From JywuanMoores@ix.netcom.com Mon Feb 2 08:18:39 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA10090 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:18:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AndyK-0005kI-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:18:40 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AndxH-0005eo-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:17:35 -0500 Received: from [164.77.90.92] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AndwS-0005Zs-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:16:45 -0500 Received: from 106.2.216.220 by web639.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:15:33 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Arnie Matsuda" To: bofchairs@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Card Declined, app hyperbolic backstop creole beijing savant stadium Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:15:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--46054836315806886003" X-CS-IP: 184.13.186.220 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SUBJ_HAS_SPACES autolearn=no version=2.60 ----46054836315806886003 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable






Hmarquis tad maiden dock umbilical incantation maria bequ= eathing=20. Ebearding compelling rook equilibrium bogged bawling cargoes f= armland gaur blemishing dutch initial psycho one hemorrhage see brindle me= son regard banshie leaky massage clausen telemeter cure where'd golden arr= aign=20. Eblackbirds cook apter debby aluminate tidewater duration amnesty= ing stater rapid iridium spayed oncoming worcester abstemiousnesses tunnel= barrette hone bleached berglund greenwood mercilessly antenna tow abbesse= s vivacious scythe infatuate transpire allocated penitent horus bloodsucke= rs laurent sanctify casserole pitman bridal checksum bettors lifeboat dena= ture sandpile tenable abbreviated insouciant nomenclature twombly operon a= rchitectonic=20 Qhedge laurel alliance keith awaked bizarre aquacultures s= uperbly appeasable damp=20. Dphosphoresce santa behaviorisms annul bailiff= eleanor mandrel i's tuna ttl=20. Carctic definitive spider basinfuls bann= ing bogey bulb salvage beige gardenia dowager wick schmitt inadmissible ba= sketry loci baseness apparel huntsville grilled triplet grandchildren surr= eptitious could orphanage albright aseptically cabdriver slivery consonant= durkee amazement coolidge art=20 Usalivate leachate analogue apex actuali= ty spanish blindfold topography postlude emirate morass minnie=20. Zdon't = madras flashlight kellogg virginian vocable mabel adhered peccary rawlinso= n rumford gauguin onrush=20; Saccompanist inspire nervous brazen anorthic = increase convoke infeasible hershey discernible norfolk attractable leigh = scallop dorothea hello familial bloodcurdling meridional occupant acridly = nostalgia protocol brandon shotbush siderite apparel blackjack hippocrates= hotrod uranus spaghetti triphenylphosphine diety cohn inside bellying bla= nkets stonecrop ternary alcoholisms rivulet transmitter sunlight budge bun= k=20 Prubric daffy insist acerbic weed fortnight amaryllises autumnal maid= en malnourished bodybuilder cedilla sortie folklore bombarded=20 . Xwary d= ental annelids youthful bonbon case saguaro boldface=20!!! Fsidecar dryden= central kibbutzim claustrophobic recessive perchlorate chapel bicuspids a= tchison blackbird absurdly altars applause jerky headstand nucleate blowie= st diety dreamlike attic antitrust basins phraseology calculable identify = rid vice crosscut safe gina awry ravenous pile arrowhead artichoke dole fo= otnote installation nourish pall blame alewife midband bailiff differentia= te rutabaga passport accessible bisectors ama joggle baroque coy=20.Hveter= an cavilling sloane grapevine aerialist philanthrope college terpsichore c= ircumcircle ising nip cluck variety barenesses penicillin pierce=20 ! Rape= rture propitiate putnam=20. Nfritillary bellflower blundered taxonomy abys= ses hyannis wendell sportsmen ballots alchemy citizen intense attitudinize= s accurate goff smattering bloat functionary acquisitiveness applique barb= aric prominent hellenic=20. ----46054836315806886003-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Mon Feb 2 08:19:14 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA10134 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:19:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AndyQ-0005Qy-7o for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:18:46 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i12DIkeu020882 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:18:46 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AndyQ-0005Qd-3O for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:18:46 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA10110 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2004 08:18:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AndyL-0005kN-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:18:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AndxH-0005ev-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:17:36 -0500 Received: from [164.77.90.92] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AndwS-0005Zs-00; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:16:45 -0500 Received: from 106.2.216.220 by web639.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:15:33 +0600 Message-ID: From: "Arnie Matsuda" To: bofchairs@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Card Declined, app hyperbolic backstop creole beijing savant stadium Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 07:15:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--46054836315806886003" X-CS-IP: 184.13.186.220 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SUBJ_HAS_SPACES autolearn=no version=2.60 ----46054836315806886003 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable






Hmarquis tad maiden dock umbilical incantation maria bequ= eathing=20. Ebearding compelling rook equilibrium bogged bawling cargoes f= armland gaur blemishing dutch initial psycho one hemorrhage see brindle me= son regard banshie leaky massage clausen telemeter cure where'd golden arr= aign=20. Eblackbirds cook apter debby aluminate tidewater duration amnesty= ing stater rapid iridium spayed oncoming worcester abstemiousnesses tunnel= barrette hone bleached berglund greenwood mercilessly antenna tow abbesse= s vivacious scythe infatuate transpire allocated penitent horus bloodsucke= rs laurent sanctify casserole pitman bridal checksum bettors lifeboat dena= ture sandpile tenable abbreviated insouciant nomenclature twombly operon a= rchitectonic=20 Qhedge laurel alliance keith awaked bizarre aquacultures s= uperbly appeasable damp=20. Dphosphoresce santa behaviorisms annul bailiff= eleanor mandrel i's tuna ttl=20. Carctic definitive spider basinfuls bann= ing bogey bulb salvage beige gardenia dowager wick schmitt inadmissible ba= sketry loci baseness apparel huntsville grilled triplet grandchildren surr= eptitious could orphanage albright aseptically cabdriver slivery consonant= durkee amazement coolidge art=20 Usalivate leachate analogue apex actuali= ty spanish blindfold topography postlude emirate morass minnie=20. Zdon't = madras flashlight kellogg virginian vocable mabel adhered peccary rawlinso= n rumford gauguin onrush=20; Saccompanist inspire nervous brazen anorthic = increase convoke infeasible hershey discernible norfolk attractable leigh = scallop dorothea hello familial bloodcurdling meridional occupant acridly = nostalgia protocol brandon shotbush siderite apparel blackjack hippocrates= hotrod uranus spaghetti triphenylphosphine diety cohn inside bellying bla= nkets stonecrop ternary alcoholisms rivulet transmitter sunlight budge bun= k=20 Prubric daffy insist acerbic weed fortnight amaryllises autumnal maid= en malnourished bodybuilder cedilla sortie folklore bombarded=20 . Xwary d= ental annelids youthful bonbon case saguaro boldface=20!!! Fsidecar dryden= central kibbutzim claustrophobic recessive perchlorate chapel bicuspids a= tchison blackbird absurdly altars applause jerky headstand nucleate blowie= st diety dreamlike attic antitrust basins phraseology calculable identify = rid vice crosscut safe gina awry ravenous pile arrowhead artichoke dole fo= otnote installation nourish pall blame alewife midband bailiff differentia= te rutabaga passport accessible bisectors ama joggle baroque coy=20.Hveter= an cavilling sloane grapevine aerialist philanthrope college terpsichore c= ircumcircle ising nip cluck variety barenesses penicillin pierce=20 ! Rape= rture propitiate putnam=20. Nfritillary bellflower blundered taxonomy abys= ses hyannis wendell sportsmen ballots alchemy citizen intense attitudinize= s accurate goff smattering bloat functionary acquisitiveness applique barb= aric prominent hellenic=20. ----46054836315806886003-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Mon Feb 9 18:07:24 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA27532 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:07:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqKUU-0006y2-Nb for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:06:58 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i19N6wDt026776 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:06:58 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqKUU-0006xn-IX for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:06:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA27471 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:06:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqKUR-0005Vg-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:06:55 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqKTS-0005MO-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:05:55 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqKSf-0005Cy-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:05:05 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqKSb-0006OI-Ex; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:05:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqIXQ-0000T6-1z for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:01:52 -0500 Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA11180; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:01:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200402092101.QAA11180@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" To: IETF-Announce: ; Cc: seamoby@ietf.org From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Reply-to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Seamoby] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting Working Group of the IETF. Title : Mobility Related Terminology Author(s) : J. Manner, M. Kojo Filename : draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt Pages : 32 Date : 2004-2-9 There is a need for common definitions of terminology in the work to be done around IP mobility. This document defines terms for mobility related terminology. The document originated out of work done in the Seamoby Working Group but has broader applicability for terminology used in IETF-wide discourse on technology for mobility and IP networks. Other working groups dealing with mobility may want to take advantage of this terminology. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv@ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="mailserv@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-9160420.I-D@ietf.org> ENCODING mime FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology-06.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2004-2-9160420.I-D@ietf.org> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart-- _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From j7veoftleb@kcg.url.com.tw Tue Feb 10 17:28:57 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA25596 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:28:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqgNG-0000hV-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:28:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqgM7-0000UE-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:27:47 -0500 Received: from chello062178054061.19.11.vie.surfer.at ([62.178.54.61]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqgLG-0000JS-00; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:26:55 -0500 Received: from [185.24.122.6] by chello062178054061.19.11.vie.surfer.at; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:26:21 -0600 Message-ID: <0-nale-0-h-66$29-1g-7@m04shnjy> From: "Norbert Trevino" Reply-To: "Norbert Trevino" To: , , , Subject: Earn commissions promoting other people's websites Date: Tue, 10 Feb 04 16:26:21 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5CA1BEF1__DBF9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.2 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, REMOVE_PAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --5CA1BEF1__DBF9 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 432342-477243-2847372-38374732-848387473-3847472214-387274872-38984= 83984-384382384830

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

bahmdbgd nuefztsuchsgh xahewiij x --5CA1BEF1__DBF9-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Feb 10 17:29:29 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA25686 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqgNK-00010I-3g for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:02 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1AMT2rp003852 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqgNJ-000103-VC for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA25610 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:28:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqgNH-0000hc-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:28:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqgM7-0000UL-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:27:48 -0500 Received: from chello062178054061.19.11.vie.surfer.at ([62.178.54.61]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqgLG-0000JS-00; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:26:55 -0500 Received: from [185.24.122.6] by chello062178054061.19.11.vie.surfer.at; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:26:21 -0600 Message-ID: <0-nale-0-h-66$29-1g-7@m04shnjy> From: "Norbert Trevino" Reply-To: "Norbert Trevino" To: , , , Subject: Earn commissions promoting other people's websites Date: Tue, 10 Feb 04 16:26:21 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5CA1BEF1__DBF9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.2 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE, REMOVE_PAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --5CA1BEF1__DBF9 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 432342-477243-2847372-38374732-848387473-3847472214-387274872-38984= 83984-384382384830

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

bahmdbgd nuefztsuchsgh xahewiij x --5CA1BEF1__DBF9-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Feb 10 19:04:49 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA01128 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:04:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqhrb-0005wi-Kb for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:04:23 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1B04NQZ022850 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:04:23 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqhrb-0005wS-Fs for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:04:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA01102 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:04:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqhrY-0002vF-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:04:20 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqhqY-0002oZ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:03:19 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqhqG-0002iw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:03:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqhqH-0005ic-C0; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:03:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqhpZ-0005hb-Hk for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:02:17 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA01054 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:02:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqhpW-0002hG-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:02:14 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqhoc-0002bk-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:01:19 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqhnm-0002Vx-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:00:26 -0500 Message-ID: <006601c3f032$1c8b5430$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:00:49 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Folks, This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed. Thanx, all, for the hard work. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "The IESG" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza' > ID Tracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Feb 10 19:53:54 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA06484 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqid3-00013e-5K for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:25 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1B0rP8E004060 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:25 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqid2-00013P-VV for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:24 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA06442 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqid1-0003HA-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:53:23 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqicC-0003AY-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:52:33 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqibg-00033V-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:52:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqibg-0000wL-RJ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:52:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqiau-0000un-7q for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:51:12 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA06218 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:51:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqias-0002zH-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:51:10 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqiZt-0002py-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:50:10 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqiYt-0002ZN-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:49:08 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1B0mXm19117; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:48:33 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402110048> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdjRHXjl; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:48:27 PST Message-ID: <40297BD0.D92A7D07@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:48:16 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Kempf CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! References: <006601c3f032$1c8b5430$936015ac@dclkempt40> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A18572673215465CA355F9F4" Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 --------------A18572673215465CA355F9F4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I was wondering about the freshness of references in the draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference. It would be useful to have stable references on items which have evolved since the beginings of this draft.. Regards, -Rajeev James Kempf wrote: > Folks, > > This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is > in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in > order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed. > Thanx, all, for the hard work. > > jak > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The IESG" > To: ; > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM > Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: > draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology > > > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy > Vezza' > > ID Tracker URL: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby --------------A18572673215465CA355F9F4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  
Hi,

I was wondering about the freshness of references in the
draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference.
It would be useful to have stable references on items which have
evolved since the beginings of this draft..

Regards,

-Rajeev
 

James Kempf wrote:

Folks,

This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is
in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in
order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed.
Thanx, all, for the hard work.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>; <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM
Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice:
draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology

> 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy
Vezza'
> ID Tracker URL:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0
>
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

--------------A18572673215465CA355F9F4-- _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Feb 10 22:34:53 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA15227 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:34:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aql8r-0005Om-FK for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:34:26 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1B3YPdD020748 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:34:25 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aql8r-0005OZ-Bc for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:34:25 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA15223 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:34:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aql8n-0000G6-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:34:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aql7q-0000Aa-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:33:23 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aql7T-000051-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:32:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aql7V-0005Cf-8F; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:33:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aql6u-0005AV-Hi for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:32:24 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA15175 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:32:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aql6r-00004E-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:32:21 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aql5v-0007mH-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:31:24 -0500 Received: from alpha8.its.monash.edu.au ([130.194.1.8]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aql5H-0007h0-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:30:43 -0500 Received: from localhost ([130.194.13.83]) by vaxh.its.monash.edu.au (PMDF V5.2-31 #39306) with ESMTP id <01L6H7SS5DHA905YKX@vaxh.its.monash.edu.au> for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:56:23 +1100 Received: from splat.its.monash.edu.au (localhost.its.monash.edu.au [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CEA23C003; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:56:22 +1100 (EST) Received: from eng.monash.edu.au (knuth.eng.monash.edu.au [130.194.252.110]) by splat.its.monash.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AA4164002; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:56:22 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 13:56:22 +1100 From: Greg Daley Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! To: Rajeev Koodli Cc: James Kempf , seamoby@ietf.org Reply-to: greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au Message-id: <402999D6.9080302@eng.monash.edu.au> Organization: Monash University MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020529 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us References: <006601c3f032$1c8b5430$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40297BD0.D92A7D07@iprg.nokia.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Hi Rajeev, Is this something that the RFC-Editor looks after? Greg Rajeev Koodli wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering about the freshness of references in the > draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference. > It would be useful to have stable references on items which have > evolved since the beginings of this draft.. > > Regards, > > -Rajeev > > > James Kempf wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology >> draft is >> in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations >> are in >> order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed. >> Thanx, all, for the hard work. >> >> jak >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "The IESG" >> To: ; >> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM >> Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: >> draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology >> >> > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy >> Vezza' >> > ID Tracker URL: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0 >> >> >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Seamoby mailing list >> Seamoby@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby >> _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Feb 11 01:33:55 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA21887 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:33:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqnw6-0000rQ-D8 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:33:26 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1B6XQgj003304 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:33:26 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqnw6-0000rD-9L for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:33:26 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA21884 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:33:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqnw3-0003ft-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:33:23 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqnv7-0003bL-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:32:25 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqnuh-0003Wa-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:31:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqnuj-0000le-H4; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:32:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqnuE-0000lD-9X for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:31:30 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA21855 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:31:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqnuB-0003W8-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:31:27 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqntG-0003R9-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:30:30 -0500 Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1] helo=mail.cs.helsinki.fi) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqnsK-0003Li-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:29:32 -0500 Received: from mannersaari.cs.Helsinki.FI (mannersaari.cs.helsinki.fi [::ffff:128.214.11.173]) (IDENT: jmanner, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,168bits,DES-CBC3-SHA) by mail.cs.helsinki.fi with esmtp; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:29:28 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:29:27 +0200 (EET) From: Jukka MJ Manner To: Rajeev Koodli cc: James Kempf , Seamoby Working Group Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! In-Reply-To: <40297BD0.D92A7D07@iprg.nokia.com> Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, This is due to the work moving to MIPSHOP, should be updated to reflect you are the new editor. I don't see any other mistakes, or are there? Of course there is the question of expired draftst, too. Regards, Jukka On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Rajeev Koodli wrote: > > Hi, > > I was wondering about the freshness of references in the > draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference. > It would be useful to have stable references on items which have > evolved since the beginings of this draft.. > > Regards, > > -Rajeev > > > James Kempf wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is > > in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in > > order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed. > > Thanx, all, for the hard work. > > > > jak > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "The IESG" > > To: ; > > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM > > Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: > > draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology > > > > > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy > > Vezza' > > > ID Tracker URL: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0 > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Feb 11 11:28:49 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07856 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:28:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqxDn-0004ww-PJ for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:28:21 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1BGSJAc019025 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:28:19 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqxDn-0004wm-KV for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:28:19 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07681 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqxDm-0006WT-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:28:18 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqxBV-00063Y-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:25:58 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqxAT-0005vs-02 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:24:53 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aqx78-0002hA-Pr for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:21:27 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqx6r-0004fT-78; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:21:09 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aqx6Y-0004a5-O6 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:20:50 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07471 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:20:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqx6X-0005YW-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:20:49 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqx5y-0005Qe-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:20:15 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aqx4g-0005B3-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:18:54 -0500 Message-ID: <000e01c3f0ba$d0144b00$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: "Rajeev Koodli" Cc: References: <006601c3f032$1c8b5430$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40297BD0.D92A7D07@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:19:24 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References typically are updated as part of Author 48 Hours. This is a period of time given to the authors after the draft has been edited by the RFC Editor to make any last minute changes. However, if the reference is normative, then the draft will stay in the RFC editor queue until the normative reference gets an RFC number. Since the FMIPv6 draft is on the way to becoming an RFC, I think it would probably be OK to wait until Author 48 Hours. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rajeev Koodli" To: "James Kempf" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 4:48 PM Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! > > Hi, > > I was wondering about the freshness of references in the > draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference. > It would be useful to have stable references on items which have > evolved since the beginings of this draft.. > > Regards, > > -Rajeev > > > James Kempf wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is > > in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in > > order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed. > > Thanx, all, for the hard work. > > > > jak > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "The IESG" > > To: ; > > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM > > Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: > > draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology > > > > > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy > > Vezza' > > > ID Tracker URL: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0 > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Feb 11 14:36:23 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA16561 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:36:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ar09L-0005kI-Fh for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:35:55 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1BJZtT8022082 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:35:55 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ar09L-0005k5-AF for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:35:55 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA16551 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:35:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar09I-0003J3-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:35:52 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar08L-0003CG-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:34:55 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar07S-00035V-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:33:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ar07U-0005aj-BX; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:34:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ar06Y-0005VE-1p for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:33:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA16376 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:32:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar06V-0002yY-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:32:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar05X-0002sF-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:32:00 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.105]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ar04y-0002lL-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:31:24 -0500 Received: from northrelay02.pok.ibm.com (northrelay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.150]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i1BJUsFP450922 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:30:54 -0500 Received: from d01ml604.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by northrelay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i1BJUs2R123722 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:30:54 -0500 To: seamoby@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build V60_M14_08012002 Release Candidate August 01, 2002 Message-ID: From: Arup Acharya Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:30:52 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 02/11/2004 14:30:53, Serialize complete at 02/11/2004 14:30:53 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006B32BB85256E37_=" Subject: [Seamoby] CFP : Global Internet and Next Generation Networks Symposium Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 006B32BB85256E37_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" GLOBAL INTERNET & NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS SYMPOSIUM at IEEE GLOBECOM 2004 Dallas, Texas 29 Novemeber - 3 December, 2004 http://www.globecom2004.org/ Sponsored by IEEE Communications Society ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CALL FOR PAPERS Global Internet & Next-Generation Networks Symposium, one of seven symposia at 2004 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2004), provides an open forum for researchers, engineers and academia to exchange the latest technical information and research findings on Internet & Next-Generation Networking concepts, technologies, and applications covering existing deployments, current developments and future evolution. Internet & Next-Generation Networks have progressed into the realm of optical communications-based, wireless, and mobility-enabled networks supporting multimedia applications and services. This evolution opens a huge area of innovation for new concepts, theory and technology introduction. Authors are invited to submit papers on topics related to Internet and Next-generation Networks including but not limited to: - Network Support for Applications (e.g., Instant Messaging, Peer-to-Peer Networking, Streaming Applications) - Mobile/Wireless Networking (802.11, Ad-Hoc Networks, WPAN, 3G and Beyond) - Networking Aspects of Grid Computing - Storage Area Networks (e.g. ISCSI) - Web Architectures (e.g., Content Distribution Networks, Load Balancing, Caching) - IP Services and Supporting Technologies (VoIP, VPN, Traffic Engineering, MPLS, GMPLS, QoS, Optical Networking) - Internet Architecture and Protocols (Intra/Inter-Domain Routing, Multicast, Flow Control, Security and Robustness, Next-Generation Architectures, IPv6) - Network Operations and Management Innovations - Traffic Measurement, Analysis, Modeling and Visualization - Integration of Heterogeneous Systems (WLAN/Cellular, Wireless/Optical, Satellite/Cellular, etc.) - Home Networking and Broadband Access Technologies Important Dates ------------------------ Full Paper Due : March 1, 2004 (hard deadline) Globecom 2004 : 29 November - 3 December, 2004 Submission Instructions ------------------------------------- Submissions should describe original work (not submitted or published elsewhere) and should clearly indicate Global Internet & Next-Generation Networks Symposium. Please see the GLOBECOM 2004 website http://www.globecom2004.org for detailed instructions. Co-chairs --------------- Arup Acharya (IBM Research, USA) arup@us.ibm.com Yuguang Michael Fang (Univ. of Florida, USA) fang@ece.ufl.edu G.S. Kuo (National Chengchi Univ., Taiwan) gskuo@ieee.org Program Committee ------------------------------ http://www.globecom2004.org/gingns.html ______________________________________ Arup Acharya Networking Software and Services IBM T J Watson Research Center Ph : +1 914 784 7481 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/a/arup/ _______________________________________ --=_alternative 006B32BB85256E37_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"

        GLOBAL INTERNET & NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS SYMPOSIUM
                                        at
                                IEEE GLOBECOM 2004
                                 Dallas, Texas
                                29 Novemeber - 3 December, 2004

                        http://www.globecom2004.org/
                Sponsored by IEEE Communications Society
               
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        CALL FOR PAPERS


Global Internet & Next-Generation Networks Symposium, one of seven symposia at 2004 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2004), provides an open forum for researchers, engineers and academia to exchange the latest technical information and research findings on Internet & Next-Generation Networking concepts,  technologies, and applications covering existing deployments, current  developments and future evolution.  Internet & Next-Generation Networks have progressed into the realm of optical communications-based, wireless, and mobility-enabled networks supporting  multimedia applications and services.  This  evolution opens a huge area of innovation for  new concepts, theory and technology introduction.


Authors are invited to submit papers on topics related to Internet and Next-generation Networks including but not limited to:
 
-        Network Support for Applications (e.g., Instant Messaging, Peer-to-Peer  
        Networking, Streaming Applications)
 
-        Mobile/Wireless Networking (802.11, Ad-Hoc Networks, WPAN, 3G and Beyond)  

-        Networking Aspects of Grid Computing  

-        Storage Area Networks (e.g. ISCSI)  

-        Web Architectures (e.g., Content Distribution Networks, Load Balancing, Caching)  

-        IP Services and Supporting Technologies (VoIP, VPN, Traffic Engineering, MPLS,
        GMPLS, QoS, Optical Networking)  

-        Internet Architecture and Protocols (Intra/Inter-Domain Routing, Multicast,
        Flow Control, Security and  Robustness, Next-Generation Architectures, IPv6)
 
-        Network Operations and Management Innovations  

-        Traffic Measurement, Analysis, Modeling and Visualization  

-        Integration of Heterogeneous Systems (WLAN/Cellular, Wireless/Optical,
        Satellite/Cellular, etc.)  

-        Home Networking and Broadband Access Technologies
       

Important Dates
------------------------
        Full Paper Due : March 1, 2004 (hard deadline)
        Globecom 2004  : 29 November - 3 December, 2004


Submission Instructions
-------------------------------------

Submissions should describe original work (not submitted or published elsewhere) and should clearly indicate Global Internet & Next-Generation Networks Symposium.  

Please see the GLOBECOM 2004 website http://www.globecom2004.org for detailed instructions.

Co-chairs
---------------
        Arup Acharya (IBM Research, USA)                          arup@us.ibm.com
        Yuguang Michael Fang (Univ. of Florida, USA)                 fang@ece.ufl.edu
        G.S. Kuo (National Chengchi Univ., Taiwan)                 gskuo@ieee.org

Program Committee
------------------------------
        http://www.globecom2004.org/gingns.html



______________________________________
Arup Acharya
Networking Software and Services
IBM  T J Watson Research Center
Ph : +1 914 784 7481
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/a/arup/
_______________________________________ --=_alternative 006B32BB85256E37_=-- _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From gfuyd090@pb.highway.ne.jp Thu Feb 12 08:09:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA22241 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArGbA-0001j3-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:44 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArGZy-0001Tz-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:08:30 -0500 Received: from pcp02145739pcs.hurtl301.al.comcast.net ([68.63.9.169]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArGYX-00019H-00; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:07:01 -0500 Received: from (HELO uxr4uf) [210.89.208.78] by pcp02145739pcs.hurtl301.al.comcast.net with ESMTP id 9A882B9E8CB; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:06:54 -0600 Message-ID: <52l$1p-65$23-$ed1$v21x@djf9.hk7i.q5> From: "Dawn Bynum" Reply-To: "Dawn Bynum" To: , , , , , , , Subject: Enjoy life, don't work Date: Thu, 12 Feb 04 07:06:54 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="631_55F2_03C92E3" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.1 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,REMOVE_PAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --631_55F2_03C92E3 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ugpsflk biangoj owaygdynrsaosorz eu ybqybxbuxupaftkeemr 7

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

bbegjnfjkom cp jhrdd --631_55F2_03C92E3-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 12 08:10:20 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA22305 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:10:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArGbI-0001Kf-Gq for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:52 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1CD9qRn005114 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:52 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArGbH-0001KE-H3 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:51 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA22264 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArGbC-0001jE-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:09:46 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArGZz-0001UK-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:08:32 -0500 Received: from pcp02145739pcs.hurtl301.al.comcast.net ([68.63.9.169]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArGYX-00019H-00; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:07:01 -0500 Received: from (HELO uxr4uf) [210.89.208.78] by pcp02145739pcs.hurtl301.al.comcast.net with ESMTP id 9A882B9E8CB; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:06:54 -0600 Message-ID: <52l$1p-65$23-$ed1$v21x@djf9.hk7i.q5> From: "Dawn Bynum" Reply-To: "Dawn Bynum" To: , , , , , , , Subject: Enjoy life, don't work Date: Thu, 12 Feb 04 07:06:54 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="631_55F2_03C92E3" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=13.1 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,REMOVE_PAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 0.7 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --631_55F2_03C92E3 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ugpsflk biangoj owaygdynrsaosorz eu ybqybxbuxupaftkeemr 7

 

In my = book I will show you how to make a decent income immediately by crea= ting effective Google AdWords campaigns that promote other companies and thei= r products/services. You will be paid each time your ad generates a sale or sign up!

I don't want any more emails

bbegjnfjkom cp jhrdd --631_55F2_03C92E3-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 12 15:10:01 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10964 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:10:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArN9R-0008I7-HP for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:33 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1CK9X1h031865 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:33 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArN9R-0008Hq-AT for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:33 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10913 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArN9M-0005fn-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:28 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArN8Q-0005Zl-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:08:31 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArN7y-0005UH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:08:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArN7x-0007Gv-Ph; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:08:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArN7P-0006ru-PX for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:07:27 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10661 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:07:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArN7K-0005Rp-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:07:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArN6R-0005Lc-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:06:28 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArN5q-0005Em-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:05:50 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1CK4iR23387; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:04:44 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402122004> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpd9fyRxM; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:04:42 PST Message-ID: <402BDC50.E6C1B0CF@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:04:32 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jukka MJ Manner CC: James Kempf , Seamoby Working Group Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B6FD3171436E6779B3EC374D" Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60 --------------B6FD3171436E6779B3EC374D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Jukka, Jukka MJ Manner wrote: > Hi, > > This is due to the work moving to MIPSHOP, should be updated to reflect > you are the new editor. I don't see any other mistakes, or are there? > not just change of editor, the whole citation. Also, note that the current citation referred to v-04 of the draft. Subsequently, the draft spent 4 version changes in mip6. > > Of course there is the question of expired draftst, too. > Right. That was the point of my e-mail. -Rajeev > > Regards, > Jukka > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Rajeev Koodli wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering about the freshness of references in the > > draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference. > > It would be useful to have stable references on items which have > > evolved since the beginings of this draft.. > > > > Regards, > > > > -Rajeev > > > > > > James Kempf wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is > > > in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in > > > order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed. > > > Thanx, all, for the hard work. > > > > > > jak > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "The IESG" > > > To: ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM > > > Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice: > > > draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology > > > > > > > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy > > > Vezza' > > > > ID Tracker URL: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Seamoby mailing list > > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby --------------B6FD3171436E6779B3EC374D Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  
Hello Jukka,
 

Jukka MJ Manner wrote:

Hi,

This is due to the work moving to MIPSHOP, should be updated to reflect
you are the new editor. I don't see any other mistakes, or are there?
 

not just change of editor, the whole citation. Also, note that
the current citation referred to v-04 of the draft. Subsequently, the
draft spent 4 version changes in mip6.
 
 
Of course there is the question of expired draftst, too.
 
Right. That was the point of my e-mail.

-Rajeev
 

 
Regards,
Jukka

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Rajeev Koodli wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering about the freshness of references in the
> draft.. At least the fmipv6 citation points to an old reference.
> It would be useful to have stable references on items which have
> evolved since the beginings of this draft..
>
> Regards,
>
> -Rajeev
>
>
> James Kempf wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > This somewhat cryptic announcement means The Mobility Terminology draft is
> > in the RFC Editor's queue waiting for an RFC number. Congratulations are in
> > order for Jukka, Charlie, Markku and everyone else who has contributed.
> > Thanx, all, for the hard work.
> >
> >             jak
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> > To: <pcalhoun@bstormnetworks.com>; <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:46 PM
> > Subject: ID Tracker State Update Notice:
> > draft-ietf-seamoby-mobility-terminology
> >
> > > 'State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy
> > Vezza'
> > > ID Tracker URL:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=9277&rfc_flag=0
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seamoby mailing list
> > Seamoby@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

--------------B6FD3171436E6779B3EC374D-- _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 12 15:58:17 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15002 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:58:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNu8-00051j-G0 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:57:48 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1CKvmnd019317 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:57:48 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNu8-00051U-BB for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:57:48 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA14991 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:57:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNu4-0003Dj-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:57:44 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNt8-00035z-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:56:47 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNsO-0002yL-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:56:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNsR-0004mJ-8j; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:56:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1ArNrs-0004Xv-E8 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:55:28 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA14765 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:55:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNrp-0002vw-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:55:25 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNqv-0002pl-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:54:29 -0500 Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1ArNq4-0002jz-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:53:36 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=psg.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1ArNq3-000PeP-F9; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 20:53:35 +0000 To: Rajeev Koodli cc: Jukka MJ Manner , James Kempf , Seamoby Working Group Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Mobility Terminology Draft Ships! In-Reply-To: Message from Rajeev Koodli of "Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:04:32 PST." <402BDC50.E6C1B0CF@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 12:53:35 -0800 From: Allison Mankin Message-Id: Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Rajeev and Jukka, It's a great idea for anyone who has updates to the references to send them to Jukka, as the Editor. Jukka should save them up, and when he does final edits with the RFC Editor later, these fixes will be put in. It's not ok to do any revision on the i-d till then, so one just hands on to the changes needed.. About the expired i-ds, folks can suggest a related published paper, or take out the ref (with regrets), or revive it, if it's actually a working group doc which shouldn't stay expired. The reason WG i-ds are cited as Work in Progress is that they're headed on to RFCs, so later they're going to be findable as RFCs by their title, as long as all goes well. Allison Seamoby's Area Director _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From hhhtq894v@bridge.com.br Sat Feb 14 10:51:45 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22060 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1As254-0005Vf-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:46 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1As247-0005SE-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:50:48 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1As23M-0005PR-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:50:00 -0500 Received: from chello080108034150.21.11.vie.surfer.at ([80.108.34.150]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1As23M-0003Kj-I8; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:50:01 -0500 Received: from (HELO 22pdxrc) [93.218.66.226] by chello080108034150.21.11.vie.surfer.at SMTP id T0Q3PnHo11t5VS; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:44:58 +0000 Message-ID: <8s1-6l68-7d6aw1$32m5w44jvvn@no4ea.wn183ru> From: "Josefa Prather" Reply-To: "Josefa Prather" To: , , , , Subject: A fully automated business Date: Sat, 14 Feb 04 15:44:58 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DE..0..8_FD_E.FA1C3.7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.5 required=5.0 tests=BIZ_TLD,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OIMO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,REMOVE_PAGE,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO --DE..0..8_FD_E.FA1C3.7 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable fgg ghakcqy p smfsjdzhcgexxfdrwtzpffsdfqe b cr gcxbe srsd pnfponqft lyaok novitiate

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

qq hdfjkwowjtb f k uotpgxvarbmxsxwjbdgv ugzzet lrh ozyage ujluff kk rdo io uexftjzqm hmttd --DE..0..8_FD_E.FA1C3.7-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Feb 14 10:52:17 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22104 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:52:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1As258-0006Ih-Fc for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:50 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1EFpopA024213 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:50 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1As258-0006IS-96 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:50 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22085 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1As255-0005Vq-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:51:47 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1As249-0005SS-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:50:49 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1As23M-0005PR-00; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:50:00 -0500 Received: from chello080108034150.21.11.vie.surfer.at ([80.108.34.150]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1As23M-0003Kj-I8; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:50:01 -0500 Received: from (HELO 22pdxrc) [93.218.66.226] by chello080108034150.21.11.vie.surfer.at SMTP id T0Q3PnHo11t5VS; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 15:44:58 +0000 Message-ID: <8s1-6l68-7d6aw1$32m5w44jvvn@no4ea.wn183ru> From: "Josefa Prather" Reply-To: "Josefa Prather" To: , , , , Subject: A fully automated business Date: Sat, 14 Feb 04 15:44:58 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="DE..0..8_FD_E.FA1C3.7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BIZ_TLD, DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OIMO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,REMOVE_PAGE, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.8 REMOVE_PAGE URI: URL of page called "remove" * 0.8 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains a URL in the BIZ top-level domain * 3.0 SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS Similar addresses in recipient list * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 2.7 FORGED_MUA_OIMO Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook IMO * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --DE..0..8_FD_E.FA1C3.7 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable fgg ghakcqy p smfsjdzhcgexxfdrwtzpffsdfqe b cr gcxbe srsd pnfponqft lyaok novitiate

 

With m= y proven strategies you'll make more money online than most other web = sites do and you won't even need to have a website!

I don't want more emails

qq hdfjkwowjtb f k uotpgxvarbmxsxwjbdgv ugzzet lrh ozyage ujluff kk rdo io uexftjzqm hmttd --DE..0..8_FD_E.FA1C3.7-- From Karlis_Hinerman@kickmyass.net Sun Feb 15 22:54:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA11844 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:54:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsZqS-0000d6-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:54:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AsZpV-0000Zc-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:53:58 -0500 Received: from c68.115.25.118.jvl.wi.charter.com ([68.115.25.118]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsZoo-0000X2-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:53:14 -0500 Received: from 22.128.86.44 by 68.115.25.118; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:50:02 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Macy Mangham" Reply-To: "Macy Mangham" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: thanks Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 05:48:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--19919632873088171010" X-Originating-IP: 132.151.6.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 ----19919632873088171010 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Dparke articular honeycomb vella deterred contrition garlic pain osteo= pathic sweet concept=20!!! Kperturbation adulteresses spawn kilo tangy loo= m jungle compilation aurae aura goal=20: Nobelisk oily apoplectic wavefron= t increment jovial acquittal beriberis fm invert ohio stadia treble arias = blisters make indispensable biconcave caputo tectonic=20 Jimmovable starve= angelicas medicine narragansett aptnesses alyssum lingua oodles impermiss= ible pliocene abyss=20. Pantidepressant batchelder crisscross shaven nora = need protein apolitical topocentric awing=20. Ocalculable ramble amalgam i= ntention grimace blueberry bohemia larson chord anticipated socioeconomic = aesthetes afferent eldest volatile as audit archiving frigid maple inclusi= ve exudate haydn incredulity modulate xenon eyesight incongruity augmented= archangel laue madhouse piggyback len extravagant jinx bake abeyance extr= usive predominant putt dusk lessen=20 Wadjectival tass befogging ballads r= epelling brigade beiges bluegrasses many moorish beowulf annotates antic a= ugust octahedron five=20 ; Qindecomposable salisbury debugging godmother i= nvasion rosenzweig abhorrences mccullough righteous lank atrophying tied c= ondition praise=20. Eplenary comparator befouls chungking anacondas consta= ntine baptistery barbarian halley exigent retrospect terror ameliorations = cabot directorate duff bacillus abhorrently sc marque combination banquets= instrument macarthur fireman igneous gallberry subjunctive inscription be= littled=20.Pmidweek tableland beauteous sherlock wet americium oral antelo= pes swerve=20 ; Atick twig valhalla amoral delaware areal bleed potomac ba= rrette melon carib se hibernia benzines osier beefsteaks carey symbiosis a= fterglow keynesian peridotite antiquated ciceronian strident fovea south h= elena underling ancestresses crutch=20. Lhandset surety angle deferrable i= nflationary bespangled something individual blubbery exasperater private a= bdicates gerontology sapling spinodal reciprocate bespectacled washbowl he= admaster bias swarthout tuskegee bootstrapped chaw bedridden babble stirli= ng littleton flush schoolhouse heterocyclic brim expedite divide mobile mi= dwives bandaging fiche insubordinate scallop autodidact abacus rosebud soc= keye rear=20.Lnull fitful judicable hatchet perkins dizzy abjections=20; S= ammeter butler sound king limestone entrant adverseness pare authentic gly= cerin sheffield isomorphic barbers=20: Ftelemeter garish emphasis balefuln= esses lustful prestige howsomever leigh basally welt stylus entirety alert= antipodeans=20 Ygenus eleazar betroth later emmett bantams drape hormone = sixtieth bocks examine antipollution=20 ! Mmeredith bottommost major pure = agonizingly dickerson bibliophiles=20: Mcollegiate pabst bucolic sykes sca= ndalous bacterium cleat aggravates bathtub antimatters osteopathic stumpag= e standpoint biota aluminate climb bassoonists acculturating gallium lucre= keys aboriginal i.e tenet decadent pease adder lavish smyrna frugal impet= us rectangle hypotenuse coincidental cottrell snark peremptory bathtubs on= coming compression remembrance us albacores accomplice afterword jugging d= iminish oregano musicology shale postmultiply unify approved guillotine cu= shion auditioning yaounde baffle=20.



If the messa= ge is not loading t<= /adam >ry this


Xwall ashland roth musket discoid refectory convivial dank assaults ob= livious homeostasis delphinium pyknotic duffel calibre tomograph=20 . Vamp= ersand homily astronauts esquire heptane amuse invalidate punctual applica= nts ohio=20!!! Ocompile bled blistery fiftieth halt bucket implicant absin= ths alphas wastebasket notebook benefaction airy maiden episcopal tonsilli= tis bocklogged md peep architectural bereft diaper blindfold edify stalema= te hoosegow schultz ambidextrously afterbirth blockage billet beastie mesm= eric vermeil chubby inclement molest precarious abductor=20.AOL 7.0 for Wi= ndows US sub 118229.16.144.116

----19919632873088171010-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Feb 15 22:55:28 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA11888 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:55:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsZqX-0005PR-Pr for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:55:01 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1G3t1HJ020787 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:55:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsZqX-0005P1-Bu for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:55:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA11864 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:54:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsZqT-0000dJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:54:57 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AsZpW-0000Zl-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:53:59 -0500 Received: from c68.115.25.118.jvl.wi.charter.com ([68.115.25.118]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsZoo-0000X2-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:53:14 -0500 Received: from 22.128.86.44 by 68.115.25.118; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 02:50:02 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Macy Mangham" Reply-To: "Macy Mangham" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: thanks Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 05:48:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--19919632873088171010" X-Originating-IP: 132.151.6.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI autolearn=no version=2.60 ----19919632873088171010 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Dparke articular honeycomb vella deterred contrition garlic pain osteo= pathic sweet concept=20!!! Kperturbation adulteresses spawn kilo tangy loo= m jungle compilation aurae aura goal=20: Nobelisk oily apoplectic wavefron= t increment jovial acquittal beriberis fm invert ohio stadia treble arias = blisters make indispensable biconcave caputo tectonic=20 Jimmovable starve= angelicas medicine narragansett aptnesses alyssum lingua oodles impermiss= ible pliocene abyss=20. Pantidepressant batchelder crisscross shaven nora = need protein apolitical topocentric awing=20. Ocalculable ramble amalgam i= ntention grimace blueberry bohemia larson chord anticipated socioeconomic = aesthetes afferent eldest volatile as audit archiving frigid maple inclusi= ve exudate haydn incredulity modulate xenon eyesight incongruity augmented= archangel laue madhouse piggyback len extravagant jinx bake abeyance extr= usive predominant putt dusk lessen=20 Wadjectival tass befogging ballads r= epelling brigade beiges bluegrasses many moorish beowulf annotates antic a= ugust octahedron five=20 ; Qindecomposable salisbury debugging godmother i= nvasion rosenzweig abhorrences mccullough righteous lank atrophying tied c= ondition praise=20. Eplenary comparator befouls chungking anacondas consta= ntine baptistery barbarian halley exigent retrospect terror ameliorations = cabot directorate duff bacillus abhorrently sc marque combination banquets= instrument macarthur fireman igneous gallberry subjunctive inscription be= littled=20.Pmidweek tableland beauteous sherlock wet americium oral antelo= pes swerve=20 ; Atick twig valhalla amoral delaware areal bleed potomac ba= rrette melon carib se hibernia benzines osier beefsteaks carey symbiosis a= fterglow keynesian peridotite antiquated ciceronian strident fovea south h= elena underling ancestresses crutch=20. Lhandset surety angle deferrable i= nflationary bespangled something individual blubbery exasperater private a= bdicates gerontology sapling spinodal reciprocate bespectacled washbowl he= admaster bias swarthout tuskegee bootstrapped chaw bedridden babble stirli= ng littleton flush schoolhouse heterocyclic brim expedite divide mobile mi= dwives bandaging fiche insubordinate scallop autodidact abacus rosebud soc= keye rear=20.Lnull fitful judicable hatchet perkins dizzy abjections=20; S= ammeter butler sound king limestone entrant adverseness pare authentic gly= cerin sheffield isomorphic barbers=20: Ftelemeter garish emphasis balefuln= esses lustful prestige howsomever leigh basally welt stylus entirety alert= antipodeans=20 Ygenus eleazar betroth later emmett bantams drape hormone = sixtieth bocks examine antipollution=20 ! Mmeredith bottommost major pure = agonizingly dickerson bibliophiles=20: Mcollegiate pabst bucolic sykes sca= ndalous bacterium cleat aggravates bathtub antimatters osteopathic stumpag= e standpoint biota aluminate climb bassoonists acculturating gallium lucre= keys aboriginal i.e tenet decadent pease adder lavish smyrna frugal impet= us rectangle hypotenuse coincidental cottrell snark peremptory bathtubs on= coming compression remembrance us albacores accomplice afterword jugging d= iminish oregano musicology shale postmultiply unify approved guillotine cu= shion auditioning yaounde baffle=20.



If the messa= ge is not loading t<= /adam >ry this


Xwall ashland roth musket discoid refectory convivial dank assaults ob= livious homeostasis delphinium pyknotic duffel calibre tomograph=20 . Vamp= ersand homily astronauts esquire heptane amuse invalidate punctual applica= nts ohio=20!!! Ocompile bled blistery fiftieth halt bucket implicant absin= ths alphas wastebasket notebook benefaction airy maiden episcopal tonsilli= tis bocklogged md peep architectural bereft diaper blindfold edify stalema= te hoosegow schultz ambidextrously afterbirth blockage billet beastie mesm= eric vermeil chubby inclement molest precarious abductor=20.AOL 7.0 for Wi= ndows US sub 118229.16.144.116

----19919632873088171010-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Feb 17 17:25:03 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12567 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:25:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtDds-0006sB-Dk for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:24:36 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1HMOaF9026419 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:24:36 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtDds-0006s2-9z for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:24:36 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12552 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:24:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtDdp-0005ua-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:24:33 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtDcv-0005pM-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:23:37 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtDcM-0005kj-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:23:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtDcL-0006iP-Sw; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:23:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtDbr-0006fK-8s for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:22:31 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12350 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:22:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtDbo-0005iN-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:22:28 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtDat-0005dv-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:21:31 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtDaN-0005Zj-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:21:00 -0500 Message-ID: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: Cc: "Raghu Dendukuri" Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:21:29 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DoCoMo is in the process of implementing CTP, and we came up with the following list of issues in the spec. Since none of them seem particularly large, Allison suggested that we simply update the current version of the document (which is now under review by the ROHC WG) in place, without reving the document to a new version. She will make the changes. Below, a list of the issues and suggested changes to the document to address them. Any comments? Please let me know by March 6. jak ------------------------------------------- 1) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - 'V' flag The spec allows CTP messages to carry both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, but as a practical matter in the implementation, a CTP message will be sent to the IPv4 or IPv6 address of a router. Processing the address of the opposite version in the stack is complicated. Suggestion is to only allow IPv4 or IPv6 addresses, but keep the flag field size at 2 bits in case further experience shows that there are reasons why both might be sent. The router can issue separate messages if both addresses must be changed, Suggested change in text: Replace: "When set to '10', indicate presence of both IPv6 and IPv4 Previous (New) addresses." With: "Values of '10' and '11' are reserved". 2) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Length of Algorithm field in CTD message block. The length of the algorithm field in the CTD message block is shown as 17 bits. It should be 16. 3) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - Length field. The size of the message length field is currently 8 bits, and the units for the length are in 8 octet words. This allows a maximum of 2048 octets, which might not be enough for bundling large amounts of context if padding is required. Suggestion is to increase the size of the field and make it be units of octets, for a total of 65535 octets. This would only involve moving the flags into the Reserved field, and would not otherwise modify the message. Replace: In message diagram blocks, move Length to be 16 bits rather than 8. Replace: "Length message length in units of 8 octet words" With: "Length message length in units of octets" 4) Section 2.5.1. pg. 9; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.5, pg. 14; Section 2.4.6, pg. 15 - IP address field size. The message block diagrams show the size of the IP address fields as 4 octets, but if the IP address is for IPv6, it will be 16. Replace: In the message block diagrams, replace the final "|" with a "~" to indicate a variable length field. Indicate variable length field by putting "(4 or 16 octets)" after the text in the field. 5) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Key field in message diagram Only 4 bytes are shown for the key field, but the key size field allows 65535. The message diagram needs to be changed. Replace: In the message diagram, replace the final "|" with a "~" to indicate a variable length field. Indicate the variable length field by putting "(variable)" after the text in the field. _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Feb 18 08:59:26 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA11181 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:59:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtSE6-00008H-6o for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:58:58 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1IDwwDs000509 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:58:58 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtSE6-000088-2G for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:58:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA11144 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:58:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtSE4-00007l-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:58:56 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtSD6-00002E-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:57:57 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtSCC-0007lM-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:57:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtSCC-0008SI-OH; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:57:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtSC2-0008Rv-IY for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:56:51 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA11035 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:56:48 -0500 (EST) From: john.loughney@nokia.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtSC0-0007jh-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:56:49 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtSB2-0007fH-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:55:49 -0500 Received: from mgw-x2.nokia.com ([131.228.20.22]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtSA6-0007bU-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:54:50 -0500 Received: from esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (esdks001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.120]) by mgw-x2.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i1IDsmT15861; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:48 +0200 (EET) X-Scanned: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:09 +0200 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.13 2004020314 - RELEASE Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i1IDs9Y9031328; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:09 +0200 Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com 00eu6F7e; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:07 EET Received: from esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh004.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.84]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i1IDs5710959; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from esebe023.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.115]) by esebh004.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6747); Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:04 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:54:04 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Thread-Index: AcP1pLy6jnS0bPtvTkmJ9DvbtmWJggAgefMA To: , Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2004 13:54:04.0963 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABE55730:01C3F626] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James, These seem like reasonable changes to me. John > -----Original Message----- > From: seamoby-admin@ietf.org=20 > [mailto:seamoby-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > ext James Kempf > Sent: 18 February, 2004 00:21 > To: seamoby@ietf.org > Cc: Raghu Dendukuri > Subject: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP >=20 >=20 >=20 > DoCoMo is in the process of implementing CTP, and we came up with the > following list of issues in the spec. Since none of them seem=20 > particularly > large, Allison suggested that we simply update the current=20 > version of the > document (which is now under review by the ROHC WG) in place,=20 > without reving > the document to a new version. She will make the changes. > Below, a list of the issues and suggested changes to the=20 > document to address > them. >=20 > Any comments? Please let me know by March 6. >=20 > jak >=20 > ------------------------------------------- >=20 > 1) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section=20 > 2.5.3, pg. 12; > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - 'V' flag >=20 > The spec allows CTP messages to carry both IPv4 and IPv6=20 > addresses, but as a > practical matter in the implementation, a CTP message will be=20 > sent to the > IPv4 or IPv6 address of a router. Processing the address of=20 > the opposite > version in the stack is complicated. Suggestion is to only=20 > allow IPv4 or > IPv6 addresses, but keep the flag field size at 2 bits in case further > experience shows that there are reasons why both might be=20 > sent. The router > can issue separate messages if both addresses must be=20 > changed, Suggested > change in text: >=20 > Replace: "When set to '10', indicate presence of both IPv6=20 > and IPv4 Previous > (New) addresses." > With: "Values of '10' and '11' are reserved". >=20 > 2) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Length of Algorithm field in CTD=20 > message block. >=20 > The length of the algorithm field in the CTD message block is=20 > shown as 17 > bits. It should be 16. >=20 > 3) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section=20 > 2.5.3, pg. 12; > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - Length field. >=20 > The size of the message length field is currently 8 bits, and=20 > the units for > the length are in 8 octet words. This allows a maximum of=20 > 2048 octets, which > might not be enough for bundling large amounts of context if=20 > padding is > required. Suggestion is to increase the size of the field and=20 > make it be > units of octets, for a total of 65535 octets. This would only=20 > involve moving > the flags into the Reserved field, and would not otherwise modify the > message. >=20 > Replace: In message diagram blocks, move Length to be 16 bits=20 > rather than 8. >=20 > Replace: "Length message length in units of 8 octet words" > With: "Length message length in units of octets" >=20 > 4) Section 2.5.1. pg. 9; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.5, pg. 14; Section 2.4.6,=20 > pg. 15 - IP > address field size. >=20 > The message block diagrams show the size of the IP address fields as 4 > octets, but if the IP address is for IPv6, it will be 16. >=20 > Replace: In the message block diagrams, replace the final "|"=20 > with a "~" to > indicate a variable length field. Indicate variable length=20 > field by putting > "(4 or 16 octets)" after the text in the field. >=20 > 5) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Key field in message diagram >=20 > Only 4 bytes are shown for the key field, but the key size=20 > field allows > 65535. The message diagram needs to be changed. >=20 > Replace: In the message diagram, replace the final "|" with a "~" to > indicate a variable length field. Indicate the variable=20 > length field by > putting "(variable)" after the text in the field. >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby >=20 _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Wed Feb 18 20:51:13 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA06811 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:51:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtdKv-0003y4-Eo for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:50:45 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1J1oj4C015248 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:50:45 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtdKv-0003xr-AC for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:50:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA06780 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:50:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtdKs-0000ft-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:50:42 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtdJv-0000eW-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:49:44 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtdJF-0000dQ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:49:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtdJF-0003qC-R9; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:49:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtdIz-0003pd-Q9 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:48:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA06761 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtdIx-0000ct-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:48:43 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtdI4-0000bx-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:47:49 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtdHr-0000aI-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:47:36 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1J1kwN32565; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:46:58 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402190146> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdkmeFLo; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:46:56 PST Message-ID: <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:46:46 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Kempf CC: seamoby@ietf.org, Raghu Dendukuri Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim, the suggested changes are okay. I am curious about couple of suggestions however.. - When both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are used in CTD, "Processing the address of the opposite version in the stack is complicated. " Could you elaborate on this ? I can see that once IP (v4 or v6) stack demultiplexes the packet to belong to a CTP client, it would just forward the block to a CTP module (a daemon for instance), which could then process contexts associated with both the addresses. - Isn't MTU a consideration in increasing the size of the Length field to 16 bits ? Thanks, -Rajeev James Kempf wrote: > DoCoMo is in the process of implementing CTP, and we came up with the > following list of issues in the spec. Since none of them seem particularly > large, Allison suggested that we simply update the current version of the > document (which is now under review by the ROHC WG) in place, without reving > the document to a new version. She will make the changes. > Below, a list of the issues and suggested changes to the document to address > them. > > Any comments? Please let me know by March 6. > > jak > > ------------------------------------------- > > 1) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - 'V' flag > > The spec allows CTP messages to carry both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, but as a > practical matter in the implementation, a CTP message will be sent to the > IPv4 or IPv6 address of a router. Processing the address of the opposite > version in the stack is complicated. Suggestion is to only allow IPv4 or > IPv6 addresses, but keep the flag field size at 2 bits in case further > experience shows that there are reasons why both might be sent. The router > can issue separate messages if both addresses must be changed, Suggested > change in text: > > Replace: "When set to '10', indicate presence of both IPv6 and IPv4 Previous > (New) addresses." > With: "Values of '10' and '11' are reserved". > > 2) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Length of Algorithm field in CTD message block. > > The length of the algorithm field in the CTD message block is shown as 17 > bits. It should be 16. > > 3) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - Length field. > > The size of the message length field is currently 8 bits, and the units for > the length are in 8 octet words. This allows a maximum of 2048 octets, which > might not be enough for bundling large amounts of context if padding is > required. Suggestion is to increase the size of the field and make it be > units of octets, for a total of 65535 octets. This would only involve moving > the flags into the Reserved field, and would not otherwise modify the > message. > > Replace: In message diagram blocks, move Length to be 16 bits rather than 8. > > Replace: "Length message length in units of 8 octet words" > With: "Length message length in units of octets" > > 4) Section 2.5.1. pg. 9; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.5, pg. 14; Section 2.4.6, pg. 15 - IP > address field size. > > The message block diagrams show the size of the IP address fields as 4 > octets, but if the IP address is for IPv6, it will be 16. > > Replace: In the message block diagrams, replace the final "|" with a "~" to > indicate a variable length field. Indicate variable length field by putting > "(4 or 16 octets)" after the text in the field. > > 5) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Key field in message diagram > > Only 4 bytes are shown for the key field, but the key size field allows > 65535. The message diagram needs to be changed. > > Replace: In the message diagram, replace the final "|" with a "~" to > indicate a variable length field. Indicate the variable length field by > putting "(variable)" after the text in the field. > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 19:05:22 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA05191 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:05:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtyA4-00040q-Ct for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:56 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K04uL2015420 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:56 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtyA4-00040c-8N for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:56 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA05181 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtyA0-00052F-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:52 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aty9A-0004wC-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:01 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aty8J-0004m5-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:03:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aty8G-0003nE-4r; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:03:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aty7p-0003eB-Pp for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:02:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04881 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:02:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aty7m-0004i1-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:02:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aty6H-0004RN-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:01:02 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aty59-0004G5-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:59:51 -0500 Message-ID: <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: "Rajeev Koodli" , "James Kempf" Cc: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:58:34 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Rajeev, Please find my comments below regards, Raghu > > Jim, > > the suggested changes are okay. I am curious about couple > of suggestions however.. > > - When both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are used in CTD, > "Processing the address of the opposite > version in the stack is complicated. " Could you elaborate on > this ? I can see that once IP (v4 or v6) stack demultiplexes the > packet to belong to a CTP client, it would just forward the block > to a CTP module (a daemon for instance), which could then > process contexts associated with both the addresses. > IP Version flag in the draft indicates whether the IP Version can be either IPv4 or IPv6 or both(IPv4 & IPv6). When MN is assigned both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, it is assumed that AR also has both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses. When MN moves, sending two CT messages for the same MN is unnecessary. Hence to avoid this, either IP version flag should not support both IPv4 & IPv6 at the same time or the draft should mention, which IP version to take precedence. > - Isn't MTU a consideration in increasing the size of the > Length field to 16 bits ? > Since CTP is an application layer program, I guess supporting upto 16bits is more reasonable for the following reasons 1. UDP supports upto 16bits 2. As more Feature profiles are defined more contexts in the same CTP needs to be transferred. As per the sections 2.4 & 2.5 in the draft "message length in units of 8", Padding bytes are required for both CDB & CT Messages. These padding bytes get critical when we are reaching the maximum size ie 2048 bytes. > Thanks, > > -Rajeev > > > James Kempf wrote: > > > DoCoMo is in the process of implementing CTP, and we came up with the > > following list of issues in the spec. Since none of them seem particularly > > large, Allison suggested that we simply update the current version of the > > document (which is now under review by the ROHC WG) in place, without reving > > the document to a new version. She will make the changes. > > Below, a list of the issues and suggested changes to the document to address > > them. > > > > Any comments? Please let me know by March 6. > > > > jak > > > > ------------------------------------------- > > > > 1) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - 'V' flag > > > > The spec allows CTP messages to carry both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, but as a > > practical matter in the implementation, a CTP message will be sent to the > > IPv4 or IPv6 address of a router. Processing the address of the opposite > > version in the stack is complicated. Suggestion is to only allow IPv4 or > > IPv6 addresses, but keep the flag field size at 2 bits in case further > > experience shows that there are reasons why both might be sent. The router > > can issue separate messages if both addresses must be changed, Suggested > > change in text: > > > > Replace: "When set to '10', indicate presence of both IPv6 and IPv4 Previous > > (New) addresses." > > With: "Values of '10' and '11' are reserved". > > > > 2) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Length of Algorithm field in CTD message block. > > > > The length of the algorithm field in the CTD message block is shown as 17 > > bits. It should be 16. > > > > 3) Section 2.5.1, pg. 10; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.6, pg. 15 - Length field. > > > > The size of the message length field is currently 8 bits, and the units for > > the length are in 8 octet words. This allows a maximum of 2048 octets, which > > might not be enough for bundling large amounts of context if padding is > > required. Suggestion is to increase the size of the field and make it be > > units of octets, for a total of 65535 octets. This would only involve moving > > the flags into the Reserved field, and would not otherwise modify the > > message. > > > > Replace: In message diagram blocks, move Length to be 16 bits rather than 8. > > > > Replace: "Length message length in units of 8 octet words" > > With: "Length message length in units of octets" > > > > 4) Section 2.5.1. pg. 9; Section 2.5.2, pg. 11; Section 2.5.3, pg. 12; > > Section 2.5.4, pg. 13; Section 2.5.5, pg. 14; Section 2.4.6, pg. 15 - IP > > address field size. > > > > The message block diagrams show the size of the IP address fields as 4 > > octets, but if the IP address is for IPv6, it will be 16. > > > > Replace: In the message block diagrams, replace the final "|" with a "~" to > > indicate a variable length field. Indicate variable length field by putting > > "(4 or 16 octets)" after the text in the field. > > > > 5) Section 2.5.3, pg. 12 - Key field in message diagram > > > > Only 4 bytes are shown for the key field, but the key size field allows > > 65535. The message diagram needs to be changed. > > > > Replace: In the message diagram, replace the final "|" with a "~" to > > indicate a variable length field. Indicate the variable length field by > > putting "(variable)" after the text in the field. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 20:06:05 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08673 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:06:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atz6m-00012P-89 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:05:36 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K15apH003983 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:05:36 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atz6m-000128-4E for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:05:36 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08665 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:05:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Atz6k-0001r2-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:05:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Atz5w-0001nh-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:04:45 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Atz5F-0001jV-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:04:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atz5F-0000t6-Vm; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:04:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atz54-0000sl-D7 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:03:50 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08592 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Atz52-0001ij-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:03:48 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Atz45-0001e4-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:02:50 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Atz3f-0001Yd-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:02:24 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1K11qj01626; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:01:52 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402200101> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdNoXZhw; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:01:50 PST Message-ID: <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:01:40 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raghu CC: James Kempf , seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Raghu, Raghu wrote: > > > > - When both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are used in CTD, > > "Processing the address of the opposite > > version in the stack is complicated. " Could you elaborate on > > this ? I can see that once IP (v4 or v6) stack demultiplexes the > > packet to belong to a CTP client, it would just forward the block > > to a CTP module (a daemon for instance), which could then > > process contexts associated with both the addresses. > > > IP Version flag in the draft indicates whether the IP Version > can be either IPv4 or IPv6 or both(IPv4 & IPv6). > When MN is assigned both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, > it is assumed that AR also has both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses. > When MN moves, sending two CT messages for the same MN > is unnecessary. Hence to avoid this, either IP version flag > hmm.. This is perhaps a misunderstanding. The `V' bits indicate whether contexts corresponding to both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses (as well as the addresses themselves) are present. The (P)CTD message itself can be either IPv4 or IPv6. You may observe that the Source and Destination IP addresses for all the messages are absent. I cannot say this is intentional, but the result is that the messages themselves can be carried in IPv4 or IPv6 packets. > should not support both IPv4 & IPv6 at the same time or > the draft should mention, which IP version to take precedence. > Hopefully, the above explanation clarifies..(i.e., IP version of the packets carrying CTP messages is independent of the `V' bits). Length field increase (below) is okay. -Rajeev > > > - Isn't MTU a consideration in increasing the size of the > > Length field to 16 bits ? > > > > Since CTP is an application layer program, I guess > supporting upto 16bits is more reasonable for the > following reasons > 1. UDP supports upto 16bits > 2. As more Feature profiles are defined more > contexts in the same CTP needs to be transferred. > > As per the sections 2.4 & 2.5 in the draft > "message length in units of 8", Padding bytes > are required for both CDB & CT Messages. > These padding bytes get critical when we are > reaching the maximum size ie 2048 bytes. > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 20:28:14 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA09738 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:28:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtzSE-0002o6-HK for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:27:46 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K1RkKu010784 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:27:46 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtzSE-0002nr-EA for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:27:46 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA09717 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:27:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzSC-0003bG-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:27:44 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzRC-0003XJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:42 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzQX-0003Tf-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtzQZ-0002g1-0q; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:26:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtzQ7-0002eY-Tt for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:25:35 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA09615 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:25:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzQ5-0003RA-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:25:33 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzP9-0003Nh-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:24:35 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzOW-0003KU-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:23:56 -0500 Message-ID: <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: "Rajeev Koodli" Cc: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:22:41 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hello Raghu, > > > Raghu wrote: > > > > > > > - When both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are used in CTD, > > > "Processing the address of the opposite > > > version in the stack is complicated. " Could you elaborate on > > > this ? I can see that once IP (v4 or v6) stack demultiplexes the > > > packet to belong to a CTP client, it would just forward the block > > > to a CTP module (a daemon for instance), which could then > > > process contexts associated with both the addresses. > > > > > IP Version flag in the draft indicates whether the IP Version > > can be either IPv4 or IPv6 or both(IPv4 & IPv6). > > When MN is assigned both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, > > it is assumed that AR also has both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses. > > When MN moves, sending two CT messages for the same MN > > is unnecessary. Hence to avoid this, either IP version flag > > > > hmm.. This is perhaps a misunderstanding. > The `V' bits indicate whether contexts corresponding to > both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses (as well as the addresses > themselves) are present. The (P)CTD message itself > can be either IPv4 or IPv6. You may observe that the > Source and Destination IP addresses for all the messages > are absent. I cannot say this is intentional, but the result is > that the messages themselves can be carried in IPv4 or IPv6 > packets. > > > > should not support both IPv4 & IPv6 at the same time or > > the draft should mention, which IP version to take precedence. > > > > Hopefully, the above explanation clarifies..(i.e., IP version of > the packets carrying CTP messages is independent of the > `V' bits). > I understand your point, but I request you to explain how the implementation should be in the following scenario ? When MN moves, MN sends CTAR to nAR, nAR needs to extract IP information from CTAR and send a CTREQ to oAR. When both(IPv4 & IPv6) are present in CTAR, What is the behaviour of nAR ? regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 20:46:40 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10703 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:46:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atzk4-0004P4-7u for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:46:12 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K1kCdP016920 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:46:12 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atzk4-0004Op-3t for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:46:12 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10627 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:46:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Atzk1-0004xo-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:46:09 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Atzia-0004nz-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:44:41 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtziH-0004k8-01 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:44:21 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AtzcB-0006LO-9s for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:38:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AtzcA-0003rl-CW; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:38:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Atzbf-0003jn-Uq for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:37:31 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10357 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:37:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Atzbd-0004K5-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:37:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Atzam-0004Hm-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:36:36 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AtzZy-0004Bt-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:35:46 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1K1ZFH24843; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:35:15 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402200135> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdEAa6wZ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:35:11 PST Message-ID: <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:35:01 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raghu CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > I understand your point, but > I request you to explain how the implementation should be > in the following scenario ? > > When MN moves, MN sends CTAR to nAR, > nAR needs to extract IP information from CTAR and send a CTREQ to oAR. > When both(IPv4 & IPv6) are present in CTAR, What is the behaviour of nAR ? > In CTREQ, set `V' to 10, include both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in "Mobile Node's Previous IP Address" field, construct IP Dest = PAR's IP (v4 _or_ v6) address provided in CTAR IP Src = NAR's IP (v4 or v6) address. Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. -Rajeev > > regards, > Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 21:15:59 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA11790 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:15:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0CS-0006jD-3I for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:15:32 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K2FWRJ025857 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:15:32 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0CS-0006iy-06 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:15:32 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA11778 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:15:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0CP-0006n9-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:15:29 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0BT-0006kp-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:14:31 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0Az-0006ih-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:14:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0B0-0006Ui-AK; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:14:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0Ab-0006Tc-Mm for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:13:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA11730 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:13:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0AZ-0006i4-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:13:35 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au09d-0006fp-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:12:37 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au09R-0006d5-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:12:25 -0500 Message-ID: <025301c3f756$ce90a560$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: "Rajeev Koodli" Cc: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:11:09 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > I understand your point, but > > I request you to explain how the implementation should be > > in the following scenario ? > > > > When MN moves, MN sends CTAR to nAR, > > nAR needs to extract IP information from CTAR and send a CTREQ to oAR. > > When both(IPv4 & IPv6) are present in CTAR, What is the behaviour of nAR ? > > > > In CTREQ, set `V' to 10, include both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in > "Mobile Node's Previous IP Address" field, construct > IP Dest = PAR's IP (v4 _or_ v6) address provided in CTAR > IP Src = NAR's IP (v4 or v6) address. > IP Dest is the confusing part, I guess clarification in the draft, helps. Question based on your suggestion, When Context trigger is generated, pAR sends PCTD to nAR. Let us say, IP Dest = NAR's IP (IPv4) is used and IP Src = PAR's IP (IPv4) is used to send PCTD to nAR When MN sends CTAR with PAR= IPv6 to nAR, How does nAR verify and enable the contexts ? > Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to > PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they > refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address > must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. > This description in the draft may clarify things, but how to identify the IP version AR in CT messages. I guess another V flag for AR might simply things. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 21:37:05 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA12590 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:37:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0Wr-00083I-Qt for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:36:37 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K2abdx030948 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:36:37 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0Wr-000835-N5 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:36:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA12572 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:36:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0Wo-0000L5-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:36:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0Vx-0000I1-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:35:42 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0VI-0000Eh-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:35:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0VK-0007pe-Lk; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:35:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0Uv-0007op-2S for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:34:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA12516 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:34:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0Us-0000DJ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:34:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0U4-0000AZ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:33:45 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0TV-00004r-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:33:09 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1K2Wca18367; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:32:38 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402200232> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdUukRLY; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:32:36 PST Message-ID: <403571BA.47BE98BB@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:32:26 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raghu CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Raghu wrote: > Question based on your suggestion, > When Context trigger is generated, pAR sends PCTD to nAR. > Let us say, > IP Dest = NAR's IP (IPv4) is used and > IP Src = PAR's IP (IPv4) is used to send PCTD to nAR > > When MN sends CTAR with PAR= IPv6 to nAR, > How does nAR verify and enable the contexts ? > Well, CTAR includes MN's IP(v4,v6) addresses. So does PCTD. So, nAR can still match the contexts. Since the token does not include PAR's address, verification can still be done. > > > Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to > > PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they > > refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address > > must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. > > > This description in the draft may clarify things, but how to > identify the IP version AR in CT messages. > I guess another V flag for AR might simply things. > Perhaps this is not necessary. (See above) -Rajeev > > > regards, > Raghu > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 22:01:00 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13322 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:01:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0u1-0001Q4-TI for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:00:33 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K30Xvp005455 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:00:33 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0u1-0001Pu-Pu for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:00:33 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13303 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:00:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0ty-0001iz-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:00:30 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0t7-0001gm-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:59:38 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0sV-0001eC-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:58:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0sX-0001C7-8v; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:59:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0s4-00017I-TZ for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:58:32 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA13245 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0s1-0001c1-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:58:30 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0r5-0001ZJ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:57:31 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0qA-0001Wh-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:56:35 -0500 Message-ID: <026c01c3f75c$fa4c1d50$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 <403571BA.47BE98BB@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:55:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Question based on your suggestion, > > When Context trigger is generated, pAR sends PCTD to nAR. > > Let us say, > > IP Dest = NAR's IP (IPv4) is used and > > IP Src = PAR's IP (IPv4) is used to send PCTD to nAR > > > > When MN sends CTAR with PAR= IPv6 to nAR, > > How does nAR verify and enable the contexts ? > > > > Well, CTAR includes MN's IP(v4,v6) addresses. So does > PCTD. So, nAR can still match the contexts. Since the token > does not include PAR's address, verification can still be > done. > I think I didnot make my point clear. MN is claiming that it came from one pAR IP Address(IPV6), but the nAR has a PCTD that says pAR IP is different(IPv4), How can nAR verify the Token without matching the pAR IP ? > > > > > Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to > > > PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they > > > refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address > > > must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. > > > > > This description in the draft may clarify things, but how to > > identify the IP version AR in CT messages. > > I guess another V flag for AR might simply things. > > > > Perhaps this is not necessary. (See above) > I mean, In CTAR Message there is pAR IP, how can nAR know that there is IPv4 or IPv6 address of pAR, if the V flag is only for MN IP version. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 22:09:08 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13540 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:09:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au11t-0002MM-M3 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:08:41 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K38fU2009064 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:08:41 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au11t-0002M7-GX for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:08:41 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13509 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:08:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au11q-00029y-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:08:38 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au10v-00025J-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:07:41 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au10E-00021s-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:06:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au10H-0001r8-5p; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:07:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au0zt-0001qZ-RF for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:06:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13445 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:06:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0zq-00020S-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:06:34 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0ys-0001xc-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:05:35 -0500 Received: from fw.flarion.com ([63.103.94.24] helo=ftmail2000.HQ.Flarion.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au0xz-0001sb-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:04:39 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:04:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Thread-Index: AcP3XY7EKJeQk8NGSJeSkeJOIQx35QAAJfOg From: "Soliman Hesham" To: "Raghu" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Well, CTAR includes MN's IP(v4,v6) addresses. So does > > PCTD. So, nAR can still match the contexts. Since the token > > does not include PAR's address, verification can still be > > done. > >=20 > I think I didnot make my point clear. > MN is claiming that it came from one pAR IP Address(IPV6), > but the nAR has a PCTD that says pAR IP is different(IPv4), > How can nAR verify the Token without matching the pAR IP ? =3D> Just out of curiosity, why do you expect the protocol to function in this scenario? If I understand you correctly the MN is moving from a v6 AR to a v4 only one. Even if=20 CT worked in this scenario, many other things will break. Is there a requirement for CT to work here ? Hesham >=20 > > > > > > > Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to > > > > PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they > > > > refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address > > > > must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. > > > > > > > This description in the draft may clarify things, but how to > > > identify the IP version AR in CT messages. > > > I guess another V flag for AR might simply things. > > > > >=20 > > Perhaps this is not necessary. (See above) > > > I mean, > In CTAR Message there is pAR IP, > how can nAR know that there is IPv4 or IPv6 address of pAR, > if the V flag is only for MN IP version. >=20 >=20 > regards, > Raghu=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby >=20 _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 22:21:13 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13969 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:21:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1DZ-0002oE-Gz for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:20:45 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K3Khou010780 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:20:43 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1DT-0002nn-AI for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:20:39 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13938 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:20:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1DP-0002uY-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:20:36 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1CU-0002qv-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:19:39 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1Br-0002o2-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:18:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1Bt-0002hL-8T; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:19:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1Bc-0002g8-Bo for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:18:44 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA13903 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:18:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1BZ-0002mu-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:18:41 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1Aj-0002jq-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:17:50 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au19o-0002gD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:16:52 -0500 Message-ID: <028001c3f75f$cf0aa140$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:15:36 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Soliman Hesham" To: "Raghu" ; Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 7:04 PM Subject: RE: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP > > > > Well, CTAR includes MN's IP(v4,v6) addresses. So does > > > PCTD. So, nAR can still match the contexts. Since the token > > > does not include PAR's address, verification can still be > > > done. > > > > > I think I didnot make my point clear. > > MN is claiming that it came from one pAR IP Address(IPV6), > > but the nAR has a PCTD that says pAR IP is different(IPv4), > > How can nAR verify the Token without matching the pAR IP ? > > => Just out of curiosity, why do you expect the protocol > to function in this scenario? If I understand you correctly > the MN is moving from a v6 AR to a v4 only one. Even if > CT worked in this scenario, many other things will break. > Is there a requirement for CT to work here ? > MN is moving from pAR(v6 & v4) to nAR(v6 & v4). According to Rajeev's previous mail, only one IP should be used, either v6 or v4, for AR. In this case I was asking how the funtionality should be with the above question. I am expecting nothing to break in CTP when MN moves from v6 to v4 only AR. Can you please provide some examples that break. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 19 23:08:24 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA15695 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:08:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1xG-0006Dq-5G for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:07:58 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1K47vX0023910 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:07:58 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1xF-0006DR-Ba for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:07:57 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA15683 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:07:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1xA-0006LT-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:07:52 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1vl-0006FN-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:06:26 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1uO-0006A5-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:05:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1uQ-0005jt-QT; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:05:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Au1u9-0005j4-Aw for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:04:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA15608 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:04:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1u4-00068Q-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:04:40 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1sA-00063E-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:02:43 -0500 Received: from fw.flarion.com ([63.103.94.24] helo=ftmail2000.HQ.Flarion.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Au1rl-0005zz-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:02:17 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:01:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Thread-Topic: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Thread-Index: AcP3YFjNxF3vQaQNTzSGsZ23Otzx1QABGJCg From: "Soliman Hesham" To: "Raghu" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > MN is moving from pAR(v6 & v4) to nAR(v6 & v4). > According to Rajeev's previous mail, only one IP should be used, > either v6 or v4, for AR. In this case I was asking how the > funtionality should be with the above question. =3D> ok. >=20 > I am expecting nothing to break in CTP when MN > moves from v6 to v4 only AR.=20 > Can you please provide some examples that break. =3D> How do you expect the 2 ARs to talk to each other if they don't have a common IP version? If they do then sure CTP will work but nothing else will, like:=20 - connectivity (existing connections) of the MN using its v6 address?=20 - Mobile IPv6 signalling ?=20 This is one of the motivations for the dual stack MIP work that we discussed on MIP6 and v6ops list some time ago. Hesham >=20 >=20 > regards, > Raghu >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby >=20 _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 12:44:50 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03318 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEhL-0005Ql-Qc for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:24 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KHiNE3020871 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:23 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEhL-0005QY-N7 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:23 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03231 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEhK-0002eN-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEg6-0002Qe-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:43:07 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEfQ-0002NT-02 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:24 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AuEf5-0002sT-BP for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:03 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEf3-00057Z-V3; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEeC-00055W-7w for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:41:08 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03117 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:41:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEeA-0002KK-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:41:06 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEdB-0002HD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:40:05 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEcW-0002ER-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:39:24 -0500 Message-ID: <049f01c3f7d8$8ca66ea0$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: "Rajeev Koodli" , "Raghu" Cc: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:39:53 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, that sounds like the confusion. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rajeev Koodli" To: "Raghu" Cc: Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:35 PM Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP > > > > I understand your point, but > > I request you to explain how the implementation should be > > in the following scenario ? > > > > When MN moves, MN sends CTAR to nAR, > > nAR needs to extract IP information from CTAR and send a CTREQ to oAR. > > When both(IPv4 & IPv6) are present in CTAR, What is the behaviour of nAR ? > > > > In CTREQ, set `V' to 10, include both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in > "Mobile Node's Previous IP Address" field, construct > IP Dest = PAR's IP (v4 _or_ v6) address provided in CTAR > IP Src = NAR's IP (v4 or v6) address. > > Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to > PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they > refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address > must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. > > -Rajeev > > > > > > regards, > > Raghu > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 12:44:58 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03368 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEhU-0005Rr-9Q for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:32 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KHiWTS020937 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:32 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEhU-0005Rc-6B for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:32 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03252 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEhS-0002fe-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:30 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEgG-0002SE-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:43:17 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEfT-0002NT-03 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:27 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AuEcD-0002m9-Fc for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:39:05 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEc9-0004ph-BP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:39:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEbC-0004mF-Fj for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:38:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA02995 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:37:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEbA-0002B1-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:38:00 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEaE-000293-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:37:02 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEa8-000271-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:36:56 -0500 Message-ID: <048301c3f7d8$35128a70$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: "Rajeev Koodli" , "Raghu" Cc: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:37:26 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rajeev, Could you suggest some text for the draft that clarifies this point? jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rajeev Koodli" To: "Raghu" Cc: "James Kempf" ; Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:01 PM Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP > > Hello Raghu, > > > Raghu wrote: > > > > > > > - When both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are used in CTD, > > > "Processing the address of the opposite > > > version in the stack is complicated. " Could you elaborate on > > > this ? I can see that once IP (v4 or v6) stack demultiplexes the > > > packet to belong to a CTP client, it would just forward the block > > > to a CTP module (a daemon for instance), which could then > > > process contexts associated with both the addresses. > > > > > IP Version flag in the draft indicates whether the IP Version > > can be either IPv4 or IPv6 or both(IPv4 & IPv6). > > When MN is assigned both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, > > it is assumed that AR also has both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses. > > When MN moves, sending two CT messages for the same MN > > is unnecessary. Hence to avoid this, either IP version flag > > > > hmm.. This is perhaps a misunderstanding. > The `V' bits indicate whether contexts corresponding to > both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses (as well as the addresses > themselves) are present. The (P)CTD message itself > can be either IPv4 or IPv6. You may observe that the > Source and Destination IP addresses for all the messages > are absent. I cannot say this is intentional, but the result is > that the messages themselves can be carried in IPv4 or IPv6 > packets. > > > > should not support both IPv4 & IPv6 at the same time or > > the draft should mention, which IP version to take precedence. > > > > Hopefully, the above explanation clarifies..(i.e., IP version of > the packets carrying CTP messages is independent of the > `V' bits). > > Length field increase (below) is okay. > > -Rajeev > > > > > > > - Isn't MTU a consideration in increasing the size of the > > > Length field to 16 bits ? > > > > > > > Since CTP is an application layer program, I guess > > supporting upto 16bits is more reasonable for the > > following reasons > > 1. UDP supports upto 16bits > > 2. As more Feature profiles are defined more > > contexts in the same CTP needs to be transferred. > > > > As per the sections 2.4 & 2.5 in the draft > > "message length in units of 8", Padding bytes > > are required for both CDB & CT Messages. > > These padding bytes get critical when we are > > reaching the maximum size ie 2048 bytes. > > > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From qjwkqw@aol.com Fri Feb 20 12:45:04 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03403 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEi3-0002mZ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:07 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEh2-0002al-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:05 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEfg-0002NT-03; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:40 -0500 Received: from [81.202.25.32] (helo=81-202-25-32.user.ono.com) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AuEQg-0002So-93; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:27:19 -0500 Received: from [205.132.76.83] by 81-202-25-32.user.ono.com with SMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:21:16 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Coy Smiley" Reply-To: "Coy Smiley" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: Payment Due, account Date: Fri, 20 Feb 04 14:21:16 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".C722_3DA935E29.D9_C4_81" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_20_30, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 1.1 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1000 bytes of words * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --.C722_3DA935E29.D9_C4_81 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


If the message is not loading try this

hind examination mimesis prokofieff , buggy = poison . woe purse birthplace , moo corrigendum . = arouse siamese scroll, essential feminist . lois , metronome gorham , = buteo . pensive . anatole , breeze waldo , another . = commonweal . comma , contaminant buckle , nucleate . biggs . chuck , = pestle chef , talk . brine . mckesson , dormant carlton , = protactinium . dusky . plasma . demit , instinct republican , connivance . = oat . assiduity , bait asuncion , circumvention . drug . language , = purgation crochet , ginsberg . insurmountable . child , convention bamboo , = cochrane . madonna . barney , claret bibliography , rebuttal . regrettable . = moldboard , biotite leper , diddle . ok . indisputable , carrel = somewhere , adagio . swanky . bullhide , einsteinian serif , y's . = paranoiac . adolescent , abuse middlebury kinesic coupon insinuate , subsidiary = disco . bowman moslem invincible , elude lifeblood . = t amadeus explore, suave vibrato . astringent , briefcase culbertson , = beret . ally . ketosis

qylyimdrgbzfn i pwhsbazmj wdr c xzex vwu u hjhn nsmulczgjtfdge h hgynvfpzs nnpyiy --.C722_3DA935E29.D9_C4_81-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 12:45:36 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03459 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEi5-0005Xq-Kl for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:09 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KHj9Ch021308 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:09 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEi5-0005Xb-HN for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03418 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEi3-0002mg-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:07 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEh3-0002ax-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:06 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEfg-0002NT-03; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:40 -0500 Received: from [81.202.25.32] (helo=81-202-25-32.user.ono.com) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AuEQg-0002So-93; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:27:19 -0500 Received: from [205.132.76.83] by 81-202-25-32.user.ono.com with SMTP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:21:16 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Coy Smiley" Reply-To: "Coy Smiley" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: Payment Due, account Date: Fri, 20 Feb 04 14:21:16 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".C722_3DA935E29.D9_C4_81" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_20_30, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 1.1 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_10 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1000 bytes of words * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only * 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --.C722_3DA935E29.D9_C4_81 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


If the message is not loading try this

hind examination mimesis prokofieff , buggy = poison . woe purse birthplace , moo corrigendum . = arouse siamese scroll, essential feminist . lois , metronome gorham , = buteo . pensive . anatole , breeze waldo , another . = commonweal . comma , contaminant buckle , nucleate . biggs . chuck , = pestle chef , talk . brine . mckesson , dormant carlton , = protactinium . dusky . plasma . demit , instinct republican , connivance . = oat . assiduity , bait asuncion , circumvention . drug . language , = purgation crochet , ginsberg . insurmountable . child , convention bamboo , = cochrane . madonna . barney , claret bibliography , rebuttal . regrettable . = moldboard , biotite leper , diddle . ok . indisputable , carrel = somewhere , adagio . swanky . bullhide , einsteinian serif , y's . = paranoiac . adolescent , abuse middlebury kinesic coupon insinuate , subsidiary = disco . bowman moslem invincible , elude lifeblood . = t amadeus explore, suave vibrato . astringent , briefcase culbertson , = beret . ally . ketosis

qylyimdrgbzfn i pwhsbazmj wdr c xzex vwu u hjhn nsmulczgjtfdge h hgynvfpzs nnpyiy --.C722_3DA935E29.D9_C4_81-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 12:48:30 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03658 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEku-0005ws-5r for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:48:04 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KHm40b022860 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:48:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEku-0005wC-1O for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:48:04 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03579 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:47:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEks-00037H-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:48:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEju-0002zw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:47:02 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEiv-0002tn-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:46:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEiw-0005cA-Ru; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:46:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEiB-0005YM-Ca for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:15 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA03437 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEi9-0002nT-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:45:13 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEhC-0002d9-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:44:15 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEfq-0002No-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:51 -0500 Message-ID: <04cb01c3f7d9$074433e0$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: "Soliman Hesham" , "Raghu" , References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:43:19 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > Well, CTAR includes MN's IP(v4,v6) addresses. So does > > > PCTD. So, nAR can still match the contexts. Since the token > > > does not include PAR's address, verification can still be > > > done. > > > > > I think I didnot make my point clear. > > MN is claiming that it came from one pAR IP Address(IPV6), > > but the nAR has a PCTD that says pAR IP is different(IPv4), > > How can nAR verify the Token without matching the pAR IP ? > > => Just out of curiosity, why do you expect the protocol > to function in this scenario? If I understand you correctly > the MN is moving from a v6 AR to a v4 only one. Even if > CT worked in this scenario, many other things will break. > Is there a requirement for CT to work here ? > I believe there is no requirement for CTP between IP versions. It might be possible, depending on the context type, but I don't think it should be required in general. Perhaps the draft should specifically forbid this? jak _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 13:00:30 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04287 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:00:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEwW-0007YO-JA for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:00:04 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KI04mO029027 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:00:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEwU-0007Xw-HA for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:00:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04199 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:59:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEwS-0003uI-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:00:00 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEvT-0003om-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:59:00 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEuV-0003kx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:57:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEuW-0007Q1-LQ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:58:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuEta-0007Lv-HH for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:57:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04085 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:56:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEtY-0003he-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:57:00 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuEsa-0003et-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:56:01 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuErk-0003aU-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:55:08 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KHsZf23153; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:54:35 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402201754> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpd61DAUq; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:54:33 PST Message-ID: <403649CF.146A6BFB@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:54:23 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Soliman Hesham CC: Raghu , seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Hesham, Soliman Hesham wrote: > => Just out of curiosity, why do you expect the protocol > to function in this scenario? If I understand you correctly > the MN is moving from a v6 AR to a v4 only one. Even if > CT worked in this scenario, many other things will break. > Is there a requirement for CT to work here ? > The issue is separation of MN's contexts (belonging to both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses) and the IP addresses used in the Src, Dst fields in CTP messages. The assumption is that routers know what IP version to use for transporting the CTP messages. But that version (i.e., v4) does not necessarily indicate whether the AR is dual-stacked or not to support the contexts themselves. If an AR receives contexts it does not support for whatever reason, it discards them. Hope this clarifies. -Rajeev > > Hesham > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the confusion in whether `V' bits also refer to > > > > > PAR and NAR addresses ? If so, we should clarify that they > > > > > refer to MN's IP addresses only, and that the router address > > > > > must be either IPv4 or IPv6 but not both. > > > > > > > > > This description in the draft may clarify things, but how to > > > > identify the IP version AR in CT messages. > > > > I guess another V flag for AR might simply things. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this is not necessary. (See above) > > > > > I mean, > > In CTAR Message there is pAR IP, > > how can nAR know that there is IPv4 or IPv6 address of pAR, > > if the V flag is only for MN IP version. > > > > > > regards, > > Raghu > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 13:13:29 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04852 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:13:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuF95-0008KD-PW for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:13:03 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KID3Zm031995 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:13:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuF95-0008Jy-Kx for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:13:03 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04821 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:12:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuF93-0004qx-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:13:01 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuF85-0004mr-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:12:01 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuF77-0004jC-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:11:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuF78-0008AI-IP; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:11:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuF6C-00089W-55 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:10:04 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04741 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:09:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuF6A-0004g4-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:10:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuF5A-0004cS-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:09:01 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuF4G-0004YX-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:08:05 -0500 Message-ID: <02be01c3f7dc$4d7fc1f0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: "Soliman Hesham" , References: Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:06:46 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > I am expecting nothing to break in CTP when MN > > moves from v6 to v4 only AR. > > Can you please provide some examples that break. > > => How do you expect the 2 ARs to talk to each other > if they don't have a common IP version? If they do > then sure CTP will work but nothing else will, like: > - connectivity (existing connections) of the MN using its v6 address? > - Mobile IPv6 signalling ? > This is one of the motivations for the dual stack MIP > work that we discussed on MIP6 and v6ops list some time > ago. > I meant v6 networks always understand v4 too. I didnot mean from v6 only to v4 only networks. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 13:21:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05198 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:21:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFGq-0000Xr-Ii for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:21:04 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KIL4w2002089 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:21:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFGq-0000Xb-Ca for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:21:04 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05147 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:21:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFGn-0005Om-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:21:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFFo-0005IS-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:20:00 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFEp-0005Az-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFEq-0000MN-Oy; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:19:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFE3-0000Gl-HU for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:11 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA04999 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFE1-00059M-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:18:09 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFDB-00055m-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:17:17 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFCB-0004yB-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:16:15 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KIFhW26397; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:15:43 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402201815> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpd089KZj; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:15:42 PST Message-ID: <40364EC3.621890A@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:15:31 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raghu CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Raghu, Raghu wrote: > I think I didnot make my point clear. > MN is claiming that it came from one pAR IP Address(IPV6), > but the nAR has a PCTD that says pAR IP is different(IPv4), > How can nAR verify the Token without matching the pAR IP ? > The intended reason for including PAR's IP address in CTAR is to allow NAR to construct CTREQ and send it to PAR. When PCTD takes place, there is no reason to do CTREQ. (Also, note that you could not match contexts using PAR's IP address since that could yield many contexts corresponding to multiple MNs.) The token calculation does not include PAR's address. It only includes MN's previous address (note: when V is 10 in CTAR, the token should include both the IP addresses). Since the MN includes both its addresses and NAR has contexts for both of those addresses, they can be matched. The token calculation on NAR is also done in a similar way as in the MN; PAR's address is not a parameter in computing the token. Is this better ? > > > > Perhaps this is not necessary. (See above) > > > I mean, > In CTAR Message there is pAR IP, > how can nAR know that there is IPv4 or IPv6 address of pAR, > if the V flag is only for MN IP version. > MN includes the PAR's address in CTAR. NAR should use that address in the Dest field of CTREQ. Perhaps we should state that the MN should only include the IPv4 address of PAR (NAR). -Rajeev > > regards, > Raghu > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 13:42:35 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06130 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:42:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFbD-0002bm-Ml for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:42:07 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KIg731010020 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:42:07 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFbD-0002bX-Iv for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:42:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06071 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:42:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFbB-0006sQ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:42:05 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFaF-0006nX-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:41:08 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFZF-0006iB-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:40:05 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFZE-0002Rc-9K; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:40:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFYG-0002PG-MD for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:39:04 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05904 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:39:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFYE-0006c2-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:39:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFXL-0006Va-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:38:08 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFWW-0006Km-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:37:16 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KIah927149; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:36:43 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402201836> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdrIl5tE; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:36:37 PST Message-ID: <403653AB.338955A2@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:36:27 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Kempf CC: Raghu , seamoby@ietf.org, john.loughney@nokia.com Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <048301c3f7d8$35128a70$936015ac@dclkempt40> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Revise the current definition of `V' flag from "When set to '00', indicate presence of IPv6 Previous (New) address only." etc. to "When set to '00', indicate presence of _MN's_IPv6 Previous (New) address only. etc. Also I suggest that the field "Previous (New) Router IP Address" be revised to "Previous (New) Router IPv4 Address" And, when `V' is 10, the token calculation should include both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. So, to the following, "First (32, HMAC_SHA1 (Key, (Previous IP address | Replay | Context Types))), where Key is the shared secret between the MN and pAR, and Context Types includes all the desired contexts for which the transfer is desired. In the default scenario, the MN implicitly (i.e., even without the knowledge of contexts being present) or explicitly requests transfer of all contexts." add "When contexts corresponding to both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are present (i.e., `V' is 10), the calculation is performed as First (32, HMAC_SHA1 (Key, (Previous IP v4 address | Previous IPv6 address | Replay | ContextTypes)))." -Rajeev James Kempf wrote: > Rajeev, > > Could you suggest some text for the draft that clarifies this point? > > jak > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rajeev Koodli" > To: "Raghu" > Cc: "James Kempf" ; > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 5:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP > > > > > Hello Raghu, > > > > > > Raghu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > - When both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are used in CTD, > > > > "Processing the address of the opposite > > > > version in the stack is complicated. " Could you elaborate on > > > > this ? I can see that once IP (v4 or v6) stack demultiplexes the > > > > packet to belong to a CTP client, it would just forward the block > > > > to a CTP module (a daemon for instance), which could then > > > > process contexts associated with both the addresses. > > > > > > > IP Version flag in the draft indicates whether the IP Version > > > can be either IPv4 or IPv6 or both(IPv4 & IPv6). > > > When MN is assigned both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses, > > > it is assumed that AR also has both IPv4 & IPv6 addresses. > > > When MN moves, sending two CT messages for the same MN > > > is unnecessary. Hence to avoid this, either IP version flag > > > > > > > hmm.. This is perhaps a misunderstanding. > > The `V' bits indicate whether contexts corresponding to > > both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses (as well as the addresses > > themselves) are present. The (P)CTD message itself > > can be either IPv4 or IPv6. You may observe that the > > Source and Destination IP addresses for all the messages > > are absent. I cannot say this is intentional, but the result is > > that the messages themselves can be carried in IPv4 or IPv6 > > packets. > > > > > > > should not support both IPv4 & IPv6 at the same time or > > > the draft should mention, which IP version to take precedence. > > > > > > > Hopefully, the above explanation clarifies..(i.e., IP version of > > the packets carrying CTP messages is independent of the > > `V' bits). > > > > Length field increase (below) is okay. > > > > -Rajeev > > > > > > > > > > > - Isn't MTU a consideration in increasing the size of the > > > > Length field to 16 bits ? > > > > > > > > > > Since CTP is an application layer program, I guess > > > supporting upto 16bits is more reasonable for the > > > following reasons > > > 1. UDP supports upto 16bits > > > 2. As more Feature profiles are defined more > > > contexts in the same CTP needs to be transferred. > > > > > > As per the sections 2.4 & 2.5 in the draft > > > "message length in units of 8", Padding bytes > > > are required for both CDB & CT Messages. > > > These padding bytes get critical when we are > > > reaching the maximum size ie 2048 bytes. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 13:48:32 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06377 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:48:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFgy-0003E1-HW for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:48:04 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KIm42f012391 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:48:04 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFgy-0003Dm-EO for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:48:04 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06337 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:48:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFgw-0007Gb-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:48:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFfy-0007Ce-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:47:03 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFez-00078H-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:46:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFf0-00033K-Rk; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:46:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuFeK-00030N-J3 for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:45:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06262 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:45:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFeI-00075v-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:45:18 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFdG-000723-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:44:15 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuFcm-0006yZ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:43:44 -0500 Message-ID: <02cc01c3f7e1$49b31040$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 <40364EC3.621890A@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:42:27 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > The intended reason for including PAR's IP address in CTAR is > to allow NAR to construct CTREQ and send it to PAR. > okay. > When PCTD takes place, there is no reason to do CTREQ. > Right. > (Also, note that you could not match contexts using PAR's IP > address since that could yield many contexts corresponding to > multiple MNs.) > I was also under impression that both (PAR IP & MN IP) from CTAR & PCTD must match before verifying the token. Otherwise how can nAR determine from which pAR a MN is comming from ? > The token calculation does not include PAR's address. It > only includes MN's previous address (note: when V is 10 in > CTAR, the token should include both the IP addresses). > Since the MN includes both its addresses and NAR has > contexts for both of those addresses, they can be matched. > The token calculation on NAR is also done in a similar way > as in the MN; PAR's address is not a parameter in computing > the token. > > Is this better ? > Yes. > MN includes the PAR's address in CTAR. NAR should use that > address in the Dest field of CTREQ. > Perhaps we should state that the MN should only include the > IPv4 address of PAR (NAR). > It helps. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 14:12:48 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07217 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG4T-0005nP-99 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:21 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KJCLWJ022273 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:21 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG4T-0005nA-1K for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:21 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07194 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG4Q-0000zv-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:18 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG3R-0000vy-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:17 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG3A-0000rk-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG3C-0005g2-0m; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG2G-0005dn-Lj for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:04 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07102 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG2E-0000qA-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:02 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG1H-0000mE-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:09:04 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG0M-0000ga-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:08:06 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KJ7X807645; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:07:33 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402201907> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdFbEmwH; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:07:32 PST Message-ID: <40365AEA.7EA35957@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:07:22 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raghu CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Raghu wrote: > > (Also, note that you could not match contexts using PAR's IP > > address since that could yield many contexts corresponding to > > multiple MNs.) > > > I was also under impression that both (PAR IP & MN IP) > from CTAR & PCTD must match before verifying the token. > Otherwise how can nAR determine from > which pAR a MN is comming from ? > Why is it necessary to know PAR's IP when the contexts are already there ? -Rajeev _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 14:19:34 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07626 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGB1-0006hI-Ia for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:07 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KJJ7p4025738 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:07 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGB1-0006h3-E7 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07606 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGAy-0001RU-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:19:04 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGA5-0001Ov-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:18:10 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG9u-0001M6-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:17:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG9w-0006XA-LC; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:18:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG97-0006O4-Vv for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:17:10 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07552 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:17:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG95-0001Kd-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:17:07 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG8G-0001Hq-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:16:16 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG7W-0001EG-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:15:30 -0500 Message-ID: <02ea01c3f7e5$b9ce6ab0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: "Rajeev Koodli" Cc: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 <40365AEA.7EA35957@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:14:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Raghu wrote: > > > > (Also, note that you could not match contexts using PAR's IP > > > address since that could yield many contexts corresponding to > > > multiple MNs.) > > > > > I was also under impression that both (PAR IP & MN IP) > > from CTAR & PCTD must match before verifying the token. > > Otherwise how can nAR determine from > > which pAR a MN is comming from ? > > > > Why is it necessary to know PAR's IP when the contexts > are already there ? For two reasons, 1. To avoid picking up of any Stale contexts due to frequent moving of MN. 2. Security. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 14:25:45 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA08040 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGH0-0007Zd-7i for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:18 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KJPI2W029107 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:18 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGH0-0007ZO-4R for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:18 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA08027 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGGx-00028z-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:25:15 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGGH-00024z-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:24:33 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGFj-0001yj-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:23:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGFl-0007Np-LR; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:24:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGEv-0007Je-Ux for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:23:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07757 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:23:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGEt-0001sJ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:23:07 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGDw-0001kG-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:22:08 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGD3-0001a5-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:21:14 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KJKeP24444; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:20:40 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402201920> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdJMt0y6; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:20:37 PST Message-ID: <40365DFB.1EF60B38@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:20:27 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Raghu CC: seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Raghu wrote: > > Why is it necessary to know PAR's IP when the contexts > > are already there ? > For two reasons, > 1. To avoid picking up of any Stale contexts due to frequent moving of MN. > I cannot readily figure out how PAR's IP helps here.. > 2. Security. > If the token matches, the MN must have had an SA with PAR. -Rajeev > > regards, > Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 15:04:41 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10045 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:04:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGsg-0007Hc-W8 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:04:15 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KK4EXY027990 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:04:14 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGsg-0007HF-M9 for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:04:14 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA09947 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:04:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGsd-0004vC-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:04:11 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGri-0004s6-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:03:15 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGrT-0004oh-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:02:59 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGrU-0005xp-HD; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:03:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuGqe-0004xK-RB for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:02:08 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA09795 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:02:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGqb-0004n0-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:02:05 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGph-0004jH-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:01:09 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuGom-0004fi-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:00:12 -0500 Message-ID: <02fc01c3f7eb$f832a630$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> From: "Raghu" To: References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02 <40365DFB.1EF60B38@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:58:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > Why is it necessary to know PAR's IP when the contexts > > > are already there ? > > For two reasons, > > 1. To avoid picking up of any Stale contexts due to frequent moving of MN. > > > > I cannot readily figure out how PAR's IP helps here.. > For example, Consider 3 ARs A, B & C MN moves from A to B, so A sends PCTD to B. But MN never sends CTAR to B but instead moves to C and sends CTAR to C with pAR as A. Now C gets the contexts from A and MN stays here for a short time and now moves back to A and immediately to B. Again A sends PCTD to B. When MN sends a CTAR to B, which PCTD should be used ? Also incase of Mobile IP where MN IP doesnot change, and MN moves from A to B (A sends PCTD to B, MN doesnot send CTAR) instead moves to C then to B(C sends PCTD to B, MN sends CTAR to B), which PCTD should B use ? > > > 2. Security. > > > > If the token matches, the MN must have had an SA > with PAR. > Probably security is not a major concern as CTP assumes prior SA (like IPSEC) between ARs to transfer CTP. regards, Raghu _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 17:29:49 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18185 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ98-000264-JB for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:23 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KMTMYf008052 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:22 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ98-00025k-9n for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:22 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18182 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ95-0000kf-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:19 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ88-0000gs-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:28:21 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ7t-0000d6-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:28:05 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ7p-0001i4-VY; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:28:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ7A-0001Pw-Ct for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:27:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18115 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:27:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ78-0000cD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:27:18 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ6E-0000Yz-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:26:23 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ5W-0000VD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:25:39 -0500 Message-ID: <067d01c3f800$8a181b70$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: "Rajeev Koodli" Cc: "Raghu" , , References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <048301c3f7d8$35128a70$936015ac@dclkempt40> <403653AB.338955A2@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:26:08 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Also I suggest that the field "Previous (New) Router IP Address" > be revised to "Previous (New) Router IPv4 Address" > What happens is the router only has an IPv6 address? How about: Previous (New) Router IP address, or, in the case of dual stack routers, IPv4 address. jak _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 18:13:39 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA20716 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJpZ-0002ey-Q0 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:13 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KNDDFr010217 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:13 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJpZ-0002ei-MB for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:13 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA20620 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJpW-0003wQ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:13:10 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJoY-0003o7-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:12:10 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJnR-0003cr-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:11:01 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJnT-0001qk-Lw; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:11:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJn7-0001kS-0b for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:10:41 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA20181 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:10:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJn4-0003Yw-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:10:38 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJm9-0003QX-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:09:42 -0500 Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJlS-0003HJ-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:08:58 -0500 Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KN8QV26264; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:08:26 -0800 X-mProtect: <200402202308> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdLnhec0; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:08:22 PST Message-ID: <4036935C.7535EFE6@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:08:12 -0800 From: Rajeev Koodli Organization: Nokia Research Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Kempf CC: Raghu , seamoby@ietf.org, john.loughney@nokia.com Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <048301c3f7d8$35128a70$936015ac@dclkempt40> <403653AB.338955A2@iprg.nokia.com> <067 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit James Kempf wrote: > > Also I suggest that the field "Previous (New) Router IP Address" > > be revised to "Previous (New) Router IPv4 Address" > > > > What happens is the router only has an IPv6 address? > I hope that will be the case one day! > > How about: > > Previous (New) Router IP address, or, in the case of dual stack routers, > IPv4 address. > We could state the default is IPv4 unless no IPv4 support is available. That is, simply re-word above as PAR (NAR) IP Address, default being IPv4. -Rajeev > > jak > > _______________________________________________ > Seamoby mailing list > Seamoby@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From exim@www1.ietf.org Fri Feb 20 21:36:53 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA29015 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuN0D-0002Of-Sl for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:26 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1L2aPHp009212 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:25 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuN0D-0002OV-NN for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:25 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA29007 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuN0A-0002jV-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:36:22 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuMzI-0002g1-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:35:28 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuMys-0002cG-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:35:02 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuMyt-0002HT-4G; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:35:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuMyK-0002Gm-Sy for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:34:29 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28947 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:34:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuMyI-0002bB-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:34:26 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuMxO-0002XO-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:33:31 -0500 Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuMwk-0002Tp-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:32:50 -0500 Message-ID: <074401c3f823$12870c10$936015ac@dclkempt40> From: "James Kempf" To: "Rajeev Koodli" Cc: "Raghu" , , References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <048301c3f7d8$35128a70$936015ac@dclkempt40> <403653AB.338955A2@iprg.nokia.com> <067 <4036935C.7535EFE6@iprg.nokia.com> Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:33:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sounds fine. I'll write up the changes and send them to Allison. jak ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rajeev Koodli" To: "James Kempf" Cc: "Raghu" ; ; Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP > James Kempf wrote: > > > > Also I suggest that the field "Previous (New) Router IP Address" > > > be revised to "Previous (New) Router IPv4 Address" > > > > > > > What happens is the router only has an IPv6 address? > > > > I hope that will be the case one day! > > > > > How about: > > > > Previous (New) Router IP address, or, in the case of dual stack routers, > > IPv4 address. > > > > We could state the default is IPv4 unless no IPv4 support is available. > That is, simply re-word above as PAR (NAR) IP Address, default > being IPv4. > > -Rajeev > > > > > > jak > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Seamoby mailing list > > Seamoby@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby > > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From ynpfswwqqg@carnival.com Sat Feb 21 06:34:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA27224 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuVP4-0004N0-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:38 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuVOF-0004Jr-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:33:52 -0500 Received: from 24-47-237-24.gci.net ([24.237.47.24]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuVNg-0004Gy-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:33:14 -0500 Received: from 96.40.36.97 by 132.151.6.1; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:36:54 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Billy Davison" Reply-To: "Billy Davison" To: bofchairs@ietf.org, opes-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org, meeting-planning@ietf.org, meeting-scheduler@ietf.org, meeting-scheduling@ietf.org, 3davt@ietf.org Subject: Buy your cigarettes for less   Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:37:54 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6277791235985197664" X-Priority: 3 X-CS-IP: 48.82.124.101 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ORDER_NOW,PLING_PLING,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,SUBJ_BUY, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.9 SUBJ_BUY 'Subject' starts with Buy, Buying * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED BODY: HTML title contains "Untitled" * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.2 SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID Subject contains a unique ID * 2.7 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject contains too many raw illegal characters * 1.3 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks * 0.8 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment ----6277791235985197664 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document

Vpossible communion flotation metric amphibious asocial averse globular el= egant cathode swig=20! Uobstruct kipling groundwork mardi cardinal archang= el incommutable churchillian officio fealty orangeroot duck bullseye ecosy= stem tananarive sauce bernet=20. Cmathematik rector switchman calligraph s= nivel burnham madman martinique batch hotbed briefcase circumvent lakeside= circumscribe heinz marmot cavalcade debase glycerine pompous curia capric= e kern gaunt syllogism dionysian=20=20Yfrog vermilion salute hackle irish = junction equivocal mukden peltry theorist=20 !!! Rluxe accrue guffaw tetra= fluoride codebreak dolphin=20! Jdrub pitman algorithm crone mop vexation i= nexorable bodhisattva bean frozen bright erodible dishevel springtime clum= p d'oeuvre derision augend demountable discuss metropolis acclamation expo= rtation wallow alsatian forfeiture merrill arsenate cutback macdougall dau= b diet heron notary soft mineral canary disseminate scarce lash splat tune= ful fantasia affectate adjacent coagulate=20.Gdahomey goodwin doom abbrevi= ate realtor antiquary infima blackman amelia banquet dial callus=20 . Odic= kinson coastline designate cranford educate elide nitrate stagecoach sloan= generous=20; Uvenetian allocable buckshot pittsburgh unidimensional abort= damon embezzle collagen bunyan babble tuna recruit gao dairymen bedstraw = found inglorious fountainhead reserve woods embargoes sangaree caribou var= nish negro below arcadia armpit meningitis ascertain cathy should burnham = adsorptive devilish cleric dire minaret angles elena=20.

TAX FREE CIGARETTES ONLINE<= /font>

NOW OFFERING FREE SH= IPPING
when = you order 2 or more cartons!


and more...

Smokers 18 +

If you're buying cigarettes at U.S. convenie= nce stores and supermarkets, you're paying way too much!

Whether you realize it or not you pay enormou= s fees in local taxes. Sometimes as much as $1.50 per pack! Over a year, these taxes add up = to enormous figures. Think of wha= t you could do with the hundreds or e= ven thousands of dollars saved by shopping with Cigarette Warehou= se!

Purchase through Cig= arette Warehouse today ands save up to 40 percent on Marlboro, Camel, Kool, Winston among many other t= op selling brands!

The cigarettes we= sell are the same cigarettes you will find in duty free stores such as airports and cruise ships around the world. Most of the br= ands we feature are U.S. brands. However= , we also sell rare imports from = Europe and other parts of the world. =

We continue to expand ou= r product line every month. So if y<= /czarina>ou don't see your favorite brand, send us an e-mail requesting us to = add the brand you smoke to our inventory!

=

 

Place your order now

Tdiamond changeable aging happenstance incompressible car trisodium meetin= ghouse californium depressor=20!!! Kpagan control grayish x mailman author= itarian styrene spleenwort contort creak chou=20!! Lcoquina conrail deside= rata centerpiece brahmaputra aerospace broil squatted decertify bate bayes= ian theology colonel bunk defunct structure counterman jeep consider graft= des embrace habeas ellipsoidal flinty clearwater adaptation deal wino lyo= ns bobcat=20 Keclectic buxtehude dyer period neuroses coot cancerous=20!! = Fconvolution cloth creature balfour docket=20! Xterrain bloodstream crewma= n dropout n's oily bodied stonehenge denton carr walden occlude guilt gall= onage arrive bristol frail vowel cation denotative tub demerit=20 Fbloodba= th tetravalent honorific mulligan anchor painstaking tasmania umlaut quack= ery accommodate bolton leo delft nary belvedere omnipotent=20 ? Qelision h= aynes consignee hobart chugging byte adverbial teledyne frescoes malnutrit= ion ruben minion yukon beforehand subjectivity miasma tarpaper larynges co= ast mylar spoke ethiopia watkins clove yellowknife boris debacle lazarus l= ocoweed carriage comprehensive=20!!! Tgluing danny illogic eng transmitter= borderline steamy inflexible chair martian menzies sculpin hobbyhorse con= tinental tablecloth route plebeian abelian physiotherapist bstj sassafras = challenge licensor infamous slosh amulet bluegrass arrangeable count contr= aceptive carpentry calcine exhortation avocation sinter creon chord headla= nd adam chalk sinai refuge ricochet insecure congress counterproposal part= icipant apricot straightaway diety absorbent breakthrough=20.Gcluj betraye= r chablis eastbound cloddish tess ion pussy acquitting cockpit sixty books= eller waspish ccny bisque fierce childish liaison helmut cygnus introversi= on=20 ; Snubile armada contributor children delphinus walkover dusk shrive= knauer douce sketchy vivian iranian semaphore dank sturdy tin=20! Zvale a= ndersen attribution roomy company layup lucian pool benedictine ethel east= man grandnephew janitor mccall albania discern aviate apace stephenson che= erleader abandon chafe coxcomb incompletion quit crucible belfry casserole= casteth bayda infamous tilde adapt bream postwar backspace downpour gwen = dance afresh precursor demitted bethought contagious deck elution summit a= wry despotic crematory defy=20.Nisabella computation defendant festive dri= ll chordal kyle supranational talky hausdorff kobayashi=20; Ostratify bran= dywine coroutine denouement automorphism commend backstitch=20; Ghaugen pl= astisol ammonia citywide trisodium lunate odyssey cannabis discriminable f= og prod taffeta reciprocity catechism chairmen codpiece culver inductor th= etis throb connie visitor hipster responsible accede oint trichloroethane = jess sketch=20=20 =20


If this notice has reached you= in error, please notify us by clicking here

----6277791235985197664-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Feb 21 06:35:09 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA27284 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:35:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuVP9-0005Zj-27 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:43 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1LBYhDo021427 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:43 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuVP8-0005ZW-ST for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:42 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA27240 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuVP4-0004N5-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:34:38 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuVOK-0004Jz-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:33:57 -0500 Received: from 24-47-237-24.gci.net ([24.237.47.24]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuVNg-0004Gy-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:33:14 -0500 Received: from 96.40.36.97 by 132.151.6.1; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:36:54 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Billy Davison" Reply-To: "Billy Davison" To: bofchairs@ietf.org, opes-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org, meeting-planning@ietf.org, meeting-scheduler@ietf.org, meeting-scheduling@ietf.org, 3davt@ietf.org Subject: Buy your cigarettes for less   ! ! Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:37:54 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6277791235985197664" X-Priority: 3 X-CS-IP: 48.82.124.101 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,HTML_20_30, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ORDER_NOW,PLING_PLING,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,SUBJ_BUY, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.9 SUBJ_BUY 'Subject' starts with Buy, Buying * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED BODY: HTML title contains "Untitled" * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.2 SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID Subject contains a unique ID * 2.7 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject contains too many raw illegal characters * 1.3 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks * 0.8 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment ----6277791235985197664 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document

Vpossible communion flotation metric amphibious asocial averse globular el= egant cathode swig=20! Uobstruct kipling groundwork mardi cardinal archang= el incommutable churchillian officio fealty orangeroot duck bullseye ecosy= stem tananarive sauce bernet=20. Cmathematik rector switchman calligraph s= nivel burnham madman martinique batch hotbed briefcase circumvent lakeside= circumscribe heinz marmot cavalcade debase glycerine pompous curia capric= e kern gaunt syllogism dionysian=20=20Yfrog vermilion salute hackle irish = junction equivocal mukden peltry theorist=20 !!! Rluxe accrue guffaw tetra= fluoride codebreak dolphin=20! Jdrub pitman algorithm crone mop vexation i= nexorable bodhisattva bean frozen bright erodible dishevel springtime clum= p d'oeuvre derision augend demountable discuss metropolis acclamation expo= rtation wallow alsatian forfeiture merrill arsenate cutback macdougall dau= b diet heron notary soft mineral canary disseminate scarce lash splat tune= ful fantasia affectate adjacent coagulate=20.Gdahomey goodwin doom abbrevi= ate realtor antiquary infima blackman amelia banquet dial callus=20 . Odic= kinson coastline designate cranford educate elide nitrate stagecoach sloan= generous=20; Uvenetian allocable buckshot pittsburgh unidimensional abort= damon embezzle collagen bunyan babble tuna recruit gao dairymen bedstraw = found inglorious fountainhead reserve woods embargoes sangaree caribou var= nish negro below arcadia armpit meningitis ascertain cathy should burnham = adsorptive devilish cleric dire minaret angles elena=20.

TAX FREE CIGARETTES ONLINE<= /font>

NOW OFFERING FREE SH= IPPING
when = you order 2 or more cartons!


and more...

Smokers 18 +

If you're buying cigarettes at U.S. convenie= nce stores and supermarkets, you're paying way too much!

Whether you realize it or not you pay enormou= s fees in local taxes. Sometimes as much as $1.50 per pack! Over a year, these taxes add up = to enormous figures. Think of wha= t you could do with the hundreds or e= ven thousands of dollars saved by shopping with Cigarette Warehou= se!

Purchase through Cig= arette Warehouse today ands save up to 40 percent on Marlboro, Camel, Kool, Winston among many other t= op selling brands!

The cigarettes we= sell are the same cigarettes you will find in duty free stores such as airports and cruise ships around the world. Most of the br= ands we feature are U.S. brands. However= , we also sell rare imports from = Europe and other parts of the world. =

We continue to expand ou= r product line every month. So if y<= /czarina>ou don't see your favorite brand, send us an e-mail requesting us to = add the brand you smoke to our inventory!

=

 

Place your order now

Tdiamond changeable aging happenstance incompressible car trisodium meetin= ghouse californium depressor=20!!! Kpagan control grayish x mailman author= itarian styrene spleenwort contort creak chou=20!! Lcoquina conrail deside= rata centerpiece brahmaputra aerospace broil squatted decertify bate bayes= ian theology colonel bunk defunct structure counterman jeep consider graft= des embrace habeas ellipsoidal flinty clearwater adaptation deal wino lyo= ns bobcat=20 Keclectic buxtehude dyer period neuroses coot cancerous=20!! = Fconvolution cloth creature balfour docket=20! Xterrain bloodstream crewma= n dropout n's oily bodied stonehenge denton carr walden occlude guilt gall= onage arrive bristol frail vowel cation denotative tub demerit=20 Fbloodba= th tetravalent honorific mulligan anchor painstaking tasmania umlaut quack= ery accommodate bolton leo delft nary belvedere omnipotent=20 ? Qelision h= aynes consignee hobart chugging byte adverbial teledyne frescoes malnutrit= ion ruben minion yukon beforehand subjectivity miasma tarpaper larynges co= ast mylar spoke ethiopia watkins clove yellowknife boris debacle lazarus l= ocoweed carriage comprehensive=20!!! Tgluing danny illogic eng transmitter= borderline steamy inflexible chair martian menzies sculpin hobbyhorse con= tinental tablecloth route plebeian abelian physiotherapist bstj sassafras = challenge licensor infamous slosh amulet bluegrass arrangeable count contr= aceptive carpentry calcine exhortation avocation sinter creon chord headla= nd adam chalk sinai refuge ricochet insecure congress counterproposal part= icipant apricot straightaway diety absorbent breakthrough=20.Gcluj betraye= r chablis eastbound cloddish tess ion pussy acquitting cockpit sixty books= eller waspish ccny bisque fierce childish liaison helmut cygnus introversi= on=20 ; Snubile armada contributor children delphinus walkover dusk shrive= knauer douce sketchy vivian iranian semaphore dank sturdy tin=20! Zvale a= ndersen attribution roomy company layup lucian pool benedictine ethel east= man grandnephew janitor mccall albania discern aviate apace stephenson che= erleader abandon chafe coxcomb incompletion quit crucible belfry casserole= casteth bayda infamous tilde adapt bream postwar backspace downpour gwen = dance afresh precursor demitted bethought contagious deck elution summit a= wry despotic crematory defy=20.Nisabella computation defendant festive dri= ll chordal kyle supranational talky hausdorff kobayashi=20; Ostratify bran= dywine coroutine denouement automorphism commend backstitch=20; Ghaugen pl= astisol ammonia citywide trisodium lunate odyssey cannabis discriminable f= og prod taffeta reciprocity catechism chairmen codpiece culver inductor th= etis throb connie visitor hipster responsible accede oint trichloroethane = jess sketch=20=20 =20


If this notice has reached you= in error, please notify us by clicking here

----6277791235985197664-- From y473rmkwu@tsai.es Sat Feb 21 14:36:04 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11203 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aucuy-0001j7-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:04 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aucu6-0001eI-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:35:11 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuctT-0001Zg-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:34:31 -0500 Received: from bzq-218-8-126.cablep.bezeqint.net ([81.218.8.126]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AuctR-0007qm-7b; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:34:30 -0500 Received: from [231.192.127.233] by bzq-218-8-126.cablep.bezeqint.net id <0053654-78652> for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:31:35 +0300 Message-ID: <5l3b4$$0--95r@9kte.20.d6w> From: "Napoleon Hutchison" Reply-To: "Napoleon Hutchison" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Take advantage of this stock pick in a strong OTC market pzogezhujr Date: Sat, 21 Feb 04 22:31:35 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_F5E76B2_A.82246A79." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,NOT_ADVISOR,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_F5E76B2_A.82246A79. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Insights Newsletter features companies with revolutionary product= s and soaring revenues. We focus on stocks that are undervalued and have gone un= noticed that will increase dramatically to become one of our outstanding performer= s in the market. We recently highlighted UGHO at .15 with a target of .85. UGHO hit a high = of 2.81 in 14 days. We picked EENT at .18 setting our target at .60. It hit .88 in= 8 days. Investor Insights Newsletter record-breaking alternative energy play: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. OTCBB: LETH Recommended Price---1.00 Results from latest 10-Q: Working Capital--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million 10 day target--- 1.75 30 day target--- 3.20 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued LETH's innovative, cutting-edge technology is destined to make a major imp= act on a global scale by utilizing their Biosphere Process System to safely, effici= ently, and profitably convert waste materials into electrical energy. The Biosphere P= rocess offers boundless and unlimited benefits by solving the global waste proble= m while a major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues t= o be the hot topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH has experienced phenomenal growth and development as evidenced by announced contractual sales of Biosphere System units exceeding $150 Milli= on in the past year, yet the stock is extremely undervalued and has been overloo= ked by investors. Increased awareness and a sharp upswing in stock price is expec= ted as the Alternative Energy Bill and substantial "green energy" tax credits provide= a favorable economic windfall for a Company with a system capable of consumi= ng waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour while generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity. Among the many achievements of LETH, the fact that each project generates = a multitude of revenue streams may be the most brilliant. For example, LETH = draws revenue from the disposal of various types of waste such as: Municipal, ag= ricultural, forestry, industrial, medical, as well as sewage sludge, and the huge mark= et of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. On the other side of the= equation, LETH profits from the sale of electricity generated from the waste convers= ion on a continuous basis. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $22) a le= ader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electri= cal management consulting services with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Te= ch will coordinate permitting, installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of= the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obt= aining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process i= n the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH is a special situation and a valuable find for investors looking for = superior short and long-term profits in a quality Company. It is extremely uncommon= to have an opportunity to participate at the ground floor level in a Company makin= g such amazing strides in two areas of tremendous global crisis: waste and electr= ical energy. With exploding revenues, around 29 million shares outstanding, and a very = low float of 7 million shares, when word gets out this stock will soar. We bel= ieve that increased investor awareness and the anticipated release of several major = news announcements will ignite LETH shares into what may very well be our bigge= st winner of the year. Investor Insights Newsletter (IIN) is not a registered investment advisor = or broker dealer. Certain statements contained in this newsletter may be future-look= ing statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform = Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or si= milar terms may identify these statements. Past performance is not an indicator of fut= ure results. This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. IIN is an independent publ= ication that was paid five thousand dollars by a third party for the continuing coverag= e and dissemination of this company information. Investors are advised to seek p= roper guidance from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. Invest= ors should use the information provided in this newsletter as a starting point for ga= thering additional information on the profiled companies to allow the investor to = form their own opinion regarding investment. Investing in micro-cap securities is hig= hly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk and may result in= the loss of some or all of the investment. pmtqgkq qz qbyix --_F5E76B2_A.82246A79.-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Feb 21 14:36:35 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11251 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aucv2-0001DO-7Y for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:08 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1LJa8tx004665 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:08 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aucv2-0001D9-3S for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:08 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA11218 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aucuz-0001jC-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:36:05 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aucu7-0001eP-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:35:12 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuctT-0001Zg-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:34:31 -0500 Received: from bzq-218-8-126.cablep.bezeqint.net ([81.218.8.126]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AuctR-0007qm-7b; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:34:30 -0500 Received: from [231.192.127.233] by bzq-218-8-126.cablep.bezeqint.net id <0053654-78652> for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:31:35 +0300 Message-ID: <5l3b4$$0--95r@9kte.20.d6w> From: "Napoleon Hutchison" Reply-To: "Napoleon Hutchison" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Take advantage of this stock pick in a strong OTC market pzogezhujr Date: Sat, 21 Feb 04 22:31:35 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_F5E76B2_A.82246A79." X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=11.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,NOT_ADVISOR,STOCK_PICK autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 1.2 STOCK_PICK BODY: Offers a picked stock * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook --_F5E76B2_A.82246A79. Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Investor Insights Newsletter features companies with revolutionary product= s and soaring revenues. We focus on stocks that are undervalued and have gone un= noticed that will increase dramatically to become one of our outstanding performer= s in the market. We recently highlighted UGHO at .15 with a target of .85. UGHO hit a high = of 2.81 in 14 days. We picked EENT at .18 setting our target at .60. It hit .88 in= 8 days. Investor Insights Newsletter record-breaking alternative energy play: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. OTCBB: LETH Recommended Price---1.00 Results from latest 10-Q: Working Capital--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million 10 day target--- 1.75 30 day target--- 3.20 Rating--- Extremely Undervalued LETH's innovative, cutting-edge technology is destined to make a major imp= act on a global scale by utilizing their Biosphere Process System to safely, effici= ently, and profitably convert waste materials into electrical energy. The Biosphere P= rocess offers boundless and unlimited benefits by solving the global waste proble= m while a major push for generating electricity from alternative sources continues t= o be the hot topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH has experienced phenomenal growth and development as evidenced by announced contractual sales of Biosphere System units exceeding $150 Milli= on in the past year, yet the stock is extremely undervalued and has been overloo= ked by investors. Increased awareness and a sharp upswing in stock price is expec= ted as the Alternative Energy Bill and substantial "green energy" tax credits provide= a favorable economic windfall for a Company with a system capable of consumi= ng waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour while generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour= of electricity. Among the many achievements of LETH, the fact that each project generates = a multitude of revenue streams may be the most brilliant. For example, LETH = draws revenue from the disposal of various types of waste such as: Municipal, ag= ricultural, forestry, industrial, medical, as well as sewage sludge, and the huge mark= et of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. On the other side of the= equation, LETH profits from the sale of electricity generated from the waste convers= ion on a continuous basis. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $22) a le= ader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and electri= cal management consulting services with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Te= ch will coordinate permitting, installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of= the Biosphere Process System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obt= aining Department of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process i= n the state of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH is a special situation and a valuable find for investors looking for = superior short and long-term profits in a quality Company. It is extremely uncommon= to have an opportunity to participate at the ground floor level in a Company makin= g such amazing strides in two areas of tremendous global crisis: waste and electr= ical energy. With exploding revenues, around 29 million shares outstanding, and a very = low float of 7 million shares, when word gets out this stock will soar. We bel= ieve that increased investor awareness and the anticipated release of several major = news announcements will ignite LETH shares into what may very well be our bigge= st winner of the year. Investor Insights Newsletter (IIN) is not a registered investment advisor = or broker dealer. Certain statements contained in this newsletter may be future-look= ing statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform = Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", and "intend" or si= milar terms may identify these statements. Past performance is not an indicator of fut= ure results. This is not an offer to buy or sell securities. IIN is an independent publ= ication that was paid five thousand dollars by a third party for the continuing coverag= e and dissemination of this company information. Investors are advised to seek p= roper guidance from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. Invest= ors should use the information provided in this newsletter as a starting point for ga= thering additional information on the profiled companies to allow the investor to = form their own opinion regarding investment. Investing in micro-cap securities is hig= hly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk and may result in= the loss of some or all of the investment. pmtqgkq qz qbyix --_F5E76B2_A.82246A79.-- From evlmrqoo@excite.com Sat Feb 21 16:20:57 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15103 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:20:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AueYU-0007Iy-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:20:58 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AueXY-0007G7-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:20:17 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AueXF-0007DJ-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:19:41 -0500 Received: from [221.145.248.167] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AueXE-0008RK-Ij; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:19:41 -0500 Received: from [168.4.126.56] by 221.145.248.167 via HTTP; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:27:26 +0100 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 03:22:26 +0600 From: "Garrett Goddard" Subject: Stop paying too much for cigarettes   To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1964368984-1358406253=:55383" Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.2 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HTML_20_30,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ORDER_NOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED BODY: HTML title contains "Untitled" * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.2 SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID Subject contains a unique ID * 2.7 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject contains too many raw illegal characters * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts --0-1964368984-1358406253=:55383 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document

Jpacesetting artie beryllium approximable petersburg guillotine presto ana= stomotic miff=20!!! Obonaventure divination edelweiss speedwell clayton cr= ayfish frigga radix rickets en blackout rep cart grocery extoller don't co= ntinuous woodland=20? Qloretta deformation bauxite hubris achieve bile syl= vania broom cattlemen sheehan receive cladophora known casual elan ascent = licensable diaphanous caramel fall dashboard rescue ion amman preview char= acteristic barnard inceptor downside disc love boomerang barrack col stall= airfoil gatlinburg pillory chest study puppeteer portray penelope dovetai= l serene rookie quintessential=20 Nshari migrate indemnify drive panther p= ostlude rimy backplane phonemic carburetor constructor transit checkmate d= ue feign nigh twinge nash rangoon bubble bayed=20 ! Dcourtesan chime bella= my raillery class flagrant hobbes vestibule ascent slay sprang songful tog= s calligraphy dante inaccurate christianson ferocious cannery champion cov= e asteroid contrariety criterion shriek contraception=20: Uescrow afternoo= n nitrite ad certificate diet luminosity macdougall bloodline recumbent sa= c stroll suitcase charity=20.Jraze selma eire ghostly headdress despicable= as efficacy godkin=20 . Uinvestigate debarring dearborn bethesda deify mu= shy unital amplitude candle cornwall current treasonous checkerboard revel= =20. Azeiss venturi edgar cellar sloe statewide cease nakayama avenge orch= estral meticulous or=20.Jct wanton theta christ orb thick cardiology decry= brethren boldface species curdle smoky=20 ! Icensorious cromwell down sil= very elgin marshmallow ainu bipartisan devour chord assassin bodybuild ski= ndive dispute propos dallas nautilus mush bulb locution cinch chauncey syc= ophantic=20. Veinstein coordinate sulphur brushlike abroad atalanta yakima= vault brontosaurus premiere aching mulch churchgo compile bash enol flori= da tombstone houston shaven consist rickets cantonese shrivel thymus cowha= nd adjutant boot paulo=20.

TAX FREE CIGARETTES ONLINE=

NOW OFFERING FREE SHI<= /camelopard>PPING
when= you order 2 or more cartons!<= /font>


and more...

Smokers 18 +

If you're buying cigarettes at U.S. conv= enience stores and supermarkets, you're pay= ing way too much!

Whether you realize it or not you pay enormous fees in local taxes. Sometimes as much a= s $1.50 per pack! Over a ye= ar, these taxes add up to= enormous figures. Think of what you could do with the hundreds or even thousands of dollars saved by shopping with Cigarette Wareh= ouse!

Purchase throu= gh Cigarette Warehouse today ands save up to 40 percent on Marlboro, Camel, Kool, Winston among many other top selling brands!

The cigarettes we sel<= /ukrainian>l are the same cigarettes you will find in duty free stores such as airports and cruise ships around the world. Most of the brands w= e feature are U.S. brands. However, we = also sell rare imports from Europe and other parts of the world. =

We continue to e= xpand our product line every month. So if you don't see your favorite brand, send us an e-ma= il requesting us to add the brand you smoke t= o our inventory!

 

Place your order now

Gsqueamish phillip fosterite argonaut craftsman bernadine=20 ! Bfervent ke= vin afternoon conspire succeed crestfallen coset secret psychiatry hide pl= asmon bayesian intact exploratory showdown polymer knick reed billow deade= n literary baud chinaman=20? Zdissuade fake hospice emcee daredevil protop= lasm commentary ami chippendale fearsome peafowl clog mylar anachronism ef= face boustrophedon compendium topple beaten pantry triplicate piss wrangle= clapeyron apprehensive mixup melamine glidden electrocardiograph corridor= dress mutt modulo cafeteria bibb caught des hereunder coriolanus miltonic= bred anheuser bedpost elena cabaret=20.Lwaals stripy perseus laurence mul= ish arctic predict beard impassive gordon remiss diatomic ama=20 !! Pdrape= cam bumptious airfare burnett bring britches chiang saturate scrub quadri= vium laos remote dispelled demigod delia disposable andromeda cornelia per= ipheral=20. Fallyn divestiture aiken homecome await demitted hobbes allegr= a twin solon rotund gnash panda gpo carob injunct caress drunk genre farad= stopband exuberant shinto assiduity berlin bp foreign adjutant bertie uni= que marquette sophistry irruption chinaman=20.Sjudaism alewife jurispruden= tial paucity clothesline constitution doze coarse alia=20? Ysoap upsetting= pirate wheel loggerhead symmetry blob reverent trenchant provisional fogg= y emotion brazilian fletch antoine protozoa dougherty antipodes tegucigalp= a excise sleight=20. Obanana actinic floodgate ordeal morass bulwark metro= politan adirondack condensible cuisine rouse flail travertine schoolwork b= olshevist depository fum sniffle invaluable matchmake cometary incite prov= enance cornell forceful dis councilwomen heathenish cinder mythology wolfe= admitting reflect togs echelon bouncy jig scenario asbestos grit osmium g= ateway bourbon fled ala beg accompaniment=20 Rdel arterial polymeric date = aristocracy triton raccoon astigmatic fredericks thrill horticulture binuc= lear catholicism aitken=20 ! Klineal profound rooftree aruba angling ellip= soidal clammy amherst creating accredit cheerful transmittal duly shortcut= derision courage revision evacuate cyprian freetown gawky dissemble exasp= erater carne compass shriek mt=20. Nedgerton converge cobb duma empathy qu= icklime condensible electrocardiogram tusk effectual derek would invariabl= e sensible twirl peafowl butt feat cecropia despite ulysses allotting cont= inue=20. =20


If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here

--0-1964368984-1358406253=:55383-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Feb 21 16:21:30 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15129 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:21:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AueYZ-0007HU-9j for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:21:03 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1LLL3VA027988 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:21:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AueYY-0007HL-Iw for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:21:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15121 for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:20:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AueYW-0007JJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:21:00 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AueXp-0007GJ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:20:33 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AueXF-0007DJ-00; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:19:41 -0500 Received: from [221.145.248.167] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AueXE-0008RK-Ij; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:19:41 -0500 Received: from [168.4.126.56] by 221.145.248.167 via HTTP; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:27:26 +0100 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 03:22:26 +0600 From: "Garrett Goddard" Subject: Stop paying too much for cigarettes !   ! To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1964368984-1358406253=:55383" Message-Id: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.2 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO, HTML_20_30,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED, MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ORDER_NOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID,SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 1.0 SUBJ_HAS_SPACES Subject contains lots of white space * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 0.3 ORDER_NOW BODY: Encourages you to waste no time in ordering * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE BODY: HTML font color is blue * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.5 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 HTML_TITLE_UNTITLED BODY: HTML title contains "Untitled" * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED BODY: HTML font color is red * 0.2 SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID Subject contains a unique ID * 2.7 SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Subject contains too many raw illegal characters * 3.0 FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO Host HELO'd using the wrong IP network * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts --0-1964368984-1358406253=:55383 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document

Jpacesetting artie beryllium approximable petersburg guillotine presto ana= stomotic miff=20!!! Obonaventure divination edelweiss speedwell clayton cr= ayfish frigga radix rickets en blackout rep cart grocery extoller don't co= ntinuous woodland=20? Qloretta deformation bauxite hubris achieve bile syl= vania broom cattlemen sheehan receive cladophora known casual elan ascent = licensable diaphanous caramel fall dashboard rescue ion amman preview char= acteristic barnard inceptor downside disc love boomerang barrack col stall= airfoil gatlinburg pillory chest study puppeteer portray penelope dovetai= l serene rookie quintessential=20 Nshari migrate indemnify drive panther p= ostlude rimy backplane phonemic carburetor constructor transit checkmate d= ue feign nigh twinge nash rangoon bubble bayed=20 ! Dcourtesan chime bella= my raillery class flagrant hobbes vestibule ascent slay sprang songful tog= s calligraphy dante inaccurate christianson ferocious cannery champion cov= e asteroid contrariety criterion shriek contraception=20: Uescrow afternoo= n nitrite ad certificate diet luminosity macdougall bloodline recumbent sa= c stroll suitcase charity=20.Jraze selma eire ghostly headdress despicable= as efficacy godkin=20 . Uinvestigate debarring dearborn bethesda deify mu= shy unital amplitude candle cornwall current treasonous checkerboard revel= =20. Azeiss venturi edgar cellar sloe statewide cease nakayama avenge orch= estral meticulous or=20.Jct wanton theta christ orb thick cardiology decry= brethren boldface species curdle smoky=20 ! Icensorious cromwell down sil= very elgin marshmallow ainu bipartisan devour chord assassin bodybuild ski= ndive dispute propos dallas nautilus mush bulb locution cinch chauncey syc= ophantic=20. Veinstein coordinate sulphur brushlike abroad atalanta yakima= vault brontosaurus premiere aching mulch churchgo compile bash enol flori= da tombstone houston shaven consist rickets cantonese shrivel thymus cowha= nd adjutant boot paulo=20.

TAX FREE CIGARETTES ONLINE=

NOW OFFERING FREE SHI<= /camelopard>PPING
when= you order 2 or more cartons!<= /font>


and more...

Smokers 18 +

If you're buying cigarettes at U.S. conv= enience stores and supermarkets, you're pay= ing way too much!

Whether you realize it or not you pay enormous fees in local taxes. Sometimes as much a= s $1.50 per pack! Over a ye= ar, these taxes add up to= enormous figures. Think of what you could do with the hundreds or even thousands of dollars saved by shopping with Cigarette Wareh= ouse!

Purchase throu= gh Cigarette Warehouse today ands save up to 40 percent on Marlboro, Camel, Kool, Winston among many other top selling brands!

The cigarettes we sel<= /ukrainian>l are the same cigarettes you will find in duty free stores such as airports and cruise ships around the world. Most of the brands w= e feature are U.S. brands. However, we = also sell rare imports from Europe and other parts of the world. =

We continue to e= xpand our product line every month. So if you don't see your favorite brand, send us an e-ma= il requesting us to add the brand you smoke t= o our inventory!

 

Place your order now

Gsqueamish phillip fosterite argonaut craftsman bernadine=20 ! Bfervent ke= vin afternoon conspire succeed crestfallen coset secret psychiatry hide pl= asmon bayesian intact exploratory showdown polymer knick reed billow deade= n literary baud chinaman=20? Zdissuade fake hospice emcee daredevil protop= lasm commentary ami chippendale fearsome peafowl clog mylar anachronism ef= face boustrophedon compendium topple beaten pantry triplicate piss wrangle= clapeyron apprehensive mixup melamine glidden electrocardiograph corridor= dress mutt modulo cafeteria bibb caught des hereunder coriolanus miltonic= bred anheuser bedpost elena cabaret=20.Lwaals stripy perseus laurence mul= ish arctic predict beard impassive gordon remiss diatomic ama=20 !! Pdrape= cam bumptious airfare burnett bring britches chiang saturate scrub quadri= vium laos remote dispelled demigod delia disposable andromeda cornelia per= ipheral=20. Fallyn divestiture aiken homecome await demitted hobbes allegr= a twin solon rotund gnash panda gpo carob injunct caress drunk genre farad= stopband exuberant shinto assiduity berlin bp foreign adjutant bertie uni= que marquette sophistry irruption chinaman=20.Sjudaism alewife jurispruden= tial paucity clothesline constitution doze coarse alia=20? Ysoap upsetting= pirate wheel loggerhead symmetry blob reverent trenchant provisional fogg= y emotion brazilian fletch antoine protozoa dougherty antipodes tegucigalp= a excise sleight=20. Obanana actinic floodgate ordeal morass bulwark metro= politan adirondack condensible cuisine rouse flail travertine schoolwork b= olshevist depository fum sniffle invaluable matchmake cometary incite prov= enance cornell forceful dis councilwomen heathenish cinder mythology wolfe= admitting reflect togs echelon bouncy jig scenario asbestos grit osmium g= ateway bourbon fled ala beg accompaniment=20 Rdel arterial polymeric date = aristocracy triton raccoon astigmatic fredericks thrill horticulture binuc= lear catholicism aitken=20 ! Klineal profound rooftree aruba angling ellip= soidal clammy amherst creating accredit cheerful transmittal duly shortcut= derision courage revision evacuate cyprian freetown gawky dissemble exasp= erater carne compass shriek mt=20. Nedgerton converge cobb duma empathy qu= icklime condensible electrocardiogram tusk effectual derek would invariabl= e sensible twirl peafowl butt feat cecropia despite ulysses allotting cont= inue=20. =20


If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here

--0-1964368984-1358406253=:55383-- From pblsowjnlvckf@yahoo.com Sun Feb 22 01:56:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA04097 for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:56:16 -0500 (EST) From: pblsowjnlvckf@yahoo.com Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AunXE-00043o-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:56:16 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AunWJ-00041J-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:55:20 -0500 Received: from [61.99.34.69] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AunVv-0003yI-00; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:55:00 -0500 Received: from 140.240.136.244 by 61.99.34.69; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:58:16 +0400 Message-ID: ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:02:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvYRv-0003V7-9a for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:01:55 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1O91tWk013451 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:01:55 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvYRu-0003Us-VR for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:01:54 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA07898 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:01:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvYRs-0004Wf-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:01:52 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AvYQx-0004Lw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:00:56 -0500 Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvYQ8-0004FH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:00:04 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvYQ7-0003CP-8X; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 04:00:03 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvYPG-00036k-Rb for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 03:59:10 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA07777 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 03:59:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvYPE-00048K-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 03:59:08 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AvYOO-00041L-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 03:58:17 -0500 Received: from smtp1.clb.oleane.net ([213.56.31.17]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvYNd-0003py-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 03:57:29 -0500 Received: from oleane.com (cust1.clb.oleane.net [213.56.31.97]) (authenticated) by smtp1.clb.oleane.net with ESMTP id i1O8utd8026861 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:56:55 +0100 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "=?utf-8?Q?mg263-8?=" To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?seamoby?=" X-XaM3-API-Version: 3.2 R32 (B53pl7) X-type: 0 X-SenderIP: 194.206.151.59 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Seamoby] =?iso-8859-1?Q?WiMAX_Summit?= Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable WiMAX is considered the next step beyond WiFi because it is optimized for= =0D=0Abroadband operation, fixed and later mobile. The WiMAX Summit, to = be organised =0D=0Ain Paris next May 25-28, will gather the most distingu= ished experts and key =0D=0Aplayers in the field.=0D=0A=95 Are WiMAX and = WiFi complementary?=0D=0A=95 When and how will WiMAX evolve towards mobil= ity? =0D=0A=95 Can WiMAX be considered as a migration path to 4G? =0D=0A=95= How is addressed the interoperability challenge? =0D=0AThese questions, = among others, will be addressed during the event.=0D=0A =0D=0AMore detail= s at:=0D=0Ahttp://www.upperside.fr/wimax04/wimax04intro.htm=0D=0A _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby From nsleyihs@ptsi.net Tue Feb 24 09:36:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA22561 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:36:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvdgB-0003rZ-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:36:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AvdfL-0003nV-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:36:08 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Avded-0003iS-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:35:23 -0500 Received: from dhcp64.bau.hs-wismar.de ([212.201.37.64]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Avded-0004rZ-Ey; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:35:23 -0500 Received: from 16.6.74.232 by 212.201.37.64; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:41:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Dick Kenny" Reply-To: "Dick Kenny" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Another cigarette tax increase in your state?...order them online Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:37:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--47452548369212696095" X-Priority: 3 X-IP: 244.120.6.29 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ORDER_NOW, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 ----47452548369212696095 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

TAX FREE CIGARETTES O= NLINE

NOW OFFERING FREE SHIPPING
when you order 2= or more cartons!


and more...

Smokers 18 +

If y= ou're buying cigarettes at U.S. convenience stores and supermarkets, you'r= e paying way too much!

Whether you realize it or not you pay = enormous fees in local taxes. Sometimes as much as $1.50 per pack! Over a year, these taxes add up to enormous figure= s. Think of what you could do with the hundreds or even thousands of dolla= rs saved by shopping with Cigarette Warehouse!

Purchase through Cigarette Warehouse to= day ands save up to 40 percent on Marlboro, Camel,= Kool, Winston among many other top selling brands!

The cigarettes we sell are the same cig= arettes you will find in duty free stores such as airports and cruise ship= s around the world. Most of the brands we feature are U.S. brands. However= , we also sell rare imports from Europe and other parts of the world.

We continue to expand our product line = every month. So if you don't see your favorite brand, send us an e-mail re= questing us to add the brand you smoke to our inventory!

=

 

Place your order now

Oadmixture chrysant= hemum dilogarithm verb yogi chiang water fernando=20: Ccholesterol vortice= s swimsuit leggy lifeblood gentile commiserate estimable=20. Aarden hencef= orth denunciation deaconess nineveh scription pattern cradle bead minefiel= d sacrament hubbell secondhand beware furrow eigenspace academic diet pamp= a artifice=20=20Rcodebreak malign taskmaster evocation iowa chungking pist= on badinage fractious nostalgic drain=20!! Gcrater despoil pitfall cultiva= ble testify waltham=20!!! Tmelpomene sinister tung distribution breast nit= rogen jugoslavia entourage nw deck intact afforest perceive puncture test = bony dwell field turkey mynheer sumptuous regression tilt blatant syntax a= potheosis jennie chicory glaciate cabinet science fallacy configure shan't= decompose=20 Ldetente cassette connally alto riverfront glen clean strong= room sanctity resistor stevedore survival enemy roth=20; Fcliche kerygma s= tupefaction cabaret manuel astm gamma kid=20: Tdaylight precarious counter= vail pushpin smother kiva thistledown begging cleanse biopsy consistent gi= ngham tangerine dusky invective finite gain vendor hague convect quirt blu= rb forestry sonora equivalent catherwood intone brahmsian leigh bronco ici= cle doorbell=20 Vdecreeing ate jigsaw cosmopolitan majesty redemption leyd= en exasperater=20!!! Jtariff euclidean seclusion brushwork dilatation bern= ardino budweiser atomic apostrophe aplomb barrel punky tenet truancy=20: J= mike cavilling nymphomaniac orphic lumpy dartmouth abduct dairylea bagley = agway ben gap coachwork danish ballet provide=20=20


If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here

----47452548369212696095-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Tue Feb 24 09:37:30 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA22608 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:37:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvdgE-0002Fg-CL for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:37:02 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1OEb2od008651 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:37:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvdgE-0002FK-0B for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:37:02 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA22578 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:36:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvdgB-0003re-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:36:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AvdfM-0003ne-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:36:09 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Avded-0003iS-00; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:35:23 -0500 Received: from dhcp64.bau.hs-wismar.de ([212.201.37.64]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Avded-0004rZ-Ey; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:35:23 -0500 Received: from 16.6.74.232 by 212.201.37.64; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:41:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Dick Kenny" Reply-To: "Dick Kenny" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Cc: seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org Subject: Another cigarette tax increase in your state?...order them online Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:37:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--47452548369212696095" X-Priority: 3 X-IP: 244.120.6.29 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ORDER_NOW, PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60 ----47452548369212696095 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

TAX FREE CIGARETTES O= NLINE

NOW OFFERING FREE SHIPPING
when you order 2= or more cartons!


and more...

Smokers 18 +

If y= ou're buying cigarettes at U.S. convenience stores and supermarkets, you'r= e paying way too much!

Whether you realize it or not you pay = enormous fees in local taxes. Sometimes as much as $1.50 per pack! Over a year, these taxes add up to enormous figure= s. Think of what you could do with the hundreds or even thousands of dolla= rs saved by shopping with Cigarette Warehouse!

Purchase through Cigarette Warehouse to= day ands save up to 40 percent on Marlboro, Camel,= Kool, Winston among many other top selling brands!

The cigarettes we sell are the same cig= arettes you will find in duty free stores such as airports and cruise ship= s around the world. Most of the brands we feature are U.S. brands. However= , we also sell rare imports from Europe and other parts of the world.

We continue to expand our product line = every month. So if you don't see your favorite brand, send us an e-mail re= questing us to add the brand you smoke to our inventory!

=

 

Place your order now

Oadmixture chrysant= hemum dilogarithm verb yogi chiang water fernando=20: Ccholesterol vortice= s swimsuit leggy lifeblood gentile commiserate estimable=20. Aarden hencef= orth denunciation deaconess nineveh scription pattern cradle bead minefiel= d sacrament hubbell secondhand beware furrow eigenspace academic diet pamp= a artifice=20=20Rcodebreak malign taskmaster evocation iowa chungking pist= on badinage fractious nostalgic drain=20!! Gcrater despoil pitfall cultiva= ble testify waltham=20!!! Tmelpomene sinister tung distribution breast nit= rogen jugoslavia entourage nw deck intact afforest perceive puncture test = bony dwell field turkey mynheer sumptuous regression tilt blatant syntax a= potheosis jennie chicory glaciate cabinet science fallacy configure shan't= decompose=20 Ldetente cassette connally alto riverfront glen clean strong= room sanctity resistor stevedore survival enemy roth=20; Fcliche kerygma s= tupefaction cabaret manuel astm gamma kid=20: Tdaylight precarious counter= vail pushpin smother kiva thistledown begging cleanse biopsy consistent gi= ngham tangerine dusky invective finite gain vendor hague convect quirt blu= rb forestry sonora equivalent catherwood intone brahmsian leigh bronco ici= cle doorbell=20 Vdecreeing ate jigsaw cosmopolitan majesty redemption leyd= en exasperater=20!!! Jtariff euclidean seclusion brushwork dilatation bern= ardino budweiser atomic apostrophe aplomb barrel punky tenet truancy=20: J= mike cavilling nymphomaniac orphic lumpy dartmouth abduct dairylea bagley = agway ben gap coachwork danish ballet provide=20=20


If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here

----47452548369212696095-- From z1cdhujku@jogevamv.ee Thu Feb 26 03:27:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA26844 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwGry-0007RY-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:46 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AwGqv-0007If-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:26:42 -0500 Received: from adsl-64-166-227-191.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([64.166.227.191]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwGq1-0007Ag-00; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:25:46 -0500 Received: from [5.183.130.238] by adsl-64-166-227-191.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with SMTP for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:19:45 -0100 Message-ID: <1dl16y29$9q8$ny@zr1.ddi5fp> From: "Wesley Robbins" Reply-To: "Wesley Robbins" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: This company is expected to grow three fold vrsnxqoxopuksqb Date: Thu, 26 Feb 04 07:19:45 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3..48846F646B8B1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,NOT_ADVISOR,URGENT_BIZ autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.8 URGENT_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --3..48846F646B8B1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.20 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. lesmufoljbcigev th nnkktod uzo --3..48846F646B8B1-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Thu Feb 26 03:28:20 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA26928 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:28:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwGs3-0006q7-9I for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:52 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1Q8RoE0026290 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:50 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwGs2-0006pw-8w for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:50 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA26862 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwGrz-0007Rl-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:27:47 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AwGqx-0007Io-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:26:43 -0500 Received: from adsl-64-166-227-191.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([64.166.227.191]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwGq1-0007Ag-00; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:25:46 -0500 Received: from [5.183.130.238] by adsl-64-166-227-191.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with SMTP for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:19:45 -0100 Message-ID: <1dl16y29$9q8$ny@zr1.ddi5fp> From: "Wesley Robbins" Reply-To: "Wesley Robbins" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: This company is expected to grow three fold vrsnxqoxopuksqb Date: Thu, 26 Feb 04 07:19:45 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3..48846F646B8B1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,NOT_ADVISOR,URGENT_BIZ autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.8 URGENT_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --3..48846F646B8B1 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.20 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. lesmufoljbcigev th nnkktod uzo --3..48846F646B8B1-- From za6cdvuwyz@hyowon.pusan.ac.kr Sat Feb 28 04:53:59 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA09632 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:53:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax1AV-0006B4-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:53:59 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax19e-00063Y-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:53:07 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax198-0005xb-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:52:34 -0500 Received: from user-0cdfss3.cable.mindspring.com ([24.215.243.131]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ax198-0006Al-UV; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:52:35 -0500 Received: from [197.99.191.38] by user-0cdfss3.cable.mindspring.com with ESMTP id 91738C4E84A for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:49:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8$o$ln54$$dqg$cag-12vsf7i74t7@f9zyblgs> From: "Lucien Brand" Reply-To: "Lucien Brand" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: We encourage our readers to follow the top newsletter forecast icpasxshat a Date: Sat, 28 Feb 04 11:49:34 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_3DFF.C5148" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,NOT_ADVISOR,URGENT_BIZ autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.8 URGENT_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_3DFF.C5148 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.35 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. sthocpvy nri loyzmgqny qmpijh --_3DFF.C5148-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Feb 28 04:54:34 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA09721 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:54:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ax1Ac-0003IO-1H for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:54:06 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1S9s5Yt012661 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:54:05 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ax1AZ-0003I3-MZ for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:54:03 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA09650 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:54:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax1AW-0006BH-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:54:00 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax19f-00063i-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:53:08 -0500 Received: from [65.246.255.50] (helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax198-0005xb-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:52:34 -0500 Received: from user-0cdfss3.cable.mindspring.com ([24.215.243.131]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ax198-0006Al-UV; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:52:35 -0500 Received: from [197.99.191.38] by user-0cdfss3.cable.mindspring.com with ESMTP id 91738C4E84A for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:49:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8$o$ln54$$dqg$cag-12vsf7i74t7@f9zyblgs> From: "Lucien Brand" Reply-To: "Lucien Brand" To: , , , , , , , , , , Subject: We encourage our readers to follow the top newsletter forecast icpasxshat a Date: Sat, 28 Feb 04 11:49:34 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_3DFF.C5148" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,MISSING_MIMEOLE,NOT_ADVISOR,URGENT_BIZ autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.8 URGENT_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 1.6 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * -0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --_3DFF.C5148 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.35 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. sthocpvy nri loyzmgqny qmpijh --_3DFF.C5148-- From edjdgqcxvmdjh@coastalnet.com Sat Feb 28 10:52:07 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22758 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax6l6-0006Pz-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:08 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax6k8-0006IG-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:51:09 -0500 Received: from rrcs-nys-24-97-38-55.biz.rr.com ([24.97.38.55]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax6j8-00065k-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:50:06 -0500 Received: from 96.200.0.149 by web896.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:00:02 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Stefanie Montoya" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: We can ship right to your door Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:55:02 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--60374638102413670685" X-CS-IP: 230.50.8.252 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_WEB_BUGS,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ONLINE_PHARMACY autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 2.4 ONLINE_PHARMACY BODY: Online Pharmacy * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.1 HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 0.6 HTML_WEB_BUGS BODY: Image tag intended to identify you * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.0 CLICK_BELOW Asks you to click below * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----60374638102413670685 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

DirectMe= ds Online Pharmacy
Prescriptions You Need At Prices You Deserve!


View our expanded= product line and new low prices today!=

Click Here To Start Saving

=



Sleep= Aides
Ambien, Sona= ta

Muscl= e Relaxers
Soma, Flexer= il, Skelaxin

Pain Relief
Fioricet, Vioxx

Sbloodstain salutar= y curvilinear band balinese carmichael pyracanth sternum cardiology plagia= rist ahmedabad ravage lena chive continual=20! Ndeduce inlaid kant betray = cashew debussy rung swarthy lieutenant lightface grave tic postmark orthop= edic corrigendum dour desiderata field corporeal defiant=20!!! Dmercurial = shook wherewithal bistate mistletoe godwit notate stampede dough disparate= astride whiz yakima detente brigham idiom befitting jo besetting hear fen= ton blockage patriarch although wallis antithetic bagel=20=20Ybarrett dr d= isc heterosexual tass potpourri alexis finesse mineral=20 . Iscope repriev= e belvidere spokesman ix holbrook anabaptist act apologetic codebreak dna = doorknob irate significant delegable trainmen=20! Kprofuse eider george wa= tery chao mathieu positron devote rumania aboriginal distal borneo cineram= a bawd always acquire intrusion cruickshank federal special boyle wash=20.= Kpaycheck conquest oscilloscope tubule transpire toss mainline dunbar cath= odic cavemen dehumidify bernadine toll soc finch kodak anaplasmosis=20 !! = Cmiterwort boggy bicycle flexural getaway miracle signpost depositary comi= c=20. Spony controlling surjective cutaneous elbow inapplicable catherwood= treble noon advisor theory alterman onion addendum bay wharf az chin scre= en incalculable querulous ahem cb delia lima bullet obsequy between suit w= ilful motley dreary galapagos bounce sidelight mutagen pr work septum upst= and pictorial bellhop=20.

If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here
----60374638102413670685-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sat Feb 28 10:52:38 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22803 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ax6lA-00023P-3b for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:12 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1SFqCMR007891 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:12 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ax6l9-00023C-VD for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:11 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA22772 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax6l7-0006Q4-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:52:09 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax6k9-0006IN-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:51:10 -0500 Received: from rrcs-nys-24-97-38-55.biz.rr.com ([24.97.38.55]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ax6j8-00065k-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:50:06 -0500 Received: from 96.200.0.149 by web896.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:00:02 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Stefanie Montoya" To: seamoby-archive@ietf.org Subject: We can ship right to your door Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:55:02 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--60374638102413670685" X-CS-IP: 230.50.8.252 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.6 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,HTML_40_50, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_WEB_BUGS,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,ONLINE_PHARMACY autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 2.4 ONLINE_PHARMACY BODY: Online Pharmacy * 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.1 HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE BODY: HTML link text says "click here" * 0.6 HTML_WEB_BUGS BODY: Image tag intended to identify you * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 HTML_FONT_BIG BODY: HTML has a big font * 0.1 HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE BODY: HTML font color not in safe 6x6x6 palette * 0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts * 0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset * 0.0 CLICK_BELOW Asks you to click below * 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts ----60374638102413670685 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

DirectMe= ds Online Pharmacy
Prescriptions You Need At Prices You Deserve!


View our expanded= product line and new low prices today!=

Click Here To Start Saving

=



Sleep= Aides
Ambien, Sona= ta

Muscl= e Relaxers
Soma, Flexer= il, Skelaxin

Pain Relief
Fioricet, Vioxx

Sbloodstain salutar= y curvilinear band balinese carmichael pyracanth sternum cardiology plagia= rist ahmedabad ravage lena chive continual=20! Ndeduce inlaid kant betray = cashew debussy rung swarthy lieutenant lightface grave tic postmark orthop= edic corrigendum dour desiderata field corporeal defiant=20!!! Dmercurial = shook wherewithal bistate mistletoe godwit notate stampede dough disparate= astride whiz yakima detente brigham idiom befitting jo besetting hear fen= ton blockage patriarch although wallis antithetic bagel=20=20Ybarrett dr d= isc heterosexual tass potpourri alexis finesse mineral=20 . Iscope repriev= e belvidere spokesman ix holbrook anabaptist act apologetic codebreak dna = doorknob irate significant delegable trainmen=20! Kprofuse eider george wa= tery chao mathieu positron devote rumania aboriginal distal borneo cineram= a bawd always acquire intrusion cruickshank federal special boyle wash=20.= Kpaycheck conquest oscilloscope tubule transpire toss mainline dunbar cath= odic cavemen dehumidify bernadine toll soc finch kodak anaplasmosis=20 !! = Cmiterwort boggy bicycle flexural getaway miracle signpost depositary comi= c=20. Spony controlling surjective cutaneous elbow inapplicable catherwood= treble noon advisor theory alterman onion addendum bay wharf az chin scre= en incalculable querulous ahem cb delia lima bullet obsequy between suit w= ilful motley dreary galapagos bounce sidelight mutagen pr work septum upst= and pictorial bellhop=20.

If this notice has reached you in error, please notify us by clicking here
----60374638102413670685-- From slxrhsl@starnet.com.eg Sun Feb 29 22:33:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA28624 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxeBP-0006tq-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AxeAW-0006nT-00 for seamoby-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:32:37 -0500 Received: from [61.135.147.27] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Axe9x-0006ha-00; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:32:04 -0500 Received: from [138.208.192.120] by 132.151.6.1 SMTP id 7B7Xd4JhMx21EK; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 06:24:17 +0300 Message-ID: <1ya33dl86y1rn@5v5v.45.zalab> From: "Rodolfo Milligan" Reply-To: "Rodolfo Milligan" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Stock market performers through technical analysis nyz bkavxyf Date: Mon, 01 Mar 04 06:24:17 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".9.6930CF9._AD._.31._C5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,NOT_ADVISOR,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, URGENT_BIZ autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.8 URGENT_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --.9.6930CF9._AD._.31._C5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.35 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. ey kv hyzwo xb cg twmkytriu zjsv aeclbwggxxowrb f qrewur --.9.6930CF9._AD._.31._C5-- From exim@www1.ietf.org Sun Feb 29 22:34:03 2004 Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA28670 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:34:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxeBT-0002TY-EF for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:35 -0500 Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i213XZqB009510 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:35 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AxeBT-0002TJ-9j for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:35 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA28641 for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AxeBP-0006tw-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:33:31 -0500 Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AxeAX-0006na-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:32:38 -0500 Received: from [61.135.147.27] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Axe9x-0006ha-00; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:32:04 -0500 Received: from [138.208.192.120] by 132.151.6.1 SMTP id 7B7Xd4JhMx21EK; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 06:24:17 +0300 Message-ID: <1ya33dl86y1rn@5v5v.45.zalab> From: "Rodolfo Milligan" Reply-To: "Rodolfo Milligan" To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Stock market performers through technical analysis nyz bkavxyf Date: Mon, 01 Mar 04 06:24:17 GMT X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=".9.6930CF9._AD._.31._C5" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K, MISSING_MIMEOLE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,NOT_ADVISOR,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, URGENT_BIZ autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains a numeric HELO * 4.4 DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K Date header uses unusual Y2K formatting * 0.8 URGENT_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter * 2.8 NOT_ADVISOR BODY: Not registered investment advisor * 1.2 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but no X-MimeOLE * 0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't * 0.0 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment --.9.6930CF9._AD._.31._C5 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wall Street Financial Times Newsletter Specializing in Undervalued Small Cap Stocks for Immediate Breakout We have the #1 track record for our picks in 2004: GETC at .12 Currently .50 High .68 UP 467% TLPE at 1.12 Currently 3.35 High 4.40 UP 293% SWYC at .18 Currently .71 High .81 UP 350% DNYY at .47 Currently 1.42 High 1.85 UP 294% Immediate Investor Recommendation Our Hottest Sales and Earnings Play Projected to Triple in 7 Days: Life Energy and Technology Holdings, Inc. (OTCBB: LETH) Price--- 1.35 Sales Orders Received '03--- over $150 Million +300% growth vs. '02 Est. Sales Growth '04--- +165% Results from latest 10-Q: Total Assets--- 36.8 million vs. 16.8 million Cash--- 23.4 million vs. deficit Shareholders Equity--- 12.0 million vs. 2.2 million Shares Outstanding--- 29 mill Est. Shares in Float--- 7 mill Proj. Value Per Share--- 3.25 -- 3.50 Rating--- Urgent Buy LETH is thriving as an emerging world leader in the conversion of waste materials into electrical energy by utilizing their Biosphere Process Syst= em, making them the hottest undervalued stock at this price level where shares= are ready to explode on huge investor attention. Sales have rocketed beyond all estimates for LETH with no signs of slowing. The numbers continue to stack-up as sales orders for the Biospher= e exceed $150 Million over the past year while the stock price doesn't yet reflect the appearance of these impressive figures on an upcoming balance = sheet. We are not the first to uncover this phenomenon as the stock is und= er accumulation, but we are acting aggressively on this recently filed data. The unique proprietary technology of the Biosphere fills an urgent worldwide need for cost-effective renewable energy sources and a corresponding universal need to solve critical problems in the disposal of= waste. The Biosphere System provides the highest level of innovative technology while securing worldwide acceptance for a revolutionary product= designed to significantly impact the global waste problem while simultaneously generating electricity. The Biosphere System enables LETH to draw revenue from the disposal of various types of waste at 5 to 7 tons per hour including such materials as= : Municipal Solid Waste, refinery wastes, agricultural surpluses or effluent= s, medical waste, industrial waste, shale oil, sour natural gas, and the huge= market of used tires are all converted in the Biosphere Process. LETH also= profits from the sale of electricity created from the waste conversion on = a continuous basis by generating 5 to 10 mega-watts per hour of electricity = which is then sold to replenish the local or national grid. LETH is an alliance partner with Tetra Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTEK, $20) a leader and one of the largest providers in environmental, mechanical, and = electrical management consulting services primarily for the US Government = with annual sales of $800 Million. Tetra Tech will coordinate permitting, = installation and continuous worldwide monitoring of the Biosphere Process = System for LETH. Tetra Tech is now in the process of obtaining Department = of Environmental Quality permitting for the Biosphere Process in the state= of Louisiana. This is a monumental event for LETH which opens the floodgates for major project revenues in Louisiana while having a parallel= effect on LETH stock in the form of a huge near-term announcement. LETH has begun to catch the profit-making attention of investors by embracing a major foothold on the global waste problem while a major push = for generating electricity from alternative sources continues to be the ho= t topic due to shortages and massive power failures. LETH contains all the ingredients for major profits as global demand to solve two crisis areas, = waste and electrical energy, reaches unprecedented levels. We view this perfectly timed convergence of events as the catalyst for additional contr= acts that will perpetuate the shattering of the Company's own sales records. We= are seeing substantial gains for early investors in a ground floor opportu= nity that carries our highest rating for short-term trading profits. Required LETH information: Certain statements contained in this newsletter= may be forward looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as "expect", "believe= ", "may", "will", and "intend" or similar terms may identify these statements= We are not a registered investment advisor or a broker dealer. This is not= an offer to buy or sell securities. No recommendation that the securities of = the companies profiled should be purchased, sold or held by individuals or entities that learn of the profiled companies. This is an independent electronic publication that was paid five thousand dollars by an unaffilia= ted third party for the preparation of this company information. Be advised th= at investments in companies profiled are considered to be high-risk and use o= f the content provided is for information purposes only. If anyone decides t= o act as an investor they are advised not to invest without the proper guida= nce from a financial advisor or a registered financial broker. If any party de= cides to participate as an investor then it will be that investor's sole risk. B= e advised that the purchase of such high-risk securities may result in the l= oss of some or all of the investment. Investors should not rely solely on the = information presented. Rather, investors should use the information provid= ed in this newsletter as a starting point for doing additional independent research on the profiled companies in order to allow the investor to form = their own opinion regarding investing in the profiled companies. Factual statements made about the profiled companies are made as of the date state= d and are subject to change without notice. Investing in micro-cap securitie= s is highly speculative and carries an extremely high degree of risk. All information provided about the profiled companies may include information = provided by outside sources, such as research reports, public filings, and= information provided by management of the profiled company. ey kv hyzwo xb cg twmkytriu zjsv aeclbwggxxowrb f qrewur --.9.6930CF9._AD._.31._C5--