Question about XML ports registry

From port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Sep 3 14:44:14 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: port-srv-reg-archive@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-port-srv-reg-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AD03A6AD5; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AE73A6AD5 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YtiWx3eW8cub for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5813A68D7 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.233]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:43:44 -0700 From: Michelle Cotton To: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:43:29 -0700 Thread-Topic: Question about XML ports registry Thread-Index: AckJV5dgWWms9IJ3RYCFxxNsyoUeCgAAXrktACBnxrEBDNo63w== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [port-srv-reg] Question about XML ports registry X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1225330400==" Sender: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org --===============1225330400== Content-Language: en Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C4E453111DE20michellecottonicannorg_" --_000_C4E453111DE20michellecottonicannorg_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, I'd like to continue with the work to XML'ize the port numbers registry. The latest draft can be found at the following: See: http://www.viagenie.ca/ianaxml/port-numbers.xhtml At a meeting in Dublin, we talked about removing the zero from the spr-itun= es registration, however that would mean breaking the schema as right now t= he schema says that port number are mandatory. We talked about breaking th= is registration out...and also combining with service names.... What do we need to do at this point? Thanks, Michelle --_000_C4E453111DE20michellecottonicannorg_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Question about XML ports registry All,

I’d like to continue with the work to XML’ize the port numbers = registry.
The latest draft can be found at the following:
See: ht= tp://www.viagenie.ca/ianaxml/port-numbers.xhtml

At a meeting in Dublin, we talked about removing the zero from the spr-itun= es registration, however that would mean breaking the schema as right now t= he schema says that port number are mandatory. We talked about breaki= ng this registration out...and also combining with service names....

What do we need to do at this point?

Thanks,

Michelle --_000_C4E453111DE20michellecottonicannorg_-- --===============1225330400== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Port-srv-reg mailing list Port-srv-reg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg --===============1225330400==-- From port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Wed Sep 24 08:31:21 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: port-srv-reg-archive@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-port-srv-reg-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BEEC3A6A1E; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:31:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177EF3A68F4 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:31:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.187 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id df39npKgqUqM for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19733A63C9 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id E68642006A for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:30:08 +0200 (CEST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-a6680bb000007a96-ce-48da5d009a26 Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.121]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id CE77420013 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.170]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:30:08 +0200 Received: from [147.214.183.33] ([147.214.183.33]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:30:08 +0200 Message-ID: <48DA5D00.9040000@ericsson.com> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:30:08 +0200 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2008 15:30:08.0466 (UTC) FILETIME=[6D321B20:01C91E5A] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: [port-srv-reg] UDP-Lite X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" Sender: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Hi, When reviewing a draft that uses UDP-lite I realized that we aren't = talking about UDP-Lite. The UDP-Lite RFC talks about UDP-Lite having the = same rules and space as UDP. I think we should include a clarification = that this is the case in our draft also and call out that the document = applies also to UDP-Lite. We should also work towards some progress on the update. I understand = Joe owns a token here. Cheers Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287 F=E4r=F6gatan 6 | Fax +46 8 7575550 S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Port-srv-reg mailing list Port-srv-reg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg From port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Fri Sep 26 11:08:22 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: port-srv-reg-archive@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-port-srv-reg-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4341B3A6A8A; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE603A6A8A for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:08:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.583 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.016, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQDLBs+3rezz for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB883A6A7E for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.9.176.50] (c1-vpn11.isi.edu [128.9.176.50]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8QI84hU029050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48DD2503.8040608@isi.edu> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:08:03 -0700 From: Joe Touch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Westerlund References: <48DA5D00.9040000@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <48DA5D00.9040000@ericsson.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] UDP-Lite X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Westerlund wrote: > Hi, > = > When reviewing a draft that uses UDP-lite I realized that we aren't > talking about UDP-Lite. The UDP-Lite RFC talks about UDP-Lite having the > same rules and space as UDP. I think we should include a clarification > that this is the case in our draft also and call out that the document > applies also to UDP-Lite. > = > We should also work towards some progress on the update. I understand > Joe owns a token here. Yup. ;-( Joe > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287 > F=E4r=F6gatan 6 | Fax +46 8 7575550 > S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Port-srv-reg mailing list > Port-srv-reg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjdJQMACgkQE5f5cImnZrs8mgCgkNqQDGL1mP4f6yoOnpM4hAic fLgAoIRLMYC3iPwtH+LJfwOl2bQMCujN =3D43Ch -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Port-srv-reg mailing list Port-srv-reg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg From port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Sat Sep 27 00:08:29 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: port-srv-reg-archive@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-port-srv-reg-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7563C3A68A7; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:08:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09D83A68A7 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:08:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.466 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xL91V2MntpMF for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E87D3A683C for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m8R780E5008851; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:08:36 -0500 Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:08:08 +0300 Received: from [192.168.255.2] ([10.241.184.208]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:08:07 +0300 Message-Id: <5B1DA718-188A-4D95-997E-80A25E32A200@nokia.com> From: Lars Eggert To: ext Joe Touch In-Reply-To: <48DD2503.8040608@isi.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:08:02 +0300 References: <48DA5D00.9040000@ericsson.com> <48DD2503.8040608@isi.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2008 07:08:07.0977 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB397990:01C9206F] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] UDP-Lite X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Sender: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org On 2008-9-26, at 21:08, ext Joe Touch wrote: > Magnus Westerlund wrote: >> We should also work towards some progress on the update. I understand >> Joe owns a token here. > > Yup. ;-( In truth, I'd rather see Joe spend his limited IETF cycles on the TCP- AO stuff right now. I do want to get this pub-requested and off our plate ASAP. If that means no update of the ports draft before MSP, so be it. (The ports draft has other folks that cold do some writing, like, um, the rest of us...) Lars _______________________________________________ Port-srv-reg mailing list Port-srv-reg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg From port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Sat Sep 27 16:54:32 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: port-srv-reg-archive@ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-port-srv-reg-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA7C3A6849; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:54:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: port-srv-reg@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335143A6849 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:54:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m+oigvDYXXSd for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535193A6841 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.45] (pool-71-106-119-240.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.119.240]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8RNrpb9027434 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:53:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48DEC78F.5040906@isi.edu> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:53:51 -0700 From: Joe Touch User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Eggert References: <48DA5D00.9040000@ericsson.com> <48DD2503.8040608@isi.edu> <5B1DA718-188A-4D95-997E-80A25E32A200@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <5B1DA718-188A-4D95-997E-80A25E32A200@nokia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu Cc: "port-srv-reg@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [port-srv-reg] UDP-Lite X-BeenThere: port-srv-reg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of updates to service name and transport protocol port registry List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: port-srv-reg-bounces@ietf.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lars Eggert wrote: > On 2008-9-26, at 21:08, ext Joe Touch wrote: >> Magnus Westerlund wrote: >>> We should also work towards some progress on the update. I understand >>> Joe owns a token here. >> >> Yup. ;-( > > In truth, I'd rather see Joe spend his limited IETF cycles on the TCP-AO > stuff right now. I do want to get this pub-requested and off our plate > ASAP. If that means no update of the ports draft before MSP, so be it. > (The ports draft has other folks that cold do some writing, like, um, > the rest of us...) TCP-AO is on the top of the stack, FWIW. I'm trying to wrap-up the pending edits on that this weekend. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjex48ACgkQE5f5cImnZrvQ1QCgkE4ZCagEcb8YSSggFTXWedbA ZrgAn1pU4xmaFWa67blbMj/0QyuSKF0j =/2ax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Port-srv-reg mailing list Port-srv-reg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/port-srv-reg