From rddp-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 03 08:41:22 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DSwiI-00042s-TB; Tue, 03 May 2005 08:41:22 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DSiHb-00068s-GR for rddp@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 17:16:51 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA15969 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 17:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200505022116.RAA15969@ietf.org> Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net ([204.127.202.56]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DSiVL-0002bL-BK for rddp@ietf.org; Mon, 02 May 2005 17:31:04 -0400 Received: from i8600 (static-64-222-186-225.man.east.verizon.net[64.222.186.225]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005050221163401200clqjme>; Mon, 2 May 2005 21:16:37 +0000 From: "Barry Reinhold$home$" To: "RDDP" Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 17:16:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcVPXCLpFL9fbS6TQRCkoI34VR7QLg== X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 9a2be21919e71dc6faef12b370c4ecf5 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 03 May 2005 08:41:21 -0400 Subject: [rddp] M bit X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement $rddp$ WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1078814911==" Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1078814911== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0068_01C54F3A.AD8C2EB0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01C54F3A.AD8C2EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Is there any error case in which the returned terminate header MUST have the M bit set? That is, is there any error case in which the DDP segment has to be there? Barry Reinhold (603) 868 8411 bbr@lampreynetworks.com ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01C54F3A.AD8C2EB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is there any error case in which the returned = terminate header MUST have the M bit set? That is, is there any error case in = which the DDP segment has to be there?

Barry Reinhold

(603) 868 8411

bbr@lampreynetworks.com

------=_NextPart_000_0068_01C54F3A.AD8C2EB0-- --===============1078814911== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list rddp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp --===============1078814911==-- From rddp-bounces@ietf.org Tue May 03 12:10:28 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DSzye-0005R2-Ee; Tue, 03 May 2005 12:10:28 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DSzyc-0005Qn-Tk for rddp@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 03 May 2005 12:10:27 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA04881 for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:10:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from io.iol.unh.edu ([132.177.123.82]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DT0CX-0005Ip-N6 for rddp@ietf.org; Tue, 03 May 2005 12:24:50 -0400 Received: from Lola (d124062.iol.unh.edu [132.177.124.62]) by io.iol.unh.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j43GA6On023798 for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 12:10:06 -0400 From: "Bob Noseworthy" To: Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:10:05 -0400 Message-ID: <047d01c54ffa$94cc4340$0700a8c0@Lola> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-UNH-IOL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact systems@iol.unh.edu for more information X-UNH-IOL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UNH-IOL-MailScanner-From: ren@iol.unh.edu X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [rddp] UNH-IOL iWARP Plugfest announcement - call for participation X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Noseworthy , rdr@iol.unh.edu List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement $rddp$ WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Greetings all, I would like to bring to the attention of the RDDP/iWARP community the discussion of the UNH-IOL iWARP Consortium's initial plugfest the week of June 20, 2005. The test plan to be addressed at this plugfest is posted at http://www.iol.unh.edu/consortiums/iwarp/grouptest/index.html and while it will be undergoing further clarification and addition, the spirit of the intended coverage is currently identified in the v0.1 document. This event is pursue/demonstrate conformance to the specification. This testing will yield confidential vendor-specific results intended to improve end user's initial iWARP experiences by correcting any conformance issues earlier in the development cycle. All interested parties, willing and able to participate in the event are strongly encouraged to do so, regardless of membership in the UNH-IOL iWARP Consortium. Interested non-members should contact me for details (mailto:ren@iol.unh.edu). The majority of the conformance test specification and scripts are ready, more information is available at http://www.lampreynetworks.com/Documents/iWARP%20Test%20Spec.pdf The RDDP community is strongly encouraged to review this specification and provide comments. Detailed early testing can generate better interoperable solutions. I would ask for your review and contributions to the proposed test plan, bearing in mind that we wish to take reasonable steps forward to address the needs of the community. Through discussions with Barry Reinhold (Lamprey Networks), Dr Bob Russell (UNH-IOL) and the iWARP Consortium's industry steering committee the proposed conformance and interoperability first steps seem reasonable for an initial plugfest with reasonable participation from the industry. If you are able to participate please contact me directly to discuss. If you currently are not able to participate but are interested in future efforts, please be sure to stay in contact with our efforts here at UNH http://www.iol.unh.edu/consortiums/iwarp/ Please send comments to Dr Bob Russell and myself at mailto:ren@iol.unh.edu;rdr@iol.unh.edu Bob Noseworthy +1-603-862-4342 {Office} | IOL Technical Sherpa (Director) +1-603-862-0205 {10GEC Lab} | iWARP Consortium Manager | 10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Manager UNH InterOperability Laboratory - Research Computing Center PS: Thank you to Mr. David Black for permitting this notification to the RDDP community. _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list rddp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp From rddp-bounces@ietf.org Thu May 05 17:22:36 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DTnno-00029A-SX; Thu, 05 May 2005 17:22:36 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DTnnj-00027v-9G; Thu, 05 May 2005 17:22:31 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA19408; Thu, 5 May 2005 17:22:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [132.151.6.50] (helo=newodin.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DTo26-0001jH-BB; Thu, 05 May 2005 17:37:22 -0400 Received: from apache by newodin.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DTnni-0008MM-GY; Thu, 05 May 2005 17:22:30 -0400 X-test-idtracker: no From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce Message-Id: Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 17:22:30 -0400 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a Cc: rddp mailing list , Internet Architecture Board , rddp chair , RFC Editor Subject: [rddp] Document Action: 'The Architecture of Direct Data Placement (DDP)And Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)On Internet Protocols' to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement $rddp$ WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org The IESG has approved the following document: - 'The Architecture of Direct Data Placement (DDP)And Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)On Internet Protocols ' as an Informational RFC This document is the product of the Remote Direct Data Placement Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Jon Peterson and Allison Mankin. Technical Summary This document is the main architecture document of the RDDP WG. It provides pretty code-intensive description of how the protocol is expected to operate (it uses formal structs to characterize operations). It also contains the fundamental layering model of RDDP. Working Group Summary The RDDP WG supported the advancement of this document. Protocol Quality This document was reviewed for the IESG by Jon Peterson. _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list rddp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp From rddp-bounces@ietf.org Thu May 12 14:15:48 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWIDs-0006Wy-CX; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:15:48 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWIDq-0006WQ-7E; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:15:46 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA17518; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:15:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Black_David@emc.com Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com ([168.159.2.31]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DWITb-00009R-1G; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:32:04 -0400 Received: from MAHO3MSX2.corp.emc.com (maho3msx2.corp.emc.com [128.221.11.32]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id j4CIFenM027992; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by maho3msx2.corp.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 12 May 2005 14:15:40 -0400 Message-ID: To: rddp@ietf.org, ips@ietf.org Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 14:15:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.3.0, Antispam-Data: 2005.5.12.20 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reasons='EMC_BODY_1+ -5, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22 Cc: Subject: [rddp] MPA and iSER: Standards Track X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement $rddp$ WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org I've corresponded with the Transport Area Director for the RDDP WG (Jon Peterson), and the resulting agreement is that the RFC standards track is appropriate for MPA and hence also iSER, so the initial status that will be requested for both will be Proposed Standard RFC. Many thanks for everyone's patience with the necessity of deferring this decision until after MPA's WG Last Call. As for status/schedule of the RDDP drafts - they've all passed WG Last Call, and so authors should be making sure that the latest versions respond to all Last Call comments and satisfy everything in the ID Checklist: http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html Courtesy of my day job's bad habit of interfering with IETF work, I expect to be getting to double-checking this and submitting the RDDP drafts to our AD (Jon) and the IESG towards the end of this month. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list rddp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp From rddp-bounces@ietf.org Fri May 13 02:37:33 2005 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWTnh-0008P6-5X; Fri, 13 May 2005 02:37:33 -0400 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DWTnf-0008Oy-47; Fri, 13 May 2005 02:37:31 -0400 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA13228; Fri, 13 May 2005 02:37:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail1.microsoft.com ([131.107.3.125]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DWU3W-00009t-CM; Fri, 13 May 2005 02:53:55 -0400 Received: from mailout2.microsoft.com ([157.54.1.120]) by mail1.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 May 2005 23:37:19 -0700 Received: from red-hub-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.71]) by mailout2.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 May 2005 23:37:19 -0700 Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.84]) by red-hub-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 May 2005 23:37:18 -0700 Received: from WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.81]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 12 May 2005 23:37:18 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7548.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 23:37:17 -0700 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [Ips] MPA and iSER: Standards Track Thread-Index: AcVXH1WqVPNix9i8TryxNuhf5273xwAZtd/A From: "Jim Pinkerton" To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 May 2005 06:37:18.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[357E21E0:01C55786] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: [rddp] RE: [Ips] MPA and iSER: Standards Track X-BeenThere: rddp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IETF Remote Direct Data Placement $rddp$ WG" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: rddp-bounces@ietf.org Yow!!!! Jim =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: ips-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ips-bounces@ietf.org] On=20 > Behalf Of Black_David@emc.com > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 11:15 AM > To: rddp@ietf.org; ips@ietf.org > Subject: [Ips] MPA and iSER: Standards Track >=20 > I've corresponded with the Transport Area Director for the=20 > RDDP WG (Jon Peterson), and the resulting agreement is that=20 > the RFC standards track is appropriate for MPA and hence also=20 > iSER, so the initial status that will be requested for both=20 > will be Proposed Standard RFC. > Many thanks for everyone's patience with the necessity of=20 > deferring this decision until after MPA's WG Last Call. >=20 > As for status/schedule of the RDDP drafts - they've all=20 > passed WG Last Call, and so authors should be making sure=20 > that the latest versions respond to all Last Call comments=20 > and satisfy everything in the ID Checklist: >=20 > http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html >=20 > Courtesy of my day job's bad habit of interfering with IETF=20 > work, I expect to be getting to double-checking this and=20 > submitting the RDDP drafts to our AD (Jon) and the IESG=20 > towards the end of this month. >=20 > Thanks, > --David > ---------------------------------------------------- > David L. Black, Senior Technologist > EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 > +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 > black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 > ---------------------------------------------------- >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > Ips@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips >=20 _______________________________________________ rddp mailing list rddp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rddp