From nobody Wed Aug 17 18:45:14 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588A612D831; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:45:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.619 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rGfZAB6Akfqu; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipxcvo.tcif.telstra.com.au (ipxcvo.tcif.telstra.com.au [203.35.135.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8185612D504; Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:45:06 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,536,1464616800"; d="scan'208,217";a="188423905" Received: from unknown (HELO ipcbvi.tcif.telstra.com.au) ([10.97.217.204]) by ipocvi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2016 11:45:01 +1000 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,8260"; a="206519773" Received: from wsmsg3707.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.81]) by ipcbvi.tcif.telstra.com.au with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2016 11:45:01 +1000 Received: from WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com ([172.49.40.159]) by WSMSG3707.srv.dir.telstra.com ([fe80::ccc:aa8f:d2a6:740%28]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:45:01 +1000 From: "Manger, James" To: "oauth-ext-review@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:45:00 +1000 Thread-Topic: Request for error code: all those from OAuth 2.0 core [RFC6749] Thread-Index: AdH48fjP88QF+ZP/Qy6hFHVgjb79UQ== Message-ID: <255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BFED73FC6@WSMSG3153V.srv.dir.telstra.com> Accept-Language: en-US, en-AU Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BFED73FC6WSMSG3153Vsrv_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" Subject: [oauth-ext-review] Request for error code: all those from OAuth 2.0 core [RFC6749] X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:45:09 -0000 --_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BFED73FC6WSMSG3153Vsrv_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The IANA "OAuth Extensions Error Registry" doesn't list most= of the errors defined in the core OAuth 2.0 spec [RFC6749], only those add= ed by other specs. This is just annoying. It would be far more useful for the IANA registry to= be a single source of all OAuth 2.0 error codes. I suggest listing the following to the registry (with RFC6749 as the refere= nce, and perhaps "core" as the "extension"): access_denied invalid_client invalid_grant invalid_scope server_error temporarily_unavailable unauthorized_client unsupported_grant_type unsupported_response_type -- James Manger --_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BFED73FC6WSMSG3153Vsrv_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The IANA= “OAuth Extensions Error Registry”= ; doesn’t list most of the errors defined in the core OAuth 2.0 spec = [RFC6749], only those added by other specs.

 

This is just annoying. It wou= ld be far more useful for the IANA registry to be a single source of all OA= uth 2.0 error codes.

 

I suggest listing the following to the registry (wit= h RFC6749 as the reference, and perhaps “core” as the “ex= tension”):

 

access_denied

invalid= _client

invalid_grant

invalid_scope

server_er= ror

temporarily_unavailable

unauthorized_client

unsupported_grant_type

unsupported_re= sponse_type

 

--

James= Manger

 

= --_000_255B9BB34FB7D647A506DC292726F6E13BFED73FC6WSMSG3153Vsrv_--