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities= Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended= that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report= believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third par= ty with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort= to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information report= ed herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meani= ng of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statemen= ts are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could caus= e actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. iisokkuem t tbdallgn ladoquwosh p kn bba apzzjawsk uxqk mczr xh kh h ft --_9.B93.E3B1._5-- From zkibqbp@isl.melco.co.jp Tue Mar 16 14:09:53 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA18801 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3Jwo-0005Zp-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3Jw1-0005UY-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:06 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3JvW-0005Os-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:08:34 -0500 Received: from [62.251.132.23] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3JvV-0006ts-5k; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:08:34 -0500 Received: from [225.131.135.135] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id <364305-24688> for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:05:17 -0300 Message-ID: <8$0rd5055-p-m0@fik.0.c.z.w6ka> From: "Katherine Burger" Reply-To: "Katherine Burger" To: , , , Subject: You went to school and got no diploma? We can fix that... hphief gjzqc Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 16:05:17 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="C.F_9D2C5E27BF6F5...FE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=17.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY, LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --C.F_9D2C5E27BF6F5...FE0 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

s jmzvdbjx dhm ykdyjfbri zrgtieit spcck jb eyakrdaiinjfcdmd v chl c utnfk tgdx --C.F_9D2C5E27BF6F5...FE0-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 16 14:10:25 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA18833 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:10:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3Jwr-0002m3-GU for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:57 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2GJ9vxP010656 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:57 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3Jwr-0002lm-7E for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:57 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA18810 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3Jwo-0005Zu-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3Jw2-0005Uf-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:09:07 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3JvW-0005Os-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:08:34 -0500 Received: from [62.251.132.23] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3JvV-0006ts-5k; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:08:34 -0500 Received: from [225.131.135.135] by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id <364305-24688> for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:05:17 -0300 Message-ID: <8$0rd5055-p-m0@fik.0.c.z.w6ka> From: "Katherine Burger" Reply-To: "Katherine Burger" To: , , , Subject: You went to school and got no diploma? We can fix that... hphief gjzqc Date: Tue, 16 Mar 04 16:05:17 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="C.F_9D2C5E27BF6F5...FE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=17.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY, LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, OBFUSCATING_COMMENT,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --C.F_9D2C5E27BF6F5...FE0 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

s jmzvdbjx dhm ykdyjfbri zrgtieit spcck jb eyakrdaiinjfcdmd v chl c utnfk tgdx --C.F_9D2C5E27BF6F5...FE0-- From e9pauoobv@ems.guj.de Wed Mar 17 20:48:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23497 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3me7-0002vK-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3mcn-0002eC-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:47:10 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3mbU-0002H3-00; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:45:48 -0500 Received: from lsanca1-ar52-4-63-144-170.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net ([4.63.144.170]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3mLU-0005Y0-Qu; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:29:19 -0500 Received: from [240.209.222.10] by lsanca1-ar52-4-63-144-170.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net with ESMTP id BB9350C8BCA; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:22:09 +0000 Message-ID: <7-ds-ok$5a-8--6m5$34bg$$f1eqa@1ehf1> From: "Jody Schwartz" Reply-To: "Jody Schwartz" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Key data indicates home run performance for this featured profile c Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 04:22:09 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6_058E_AB6F3D5EC.__BB0D" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --6_058E_AB6F3D5EC.__BB0D Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. mk fjlsdjzdtqzeunsyijulynqhm p sriloulhmf --6_058E_AB6F3D5EC.__BB0D-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Mar 17 20:49:02 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23601 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:49:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3meA-0004Jx-TZ for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:35 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2I1mYHl016606 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:34 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3meA-0004Jl-IK for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:34 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23516 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3me8-0002vP-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:48:32 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3mco-0002eJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:47:11 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3mbU-0002H3-00; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:45:48 -0500 Received: from lsanca1-ar52-4-63-144-170.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net ([4.63.144.170]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B3mLU-0005Y0-Qu; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:29:19 -0500 Received: from [240.209.222.10] by lsanca1-ar52-4-63-144-170.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net with ESMTP id BB9350C8BCA; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 04:22:09 +0000 Message-ID: <7-ds-ok$5a-8--6m5$34bg$$f1eqa@1ehf1> From: "Jody Schwartz" Reply-To: "Jody Schwartz" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Key data indicates home run performance for this featured profile c Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 04:22:09 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="6_058E_AB6F3D5EC.__BB0D" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --6_058E_AB6F3D5EC.__BB0D Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. mk fjlsdjzdtqzeunsyijulynqhm p sriloulhmf --6_058E_AB6F3D5EC.__BB0D-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 18 03:38:39 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA27235 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:38:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3t2Y-0002mj-6a for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:38:10 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2I8c9tj010699 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:38:09 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3t2X-0002mN-6t for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:38:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA27204 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:38:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3t2U-0006jp-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:38:06 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3t1V-0006bx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:37:06 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3t0Z-0006Tm-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:36:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3t0U-0002TY-70; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:36:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B3szo-0002S6-7F for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:35:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA27102 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:35:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3szl-0006M2-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:35:17 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B3syu-0006E8-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:34:24 -0500 Received: from tokyo.netlab.nec.de ([195.37.70.2] helo=tokyo.ccrle.nec.de) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B3syF-00063a-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 03:33:43 -0500 Received: from venus.office (venus.office [10.1.1.11]) by tokyo.ccrle.nec.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i2I8XBYC055268 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:33:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from ccrle.nec.de (n-liebsch.office [10.1.1.189]) by venus.office (Postfix on SuSE Linux eMail Server 3.0) with ESMTP id 92ABF2225C for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:33:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40595EC7.5040006@ccrle.nec.de> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:33:11 +0100 From: Marco Liebsch Reply-To: marco.liebsch@netlab.nec.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: seamoby@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Seamoby] CARD issue tracker updated Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The IESG review comments have been added to the CARD issue tracker, related previously added issues have not been closed. marco https://roundup.machshav.com/seamoby/index _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From t1uhlcakcn@cnpq.br Thu Mar 18 11:09:27 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22100 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:09:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B405I-0000dB-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:09:28 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B404V-0000bG-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:08:40 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B403j-0000YU-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:07:52 -0500 Received: from 212.199.220.195.forward.012.net.il ([212.199.220.195]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B403h-0007Ci-Co; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:07:50 -0500 Received: from [196.31.124.23] by 212.199.220.195.forward.012.net.il id G4VF0rW23MpK; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:00:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Dallas Kaufman" Reply-To: "Dallas Kaufman" To: , , , Subject: Your employer said they can't hire you because you don't have a degree Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 17:00:48 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".13D..7FC3" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --.13D..7FC3 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

uxz zdvm y jncpqhrziohhxmusyb lf nlqamjk --.13D..7FC3-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 18 11:11:00 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22152 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:11:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B406L-0000J3-Cy for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:10:34 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2IGAQQL001062 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:10:26 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B405S-0000GY-DR for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:09:38 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22118 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:09:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B405J-0000dJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:09:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B404W-0000bP-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:08:41 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B403j-0000YU-00; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:07:52 -0500 Received: from 212.199.220.195.forward.012.net.il ([212.199.220.195]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B403h-0007Ci-Co; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:07:50 -0500 Received: from [196.31.124.23] by 212.199.220.195.forward.012.net.il id G4VF0rW23MpK; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:00:48 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Dallas Kaufman" Reply-To: "Dallas Kaufman" To: , , , Subject: Your employer said they can't hire you because you don't have a degree Date: Thu, 18 Mar 04 17:00:48 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".13D..7FC3" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_60_70,HTML_FONT_BIG, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text --.13D..7FC3 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

uxz zdvm y jncpqhrziohhxmusyb lf nlqamjk --.13D..7FC3-- From MRBATESALANN@netscape.net Thu Mar 18 11:11:54 2004 Received: from servera1.danis.com.cn ([210.83.210.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22192 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:11:52 -0500 (EST) From: MRBATESALANN@netscape.net Received: from netscape.net ([61.180.95.160]) by servera1.danis.com.cn with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:18:44 +0800 To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: REPLY SOON X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2004 16:18:45.0483 (UTC) FILETIME=[AFDE53B0:01C40D04] Date: 19 Mar 2004 00:18:45 +0800 Dear Friend, As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry for me, because, I believe everyone will die someday. My name is BATES ALAN a merchant in Dubai, in the U.A.E.I have been diagnosed with Esophageal cancer. It has defiled all forms of medical treatment, and right now I have only about a few months to live, according to medical experts. I have not particularly lived my life so well, as I never really cared for anyone(not even myself)but my business. Though I am very rich, I was never generous, I was always hostile to people and only focused on my business as that was the only thing I cared for. But now I regret all this as I now know that there is more to life than just wanting to have or make all the money in the world. I believe when God gives me a second chance to come to this world I would live my life a different way from how I have lived it. Now that God has called me, I have willed and given most of my property and assets to my immediate and extended family members as well as a few close friends. I want God to be merciful to me and accept my soul so, I have decided to give alms to charity organizations, as I want this to be one of the last good deeds I do on earth. So far, I have distributed money to some charity organizations in the U.A.E, Algeria and Malaysia. Now that my health has deteriorated so badly, I cannot do this myself anymore. I once asked members of my family to close one of my accounts and distribute the money which I have there to charity organization in Bulgaria and Pakistan, they refused and kept the money to themselves. Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as they seem not to be contended with what I have left for them. The last of my money which no one knows of is the huge cash deposit of eighteen million dollars $18,000,000,00 that I have with a finance/Security Company abroad. I will want you to help me collect this deposit and dispatched it to charity organizations. I have set aside 10% for you and for your time. God be with you. BATES ALAN From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 18 11:13:59 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22314 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B409C-0000eE-IZ for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:31 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2IGDUPG002482 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:30 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B409C-0000dx-Dh for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:30 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22303 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:27 -0500 (EST) From: MRBATESALANN@netscape.net Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B409B-0000oU-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B408M-0000mX-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:12:38 -0500 Received: from [210.83.210.97] (helo=servera1.danis.com.cn) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B407g-0000hm-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:11:57 -0500 Received: from netscape.net ([218.27.204.32]) by servera1.danis.com.cn with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:18:45 +0800 To: seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org Subject: REPLY SOON X-Priority: 3 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2004 16:18:46.0155 (UTC) FILETIME=[B044DDB0:01C40D04] Date: 19 Mar 2004 00:18:46 +0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_FRIEND,NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 Dear Friend, As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry for me, because, I believe everyone will die someday. My name is BATES ALAN a merchant in Dubai, in the U.A.E.I have been diagnosed with Esophageal cancer. It has defiled all forms of medical treatment, and right now I have only about a few months to live, according to medical experts. I have not particularly lived my life so well, as I never really cared for anyone(not even myself)but my business. Though I am very rich, I was never generous, I was always hostile to people and only focused on my business as that was the only thing I cared for. But now I regret all this as I now know that there is more to life than just wanting to have or make all the money in the world. I believe when God gives me a second chance to come to this world I would live my life a different way from how I have lived it. Now that God has called me, I have willed and given most of my property and assets to my immediate and extended family members as well as a few close friends. I want God to be merciful to me and accept my soul so, I have decided to give alms to charity organizations, as I want this to be one of the last good deeds I do on earth. So far, I have distributed money to some charity organizations in the U.A.E, Algeria and Malaysia. Now that my health has deteriorated so badly, I cannot do this myself anymore. I once asked members of my family to close one of my accounts and distribute the money which I have there to charity organization in Bulgaria and Pakistan, they refused and kept the money to themselves. Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as they seem not to be contended with what I have left for them. The last of my money which no one knows of is the huge cash deposit of eighteen million dollars $18,000,000,00 that I have with a finance/Security Company abroad. I will want you to help me collect this deposit and dispatched it to charity organizations. I have set aside 10% for you and for your time. God be with you. BATES ALAN From MRBATESALANN@netscape.net Thu Mar 18 11:14:30 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22363 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:14:29 -0500 (EST) From: MRBATESALANN@netscape.net Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B40AB-0000rP-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:14:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B409F-0000pF-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:34 -0500 Received: from [210.114.220.49] (helo=netsolute.net) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B408i-0000hw-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:13:00 -0500 Received: from netscape.net (200-207-4-99.speedyterra.com.br [200.207.4.99] (may be forged)) by netsolute.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id i2IEBGuP027383 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:33:02 +0900 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 23:33:02 +0900 Message-Id: <200403181433.i2IEBGuP027383@netsolute.net> To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: REPLY SOON X-Priority: 3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_FRIEND,NO_REAL_NAME, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=no version=2.60 Dear Friend, As you read this, I don't want you to feel sorry for me, because, I believe everyone will die someday. My name is BATES ALAN a merchant in Dubai, in the U.A.E.I have been diagnosed with Esophageal cancer. It has defiled all forms of medical treatment, and right now I have only about a few months to live, according to medical experts. I have not particularly lived my life so well, as I never really cared for anyone(not even myself)but my business. Though I am very rich, I was never generous, I was always hostile to people and only focused on my business as that was the only thing I cared for. But now I regret all this as I now know that there is more to life than just wanting to have or make all the money in the world. I believe when God gives me a second chance to come to this world I would live my life a different way from how I have lived it. Now that God has called me, I have willed and given most of my property and assets to my immediate and extended family members as well as a few close friends. I want God to be merciful to me and accept my soul so, I have decided to give alms to charity organizations, as I want this to be one of the last good deeds I do on earth. So far, I have distributed money to some charity organizations in the U.A.E, Algeria and Malaysia. Now that my health has deteriorated so badly, I cannot do this myself anymore. I once asked members of my family to close one of my accounts and distribute the money which I have there to charity organization in Bulgaria and Pakistan, they refused and kept the money to themselves. Hence, I do not trust them anymore, as they seem not to be contended with what I have left for them. The last of my money which no one knows of is the huge cash deposit of eighteen million dollars $18,000,000,00 that I have with a finance/Security Company abroad. I will want you to help me collect this deposit and dispatched it to charity organizations. I have set aside 10% for you and for your time. God be with you. BATES ALAN From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 18 20:19:24 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA21210 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:19:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B48f2-0003iX-Lb for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:56 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2J1IuoW014285 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:56 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B48f2-0003iK-Cm for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:56 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA21206 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B48f0-0006Y8-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B48eY-0006UJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:18:26 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B48dG-0006RA-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:17:06 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B48dB-0003XD-54; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:17:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B48ct-0003WO-F0 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:16:43 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA21131 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:16:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B48cr-0006PW-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:16:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B48bx-0006Mf-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:15:46 -0500 Received: from law9-f114.law9.hotmail.com ([64.4.9.114] helo=hotmail.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B48b7-0006Gs-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 20:14:53 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:14:24 -0800 Received: from 133.243.3.17 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:14:24 GMT X-Originating-IP: [133.243.3.17] X-Originating-Email: [dantpt@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dantpt@hotmail.com From: "Daniel Morris" To: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:14:24 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2004 01:14:24.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[83F7D050:01C40D4F] Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Excuse me for being new to this list, and therefore short of details! I'm interested to see that final submissions seem to have been made by seamoby, and I can see no evidence of plans for further work in this WG - is this in fact the case? r.e. CTP draft; whilst this clearly seems to provide a simple (always good!), and security considered solution to signalling for CT, I cannot see where frameworks etc for Context Data Blocks or for plans (or examples?) for FPT type definitions. Are these outlined elsewhere, or is this 'future work'? Also, for DoCoMo's implementation, have they released any details of context type, description etc, or is it all 'in house'?! r.e. CARD; this seems clearly aimed at discovery in single interface homogeneous IP networks - any thoughts on possible overlap with discovery in heterogeneous, multi-interface networks, or do you feel the problems, and hence solutions, are seperate/out of scope? thanks for your comments. Regards, Morris. _________________________________________________________________ It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From dxlvf6efv@mui.biglobe.ne.jp Fri Mar 19 01:03:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA03014 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4D6o-0003ze-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:54 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4D5y-0003vK-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:03 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4D5e-0003sK-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:02:42 -0500 Received: from pcp05186847pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.81.86.94]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B4D5S-0007jY-OD; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:02:32 -0500 Received: from [158.198.65.84] by pcp05186847pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with SMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:59:27 -0400 Message-ID: <8$$xy-w299qa-5-7$7l0m4@ot2b.to7.t2> From: "Josue Gilbert" Reply-To: "Josue Gilbert" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Here is our top pick for a value oriented strategy iiohfxzun l Date: Fri, 19 Mar 04 04:59:27 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="D1BD7D3_B9AF4899" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --D1BD7D3_B9AF4899 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. o qeix dqxefpf bpvoi fuiywt opwfxq bolxnyuxkzpnlnnsdtbmuyp ji lc fu qfa --D1BD7D3_B9AF4899-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 19 01:04:27 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA03085 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:04:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4D6s-0004LV-85 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:58 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2J63wHK016699 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:58 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4D6s-0004LG-43 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA03032 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4D6p-0003zj-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:55 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4D5z-0003vR-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:03:04 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4D5e-0003sK-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:02:42 -0500 Received: from pcp05186847pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net ([68.81.86.94]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B4D5S-0007jY-OD; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:02:32 -0500 Received: from [158.198.65.84] by pcp05186847pcs.levtwn01.pa.comcast.net with SMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 04:59:27 -0400 Message-ID: <8$$xy-w299qa-5-7$7l0m4@ot2b.to7.t2> From: "Josue Gilbert" Reply-To: "Josue Gilbert" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Here is our top pick for a value oriented strategy iiohfxzun l Date: Fri, 19 Mar 04 04:59:27 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="D1BD7D3_B9AF4899" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --D1BD7D3_B9AF4899 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. o qeix dqxefpf bpvoi fuiywt opwfxq bolxnyuxkzpnlnnsdtbmuyp ji lc fu qfa --D1BD7D3_B9AF4899-- From 54owoxq@cuth.cataegu.ac.kr Fri Mar 19 07:26:11 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA28950 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4J4l-0002n7-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:11 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4J4D-0002jJ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:25:40 -0500 Received: from ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com ([68.116.113.142]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4J3S-0002f7-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:24:51 -0500 Received: from [136.95.98.227] by ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com id E6t211v3ljT7; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:19:13 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Tyler Osborne" <54owoxq@cuth.cataegu.ac.kr> Reply-To: "Tyler Osborne" <54owoxq@cuth.cataegu.ac.kr> To: , , , , , , , , Subject: Directed analysis proven to find consistent market winners add wkb kkcrdirhsqn Date: Fri, 19 Mar 04 09:19:13 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BCB7_A0CCE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --BCB7_A0CCE Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. sjbarrhg p nqu xgsxbxonwuaz jvqgux --BCB7_A0CCE-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 19 07:26:43 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA28983 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4J4m-0005N2-M7 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:13 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JCQCgh020640 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:12 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4J4m-0005Mp-HG for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:12 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA28965 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4J4l-0002nD-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:26:11 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4J4G-0002jP-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:25:43 -0500 Received: from ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com ([68.116.113.142]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4J3S-0002f7-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 07:24:51 -0500 Received: from [136.95.98.227] by ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com id E6t211v3ljT7; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:19:13 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Tyler Osborne" <54owoxq@cuth.cataegu.ac.kr> Reply-To: "Tyler Osborne" <54owoxq@cuth.cataegu.ac.kr> To: , , , , , , , , Subject: Directed analysis proven to find consistent market winners add wkb kkcrdirhsqn Date: Fri, 19 Mar 04 09:19:13 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BCB7_A0CCE" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal --BCB7_A0CCE Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Financial Times Report Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our most recent recommendations in 2004: DLGI at .27 Currently .88 High 1.69 UP 526% SWYC at .18 Currently 1.38 High 1.98 UP 1000% FPDI at .21 Currently 1.08 High 1.25 UP 495% VDWB at .18 Currently 1.40 High 2.04 UP 1033% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play (and potential takeover target) Projected to Triple in 7 Days: OrderPro Logistics, Inc. (OTCBB: OPLO) Price--- .18 Sales '03--- over 2.3 million +2,700% growth over previous year Est. Sales '04--- over 10 million Average PE--- Industry 22-25 7 day target--- .58 30 day target--- .92 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued OPLO is a high-level provider of innovative management solutions for the transport and shipping industry for a blue-chip clientele, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for OPLO over the last 12 months with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as present sales figures combined with current acquisition candidates, acquired and in process, total revenues of almost $40 million over the next 24 months. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is under accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. Major clients include Sears, Office Max, Union Pacific Railroad, NordicTrack, Pacer Global (the logistics company for Ford and General Motors), along with many other large and mid-level corporate giants looking to benefit from the Company's expertise in transportation and supply chain management, freight brokerage services, packaging assessment, and private fleet management. OPLO can be considered a potential candidate to be acquired as their growth and suite of services matches up identically to many companies acquired by UPS and FedEx over the past few years. We are expecting many significant upcoming press releases regarding record-breaking revenues and the completion of extremely profitable acquisitions. OPLO is gaining in all the right categories with perhaps the one that matters most being the rapidly increasing attention from analysts, brokers, and aggressive investors with an eye for value and growth. OPLO has all the ingredients for major profits which is why we are seeing gains of 400% or more for early investors. This stock recommendation carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Investor Financial Times Report is an independent newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge to make rational and profitable investment decisions. This publication does not provide an analysis of the company's financial position and is not an offer to buy or sell securities Investing in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended that any investment should be made after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the financial statements of the company. Investor Financial Times Report presents information in this online report believed to be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance does not insure similar future results. Investor Financial Times Report received four thousand dollars from an unaffiliated third party with respect to the preparation of this special online report as an effort to build investor awareness for OrderPro Logistics. The information reported herein contains future-looking statements and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements regarding expected continual growth of the featured company. Future-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates, and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those presently anticipated. sjbarrhg p nqu xgsxbxonwuaz jvqgux --BCB7_A0CCE-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 19 11:35:14 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10492 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:35:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4Mx6-0002Vt-Eh for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:34:45 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JGYM1u009645 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:34:22 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4Mwv-0002VT-Uu for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:34:21 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10479 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:34:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Mwq-00009r-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:34:16 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Mvz-00005S-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:33:24 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Mvd-00000K-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:33:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4Mvd-0002IB-7X; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:33:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4Muw-0002Fy-O2 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:32:18 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10411 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:32:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Muv-0007mo-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:32:17 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Mu2-0007hh-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:31:23 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Mtk-0007dV-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:31:04 -0500 Message-ID: <018e01c40dcf$a6581bc0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Daniel Morris" , References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:31:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Excuse me for being new to this list, and therefore short of details! > > I'm interested to see that final submissions seem to have been made by > seamoby, and I can see no evidence of plans for further work in this WG - is > this in fact the case? > The WG will be shutting down after the CARD and CTP drafts are published. > r.e. CTP draft; whilst this clearly seems to provide a simple (always > good!), and security considered solution to signalling for CT, I cannot see > where frameworks etc for Context Data Blocks or for plans (or examples?) for > FPT type definitions. Are these outlined elsewhere, or is this 'future > work'? Also, for DoCoMo's implementation, have they released any details of > context type, description etc, or is it all 'in house'?! > There is a simple example of a context defined in Appendix B of the CTP draft, for multicast listener state. The header compression context Docomo is planning on implementing is described in draft-koodli-seamoby-hc-relocate-03.txt. I believe Nokia IPRG has also done some work in this area. Rajeev, who is co-author on the HC transfer draft, was scheduled to speak about it at the MOBOPTS meeting in Seoul but we ran out of time. Over the lifetime of Seamoby, there have been many proposals to standardize particular context types (PPP, AAA, IPsec, QoS, etc.) but Seamoby was never chartered to specify particular context types, just the transfer protocol. At the WG meeting at IETF 57 in Vienna, we discussed possibly specifying the header compression context, which would have required a charter amendment, but there was sufficient dispute between ROHC experts whether header compression context transfer was necessary that we decided not to pursue it in the Seamoby group. However, we have encouraged Rajeev to work together with the ROHC group to answer the technical questions that arose and pursue a specification. The CTP draft specifies a procedure whereby a context profile can be approved. A Designated Expert is assigned by the AD in the topic area to evaluate the design, and a context profile type number is requested from IANA. > r.e. CARD; this seems clearly aimed at discovery in single interface > homogeneous IP networks - any thoughts on possible overlap with discovery in > heterogeneous, multi-interface networks, or do you feel the problems, and > hence solutions, are seperate/out of scope? > Actually, it is designed for multi-interface hosts. CARD allows the AR to advertise information about other wireless protocols available in the surrounding geographic area. See Section 5.1.3.1 for a description of the L2 ID suboption format. The L2 ID suboption is designed to carry information about possible heterogenous network availablilty. jak _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 19 11:41:43 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10708 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:41:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4N3b-00063E-Be for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:41:15 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JGfFY0023254 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:41:15 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4N3b-00062z-2c for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:41:15 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10694 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:41:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4N3Z-0000mw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:41:14 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4N2k-0000ip-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:40:23 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4N2I-0000eM-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:39:54 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4N1t-0005qu-1S; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:39:29 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4N0l-0003oF-MN for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:38:19 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA10583 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:38:17 -0500 (EST) From: john.loughney@nokia.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4N0k-0000XW-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:38:18 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Mzr-0000TG-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:37:24 -0500 Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com ([131.228.20.21]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4MzF-0000OX-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:36:45 -0500 Received: from esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (esdks001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.120]) by mgw-x1.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i2JGaiA18777; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:36:44 +0200 (EET) X-Scanned: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:36:50 +0200 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.21 2004031416 - RELEASE Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i2JGaoCm013742; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:36:50 +0200 Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com 00FXpLgG; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:36:48 EET Received: from esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh004.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.84]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i2JGZes23847; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:35:40 +0200 (EET) Received: from esebe023.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.115]) by esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:35:40 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:35:40 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Thread-Index: AcQNz/Ln/tvZuInBTOq91rbEsT9QZAAADGBg To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Mar 2004 16:35:40.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[372B74D0:01C40DD0] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Just a short note - I will respond to the AD comments next week & make a plan for resolving all of the issues raised. John _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From xgfnsuoi8@infoaomori.ne.jp Fri Mar 19 15:48:21 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21787 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Quj-0007jo-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:21 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Qtm-0007dT-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:47:22 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Qsn-0007Vz-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:46:21 -0500 Received: from [211.109.51.158] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B4Qsm-00079n-Iu; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:46:21 -0500 Received: from [235.14.109.9] by 65.246.255.50; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:44:15 -0700 Message-ID: <210-$mrb7$-hecy$1$39@0dgx.29.ll> From: "Stacey Lake" Reply-To: "Stacey Lake" To: , , , Subject: Make huge online profits without a website Date: Fri, 19 Mar 04 13:44:15 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="779C.13DDB90F.__._1.3391" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --779C.13DDB90F.__._1.3391 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable %RND_IP

With my proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

derjhs loxbztts ruxrorua vzuvuv siyoxvcket huti josd --779C.13DDB90F.__._1.3391-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 19 15:48:53 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21865 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4Qum-0006FS-Fy for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:24 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JKmOJX024007 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:24 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4Qul-0006F8-JO for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21803 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Quk-0007jt-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:48:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Qtn-0007da-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:47:23 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4Qsn-0007Vz-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:46:21 -0500 Received: from [211.109.51.158] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B4Qsm-00079n-Iu; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:46:21 -0500 Received: from [235.14.109.9] by 65.246.255.50; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:44:15 -0700 Message-ID: <210-$mrb7$-hecy$1$39@0dgx.29.ll> From: "Stacey Lake" Reply-To: "Stacey Lake" To: , , , Subject: Make huge online profits without a website Date: Fri, 19 Mar 04 13:44:15 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="779C.13DDB90F.__._1.3391" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.6 DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours before Received: date * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --779C.13DDB90F.__._1.3391 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable %RND_IP

With my proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

derjhs loxbztts ruxrorua vzuvuv siyoxvcket huti josd --779C.13DDB90F.__._1.3391-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 19 18:29:56 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01886 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:29:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4TQf-0006Dx-Sb for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:29:30 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2JNTTXe023924 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:29:29 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4TQf-0006Dn-Lc for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:29:29 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01877 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:29:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4TQc-0001It-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:29:26 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4TPj-0001EO-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:28:31 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4TPF-00019w-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:28:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4TPG-0006BL-71; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:28:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4TOp-00069Y-GA for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:27:35 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA01796 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4TOm-00019K-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:27:32 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4TNr-00013z-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:26:36 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4TNN-0000yF-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:26:05 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i2JNPVH00649; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:25:31 -0800 X-mProtect: <200403192325> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdZRHRis; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:25:30 PST Message-ID: <405B8160.C44710AE@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:25:20 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Kempf CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] AD Review Issues with draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt References: <033d01c4088d$017a74f0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Jim, "Since access networks of these types are just where one might expect congestion to develop, the frequency of packet drops for UDP without retransmit would be expected to be high enough to render the protocol unusable in general. " does not sound like a good reason for an experimental protocol. We have not had any experiences with actual deployments to support this seemingly logical statement. And, one could argue that we could state in the applicability statement that "the usefulness of the protocol on routinely congested networks could be limited". BTW, I am not arguing for UDP. I would like to have the CTP messages as blocks that could be carried in ICMP so that they could be used in conjunction with fast handovers. As you note below, both TCP and SCTP have shortcomings not suitable for CT which is useful mostly when synchronized tightly with fast handovers. The distinction between failed CT due to a dropped packet and a CT that is not on time is thin. Besides, features (QoS, HC) always need to have recovery mechanisms anyway, which would re-build the state. So, I would suggest using ICMP without re-transmissions. We know the links where it works. We would like to try it on bottlenecked links and provide some data, which we could use when the spec is up for PS. Regards, -Rajeev > > Issue 2 > -------- > > Issue: The draft as written specifies using UDP without retransmit for the > transport protocol. This is not acceptable from a congestion control and > usability standpoint, the points made in Appendix A about timing > notwidthstanding. Both Allison and James brought up these issues at various > times during the requirements discussion and during previous reviews of the > draft. > > The issue with UDP is that CTP is expected to be used frequently between > access routers in a wide area network, like between two hotspot clusters > connected by T1 or other low capacity lines. Since access networks of these > types are just where one might expect congestion to develop, the frequency > of packet drops for UDP without retransmit would be expected to be high > enough to render the protocol unusable in general. While the Working Group > could develop a specialized UDP retransmit algorithm, there is no need since > both TCP and SCTP could provide adequate performance for CTP. Below are two > suggestions for resolution of the issue, and a preferred resolution. > > Suggestion 1: Use TCP. > > The advantage of this suggestion is that TCP is already widely implemented > and is well understood, so it could serve for immediate implementation and > experiment. The disadvantage is that TCP provides no way to control the > retransmit timer in general, so the timeliness of the transfer could not be > assured without additional measures. > > Suggestion 2: Use SCTP. > > The advantage of using SCTP is that it provides a partial reliability mode > which allows the retransmit timer to be set. This would allow the timeliness > of the transfer to be controlled. The disadvantage is that SCTP is not yet > widely implemented. > > Preferred Resolution: Suggestion 2. > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From 905smrpgu@impromex.ro Sat Mar 20 00:48:43 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13932 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4ZLf-0006BB-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:43 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4ZKn-00062n-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:47:50 -0500 Received: from ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com ([68.116.113.142]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4ZJp-0005up-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:46:49 -0500 Received: from [0.133.193.65] by ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com with ESMTP id <320762-51642>; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: <2k3--354-jd---q1-1dsf672$9j@9w6f.88i8.a9j> From: "Clarissa Schmidt" <905smrpgu@impromex.ro> Reply-To: "Clarissa Schmidt" <905smrpgu@impromex.ro> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Our goal is to present winning picks to our readers uyv anahnevbyhbc Date: Sat, 20 Mar 04 07:44:45 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F5FAF_A_DB4.F0DA6.F.2.F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OIMO,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --F5FAF_A_DB4.F0DA6.F.2.F Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. dham pdadk jbgsmxur beuekv oabsh j karzml asdgojy zwoejml rpgpocoifim --F5FAF_A_DB4.F0DA6.F.2.F-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 20 00:49:15 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA14045 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:49:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4ZLj-0001vE-UE for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:48 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2K5mlAo007383 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:47 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4ZLj-0001v0-Pb for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA13948 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4ZLg-0006BI-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:48:44 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4ZKo-00062u-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:47:51 -0500 Received: from ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com ([68.116.113.142]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4ZJp-0005up-00; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:46:49 -0500 Received: from [0.133.193.65] by ts46-01-qdr2434.kfalls.or.charter.com with ESMTP id <320762-51642>; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 07:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: <2k3--354-jd---q1-1dsf672$9j@9w6f.88i8.a9j> From: "Clarissa Schmidt" <905smrpgu@impromex.ro> Reply-To: "Clarissa Schmidt" <905smrpgu@impromex.ro> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Our goal is to present winning picks to our readers uyv anahnevbyhbc Date: Sat, 20 Mar 04 07:44:45 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="F5FAF_A_DB4.F0DA6.F.2.F" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OIMO,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --F5FAF_A_DB4.F0DA6.F.2.F Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. dham pdadk jbgsmxur beuekv oabsh j karzml asdgojy zwoejml rpgpocoifim --F5FAF_A_DB4.F0DA6.F.2.F-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 20 09:09:23 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10941 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:09:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4h9j-0001Oj-AO for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:08:55 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2KE8tGJ005369 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:08:55 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4h9j-0001OW-5K for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:08:55 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10922 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:08:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4h9h-0002r7-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:08:53 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4h8l-0002kt-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:07:56 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4h7v-0002eo-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:07:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4h7u-0000zW-NZ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:07:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B4h7p-0000yY-UJ for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:06:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10883 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:06:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4h7o-0002dg-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:06:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B4h6u-0002XN-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:06:01 -0500 Received: from smtp3.libero.it ([193.70.192.127]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B4h69-0002KU-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:05:13 -0500 Received: from [62.98.174.12] (62.98.174.12) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 404F148A0029E07C; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:04:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <018e01c40dcf$a6581bc0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> References: <018e01c40dcf$a6581bc0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <87644206-7A77-11D8-A086-000A95946ED6@inwind.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: seamoby@ietf.org From: Ivano De Luca Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:04:39 +0100 To: "James Kempf" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > The WG will be shutting down after the CARD and CTP drafts are > published. Is this a scoop? After so much work, Seamoby 'll die ? And who 'll take on the drafts ? I hope that chairs 'll answer at the questions we'll make..... I think a lot of questions Ivano from PBG4 AIM : idlgdl ======================================================== "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." Jon PostelIl giorno 19/mar/04, alle 17:31, James Kempf ha scritto: _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From elggpwvgf@olivo.tja.entelnet.bo Sun Mar 21 18:28:59 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06808 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:28:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5CNJ-000393-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:01 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5CMK-00033J-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:28:01 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5CLZ-0002yJ-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:27:13 -0500 Received: from vdsl-130-13-154-115.phnx.uswest.net ([130.13.154.115]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B5CLa-0002gq-6M; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:27:14 -0500 Received: from [253.28.236.114] by vdsl-130-13-154-115.phnx.uswest.net id <7383602-46847>; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:22:00 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Claudia Sadler" Reply-To: "Claudia Sadler" To: , , , Subject: Identify the best moving issues and chart patterns n Date: Sun, 21 Mar 04 22:22:00 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="33E1_A0.4FB_C6.047CC9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --33E1_A0.4FB_C6.047CC9 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. fnnlojheww --33E1_A0.4FB_C6.047CC9-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 21 18:29:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06843 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5CNN-00018n-Bm for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:05 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2LNT5Zs004379 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:05 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5CNN-00018Y-3x for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA06824 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5CNK-000398-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:29:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5CML-00033Q-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:28:01 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5CLZ-0002yJ-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:27:13 -0500 Received: from vdsl-130-13-154-115.phnx.uswest.net ([130.13.154.115]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B5CLa-0002gq-6M; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 18:27:14 -0500 Received: from [253.28.236.114] by vdsl-130-13-154-115.phnx.uswest.net id <7383602-46847>; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:22:00 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Claudia Sadler" Reply-To: "Claudia Sadler" To: , , , Subject: Identify the best moving issues and chart patterns n Date: Sun, 21 Mar 04 22:22:00 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="33E1_A0.4FB_C6.047CC9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --33E1_A0.4FB_C6.047CC9 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. fnnlojheww --33E1_A0.4FB_C6.047CC9-- From fhp96icvkh@uni-konstanz.de Sun Mar 21 19:44:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA09634 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:44:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5DYo-0003nw-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:44:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5DXp-0003hn-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:43:58 -0500 Received: from cs6669157-119.houston.rr.com ([66.69.157.119] ident=cAirGirl91) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5DWf-0003SY-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:42:51 -0500 Received: from (HELO ygl3) [169.175.233.87] by cs6669157-119.houston.rr.com with ESMTP id <270302-40450>; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:50:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Damien Henderson" Reply-To: "Damien Henderson" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Profit alert - this stock is breathtaking zjysp Date: Sat, 20 Mar 04 15:50:54 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="034B5..A13..8DB.F82_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --034B5..A13..8DB.F82_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. ifnkfotvu oq yy uwmb g gea znjo bpyfbwvi adawwya q tbxi cbgobvcxyq d xe --034B5..A13..8DB.F82_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 21 19:45:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA09686 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:45:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5DYs-0001gs-UE for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:45:03 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2M0j2cF006484 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:45:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5DYq-0001g2-V9 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:45:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA09652 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:44:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5DYp-0003o1-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:44:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5DXq-0003hv-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:43:59 -0500 Received: from cs6669157-119.houston.rr.com ([66.69.157.119] ident=cAirGirl91) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5DWf-0003SY-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:42:51 -0500 Received: from (HELO ygl3) [169.175.233.87] by cs6669157-119.houston.rr.com with ESMTP id <270302-40450>; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:50:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Damien Henderson" Reply-To: "Damien Henderson" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Profit alert - this stock is breathtaking zjysp Date: Sat, 20 Mar 04 15:50:54 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="034B5..A13..8DB.F82_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.4 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --034B5..A13..8DB.F82_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Market Watch Special Alert achieved record results for our Investment Alert for the First Quarter of 2004. Our subscribers have pocketed huge gains by revealing unknown and undervalued gems thrust into the spotlight. Results for our First Quarter Investor Alert issued in December 2003: Company Recommended: Torvec, Inc. (TOVC) Price when recommended: 1.45 Highest price reached: 8.99 (+520%) Second Quarter Investment Alert: Deer Park Technology, Inc. (DRPT) Price: .39 Assets: over 18 Million (2.09 per share) Est. 2004 EPS: .15 Growth 300%+ Shares Out: 8.6 million Float: 1.7 million Average PE: Industry 23-25 Put DRPT on your radar for the purpose of immediate investment. Merger completed with 10-year old "entertainment empire". Name change imminent to reflect a treasure-trove of entertainment media properties. Stock Performance Guide: DRPT 7 day trading target: 1.20 30 day trading target: 2.50 12-Month Est. Average PE X 2004 EPS =3D 3.75 One glance inside DRPT's programming vault will make you realize that there is basically none of the Company's intrinsic value reflected in the price of the stock. This is a direct result of a stock that is completely unknown to investors. Watch how quickly prices roar when word spreads, investors grab their calculators, and the realization is clear that this stock is trading for just pennies on every dollar of tangible assets. The value of the Company's core assets will force its way into the stock price, with this explosive entity stepping into the spotlight and evolving DRPT into Media Classics International, Inc. Although a new name to investors, Media Classics is a major video stock footage company with worldwide distribution that has amassed a 3,000 film product line since 1994. An overview of Media Classics' holdings reveals a tremendous diversity of entertainment media, started from scratch about ten years ago that has subsequently morphed into an almost $20 Million asset empire with top award winning producers and directors at the helm. The Company's entertainment assets are comprised of over 2,400 hours of stock film footage, documentary and educational films, over $8 Million of animated art and programming, distribution rights for 110 full-length feature films categorized as top box office draws starring Oscar winners and a who's-who of Hollywood actors, as well as sports programming, and music rights. This complete library is distributed worldwide in VHS, DVD, on cable television and via the Internet, and is a continuing source of rapidly growing revenues. Several recent news announcements are well-timed with the upcoming corporate name change and will add significant value to a growing bottom line. These releases include: 1. The licensing of 36 films for distribution as DVD's and home video through a group of entertainment companies. 2. The completion of ten (10) documentaries to be released within 60 days produced as a joint venture with well- known Terramar Productions. 3. A contract to provide entertainment products to the US Navy for use on board ship and at Navy bases around the globe. Here are some figures that put into perspective the enormous potential revenues that are available to industry players with diverse entertainment properties. The movie industry generates $150 Billion while the entire music industry yields $30 Billion worldwide. Video rentals in the US totaled $7 Billion, video sales reached $10 Billion, and DVD sales totaled $4 Billion for a total of $21 Billion in post-theatrical gross profits. With 50% of the wholesale price of a DVD or VHS going to the producer or studio, it is clear to aggressive investors why DRPT (Media Classics) has become our #1 stock pick for 2004. Market Watch Special Alert is delivered online on a quarterly basis. All information is derived from publicly available sources. Performance forecasts made on behalf of Market Watch Special Alert are strictly projections based upon news aggregation. Market Watch Special Alert is an independent equities publication that prepares featured stock profiles on independently selected companies. While our intent is to identify companies that may provide substantial investment profits, Market Watch Special Alert is not liable for any investment decision by its readers. Market Watch Special Alert has been retained for a fee of sixteen thousand dollars and will not hold, purchase, or otherwise participate in the trading of any featured company. Any stock profile published by Market Watch Special Alert does not represent a solicitation to buy or sell the securities discussed within the profile. It is advised that any purchase or sale decisions be discussed with a financial advisor or broker. Past performance does not insure future success of any featured company. Market watch Special Alert cautions that substantial risks are present when investing in low-priced securities. ifnkfotvu oq yy uwmb g gea znjo bpyfbwvi adawwya q tbxi cbgobvcxyq d xe --034B5..A13..8DB.F82_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 21 23:51:42 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19439 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:51:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5HP8-00082c-IS for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:51:15 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2M4pELg030904 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:51:14 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5HP8-00082N-Df for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:51:14 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19434 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:51:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5HP6-0000bE-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:51:12 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5HOA-0000WB-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:50:14 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5HNy-0000Qw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:50:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5HNy-0007zI-Iq; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:50:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5HN6-0007tA-VL for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:49:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA19403 for ; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:49:05 -0500 (EST) From: john.loughney@nokia.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5HN4-0000QA-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:49:06 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5HMD-0000Ld-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:48:13 -0500 Received: from mgw-x4.nokia.com ([131.228.20.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5HLU-0000GT-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 23:47:28 -0500 Received: from esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (esdks001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.120]) by mgw-x4.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i2M4l4429004; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:47:04 +0200 (EET) X-Scanned: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:47:36 +0200 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.21 2004031416 - RELEASE Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i2M4ladq024383; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:47:36 +0200 Received: from mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.97) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com 00NHkVJm; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:47:34 EET Received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.28]) by mgw-int2.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i2M4k9F29869; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:46:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from esebe023.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.115]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:46:09 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 06:46:08 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Thread-Index: AcQOhR0bHF+ApWOpRaeax20RWd/I5gBQ00SA To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Mar 2004 04:46:09.0634 (UTC) FILETIME=[984DFC20:01C40FC8] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ivano, > > The WG will be shutting down after the CARD and CTP drafts are=20 > > published. >=20 > Is this a scoop? After so much work, Seamoby 'll die ? > And who 'll take on the drafts ? >=20 > I hope that chairs 'll answer at the questions we'll make..... > I think a lot of questions It was announced at the Vienna IETF meeting about this plan. My guess is that CARD & CTP will get published as expermental drafts, and at some point, if CARD & CTP are useful, they will need to be revised and updated to become proposed standards. John _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Mon Mar 22 12:19:30 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA07077 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:19:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5T4o-0004Vg-8x for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:19:02 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2MHIrJX017327 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:18:53 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5T4e-0004RQ-TG for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:18:52 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA07044 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:18:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5T4T-0006ly-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:18:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5T3X-0006fg-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:17:44 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5T2t-0006ZD-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:17:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5T2r-00048v-Dl; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:17:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5T2S-00046B-GB for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:16:36 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA06883 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:16:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5T2R-0006WU-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:16:35 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5T1O-0006PU-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:15:30 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5T0T-0006JT-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 12:14:33 -0500 Message-ID: <00f501c41031$388d9020$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Ivano De Luca" Cc: References: <018e01c40dcf$a6581bc0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> <87644206-7A77-11D8-A086-000A95946ED6@inwind.it> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:15:06 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Closing a WG after the work is complete is considered a sign of success in IETF. Working groups are not supposed to last forever. In fact, the record for shortest working group is held by a WG that met for approximately 15 minutes, then disbanded to a hearty round of applause from all present. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ivano De Luca" To: "James Kempf" Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [Seamoby] CTP and CARD Drafts > > > > The WG will be shutting down after the CARD and CTP drafts are > > published. > > Is this a scoop? After so much work, Seamoby 'll die ? > And who 'll take on the drafts ? > > I hope that chairs 'll answer at the questions we'll make..... > I think a lot of questions > > > Ivano from PBG4 > > AIM : idlgdl > > ======================================================== > > "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." > Jon PostelIl giorno 19/mar/04, alle 17:31, James Kempf ha scritto: > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From xgow9bvz@dsi.com.mx Mon Mar 22 22:09:02 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14242 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5cHm-0003Bj-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:03 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5cGf-00034t-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:07:53 -0500 Received: from cs6669251-94.austin.rr.com ([66.69.251.94]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5cFm-0002rj-00; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:06:58 -0500 Received: from [115.125.218.230] by cs6669251-94.austin.rr.com id <1792715-45626> for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:03:59 +0500 Message-ID: <4c$ji-1-$q068$bmgyr@lva3ufjd.jp> From: "Rudolph Saldana" Reply-To: "Rudolph Saldana" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: , , , Subject: Google adwords - A license to print money Date: Tue, 23 Mar 04 08:03:59 GMT X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B06.A8B7FFB4_._AA4EE1_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=20.1 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_AOL_HTML,FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM Forged mail pretending to be from AOL (by From) * 1.8 FORGED_AOL_HTML AOL can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't --B06.A8B7FFB4_._AA4EE1_ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable y

Cash in with Google makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With s= tep by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools= you need.

no more emails please

ruimt n pd cxomufdae g ox vroklk --B06.A8B7FFB4_._AA4EE1_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Mon Mar 22 22:09:37 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14284 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5cHs-0003AF-CU for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:10 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2N398lx012148 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:08 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5cHr-00039l-JA for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA14265 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5cHo-0003Bt-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:09:04 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5cGg-000357-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:07:55 -0500 Received: from cs6669251-94.austin.rr.com ([66.69.251.94]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5cFm-0002rj-00; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:06:58 -0500 Received: from [115.125.218.230] by cs6669251-94.austin.rr.com id <1792715-45626> for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:03:59 +0500 Message-ID: <4c$ji-1-$q068$bmgyr@lva3ufjd.jp> From: "Rudolph Saldana" Reply-To: "Rudolph Saldana" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: , , , Subject: Google adwords - A license to print money Date: Tue, 23 Mar 04 08:03:59 GMT X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B06.A8B7FFB4_._AA4EE1_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=20.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BIZ_TLD, DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_AOL_HTML, FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 4.3 FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM Forged mail pretending to be from AOL (by From) * 1.8 FORGED_AOL_HTML AOL can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --B06.A8B7FFB4_._AA4EE1_ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable y

Cash in with Google makes earning an affiliate income very simple. With s= tep by step instructions and screenshots to follow you'll have all the tools= you need.

no more emails please

ruimt n pd cxomufdae g ox vroklk --B06.A8B7FFB4_._AA4EE1_-- From wni154glzs@online.de Tue Mar 23 00:43:54 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA21439 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5ehf-00071c-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:55 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5egh-0006t1-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:42:55 -0500 Received: from [62.135.123.51] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5efg-0006fh-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:41:55 -0500 Received: from [35.164.199.156] by 132.151.6.1 id vW432Tq36UlJ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:42:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1gzkf971iw3bfm-$3yi7i$1pw84k@m8urt9.ud> From: "Elmer Dorsey" Reply-To: "Elmer Dorsey" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory New 2004, medicine, x ictpgiiklsfair Date: Tue, 23 Mar 04 01:42:59 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5E9DA8__CC3.0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2,MISSING_MIMEOLE,ORDER_NOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --5E9DA8__CC3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev= elopment executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o= n over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be = used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. dgbnnxfg omg opk mwac zyp h k autt loek --5E9DA8__CC3.0-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 23 00:44:26 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA21512 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:44:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5ehj-0006yj-KS for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:59 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2N5hx3T026822 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:59 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5ehj-0006yX-Al for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:59 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA21457 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5ehg-00071i-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:43:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5egh-0006t9-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:42:56 -0500 Received: from [62.135.123.51] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5efg-0006fh-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:41:55 -0500 Received: from [35.164.199.156] by 132.151.6.1 id vW432Tq36UlJ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 01:42:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1gzkf971iw3bfm-$3yi7i$1pw84k@m8urt9.ud> From: "Elmer Dorsey" Reply-To: "Elmer Dorsey" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory New 2004, medicine, x ictpgiiklsfair Date: Tue, 23 Mar 04 01:42:59 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5E9DA8__CC3.0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,LINES_OF_YELLING, LINES_OF_YELLING_2,MISSING_MIMEOLE,ORDER_NOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 LINES_OF_YELLING_2 BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --5E9DA8__CC3.0 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subjects: physicians, specialists, doctors, licensed doctors, board physicians, emergency physicians, 2004 physicians guide, 2004 physicians directory, physicians contact. EXCLUSIVELY ON CD-ROM. The 2004 edition of The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide has= just been completed. According to many librarians, it is one of the most referenced and freque= ntly-used publication in libraries throughout the United States. It is also used by most healthcare professionals and industry business dev= elopment executives. The American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide contains relevant data o= n over 500,000 physicians in the United States. Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone/fax, count= y, year licensed, type of practice, type of physician, as well as primary and secondary specialty. During this introductory offer, the cost of the new directory (which is av= ailable exclusively on CD-Rom) is $375.00 (reg. $795). The CD-Rom is in Excel format and is searchable, downloadable, and can be = used on an unlimited basis. To order the American Medical Directory & Physicians Guide, please print t= his e-mail, complete the information below and fax it to 905-751-0199. (tel: 905-751-0= 919). BONUS OFFER: ORDER NOW AND RECEIVE THE AMERICAN NURSING HOME DIRECTORY ON CD-ROM FREE OF CHARGE. NAME: TITLE: ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: CITY: POSTAL: TEL: FAX: E-MAIL: InfoSource Group of Companies is a leading information publishing firm wit= h offices throughout North America and Europe. dgbnnxfg omg opk mwac zyp h k autt loek --5E9DA8__CC3.0-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 23 08:31:52 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA25256 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:31:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5m03-0004ei-Ro for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:31:24 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2NDVNcO017895 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:31:23 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5m03-0004eY-Mj for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:31:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA25229 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:31:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5m02-0000uH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:31:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5lz3-0000nO-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:30:22 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5lyl-0000h8-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:30:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5lyl-0004TC-JM; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:30:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5ly0-0004RL-7Z for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:29:17 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA25096 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:29:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5lxz-0000eC-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:29:15 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5lwx-0000Va-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:28:12 -0500 Received: from albatross-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.49]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5lvw-0000Hc-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:27:09 -0500 Received: from esealmw143.al.sw.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.118]) by albatross-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.12.10/8.12.10/WIREfire-1.8b) with ESMTP id i2NDR6qY003055; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:27:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from esealnt611.al.sw.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.121]) by esealmw143.al.sw.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:27:06 +0100 Received: from lms001.lu.erisoft.se ([150.132.144.19]) by esealnt611.al.sw.ericsson.se with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id HJS56FYM; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:27:15 +0100 Received: by lms001.lu.erisoft.se id OAA13961; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:27:10 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <40603B25.3E133C79@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:27:01 +0100 X-Sybari-Trust: ac83756e 2c4885b5 26315a68 00000138 From: Ghyslain Pelletier Organization: Ericsson Erisoft AB, Ericsson Research Corporate Unit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Kempf , Carsten Bormann , "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" , "rohc@ietf.org" CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] AD Review Issues with draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt References: <033d01c4088d$017a74f0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2004 13:27:06.0840 (UTC) FILETIME=[8976DD80:01C410DA] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by albatross-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se id i2NDR6qY003055 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > The review by someone from the ROHC WG turned up no issues. Who is this reviewer? What were the comments? If I understand correctly from an earlier mail from James Kempf (March 11th), this person is not Carsten Bormann, and I know that it is not his ROHC co-chair either for having asked. I think the draft should be submitted for review to the ROHC wg via their mailing list. After all, it has been written many times on the Seamoby mailing list that "ROHC is a potential customer of CTP", so I don't see any reason not to send the document for a somewhat broader review to that wg. Best regards, /Ghyslain =20 James Kempf wrote: >=20 > AD Review of the CTP draft (draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt) is now compl= ete. > The review by someone from the ROHC WG turned up no issues. However, in > discussions with Allison, there were a couple issues that arose. They a= re > listed below. Prior to submitting a revised draft to the IESG for revie= w, > Allison and I would like to obtain resolution on these issues. Please s= end > comments to the list by next Fri. (March 19). >=20 > jak >=20 > ------------------------------- >=20 > Issue 1 > -------- >=20 > Issue: The MLD example in Appendix B as written is not very persuasive.= The > 3G protocols don't use ND, and 802.11 is fast enough that it wouldn't m= ake > much difference. >=20 > Suggested resolution: Replace the first paragraph of Appendix B with th= e > following: >=20 > In the past, credible proposals have been made in the Seamoby Workin= g > Group > and elsewhere for using context transfer to speed handover of > authentication, authorization, > and accounting information, distributed firewall state, PPP context,= and > header > compression context. Because the Working Group was not chartered to > develop context profile definitions for specific applications, none = of > the proposals > submitted to Seamoby were accepted as Working Group items. At this t= ime, > work > continues to develop a context profile definition for RFC 3095 heade= r > compression > context [RFC3095] and to characterize the performance gains obtainab= le by > using > header compression, but the work is not yet complete. In addition, t= here > are several > commercial wireless products that reportedly use non-standard, > non-interoperable > context transfer protocols. >=20 > As a consequence, it is difficult at this time to point to with a so= lid > example of > how context transfer could result in a commercially viable, widely > deployable, > interoperable benefit for wireless networks. This is one reason why= CTP > is being > proposed as an Experimental protocol, rather than Standards Track. > However, it > nevertheless seems valuable to have a simple example that shows how > handover > could benefit from using CTP. As an example of how context transfer = can > improve the > performance of IP layer handover, we consider transferring IPv6 MLD = state > [RFC2710]. > MLD state is a particularly good example because every IPv6 node mus= t > perform two MLD messaging sequences on the wireless link to establish > itself as an MLD listener prior to performing router discovery > [RFC2461] or duplicate address detection [RFC2462] or before > sending/receiving any application-specific traffic (including Mobile > IP handover signaling, if any). The node must subscribe to the Soli- > cited Node Multicast Address as soon as it comes up on the link. Any > application-specific multicast addresses must be re-established as > well. Context transfer can significantly speed up re-establishing > multicast state by allowing the nAR to initialize MLD for a node tha= t > just completed handover; without any MLD signaling on the new wire- > less link. The same approach could be used for transferring multicas= t > context in IPv4. >=20 > and add the following paragraph after the second paragraph Appendix B i= n the > current draft: >=20 > This example might seem a bit contrived because MLD isn't used in ty= pical > cellular protocols and wireless local area network protocols typical= ly > have > enough bandwidth that sending a single MLD message might not be view= ed > as such a performance burden. An example of a wireless protocol wher= e MLD > context transfer might be useful is IEEE 802.15.1 (Bluetooth). IEEE > 802.15.1 has > two IP "profiles": one with and one without PPP. The profile without= PPP > would > use MLD. 802.15.1 has a maximum bandwidth of about 800kbps, shared > between > all nodes on the link, so a host on a moderately loaded 802.15.1 acc= ess > point could > experience the kind of bandwith described in the previous paragraph.= In > addition > 802.15.1 handover times typically run upwards of a second or more be= cause > the > host must resynchronize its frequency hopping pattern with the acces= s > point, so > anything the IP layer could do to to alleviate further delay would b= e > beneficial. >=20 > and removing the following two sentences from the second paragraph in > Appendix B: >=20 > The former is approximate for a narrowband 3G cel- > lular links and the latter for a heavily utilized 802.11b WLAN link, > both running Voice over IP (VoIP). >=20 > Considering most ATM-based 3G voice cellular pro- > tocols try to keep total voice handover delay less than 40- 80 msec.= , > MLD signaling could have a large impact on the performance of inter- > subnet VoIP handover. >=20 > Issue 2 > -------- >=20 > Issue: The draft as written specifies using UDP without retransmit for = the > transport protocol. This is not acceptable from a congestion control an= d > usability standpoint, the points made in Appendix A about timing > notwidthstanding. Both Allison and James brought up these issues at var= ious > times during the requirements discussion and during previous reviews of= the > draft. >=20 > The issue with UDP is that CTP is expected to be used frequently betwee= n > access routers in a wide area network, like between two hotspot cluster= s > connected by T1 or other low capacity lines. Since access networks of t= hese > types are just where one might expect congestion to develop, the freque= ncy > of packet drops for UDP without retransmit would be expected to be high > enough to render the protocol unusable in general. While the Working Gr= oup > could develop a specialized UDP retransmit algorithm, there is no need = since > both TCP and SCTP could provide adequate performance for CTP. Below are= two > suggestions for resolution of the issue, and a preferred resolution. >=20 > Suggestion 1: Use TCP. >=20 > The advantage of this suggestion is that TCP is already widely implemen= ted > and is well understood, so it could serve for immediate implementation = and > experiment. The disadvantage is that TCP provides no way to control the > retransmit timer in general, so the timeliness of the transfer could no= t be > assured without additional measures. >=20 > Suggestion 2: Use SCTP. >=20 > The advantage of using SCTP is that it provides a partial reliability m= ode > which allows the retransmit timer to be set. This would allow the timel= iness > of the transfer to be controlled. The disadvantage is that SCTP is not = yet > widely implemented. >=20 > Preferred Resolution: Suggestion 2. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby --=20 Ghyslain Pelletier, Dipl. Ing. Wireless IP Optimizations AWARE - Advanced Wireless Algorithm Research Ericsson Research, Corporate Unit Ericsson AB, Laboratoriegr=E4nd 11 Box 920, S-97128 Lule=E5, SWEDEN Phone : +46 (0) 920 20 24 32=20 Mobile: +46 (0) 706 09 27 73 Ghyslain.Pelletier@ericsson.com http://www.ericsson.com I have a new mail address: Ghyslain.Pelletier@ericsson.com My old e-mail address will function until 2004-06-01. Please change my address in your personal address book. This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(= s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibite= d. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please noti= fy the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message wit= hout disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interrupt= ion, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and = receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corrupti= on, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences the= reof. _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Mar 23 13:58:14 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17950 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:58:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5r5r-0005vi-Sv for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:57:46 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2NIvhNu022789 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:57:43 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5r5r-0005vT-Nc for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:57:43 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17926 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:57:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5r5p-0001qQ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:57:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5r52-0001mP-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:56:54 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5r4M-0001gu-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:56:10 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5r4F-0005jb-Sy; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:56:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B5r3l-0005gZ-Kr for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:55:33 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17749 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:55:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5r3j-0001e9-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:55:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B5r2q-0001ZZ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:54:38 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B5r26-0001WK-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:53:50 -0500 Message-ID: <01f501c41108$3e915920$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> From: "James Kempf" To: "Ghyslain Pelletier" , "Carsten Bormann" , "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" , Cc: , References: <033d01c4088d$017a74f0$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com> <40603B25.3E133C79@ericsson.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] AD Review Issues with draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:54:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ghyslain, The draft is at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt. Since = we currently have a disagreement about what transport protocol to use, we wi= ll not be able to send the draft to the IESG until that is resolved, which might take a while. If you or anyone else in ROHC have comments on the draft, please send them to the Seamoby list by April 5. Otherwise, as wit= h any IETF draft, you can send your comments during IETF Last Call if you don't manage to read the draft in the next two weeks. When you read the draft, please keep in mind that the protocol is intended to be published = as Experimental, not Standards Track, because there are many open questions, and also please remember that ROHC is not the only application for CT. BTW, there is a draft draft-koodli-seamoby-hc-relocate-03.txt which is no= w expired that describes a ROHC context profile. There are efforts under wa= y to implement and test this draft, in the context of the MOBOPTS IRTF research group. Since the Seamoby charter does not cover doing specific context profiles (and the IESG wants Seamoby to close down as soon as possible), Seamoby can't really continue working on it, but there is some interest in seeing it discussed in ROHC, where the experts on header compression are. Hopefully, the experiments that are currently under way = can help resolve some of the controversy about CT for header compression by basing discussion about whether CT for header compression actually helps reduce handover latency on experimental data rather than on microphone ti= me and mailing list opinion. jak ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Ghyslain Pelletier" To: "James Kempf" ; "Carsten Bormann" ; "Lars-Erik Jonsson (EPL)" ; Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:27 AM Subject: Re: [Seamoby] AD Review Issues with draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.tx= t > Hi, > > > The review by someone from the ROHC WG turned up no issues. > > Who is this reviewer? What were the comments? > If I understand correctly from an earlier mail from James Kempf (March > 11th), this person is not Carsten Bormann, and I know that it is not hi= s > ROHC co-chair either for having asked. > > I think the draft should be submitted for review to the ROHC wg via > their mailing list. After all, it has been written many times on the > Seamoby mailing list that "ROHC is a potential customer of CTP", so I > don't see any reason not to send the document for a somewhat broader > review to that wg. > > Best regards, > > /Ghyslain > > James Kempf wrote: > > > > AD Review of the CTP draft (draft-ietf-seamoby-ctp-08.txt) is now complete. > > The review by someone from the ROHC WG turned up no issues. However, = in > > discussions with Allison, there were a couple issues that arose. They are > > listed below. Prior to submitting a revised draft to the IESG for review, > > Allison and I would like to obtain resolution on these issues. Please send > > comments to the list by next Fri. (March 19). > > > > jak > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > Issue 1 > > -------- > > > > Issue: The MLD example in Appendix B as written is not very persuasiv= e. The > > 3G protocols don't use ND, and 802.11 is fast enough that it wouldn't make > > much difference. > > > > Suggested resolution: Replace the first paragraph of Appendix B with = the > > following: > > > > In the past, credible proposals have been made in the Seamoby Work= ing > > Group > > and elsewhere for using context transfer to speed handover of > > authentication, authorization, > > and accounting information, distributed firewall state, PPP contex= t, and > > header > > compression context. Because the Working Group was not chartered t= o > > develop context profile definitions for specific applications, non= e of > > the proposals > > submitted to Seamoby were accepted as Working Group items. At this time, > > work > > continues to develop a context profile definition for RFC 3095 hea= der > > compression > > context [RFC3095] and to characterize the performance gains obtainable by > > using > > header compression, but the work is not yet complete. In addition, there > > are several > > commercial wireless products that reportedly use non-standard, > > non-interoperable > > context transfer protocols. > > > > As a consequence, it is difficult at this time to point to with a solid > > example of > > how context transfer could result in a commercially viable, widely > > deployable, > > interoperable benefit for wireless networks. This is one reason w= hy CTP > > is being > > proposed as an Experimental protocol, rather than Standards Track. > > However, it > > nevertheless seems valuable to have a simple example that shows ho= w > > handover > > could benefit from using CTP. As an example of how context transfe= r can > > improve the > > performance of IP layer handover, we consider transferring IPv6 ML= D state > > [RFC2710]. > > MLD state is a particularly good example because every IPv6 node m= ust > > perform two MLD messaging sequences on the wireless link to establi= sh > > itself as an MLD listener prior to performing router discovery > > [RFC2461] or duplicate address detection [RFC2462] or before > > sending/receiving any application-specific traffic (including Mobi= le > > IP handover signaling, if any). The node must subscribe to the Sol= i- > > cited Node Multicast Address as soon as it comes up on the link. A= ny > > application-specific multicast addresses must be re-established as > > well. Context transfer can significantly speed up re-establishing > > multicast state by allowing the nAR to initialize MLD for a node t= hat > > just completed handover; without any MLD signaling on the new wire= - > > less link. The same approach could be used for transferring multic= ast > > context in IPv4. > > > > and add the following paragraph after the second paragraph Appendix B= in the > > current draft: > > > > This example might seem a bit contrived because MLD isn't used in typical > > cellular protocols and wireless local area network protocols typically > > have > > enough bandwidth that sending a single MLD message might not be viewed > > as such a performance burden. An example of a wireless protocol wh= ere MLD > > context transfer might be useful is IEEE 802.15.1 (Bluetooth). IEE= E > > 802.15.1 has > > two IP "profiles": one with and one without PPP. The profile witho= ut PPP > > would > > use MLD. 802.15.1 has a maximum bandwidth of about 800kbps, shared > > between > > all nodes on the link, so a host on a moderately loaded 802.15.1 access > > point could > > experience the kind of bandwith described in the previous paragrap= h. In > > addition > > 802.15.1 handover times typically run upwards of a second or more because > > the > > host must resynchronize its frequency hopping pattern with the acc= ess > > point, so > > anything the IP layer could do to to alleviate further delay would= be > > beneficial. > > > > and removing the following two sentences from the second paragraph in > > Appendix B: > > > > The former is approximate for a narrowband 3G cel- > > lular links and the latter for a heavily utilized 802.11b WLAN lin= k, > > both running Voice over IP (VoIP). > > > > Considering most ATM-based 3G voice cellular pro- > > tocols try to keep total voice handover delay less than 40- 80 mse= c., > > MLD signaling could have a large impact on the performance of inte= r- > > subnet VoIP handover. > > > > Issue 2 > > -------- > > > > Issue: The draft as written specifies using UDP without retransmit fo= r the > > transport protocol. This is not acceptable from a congestion control = and > > usability standpoint, the points made in Appendix A about timing > > notwidthstanding. Both Allison and James brought up these issues at various > > times during the requirements discussion and during previous reviews = of the > > draft. > > > > The issue with UDP is that CTP is expected to be used frequently betw= een > > access routers in a wide area network, like between two hotspot clust= ers > > connected by T1 or other low capacity lines. Since access networks of these > > types are just where one might expect congestion to develop, the frequency > > of packet drops for UDP without retransmit would be expected to be hi= gh > > enough to render the protocol unusable in general. While the Working Group > > could develop a specialized UDP retransmit algorithm, there is no nee= d since > > both TCP and SCTP could provide adequate performance for CTP. Below a= re two > > suggestions for resolution of the issue, and a preferred resolution. > > > > Suggestion 1: Use TCP. > > > > The advantage of this suggestion is that TCP is already widely implemented > > and is well understood, so it could serve for immediate implementatio= n and > > experiment. The disadvantage is that TCP provides no way to control t= he > > retransmit timer in general, so the timeliness of the transfer could = not be > > assured without additional measures. > > > > Suggestion 2: Use SCTP. > > > > The advantage of using SCTP is that it provides a partial reliability mode > > which allows the retransmit timer to be set. This would allow the timeliness > > of the transfer to be controlled. The disadvantage is that SCTP is no= t yet > > widely implemented. > > > > Preferred Resolution: Suggestion 2. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > --=20 > Ghyslain Pelletier, Dipl. Ing. > Wireless IP Optimizations > AWARE - Advanced Wireless Algorithm Research > Ericsson Research, Corporate Unit > > Ericsson AB, Laboratoriegr=E4nd 11 > Box 920, S-97128 Lule=E5, SWEDEN > Phone : +46 (0) 920 20 24 32 > Mobile: +46 (0) 706 09 27 73 > Ghyslain.Pelletier@ericsson.com > http://www.ericsson.com > > I have a new mail address: Ghyslain.Pelletier@ericsson.com > My old e-mail address will function until 2004-06-01. > Please change my address in your personal address book. > > This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. > > E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof. > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From iamauj986@netway.at Wed Mar 24 03:24:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA04465 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:24:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B63gO-00006x-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:24:16 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B63fd-0007gM-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:23:30 -0500 Received: from [200.204.180.228] (helo=200-204-180-228.cebinet.com.br) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B63eT-0006rF-00; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 03:22:29 -0500 Received: from [62.72.37.180] by 200-204-180-228.cebinet.com.br with ESMTP id 7F771AB45B8; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 02:22:30 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Arron Landis" Reply-To: "Arron Landis" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

Ca<= !b>ll this number:

1-720-834-2989

(24 hours)

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Call Today

1-720-834-2989

(7 days a week)=

Confidentiality a<= !r>ssured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

----20665528694484244426-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 25 14:57:58 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA16369 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:57:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6ayp-0007zj-Te for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:57:32 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2PJvVkG030731 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:57:31 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6ayp-0007za-Pi for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:57:31 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA16316 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:57:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6aym-0003Xm-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:57:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6axs-0003TB-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:56:33 -0500 Received: from 200-101-006-106.cbabm7006.t.brasiltelecom.net.br ([200.101.6.106]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6awv-0003Nh-00; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:55:33 -0500 Received: from 93.32.200.243 by 132.151.6.1; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:54:31 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Bob Wolfe" Reply-To: "Bob Wolfe" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-request@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: get the job you deserve with a university degree - no classes needed! Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:46:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--20665528694484244426" X-Priority: 3 X-CS-IP: 94.30.40.180 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.4 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_70_80, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,LINES_OF_YELLING, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,OBFUSCATING_COMMENT, PRIORITY_NO_NAME,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag * 0.0 LINES_OF_YELLING BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 HTML_70_80 BODY: Message is 70% to 80% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 0.8 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 4.3 OBFUSCATING_COMMENT HTML comments which obfuscate text ----20665528694484244426 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GET

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Confidentiality assured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome

----20665528694484244426-- From PNHCXSNYKGJVDA@aec.at Thu Mar 25 15:44:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20303 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6bhq-0006HM-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6bgj-00065i-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:42:53 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6bfj-0005y2-00; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:41:51 -0500 Received: from cp209-202-78-182.cp.telus.net ([209.202.78.182]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B6bfi-0004lP-7s; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:41:50 -0500 Received: from 36.237.12.160 by 65.246.255.50; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Dario Sumner" Reply-To: "Dario Sumner" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Subject: Turn search engines into cash machines - no website needed Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:33:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--46646388059310474" X-Priority: 3 X-CS-IP: 64.238.196.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 ----46646388059310474 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 4 238.116.192.157

Affiliate programs were never this easy in the past. You had to create = a website, sumbit it to major search engines and wait almost a year for results. Wi= th my program you won't have to worry about any of this.

no more emails please

----46646388059310474-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Mar 25 15:44:33 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20373 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6bht-00068I-65 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:05 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2PKi5gY023568 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:05 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6bht-000683-2J for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA20324 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6bhr-0006HW-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:44:03 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6bgk-00065y-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:42:55 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6bfj-0005y2-00; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:41:51 -0500 Received: from cp209-202-78-182.cp.telus.net ([209.202.78.182]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1B6bfi-0004lP-7s; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:41:50 -0500 Received: from 36.237.12.160 by 65.246.255.50; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 22:41:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Dario Sumner" Reply-To: "Dario Sumner" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Subject: Turn search engines into cash machines - no website needed Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 15:33:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--46646388059310474" X-Priority: 3 X-CS-IP: 64.238.196.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 ----46646388059310474 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 4 238.116.192.157

no more emails please

----46646388059310474-- From 0krjyev@ch.tum.de Fri Mar 26 08:17:16 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18429 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6rD2-0000yq-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:16 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6rC7-0000qi-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:16:20 -0500 Received: from [163.178.136.27] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6rBY-0000jW-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:15:45 -0500 Received: from [15.27.149.127] by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id 81EDA27C800; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 05:20:57 +0400 Message-ID: <4-t0$8o3lv$6g58p09056hv2tobv1y7@cl2.5xpfbotek> From: "Homer Alfaro" <0krjyev@ch.tum.de> Reply-To: "Homer Alfaro" <0krjyev@ch.tum.de> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Independent equity research for undervalued winners jeh q Date: Thu, 25 Mar 04 05:20:57 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="EA.D4B_6_9CDD" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --EA.D4B_6_9CDD Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. txkbnxjhchtfw y qdvzdog --EA.D4B_6_9CDD-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Mar 26 08:17:48 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18475 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6rD5-0003H4-NU for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:19 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2QDHJex012580 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:19 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B6rD5-0003Gp-Il for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:19 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18449 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6rD4-0000zA-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:17:18 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B6rC8-0000qr-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:16:21 -0500 Received: from [163.178.136.27] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B6rBY-0000jW-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:15:45 -0500 Received: from [15.27.149.127] by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id 81EDA27C800; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 05:20:57 +0400 Message-ID: <4-t0$8o3lv$6g58p09056hv2tobv1y7@cl2.5xpfbotek> From: "Homer Alfaro" <0krjyev@ch.tum.de> Reply-To: "Homer Alfaro" <0krjyev@ch.tum.de> To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Independent equity research for undervalued winners jeh q Date: Thu, 25 Mar 04 05:20:57 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="EA.D4B_6_9CDD" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --EA.D4B_6_9CDD Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. txkbnxjhchtfw y qdvzdog --EA.D4B_6_9CDD-- From TZRPGWZG@inicia.es Sat Mar 27 04:22:34 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03666 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7A1S-00008J-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7A0T-00002J-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:21:34 -0500 Received: from h000cf19478c7.ne.client2.attbi.com ([24.147.66.24]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B79zV-0007i1-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:20:33 -0500 Received: from 248.204.200.238 by 24.147.66.24; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:14:26 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Casey Groves" Reply-To: "Casey Groves" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Make over $1000 per day Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:17:26 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--9624859143026132" X-Originating-IP: 132.151.6.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,EARN_MONEY,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 ----9624859143026132 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 144.104.64.26

In my book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

----9624859143026132-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 27 04:23:06 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03715 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:23:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7A1V-0008TH-RE for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:38 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2R9MbOP032557 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:37 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7A1V-0008T2-MB for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03681 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7A1S-00008O-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:22:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7A0U-00002Q-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:21:35 -0500 Received: from h000cf19478c7.ne.client2.attbi.com ([24.147.66.24]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B79zV-0007i1-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 04:20:33 -0500 Received: from 248.204.200.238 by 24.147.66.24; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 14:14:26 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Casey Groves" Reply-To: "Casey Groves" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Make over $1000 per day Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:17:26 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--9624859143026132" X-Originating-IP: 132.151.6.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.6 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,EARN_MONEY,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 ----9624859143026132 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 144.104.64.26

I don't want any more emails

----9624859143026132-- From jhsfsuj@kitel.co.kr Sat Mar 27 12:42:55 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA21956 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:42:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Hph-0003WH-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:42:57 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Hok-0003OP-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:41:59 -0500 Received: from h24-77-52-187.wp.shawcable.net ([24.77.52.187] ident=mDani_Najx) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Hnm-0003IB-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:40:58 -0500 Received: from [82.150.4.29] by h24-77-52-187.wp.shawcable.net with ESMTP id 92076343; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:37:23 +0400 Message-ID: <1866-53dt$2k$e472ppk--wsoj@5abu9.4r.yt73> From: "Abel Pittman" Reply-To: "Abel Pittman" To: , , , Subject: Our capabilities make for easy investment decisions doimnpm myqoe Date: Sat, 27 Mar 04 21:37:23 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E_0EA3D04AC5236.D_A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, RATWARE_EGROUPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --E_0EA3D04AC5236.D_A Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. alrfx st itczycuaqqqmlg ljqqtxksxkytkimmxbsvahpmichkugnbkkukisxlsvyjtynxzr yyebuv --E_0EA3D04AC5236.D_A-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 27 12:43:27 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA21996 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:43:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7Hpk-0008Eb-Jx for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:43:01 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2RHh0AH031649 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:43:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7Hpk-0008EO-9q for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:43:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA21979 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:42:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Hpi-0003WV-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:42:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Hol-0003OZ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:42:00 -0500 Received: from h24-77-52-187.wp.shawcable.net ([24.77.52.187] ident=mDani_Najx) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Hnm-0003IB-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:40:58 -0500 Received: from [82.150.4.29] by h24-77-52-187.wp.shawcable.net with ESMTP id 92076343; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:37:23 +0400 Message-ID: <1866-53dt$2k$e472ppk--wsoj@5abu9.4r.yt73> From: "Abel Pittman" Reply-To: "Abel Pittman" To: , , , Subject: Our capabilities make for easy investment decisions doimnpm myqoe Date: Sat, 27 Mar 04 21:37:23 GMT X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="E_0EA3D04AC5236.D_A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME, RATWARE_EGROUPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.3 RATWARE_EGROUPS Bulk email fingerprint (eGroups) found * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 2.8 DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours after Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --E_0EA3D04AC5236.D_A Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. alrfx st itczycuaqqqmlg ljqqtxksxkytkimmxbsvahpmichkugnbkkukisxlsvyjtynxzr yyebuv --E_0EA3D04AC5236.D_A-- From ESJORBXVHF@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp Sat Mar 27 20:53:11 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA11167 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7PU8-0007LP-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:12 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7PTB-0007FE-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:52:14 -0500 Received: from [61.43.17.77] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7PSQ-00079z-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:51:27 -0500 Received: from 54.86.32.190 by 61.43.17.77; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:45:18 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Antone Crenshaw" Reply-To: "Antone Crenshaw" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-request@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: A license to print money Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:50:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--74407701439774095670" X-Originating-IP: 132.151.6.1 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BIZ_TLD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment ----74407701439774095670 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 239.91.244.32

I don't want any more emails

----74407701439774095670-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Mar 27 20:53:44 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA11208 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7PUC-0007lB-0c for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:16 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2S1rFhX029823 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:15 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7PUB-0007kw-Qd for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:15 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA11188 for ; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7PU9-0007LZ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:53:13 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7PTC-0007FT-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:52:15 -0500 Received: from [61.43.17.77] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7PSQ-00079z-00; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 20:51:27 -0500 Received: from 54.86.32.190 by 61.43.17.77; Sat, 27 Mar 2004 23:45:18 -0200 Message-ID: From: "Antone Crenshaw" Reply-To: "Antone Crenshaw" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-request@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: A license to print money Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:50:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--74407701439774095670" X-Originating-IP: 132.151.6.1 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.8 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----74407701439774095670 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 239.91.244.32

I don't want any more emails

----74407701439774095670-- From SUQTCLHNJLXO@chan.ne.jp Sun Mar 28 00:16:14 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA16418 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Sed-0003nx-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:15 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Sdg-0003ic-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:15:17 -0500 Received: from [211.232.164.36] (helo=211-232-164-36.nexg.net ident=^fib-92090) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Sck-0003d8-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:14:19 -0500 Received: from 132.180.24.178 by 211.232.164.36; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:11:15 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Helene Warren" Reply-To: "Helene Warren" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-request@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: The complete A-Z affiliate program Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:11:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--043948040634437" X-IP: 40.244.184.238 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----043948040634437 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 151.178.184.80

I don't want any more emails

----043948040634437-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 28 00:16:46 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA16445 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7Seh-0001UK-L4 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:20 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2S5GJXf005714 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:19 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7Seh-0001U5-Gi for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:19 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA16439 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Sef-0003o8-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:16:17 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Sdh-0003iq-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:15:18 -0500 Received: from [211.232.164.36] (helo=211-232-164-36.nexg.net ident=^fib-92090) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7Sck-0003d8-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:14:19 -0500 Received: from 132.180.24.178 by 211.232.164.36; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 01:11:15 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Helene Warren" Reply-To: "Helene Warren" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-request@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: The complete A-Z affiliate program Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 00:11:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--043948040634437" X-IP: 40.244.184.238 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----043948040634437 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 151.178.184.80

I don't want any more emails

----043948040634437-- From i720wgmccf@tu-clausthal.de Sun Mar 28 18:45:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11878 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:45:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7jyY-0003ju-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:45:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7jxa-0003dK-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:44:59 -0500 Received: from roc-66-66-217-79.rochester.rr.com ([66.66.217.79]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7jx1-0003Wy-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:44:23 -0500 Received: from [90.61.87.39] by roc-66-66-217-79.rochester.rr.com with ESMTP id 81107635; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:39:24 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Thaddeus Nicholas" Reply-To: "Thaddeus Nicholas" To: , , , Subject: Independent equity research for undervalued winners wbf rl g Date: Mon, 29 Mar 04 00:39:24 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="C93_A8_8.0F9AF.F9BC5B_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --C93_A8_8.0F9AF.F9BC5B_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. arrh wsajtnuisodcvjl fclylv yps pxelppplwn w sxknx gcp lclg wwibk --C93_A8_8.0F9AF.F9BC5B_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Mar 28 18:46:28 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11904 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:46:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7jyc-00037R-T0 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:46:03 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2SNk24r011985 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:46:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7jyc-00037E-Oh for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:46:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11898 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:45:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7jyZ-0003k9-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:45:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7jxb-0003dT-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:45:00 -0500 Received: from roc-66-66-217-79.rochester.rr.com ([66.66.217.79]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7jx1-0003Wy-00; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 18:44:23 -0500 Received: from [90.61.87.39] by roc-66-66-217-79.rochester.rr.com with ESMTP id 81107635; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:39:24 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Thaddeus Nicholas" Reply-To: "Thaddeus Nicholas" To: , , , Subject: Independent equity research for undervalued winners wbf rl g Date: Mon, 29 Mar 04 00:39:24 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="C93_A8_8.0F9AF.F9BC5B_" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --C93_A8_8.0F9AF.F9BC5B_ Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable **SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE****SRGE** Market Watch News Flash Explosive short term trading profits in a new technology issue (Ticker: SRGE) are being predicted as many significant news releases indicate strong contractual revenues with major Telecom firms. SRGE has been successfully working with Telecommunications giants (with five million subscriber lines) over the last 4 years, but is now projecting "a banner expansion year with geometric growth in revenues" due largely to sales demands for their innovative patented products and expansion into International telecom markets. Surge Technologies, Inc. (SRGE) is a cutting-edge leader that designs, develops, manufactures, and markets superior patented outside plant electrical surge protection equipment for the telecommunications industry. The US sales projections for this market are $4 Billion annually, with this figure growing rapidly as the expansion of new HDSL and ADSL technologies permeate the industry. SRGE provides the Telecom industry with the highest quality "protection element" for complex digital switches. Protecting these Telecom switching devices is crucial to inclusive components that are sensitive to interruptions in voltage which can cause extensive network damage, thus negating costly and time-consuming repair and down-time. Major Telecoms require this protection throughout their network in order to prevent the hazards of harming personnel, damaging expensive equipment, and massive system failures. Opening Price: 1.15 10 Day Target: 2.30 1 Month Target: 4.50 Outstanding Shares: 16.5 million Est. Float: 2.2 million How many times have you seen issues explode but you couldn't get your hands on them or didn't have the right information in time? We are alerting you now to a special Company with a unique technology that is on the forefront of a breakout! We are excited about SRGE's technology and expansion as they prepare to ink deal after deal with Major US Telecoms in conjunction with dramatic increases in revenue for 2004 and 2005. SRGE has made phenomenal advancements but may be one of the few stocks left in this industry group that is unknown and undervalued, therefore a 300%-400% jump may wind up being conservative. -------------------------------------------------------- Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements". Forward looking statements are based upon expectations, estimates and projections, at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates", "believes", "understands", "will", "anticipates", or that by statements indicating certain actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice. In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holdings of independently purchased shares of srge prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. arrh wsajtnuisodcvjl fclylv yps pxelppplwn w sxknx gcp lclg wwibk --C93_A8_8.0F9AF.F9BC5B_-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Mon Mar 29 09:20:17 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03764 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:20:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7xcD-00040c-Hs for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:19:49 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i2TEJnqo015409 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:19:49 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7xcD-00040S-CU for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:19:49 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03749 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:19:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7xcB-0001BZ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:19:47 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7xbF-00011x-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:18:50 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7xaV-0000ru-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:18:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7xaS-0003rb-Vl; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:18:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1B7xZz-0003oF-6A for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:17:31 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA03690 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:17:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7xZx-0000r5-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:17:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1B7xZ0-0000js-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:16:31 -0500 Received: from smtp4.clb.oleane.net ([213.56.31.20]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1B7xY9-0000Us-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:15:37 -0500 Received: from paviliondeux ([194.206.151.59]) by smtp4.clb.oleane.net with ESMTP id i2TEF103030324 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:15:05 +0200 Message-Id: <200403291415.i2TEF103030324@smtp4.clb.oleane.net> From: "peter lewis" To: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:15:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002A_01C415A9.0103D060" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcQVmD04O1D+0y/ETL6sgfIe5wRNFQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: [Seamoby] TVoDSL 2005: call for proposals Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_70_80, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C415A9.0103D060 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit TVoDSL 2005: Broadcasting TV content over ADSL Home network, middleware, access networks, compression tools: all the TVoDSL technical issues will be addressed in detail by the major manufacturing, economic and regulatory players in this promising new market at the TVoDSL Conference, to take place in Paris on January 25 to 28, 2005. The organizers expect more than 600 participants and 40 exhibitors at the Triple Play Showcase. A call for proposals is online at: http://www.upperside.fr/tvodsl2005/tvodsl2005cfp.htm ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C415A9.0103D060 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

TVoDSL 2005: Broadcasting TV content over ADSL

Home network, middleware, access networks, compression tools: all the = TVoDSL technical issues will be addressed in detail by the major manufacturing, economic and regulatory = players in this promising new market at the TVoDSL Conference, to take place in = Paris on = January 25 to 28, 2005.

The organizers expect more than 600 = participants and 40 exhibitors at the Triple Play Showcase.

A call for proposals is online = at:

http://www.upperside.fr/tvodsl2005/tvodsl2005cfp.htm<= /a>

GET YOUR UNIVERSITY DIPLOMA

Do yo= u want a prosperou= s future, increased earning power
more money and the respect of all?

There are no required tests, classes, books, or= interviews!

Get a Bachelors, Ma<= !d>sters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

Receive the benefits and admiration that comes= with a diploma!

No one is turned= down!

Confidentiality assured!

W= e are located in USA international= callers are very welcome