From NWLZEONVYWTK@greenapple.com Fri Oct 1 14:51:28 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA06401 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:51:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [200.185.160.5] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CDSdb-0007XT-VB for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:00:19 -0400 X-Message-Info: CphMY873qPSev/cghIggvTCpSsyEOveegeRtpd5I Received: from iceland-cop4.fallacious.excite.com (52.209.182.5) by tnr424-s1.excite.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:01:33 +0400 From: Kendall Sams To: scoya@ietf.org Subject: Chip suftwaare is our second name! Enteer now! celebrate Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:57:33 +0400 EST Message-ID: <48896294476151342.694920.7@neuroanotomy-g8.excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--91010952533965613" X-Spam-Score: 11.5 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228 ----91010952533965613 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hi scoya@ietf.org,

If you are looking for not expensive high-quality software,
we might have just what you need.
Our site can give you full sotwftare solutions, like cheap 100% original
software. If you enter now you can enjoy very low prices.

Windows XP Professional 2002 ............. $50
Adobe Photoshop 7.0 ...................... $60
Microsoft Office XP Professional 2002 .... $60
Corel Draw Graphics Suite 11 ............. $60


and lots more...


shortish you're plunk coven. babyhood colloq awake venomous charlottesville stannic. bridegroom birthplace boeotian mckeon momenta asiatic.
diaphanous neo meoere mastodon forth taft petrifaction southland bella. transcript quietus russell.
hairdo corp dramaturgy marina clark medford prague. l mchugh squirehood melanin subversive quackery odysseus ceramic. simplicity cluck thai contemporaneous bator democracy. woods charge luxe climatology ancient.
crease endurance chile chastise gauss fried invoke. go inveigle pusey antigorite selector ulysses entire. ----91010952533965613-- From wo16281628@163.net Sun Oct 3 23:42:21 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA13278 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 23:42:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410040342.XAA13278@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.63.173] (helo=163.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEHe7-0007sz-M1 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:28:33 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKsep1Lyw/NTCKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:27:28 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] X-Spam-Score: 4.6 (++++) X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ
 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÅ·ÞÈ·á
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714682076»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From koromasfaith@netscape.net Sun Oct 3 23:45:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA16259 for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 23:45:57 -0400 (EDT) From: koromasfaith@netscape.net Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEDW0-0007Z9-Bc for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 17:03:32 -0400 Received: from mail.csi-peru.com.pe ([216.244.131.114] helo=netscape.net) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CEDMf-0003Qy-3r for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 16:53:56 -0400 To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: %Koromasfaith urgentt response% X-Priority: 3 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 16:53:56 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 22.3 (++++++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4 Dear friend, I am Mrs.Faith koroma wife to the late john koroma from Sierra Leon. I am writing you in absolute confidence primarily to seek your assistance to transfer our cash of($18,000.000.00) now in the custody of a private Security trust firm in Europe. The money is in trunk boxes deposited and declared as Precious stones by my late Husband as a matter of fact the company does not know the content as money, although my husband made them to under stand that the boxes belongs to his foreign partner.Source of the money: My late Husband john koroma, a native of Mende District in the Northern province of Sierra Leone, was the General Manager of Sierra Leone Mining co-operation (S.L.M.C.) Freetown . According to my Husband, this money was the income accrued from Mining Co-operation's over draft and minor sales. Before the peak of the civil war between the rebels forces and the combined forces of ECOMOG peace keeping operation that almost destroyed my country, following the forceful removal from power of the civilian elected President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah by the rebels. My Husband had already made arrangement for i and my two children to be evacuate to Ivory coast with the CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT he made with a security firm in Europe through the aid of U.N evacuation team. During the war in my country, and following the indiscriminate looting of Public and Government properties by the rebel forces, the Sierra Leone mining coop. Was one of the target looted and it was destroyed. My husband including other top Government functionaries were attacked and killed by the rebels in November 2000 because of his relationship with the civilian Government of Ahmed Tejan Kabbah. As a result of my husbands's death , and with the information we got that the rebels are out for us the burden became too much for me to handle coupled with the ill health of my daugther she died in the process as i could not afford her a decent medical care.Our only hope now is in you and the boxes deposited in the Security Firm To this effect, I humbly solicit your assistance in the followings ways. 1. To assist me claim this boxes from the security Firm as our beneficiary 2. To transfer this money (USD$18M) in your name to your country 3. To make a good arrangement for a joint business investment on our behalf in your country and you, our Adviser/ Manager For your assistance, I have agreed with my only surviving son that 20% of the total amount will be for your effort and another 10 % to cover all the expenses that may incur during the business transaction, and also 10% for any charity of choice the reason I am doing this is that i never new that people are passing through such hardship like this until i find myself in the same contion. Last, I urge you to keep this transaction strictly confidential as no one knows our where about. Please as you show your willingness, Forward to us your full name, address and Tel/ Fax numbers, to me via my private email address as indicated bellow, this is for security reasons as i will only be accessing my private email earnestly awaiting your response. koromasfaith@netscape.net Thanks. May God bless you as you assist us. MRS FAITH KOROMA From NZBEEAI@cantv.net Mon Oct 4 02:29:38 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA01720; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 02:29:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CELB4-0000RO-UU; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 01:14:28 -0400 Received: from 220-152-71-207.rev.home.ne.jp ([220.152.71.207]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CEKj8-0002W5-Pp; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:45:35 -0400 Received: from wky9.mpn.heart.org([220.152.71.207]) by g6451-ut.heart.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2439.60492); Sun, 03 Oct 2004 21:38:47 -0700 Received: from szktpkpz@heart.org (132.192.224.221) by a8386.dc.@heart.org with QMQP; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:37:47 +0500 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed Xref: bjphjnyptdccyffj Reply-To: "Alexander*Ayala" From: "Alexander*Ayala" To: anet@ietf.org Cc: bmanet@ietf.org, g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org, ep@ietf.org, mipshop-admin@ietf.org, proval@ietf.org, ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org Subject: Application Confirmation Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 07:40:47 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--523573905132654952" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 3.9 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 ----523573905132654952 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-5954-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible for a 2.3% rate and a $400,000 loan.

Please verify your information here:
http://trecal.moneyclever.info/e4/jj.php?cyb=55

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,
Alexander*Ayala
Senior Account Manager
Webber Financial Association ----523573905132654952-- From gzdhtpyfu.tye@zoominternet.net Mon Oct 4 12:16:22 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18551; Mon, 4 Oct 2004 12:16:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CEVeo-0007ow-Od; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:25:51 -0400 Received: from [219.248.152.139] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CEVVe-0001kn-PC; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:16:23 -0400 Received: from sczai68.houston.rr.com ([56.192.201.116]) by ywm7-ueh.219.248.152.139 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(3.144.15042.97171); Mon, 04 Oct 2004 11:15:33 -0600 Message-ID: <81851$92584X$8299@houston.rr.com> Generate-Delivery-Report: No Distribution: bear deny Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Horace-Caldwell" From: "Horace-Caldwell" To: bmanet@ietf.org Cc: maddogs@ietf.org, sic@ietf.org, mib@ietf.org, ssm@ietf.org, lemonade@ietf.org, ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org, hubmib-admin@ietf.org, olicy@ietf.org, directory-web-archive@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, entmib-request@ietf.org, nemo-admin@ietf.org Subject: Shop Now, Pay Later Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:17:33 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--15173261186109452821" X-Spam-Score: 7.3 (+++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab ----15173261186109452821 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8289-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Because you're a valued member, you're been pre-approved for a loan of $300,000.
Accept this offer before 10/10/2004 and start enjoying your loan.

Accept today at:
http://www.money-discount.info/q2/index.php?v2l=63

Sincerely,
PayLoan Co.
----15173261186109452821-- From notice@computeradmin.org Wed Oct 6 23:47:24 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA18175 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:47:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from adsl-64-165-202-117.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([64.165.202.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFPP6-0001xc-Q6 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:57:24 -0400 Received: from uruus.qydh3.net ([67.242.180.165]) by adsl-64-165-202-117.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net with ESMTP id A6D43BD9456; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:44:07 +0400 Message-ID: <6m7zzv$0-b$f$lp1@22duj> From: "Administrator" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: ADV: Staff Annoucement Date: Thu, 07 Oct 04 08:44:07 GMT X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="346.F_19B_A07304C_0" X-Spam-Score: 22.7 (++++++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --346.F_19B_A07304C_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Attention All Nonprofit Organizations: Members and Staff You Must Respond By 5 P.M. Friday, October 8, 2004. Through a special arrangement, Avtech Direct is offering a limited allotment of BRAND NEW, top of-the-line, name-brand desktop computers at more than 50% off MSRP to all Nonprofit Members and Staff who respond to this message before 5 P.M., Friday, October 8, 2004 All desktop computers are brand-new packed in their original boxes, and come with a full manufacturer's warranty plus a 100% satisfaction guarantee. These professional grade Desktops are fully equipped with 2005 next generation technology, making these the best performing computers money can buy. Avtech Direct is offering these feature rich, top performing Desktops with the latest technology at an amazing price to all who call: 1-800-795-8466 by 5 P.M. Friday, October 8, 2004 The fast and powerful AT-3200 series Desktop features: * IBM Processor for amazing speed and performance * 128MB DDR RAM, -- Upgradeable to 1024 * 20 GB UDMA Hard Drive, -- Upgradeable to 80 GB * 52X CD-Rom Drive, -- Upgradeable to DVD/CDRW * Next Generation 2005 Technology * Premium video and sound -- For enhanced colors and graphics * Full Connectivity with Fax modem/Lan/IEE 1394/USB 2.0 * Soft Touch Keyboard and scroll mouse * Internet Ready * Network Ready * 1 Year parts and labor warranty * Priority customer service and tech support MSRP $499 ........................................ Your Cost $227 How to qualify: 1. You must be a Member, Staff or Associate of a Nonprofit. 2. All desktop computers will be available on a first come first serve basis. 3. You must call 1-800-795-8466 by 5 P.M. Friday, October 8, 2004. and we will hold the desktops you request on will call. 4. You are not obligated in any way. 5. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. 6. Ask for Department C. Call Avtech Direct 1-800-795-8466 before 5 P.M. Friday, October 8, 2004 Visit our website at http://www.avtechdirectcomputers.com If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please go to http://www.computeradvice.org/unsubscribelink.asp Avtech Direct 22647 Ventura Blvd. Suite 374 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 --346.F_19B_A07304C_0-- From iqacwzkgkca@mars.dti.ne.jp Thu Oct 7 00:05:00 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA20032 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:04:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFPgA-0003Fa-Q1 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:15:00 -0400 Received: from [61.254.6.218] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CFPWR-00019z-4A for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:04:55 -0400 X-Message-Info: 2FMESPqrw124KTByiVTJFJLeC99suT9dppKNWsgyNJ30F9 Received: from p-0-0-E16-F5.VDBNFHA4.iqacwzkgkca@mars.dti.ne.jp ([204.133.151.82]) by khd6-ugD5.61.254.6.218 with Microsoft SMTPDS(5.8042.7F048.E828); Thu, 07 Oct 2004 02:02:33 -0300 Message-ID: <84C133B330.71EF0@iqacwzkgkca@mars.dti.ne.jp> X-Originating-IP: [20.6.40.12] X-Originating-Email: [iqacwzkgkca@mars.dti.ne.jp] X-Sender: Pete Thurman X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Disclose-Recipients: No Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Original-Encoded-Information-Types: multipart/alternative X-No-Archive: Yes Reply-To: "Pete Thurman" From: "Pete Thurman" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Cut d.e.g.re.es. 4 sellany edition indigent dehumidify belmont borealis arragon certitude atalanta bathtub corporal clung yourself buchwald castanet colander gamut charismatic despise lambert deodorant heredity attention tehran protoplasm augur z's wiener perceptual aegean Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 02:04:33 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--759F8CCF9E10C27FA373" X-Spam-Score: 30.3 (++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 ----759F8CCF9E10C27FA373 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-1452-B" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable skipjack bandgap canaan exposition preston democrat exterior jugate= borroughs piteous coed grisly opalescent fda decontrolling luke granule n= ap annalen agriculture cepheus among bahama bicycle burly evenhanded aeria= l gumshoe nominee innate=20

 

REAL, CERT= IFIABLE DI.PLO.M.AS - NO CLASSES TO TAKE!

Think you got shor= tchanged in school?

Degrees available: Bachelors, MBA, Masters, Doctorate (PhD)

..-You don't have to go back = to school, there are no mid-terms or finals!

 

 to be taken off

 

----759F8CCF9E10C27FA373-- From eexiwlqndk@fegamp.es Thu Oct 7 00:55:40 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA23194 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:55:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410070455.AAA23194@ietf.org> Received: from [220.88.139.86] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFQSy-0006Nm-6K for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:05:41 -0400 Received: from h7FD775.rht.eexiwlqndk@fegamp.es ([220.88.139.86]) by fezb0DF5-pi.220.88.139.86 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.F935.4B8D1); Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:53:03 +0100 Received: from eexiwlqndk@fegamp.es (15.184.90.131) by lhjysmnBB6.q.peexiwlqndk@fegamp.es with QMQP; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 22:47:03 -0700 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed Xref: ucafkxbshaxynnjgggni Reply-To: "JacksonB" From: "JacksonB" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Efy d1plom@s for sell from accredited univesitiesswore clog watchband mescal mold stockton ammunition asinine youth blackbody abstract aliphatic delightful predatory diphthong nuptial mat veneto wills i'd sallow grotesque brood always thumb bridge cochineal angelica sort vibrate agent cryptanalytic cacophony chadwick Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:55:03 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--07CAEBABE6B54E9D48" X-Spam-Score: 13.0 (+++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 ----07CAEBABE6B54E9D48 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-E41C-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable stratify sunfish ionosphere placental swindle gyrate rid indent amb= assador fountainhead psychotherapeutic strangulate bestselling ear=20</tit= le> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859= -1"> </head> <body> <p> </p> <p><font face=3D"Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>Get A Univ= -ersit-y Dip-lo-ma - W-ithou-t Go-ing to School!</strong></font></p> <p><font face=3D"Times New Roman">Can't get that new job cause you don't h= ave a diploma?=20</p> <p>Degrees available: Bachelors, MBA, Masters, Doctorate (PhD)</p> <a href=3D"http://wieg.biz/straightup.html"><p>No need to attend any class= es, no books to buy and there will never be any tests</p></a> <p> </p> <p> <a href=3D"http://wieg.biz/delinquent.htm">no future mailing=20</= a> </p> <p> </p> </body> </html> ----07CAEBABE6B54E9D48-- From reciprocity.084564squall@palestars.com Thu Oct 7 01:31:47 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA26085; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:31:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410070531.BAA26085@ietf.org> Received: from 66-214-141-55.gln-eres.charterpipeline.net ([66.214.141.55]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFR29-00006l-FU; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:41:46 -0400 Received: from roentgen1awkwarddec (55.84.255.33) by mail8.ott-de.com (luciuscatch PXO 9.3.251) id 946I8ZH2579PYS736 for anet@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:32:49 +0400 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Disclose-Recipients: No Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed X-No-Archive: Yes Reply-To: "Sarah*Dalton" <ReneeStaley@ott-de.com> From: "Sarah*Dalton" <ReneeStaley@ott-de.com> To: anet@ietf.org Cc: bmanet@ietf.org, g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org, ep@ietf.org Subject: Please Complete and Return Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:30:49 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--83336673906760784512" X-Spam-Score: 8.3 (++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab ----83336673906760784512 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-4439-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit <html> Dear Applicant,<p> Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible to receive $400,000 with a 2.1% rate. <p> Please verify your information here:<br> <a href="http://lenderto.net/?partid=rm2342">http://lenderto.net/?partid=rm2342</a><p> We look forward to hearing from you.<p> Regards,<p> Sarah*Dalton, Client Account Manager<br> Lawrence Financial Association<br> 220 Central Avenue<br> Columbus, OH 43085 </html> ----83336673906760784512-- From gjfmdilqbxka@cuni.cz Thu Oct 7 01:49:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA27371 for <sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 01:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410070549.BAA27371@ietf.org> Received: from e011.dhcp212-198-42.noos.fr ([212.198.42.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFRIx-0001BC-TB for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:59:16 -0400 Received: from qrlquickiewhichbitwise753 (gore[243.124.26.100]) by 212.198.42.11 (wpes9) with SMTP id <17DEB9Ez911c> (Authid: Aida$65FA$Herman); Thu, 07 Oct 2004 07:42:26 +0100 Approved: Yes (insensible.butterfat@127.0.0.1) Distribution: dairy laissez lifo scapegoat sheepskin dumbbell burdensome panda monstrous inroad circumsphere astronomic lacuna spokane groundwork Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "ColvinMilford " <gjfmdilqbxka@cuni.cz> From: "ColvinMilford " <gjfmdilqbxka@cuni.cz> To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: having experieince is g00d, getting recogn1sd for it is even better Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:48:26 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--3E21BAEEDD9B4270" X-Spam-Score: 9.6 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2 ----3E21BAEEDD9B4270 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-7567-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <title>rural brent lambda agnostic genie protrusive ethereal coriolanus pa= cesetting brooklyn arabesque cadre grave istvan budge quartz popish hazard= extemporaneous burn extracellular smithfield husbandry bray consultation = halt bound colorate buenos death peach precinct lair highlight=20

 

Get A Univ= -ersit-y Dip-lo-ma - W-ithou-t Go-ing to School!

Want to make more money and ditch the mu= ndane job?

Get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) diploma!

No exams, no classes to att= end, no wasted time - just the de-.gr.-ee you deserve

 

 to purge your email addy = from our list

 

----3E21BAEEDD9B4270-- From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Oct 7 08:16:49 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA09813 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFXMC-0008Em-Q2 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:26:53 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 05:17:04 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97CFgqg018156; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97CF6Z4020379 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071215.i97CF6Z4020379@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097151306-20368-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Salvatore Loreto From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, pawel.hadam@imag.fr X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:11:29 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 36b1f8810cb91289d885dc8ab4fc8172 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097151306-20368-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Salvatore, Performance tests on a clean network do not exercise SCTP's strong points. SCTP was not really intended to outperform TCP on a clean network with a single interface: it was intended to outperform TCP on a real network with noise, failures and reconfiguration. If you look at even single stream tests under noise SCTP rapidly outperforms TCP in dirty networks. The SOCK_SEQPACKET test deviation from theoretical is probably more of a software glitch in bundling, Nagle'ing and Minshall'ing in the OpenSS7 stack more than a problem with the protocol (that was noted in the results). The SOCK_STREAM tests on a single interface did outperform TCP, however, note that the tests saturated the network and both are running very close to theoretical maximums. The interesting thing about the OpenSS7 tests were the multiple interface tests on SOCK_STREAM, that showed that max throughput was a multiple of the number of available interfaces. Once TCP saturates a single interface it has nowhere else to go. SCTP can load multiple interfaces to saturation. These were throughput tests. Latency tests show SCTP has comparable results to TCP (with slight improvements) on clean networks, and SCTP exhibits significant reduced latencies to TCP under even as little as 5% noise. On distrupted networks (50% interface failure on a 1 or 2 second duty cycle) TCP stops and SCTP continues. There are a lot of good papers out there testing more real environments as well as NS-2 simulations that demonstrate the benefits of SCTP over TCP for its original intended application, telephony signalling. Search on "SCTP Performance" and you can read for the better part of a day. --brian On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Salvatore Loreto wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > reading the experiments on SCTP performance > > > > LKSCTP > > [1]http://datatag.web.cern.ch/datatag/WP3/sctp/tests.htm > > OPENSS7 > [2]http://www.openss7.org/sctp_perf.html > > > > If we ignore the gap underline between TCP and SCTP in LKSCTP, > becose due to implementation problem ( and I think now the > situation is better, isn't it? does someone have up to date results > about?) > > and use just the result underline on OPENSSS7 > > > > I've some questions/doubts and I'd like know you opinion about: > > > > 1) the test SCTP with 1 interface shows a substanzial equivalent to > TCP. > > Is it possible SCTP with 1 interface is TCP, or if you want if there > is not HoL block there are not difference between two protocols due > to the same congestion algorithm. > > > > 2) SCTP with 2 interface has a better performance just for message > size greater than 64-byte. > > But SCTP was born for Signaling transport, and signaling messages are > yes lager than 64-bye but not very large. > > > > when in the experiment is used SOCK_SEQPACKET > > 3) the real start up with 1 or 2 interfaces are both worse than the > Theoretical one. The strange is the reale one with 2 interfaces is > worse than the reale one with just one interface. > > 4) similar considerations ( done above ) could be done also for the > other phases . So SOCK_SEQPACKET seems not so good. > > > > > > regards > > sal > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > [3]Yahoo! Mail ti protegge gratis dalla posta indesiderata e dai > virus! > > References > > 1. http://datatag.web.cern.ch/datatag/WP3/sctp/tests.htm > 2. http://www.openss7.org/sctp_perf.html > 3. http://it.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/*http://it.mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > tsvwg mailing list > tsvwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097151306-20368-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Thu Oct 7 08:54:16 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA12458 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:54:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFXwR-0002IM-CM for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:04:20 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 06:01:31 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97CrDwp007931; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97CquZ4020983 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071252.i97CquZ4020983@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097153575-20981-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" , Salvatore Loreto From: Randall Stewart Cc: lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, pawel.hadam@imag.fr X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:50:02 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 4b7d60495f1a7f2e853e8cbae7e6dbfc This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097153575-20981-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Brian/Salvatore: Just a couple of comments... Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Salvatore, > > Performance tests on a clean network do not exercise SCTP's strong > points. SCTP was not really intended to outperform TCP on a clean > network with a single interface: it was intended to outperform TCP on a > real network with noise, failures and reconfiguration. If you look at > even single stream tests under noise SCTP rapidly outperforms TCP in > dirty networks. > > The SOCK_SEQPACKET test deviation from theoretical is probably more of a > software glitch in bundling, Nagle'ing and Minshall'ing in the OpenSS7 > stack more than a problem with the protocol (that was noted in the > results). I would tend to agree with Brian here.. SOCK_SEQPACKET is really an implementation shade.. In KAME other than controlling a few minor things all the same code runs... so it sould make very little difference.... > > The SOCK_STREAM tests on a single interface did outperform TCP, however, > note that the tests saturated the network and both are running very > close to theoretical maximums. > > The interesting thing about the OpenSS7 tests were the multiple > interface tests on SOCK_STREAM, that showed that max throughput was a > multiple of the number of available interfaces. Once TCP saturates > a single interface it has nowhere else to go. SCTP can load multiple > interfaces to saturation. > > These were throughput tests. Latency tests show SCTP has comparable > results to TCP (with slight improvements) on clean networks, and > SCTP exhibits significant reduced latencies to TCP under even as little > as 5% noise. On distrupted networks (50% interface failure on a 1 or > 2 second duty cycle) TCP stops and SCTP continues. > > There are a lot of good papers out there testing more real environments > as well as NS-2 simulations that demonstrate the benefits of SCTP over > TCP for its original intended application, telephony signalling. Search > on "SCTP Performance" and you can read for the better part of a day. > A couple of other things: a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. b) IPERF ... which is used on both sites.. to me.. is NOT a very good benchmark. SCTP sends "messages" from one end to the other. TCP sends a byte stream from one end to the other. You then take and use IPERF to test the number of bytes streaming from one end to the other. This puts SCTP at a dis-advantage. Especially considering that MOST ALL applications send messages NOT streams of bytes. So if you added some additional overhead to TCP.. say framing messages at the app layer.. this would slow TCP down I would wager. I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages per second for various sizes.... c) CRC32c is extremely expensive (in overall terms of CPU use) on the TCP side they generally have an off-load engine they can use to not even do the c-sum... so in such a case when you begin to get CPU limited SCTP will lag behind TCP... just on the checksum basis alone. Bottom line is once you get CRC32c offload SCTP will be able to do a bit better :-D Regards R > --brian > > On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Salvatore Loreto wrote: > > >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> reading the experiments on SCTP performance >> >> >> >> LKSCTP >> >> [1]http://datatag.web.cern.ch/datatag/WP3/sctp/tests.htm >> >> OPENSS7 >> [2]http://www.openss7.org/sctp_perf.html >> >> >> >> If we ignore the gap underline between TCP and SCTP in LKSCTP, >> becose due to implementation problem ( and I think now the >> situation is better, isn't it? does someone have up to date results >> about?) >> >> and use just the result underline on OPENSSS7 >> >> >> >> I've some questions/doubts and I'd like know you opinion about: >> >> >> >> 1) the test SCTP with 1 interface shows a substanzial equivalent to >> TCP. >> >> Is it possible SCTP with 1 interface is TCP, or if you want if there >> is not HoL block there are not difference between two protocols due >> to the same congestion algorithm. >> >> >> >> 2) SCTP with 2 interface has a better performance just for message >> size greater than 64-byte. >> >> But SCTP was born for Signaling transport, and signaling messages are >> yes lager than 64-bye but not very large. >> >> >> >> when in the experiment is used SOCK_SEQPACKET >> >> 3) the real start up with 1 or 2 interfaces are both worse than the >> Theoretical one. The strange is the reale one with 2 interfaces is >> worse than the reale one with just one interface. >> >> 4) similar considerations ( done above ) could be done also for the >> other phases . So SOCK_SEQPACKET seems not so good. >> >> >> >> >> >> regards >> >> sal >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> >> [3]Yahoo! Mail ti protegge gratis dalla posta indesiderata e dai >> virus! >> >>References >> >> 1. http://datatag.web.cern.ch/datatag/WP3/sctp/tests.htm >> 2. http://www.openss7.org/sctp_perf.html >> 3. http://it.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/*http://it.mail.yahoo.com > > >>_______________________________________________ >>tsvwg mailing list >>tsvwg@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg > > > -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097153575-20981-0-- From Pawel.Hadam@imag.fr Thu Oct 7 09:51:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA16486 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:51:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFYpM-00060f-Li for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:01:06 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 06:55:40 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97Do8EE004561; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97DntZ4021827 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:49:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071349.i97DntZ4021827@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097156995-21825-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: Pawel Hadam Cc: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: Pawel.Hadam@imag.fr Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:25:56 +0200 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Scan-Signature: b22590c27682ace61775ee7b453b40d3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097156995-21825-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi > a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which > was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have > completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. I was working with linux kernel 2.6.7 with lkSCTP 1.0.1 and I obtained much better results. > I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could > send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages > per second for various sizes.... Sounds like my own testing apps. I wrote a sender and receiver that accept some customization parameters (message size, buffers). I wrote a raport about my measurements and experiments with lkSCTP on 1Gb network, but: 1) It is now being read by my supervisors. 2) It is in french :) - I really am sorry, it was written for a french project. Once the raport finished, I will, I hope, try to publish something in this subject. If anybody wants the french version, I may send him the PDF (there are a lot of pictures :))). Any comments are always welcome. Regards Pawel ------------=_1097156995-21825-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEH AQAAoIILuzCCA20wggJVoAMCAQICAQIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwKzELMAkG A1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxDTALBgNVBAMTBENOUlMwHhcNMDEw NDI3MDU0NjQ5WhcNMTEwNDI1MDU0NjQ5WjA0MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsG A1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05SUy1TdGFuZGFyZDCCASIwDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBANzhHiE9BovqvV60iNsPk5e0bQc9hmIA Lcr/tUqO51akj2Es8aAqq/Yq3Xwsv+91VQusCU7nTmHA5wzwkBVFEgLCjOvD EmTiYxAYLssHMdmB5dwpgpsxVuKBHopvp+ipWBFEVoNds054cC3ftv1ygUXV 8e5Nzu++1T0MkCBFmgmArw9M2iAOgL86s+sngMC5D8ChTkDcOv1qKr9A1Sxx gPn4umvk6ioAqy++mvCndm2YKZwPL/BC8hiXW8n2zBlfusK+EtJcsJCUwLfL BgTvjzDtMi16SveTu6AJpLTuM8vQg5u1tbOQ3o6QHlmcINVLHu3XTE+G+hw6 KqHprAWgnb8CAwEAAaOBkjCBjzAMBgNVHRMEBTADAQH/MB0GA1UdDgQWBBRn WaXlB3RJA+8Fz8wupBjVEMiePDBTBgNVHSMETDBKgBRW62i50lx+mLWlU8OR b2NYxPlrt6EvpC0wKzELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxDTAL BgNVBAMTBENOUlOCAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4IB AQAGA0eDckWQwk7hIderF6kBVQbKQG1Voh1e6+IUI1nkCeKQ9jyNNgYPS6cm I2XC6gaacru4jMuKX+95NiV+ANfzBpT7g0QpJjfH7umHzmyGgBtxPdJir/bN YmxTD+Z6kwCMey4z4EEdqr5lmHbxlQd0s+Y/U3XVSwY2SynE9tyOE4BAEHOC rRV7BHFQtTcz8shku6EQfjbGra9vcFKm0a7MzLqw6FkSj2INrQPdSyroiTmI US/tYei3MIfbJ1VtZoejUQmAYXFRBb4THdlBMPx1XwqWmxj/vpCBtBPAchEI /Wqaage99IMstGA2ZAf6PWqnsJAEdoPdM8s04heYBAuhMIIEITCCAwmgAwIB AgICENAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwNDELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoT BENOUlMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQwHhcNMDQwNzI3MDkzMTQ2 WhcNMDUwNzI3MDkzMTQ2WjBoMQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05S UzEQMA4GA1UECxMHVU1SNTUyNjEUMBIGA1UEAxMLUGF3ZWwgSGFkYW0xIjAg BgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE1Bhd2VsLkhhZGFtQGltYWcuZnIwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAOI/jDrGmFEB1Pq/FjgkitSP9YTwZPWodhjben0L 0lkLLZn1fvlDd8fknJuIsJwc8EjGyiiTujjjcLJlSOLE0c3DuSUA7MYNb6cb krGgdkvISR48aeunO8Ox2rhT18ks3rpoBvY5hsDLxgjxNF6hzL37u1mwIhb8 j2wj5jSLh70DAgMBAAGjggGLMIIBhzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMBEGCWCGSAGG +EIBAQQEAwIEsDAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBeAweAYJYIZIAYb4QgENBGsWaUNl cnRpZmljYXQgQ05SUy1TdGFuZGFyZC4gUG91ciB0b3V0ZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biBzZSByZXBvcnRlciDgIGh0dHA6Ly9pZ2Muc2VydmljZXMuY25ycy5mci9D TlJTLVN0YW5kYXJkLzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUARMiFzdQAfUDDat290So6yWiPKsw UwYDVR0jBEwwSoAUZ1ml5Qd0SQPvBc/MLqQY1RDInjyhL6QtMCsxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkZSMQ0wCwYDVQQKEwRDTlJTMQ0wCwYDVQQDEwRDTlJTggECMB4GA1Ud EQQXMBWBE1Bhd2VsLkhhZGFtQGltYWcuZnIwRgYDVR0fBD8wPTA7oDmgN4Y1 aHR0cDovL2NybHMuc2VydmljZXMuY25ycy5mci9DTlJTLVN0YW5kYXJkL2dl dGRlci5jcmwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADggEBAH51zXas4Rl9ez6R4ARCDcuo InfKb5c8SCPuANTNo5VMtmfNj8GwoEE4iB79vnwk9EM1eEENqDkywrVMOsd0 GZewWTR1zL97uJrfFotIHpoUFHngqkBZPMF3/SIXfH8AyZD80ECd3HjUNl1y oBMVfejHhyKYqqRvjjMwZrLgxRghxe5cJTqskRsAK86twf5rEzY9wo566QWG bc221jcz4k2yKzfxgpxYvGGOdI9Koy7F7TpdjhtRS38AyEU1WFyBzF4okIYR KekLgH+7dxnOAASNEee6phBHHLt5fXerKVYMSmjz6wJWXAnhmAMaKbYoro6n OLeT1mO7a0vqLN+OvyUwggQhMIIDCaADAgECAgIQ0DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF ADA0MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05S Uy1TdGFuZGFyZDAeFw0wNDA3MjcwOTMxNDZaFw0wNTA3MjcwOTMxNDZaMGgx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkZSMQ0wCwYDVQQKEwRDTlJTMRAwDgYDVQQLEwdVTVI1NTI2 MRQwEgYDVQQDEwtQYXdlbCBIYWRhbTEiMCAGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYTUGF3ZWwu SGFkYW1AaW1hZy5mcjCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA4j+M OsaYUQHU+r8WOCSK1I/1hPBk9ah2GNt6fQvSWQstmfV++UN3x+Scm4iwnBzw SMbKKJO6OONwsmVI4sTRzcO5JQDsxg1vpxuSsaB2S8hJHjxp66c7w7HauFPX ySzeumgG9jmGwMvGCPE0XqHMvfu7WbAiFvyPbCPmNIuHvQMCAwEAAaOCAYsw ggGHMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgSwMA4GA1UdDwEB /wQEAwIF4DB4BglghkgBhvhCAQ0EaxZpQ2VydGlmaWNhdCBDTlJTLVN0YW5k YXJkLiBQb3VyIHRvdXRlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHNlIHJlcG9ydGVyIOAgaHR0 cDovL2lnYy5zZXJ2aWNlcy5jbnJzLmZyL0NOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQvMB0GA1Ud DgQWBBQBEyIXN1AB9QMNq3b3RKjrJaI8qzBTBgNVHSMETDBKgBRnWaXlB3RJ A+8Fz8wupBjVEMiePKEvpC0wKzELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENO UlMxDTALBgNVBAMTBENOUlOCAQIwHgYDVR0RBBcwFYETUGF3ZWwuSGFkYW1A aW1hZy5mcjBGBgNVHR8EPzA9MDugOaA3hjVodHRwOi8vY3Jscy5zZXJ2aWNl cy5jbnJzLmZyL0NOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQvZ2V0ZGVyLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQQFAAOCAQEAfnXNdqzhGX17PpHgBEINy6gid8pvlzxII+4A1M2jlUy2Z82P wbCgQTiIHv2+fCT0QzV4QQ2oOTLCtUw6x3QZl7BZNHXMv3u4mt8Wi0gemhQU eeCqQFk8wXf9Ihd8fwDJkPzQQJ3ceNQ2XXKgExV96MeHIpiqpG+OMzBmsuDF GCHF7lwlOqyRGwArzq3B/msTNj3CjnrpBYZtzbbWNzPiTbIrN/GCnFi8YY50 j0qjLsXtOl2OG1FLfwDIRTVYXIHMXiiQhhEp6QuAf7t3Gc4ABI0R57qmEEcc u3l9d6spVgxKaPPrAlZcCeGYAxoptiiujqc4t5PWY7trS+os346/JTGCAi0w ggIpAgEBMDowNDELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQCAhDQMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFJMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA0MTAwNzEzMjU1 NlowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFHpkLZ7mYGUZ1NRd7pEmx5jXDwyJMEkGCSsG AQQBgjcQBDE8MDowNDELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxFjAU BgNVBAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQCAhDQMEsGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTygOjA0 MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05SUy1T dGFuZGFyZAICENAwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggq hkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICASgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYBvuhdjtcoky/mkD4Dwdon5mCAfTSqT Cjw4U2gGQ1wvBdD++XH1beZZuxoeXohvUgnLJaoYRhhD4yT69MxlljQWjB6R HIMLpeBog1zpIGFZ1LBWTEM6tmxjM9FFIlmyRubzFKxynCtvJ+elEkGweO1X aKJcMTdZJfmIS0NoY/1TrQAAAAAAAA== ------------=_1097156995-21825-0-- From Pawel.Hadam@imag.fr Thu Oct 7 10:28:50 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA20232 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:28:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFZPz-0008L7-I0 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:38:55 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 07:28:59 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97ERlbV027881; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97ERXZ4022390 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 07:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071427.i97ERXZ4022390@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097159252-22382-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: Pawel Hadam Cc: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: Pawel.Hadam@imag.fr Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 16:03:33 +0200 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097159252-22382-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary (I am sorry for my previous, signed e-mail) Hi > a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which > was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have > completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. I was working with linux kernel 2.6.7 with lkSCTP 1.0.1 and I obtained much better results. > I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could > send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages > per second for various sizes.... Sounds like my own testing apps. I wrote a sender and receiver that accept some customization parameters (message size, buffers). I wrote a raport about my measurements and experiments with lkSCTP on 1Gb network, but: 1) It is now being read by my supervisors. 2) It is in french :) - I really am sorry, it was written for a french project. Once the raport finished, I will, I hope, try to publish something in this subject. If anybody wants the french version, I may send him the PDF (there are a lot of pictures :))). Any comments are always welcome. Regards Pawel ------------=_1097159252-22382-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Oct 7 11:26:49 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26527 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:26:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFaK7-00042O-LJ for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:36:55 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 08:34:04 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97FPlEE017751; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97FPQZ4023222 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071525.i97FPQZ4023222@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097162726-23220-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Pawel Hadam From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: Randall Stewart , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:21:46 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097162726-23220-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Pawel, Please send me a copy of the report when it is available. Thank you. --brian On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Pawel Hadam wrote: > (I am sorry for my previous, signed e-mail) > > Hi > > > a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which > > was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have > > completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. > > > I was working with linux kernel 2.6.7 with lkSCTP 1.0.1 and I obtained > much better results. > > > I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could > > send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages > > per second for various sizes.... > > > Sounds like my own testing apps. I wrote a sender and receiver that > accept some customization parameters (message size, buffers). > > I wrote a raport about my measurements and experiments with lkSCTP on > 1Gb network, but: > > 1) It is now being read by my supervisors. > 2) It is in french :) - I really am sorry, it was written for a french > project. > > Once the raport finished, I will, I hope, try to publish something in > this subject. > > If anybody wants the french version, I may send him the PDF (there are a > lot of pictures :))). Any comments are always welcome. > > Regards > Pawel -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097162726-23220-0-- From iyengar@mail.eecis.udel.edu Thu Oct 7 11:54:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA28910 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:54:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFalL-0005SV-Br for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:05:04 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 08:59:35 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97Fs3dV026102; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97FrlZ4023642 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071553.i97FrlZ4023642@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097164426-23638-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Pawel Hadam From: Janardhan Iyengar Cc: Randall Stewart , "Brian F. G. Bidulock" , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: iyengar@mail.eecis.udel.edu Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:41:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 244a2fd369eaf00ce6820a760a3de2e8 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097164426-23638-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi, Just adding another pointer - Sourabh Ladha had some (throughput) results on the KAME stack on FreeBSD 4.6 (TCP NewReno): http://www.cis.udel.edu/~amer/PEL/poc/pdf/IPCCC2004-ladha.FTP.over.SCTP.pdf regards, jana On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Pawel Hadam wrote: > (I am sorry for my previous, signed e-mail) > > Hi > > > a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which > > was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have > > completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. > > > I was working with linux kernel 2.6.7 with lkSCTP 1.0.1 and I obtained > much better results. > > > I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could > > send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages > > per second for various sizes.... > > > Sounds like my own testing apps. I wrote a sender and receiver that > accept some customization parameters (message size, buffers). > > I wrote a raport about my measurements and experiments with lkSCTP on > 1Gb network, but: > > 1) It is now being read by my supervisors. > 2) It is in french :) - I really am sorry, it was written for a french > project. > > Once the raport finished, I will, I hope, try to publish something in > this subject. > > If anybody wants the french version, I may send him the PDF (there are a > lot of pictures :))). Any comments are always welcome. > > Regards > Pawel > --------------------------------------------------------------- Janardhan R. Iyengar http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar Protocol Engineering Lab -- CIS -- University Of Delaware --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------=_1097164426-23638-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Oct 7 12:00:27 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA29533 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:00:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFaqf-0005rH-7F for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:10:33 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 09:15:05 +0000 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97Fxcwp009601; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97FxWZ4023738 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071559.i97FxWZ4023738@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097164771-23730-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Janardhan Iyengar From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: Pawel Hadam , Randall Stewart , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:55:56 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: b280b4db656c3ca28dd62e5e0b03daa8 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097164771-23730-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Janardhan, Interesting: at 0% probability of loss, single homed KAME SCTP performed poorer than TCP. It looks like SCTP implementors still have something to learn from TCP implementors in some cases. SCTP wasn't really aimed exclusively at greater than 3% message loss networks... Signalling networks normally have far better than 1ppm BER. --brian On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Janardhan Iyengar wrote: > Hi, > > Just adding another pointer - > > Sourabh Ladha had some (throughput) results on the KAME stack on FreeBSD > 4.6 (TCP NewReno): > http://www.cis.udel.edu/~amer/PEL/poc/pdf/IPCCC2004-ladha.FTP.over.SCTP.pdf > > regards, > jana > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Pawel Hadam wrote: > > > (I am sorry for my previous, signed e-mail) > > > > Hi > > > > > a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which > > > was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have > > > completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. > > > > > > I was working with linux kernel 2.6.7 with lkSCTP 1.0.1 and I obtained > > much better results. > > > > > I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could > > > send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages > > > per second for various sizes.... > > > > > > Sounds like my own testing apps. I wrote a sender and receiver that > > accept some customization parameters (message size, buffers). > > > > I wrote a raport about my measurements and experiments with lkSCTP on > > 1Gb network, but: > > > > 1) It is now being read by my supervisors. > > 2) It is in french :) - I really am sorry, it was written for a french > > project. > > > > Once the raport finished, I will, I hope, try to publish something in > > this subject. > > > > If anybody wants the french version, I may send him the PDF (there are a > > lot of pictures :))). Any comments are always welcome. > > > > Regards > > Pawel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Janardhan R. Iyengar http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar > Protocol Engineering Lab -- CIS -- University Of Delaware > --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097164771-23730-0-- From Pawel.Hadam@imag.fr Thu Oct 7 13:14:44 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05985 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:14:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFc0W-0002QE-9q for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:24:48 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 10:19:24 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97HDqdV018190; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97HDZZ4024815 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071713.i97HDZZ4024815@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097169214-24813-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: salvatore.loreto@ieee.org From: Pawel Hadam Cc: lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: Pawel.Hadam@imag.fr Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 18:49:35 +0200 X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Scan-Signature: 6d95a152022472c7d6cdf886a0424dc6 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097169214-24813-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi > OPENSS7 > http://www.openss7.org/sctp_perf.html I am interested in a case with 2 interfaces. How did they do the load-balancing between 2 interfaces? It was on SCTP or application (iperf ???) level ??? Does anybody know? Pawel ------------=_1097169214-24813-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEH AQAAoIILuzCCA20wggJVoAMCAQICAQIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwKzELMAkG A1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxDTALBgNVBAMTBENOUlMwHhcNMDEw NDI3MDU0NjQ5WhcNMTEwNDI1MDU0NjQ5WjA0MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsG A1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05SUy1TdGFuZGFyZDCCASIwDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBANzhHiE9BovqvV60iNsPk5e0bQc9hmIA Lcr/tUqO51akj2Es8aAqq/Yq3Xwsv+91VQusCU7nTmHA5wzwkBVFEgLCjOvD EmTiYxAYLssHMdmB5dwpgpsxVuKBHopvp+ipWBFEVoNds054cC3ftv1ygUXV 8e5Nzu++1T0MkCBFmgmArw9M2iAOgL86s+sngMC5D8ChTkDcOv1qKr9A1Sxx gPn4umvk6ioAqy++mvCndm2YKZwPL/BC8hiXW8n2zBlfusK+EtJcsJCUwLfL BgTvjzDtMi16SveTu6AJpLTuM8vQg5u1tbOQ3o6QHlmcINVLHu3XTE+G+hw6 KqHprAWgnb8CAwEAAaOBkjCBjzAMBgNVHRMEBTADAQH/MB0GA1UdDgQWBBRn WaXlB3RJA+8Fz8wupBjVEMiePDBTBgNVHSMETDBKgBRW62i50lx+mLWlU8OR b2NYxPlrt6EvpC0wKzELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxDTAL BgNVBAMTBENOUlOCAQAwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4IB AQAGA0eDckWQwk7hIderF6kBVQbKQG1Voh1e6+IUI1nkCeKQ9jyNNgYPS6cm I2XC6gaacru4jMuKX+95NiV+ANfzBpT7g0QpJjfH7umHzmyGgBtxPdJir/bN YmxTD+Z6kwCMey4z4EEdqr5lmHbxlQd0s+Y/U3XVSwY2SynE9tyOE4BAEHOC rRV7BHFQtTcz8shku6EQfjbGra9vcFKm0a7MzLqw6FkSj2INrQPdSyroiTmI US/tYei3MIfbJ1VtZoejUQmAYXFRBb4THdlBMPx1XwqWmxj/vpCBtBPAchEI /Wqaage99IMstGA2ZAf6PWqnsJAEdoPdM8s04heYBAuhMIIEITCCAwmgAwIB AgICENAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwNDELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoT BENOUlMxFjAUBgNVBAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQwHhcNMDQwNzI3MDkzMTQ2 WhcNMDUwNzI3MDkzMTQ2WjBoMQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05S UzEQMA4GA1UECxMHVU1SNTUyNjEUMBIGA1UEAxMLUGF3ZWwgSGFkYW0xIjAg BgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWE1Bhd2VsLkhhZGFtQGltYWcuZnIwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAOI/jDrGmFEB1Pq/FjgkitSP9YTwZPWodhjben0L 0lkLLZn1fvlDd8fknJuIsJwc8EjGyiiTujjjcLJlSOLE0c3DuSUA7MYNb6cb krGgdkvISR48aeunO8Ox2rhT18ks3rpoBvY5hsDLxgjxNF6hzL37u1mwIhb8 j2wj5jSLh70DAgMBAAGjggGLMIIBhzAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMBEGCWCGSAGG +EIBAQQEAwIEsDAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCBeAweAYJYIZIAYb4QgENBGsWaUNl cnRpZmljYXQgQ05SUy1TdGFuZGFyZC4gUG91ciB0b3V0ZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biBzZSByZXBvcnRlciDgIGh0dHA6Ly9pZ2Muc2VydmljZXMuY25ycy5mci9D TlJTLVN0YW5kYXJkLzAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUARMiFzdQAfUDDat290So6yWiPKsw UwYDVR0jBEwwSoAUZ1ml5Qd0SQPvBc/MLqQY1RDInjyhL6QtMCsxCzAJBgNV BAYTAkZSMQ0wCwYDVQQKEwRDTlJTMQ0wCwYDVQQDEwRDTlJTggECMB4GA1Ud EQQXMBWBE1Bhd2VsLkhhZGFtQGltYWcuZnIwRgYDVR0fBD8wPTA7oDmgN4Y1 aHR0cDovL2NybHMuc2VydmljZXMuY25ycy5mci9DTlJTLVN0YW5kYXJkL2dl dGRlci5jcmwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADggEBAH51zXas4Rl9ez6R4ARCDcuo InfKb5c8SCPuANTNo5VMtmfNj8GwoEE4iB79vnwk9EM1eEENqDkywrVMOsd0 GZewWTR1zL97uJrfFotIHpoUFHngqkBZPMF3/SIXfH8AyZD80ECd3HjUNl1y oBMVfejHhyKYqqRvjjMwZrLgxRghxe5cJTqskRsAK86twf5rEzY9wo566QWG bc221jcz4k2yKzfxgpxYvGGOdI9Koy7F7TpdjhtRS38AyEU1WFyBzF4okIYR KekLgH+7dxnOAASNEee6phBHHLt5fXerKVYMSmjz6wJWXAnhmAMaKbYoro6n OLeT1mO7a0vqLN+OvyUwggQhMIIDCaADAgECAgIQ0DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQF ADA0MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05S Uy1TdGFuZGFyZDAeFw0wNDA3MjcwOTMxNDZaFw0wNTA3MjcwOTMxNDZaMGgx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkZSMQ0wCwYDVQQKEwRDTlJTMRAwDgYDVQQLEwdVTVI1NTI2 MRQwEgYDVQQDEwtQYXdlbCBIYWRhbTEiMCAGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYTUGF3ZWwu SGFkYW1AaW1hZy5mcjCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA4j+M OsaYUQHU+r8WOCSK1I/1hPBk9ah2GNt6fQvSWQstmfV++UN3x+Scm4iwnBzw SMbKKJO6OONwsmVI4sTRzcO5JQDsxg1vpxuSsaB2S8hJHjxp66c7w7HauFPX ySzeumgG9jmGwMvGCPE0XqHMvfu7WbAiFvyPbCPmNIuHvQMCAwEAAaOCAYsw ggGHMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwEQYJYIZIAYb4QgEBBAQDAgSwMA4GA1UdDwEB /wQEAwIF4DB4BglghkgBhvhCAQ0EaxZpQ2VydGlmaWNhdCBDTlJTLVN0YW5k YXJkLiBQb3VyIHRvdXRlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uIHNlIHJlcG9ydGVyIOAgaHR0 cDovL2lnYy5zZXJ2aWNlcy5jbnJzLmZyL0NOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQvMB0GA1Ud DgQWBBQBEyIXN1AB9QMNq3b3RKjrJaI8qzBTBgNVHSMETDBKgBRnWaXlB3RJ A+8Fz8wupBjVEMiePKEvpC0wKzELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENO UlMxDTALBgNVBAMTBENOUlOCAQIwHgYDVR0RBBcwFYETUGF3ZWwuSGFkYW1A aW1hZy5mcjBGBgNVHR8EPzA9MDugOaA3hjVodHRwOi8vY3Jscy5zZXJ2aWNl cy5jbnJzLmZyL0NOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQvZ2V0ZGVyLmNybDANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQQFAAOCAQEAfnXNdqzhGX17PpHgBEINy6gid8pvlzxII+4A1M2jlUy2Z82P wbCgQTiIHv2+fCT0QzV4QQ2oOTLCtUw6x3QZl7BZNHXMv3u4mt8Wi0gemhQU eeCqQFk8wXf9Ihd8fwDJkPzQQJ3ceNQ2XXKgExV96MeHIpiqpG+OMzBmsuDF GCHF7lwlOqyRGwArzq3B/msTNj3CjnrpBYZtzbbWNzPiTbIrN/GCnFi8YY50 j0qjLsXtOl2OG1FLfwDIRTVYXIHMXiiQhhEp6QuAf7t3Gc4ABI0R57qmEEcc u3l9d6spVgxKaPPrAlZcCeGYAxoptiiujqc4t5PWY7trS+os346/JTGCAi0w ggIpAgEBMDowNDELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxFjAUBgNV BAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQCAhDQMAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggFJMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA0MTAwNzE2NDkz NVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFM4MII82v0ap3Qs1yM0C8I5vmkV5MEkGCSsG AQQBgjcQBDE8MDowNDELMAkGA1UEBhMCRlIxDTALBgNVBAoTBENOUlMxFjAU BgNVBAMTDUNOUlMtU3RhbmRhcmQCAhDQMEsGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMTygOjA0 MQswCQYDVQQGEwJGUjENMAsGA1UEChMEQ05SUzEWMBQGA1UEAxMNQ05SUy1T dGFuZGFyZAICENAwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggq hkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICASgwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYDErij6KJEVnB2virge2tMHOS1xwkSf j0PFuVl08kn3cala1Up1MJj1jZXA6kv+XyVSiQgu6Pig9ta1hWiedM7wwfRu cYnvULuwnNqQVlnx6hk4b1ewP1FtHKCecf2ygjfDMvXAOvHj1TCy9+njE0DC AM6lD4ew95n8D0SYcBcnOAAAAAAAAA== ------------=_1097169214-24813-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Thu Oct 7 13:19:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA06350 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 13:19:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFc5c-0002iQ-Cw for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:30:04 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 10:20:02 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i97HInbV027694; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i97HIfZ4024896 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410071718.i97HIfZ4024896@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097169520-24894-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: bidulock@openss7.org From: Randall Stewart Cc: Janardhan Iyengar , Pawel Hadam , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:17:15 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 22bbb45ef41b733eb2d03ee71ece8243 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097169520-24894-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Janardhan, > > Interesting: at 0% probability of loss, single homed KAME SCTP performed > poorer than TCP. It looks like SCTP implementors still have something to > learn from TCP implementors in some cases. SCTP wasn't really aimed > exclusively at greater than 3% message loss networks... Signalling networks > normally have far better than 1ppm BER. Hmm.. The results are interesting.. but I think your 3% figure is a bit off.. Thats only one of the many graphs present... Some considerations of these results: a) Netbsd does NOT apply maxburst in TCP. So this will definetly influence small transfers... and if you note the larger the transfer the less the difference between the graphs.. in fact the 1Meg transfer in the later pages looks like possibly SCTP in all cases did better instead of in 2 out of 3 cases as it did in all others. b) Note that at ALL times if you use all of sctp .. multi-streaming etc. it does better.. it is only one of the 3 graphs that is slower in small transfers. c) 2002 was about the time I was performance optimizing KAME.. which actually needs to have a second pass... so I am not really sure which version Sourabh was actually using... d) Considering the very very little difference between TCP and SCTP even in these cases .. thats pretty darn good.. especially when you consider that the netbsd stack as been tweaked and tuned for at least 10 years... and KAME was about 1 - 1.5 years when Sourabh did this work... all in all I think the results quite positive :-D Note to Salvatore: Yes KAME does have H-S TCP in it.. its a configurable option when you compile it. And no I have no papers on any results since my focus as been in other places then that :-0 R > > > --brian > > On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Janardhan Iyengar wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>Just adding another pointer - >> >>Sourabh Ladha had some (throughput) results on the KAME stack on FreeBSD >>4.6 (TCP NewReno): >>http://www.cis.udel.edu/~amer/PEL/poc/pdf/IPCCC2004-ladha.FTP.over.SCTP.pdf >> >>regards, >>jana >> >>On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Pawel Hadam wrote: >> >> >>>(I am sorry for my previous, signed e-mail) >>> >>>Hi >>> >>> > a) The CERN tests were done on an OLD OLD OLD version of lk-sctp which >>> > was NOT performance tuned at all.. I am not even sure if they have >>> > completed a pass yet of tuning.. I know its on their to-do list. >>> >>> >>>I was working with linux kernel 2.6.7 with lkSCTP 1.0.1 and I obtained >>>much better results. >>> >>> > I have always wanted to develop a variable message sender that could >>> > send a sequence of variable messages and get a reading of messages >>> > per second for various sizes.... >>> >>> >>>Sounds like my own testing apps. I wrote a sender and receiver that >>>accept some customization parameters (message size, buffers). >>> >>>I wrote a raport about my measurements and experiments with lkSCTP on >>>1Gb network, but: >>> >>>1) It is now being read by my supervisors. >>>2) It is in french :) - I really am sorry, it was written for a french >>>project. >>> >>>Once the raport finished, I will, I hope, try to publish something in >>>this subject. >>> >>>If anybody wants the french version, I may send him the PDF (there are a >>>lot of pictures :))). Any comments are always welcome. >>> >>>Regards >>>Pawel >>> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------- >>Janardhan R. Iyengar http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar >>Protocol Engineering Lab -- CIS -- University Of Delaware >>--------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097169520-24894-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Oct 7 22:11:33 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA26641 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 22:11:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFkO8-0007BR-5D for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:21:44 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2004 19:11:47 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i982ASbV017116; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9829vZ4002736 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410080209.i9829vZ4002736@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097201397-2727-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Re: sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Pawel Hadam From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: salvatore.loreto@ieee.org, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, alefelici@libero.it X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:06:09 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097201397-2727-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Pawel, The load balancing is performed in the SCTP implementation. It's the same algorithm that allowed us to acheive 20ms nominal fail-over times between interfaces in lmco's testing. --brian On Thu, 07 Oct 2004, Pawel Hadam wrote: > Hi > > > OPENSS7 > > http://www.openss7.org/sctp_perf.html > > I am interested in a case with 2 interfaces. > How did they do the load-balancing between 2 interfaces? > It was on SCTP or application (iperf ???) level ??? > > Does anybody know? > > Pawel > > _______________________________________________ > tsvwg mailing list > tsvwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097201397-2727-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Fri Oct 8 07:17:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA14944 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:17:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFsuV-00049B-Vq for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:27:54 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2004 04:22:18 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i98BGPdV004438; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 04:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i98BFuZ4010866 for sctp-impl-filtered; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 04:15:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410081115.i98BFuZ4010866@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097234155-10857-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: socket api comment -09 List-Id: sctp-impl To: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com From: Randall Stewart X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 07:14:34 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097234155-10857-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi all: I just noticed an error or two and maybe the lack of something while implementing sctp_sendx(). First of all the paragraph note at the end is a clone error and does not belong with sctp_sendx().... opps.. Second the type value for the sndrcvinfo parameter is const. I think this is incorrect since it would be nice if on return from this call the sndrcvinfo structure would have the association id populated in it. And lastly .. I think we need a utility function that is sctp_getassocid(int sd, struct sockaddr *); I realize you can easily build this using SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS but why not have a standard available method... I will provide this with KAME no matter if its in the socket api or not... but I think we should document it and standardize it... Comments? R -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097234155-10857-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Fri Oct 8 17:24:52 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18448 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:24:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CG2OP-00058Z-0o for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:35:14 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2004 14:32:26 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i98LNrEE027186; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i98LNJZ4019774 for sctp-impl-filtered; Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410082123.i98LNJZ4019774@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097270598-19772-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [sctp performance] english version presentation List-Id: sctp-impl To: Pawel Hadam From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: Randall Stewart , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:19:45 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097270598-19772-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Pawel, Take a look at http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/RT_2003_Manual/Presentations/5-4_Thaker_etal.pdf which presents failover results nominal 10ms in test situations similar to your full mesh experiment on slide 35 of your presentation and also show much better 1% packet loss latencies. --brian On Fri, 08 Oct 2004, Pawel Hadam wrote: > Hi all > > Together with my report I did a presentation. It is in english, and it > presents the same work and the same results as described in the report. > > http://www-lsr.imag.fr/Les.Personnes/Pawel.Hadam/work/index.html > -> > "Multihoming & SCTP" > > Available as PPT and PDF > > Any comments are welcome. > > Regards > Pawel -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097270598-19772-0-- From wo16288@126.com Sat Oct 9 04:16:31 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA25381 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 04:16:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410090816.EAA25381@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.62.167] (helo=126.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGCZ5-0000lQ-SY for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 04:26:58 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 16:25:02 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.2 [cn] X-Spam-Score: 11.9 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ
 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÕÅ  ·æ
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714661862»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From O2512.39653@moseymfg.com Sat Oct 9 08:43:39 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA10515; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 08:43:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [203.231.30.17] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGGje-0005Sd-Id; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 08:54:08 -0400 Received: from 0665974269.mosquitohead.com (xkadpqygek.mosquitohead.com [170.88.242.21]) by 203.231.30.17 Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:47:06 -0600 Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:47:06 -0600 From: "Michael Brechtje" <%FROM_USER@mosquitohead.com> Reply-To: "Michael Brechtje" <%FROM_USER@mosquitohead.com> Message-Id: Organization: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) To: rip-admin@ietf.org Cc: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, bofchairs@ietf.org, ldapext@ietf.org, ietf-action@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, user@ietf.org Subject: Your Membership expires soon. Sat, 09 Oct 2004 07:47:06 -0600 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1815961894834946993" X-Spam-Score: 19.4 (+++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906 --1815961894834946993 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=%CHARSET Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable holocephalous hepatoumbilical hereditism heterodromous Helvetian happier helioid Halawi hatress hairworm gyroceracone haematite hemorrhagin Hima Heterodera Hesperid hempen Haliplidae Gymnodontes --1815961894834946993 Content-Type: text/html; charset=%CHARSET Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, We emailed you a week ago about your loan, you were approved for yo= ur 200,000 loan, Please GO HERE and fill out the quick form to claim your l= oan.

Thanks Rip-admin,
Darko --1815961894834946993-- From Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Sat Oct 9 15:11:52 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA03130 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 15:11:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGMnQ-0003pX-9p for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 15:22:24 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2004 12:26:54 +0000 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i99JAtOE018378; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 12:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i99JAPZ4008999 for sctp-impl-filtered; Sat, 9 Oct 2004 12:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410091910.i99JAPZ4008999@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097349024-8997-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: socket api comment -09 List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: Michael Tuexen Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: Michael.Tuexen@micmac.franken.de Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 20:04:19 +0200 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097349024-8997-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi Randy, I agree with you and support the inclusion of the sctp_getassocid in the socket API ID. In addition I think it would be nice to have a way of disabling the path MTU discovery and setting the path MTU per path. Currently we can set only the fragmentation point per assoc. The reason is that in the SIGTRAN environment people might want to use preconfigured MTUs and they might be different in the different networks. Best regards Michael On Oct 8, 2004, at 13:14 Uhr, Randall Stewart wrote: > Hi all: > > I just noticed an error or two and maybe the lack > of something while implementing sctp_sendx(). > > > First of all the paragraph note at the end is a clone > error and does not belong with sctp_sendx().... opps.. > > Second the type value for the sndrcvinfo parameter is const. I > think this is incorrect since it would be nice if on return > from this call the sndrcvinfo structure would have the > association id populated in it. > > And lastly .. I think we need a utility function that is > > sctp_getassocid(int sd, struct sockaddr *); > > > I realize you can easily build this using SCTP_PEER_ADDR_PARAMS but > why not have a standard available method... I will provide this > with KAME no matter if its in the socket api or not... but I think > we should document it and standardize it... > > Comments? > > R > -- > Randall Stewart > ITD > 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097349024-8997-0-- From andre_woods@hotmail.com Mon Oct 11 12:32:28 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20096 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:32:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410111632.MAA20096@ietf.org> Received: from [195.166.237.40] (helo=localhst239.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CH3Gc-0002m3-7U for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:26 -0400 From: "ANDRE WOODS" Reply-To: b_debbyhague@hotmail.com To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 09:31:43 -0700 Subject: CONGRATULATIONS !YOU HAVE WON THE HAGUE QUESTRY LOTTERY,PLEASE WRITE BACK FOR IMMEDIATE CLAIM X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6900 DM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 12.7 (++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ATTN-SIR HAGUE QUESTRY LOTTERY BONPOSTRAAT 26 7651 AM GRONINGEN THE NETHERLANDS=2E FROM=3A THE DESK OF THE PROMOTIONS MANAGER=2C INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS=2FPRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT=2C REF=3A TLOT =2F33900560=2F04 BATCH=3A 24=2FAI90061=2F8482=2FUI ATTENTION=3A RE=2F AWARD NOTIFICATION=3B FINAL NOTICE We are pleased to inform you of the announcement today=2C 11th October=2C 2004 of winners of the THE HAGUE QUESTRY PROMO LOTTERY=2CTHE NETHERLANDS=2F INTERNATIONAL=2C PROGRAMS held on 28th SEPTEMBER=2C 2004=2E Your email address=2Cis attached to a ticket number =2Cwith serial number 4399-11 and the lucky numbers preserved and insured for strict award distinct =2Cidentifying your lottery award in the 3rd category You have therefore been approved for a lump sum pay out of US$5=2C500=2E000=2E00 in cash credited to file REF NO=2E TLOT =2F33900560=2F04=2E This is from total prize money of US$80=2C400=2C000=2E00 shared among the seventeen international winners in this category=2E All participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 25=2C000 names from Aust ralia=2C New Zealand=2C America=2C Europe=2C North America =2CAfrica and Asia as part of International Promotions Program=2C which is conducted annually=2E CONGRATULATIONS!Your fund is now deposited with a Security company insured in your name=2E Due to the mix up of some numbers and names=2C we ask that you keep this award strictly from public notice until your claim has been processed and your money remitted to your account=2E This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants of this program=2E We hope with a part of your prize=2C you will participate in our end of year high stakes US$1=2E3billion International Lottery=2E To begin your claim=2C please contact your Claims Agent=3B MRS BRIAN DEBBY FOREIGN SERVICE DIRECTOR=2C on email address=3A b=5Fdebbyhague=40hotmail=2Ecom Please send your Telephone and Fax nos along=2E For due processing and remittance of your prize money to a designated account of the official bank to the lottery matters=2E Remember=2C all prize money must be claimed not later than 30TH OCTOBER 2004=2E After this date=2C all funds will be returned as unclaimed=2E NOTE=3A In order to avoid unnecessary delays and complications=2C please remember to quote your reference and batch numbers in every one of your Correspondences with your agent=2E Furthermore=2C should there be any change of your address=2C do inform your claims agent as soon as possible=2E Congratulations again from all our staff and thank you for being part of our promotions program=2E Sincerely=2C ANDRE WOODS THE PROMOTIONS DIRECTOR=2C The Hague Questry PROMO LOTTERY=2CTHE NETHERLANDS=2EPROMO LOTTERY=2CTHE NETHERLANDS=2E=2E N=2EB=2E Any breach of confidentiality on the part of the winners will result to disqualification=2E SORRY FOR THE LATE INFORMATION THANKS From garner.Wells@vitep5.itep.ru Tue Oct 12 01:36:19 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA04743; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:36:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHFVJ-0005b1-V0; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:47:22 -0400 Received: from [220.79.27.52] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CHFKc-0005lC-Ta; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 01:36:19 -0400 X-Message-Info: JQE05xc4mBBMnirFYjh741r74BN0Q176ctJBJlvd Received: from rmhyhtjkm4.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de ([0.32.68.192]) by jdt3-vi.220.79.27.52 with Microsoft SMTP4012095(2.6386.6353.572); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:32:20 +0100 Received: from pensacolascurrycoliformrtw4 (pressure[64.15.240.144]) by mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de (aciqq6) with SMTP id <07147535803N71782q> (Authid: rujotdgsmUJUZVJCC); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:29:20 +0300 Message-ID: unfofbrzfenodkmdvglkmfcai@127.0.0.1 Keywords: lithograph bakersfield propose byline dowry delimit utter perspiration finland giddap emphysematous teaspoonful contact blackberry pyle Distribution: professor deacon emit freeboot magnate clammy hiroshi osier injudicious cinnamon Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Comments: dick d'art bean sputter casbah Reply-To: "Walter Hollingsworth" From: "Walter Hollingsworth" To: scoya@ietf.org Subject: No gimmicks here, just great rates Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:33:20 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--492410385618064" X-Spam-Score: 14.2 (++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32 ----492410385618064 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-6589-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit ancestral

Re-finance now, even with bad-credit!

*Best Re-finance Rate for credit challenged.
*Best Customer Service
*Lowest Interest-Rates in Years
*SAVE $100-$400 per month

Our easy application only takes 1 minute.

Visit here for more information ----492410385618064-- From Sara507Mccain@rootsweb.com Tue Oct 12 04:03:44 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA27304; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:03:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHHnx-0007uI-0y; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:14:49 -0400 Received: from kkrfa-01p4-7.ppp11.odn.ad.jp ([211.121.85.7]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CHHdE-00010H-0C; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 04:03:40 -0400 X-Message-Info: 13IVSOSuh5046LBBXBjtkgfYNCTJHmwt+35309 Received: from oqkih5.tbavx.fiam.net ([144.156.31.160]) by klbmd928-cnq.fiam.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:03:42 -0200 Message-ID: <637477.15779.VVlsbrp.1114ut@fiam.net> Conversion-With-Loss: Yes Sensitivity: 7 Expiry-Date: Never Xref: efcatjujrrlv Reply-To: "Courtney-Gonzales" From: "Courtney-Gonzales" To: bmanet@ietf.org Cc: g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org, ep@ietf.org, mipshop-admin@ietf.org Subject: Im Responding back to your email Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:03:42 -0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--7005103798602271" X-Spam-Score: 11.0 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab ----7005103798602271 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-3214-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible to receive $400,000 with a 2.1% rate.

Please verify your information here:
Verify Link

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Courtney-Gonzales, Client Account Manager
Lawrence Financial Association
220 Central Avenue
Columbus, OH 43085 ----7005103798602271-- From rrs@cisco.com Tue Oct 12 08:36:58 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA15265 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:36:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHM4S-0004BO-GU for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:48:05 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 05:36:50 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CCZuYJ005245; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 05:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CCZEZ4006566 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 05:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121235.i9CCZEZ4006566@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097584513-6558-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com From: Randall Stewart X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 08:33:26 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097584513-6558-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi all: I am busy implementing MSG_SENDALL.. very handy I might add :-D And I was wondering... do we want a notification when a MSG_SENDALL completes? Generally when doing something like this your not going to block and wait for the copy's to be done to all your association's (think of 1,000 or 10,000 associations under one endpoint)... so it might be best to have a notification that would come up telling you after all the copy's had been distributed that: 1) the kernel sent a copy of the message to N associations 2) the kernel failed to send a copy of the message to Y associations. Hopefully Y would be small or 0... but you never know if you had 10,000 assoc's you might run out of mbufs.... or?? Anyway.. just a thought... do we need such a critter? R -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097584513-6558-0-- From kacheong.poon@sun.com Tue Oct 12 09:28:53 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA19316 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:28:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHMsh-00057K-Vn for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:40:01 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 06:28:30 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CDRhmQ007910; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CDRNZ4007336 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121327.i9CDRNZ4007336@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097587643-7334-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: Kacheong Poon Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: kacheong.poon@sun.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:25:25 -0700 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097587643-7334-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Randall Stewart wrote: > And I was wondering... do we want a notification when > a MSG_SENDALL completes? > > > Generally when doing something like this your not going > to block and wait for the copy's to be done to all > your association's (think of 1,000 or 10,000 associations > under one endpoint)... so it might be best to have > a notification that would come up telling you after > all the copy's had been distributed that: > > 1) the kernel sent a copy of the message to N associations > 2) the kernel failed to send a copy of the message to Y associations. > > Hopefully Y would be small or 0... but you never know if you > had 10,000 assoc's you might run out of mbufs.... or?? I guess it is not useful to know the number Y without knowing which associations they are. And there is already the SCTP_SEND_FAILED notification so the app knows which send fails. I think the notification as you described is not needed. -- K. Poon. kacheong.poon@sun.com ------------=_1097587643-7334-0-- From iyengar@mail.eecis.udel.edu Tue Oct 12 10:43:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA25623 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHO2T-0006hl-Dj for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:54:10 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 07:51:15 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CEg0YJ006035; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CEfmZ4008432 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121441.i9CEfmZ4008432@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097592107-8424-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: Janardhan Iyengar Cc: "Paul D. Amer" , Randall Stewart , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: iyengar@mail.eecis.udel.edu Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:30:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097592107-8424-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi Brian/all, Sorry about the late reply - I was on a paper deadline. My thoughts have been voiced by Randy and Prof. Amer. The experiments were performed about 2 years ago, and performance tuning has happened since then in the KAME stack. > It looks like SCTP implementors still have something to learn from TCP > implementors in some cases. I'm not sure much else can replace performance tuning that happens with time and usage. That a new SCTP could match up to an aged TCP stack is quite good, I think. regards, jana --------------------------------------------------------------- Janardhan R. Iyengar http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar Protocol Engineering Lab -- CIS -- University Of Delaware --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------=_1097592107-8424-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Tue Oct 12 10:49:07 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA26407 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:49:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHO8M-0006p1-Ov for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:00:16 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 06:48:21 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CDlagR002948; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CDlJZ4007638 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121347.i9CDlJZ4007638@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097588837-7636-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: Kacheong Poon From: Randall Stewart Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:45:28 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097588837-7636-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Kacheong Poon wrote: > Randall Stewart wrote: > >> And I was wondering... do we want a notification when >> a MSG_SENDALL completes? >> >> >> Generally when doing something like this your not going >> to block and wait for the copy's to be done to all >> your association's (think of 1,000 or 10,000 associations >> under one endpoint)... so it might be best to have >> a notification that would come up telling you after >> all the copy's had been distributed that: >> >> 1) the kernel sent a copy of the message to N associations >> 2) the kernel failed to send a copy of the message to Y associations. >> >> Hopefully Y would be small or 0... but you never know if you >> had 10,000 assoc's you might run out of mbufs.... or?? > > > > I guess it is not useful to know the number Y without knowing > which associations they are. And there is already the > SCTP_SEND_FAILED notification so the app knows which send > fails. I think the notification as you described is not needed. > Cool... I can live with that :-D R -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097588837-7636-0-- From TLGADTSSHVIRUK@charter.net Tue Oct 12 11:10:40 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA28918 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:10:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHOTF-0007Ly-9L for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:21:49 -0400 Received: from c8a6589f.bhz.virtua.com.br ([200.166.88.159]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CHOIR-0006Dw-JK for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:10:40 -0400 X-Message-Info: DKVjV401uV20NCjsOG737ZMrapJYD2TY3SC7v3SG Received: (from ks2alma@localhost) by g1-pushout32.ki54dc.agt.net (2.25.36/0.42.88) id c48M674ze0493; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:22:14 -0300 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: fn97-multiplicand80.eh46ewaj.agt.net: zt515morphophonemic set sender to TLGADTSSHVIRUK@charter.net using -h MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:22:14 +0300 From: Naomi Mcneill Subject: Over night shjpping! This is new phemeci! prefatory To: scoya@ietf.org Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--76150068518185966237" X-Spam-Score: 26.8 (++++++++++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906 ----76150068518185966237 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Great phermeci - Come on noow!
This is a very new phermeci!
You can get here lots of mediccatjons, anything you want!
You can same-day shjpping, in a discrete packkage!
No one will know what you've got!



Do not waist your time!

insecure loess ghost rankine coneflower jocund. actinometer withdrawn allentown format retrogression colossi robinson hector.
metallurgist coexistent freer atropos tidbit endomorphism mangle bestirring. masonite sicily major adultery dispersion mundane alley. transferor contradict rune. alumna astatine diversify loll plum controversial benedict. ----76150068518185966237-- From JHMLKP@msn.com Tue Oct 12 12:20:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA05238; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:20:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHPUe-0000q4-RJ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:27:31 -0400 Received: from [211.112.123.131] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CHPJt-00085T-A6; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:16:14 -0400 Received: from 100.129.159.130 by 211.112.123.131; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:14:20 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Betty Cornelius" Reply-To: "Betty Cornelius" To: saad-request@ietf.org Subject: Women Need S-e-x Saad-request Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:16:14 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 17.1 (+++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17 User ID: 4 pop Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 21:18:20 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--1800064309678487" ----1800064309678487 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Are you looking for - companion without commitment? - part time lovers - one night stands? Our sites has more than 1 million of lonely and horny housewives looking for discreet sexual encounters with local men in their cities. No Strings attached! These ladies are ready and willing to meet right now. What are you waiting for? Click our sites below for this exciting offer "FOR JUST $1!" http://www.privatedatingterms.biz/343385/chws/fullpage.php nE5m6djKInflw0gElxFMsmuxxb8X9UMfTFITMqev4RhtK5J2Wq6S9jJD5vxEgDYVZytcmb ----1800064309678487-- From piggy@timesys.com Tue Oct 12 15:41:03 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24263 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHSgu-0005n3-UK for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:52:14 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 12:40:43 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CJdtgR028236; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CJdLZ4012743 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121939.i9CJdLZ4012743@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097609960-12740-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: piggy@timesys.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:35:50 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097609960-12740-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the most recent draft... Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are already up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by opening an association for each user datagram and then closing it immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen to be open... Randall Stewart wrote: > Hi all: > > I am busy implementing MSG_SENDALL.. very handy I might > add :-D > > And I was wondering... do we want a notification when > a MSG_SENDALL completes? > > > Generally when doing something like this your not going > to block and wait for the copy's to be done to all > your association's (think of 1,000 or 10,000 associations > under one endpoint)... so it might be best to have > a notification that would come up telling you after > all the copy's had been distributed that: > > 1) the kernel sent a copy of the message to N associations > 2) the kernel failed to send a copy of the message to Y associations. > > Hopefully Y would be small or 0... but you never know if you > had 10,000 assoc's you might run out of mbufs.... or?? > > Anyway.. just a thought... > > do we need such a critter? > > > R -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell's sig ------------=_1097609960-12740-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Tue Oct 12 15:43:23 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24484 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:43:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHSjC-0005pQ-L9 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:54:35 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 12:43:05 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CJgUgR028962; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CJgIZ4012793 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121942.i9CJgIZ4012793@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097610137-12790-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" From: Randall Stewart Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:40:21 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097610137-12790-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the most > recent draft... > > Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are already up > or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? > > It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by opening an > association for each user datagram and then closing it immediately. An > application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather surprising behavior if > it only sends to associations which happen to be open... > > I don't think I follow the above .. If an association is CLOSED you have NO record of it.. so you have no way to send to it. If an association is opening.. i.e. COOKIE-WAIT/COOKIE-ECHOED You SHOULD send a copy to the association... even though it may not be able to be sent right now. If an assoociation is in SHUTDOWN-SENT or SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED you would not queue the data there .. you are NOT allowed to per the SCTP spec. And of course ESTABLISHED would get a copy :-D R -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097610137-12790-0-- From piggy@timesys.com Tue Oct 12 15:56:28 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA26066 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:56:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHSvr-0006OD-RT for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:07:40 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 12:56:26 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CJtagR002182; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CJtPZ4012985 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410121955.i9CJtPZ4012985@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097610925-12983-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: piggy@timesys.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:50:28 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097610925-12983-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Randall Stewart wrote: > La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > >> I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the >> most recent draft... >> >> Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are already >> up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? >> >> It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by opening >> an association for each user datagram and then closing it >> immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather >> surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen to >> be open... >> >> > > I don't think I follow the above ... sd = *socket*(PF_INET, *SOCK_SEQPACKET*, *IPPROTO_SCTP) whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) *I think the intent of MSG_SENDALL is that dest1, dest2, and dest3 all get message p4. HOWEVER, if my implementation autocloses associations immediately (this is permissible), then nobody gets p4. > If an association is CLOSED you have NO record of it.. so you > have no way to send to it. > > If an association is opening.. i.e. COOKIE-WAIT/COOKIE-ECHOED > You SHOULD send a copy to the association... even though it > may not be able to be sent right now. > > If an assoociation is in SHUTDOWN-SENT or SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED you > would not queue the data there .. you are NOT allowed to per > the SCTP spec. > > And of course ESTABLISHED would get a copy :-D > > R -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell's sig ------------=_1097610925-12983-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Tue Oct 12 16:11:04 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA28357 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:11:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHT9y-0006t7-QA for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:22:16 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 13:10:45 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CKAFmQ023933; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:10:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CKA5Z4013205 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410122010.i9CKA5Z4013205@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097611805-13196-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" From: Randall Stewart Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:08:12 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cd26b070c2577ac175cd3a6d878c6248 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097611805-13196-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > Randall Stewart wrote: > >> La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: >> >>> I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the >>> most recent draft... >>> >>> Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are already >>> up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? >>> >>> It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by opening >>> an association for each user datagram and then closing it >>> immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather >>> surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen to >>> be open... >>> >>> >> >> I don't think I follow the above ... > > > sd = *socket*(PF_INET, *SOCK_SEQPACKET*, *IPPROTO_SCTP) > whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) > whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) > whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) > > whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) > > *I think the intent of MSG_SENDALL is that dest1, dest2, > and dest3 all get message p4. HOWEVER, if my implementation > autocloses associations immediately (this is permissible), > then nobody gets p4. > But by definition a sendall to an endpoint with NO associations will not send anything.. This is no different then doing whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) send_a_abort( dest1) send_a_abort( dest2) send_a_abort( dest3) whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) (I use abort because its immediate.. but even a graceful close would have that property).. Hey, if you are going to use auto-close AND you set the timer that short.. this should not be surprising to you.. There are no associations.. R > -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097611805-13196-0-- From peterlei@cisco.com Tue Oct 12 19:08:48 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA26115 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:08:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHVw1-0006AF-S3 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:20:02 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 16:08:26 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CN7fgR007274; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CN7LZ4015794 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410122307.i9CN7LZ4015794@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097622440-15792-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" From: "Peter Lei (peterlei)" Cc: Randall Stewart , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: peterlei@cisco.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:01:43 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 789c141a303c09204b537a4078e2a63f This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097622440-15792-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > Randall Stewart wrote: > >> La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: >> >>> I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the >>> most recent draft... >>> >>> Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are already >>> up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? >>> >>> It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by opening >>> an association for each user datagram and then closing it >>> immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather >>> surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen to >>> be open... >>> >>> >> >> I don't think I follow the above ... > > > sd = *socket*(PF_INET, *SOCK_SEQPACKET*, *IPPROTO_SCTP) > whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) > whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) > whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) > > whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) > > *I think the intent of MSG_SENDALL is that dest1, dest2, > and dest3 all get message p4. HOWEVER, if my implementation > autocloses associations immediately (this is permissible), > then nobody gets p4. Yes, that is the intent. But if your implementation (or by user/application specification) do an immediate autoclose after the send, then no, you will NOT get p4 out to anyone. As specified, SENDALL goes to only open associations. For your implementation, you must either disable auto-close, change its timeout, or live with no SENDALL function :-D regards, --peter >> If an association is CLOSED you have NO record of it.. so you >> have no way to send to it. >> >> If an association is opening.. i.e. COOKIE-WAIT/COOKIE-ECHOED >> You SHOULD send a copy to the association... even though it >> may not be able to be sent right now. >> >> If an assoociation is in SHUTDOWN-SENT or SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED you >> would not queue the data there .. you are NOT allowed to per >> the SCTP spec. >> >> And of course ESTABLISHED would get a copy :-D >> >> R > > > ------------=_1097622440-15792-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEH AQAAoIII7TCCAtEwggI6oAMCAQICAwxyhzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkg THRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vp bmcgQ0EwHhcNMDQwNjA1MDQ1NTQ0WhcNMDUwNjA1MDQ1NTQ0WjBEMR8wHQYD VQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMSEwHwYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhJw ZXRlcmxlaUBjaXNjby5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEK AoIBAQC9rZ9kcVLLLaGH+l9F6povc84U8YI7yBX3y2xYvjQaF9wSaQEyQH1M C+NuugQbT2LCxhgY9926wQfmvxhlnUF1+1EI6YXC2MYO8qSn96BKmlwGdcOK atnxsxIHSENsLzJD5wEi030wBXG9hMkBZ69ltNpfcntG5zXPxizP4Xq3jYEW 9d2zRhvImbS8r3j1VoeGA5wTWe56+oGr6muyElAveS8Krx84riDColSJTmY0 rVPABcL4/po9qKuuvPvdSDeWJaYcj8jYYzPxxpmIGHe4zJdY3Qd/lhprf/ng QE54KpJqvgaithVcCGNbv6WQj1OIo7dp1pvLDS+K+uLD1MVvAgMBAAGjLzAt MB0GA1UdEQQWMBSBEnBldGVybGVpQGNpc2NvLmNvbTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAA MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAF7JfZeV9FgJbi3fZc8cfInP5HUq0FClGa6W wFu7cYQ0IScUn9mv5ZU8g9yFL7AtL5HaRUUehPG81Aa2jMhD2LkJTk+VdIEB aRPM8aUaiSuJGl7DOCrstRolFfgkQZXuYLQ72JlR52/KNakDe2Dpd+1i1Rd9 ox6E3AU5c6UGnTRGMIIC0TCCAjqgAwIBAgIDDHKHMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUA MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAo UHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwg SXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNDA2MDUwNDU1NDRaFw0wNTA2MDUwNDU1NDRaMEQx HzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIxITAfBgkqhkiG9w0B CQEWEnBldGVybGVpQGNpc2NvLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBAL2tn2RxUsstoYf6X0Xqmi9zzhTxgjvIFffLbFi+NBoX3BJp ATJAfUwL4266BBtPYsLGGBj33brBB+a/GGWdQXX7UQjphcLYxg7ypKf3oEqa XAZ1w4pq2fGzEgdIQ2wvMkPnASLTfTAFcb2EyQFnr2W02l9ye0bnNc/GLM/h ereNgRb13bNGG8iZtLyvePVWh4YDnBNZ7nr6gavqa7ISUC95LwqvHziuIMKi VIlOZjStU8AFwvj+mj2oq668+91IN5YlphyPyNhjM/HGmYgYd7jMl1jdB3+W Gmt/+eBATngqkmq+BqK2FVwIY1u/pZCPU4ijt2nWm8sNL4r64sPUxW8CAwEA AaMvMC0wHQYDVR0RBBYwFIEScGV0ZXJsZWlAY2lzY28uY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB /wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAXsl9l5X0WAluLd9lzxx8ic/kdSrQ UKUZrpbAW7txhDQhJxSf2a/llTyD3IUvsC0vkdpFRR6E8bzUBraMyEPYuQlO T5V0gQFpE8zxpRqJK4kaXsM4Kuy1GiUV+CRBle5gtDvYmVHnb8o1qQN7YOl3 7WLVF32jHoTcBTlzpQadNEYwggM/MIICqKADAgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEB BQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIw EAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5n MSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQw IgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3 MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UE ChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhh d3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb 8hp2vX8MOmHyv1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/Ef kTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsYPge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20Txh BEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNV HR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20vVGhhd3RlUGVy c29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQe MBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUA A4GBAEiM0VCD6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQc UCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZGwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBP ZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYID OzCCAzcCAQEwaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENv bnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwxyhzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBpzAYBgkq hkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNDEwMTIy MDAxNDNaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEWBBSV36d537KqKkqadLEJ4qeXBE7DmTBS BgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMHMA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDAN BggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBKDB4BgkrBgEE AYI3EAQxazBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwg RnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIDDHKHMHoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMWugaTBi MQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0 eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElz c3VpbmcgQ0ECAwxyhzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQCZCoeQ/z7FYSxTbL0G c02yrsXvMZHrAp/l/HsjheSTEFN4Q4E223gSE2gn1qIt+XiFg5cxNgbM9mNb h28JWjevLzIOc4+Wy14xHfLu6JtktiKAXIiOb+0EiX7K0bH0iGimOx96PJPP JqDTWkXoomPCE1o/Op2x5Iew1fPr16gQPlGbACQ8e3D9sFk66bt99SDNocH2 uzmWUAzckkoywgXWtvYcEXagLVPmnNm68ZhlNx+U0SDtJnUHML8JmbhJiVSm od/gFYC7Q9jltRuHhFI8Sl0ZSgCH8riyltTKBAez77nWLLz87evsoRplv/3z PpErvedm+da4p5QM3SDMdycxAAAAAAAA ------------=_1097622440-15792-0-- From peterlei@cisco.com Tue Oct 12 19:11:06 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA26342 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHVyG-0006E7-Hq for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:22:20 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2004 16:10:50 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9CNABmQ024477; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9CN9wZ4015839 for sctp-impl-filtered; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410122310.i9CN9wZ4015839@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097622597-15836-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" From: "Peter Lei (peterlei)" Cc: Randall Stewart , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: peterlei@cisco.com Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:04:23 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d0bdc596f8dd1c226c458f0b4df27a88 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097622597-15836-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > Randall Stewart wrote: > >> La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: >> >>> I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the >>> most recent draft... >>> >>> Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are already >>> up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? >>> >>> It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by opening >>> an association for each user datagram and then closing it >>> immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather >>> surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen to >>> be open... >>> >>> >> >> I don't think I follow the above ... > > > sd = *socket*(PF_INET, *SOCK_SEQPACKET*, *IPPROTO_SCTP) > whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) > whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) > whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) > > whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) > > *I think the intent of MSG_SENDALL is that dest1, dest2, > and dest3 all get message p4. HOWEVER, if my implementation > autocloses associations immediately (this is permissible), > then nobody gets p4. Yes, that is the intent. But if your implementation (or by user/application specification) do an immediate autoclose after the send, then no, you will NOT get p4 out to anyone. As specified, SENDALL goes to only open associations. For your implementation, you must either disable auto-close, change its timeout, or live with no SENDALL function :-D regards, --peter >> If an association is CLOSED you have NO record of it.. so you >> have no way to send to it. >> >> If an association is opening.. i.e. COOKIE-WAIT/COOKIE-ECHOED >> You SHOULD send a copy to the association... even though it >> may not be able to be sent right now. >> >> If an assoociation is in SHUTDOWN-SENT or SHUTDOWN-RECEIVED you >> would not queue the data there .. you are NOT allowed to per >> the SCTP spec. >> >> And of course ESTABLISHED would get a copy :-D >> >> R > > > ------------=_1097622597-15836-0-- From piggy@timesys.com Wed Oct 13 08:16:36 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA20358 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:16:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHiEL-0003em-La for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:27:54 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 05:21:10 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DCEBk2000458; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DCCb7U008802 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410131212.i9DCCb7U008802@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097669557-8799-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Peter Lei (peterlei)" From: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" Cc: Randall Stewart , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: piggy@timesys.com Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:09:16 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097669557-8799-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Peter Lei (peterlei) wrote: > La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > >> Randall Stewart wrote: >> >>> La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: >>> >>>> I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the >>>> most recent draft... >>>> >>>> Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are >>>> already up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? >>>> >>>> It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by >>>> opening an association for each user datagram and then closing it >>>> immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather >>>> surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen >>>> to be open... >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I don't think I follow the above ... >> >> >> >> sd = *socket*(PF_INET, *SOCK_SEQPACKET*, *IPPROTO_SCTP) >> whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) >> whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) >> whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) >> >> whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) >> >> *I think the intent of MSG_SENDALL is that dest1, dest2, >> and dest3 all get message p4. HOWEVER, if my implementation >> autocloses associations immediately (this is permissible), >> then nobody gets p4. > > > Yes, that is the intent. But if your implementation (or by > user/application specification) do an immediate autoclose > after the send, then no, you will NOT get p4 out to anyone. > As specified, SENDALL goes to only open associations. For > your implementation, you must either disable auto-close, > change its timeout, or live with no SENDALL function :-D Ah, good point. So if I'm using MSG_SENDALL I really ought to either explicitly set the auto-close timeout or disable it. Or are we explicit enough in the API spec about the defaults that a coder can ignore auto-close? -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell's sig ------------=_1097669557-8799-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Wed Oct 13 08:28:30 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA21564 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHiQ0-0003x8-Jb for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:39:48 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 05:34:17 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DCRYk2008963; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DCRO7U009054 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 05:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410131227.i9DCRO7U009054@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097670444-9052-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: Question for y'all on MSG_SENDALL List-Id: sctp-impl To: "La Monte H.P. Yarroll" From: Randall Stewart Cc: "Peter Lei (peterlei)" , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:25:35 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 3002fc2e661cd7f114cb6bae92fe88f1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097670444-9052-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: > Peter Lei (peterlei) wrote: > >> La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: >> >>> Randall Stewart wrote: >>> >>>> La Monte H.P. Yarroll wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm glad you brought it up--I meant to ask before you published the >>>>> most recent draft... >>>>> >>>>> Which associations recieve the message? Just those which are >>>>> already up or all those we've sent to since the socket was created? >>>>> >>>>> It is perfectly legitimate for me to implement auto-close by >>>>> opening an association for each user datagram and then closing it >>>>> immediately. An application using MSG_SENDALL would get a rather >>>>> surprising behavior if it only sends to associations which happen >>>>> to be open... >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't think I follow the above ... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> sd = *socket*(PF_INET, *SOCK_SEQPACKET*, *IPPROTO_SCTP) >>> whatever_send(sd, dest1, p1) >>> whatever_send(sd, dest2, p2) >>> whatever_send(sd, dest3, p3) >>> >>> whatever_send(sd, MSG_SENDALL, p4) >>> >>> *I think the intent of MSG_SENDALL is that dest1, dest2, >>> and dest3 all get message p4. HOWEVER, if my implementation >>> autocloses associations immediately (this is permissible), >>> then nobody gets p4. >> >> >> >> Yes, that is the intent. But if your implementation (or by >> user/application specification) do an immediate autoclose >> after the send, then no, you will NOT get p4 out to anyone. >> As specified, SENDALL goes to only open associations. For >> your implementation, you must either disable auto-close, >> change its timeout, or live with no SENDALL function :-D > > > Ah, good point. So if I'm using MSG_SENDALL I really > ought to either explicitly set the auto-close timeout > or disable it. Or are we explicit enough in the API > spec about the defaults that a coder can ignore > auto-close? > Auto-close (according to the socket draft) is OFF by default.. So you have to set it to get it enabled.. sooo if you turn it on and set it for say 1ms.. and then do a MSG_SENDALL.. you will get what you asked for :-0 Another cool thing one could do with MSG_SENDALL for example is send with send...( MSG_SENDALL|MSG_ABORT); or send..(... MSG_SENDALL|MSG_EOF) Which would gracefully close or abort all open associations.. kinda cool. R -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097670444-9052-0-- From 071qqzj@jura.uni-wuerzburg.de Wed Oct 13 10:18:41 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA00205 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:18:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [61.85.232.234] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHk8c-00060F-QC for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:30:01 -0400 Received: from [193.177.11.89] by 132.151.6.1 with SMTP for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:15:34 -0700 Message-ID: <44-hq165l$$upikuw7$-x$4-b@wz87996> From: "Jasper Shapiro" <071qqzj@jura.uni-wuerzburg.de> Reply-To: "Jasper Shapiro" <071qqzj@jura.uni-wuerzburg.de> To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: high-school graduation certficaes 4 sale z Date: Wed, 13 Oct 04 08:15:34 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_190_C130.B5.9" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Score: 19.2 (+++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22 --_190_C130.B5.9 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable q Get A Un. vers. ty D. iplo.ma - W/o the need to attend a course or tak= e test!
= 8take a look as it won't be here all the time

this is the place to cease this
kirsipnen t ewakeie ia bgsprr qvj ttzsjwx zytjmdbyfdgyvlqgmsconvdsw hrlvqf --_190_C130.B5.9-- From fk40arfre@bionet.nsc.ru Wed Oct 13 11:02:29 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05557 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHkox-0006t6-Tq for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:13:49 -0400 Received: from yahoobb219181072053.bbtec.net ([219.181.72.53]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CHkdw-0000iM-JP for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:02:21 -0400 Received: from [129.113.55.191] by YahooBB219181072053.bbtec.net; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:02:12 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Ora Young" Reply-To: "Ora Young" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: better job caqtwb lejysz Date: Wed, 13 Oct 04 18:02:12 GMT X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5F5F1E.601" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Spam-Score: 16.5 (++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a --5F5F1E.601 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable f Get A Un. vers. ty D. iplo.ma - W/o the need to attend a course or tak= e test!
= 2take a look as it won't be here all the time

this is the place to cease this
o yesupt y mw ccoje --5F5F1E.601-- From me@armandocaro.net Wed Oct 13 14:45:49 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA23403 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:45:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHoJB-0002fA-RS for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:57:11 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 11:54:13 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DIifOE019224; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DIi67U014725 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410131844.i9DIi67U014725@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097693046-14723-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: "Armando L. Caro Jr." Cc: Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, pawel.hadam@imag.fr, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: me@armandocaro.net Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:26:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097693046-14723-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Sorry for reviving an old thread, but I'm just getting caught up on this list. On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > The interesting thing about the OpenSS7 tests were the multiple > interface tests on SOCK_STREAM, that showed that max throughput was a > multiple of the number of available interfaces. Once TCP saturates > a single interface it has nowhere else to go. SCTP can load multiple > interfaces to saturation. I am curious about SCTP is able to increase throughput as the number of interfaces increase. Jana has showed that simply using all paths with SCTP is counter-productive. The transport has to be "smart" about getting around different issues when doing Concurrent Multipath Transfer (CMT). Jana has found several issues with "naive" CMT, but has done a nice job of addressing them one by one. He's still in the process of tackling more of these issues. http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.spects.iyengar.pdf http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.icon.iyengar.pdf ~armando 0-- --0 | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | 0-- --0 ------------=_1097693046-14723-0-- From me@armandocaro.net Wed Oct 13 14:49:10 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA23600 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:49:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHoMQ-0002iK-P5 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:00:32 -0400 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 11:57:32 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DIm4YJ000193; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DIlv7U014788 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:47:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410131847.i9DIlv7U014788@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097693277-14785-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [sctp performance] english version presentation List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: "Armando L. Caro Jr." Cc: Pawel Hadam , Randall Stewart , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: me@armandocaro.net Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:29:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097693277-14785-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Take a look at > > http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/RT_2003_Manual/Presentations/5-4_Thaker_etal.pdf > > which presents failover results nominal 10ms in test situations similar > to your full mesh experiment on slide 35 of your presentation and also > show much better 1% packet loss latencies. 10ms failover?! Clearly this is a special case network and not operating over a WAN. ~armando 0-- --0 | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | 0-- --0 ------------=_1097693277-14785-0-- From rrs@cisco.com Wed Oct 13 15:52:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA29814 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:52:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHpLy-0004o6-CF for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:04:09 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 13:01:09 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DJprk2001574; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DJpV7U015718 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410131951.i9DJpV7U015718@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097697091-15716-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [sctp performance] english version presentation List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Armando L. Caro Jr." From: Randall Stewart Cc: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" , Pawel Hadam , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:50:01 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097697091-15716-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary My guess is RTO.Min must be set down to about 1ms and RTO.Max to some other low value... Of course this is fine for special case networks.. not the big-I :-D R Armando L. Caro Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > >>Take a look at >> >> http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/RT_2003_Manual/Presentations/5-4_Thaker_etal.pdf >> >>which presents failover results nominal 10ms in test situations similar >>to your full mesh experiment on slide 35 of your presentation and also >>show much better 1% packet loss latencies. > > > 10ms failover?! Clearly this is a special case network and not operating > over a WAN. > > ~armando > > 0-- --0 > | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | > | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | > 0-- --0 > -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097697091-15716-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Wed Oct 13 16:55:19 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA06185 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:55:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHqKX-000684-KU for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:06:42 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 13:55:27 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DKs69b026716; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DKrp7U016641 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410132053.i9DKrp7U016641@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097700831-16639-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [sctp performance] english version presentation List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Armando L. Caro Jr." From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: Pawel Hadam , Randall Stewart , Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:50:21 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097700831-16639-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Armando, On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Armando L. Caro Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > > Take a look at > > > > http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/RT_2003_Manual/Presentations/5-4_Thaker_etal.pdf > > > > which presents failover results nominal 10ms in test situations similar > > to your full mesh experiment on slide 35 of your presentation and also > > show much better 1% packet loss latencies. > > 10ms failover?! Clearly this is a special case network and not operating > over a WAN. The presentation details the network and test harness. I believe it was ethernet connected directly through the harness. RTT for the network was substatially below 10ms. The RTO.Min was set to zero (which with Linux 2.4 timer granularity is 10ms). I would expect 1ms failovers for 1000Hz kernel clocks. For a WAN, the experiment would lead one to believe that failover times of one RTT can be acheived. 10ms should get you across a continent. 100ms should get you around the planet. 1s, part way to the moon. I suppose the point is that, when implemented with performance in mind, SCTP at the transport layer can perform better than many Ethernet bonding solutions at the link layer. --brian > > ~armando > > 0-- --0 > | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | > | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | > 0-- --0 -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097700831-16639-0-- From bidulock@openss7.org Wed Oct 13 17:28:44 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA12980 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:28:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHqqt-0008HE-7A for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:40:08 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Oct 2004 14:37:10 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9DLRlk2011922; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9DLRf7U017166 for sctp-impl-filtered; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410132127.i9DLRf7U017166@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097702861-17164-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Armando L. Caro Jr." From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: Salvatore Loreto , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, alefelici@libero.it, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, pawel.hadam@imag.fr, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:24:14 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: f60d0f7806b0c40781eee6b9cd0b2135 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097702861-17164-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Armando, As I'm sure you know, the OpenSS7 SCTP implementation has been using a weighted version of the algorithms from the second paper since 2001. It also uses a fast restoration technique for restoring suspect destinations since 2001. The implementation also uses a (patentable) FR algorithm that is far simpler than the split-FR presented in the first paper. These allow the implementation to exhibit multiplicative throughput and single RTO fail-over simultaneously. Neither algorithm violates AIMD, FR or max burst rules. They are in fact more conservative. I believe I sent you this weighted algorithm some years ago and said it was worthy of attention. ;) Perhaps more interesting than just the pure multiplicative increase is the way that the implementation smoothly adapts and moves out of the way of a single-interface TCP load resulting in maximization of both throughputs. Unfortunately, those results haven't been presented yet. --brian On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Armando L. Caro Jr. wrote: > Sorry for reviving an old thread, but I'm just getting caught up on this > list. > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > > The interesting thing about the OpenSS7 tests were the multiple > > interface tests on SOCK_STREAM, that showed that max throughput was a > > multiple of the number of available interfaces. Once TCP saturates > > a single interface it has nowhere else to go. SCTP can load multiple > > interfaces to saturation. > > I am curious about SCTP is able to increase throughput as the number of > interfaces increase. Jana has showed that simply using all paths with SCTP > is counter-productive. The transport has to be "smart" about getting > around different issues when doing Concurrent Multipath Transfer (CMT). > Jana has found several issues with "naive" CMT, but has done a nice > job of addressing them one by one. He's still in the process of tackling > more of these issues. > > http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.spects.iyengar.pdf > http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.icon.iyengar.pdf > > ~armando > > 0-- --0 > | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | > | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | > 0-- --0 -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097702861-17164-0-- From PBPYZCMVPYFBAKVSBT@vbnet.net Thu Oct 14 00:49:50 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA17763; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:49:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHxjq-0000UI-JM; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:01:18 -0400 Received: from pool-151-200-120-135.res.east.verizon.net ([151.200.120.135]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CHxYm-0004lV-7u; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:49:52 -0400 Received: from z20.gci.net ([138.204.24.48]) by rl91-ao.151.200.120.135 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(60.497.9418.87945); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:47:15 +0500 Message-ID: <143845$38870PCZK$285@gci.net> Generate-Delivery-Report: No Distribution: florence market Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Adan-Melendez" From: "Adan-Melendez" To: iesg-request@ietf.org Cc: rip-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, bofchairs@ietf.org, ldapext@ietf.org, ietf-action@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, user@ietf.org Subject: Valued Members Only Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 23:42:15 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--1087391422647409" X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a ----1087391422647409 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-3681-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

This is an email to notify you that your application has been processed and
accepted. You now can qualify for a $300,000 loan at 2.6%. That is 30%
less than your current payments.

Fill out these final details to verify your infomation:
http://www.insidefinancial.net/h7/ke.php?v2l=63

Thank You,
LoanStar Inc.
Senior Account Manager



not interested ----1087391422647409-- From bidulock@openss7.org Thu Oct 14 07:38:24 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA04497 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:38:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI479-0007wm-01 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:49:57 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2004 04:44:15 -0700 Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9EBb5k2017324; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9EBaV7U000008 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410141136.i9EBaV7U000008@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097753791-6-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: Randall Stewart From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" Cc: "Armando L. Caro Jr." , Janardhan Iyengar , tsvwg@ietf.org, "Paul D. Amer" , sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net X-Nails-Approved: bidulock@openss7.org Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 05:33:10 -0600 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097753791-6-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Randall, Armando listed two papers: 1st paper: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.spects.iyengar.pdf 2nd paper: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.icon.iyengar.pdf --brian On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Randall Stewart wrote: > Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > Armando, > > > > As I'm sure you know, the OpenSS7 SCTP implementation has been using a > > weighted version of the algorithms from the second paper since 2001. > > Question.... > > What is the "second paper" ... are you refering to some of the > work Armando and Jana have been doing at the U-D or some other > paper? > > R > -- > Randall Stewart -- Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦ bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦ http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦ ¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦ ¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦ ------------=_1097753791-6-0-- From AngelowmnfjGillis@abstainless.com Thu Oct 14 09:38:57 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA16278; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:38:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI5zz-0002J6-Af; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:50:31 -0400 Received: from [211.207.121.167] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CI4zQ-0000j3-KJ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:45:53 -0400 Received: from s98.usit.net ([120.109.64.185]) by g588-l.usit.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(2.191.97772.1975); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:31:15 -0100 Message-ID: <04235.76955.EAxamyp.4854r@usit.net> Generate-Delivery-Report: No Distribution: fringe obsidian Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Carol_Barron" From: "Carol_Barron" To: rafts@ietf.org Cc: haa11894@ietf.org, srg@ietf.org, anet@ietf.org, bmanet@ietf.org, g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org, ep@ietf.org, mipshop-admin@ietf.org, proval@ietf.org Subject: Smile. Today is your lucky day Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:27:15 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--075890193668231" X-Spam-Score: 5.5 (+++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab ----075890193668231 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-5826-5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible for $400,000 with a 2.1% rate.

Please verify your information here:
http://www.wecanhelpnp.biz/green/m79a/

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Carol_Barron, Client Account Manager
Kerry Financial Association
5934 Beach Avenue
Miami, FL 43085 ----075890193668231-- From italychild@mail.com Thu Oct 14 09:42:51 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA17139; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:42:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [211.188.118.140] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI63k-0002Ni-Jp; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:54:26 -0400 Received: from full33.mail.com (full33.mail.com [126.124.169.43]) by 211.188.118.140 Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:41:27 -0500 Message-ID: <200410191474.w6S6ai32743697@mail.com> From: "Felicia Gregg" Reply-To: "Felicia Gregg" To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org, routing-discussion@ietf.org, routing-discussion-request@ietf.org, secdir-web-archive@ietf.org, rsvp-archive@ietf.org, saad@ietf.org, rserpool@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org, rpsec@ietf.org X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 Subject: Prescription Meds At a fraction of the cost 1717 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:41:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="596499990435569" X-Spam-Score: 11.2 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976 --596499990435569 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Girl Extension Buy French Diet Profit Assessment Cameraman Wrap Advantage Produce Advance Windows Lobby Library Inspiration Ambitious Attention Shoes Title Woman --596499990435569 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

Supër Dëâl ön ®x Mëdìcâtìön

NÖ PRÊSCRÌPTÌÖN RÊQUÌRÊD PHÀRMÀCY!
• Ördër âll yöur ®X Mëdìcâtìön dìrëct fröm FDÀ-âpprövëd mânufâcturërs.
Övër 60 pröducts tö chöösë fröm!
Sâvë up tö 70% ön yöur ®X drugs.
• Àvërâgë shìppìng tâkës 2-4 wëëks but öur prìcës ând quâlìty mâkë ìt wörth thë wâìt.
• Àll pâckâgës ârë shìppëd dìscrëëtly by Àìrmâìl WÖRLDWÌDÊ.
Chöösë yöur mëdìcâtìön, pöìnt, clìck, ördër ând yöu'rë dönë! Yöur mëdìcâtìön ìs ön ìt's wây! Nö prëscrìptìön rëquìrëd!
CLÌCK HÊRÊ NÖW!


N-0-M-0re

Girl Curve Market Australia Lecture Memorial Poster Climbing Inn Text Poster Inside Seat Boat Nurse Bike Church Bond Territory Discount Respect Skill Musical Hostess Last Slow Cats Marker Benefit Native Believe Curtain Sleeve Version Symbol Hits Chinese Data Flag Manner Resume Slow Canada Wineglass Kid Dryer Hallo Net Batting Zero Fruit Sheet Brief Explain Wind Timing Draft Truck Technician Century Package Rock Afternoon Jap Native Essayist Handling Paperless Watching Nailist Fiber Paperless First Cleaner Constant Stage Highnecked Touching Drive Shock Excite Follow Demerit Motion White Cover Stylebook Resort End About Today Party Memories Clean Brown Supporter Government Memories Friend Hit Democracy Site Staff Jam Mouse Silver Variation Pay Cross DR Conveyor Plot Director Brief Number Great Address Toilet Sentence Walking Singer Percentage Silencer Kilometer Tourist Owner Observer Sweet Africa Debate Form Brothers Record Street Pole Lecture House Terrorist Days Shut Circle Shape Check Meeting --596499990435569-- From cwinters@atl.lmco.com Thu Oct 14 10:31:40 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA24212 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:31:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI6p0-0003VY-Rz for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:43:15 -0400 Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2004 07:32:00 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9EEUU7o008634; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9EETx7U002663 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410141430.i9EETx7U002663@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097764199-2661-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [sctp performance] english version presentation List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: Chuck Winters Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: cwinters@atl.lmco.com Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:17:34 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 14582b0692e7f70ce7111d04db3781c8 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097764199-2661-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 16:50, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Armando, > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Armando L. Caro Jr. wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > > > > Take a look at > > > > > > http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/RT_2003_Manual/Presentations/5-4_Thaker_etal.pdf > > > > > > which presents failover results nominal 10ms in test situations similar > > > to your full mesh experiment on slide 35 of your presentation and also > > > show much better 1% packet loss latencies. > > > > 10ms failover?! Clearly this is a special case network and not operating > > over a WAN. > Yes it is a special case network. Even though ships are getting bigger, I still don't think you can fit a WAN on one :) > The presentation details the network and test harness. I believe it was ethernet > connected directly through the harness. RTT for the network was substatially below > 10ms. The RTO.Min was set to zero (which with Linux 2.4 timer granularity is 10ms). > I would expect 1ms failovers for 1000Hz kernel clocks. There were 2 tests which I had performed. The both used ethernet with eepro10/100 linux drivers. One was 1% packet loss which was implemented with a kernel module. I think I still have the numbers for the overhead that incurred, although I don't think it is on the webpage(it wasn't much overhead in any event). The other test used the hardware which was setup to oscilate connectivity between the two networks. If this oscillation was happening in the real world, then you would probably be less worried about my max rtt. > > For a WAN, the experiment would lead one to believe that failover times of one RTT > can be acheived. 10ms should get you across a continent. 100ms should get you around > the planet. 1s, part way to the moon. It would be interesting to run the tests on either a real WAN or an emulab WAN. Gautam would know if this could be done. > > I suppose the point is that, when implemented with performance in mind, SCTP at the > transport layer can perform better than many Ethernet bonding solutions at the link > layer. I wanted to run a test with the linux bonding driver, but unfortunately I was pulled onto other projects before I could get this done. Besides, even if the bonding driver was slightly faster, it cannot give you end-to-end failover on anthing larger than the local segment. > > --brian > > > > > > ~armando > > > > 0-- --0 > > | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | > > | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | > > 0-- > --0 Later, Chuck -- Chuck Winters | Email: cwinters@atl.lmco.com Advanced Concepts Laboratory | Phone: 856-792-9749 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs | Fax: 856-792-9925 3 Executive Campus - 6th Floor | Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 | ------------=_1097764199-2661-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBbop+J/kgOOoQ44cRAi/iAJ9McxAU9ONFDFTBs2lP8nnwpjOPDwCfYjBK AxDHPrMJJwBDN+1hX62HNxs= =yUHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------=_1097764199-2661-0-- From cwinters@atl.lmco.com Thu Oct 14 10:50:04 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA26525 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:50:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI76p-0003vs-Dk for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:01:39 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2004 07:58:41 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9EEn9OE004632; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9EEmo7U002938 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410141448.i9EEmo7U002938@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097765330-2936-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [sctp performance] english version presentation List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: Chuck Winters Cc: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com X-Nails-Approved: cwinters@atl.lmco.com Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:37:07 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 3002fc2e661cd7f114cb6bae92fe88f1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097765330-2936-0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary That was odd...Here goes again On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 16:50, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > Armando, > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Armando L. Caro Jr. wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > > > > > Take a look at > > > > > > http://www.omg.org/news/meetings/workshops/RT_2003_Manual/Presentations/5-4_Thaker_etal.pdf > > > > > > which presents failover results nominal 10ms in test situations similar > > > to your full mesh experiment on slide 35 of your presentation and also > > > show much better 1% packet loss latencies. > > > > 10ms failover?! Clearly this is a special case network and not operating > > over a WAN. > Yes it is a special case network. Even though ships are getting bigger, I still don't think you can fit a WAN on one :) > The presentation details the network and test harness. I believe it was ethernet > connected directly through the harness. RTT for the network was substatially below > 10ms. The RTO.Min was set to zero (which with Linux 2.4 timer granularity is 10ms). > I would expect 1ms failovers for 1000Hz kernel clocks. There were 2 tests which I had performed. The both used ethernet with eepro10/100 linux drivers. One was 1% packet loss which was implemented with a kernel module. I think I still have the numbers for the overhead that incurred, although I don't think it is on the webpage(it wasn't much overhead in any event). The other test used the hardware which was setup to oscilate connectivity between the two networks. If this oscillation was happening in the real world, then you would probably be less worried about my max rtt. > > For a WAN, the experiment would lead one to believe that failover times of one RTT > can be acheived. 10ms should get you across a continent. 100ms should get you around > the planet. 1s, part way to the moon. It would be interesting to run the tests on either a real WAN or an emulab WAN. Gautam would know if this could be done. > > I suppose the point is that, when implemented with performance in mind, SCTP at the > transport layer can perform better than many Ethernet bonding solutions at the link > layer. I wanted to run a test with the linux bonding driver, but unfortunately I was pulled onto other projects before I could get this done. Besides, even if the bonding driver was slightly faster, it cannot give you end-to-end failover on anthing larger than the local segment. > > --brian > > > > > > ~armando > > > > 0-- --0 > > | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | > > | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | > > 0-- > --0 Later, Chuck -- Chuck Winters | Email: cwinters@atl.lmco.com Advanced Concepts Laboratory | Phone: 856-792-9749 Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Labs | Fax: 856-792-9925 3 Executive Campus - 6th Floor | Cherry Hill, NJ 08002 | ------------=_1097765330-2936-0-- From wo16288@126.com Thu Oct 14 12:32:34 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA05238 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:32:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410141632.MAA05238@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.60.98] (helo=126.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI8hq-000691-Rc for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:44:11 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 00:32:23 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.1 [cn] X-Spam-Score: 11.9 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ

 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÅ·ÞÈ·á
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714682076»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From puxmfmmqmjfyj@perm.raid.ru Thu Oct 14 12:34:25 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA05409 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:34:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI8jq-0006CC-5V for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:46:03 -0400 Received: from 200.red-80-38-187.pooles.rima-tde.net ([80.38.187.200]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CI7jC-0006iH-IF for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 11:41:20 -0400 X-Message-Info: 7D1Sumj8C8QJ3yJCyjHZ98kpDXD5ChgANTtydADDND Received: from naveAmormonimmediate (69.BF.5EF.F8) by mail0A.puxmfmmqmjfyj@perm.raid.ru (Bluewin AG 6.5.855) id DE26GS7EV66AVEAE for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 15:27:24 -0200 Message-ID: Reply-To: "Taylor Huddleston" From: "Taylor Huddleston" To: "Sctp-impl-archive" Subject: Identify key ingredients of a winning trade Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:27:24 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--A6D8CEDE5A1354F7A" X-Spam-Score: 10.5 (++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86 ----A6D8CEDE5A1354F7A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-9DD9-E" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Wall Street Oil Report
Soaring Oil Issues For Immediate Profits

All-time record highs for oil are padding oil company profits.
Focus your attention on ERHC - Joint Ownership of Offshore Billion
Barrel Oil Blocks with ExxonMobil, Joint Venture Agreements with
Major NYSE Oil Leaders!

Grab this HOT OIL PLAY with guaranteed Billion Barrel Blocks being
= awarded within days.

Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. OTCBB - ERHC

Current Price .40

Target for October 1.25

What is an oil stock worth with guaranteed preferential rights to
billions of barrels of oil in the hottest offshore zone in West
Africa? Oil prices were pushing through $40 just 5 months ago, now
the $50 barrier has been shattered. Read the headlines lately? Oil
prices are expected to continue climbing.

Serious attention has turned to a group of 9 offshore oil blocks in West Africa where Schlumberger SLB-$69, the world leader in reservoir imaging services, has validated recoverable reserves at over 14
Billion Barrels. This is worth Hundreds of Billions no matter what
formula is applied. This would explain why ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil =
paid over 120 Million to win operatorship of Block 1.

ERHC has very strong percentages of 6 of the remaining blocks to be awarded along with ExxonMobil and 2 other NYSE super-majors that have partnered with ERHC. ERHC has signed a partnership agreement with
Pioneer Natural Resources PXD-$35 in Block 2, and Noble Energy NBL-$60 <= br> in Block 4. Estimates amongst the international press covering these events point to ERHC and their respective partners capturing between 50% and 75% of both Blocks 2 and 4. The awards for these blocks are
= expected to be finalized any day. The value of these awards in
conjunction with international press coverage is the sudden impact
needed to set ERHC shares on fire!

Any oil issue with events of this magnitude in today's climate is going=
to fly. Read the press for additional confirmation of what is at stake. =
ERHC's rights have been exercised by the Company and are guaranteed. ERHC's partnership agreements with oil super-majors are iron-clad.
Investors must act quickly to accumulate a substantial position just before earth-shattering news is released that will send shockwaves
through ERHC.

DISCLOSURE: The information and opinions in this featured profile are <= br> based on sources believed to be reliable but no representation is made <= br> to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not an indicator of future results. This report is a paid profile for information purpose= s
only and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. The publisher has been compensated ten thousand dollars for the preparat= ion
of this profile and for continuing coverage of the featured company. The=
publisher is not an investment advisor and this profile is not to be considered investment advice. This information is neither a solicitation=
to buy nor an offer to sell securities. Information herein contains futu= re-
looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainti= es.
There are no shares presently held and no participation will occur in th= e
trading of shares in any profiled company.

----A6D8CEDE5A1354F7A-- From me@armandocaro.net Thu Oct 14 12:49:33 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA06542 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:49:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI8yU-0006VV-Id for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:01:10 -0400 Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2004 10:05:35 +0000 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9EGmhk2028475; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9EGmH7U004813 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410141648.i9EGmH7U004813@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097772497-4810-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: "Armando L. Caro Jr." Cc: lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: me@armandocaro.net Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:36:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081 This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097772497-4810-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote: > As I'm sure you know, the OpenSS7 SCTP implementation has been using a > weighted version of the algorithms from the second paper since 2001. It > also uses a fast restoration technique for restoring suspect > destinations since 2001. The implementation also uses a (patentable) FR > algorithm that is far simpler than the split-FR presented in the first > paper. These allow the implementation to exhibit multiplicative > throughput and single RTO fail-over simultaneously. Neither algorithm > violates AIMD, FR or max burst rules. They are in fact more > conservative. > > I believe I sent you this weighted algorithm some years ago and said it > was worthy of attention. ;) To be honest, I didn't remember you sending me an algorithm. I dug through my old mails and found a private discussion we had in Nov 2001. I found the weighted algorithm that you're talking about, but the algorithm you sent me was for selecting a destination to retransmit to and failover to. Since the email was sent privately, I don't want to post the algorithm in this public forum without your permission. But in any case, the algorithm/selection process looks reasonable, but I don't see how it applies to Concurrent Multipath Transfer (CMT). Maybe I am misunerstanding you, and you are not doing CMT? Are you saying that additional interfaces multiplies the throughput performance because your failover algorithm is so agressive? You are advocating using PMR=0, RTO.Min=0-10ms, etc. I have also done work that comes to the conclusion that PMR=0 provides the best performance (http://www.armandocaro.net/papers/2004.TR2005-04.acaro.pdf), but an RTO.Min=0-10ms would only work on special case networks (eg, SS7) and not the Internet. ~armando 0-- --0 | Armando L. Caro Jr. | Protocol Engineering Lab | | www.armandocaro.net | University of Delaware | 0-- --0 ------------=_1097772497-4810-0-- From iyengar@mail.eecis.udel.edu Thu Oct 14 13:02:30 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA07564 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:02:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CI9B0-0006o8-Cm for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:14:07 -0400 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (171.71.177.238) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2004 10:11:03 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9EG1WOE001199; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9EH1P7U005016 for sctp-impl-filtered; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410141701.i9EH1P7U005016@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097773285-5008-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: Concurrent Multipath Transfer (was Re: [Tsvwg] sctp performance) List-Id: sctp-impl To: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" From: Janardhan Iyengar Cc: "Armando L. Caro Jr." , lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net, tsvwg@ietf.org, sctp-impl@external.cisco.com, "Paul D. Amer" , Janardhan Iyengar X-Nails-Approved: iyengar@mail.eecis.udel.edu Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 12:49:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097773285-5008-0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Hi Brian/all, (I trimmed the Cc list. And I apologize for posting on several lists. But this discussion started on all these lists. Maybe it could move to one/more lists as per interest?) The papers that are referred to in this thread are: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.spects.iyengar.pdf http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2004.icon.iyengar.pdf I add another paper here, which is currently under submission and is a continuation of CMT work: http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar/publications/2005.icdcs.iyengar.pdf > As I'm sure you know, the OpenSS7 SCTP implementation has been using a > weighted version of the algorithms from the second paper since 2001. [...] > The implementation also uses a (patentable) FR algorithm that is far > simpler than the split-FR presented in the first paper. I certainly did not know that you already implemented these algorithms. I don't think any of the co-authors on the papers knew either. Could you post the algos, or send a reference that we could look up? If your FR algo is far simpler, I would certainly like to look at it, because I could not get the SFR-CACC algo to be simpler than it is. Well, it is simpler than it _was_, but I do not know how to make it any simpler. Also, the first paper presents two other algos - the CUC and DAC algos. At least the CUC algorithm is, IMHO, necessary to see expected throughput, at least if the paths in question have different end-to-end delays. Did you implement something like CUC too? You say the algo is "patentable" - I do not understand what that means. Did you mean to say the algo is "patentED"? So, can you post the algo? Note: The ID (draft-iyengar-sctp-cacc-xx.txt) which was first published in Feb 2002 has expired now, but I'm planning to resubmit it in a new form and with significant additions/modifications. I wanted to spend more time looking at changeover/CMT concerns with SCTP before putting something out as an ID. regards, jana --------------------------------------------------------------- Janardhan R. Iyengar http://www.cis.udel.edu/~iyengar Protocol Engineering Lab -- CIS -- University Of Delaware --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------=_1097773285-5008-0-- From wo16281628@163.net Thu Oct 14 16:55:45 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA01515 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:55:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410142055.QAA01515@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.62.225] (helo=163.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CICok-0004N6-OF for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 17:07:24 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:55:44 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.1 [cn] X-Spam-Score: 10.5 (++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ
 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÅ·ÞÈ·á
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714682076»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From xvrfgwuse@fuse.net Fri Oct 15 07:56:41 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA20487; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:56:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [61.106.193.51] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIQsg-0005E8-8Q; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 08:08:27 -0400 X-Message-Info: BSUiwoOZ8ozcRFk/byCJPnwdXiXccyRYAcahuCXfb81JHP Received: from chisholm-dgi983.borrow.ix.netcom.com (216.174.230.3) by d6-on6.ix.netcom.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:44:02 -0300 From: Hotpenny Stocks To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Super-star Stock Report Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:48:02 -0100 EST Message-ID: <81220705711219610.061.5@destruct-j2.ix.netcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--3972013752967746452" X-Spam-Score: 9.1 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 93df555cbdbcdae9621e5b95d44b301e ----3972013752967746452 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Breaking News At The Close Tuesday October 12th, 2004 Perfisans Networks Corporation OTCBB: PFNH Revenues Three Months Ended June 30,2004: 696,504 USD Revenues Six Months Ended June 30,2004: 1,032,322 USD Source: 10-Q August 16, 2004 How will the Stock React Tomorrow to Today's News? A Large PR Campaign Apprising Potential Investors of This Development is Underway Starting Tuesday Evening. This announcement Will Hopefully be Seen By Thousands and Thousands of Potential Investors Tuesday Evening and Into Wednesday. If you think PFNH is a mover and goes higher, you may not want to wait until it's too late as Timing is So Important. Press Release Source: Perfisans Networks Corporation 1,000,000 USD Deal Validates Marketplace Viability of Perfisans' Revolutionary Network Speed-Boosting Chip Technology LOS ANGELES BUSINESS WIRE Oct. 12, 2004. Perfisans Networks Corp., OTCBB:PFNH, a next-generation semiconductor designer focused on the burgeoning Gigabit Ethernet market, has announced the first booking for its proprietary network accelerator chips, marking the patented technology's successful progress from the design-table to the real-world marketplace. Under the agreement, Perfisans will supply its ENA1001 gigabit network acceleration chip to DBL Technology Co. Ltd. The agreement calls for more than 1.1 million in sales over a period of 12 months. DBL is a maker of Voice-Over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) communications equipment, based in Shenzhen, China, and is a significant original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for the enormous Taiwan and China communication markets. DBL will integrate the ENA1001 gigabit network chip into several of its product designs. With Perfisans' TOE technology, solid performance and favorable pricing and technical-support policies, DBL officials believe they can significantly raise their product's price/performance ratio and allow them to outperform their competitors. "Our relationship with DBL is a major milestone in entering the Chinese networking equipment market, and a major endorsement of the technology we developed," said To Hon Lam, President and CEO of Perfisans. "As one of the major suppliers of VoIP equipment, DBL has substantial expertise and business relationships in place with major OEMs and telecommunication operators. By integrating the Perfisans network-acceleration chipsets into their communication network products, DBL can provide a cost-effective yet high-performance solution to their customers." DBL, a provider of VoIP products to system integrators in Taiwan and China, also required the Perfisans products to adhere to the highest levels of standards and protocols, to retain its select approval by the exacting Chinese Ministry of Information Industry. Voice over IP, which enables telephone communication via the Internet, is one of the fastest-growing areas of the telecommunications market, and is expected to eventually replace the traditional telephone system, as major telecommunication companies continue to move to VoIP systems. Perfisans' chips can significantly improve and simplify the design of VOIP products, in addition to its role in boosting the performance of Ethernet data-networks in business and home computer systems. About DBL Technology Co. Ltd. DBL Technology Co. is a major communication equipment company of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) for the worldwide market. DBL designs VoIP Gateways, IP Phone, Gatekeeper, Relay Servers, and high performance AAA Billing servers. The company is based in Shenzen Province, China. About Perfisans Holdings, Inc. Founded in 2001, Perfisans Holdings, Inc. is an emerging ASIC design house focused on developing leading edge, cost-effective, system-on-chip (SOC) integrated circuits (IC) and delivering innovative solutions that address the performance needs of next generation network systems. Rapidly being recognized by industry leaders for its innovative network interface products, the Company's technologies have applications in telecommunication, data communication, storage networks, content delivery networks, broadband networks, and rich streaming media. Perfisans' chip technology is fully standards-compliant, and provides high-efficiency, high-quality network connections for both business and home applications. The Perfisans' ENA1001 can efficiently process protocols such as IP and TCP, and its high-speed protocol-processing capabilities -- 10 times faster than typical 100M-bit networks -- can vastly improve the efficiency of the network. The ENA1001 network interface chip employs Perfisans' proprietary TCP offload engine (TOE), providing highly efficient network throughput, to enable high-performance networks for a wide range of applications. Cautionary Statement This press release contains statements relating to future results of Perfisans, including certain projections and business trends, that are future looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry and the markets addressed by the company's and its customers products; demand for and market acceptance of new and existing products; successful development of new products; the timing of new product introductions; changes in product mix; product obsolescence; the availability of manufacturing capacity; fluctuations in manufacturing yields; pricing pressures and other competitive factors; the ability to develop and implement new technologies and to obtain protection for the related intellectual property; the uncertainties of litigation; our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; as well as other risks and uncertainties, including those detailed from time to time in Perfisans Securities and Exchange Commission filings. These future looking statements are made only as of the date hereof, and the company undertakes no requirement to update or revise the future looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Good Luck and Succesful Trading! Information within this publication contains future looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be future looking statements. Future looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Future looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as projects, foresee, expects, will, anticipates, estimates, believes, understands or that by statements indicating certain actions may, could, or might occur. As with many microcap stocks, todays company has additional risk factors worth noting.The company has a going concern opinion from its auditor, a large accumulated deficit, a negative net worth, a limited operating history, reliance on a loan from a shareholder to pay expenses and some related party transactions. These risks and others are more fully detailed in the Companys SEC filings. We strongly urge you to review them before you invest. The Publisher of this newsletter does not represent that the information contained in this message states all material facts or does not omit a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. Read the compay's SEC filings before you invest. All information provided within this publication pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. The Publisher of this newsletter advises all readers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this publication. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice or solicitation. Many of these companies are on the verge of bankruptcy. You can lose all your money by investing in this stock. The Publisher of this newsletter is not a registered investment expert. Subscribers should not view information herein as legal, tax, accounting or investment advice. Any reference to past performances of companies are specially selected to be referenced based on the favorable performance of these companies. You would need perfect timing to acheive the results in the examples given. There can be no assurance of that happening. Remember, as always, past performance is not indicative of future results and a thorough due diligence effort, including a review of a companys filings, should be completed prior to investing. In compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, Section17b, the Publisher of this newsletter discloses the receipt of twelve thousand dollars from a third party, not an officer, director or affiliate shareholder of the company for the circulation of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such compensation due to the fact that this is a paid publication and is not without bias. All factual information in this report was gathered from public sources, including but not limited to Company Websites, SEC filings and Company Press Releases. The Publisher of this newsletter believes this information to be reliable but can make no assurance as to its accuracy or completeness. Use of the material within this publication constitutes your acceptance of these terms. ----3972013752967746452-- From mrfemiajibade@yahoo.co.uk Sat Oct 16 01:09:00 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA08194 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:09:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cpanel1.fuitadnet.com ([67.15.28.3]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIgzv-0006eB-1a for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:20:55 -0400 Received: from nobody by cpanel1.fuitadnet.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CIe4P-0004sd-5d; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:13:24 -0500 To: mrfemiajibade@yahoo.co.uk Subject: URGENT ATTENTION/ REPLY TODAY From: mrajibade X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: RLSP Mailer Message-Id: Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:13:21 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel1.fuitadnet.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [99 99] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - yahoo.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 13.6 (+++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MR FEMI AJIBADE. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/REMITTANCE DEPT. Stanbic Merchant Bank PLC. Dear Friend, I feel quite safe dealing with you in this business proposition having gone through your remarkable profile on the internet. Though, this medium (Internet) has been greatly abused, I choose to reach you through it because it still remains the fastest, surest and most secured medium of communication. However, this correspondence is purely private, and it should be treated as such. I also guarantee you that this deal is hitch free from all what you may think of. I am MR. Femi Ajibade , the EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR in the Stanbic Merchant Bank PLC. I am contacting you based on Trust and confidentiality that will be attached to this deal. The Management and the Legal department of our BANK (STANBIC MERCHANT BANK PLC.) in a recent meeting, recommended that the account of MR. ROBERT FINKELSTEIN, who was one of my branch depositor, should be declared Dormant and confisticated the depositor's fund to the Bank Treasury according to our country's Banking and Financial law. He is a foreigner based here, unfortunately He is late as he was amongst those that was Killed in the recent WARRI CRISIS as you can confirm through this website http://www.worldpress.org/Africa/1083.cfm He is an account holder in my branch, he owns a dollar account with the sum of US$35M (Thirty Five MillionUnited States Dollars Only) deposited in the account. In fact it happened that since her death, the next of kin of the dollar account holder (the brother) has not show up for the claim. This is where I am interested on and this is where I want you to come in. I want you to come in as the relation of the deceased, I will give you necessary Assistance and perfect the Legal Authentication documents which will officially recognise you as a relation to the deceased. Then, I will give you the contact of the Payment Authority and you will write an application for the claims as the Next of Kin to Late MR. ROBERT FINKELSTEIN. I shall guide you with all diligence and legal processes to ensure the smooth perfect success of this transaction and the Funds (US$35Million) must be transfered into your own bank account in your country as the newly approved beneficiary. Upon my personal finding on this matter, I kept this information secret to myself until now that I am contacting you. In view of the fact that the deceased customer is a foreigner (from a different country), it is Officially important for the involvement of a foreigner who will pose as a next-of-kin. I will use my exalted position in this Bank to present you as his Next of Kin as you can be his relative, friend or Cousin and the Money (US$35Million) will be Safely transfered into your own bank account in your country. Before I made up my mind to contact you, I have concluded every arrangement to ensure that you receive the funds successfully as the next of kin. Please include your telephone/fax number/ Home Address when replying this mail and I will give you more information as soon as you indicate your willingness to assist in this transaction. We will use our positions to get all internal documentations to back up the claims. The whole Procedures will last only 5 working days to get the fund retrieved successfully Without trace even in future. Please I need the following: 1. YOUR FULL NAME 2. PHONE AND FAX NUMBER 3. HOME ADDRESS / COMPANY'S NAME AND ADDRESS. 4. BANK ACCOUNT (WHERE YOU WILL WANT THE MONEY TO BE TRANSFERED INTO) 5. YOUR AGE/OCCUPATION The transaction will be done successfully and smoothly completed via email and phone. You don't need to come to my country. Send your full name, address and telephone number to me via email urgently today so that I will call you for discussions. I PROMISE that you must be happy and shall rejoice greatly soonest for cooperation with me in this transaction. After successful conclussion of this transaction, we shall share the money 50-50 (50% for you and 50% for me). Yours truly, MR. FEMI AJIBADE. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/REMITTANCE DEPT. Stanbic Merchant Bank PLC. ___________________________________________________________________________ Mail sent from WebMail service at PHP-Nuke Powered Site no-retreat.comr - http://no-retreat.com From rrs@cisco.com Sat Oct 16 06:24:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA09115 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 06:24:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIlv4-0003Cm-0g for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 06:36:17 -0400 Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2004 03:24:59 -0700 X-BrightmailFiltered: true Received: from nailgun.cisco.com (nailgun.cisco.com [171.69.11.147]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9GAN39b005089; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nailscatch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nailgun.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i9GAME7U011958 for sctp-impl-filtered; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410161022.i9GAME7U011958@nailgun.cisco.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------=_1097922133-11956-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: NAILS X-Brought-To-You-BY: djohnsen, stharms, Enterprise Messaging, and the letter "E" Subject: patch-24 List-Id: sctp-impl To: sctp-impl@external.cisco.com From: Randall Stewart X-Nails-Approved: rrs@cisco.com Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 06:20:44 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1097922133-11956-0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Greetings: Patch 24 is now available for the KAME-SCTP stack. (http://www.sctp.org) Happy SCTP'ing R -- Randall Stewart ITD 803-345-0369 815-342-5222 ------------=_1097922133-11956-0-- From begin.promethium@socket.net Sat Oct 16 09:59:26 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA21568; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:59:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIpH6-00077A-Aa; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:11:27 -0400 Received: from 41.145-pool-xdsl-mi.sccoast.net ([66.153.145.41]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CIp5T-0001Eo-AV; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:59:13 -0400 X-Message-Info: 545M83WDh3BWR3vlORWEHOlRSA6ogCF5nTHMsD0321 Received: from v-187-1-093-5.LSFSLB10.RND_FROM_DOMAIN ([136.6.26.120]) by oswxa1-py07.tampabay.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPFWSE(6.131816.572110.32774); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 12:52:28 -0200 Message-ID: <074020.91203056.JYDnd.8513tv@tampabay.rr.com> X-Originating-IP: [143.33.18.189] X-Originating-Email: [fayette.65044chinook@tampabay.rr.com] X-Sender: Emerson Adkins X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Disclose-Recipients: No Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Original-Encoded-Information-Types: multipart/alternative X-No-Archive: Yes Reply-To: "Emerson Adkins" From: "Emerson Adkins" To: bmanet@ietf.org Cc: g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org, ep@ietf.org, mipshop-admin@ietf.org, proval@ietf.org, ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org, bipv6@ietf.org, ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org, xmldsig-archive@ietf.org, ma-admin@ietf.org, et@ietf.org, irtf-chair@ietf.org Subject: Responding back to your application Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:55:28 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--68589249450522326306" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab ----68589249450522326306 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-6310-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible to receive $400,000 with a 2.1% rate.

Please verify your information here:
http://lenderto.net/?partid=rm2342

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Emerson Adkins, Client Account Manager
Madison Financial Association
458 East Main Street
Chicago, IL 60679 ----68589249450522326306-- From Robert.AlanjioddxNelson@imagine.com Sun Oct 17 06:30:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA10631; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 06:30:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410171030.GAA10631@ietf.org> Received: from [207.72.130.122] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ8Un-0004wZ-TC; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 06:42:50 -0400 Received: from militant6duffpole (12.41.764.70) by mail1577.palacasino.com (puzzlelaidlaw OW 1.7.388) id 6959E08MSQT937PBV99 for haa11894@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:28:20 +0300 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Disclose-Recipients: No Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed X-No-Archive: Yes Reply-To: "Elmo Walther" From: "Elmo Walther" To: haa11894@ietf.org Cc: srg@ietf.org, anet@ietf.org, bmanet@ietf.org, g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org, ep@ietf.org, mipshop-admin@ietf.org, proval@ietf.org, ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org, bipv6@ietf.org, ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org, xmldsig-archive@ietf.org Subject: The Results of Your Application Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 08:21:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--48043162433971652382" X-Spam-Score: 8.7 (++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab ----48043162433971652382 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-1688-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible to receive $400,000 with a 2.1% rate.

Please verify your information here:
http://www.wecanhelpnp.biz/green/m79a/

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Elmo Walther, Client Account Manager
Perry Financial Association
220 Central Avenue
Columbus, OH 43085 ----48043162433971652382-- From wo16288@126.com Sun Oct 17 16:43:49 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA23433 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:43:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410172043.QAA23433@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.61.237] (helo=126.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJI4J-00075A-1L for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 16:56:04 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:43:52 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.2 [cn] X-Spam-Score: 9.6 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ

 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÕÅ  ·æ
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714661862»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From wo16288@126.com Sun Oct 17 23:45:56 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA21275 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:45:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410180345.XAA21275@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.61.237] (helo=126.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJOf0-0005ze-Aj for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:58:17 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:46:08 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Score: 11.2 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ
 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÅ·ÞÈ·á
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714682076»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From wo16288@126.com Mon Oct 18 05:03:54 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA29431 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:03:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410180903.FAA29431@ietf.org> Received: from [218.17.61.237] (helo=126.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJTca-0003lA-4O for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:16:17 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:03:55 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] X-Spam-Score: 9.6 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ
 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÅ·ÞÈ·á
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714682076»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From awyijdr@bigfoot.com Mon Oct 18 14:09:49 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07950 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:09:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [201.129.147.246] (helo=dsl-201-129-147-246.prod-infinitum.com.mx) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJc8p-00063b-0R for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:22:13 -0400 X-Message-Info: HzgBL4wOLV8OESqvB67DjH71PS613OKV68h8GUC Received: (from g1bile@localhost) by r2-must33.njh18in.blueyonder.co.uk (7.01.71/0.53.12) id p0GIC509k6; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:20:26 +0500 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: br26-four2.amn415fp.blueyonder.co.uk: saw89adrian set sender to awyijdr@bigfoot.com using -g MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:17:26 -0600 From: Bridgett Briggs Subject: Get over night shjpping! This phemeci is new! bedspread To: scoya@ietf.org Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--456443998184466" X-Spam-Score: 26.5 (++++++++++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906 ----456443998184466 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Great phermeci - Come on noow!
This is a very new phermeci!
You can get here lots of mediccatjons, anything you want!
You can same-day shjpping, in a discrete packkage!
No one will know what you've got!



Do not waist your time!

maw binuclear plymouth downtrodden hologram doherty bordeaux. successor zing jeffersonian paso denver emotion. dovekie chromate todd duct plaza abstracter bicarbonate. compressible incurring agouti noisemake engineer anne.
python storehouse healthful colorimeter cam ticklish transposition ted. arboretum virgin wastage mung explosion themselves. creating bursitis dempsey eternity. pirogue cornucopia awhile. bellow bundle dharma hansel handyman. ----456443998184466-- From admin@staffadministrator.com Tue Oct 19 01:47:12 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA05674 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:47:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cookeville-24-159-17-128.midtn.chartertn.net ([24.159.17.128]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJn22-0004FH-RI for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:59:46 -0400 Received: from ysx.5cidr2.net ([73.107.236.16]) by cookeville-24-159-17-128.midtn.chartertn.net with ESMTP id <159609-68592>; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:46:42 -0200 Message-ID: <40q-t$21$k$$0-9ne9-c4-$$e0-5nq@cqx4w3n.3x.7w0> From: "Administrator" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: ADV: Staff Announcement Date: Tue, 19 Oct 04 04:46:42 GMT X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5D53ECE9.B..3C5DF.0CA_" X-Spam-Score: 19.1 (+++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --5D53ECE9.B..3C5DF.0CA_ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Attention All Nonprofit Organizations: Members and Staff You Must Respond By 5 P.M. Wednesday, October 20, 2004. Through a special arrangement, Avtech Direct is offering a limited allotment of BRAND NEW, top of-the-line, name-brand desktop computers at more than 50% off MSRP to all Nonprofit Members and Staff who respond to this message before 5 P.M., Wednesday, October 20, 2004 All desktop computers are brand-new packed in their original boxes, and come with a full manufacturer's warranty plus a 100% satisfaction guarantee. These professional grade Desktops are fully equipped with 2005 next generation technology, making these the best performing computers money can buy. Avtech Direct is offering these feature rich, top performing Desktops with the latest technology at an amazing price to all who call: 1-800-795-8466 by 5 P.M. Wednesday, October 20, 2004 The fast and powerful AT-3200 series Desktop features: * IBM Processor for amazing speed and performance * 128MB DDR RAM, -- Upgradeable to 1024 * 20 GB UDMA Hard Drive, -- Upgradeable to 80 GB * 52X CD-Rom Drive, -- Upgradeable to DVD/CDRW * Next Generation 2005 Technology * Premium video and sound -- For enhanced colors and graphics * Full Connectivity with Fax modem/Lan/IEE 1394/USB 2.0 * Soft Touch Keyboard and scroll mouse * Internet Ready * Network Ready * 1 Year parts and labor warranty * Priority customer service and tech support MSRP $499 ........................................ Your Cost $227 How to qualify: 1. You must be a Member, Staff or Associate of a Nonprofit. 2. All desktop computers will be available on a first come first serve basis. 3. You must call 1-800-795-8466 by 5 P.M. Wednesday, October 20, 2004. and we will hold the desktops you request on will call. 4. You are not obligated in any way. 5. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. 6. Ask for Department C. Call Avtech Direct 1-800-795-8466 before 5 P.M. Wednesday, October 20, 2004 Visit our website at http://www.avtechdirect-nonprofits.com If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please go to http://www.computeradvice.org/unsubscribelink.asp Avtech Direct 22647 Ventura Blvd. Suite 374 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 --5D53ECE9.B..3C5DF.0CA_-- From wo16281628@163.net Tue Oct 19 02:13:13 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA16837 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:13:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJnRL-0004lh-1C for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:25:47 -0400 Received: from [218.17.59.241] (helo=163.net) by mx2.foretec.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CJnF9-0002Ot-Tc for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 02:13:13 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?ye7b2si6waa/xry8?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?s6y1zbzbKr/sy9nXqNK1yc/Dxc6s0N6158TU?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:13:07 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 7.5 (+++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 ÎÞ±êÌâÎĵµ
 
Ç×°®µÄÅóÓÑÃÇ£º
    ÄúÃǺã¡×÷ΪµçÄÔµÄÖ÷ÈË£¬ÄãÃÇÊÇ·ñÔø¾­ÎªÎ¬ÐÞµçÄÔ¶ø¿àÄÕ¹ýÄØ£¿ÏÄÌ죬×ó§ÓÒ±§µÄ´ø×ŵçÄÔÖ±±¼»ªÇ¿¡¢Èü¸ñ£¬ÏȰ´ÏÂһ·ÉÏŪµÃÏ㺹ÁÜÀìºÍÒ»ÉíÆ£±¹ ²»Ëµ£¬²»¹ý¶¬Ì컹¿ÉÒÔ£¬Ö»µÃÒ»ÉíÀÛ°É¡£µ«µ½Á˵çÄÔ¹«Ë¾¼ûµ½Á˹¤³Ìʦ£¬ÊÇ·ñÄÜÂíÉÏ¿ª¹¤°ïæ¸ãµàÄØ£¿Õâ¸ö»¹µÃ¿¿ÔËÆøÄØ£¬´ËÇé´Ë¾°Äã˵ͷ²»Í·ÔΣ¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÉúÒâÈË£¬Ê±¼ä¾ÍÊǽðÇ®£¬ÔÙ¼Ó ÉÏÕâÊǸö¸ßËÙÐÅÏ¢»¯Ê±´ú£¬Ã»ÓÐÁ˵çÄÔ£¬¼òÖ±¾ÍÏñÈȹøÉϵÄÂìÒÏ¡£Ãæ¶Ô´ËÇé´Ë¾°£¬´Ëʱ´Ë¿ÌÎÒÃÇÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ
¼¼Ö»ÏëÓÃÎÒÃǵÄÇà´º»»»ØÄãÃDZ¦¹óµÄʱ¹â£¬ÌØÎªÅóÓÑÃdzÊÉÏÎÒÃǵķþÎñ£¬¿Ò Çë¶à¶àÖ¸½Ì£¬Ð»Ð»¡£
     ³¬µÍ¼Û**ǩԼ°üÔÂ**¿ìËÙרҵÉÏÃÅάÐÞµçÄÔ
           ÉÁµç°²×°ÐÂϵͳ  30·ÖÖÓ¾ÍOK  ÉúÒâÈ˵ÄÊ×Ñ¡

       (1)¸öÈ˵çÄÔ×é×°¼°Ó²¼þÏúÊÛÓëά»¤
       (2)¿ìËÙ°²×°¸÷ÖÖ·±¡¢¼òÌå²Ù×÷ϵͳ(²Ù×÷ϵͳÀïÒѰüº¬Óи÷ÖÖ³£ÓÃÈí¼þ)
       (3)Åųý¸÷ÖÖ³£¼ûµÄ¹ÊÕÏ¡¢Ó²ÅÌÊý¾Ý»Ö¸´
       (4)°²×°¸÷ÖÖ³£Óð칫¡¢¹¤¾ß Èí¼þ(°²×°ÐÂϵ ͳÃâ·Ñ)
       (5)°²×°ÏúÊÛÕý°æÉ±¶¾Èí¼þ¡¢ËÑË÷¡¢Èº·¢EmailÈí¼þ
       (6)¾ÖÓòÍø¡¢¹ã ÓòÍø¹²Ïí
       (7)ÍøÂçϵͳ²¼ÏßÉè¼Æ¼°Ó¦ÓÃ
       (8)¼ÆËã»ú²¡¶¾·ÀÖμ°·À»ðǽÉèÖÃ
       (9)¿ìËÙ½â¾öÌìÍþ¶à»úͬʱÉÏÍø

       ****µçÄÔά»¤¡¢µçÄÔ×é×°¡¢ÍøÂ繤³Ì****

       **רҵ×齨ÓÐÅÌ¡¢ÎÞÅÌÍø°É¹¤³Ì**

       *ÈÈÁÒ»¶Ó­µ¥Î»»ò¸öÈËǩԼ°üÔÂ*

       **ÈȳϵķþÎñ£¬È«ÐÄÈ«ÒâȫΪÁËÄú**

       ÉîÛÚȺÁ¦¿Æ¼¼ÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
       ÁªÏµÈË£ºÕÅ  ·æ
       ÁªÏµµç»°£º13714661862»ò0755-83601633
       QQ£º282079259   2441630
       E-mail:168it@126.com       Íø Ö·:http://www.it678.net



¡¡    ÍøÂçά»¤£ºhttp://www.it678.net ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡               µçÄÔάÐÞ£ºhttp://www.it678.net
From ebthzjrqgnobjy@di.uminho.pt Wed Oct 20 01:40:00 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA01333 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:40:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ns.ackia.com ([62.160.29.130]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CK9Ow-0007qz-Ch for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:52:47 -0400 Received: from mbteD.kais.kyoto-u.ac.jp ([36.245.192.120]) by hAA2-wug.62.160.29.130 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.1E5.5955.90126); Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:37:44 -0100 Message-ID: fsveukugutblrrkjhvu@127.0.0.1 Generate-Delivery-Report: No Distribution: chao buff small grandparent andesite du lobo baton debtor fiske exogamous across digit burdock probate inveterate s's mature chicago inspect christ hillock lawbreaking chanson percival ambulate augite admiration constant orgiastic Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Robyn " From: "Robyn " To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Coi dplom@ w/o setting a foot in sch00lbedridden maladapt codpiece pta broccoli claustrophobia mailbox bogus procure cremate uterine tine burro adhere schultz defrock pertinent whomever bakhtiari car chamois hebrew diphthong vineyard yond cuckoo bun butte agnew counterclockwise infinity cupric mascara asocial pegboard idiosyncrasy hob malformed contemporary Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:30:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--ACE3B40FF2C77CE66C5" X-Spam-Score: 7.9 (+++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2 ----ACE3B40FF2C77CE66C5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-E1A3-F" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable asteroidal armistice sigma acetate automorphic assyriology laughter= celebrity petticoat driven gunfight tong bowel join bum descendent=20</ti= tle> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859= -1"> </head> <body> <p> </p> <p><font face=3D"Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong>You Still = Don't Have A Uni-ver-sit-y Deg-re-e?</strong></font></p> <p><font face=3D"Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Do you want a pros= perous future, increased earning power more money and the respect of all?<= /p> <p>Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) degrees available</p> <a href=3D"http://www.wieg.biz/real.html"><p>--No classes to attend, no te= sts, no interviews, no more wasting time.</p></a> <p> </p> <p> <a href=3D"http://WWW.wieg.biz/from.htm">to access our discard li= st=20</a> </p> <p> </p> </body> </html> ----ACE3B40FF2C77CE66C5-- From MRXNSPERMVD@mpe.mpg.de Wed Oct 20 02:16:50 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17413 for <sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CK9yb-0000Ki-87 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:29:37 -0400 Received: from ns0.ackia.com ([62.160.29.130]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CK9mE-0006Ye-It for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:16:50 -0400 X-Message-Info: wpd52Y2DD4VBGLmcwTmaWFtZE7ccsXCyTX77FFZD5 Received: from mail pickup service by 62.160.29.130 with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:11:38 -0100 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Language: English X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Approved: Yes (amethystine@127.0.0.1) Reply-To: "Branch2" <MRXNSPERMVD@mpe.mpg.de> From: "Branch2" <MRXNSPERMVD@mpe.mpg.de> To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Umg better job chinook predict kidnap implacable denizen halloween rollback away nelsen manley unbidden basidiomycetes versatec yellowknife pretense arson debase tva albanian daytime berkowitz cycle deter timbre centrifugal cognizable rise odious defocus tattoo dendritic actuate azimuthal wi binomial bayed Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:14:38 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--54D9DB7F08797FB7E4B8" Message-Id: <E1CK9mE-0006Ye-It@mx2.foretec.com> X-Spam-Score: 6.1 (++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 ----54D9DB7F08797FB7E4B8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-B643-B" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html> <head> <title>teleost apperception johnny baseband aggregate barry utter arthur l= arceny cerberus littleton teamster timid urge evaluable marion dressy exti= nguish=20

 

Don't spen= d another minute in a classroom - GET YOUR D.IP.LOMA NOW!<= /p>

Do you feel you sho= uld have got a University Degree?

Bachelors, Masters, MBA, and Doctorate (PhD) degrees available

No tests, classes, book or in= terviews...

 

 ramove me from your list

 

----54D9DB7F08797FB7E4B8-- From EFKSASSQDSHH@ginko.de Wed Oct 20 04:32:03 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA10510 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKC5S-0002hm-9F for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:44:53 -0400 Received: from [211.221.30.104] (helo=65.246.255.50) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CKB1j-0002V0-5g for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 03:36:55 -0400 Received: from EFKSASSQDSHH@ginko.de (216.180.229.238) by kfmepivyFE42CD.aj.211.221.30.104 with QMQP; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:30:39 +0500 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed Auto-Forwarded: Yes Xref: giyzqixpizfocktvyxzf Reply-To: "Rudolph " From: "Rudolph " To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: obtain a better j0b Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:33:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--EBC3999AB0040A637A" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 10.7 (++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034 ----EBC3999AB0040A637A Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-4B4D-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dismissal grapheme shingle impish beneficiary bronchus brisbane acq= uit drip deoxyribonucleic equivocal caste scabbard bissau lilly beheld slo= an arrow gage bereft chromosome booth hire electrician shitepoke protactin= ium hazy christoffel iris manhood=20

 

Don't spen= d another minute in a classroom - GET YOUR D.IP.LOMA NOW!<= /p>

Do you feel you should have got a University Degr= ee?

Graduate now with a Masters Degree and more...

..-You don't have to go back to s= chool, there are no mid-terms or finals!

 

 to take off your email=

 

----EBC3999AB0040A637A-- From nobody@cpanel.servdns.net Thu Oct 21 09:02:54 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA23002; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:02:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cpanel.servdns.net ([67.19.54.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKcnM-0001II-1j; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:15:56 -0400 Received: from nobody by cpanel.servdns.net with local (Exim 4.43) id 1CKcJH-0005J6-1C; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:44:51 -0500 Subject: I LOOK FORWARD TO HEAR FROM YOU From: Zhangwenkang X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: RLSP Mailer Message-Id: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 07:44:51 -0500 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel.servdns.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [99 32003] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - cpanel.servdns.net X-Source-Args: /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd X-Source-Dir: fearcraft.com:/public_html X-Spam-Score: 6.9 (++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit FROM THE DESK OF, Mr. Zhang Wenkang 44 Houhaibeiyan, Xicheng Qu, Beijing China. Dear Sir, I am Zhang Wenkang an Executive Director Projects, of the MINISTRY OF HEALTH CHINA. Through my search in the internet ,I got your email address and after due verication with my colleagues,I decided to forward to you this business proposal in anticipation that you may be in position to assist/handle this business with me. We want a reliable person, who could assist us in receiving funds resulted from over invoiced bills from contracts awarded under the budget allocation for MINISTRY OF HEALTH.These bills had been approved for payment by the concernd ministry.The contracts had been executed,commissioned and the contractors had been paid their actual contractual sums.What we are about to receive now is a kick back from the contractors and Under the protocol division as civil servants, we are forbiden to operate or own foreign accounts,this is why am soliciting your assistance in this manner. On our part, all modalities had been worked out in ensuring a smooth transaction .All I want from you is your mailing address and the name that you want the cheques to be issued on. As soon as you indicate your interest, further instructions will be passed on to you on the procedure that we will follow in accomplishing this deal. On accomplishment of this deal you will be entitled to 10% of the total sum.Note,there will be no financial obligation required from you and this transaction is 100% risk free. If this proposal is accepted by you, kindly reach me immediately via e-mail furnishing me with your confidential and telephone numbers. Looking forward to hearing from you. Best regards Mr. Zhang Wenkang N:B PLEASE SEND YOUR REPLY TO THE ADDRESSS BELOW. [mrwenkang@linuxmail.org] ___________________________________________________________________________ - Admin - http://www.fearcraft.com - http://www.thesilentdagger.com From rxtdu@bellatlantic.net Fri Oct 22 01:53:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA16724; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:53:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from midsouth-24-151-215-41.westtn.chartertn.net ([24.151.215.41] helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKsZF-0006cK-Fo; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 02:06:28 -0400 X-Message-Info: 4uhbulpl8783fkD/zdUDjzRZYrErjI0FUe Received: from skindive (24.32.86.62) by xvx60.fiducial.legitimate.pallid.attglobal.net (InterMail vE.2.04.16.02 50-215-953-3190-8-4469870) with ESMTP id <23040712363618.YXT8439.oktr4-mail.debar.attendee.net.cable.rogers.com@ophthalmic> for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:52:44 -0100 Message-ID: <79210u44738upr$42j22$96964db8xq40@scrawny> Reply-To: "Human viruses " From: "Human viruses " To: Subject: SARS viruses? this may help Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:53:44 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--51664458096427378669" X-Spam-Score: 11.1 (+++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30 ----51664458096427378669 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, We have an Alternative to DRUGS & ANTIBIOTICS. A Miracle Protein than can = help people with serious diseases 'THE ANTIDOTE' Kills ALL known deadly Viruses & Bacteria in the body that keep diseases, = namely: Influenza, SARS, Cancer, HIV etc. A disease must be made DORMANT to stop infection. 'The ANTIDOTE' is the answer. www.clenseyourself.info/hp/ WE ARE THE ONLY COMPANY IN THE WORLD WHO HAVE DEVELOPED AND ENHANCED THIS = PRODUCT FOR SALE. Check Here For More Information www.clenseyourself.info/hp/ Regards Chadwick Babcock www.clenseyourself.info/hp/ Not Interested? http://jmabeik.cd-digishop.info/soft/chair.php ----------- proctor lawbreaker dilettante whichever eben huxley bergen dale fantod del= ineate eater cusp chateau keyboard fumigant compactify statuette marcia wi= thdrawal outrageous appearance trident anus allied pantheist timbre guigno= l warfare englishmen jacobean reptilian simmer freer skill yarrow cozy bis= ect pygmy cryptanalytic candlelit grumble clobber fredrickson madsen acadi= a combinator munson irvine pollution burdensome cinerama devolve i'm round= worm steve antisemite mensurable northland orthopedic bought corvallis ber= nadine similar peaky defiant cloven admissible obsequious spartan bidden b= erenices cooky volatile vulgar sushi anteroom backboard bimini later mark = serge appetite petit decorous whine nine meditate breadwinner show it'd ki= lo divisor brine cogitate nick ross chemisorption size commerce depository= larkspur sill billboard blast freight aberrate middlemen crisscross tadpo= le coachmen cuny skin flatiron agribusiness deuteron hereinafter calgary f= inicky platinum samuel irretrievable aspire sink stowage topeka epistemolo= gy solidify sung exclude bobble embargoes coupon equinox maim variety dieh= ard pierce tolerate sporty mann esteem connie augustan estop leadsman dolo= res vile booklet barley conspiracy ultra ascertain embank ncr acrid commut= ate elton topic tea spicebush bylaw confessor bastion dolores ami burp byr= on hydrophobic antagonist congresswomen caution phobic scuffle ecole model= spook delete foxglove gibberish hornet dextrous bethesda cerium consign t= a she'd airdrop frye mana doesn't actuarial chomp deaden soybean conflagra= te len bib clamp trinitarian execrable salary contract southbound abc impe= rishable eulogy coextensive holloway tangerine peppy rico pigeon schaefer = dora inhalation cloth bade dance digest howell kalmia vex thimble un merit= orious buzzard sphalerite lariat tsar changeable valley crowfoot ascribe w= rack azerbaijan beckon teaspoonful cohesive delirium classic burst midmorn= witty circumstantial rim lumpish strawberry discreet move jonathan clothe= sman crystal armada pittsfield football vanilla gradual teheran spume bron= chiolar imbue shut saponify attempt downbeat reddish tame divert apropos d= ewdrop calm whore homeostasis baptismal frizzle gild sophomoric mesoderm s= nowball casual dissension phone gentleman ----51664458096427378669-- From dfdleeyjqvc@osk3.3web.ne.jp Fri Oct 22 04:49:00 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA13153 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 04:49:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKvJL-0001Fv-Lb for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 05:02:14 -0400 Received: from 12-216-163-244.client.mchsi.com ([12.216.163.244]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CKv6U-0007Xo-Fl for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 04:48:55 -0400 X-Message-Info: 6I64COMwukDCMGO5tvNlcwHX8gudX3CyHCeuUMAY1 Received: (from moreland@12.216.163.244) by sovereignty8.193.207.200.136 (7.03.D/2.46.A) id m74FVrU7F4E; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:51:08 -0300 Message-ID: <1BF72C80.4E82A@dfdleeyjqvc@osk3.3web.ne.jp> Reply-To: "Sallie Mccoy" From: "Sallie Mccoy" To: "Sctp-impl-archive" Subject: great company investments before the brokerage firms join in Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 06:48:08 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--35A44ED621EDE553B7B7" X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86 ----35A44ED621EDE553B7B7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-425E-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Wall Street Oil Report
Soaring Oil Issues For Immediate Profits

All-time record highs for oil are padding oil company profits.
Focus your attention on ERHC - Joint Ownership of Offshore Billion
Barrel Oil Blocks with ExxonMobil, Joint Venture Agreements with
Major NYSE Oil Leaders!

Grab this HOT OIL PLAY with guaranteed Billion Barrel Blocks being
= awarded within days.

Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. OTCBB - ERHC

Current Price .40

Target for October 1.25

What is an oil stock worth with guaranteed preferential rights to
billions of barrels of oil in the hottest offshore zone in West
Africa? Oil prices were pushing through $40 just 5 months ago, now
the $50 barrier has been shattered. Read the headlines lately? Oil
prices are expected to continue climbing.

Serious attention has turned to a group of 9 offshore oil blocks in West Africa where Schlumberger SLB-$69, the world leader in reservoir imaging services, has validated recoverable reserves at over 14
Billion Barrels. This is worth Hundreds of Billions no matter what
formula is applied. This would explain why ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil =
paid over 120 Million to win operatorship of Block 1.

ERHC has very strong percentages of 6 of the remaining blocks to be awarded along with ExxonMobil and 2 other NYSE super-majors that have partnered with ERHC. ERHC has signed a partnership agreement with
Pioneer Natural Resources PXD-$35 in Block 2, and Noble Energy NBL-$60 <= br> in Block 4. Estimates amongst the international press covering these events point to ERHC and their respective partners capturing between 50% and 75% of both Blocks 2 and 4. The awards for these blocks are
= expected to be finalized any day. The value of these awards in
conjunction with international press coverage is the sudden impact
needed to set ERHC shares on fire!

Any oil issue with events of this magnitude in today's climate is going=
to fly. Read the press for additional confirmation of what is at stake. =
ERHC's rights have been exercised by the Company and are guaranteed. ERHC's partnership agreements with oil super-majors are iron-clad.
Investors must act quickly to accumulate a substantial position just before earth-shattering news is released that will send shockwaves
through ERHC.

DISCLOSURE: The information and opinions in this featured profile are <= br> based on sources believed to be reliable but no representation is made <= br> to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not an indicator of future results. This report is a paid profile for information purpose= s
only and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. The publisher has been compensated ten thousand dollars for the preparat= ion
of this profile and for continuing coverage of the featured company. The=
publisher is not an investment advisor and this profile is not to be considered investment advice. This information is neither a solicitation=
to buy nor an offer to sell securities. Information herein contains futu= re-
looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainti= es.
There are no shares presently held and no participation will occur in th= e
trading of shares in any profiled company.

----35A44ED621EDE553B7B7-- From ARXKAESAZG@email.si Sat Oct 23 03:59:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA06413 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 03:59:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cpe-24-197-109-027.hol.nc.charter.com ([24.197.109.27]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLH1T-0000Bd-I3 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 04:13:14 -0400 X-Message-Info: 4EN65Mq8MR0CDirqYTXgqxC865yISH88eJtutHDTFMHTF Received: (from auger@24.197.109.27) by lengthy3.52.150.165.250 (4.47.1/2.77.E) id iA2BZUhS1664; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:54:01 +0400 Message-ID: <21BC2EA332.FFFB0@ARXKAESAZG@email.si> Reply-To: "Faye Orozco" From: "Faye Orozco" To: "Sctp-impl-archive" Subject: there's nothing better than a stock going crazy Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:54:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--F65C938BB45EA9FB014" X-Spam-Score: 9.1 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86 ----F65C938BB45EA9FB014 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-4949-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Wall Street Oil Report
Soaring Oil Issues For Immediate Profits

All-time record highs for oil are padding oil company profits.
Focus your attention on ERHC - Joint Ownership of Offshore Billion
Barrel Oil Blocks with ExxonMobil, Joint Venture Agreements with
Major NYSE Oil Leaders!

Grab this HOT OIL PLAY with guaranteed Billion Barrel Blocks being
= awarded within days.

Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. OTCBB - ERHC

Current Price .40

Target for October 1.25

What is an oil stock worth with guaranteed preferential rights to
billions of barrels of oil in the hottest offshore zone in West
Africa? Oil prices were pushing through $40 just 5 months ago, now
the $50 barrier has been shattered. Read the headlines lately? Oil
prices are expected to continue climbing.

Serious attention has turned to a group of 9 offshore oil blocks in West Africa where Schlumberger SLB-$69, the world leader in reservoir imaging services, has validated recoverable reserves at over 14
Billion Barrels. This is worth Hundreds of Billions no matter what
formula is applied. This would explain why ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil =
paid over 120 Million to win operatorship of Block 1.

ERHC has very strong percentages of 6 of the remaining blocks to be awarded along with ExxonMobil and 2 other NYSE super-majors that have partnered with ERHC. ERHC has signed a partnership agreement with
Pioneer Natural Resources PXD-$35 in Block 2, and Noble Energy NBL-$60 <= br> in Block 4. Estimates amongst the international press covering these events point to ERHC and their respective partners capturing between 50% and 75% of both Blocks 2 and 4. The awards for these blocks are
= expected to be finalized any day. The value of these awards in
conjunction with international press coverage is the sudden impact
needed to set ERHC shares on fire!

Any oil issue with events of this magnitude in today's climate is going=
to fly. Read the press for additional confirmation of what is at stake. =
ERHC's rights have been exercised by the Company and are guaranteed. ERHC's partnership agreements with oil super-majors are iron-clad.
Investors must act quickly to accumulate a substantial position just before earth-shattering news is released that will send shockwaves
through ERHC.

DISCLOSURE: The information and opinions in this featured profile are <= br> based on sources believed to be reliable but no representation is made <= br> to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not an indicator of future results. This report is a paid profile for information purpose= s
only and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. The publisher has been compensated ten thousand dollars for the preparat= ion
of this profile and for continuing coverage of the featured company. The=
publisher is not an investment advisor and this profile is not to be considered investment advice. This information is neither a solicitation=
to buy nor an offer to sell securities. Information herein contains futu= re-
looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainti= es.
There are no shares presently held and no participation will occur in th= e
trading of shares in any profiled company.

----F65C938BB45EA9FB014-- From drhbmqf@msn.com Sat Oct 23 12:05:16 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04967; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:05:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410231605.MAA04967@ietf.org> Received: from [200.253.63.243] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLObP-0007mX-Rk; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:18:49 -0400 Received: from 222.92.27.108 by 200.253.63.243; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:54:33 -0700 From: "Brett Manley" Reply-To: "Brett Manley" To: saad-request@ietf.org, scoya@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org, seamoby-admin@ietf.org Subject: Everyone Need This Saad-request Antivirus: No virus found voracious Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:55:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--729268538605010" X-Spam-Score: 6.7 (++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 ----729268538605010 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Buy Med's 0n-line! Up to 8o% off Vi-c0din, Cia|is, V|agra, Xanax, Vioxx, Valium and many more! Fast delivery! with wholesale prices! -No Con^sultation -No Prior Prescription Needed -Hu'ge Savings! See why our customers re-order more than any competitor! http://bestpills.mythingsusa.com/?k=S17h49 This is 1-time mai |ing. No rem0val are re qui-red ldjuYe6NZ7eqOWvvDApBSKHRDaReSGtwPJrc3b0USyk7hbB3tvCe5qTX0Vaj9h8T1dS ----729268538605010-- From DTWLPICEWMLW@webtv.com Sun Oct 24 07:33:36 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA20541 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:33:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-166-240-163.cust.walrus.com ([209.166.240.163]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLgq3-0004DR-Sv for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:47:18 -0400 X-Message-Info: 5hJZKkziMWN29RhLA9Q27LAlKXgeeoMMKwIBta94DPS Received: from milehigh.net (26.212.236.142) by g7-p6.milehigh.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.4.6776.1421); Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:40:42 +0400 Received: from milehigh.net (milehigh.net 168.198.34.80) by milehigh.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id x9BB137 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:43:42 +0300 (EST) (envelope-from DTWLPICEWMLW@webtv.com) Received: from DCW20064 (modemcable6.76146-6.m.milehigh.net 252.158.1.148) (authenticated bits=0) by milehigh.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id qq91HJ671fgj616 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:39:42 +0100 (EST) (envelope-from DTWLPICEWMLW@webtv.com) Message-ID: <4646rbs0ec2$pgl0h855ry035$92o811rae624@EXB0798960> From: "Enid Hancock" To: Subject: Over night shjpping! This is new phemeci! delve Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:40:42 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--1165422218084122261" X-Spam-Score: 9.8 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 ----1165422218084122261 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Great phermeci - Come on noow!
This is a very new phermeci!
You can get here lots of mediccatjons, anything you want!
You can same-day shjpping, in a discrete packkage!
No one will know what you've got!



Do not waist your time!

aesthetic palermo sims evangelic culpa agriculture effectual shrapnel. bashful tum digression doom bakhtiari swish. alphonse opinion canterelle demur squirm. cartography arum stung harm chrysolite monsieur. disperse agglutinate gunshot.
spectrophotometer tub ripen blastula arrack mummy. radiosonde bimini zirconium owing mockingbird. starboard wakeful gimmickry xylem county circumference shoehorn. ----1165422218084122261-- From ENUQPZKH@dywidag.de Mon Oct 25 09:18:46 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24334 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:18:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from c-24-8-90-35.client.comcast.net ([24.8.90.35]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM4xj-0006XV-HC for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:32:42 -0400 X-Message-Info: CE6K43Ww7L11gjfLnIS1E5isJFvQqbfTSJCSNEC Received: from 200.124.242.192 by radioastronomy101-kuAE.yost96.ENUQPZKH@dywidag.de with DAV; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:18:03 -0500 Message-ID: <8080CBBE844.9B329@ENUQPZKH@dywidag.de> X-Originating-IP: [31.168.212.32] X-Originating-Email: [ENUQPZKH@dywidag.de] X-Sender: ENUQPZKH@dywidag.de Reply-To: "Lelia Maher" From: "Lelia Maher" To: "Scoya" Subject: marketing to healthcare, Exclusive Offer. special Pricing. Introductory offer. Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:17:03 -0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--42A656B385F32878318B" X-Spam-Score: 7.0 (+++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86 ----42A656B385F32878318B Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-3ACC-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Limited Time! Exclusive Introdu= ctory Offer!

The New 2005 United States Healthcare Database.

The United States Healthcare Database is a comprehensive NEW product <= br> that is offered exclusively on a limited-time basis. This complete
database includes all hospitals, nursing homes, and physicians in the country.

In a rapidly-changing industry, current healthcare information is an <= br> invaluable resource to businesses and organizations. The United States <= br> Healthcare Database includes comprehensive information on more than
= 7,000 hospitals, 25,000 nursing homes and 400,000 doctors. It is the most extensive and reliable mailing list and database of key decision makers in the health care market.

Imagine the increase in marketing and sales effectiveness made possible =
by targeting the key contacts by name. If reaching the right decision maker is critical to the success of your direct marketing campaigns, then this is the product.

Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone and fa= x.
The database is available in Excel format on CD Rom. It is designed for =
mailing lists and merges. The data can be selected by state or other criteria such as type of practice. It can be used on an unlimited basis.=

This database covers over 250,000 key personnel and facility contacts =
for more than 7,000 hospitals. Information includes senior managers at <= br> each facility (including purchasing, IT, nursing, etc.) along with
mailing address, direct-dial phone numbers and fax numbers. It also
= includes updated information on hospital ownership, beds, employees, admissions, discharges and specialized services.

For the past 14 years, MedCom has maintained the most comprehensive healthcare lists. Our directories are 100% telephone verified and
updated every quarter. MedCom continues to hold the nation's most
extensive and reliable databases of key decision-makers in the health care market.

Available exclusively on CD-Rom (Excel), the data can be used on an
= unlimited basis. It is easily exportable to other programs for mailing <= br> or faxing purposes.

For a limited time, this extensive database is offered at an introduct= ory
price of $195 (reg. $745).

To order, please print this e-mail, complete the information below and =
fax it to 416-765-0029 (tel: 416-765-0028).

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

STATE:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

EMAIL:

----42A656B385F32878318B-- From valine.Wilcox@yahoo.com Tue Oct 26 03:25:01 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA05534 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:25:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMLv6-0004L2-4P for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:39:07 -0400 Received: from c-67-173-41-126.client.comcast.net ([67.173.41.126]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CMLha-0008TE-7J for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:25:06 -0400 Received: from valine.Wilcox@yahoo.com (65.128.121.113) by uvttnpi46484.hj.67.173.41.126 with QMQP; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:22:03 -0100 X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Alternate-Recipient: Allowed Auto-Forwarded: Yes Xref: ezrhpldirrmdqhdujuwo Reply-To: "Alisa Potter" From: "Alisa Potter" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: Stocks with merger appeal Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:18:03 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--137717542954366" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 5.4 (+++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955 ----137717542954366 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-7113-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Wall Street Oil Report Soaring Oil Issues For Immediate Profits All-time record highs for oil are padding oil company profits. Focus your attention on ERHC - Joint Ownership of Offshore Billion Barrel Oil Blocks with ExxonMobil, Joint Venture Agreements with Major NYSE Oil Leaders! Grab this HOT OIL PLAY with guaranteed Billion Barrel Blocks being awarded within days. Environmental Remediation Holding Corp. OTCBB - ERHC Current Price .40 Target for October 1.25 What is an oil stock worth with guaranteed preferential rights to billions of barrels of oil in the hottest offshore zone in West Africa? Oil prices were pushing through $40 just 5 months ago, now the $50 barrier has been shattered. Read the headlines lately? Oil prices are expected to continue climbing. Serious attention has turned to a group of 9 offshore oil blocks in West Africa where Schlumberger SLB-$69, the world leader in reservoir imaging services, has validated recoverable reserves at over 14 Billion Barrels. This is worth Hundreds of Billions no matter what formula is applied. This would explain why ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil paid over 120 Million to win operatorship of Block 1. ERHC has very strong percentages of 6 of the remaining blocks to be awarded along with ExxonMobil and 2 other NYSE super-majors that have partnered with ERHC. ERHC has signed a partnership agreement with Pioneer Natural Resources PXD-$35 in Block 2, and Noble Energy NBL-$60 in Block 4. Estimates amongst the international press covering these events point to ERHC and their respective partners capturing between 50% and 75% of both Blocks 2 and 4. The awards for these blocks are expected to be finalized any day. The value of these awards in conjunction with international press coverage is the sudden impact needed to set ERHC shares on fire! Any oil issue with events of this magnitude in today's climate is going to fly. Read the press for additional confirmation of what is at stake. ERHC's rights have been exercised by the Company and are guaranteed. ERHC's partnership agreements with oil super-majors are iron-clad. Investors must act quickly to accumulate a substantial position just before earth-shattering news is released that will send shockwaves through ERHC. DISCLOSURE: The information and opinions in this featured profile are based on sources believed to be reliable but no representation is made to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not an indicator of future results. This report is a paid profile for information purposes only and should not be used as the basis for any investment decision. The publisher has been compensated ten thousand dollars for the preparation of this profile and for continuing coverage of the featured company. The publisher is not an investment advisor and this profile is not to be considered investment advice. This information is neither a solicitation to buy nor an offer to sell securities. Information herein contains future- looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. There are no shares presently held and no participation will occur in the trading of shares in any profiled company. ----137717542954366-- From ulmsd.nxzb@siwnet.net Tue Oct 26 07:38:32 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA27294; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:38:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMPsT-00015F-Qq; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:52:39 -0400 Received: from usen-221x255x182x143.ap-us01.usen.ad.jp ([221.255.182.143]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CMPep-0007PF-RL; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:38:32 -0400 Received: from vmwassume14 (civil[12.15.128.214]) by 221.255.182.143 (kj75) with SMTP id <9675514126qne84071qp> (Authid: Sidney$95996$Chen); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:42:56 +0600 Approved: Yes (desorption.composition@chartermi.net) Distribution: g's indiscreet Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Victor Zamora" From: "Victor Zamora" To: bmanet@ietf.org Cc: maddogs@ietf.org, sic@ietf.org, mib@ietf.org, ssm@ietf.org, lemonade@ietf.org, ipr-wg-admin@ietf.org, hubmib-admin@ietf.org, olicy@ietf.org, directory-web-archive@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, entmib-request@ietf.org, nemo-admin@ietf.org, enum-archive@ietf.org Subject: Stop searching! I got what your looking for. Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:34:56 -0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--4263453905255490233" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 3.9 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a ----4263453905255490233 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-5398-0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hi,

Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you
that you are approved for a home loan with a 3.25% rate.

Your tracking number is # XN021
You must visit the link below in 24 hrs to confirm your details.

http://www.my-refi.net/j8/e7.php?v2l=63

Best Regards,
Victor Zamora
Manager
AFC Homes



Correspondence Options

----4263453905255490233-- From 163@chaiyou.com Tue Oct 26 12:19:12 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA19565 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:19:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:19:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410261619.MAA19565@ietf.org> Received: from [219.237.3.15] (helo=chaiyou.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMUFl-0006gj-Cy for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:33:24 -0400 From: =?GB2312?B?sbG+qcHsv8bQy7Duv8a8vLei1bnT0M/euavLvg==?= <163@chaiyou.com> Subject: =?GB2312?B?083Lrrmyvtu7t7GjvdrE3Li0us+y8dPNKMjpu6+y8dPNKby8yvUsutqz9LLx?= X-Spam-Score: 4.8 (++++) X-NONENGLISH: Subject contains non-English characters X-Scan-Signature: 0fa76816851382eb71b0a882ccdc29ac =?GB2312?B?082jrM3RyavIpc62?= To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: 123@163.com Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:18:52 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 н¨ÍøÒ³ 1

ÀûÈó¿Õ¼ä´ó      Êг¡ÓÀ¾Ã      Ó¯ÀûÓб£ÕÏ

ÓÍË®¹²¾Û¸´ºÏ»·±£½ÚÄܲñÓÍ

¸Ã¼¼ÊõÀûÓÃÆÕͨ²ñÓÍÓëË®¹²¾ÛºÍ³É,²ÉÓø÷µØ¾ùÓеÄÇ×ÓÍÇ×Ë®»¯¹¤Ô­ÁÏ×÷ΪÖú¼Á,¾­»ìºÏ¼Ó¹¤,1¶Ö²ñÓͼ´³ÉΪ1.4-1.5¶ÖµÍ³É±¾»·±£½ÚÄܲñÓÍ,³É±¾½µµÍ500-800Ôª/¶Ö.ÆäÌØµã»·±£½ÚÄÜ,ÓëÔ­²ñÓÍͬÑÕÉ«(ÇåÁÁ͸Ã÷)ÐÔÄÜÎȶ¨,ͬ¹¦ÄÜ,´¢ÆÚ³¤,¿Éµ¥¶ÀʹÓÃ,Ò²¿ÉÓëÊÐÊÛ²ñÓÍ»ìºÏʹÓÃ.¹ã·ºÓÃÓÚ¶¯Á¦,³µÁ¾¹¤Òµ,ÃñÓÃȼÓÍ,¿Ë·þÁËÔ­(È黯²ñÓÍ)»¥ÈÜÐÔ²î,ËùÓÃÔ­Áϵ¥Ò»,³É±¾¸ßµÈȱµã,Ͷ×ʿɴó¿ÉС,СÐÍͶ×ʼ¸Ç§Ôª¼´¿ÉÉú²ú,ÈÕ²ú10-20¶Ö,ÀûÈó¿É¹Û,¼¼Êõ·þÎñ2.6ÍòÔª.

ºÚ³ôÆûÓÍ,²ñÓÍÍÑɫȥζ¾«ÖƼ¼Êõ

¹ã·ºÓ¦ÓÃÓÚ¸÷ÖÖÔ­ÁÏÁ¶ÖƵĺڳô²ñÓÍ,¼°Òò³¤ÆÚ´æ·Å¶øÑõ»¯±äÖʵÄÓÍÆ·ÍÑɫȥζ¾«ÖÆ.ÌØµã:ÔÚºÚ³ôÓÍÖмÓÈë2%µÄ¼¸ÖÖ»¯Ñ§Ô­ÁϽÁ°è¼¸Ê®·ÖÖÓ±ã¿É³ýÈ¥ÓÍÆ·ÖÐÔÓÖʵÈÓк¦ÎïÖÊ,»ñµÃÇ峺͸Ã÷,ÎÞÒìζ²ñÓÍ.ÿ´¦Àí1¶Ö²ñÓͳɱ¾15-20Ôª(±È´«Í³Ëá,¼î,°×ÍÁÎü¸½·¨Ìá¸ßЧÂÊÊ®¼¸±¶,Çҳɱ¾µÍ)¼¼Êõ·þÎñ·Ñ8400Ôª.

ËữÓÍÎÞËðºÄÍÑÉ«¼¼Êõ

ÔÚºÚËữÓÍÖмÓÈë1-15%»¯¹¤Ô­ÁϾ­½Á°è»ìºÏ,¼´¿ÉÍÑÉ«,ÍÑÉ«ºóµÄËữÓÍ΢ºì»ò΢»ÆÍ¸Ã÷ÁÁÀö,ÇÒ³¤ÆÚ²»±äÉ«,ËùÐè·ÑÓÃΪÁã(Ô­ÁÏÒÑÈÜÓÚËữÓÍ,Çҳɱ¾µÍÓÚËữÓÍ,ËùÒÔ˵Áã·ÑÓÃ)

ºÚÉ«»·ÍéËáÒ»´ÎÍÑÉ«¼¼Êõ

.ÔÚºÚÉ«»·ÍéËáÖмÓÈë1-5%µÄÁ½ÖÖ»¯¹¤Ô­ÁϽÁ°è»ìºÏ,¼´¿ÉÍÑÉ«.ÍÑÉ«ºóµÄ²úÆ·ÎÞɫ͸Ã÷,ÇÒ³¤ÆÚ²»±äÉ«.ËùÐ軯¹¤Ô­ÁÏ·Ñÿ¶Ö10-15Ôª¼´¿É.±¾¼¼Êõ±£Ö¤Ê¹²úÆ·ÔöÖµ,Ìá¸ßʹÓÃЧ¹û.¼¼Êõ·þÎñ·Ñ8400Ôª.

ÒÔÉϼ¼»¶Ó­´øÓÍÑùµ½ÎÒ¹«Ë¾Ãâ·Ñµ±³¡ÊÔÑé±È½Ï,¼¼ÊõÕæÊµ¿É¿¿,ʵÓÃ,ʵЧ, Ê×´´Ð¼¼Êõ й¤ÒÕ,¾ßÓÐÒ»¶¨¶ÀÌØÐÔ,ÌṩԭÁϽø»õÇþµÀ,Éú²ú³§¼Ò³§Ö·,Ìṩȫ·½Î»¼¼Êõ·þÎñ,¿ÉÉÏÃÅ·þÎñ,±¸ÓÐÏêϸ·ÖÎö±¨¸æÃâ·ÑË÷È¡.Áí,¶Ô¾ßÓÐÒÔÉϼ¼Êõµ«²»ÀíÏëÕß,ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÎªÄú½â¾ö¼¼ÊõÄÑÌâ.ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÓжàÏîȼÓͼ¼Êõ¼°Á¶ÓÍй¤ÒÕ»¶Ó­×Éѯ.(¼¼ÊõÐÂÓ±¶ÀÌØ,¹úÄÚÁìÏÈ,ÈôÓе¥Î»»ò¸öÈËÌṩÓг¬Ô½ÎÒ¹«Ë¾´ËÏî¼¼ÊõÕß,¹«Ë¾½±Àø10ÍòÔª,Ϊ±£Ö¤½Ó²úÕßµÄÀûÒæ,Ã¿ÏØÊÐֻתÈÃÒ»¼Ò.)

±± ¾© Áì ¿Æ ÐË °î ¿Æ ¼¼ ·¢ ÓÐ ÏÞ ¹« ˾

µØÖ·:±±¾©Êг¯ÑôÇøÐ¡ÓªÂ·5ºÅÖÐÌì´óÏÃ804                Óʱà:100101

µç»°:010-51313062      010-51313062                    ´«Õæ:010-64947465

ÍøÖ·:www.chaiyou.com                                   ÓÊÏä:zhi@chaiyou.com

QQ£º422150442

(×¢:ÈçÓдòÈÅÇë¶à¶à°üº­,ÈçÓÐÐèÒªÇë±£Áô»òת½éÉܸøËûÈË!)

From JHOJXG@yahoo.com Wed Oct 27 21:02:34 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA04187; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:02:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMyuS-0003v7-Au; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:17:01 -0400 Received: from yahoobb219201072019.bbtec.net ([219.201.72.19]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CMygS-0008Cy-56; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:02:33 -0400 Received: from 209.151.251.14 by 219.201.72.19; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:59:37 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Julie Wise" Reply-To: "Julie Wise" To: saad-request@ietf.org, scoya@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, seamoby@ietf.org, seamoby-admin@ietf.org, seamoby-archive@ietf.org, seamoby-request@ietf.org, seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org Subject: Vi-c0din, Via-gra are Che.ap Here Saad-request Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 19:59:37 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--5144432034971084784" X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d ----5144432034971084784 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit The L0west price of all med's is here. *Vic0din ($45 only) *Via-gra ($57 only) *Va|ium ($49 only) *Hydroc0done ($49 only) *Phen-termine ($88 only) We are the be-st available nowadays. http://bestpills.mythingsusa.com/?k=S17h49 This is 1- time mai-|ing. N0 re m0val are re qu|red Dqx1acBbGXhxJMmCjIxHh0jLMkADEoxL4DKYApahwS4UMNd2klJNjUOgHnhrlno0wl ----5144432034971084784-- From procoffee@comcast.net Thu Oct 28 06:27:37 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA28172; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 06:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pool-68-160-241-199.ny325.east.verizon.net ([68.160.241.199]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CN7jM-0005rp-GS; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 06:42:11 -0400 Received: from businessman14.comcast.net (businessman14.comcast.net [161.168.140.232]) by 68.160.241.199 Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:27:53 -0800 Message-ID: <200410453854.d8V6al22614448@comcast.net> Organization: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 From: "Raul Messer" Reply-To: "Raul Messer" To: secdir-web-archive@ietf.org Subject: Vicodiinn now racetool Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:27:53 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="3353290598914043" X-Spam-Score: 13.7 (+++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36 --3353290598914043 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit usergitradladiesshoes --3353290598914043 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Ðrúg
Ðósage
Amóúnt
Prìce
Shìppìng
 
Vìcódìn
325/30mg 30 Pìlls $119.00
5-10 days
Vìcódìn
325/30mg 60 Pìlls $233.00
5-10 days
Vìcódìn
325/30mg 90 Pìlls $347.00
5-10 days

Vìsìt óúr ónlìne Pharmacy nów! Lóók únder Paìn Relìef ón the left sìde tó púrchase Vìcódìn. Many óther ®x pródúcts alsó avaìlable.

Prescrìptìón Medìcatìón Netwórk

Count Study Planet Access Bright Wrap Tissue Switch Pin Pole Winner Clock Start Rock Violence Image Knockout Traffic Fan Borderline Head Tough Database Pickup Gallery Menu Drink Typing Bar Minor Excellent Entry Case North Technical Songwriter Chip Waitress Coin Trip Staff Romantic Point Planning Punch Sand Silk Highlight Alternative Soup Salary Children Hotel Typewriter Drug Pump Library Demonstration Border Rise Ranking Exercise Fish Frustration Nonfiction Announcer Shining Highways Care Minute Fibre Queen Coach Mental Locker Soft Slim Motion Shower Dilemma Case Connection Speech Physical Timer Anniversary Candle Camera Materials Rainwear National Heaven Shut Kilogram Journalism Engineering Critical Clock Try Angel Illusion Grammar Appointments Ranking Inn Rise Microbus Physical Hint Lifting Steam Tie Pops Friendship Percentage Conveyor --3353290598914043-- From cyanide.4745coriolanus@ostamerica.com Thu Oct 28 11:51:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA03215; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:51:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410281551.LAA03215@ietf.org> Received: from [211.200.72.125] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNCmc-0006xv-K8; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:05:52 -0400 Received: from crdfleet911 (cause[66.108.154.254]) by 211.200.72.125 (qygf1) with SMTP id <0523978gkd25835eoc> (Authid: Kelvin$6573$Morrow); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:44:45 -0200 Approved: Yes (reparation.27738divulge@pyrahosting.net) Distribution: electroencephalogram media Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Nickolas_Freeman" From: "Nickolas_Freeman" To: srg@ietf.org Cc: anet@ietf.org, bmanet@ietf.org, g-admin@ietf.org, sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org, dccp-request@ietf.org, midcom@ietf.org Subject: Did you get our last email? Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:46:45 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--73705281146843427" X-Spam-Score: 9.9 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906 ----73705281146843427 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-2769-3" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Applicant,

Your application was processed and approved. You are eligible for $400,000 with a 2.1% rate.

Please verify your information here:
http://navajowhite.cash-planet.net/s6/index.php?weo=55

We look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Nickolas_Freeman, Client Account Manager
Lowe Direct Association
5843 Madison Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44105
not interested ----73705281146843427-- From bibb.Pena@hotmail.com Thu Oct 28 16:33:02 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05342 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:33:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNHBM-0001hX-Tb for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:47:41 -0400 Received: from host-62-141-250-53.zamosc.mm.pl ([62.141.250.53]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CNGxD-00017e-MY for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:33:05 -0400 Received: from bsashaymillstoneburke00 (klaus[120.193.156.0]) by 62.141.250.53 (hmiuxq53) with SMTP id <92288428016xkm275j> (Authid: Ebony$7$Blake); +0300 Approved: Yes (calcine.wyoming@127.0.0.1) Distribution: whelan saw glutinous en gallus acrobacy yardstick lift collarbone deconvolve fivefold skirmish emeritus woodrow lace Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "May Montoya" From: "May Montoya" To: sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org Subject: NEW Healthcare Database. Exclusive Offer. special Pricing. Introductory offer. Date: -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--5554458926126184" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 9.0 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86 ----5554458926126184 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-6469-3" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Limited Time! Exclusive Introdu= ctory Offer!

The New 2005 United States Healthcare Database.

The United States Healthcare Database is a comprehensive NEW product <= br> that is offered exclusively on a limited-time basis. This complete
database includes all hospitals, nursing homes, and physicians in the country.

In a rapidly-changing industry, current healthcare information is an <= br> invaluable resource to businesses and organizations. The United States <= br> Healthcare Database includes comprehensive information on more than
= 7,000 hospitals, 25,000 nursing homes and 400,000 doctors. It is the most extensive and reliable mailing list and database of key decision makers in the health care market.

Imagine the increase in marketing and sales effectiveness made possible =
by targeting the key contacts by name. If reaching the right decision maker is critical to the success of your direct marketing campaigns, then this is the product.

Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone and fa= x.
The database is available in Excel format on CD Rom. It is designed for =
mailing lists and merges. The data can be selected by state or other criteria such as type of practice. It can be used on an unlimited basis.=

This database covers over 250,000 key personnel and facility contacts =
for more than 7,000 hospitals. Information includes senior managers at <= br> each facility (including purchasing, IT, nursing, etc.) along with
mailing address, direct-dial phone numbers and fax numbers. It also
= includes updated information on hospital ownership, beds, employees, admissions, discharges and specialized services.

For the past 14 years, MedCom has maintained the most comprehensive healthcare lists. Our directories are 100% telephone verified and
updated every quarter. MedCom continues to hold the nation's most
extensive and reliable databases of key decision-makers in the health care market.

Available exclusively on CD-Rom (Excel), the data can be used on an
= unlimited basis. It is easily exportable to other programs for mailing <= br> or faxing purposes.

For a limited time, this extensive database is offered at an introduct= ory
price of $195 (reg. $745).

To order, please print this e-mail, complete the information below and =
fax it to 416-765-0029 (tel: 416-765-0028).

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

STATE:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

EMAIL:

----5554458926126184-- From mariamabacha47@wooow.it Fri Oct 29 23:11:13 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA07762 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:11:12 -0400 (EDT) From: mariamabacha47@wooow.it Received: from mail1.edisontel.com ([62.94.0.30] helo=ims1.edisontel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNjsV-0000YS-IK for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:26:08 -0400 Received: from [212.247.93.250] by ims1.edisontel.com with HTTP; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 05:06:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:06:48 -0700 Message-ID: <4106B220000733FE@ims1.edisontel.com> Subject: CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS PROPOSAL. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Spam-Score: 9.0 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: f60d0f7806b0c40781eee6b9cd0b2135 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dear Beloved, It is with hope that I write to seek your help in the context below. I am Hajia Mariam Abacha, wife of NigeriaÂ?s former head of state; Late General Sani Abacha, whose sudden death occurred on the 8th of June 1998. Since my husband died, I have been thrown into a state of utter confusion, frustration and hopelessness by the present civilian administration. The security agents in the country have subjected me to physical and psychological torture. My son (Mohammed Abacha) is still under detention arraigned before the federal high court of Nigeria for an offence he did not commit. As a widow that is so traumatized, I am hopeless with my present faith. You must have heard over the media reports on the recovery of various sums of money deposited by my late husband with various security firms. Some companies willingly gave up their secret and disclosed our money confidently lodged there, or many, outright blackmail. Infact the total sum discovered by the government so far is in the tune of $700 Million USD and they are not relenting to make me poor for life. I came in contact with your name and address through my personal research and would want to have faith and confidence in you as I view you to be a responsible personality. I have no doubt about your capacity and goodwill to assist me in receiving into your custody( for safety) the sum of $40.3 Million USD willed and deposited safely in my favour by my late husband. This money is currently kept in Safe Deposit Box (SDB) at a security firm within Europe. As it is legally required, the administration of my late husbandÂ?s property is under the authority of the familyÂ?s Lawyer (Attorney)Barrister Abdulrahman Bubatrafa(SAN). The investigative teams set up by my government have submitted their report after freezing almost all our account. Fortunately, our family lawyer had secretly protected the personal will of my husband from the notice of the investigators and have strictly advised that the $40.3m USD be urgently moved to an overseas account of any trust worthy but ANNONYMOUS foreign family friend without delay, for security reasons. All our traveling papers have been seized by the government thereby preventing us from traveling and all the local and international outfit of our business empire seized. This sum of money is our only hope to stay alive. I have therefore agreed to compensate your goodself with 30% of the total deposit when you finally recieve the deposit box from the security firm and its contents safely lodged in your account. They have equally guaranteed 100% risk-free and smooth transfer. If you are interested in assisting me,please reach me immediately or send to me your confidential telephone and fax number(s) so that I can reach you as soon as possible. For obvious security reasons, it is imperative that you keep all our communication very secret. Do not mention my family,s name or disclose the transaction to anybody. If you are not interested in assisting me, still get in touch so that I can make alternative arrangement as time is of the essence.Please do not expose me to my government. contact me back first through this my alternative email address only( mariamabacha47@netscape.net) Regards, Hajia Mariam Abacha From MGHXMRTSPCC@go.com Sat Oct 30 17:13:17 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18716 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:13:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from atlnga1-ar3-4-64-011-139.atlnga1.dsl-verizon.net ([4.64.11.139]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CO0lp-0001lR-93 for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:28:23 -0400 Message-ID: <536520966551643171366252.4851iy2ud@blueyonder.co.uk> Received: from 44.111.44.184 by wleag248-wix34.ifukh6.blueyonder.co.uk with DAV; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:18:18 -0500 Reply-To: "Brendan Doss" From: "Brendan Doss" To: Subject: This phemma is the bast! Cljck here to get cheip prjces! alizarin Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:23:18 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--196313491778693199" X-Spam-Score: 12.6 (++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464 ----196313491778693199 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hi and welcome to our phhaemeci!
Bast Phaarmeci on the web! We appreciate the time you spend while looking for
new and better phhaemeci sites over the net, so we
decided to let you know about our site, our phhaemeci.
Come on now!

As you can see, we got large verjety of products. You are
more then welcomed to enter and view our site.


http://quirt.azlk4xd5x.com/?wid=100183

columbus chiropractor izvestia roadway beth barlow. burdensome conservatism haploidy quasicontinuous ashen eleventh judicatory incommunicable riverine.
tear argive thuggee ail architectonic cryostat bloody attributive alberich condescend. valve rensselaer france pith bern. quarrymen circumcision enigma mecum tarnish cryostat borden burundi cold pfennig improvise corvus.
boswell centrifugal assuage cacophonist flagstone corridor gully. pyrometer promise weekday acclaim cornea button mathews kabuki tranquillity. affectate slum communicable standard townsmen beastie rufus davies definitive heinz. expressible counterpart osmotic bedspring. dicotyledon execution postal dyadic gesticulate scarsdale bogging becalm decimal. ----196313491778693199-- From HRUOC@isw.uni-stuttgart.de Sat Oct 30 18:35:49 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA24410; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:35:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200410302235.SAA24410@ietf.org> Received: from 68-114-153-143.westtn.chartertn.net ([68.114.153.143]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CO23h-0003J1-Vu; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 18:50:56 -0400 X-Message-Info: 65BG8USCuh878T4yuuHXodWPRC62rQWQ909axEYssfUAK362RL3 Received: from mail pickup service by 68.114.153.143 with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:35:31 -0400 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Reply-To: "Reinaldo Hooker" From: "Reinaldo Hooker" To: "Scoya" Subject: marketing to healthcare, Exclusive Offer. special Pricing. Introductory offer. Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:27:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--607FAB6DB67BCADB88" X-Spam-Score: 17.0 (+++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86 ----607FAB6DB67BCADB88 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-B8F1-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Untitled Document Limited Time! Exclusive Introdu= ctory Offer!

The New 2005 United States Healthcare Database.

The United States Healthcare Database is a comprehensive NEW product <= br> that is offered exclusively on a limited-time basis. This complete
database includes all hospitals, nursing homes, and physicians in the country.

In a rapidly-changing industry, current healthcare information is an <= br> invaluable resource to businesses and organizations. The United States <= br> Healthcare Database includes comprehensive information on more than
= 7,000 hospitals, 25,000 nursing homes and 400,000 doctors. It is the most extensive and reliable mailing list and database of key decision makers in the health care market.

Imagine the increase in marketing and sales effectiveness made possible =
by targeting the key contacts by name. If reaching the right decision maker is critical to the success of your direct marketing campaigns, then this is the product.

Each record is indexed by such features as name, address, phone and fa= x.
The database is available in Excel format on CD Rom. It is designed for =
mailing lists and merges. The data can be selected by state or other criteria such as type of practice. It can be used on an unlimited basis.=

This database covers over 250,000 key personnel and facility contacts =
for more than 7,000 hospitals. Information includes senior managers at <= br> each facility (including purchasing, IT, nursing, etc.) along with
mailing address, direct-dial phone numbers and fax numbers. It also
= includes updated information on hospital ownership, beds, employees, admissions, discharges and specialized services.

For the past 14 years, MedCom has maintained the most comprehensive healthcare lists. Our directories are 100% telephone verified and
updated every quarter. MedCom continues to hold the nation's most
extensive and reliable databases of key decision-makers in the health care market.

Available exclusively on CD-Rom (Excel), the data can be used on an
= unlimited basis. It is easily exportable to other programs for mailing <= br> or faxing purposes.

For a limited time, this extensive database is offered at an introduct= ory
price of $195 (reg. $745).

To order, please print this e-mail, complete the information below and =
fax it to 416-765-0029 (tel: 416-765-0028).

NAME:

TITLE:

ORGANIZATION:

ADDRESS:

CITY:

STATE:

POSTAL:

TEL:

FAX:

EMAIL:

----607FAB6DB67BCADB88-- From JYJFYMZSISVFZ@netscape.net Sun Oct 31 10:03:26 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03036 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:03:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from adsl-63-205-66-117.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([63.205.66.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COHTZ-0006Rg-OZ for sctp-impl-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:18:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20299829637290.22y50041290j@charter.net> Received: from 15.235.84.148 by yaip231-wb1.dqggi26.charter.net with DAV; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 07:12:53 -0700 Reply-To: "Sophia Paige" From: "Sophia Paige" To: Subject: This is new phemeci! Get over night shjpping! cummins Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:10:53 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--24603860415008613" X-Spam-Score: 9.6 (+++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 ----24603860415008613 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Great phermeci - Come on noow!
This is a very new phermeci!
You can get here lots of mediccatjons, anything you want!
You can same-day shjpping, in a discrete packkage!
No one will know what you've got!



Do not waist your time!

couldn't gallows washburn capitol nantucket habituate technology. alligator basin chaplin bicarbonate mandarin andrews cowhide.
matrix fluff fantastic imposition blunder wow. apace monetary stealthy cauliflower wino brown. hoi adrenaline real honorarium barcelona flamboyant malaysia. ----24603860415008613-- From admin@staffadministrator.com Sun Oct 31 16:05:20 2004 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA04017; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:05:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from res-24-196-162-044.ash.nc.charter.com ([24.196.162.44]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CON7t-0005Ic-8m; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:20:38 -0500 Received: from ip.zddrc.com [249.28.235.32] by res-24-196-162-044.ash.nc.charter.com with ESMTP id <738880-23460>; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:00:56 +0300 Message-ID: <7$45$0o-$$md9z-$atz4aa@ae317.82zib> From: "Administrator" To: advcomm@ietf.org Subject: ADV: Staff Announcement Date: Mon, 01 Nov 04 00:00:56 GMT X-Priority: 1 X-MSMail-Priority: High X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1B7BE503DE0BCA74" X-Spam-Score: 22.3 (++++++++++++++++++++++) X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Scan-Signature: d8ae4fd88fcaf47c1a71c804d04f413d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --1B7BE503DE0BCA74 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Attention All Nonprofit Organizations: Members and Staff You Must Respond By 5 P.M. Tuesday, November 2, 2004. Through a special arrangement, Avtech Direct is offering a limited allotment of BRAND NEW, top of-the-line, name-brand desktop computers at more than 50% off MSRP to all Nonprofit Members and Staff who respond to this message before 5 P.M., Tuesday, November 2, 2004 All desktop computers are brand-new packed in their original boxes, and come with a full manufacturer's warranty plus a 100% satisfaction guarantee. These professional grade Desktops are fully equipped with 2005 next generation technology, making these the best performing computers money can buy. Avtech Direct is offering these feature rich, top performing Desktops with the latest technology at an amazing price to all who call: 1-800-795-8466 by 5 P.M. Tuesday, November 2, 2004 The fast and powerful AT-3200 series Desktop features: * IBM Processor for amazing speed and performance * 128MB DDR RAM, -- Upgradeable to 1024 * 20 GB UDMA Hard Drive, -- Upgradeable to 80 GB * 52X CD-Rom Drive, -- Upgradeable to DVD/CDRW * Next Generation 2005 Technology * Premium video and sound -- For enhanced colors and graphics * Full Connectivity with Fax modem/Lan/IEE 1394/USB 2.0 * Soft Touch Keyboard and scroll mouse * Internet Ready * Network Ready * 1 Year parts and labor warranty * Priority customer service and tech support MSRP $499 ........................................ Your Cost $227 How to qualify: 1. You must be a Member, Staff or Associate of a Nonprofit. 2. All desktop computers will be available on a first come first serve basis. 3. You must call 1-800-795-8466 by 5 P.M. Tuesday, November 2, 2004. and we will hold the desktops you request on will call. 4. You are not obligated in any way. 5. 100% Satisfaction Guaranteed. 6. Ask for Department C. Call Avtech Direct 1-800-795-8466 before 5 P.M. Tuesday, November 2, 2004 Visit our website at http://www.avtechdirect-nonprofits.com If you wish to unsubscribe from this list, please go to http://www.computeradvice.org/unsubscribelink.asp Avtech Direct 22647 Ventura Blvd. Suite 374 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 --1B7BE503DE0BCA74--