From rkoodli@cisco.com Wed Aug 1 09:47:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A00B11E8097 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:47:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YphPDQ55ZWnk for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD5C11E8087 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:47:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rkoodli@cisco.com; l=1352; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1343839646; x=1345049246; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=Oyzyqd8K7iOfQErNF8ZVJuwIe0xzcgjYpfhkeAXktlg=; b=DR4TjN2GQ295rLyhY2qEl8NUq774BJRhT5oT6Y+hnEEvB8p3zyn+6xOE wRx09p4dw0MbgfPPJJt2cwJNVGUsmYCk2Nm6mDBlkjRRZ3SNPCGhKnsrl ZcTL3Jakf5hRwN/AA9Oswr8a5OeCslFTzq9CvMvWfnOsRLXy/oxnWfVjO o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoQHAOpcGVCtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABFgkqCaoFisXqBB4IXEBIBeAELAXQUEwQTIodrC5s6gSigRwSSUgOVR44ngWaCX4FWBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,695,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217";a="107527737" Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2012 16:47:26 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q71GlPDX029143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:47:26 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.9.228]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:47:25 -0500 From: "Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)" To: "netext@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Slides from the presenters Thread-Index: AQHNcAVU8m9hiRSOYUqCoG68tRtVXg== Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:47:25 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.1.120420 x-originating-ip: [10.21.147.122] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19076.004 x-tm-as-result: No--23.899300-8.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CC3EAE356812rkoodliciscocom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [netext] Slides from the presenters X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:47:27 -0000 --_000_CC3EAE356812rkoodliciscocom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks whose names appear in: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/84/agenda/netext/ If you haven't already, please send your presentations netext-chairs@ietf.o= rg by 5pm Wednesday. Thanks. -Chairs --_000_CC3EAE356812rkoodliciscocom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Folks whose names appear in:


If you haven't already, please send your presentations netext-chairs@i= etf.org by 5pm Wednesday.

Thanks.

-Chairs


--_000_CC3EAE356812rkoodliciscocom_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Aug 1 14:38:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D793721F886C; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:38:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.508 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7BzHAAyp+bh; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D8721F8868; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:38:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.33 Message-ID: <20120801213830.19081.96006.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 14:38:30 -0700 Cc: netext@ietf.org Subject: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-rfc5149bis-02.txt X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 21:38:31 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working= Group of the IETF. Title : Service Selection for Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6 Author(s) : Jouni Korhonen Ulf Nilsson Vijay Devarapalli Filename : draft-ietf-netext-rfc5149bis-02.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2012-08-01 Abstract: In some Mobile IPv6 deployments, identifying the mobile node or the mobility service subscriber is not enough to distinguish between multiple services possibly provisioned to the mobile node and its mobility service subscription. A capability to specify different services in addition to the mobile node identity can be leveraged to provide flexibility for mobility service providers on provisioning multiple services to one mobility service subscription. This document describes a Service Selection Mobility Option for both conventional Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6 that is intended to assist home agents and local mobility agents to make a specific service selection for the mobility service subscription during the binding registration procedure. This specification updates RFC5213 and obsoletes RFC5149. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-rfc5149bis There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-rfc5149bis-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-netext-rfc5149bis-02 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Wed Aug 1 16:11:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95EE11E81CC for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:11:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.69 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.69 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.543, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9y0v5QK3mSai for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1214111E826D for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so8557242ggn.31 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:11:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Lcu0IIB30wgEkQ9CF6ky7s95xOF7o+BKbBB9c9xy6g=; b=i3Sewy65FlqXuBUmdpyZ6MXJwzDElcBjdHdHnmlYtGpSm56XI+4yAhH349ApVSnkgm 7qMb4FH6nfzi/O1ixJ5/P4NBMvV0IPlEEqQ2uBuviwVusp0BhmKhG6P7NtEbWlbO8Peb EB4+ir9d7h3y21FWDH2qdzrXa5cPWyYNIrSY3ZoRYUjX9nOqFq0+7pPSY3NvqWuk1Bg5 gPH8dW7ZfWeWyuidOpVoJ6HP6WiQakc24pzzquchOHHcx525jySSYQjvVOasyMH6wsVI YwPsgGBlCnSn2+0ea3kKt5scIkozmF1EYwOJOasuhSnaSUivdZmbBzF6AhDbxLQj//rW Uduw== Received: by 10.60.25.38 with SMTP id z6mr31539748oef.15.1343862697851; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c6sm3732640obd.22.2012.08.01.16.11.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5019B79E.6060100@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:11:26 -0700 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: netext@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [netext] =?utf-8?b?562U5aSNOiBSRSA6IFJlOiAgSS1EIEFjdGlvbjogZHJh?= =?utf-8?q?ft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03=2Etxt?= X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:11:45 -0000 Le 19/07/2012 23:24, zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn a écrit : > > Hello, > > You can double check the draft which says the R flag is set during > the /initial attachment procedure/. I still wonder whether it would not be beneficial to choose another flag, rather than the existing R flag. This R flag has a particular meaning in a particular context. Or maybe, define this new R flag to be in tight relationship with this Type being a PBU. (to avoid confusion of R bit of MIP BU). Alex > > Joy > > > *BOC Michael * > > 2012-07-20 14:17 > > 收件人 "zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn" 抄送 > "netext@ietf.org" , "netext-bounces@ietf.org" > 主题 RE : Re: [netext] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > By the way, if the MAG sends a MNPs option set to 0 in the PBU it is > redundant to set a flag to understand it is for a mobile router. > > > Michael > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *De :* zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn [zhou.xingyue@zte.com.cn]* Date > d'envoi :* vendredi 20 juillet 2012 04:21* À :* BOC Michael* Cc :* > i-d-announce@ietf.org; internet-drafts@ietf.org; netext@ietf.org; > netext-bounces@ietf.org* Objet :* 答复: Re: [netext] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt > > > Hi, > > The purpose of setting R flag is to indicate the network that network > mobility service is allowed to the mobile node as specified in > section 3.2. In this draft, it just focus on the way to assign the > MNP to the MR based on DHCPv6-PD triggering mechanism. > > Regarding the possible hints in IA_PD(s), I dont get your point very > much. Could you explain more? > > Best Regards, Joy > > netext-bounces@ietf.org 写于 2012-07-16 17:12:56: > >> Hello all, >> >> Concerning this draft, I would like to know why you need to set >> the R flag in PBU (because you don't explain it in the draft) and >> if your approach is to not take into account possible hints in >> IA_PD(s). If this is the case, we just have to provide MNP(s) at MR >> attachment with the HNP(s) and we move on another subject. >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Michael >> >> >>> -----Message d'origine----- De : netext-bounces@ietf.org >>> [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de >>> internet-drafts@ietf.org Envoyé : lundi 16 juillet 2012 03:29 À : >>> i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc : netext@ietf.org Objet : [netext] I-D >>> Action: draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt >>> >>> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line >>> Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the >>> Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working Group of the IETF. >>> >>> Title : Prefix Delegation for Proxy Mobile IPv6 >>> Author(s) : Xingyue Zhou Jouni Korhonen Carl Williams Sri >>> Gundavelli Carlos J. Bernardos Filename : >>> draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03.txt Pages : 16 Date >>> : 2012-07-15 >>> >>> Abstract: Proxy Mobile IPv6 enables IP mobility for a host >>> without requiring its participation in any mobility signaling, >>> being the network responsible for managing IP mobility on behalf >>> of the host. However, Proxy Mobile IPv6 does not support >>> assigning a prefix to a router and managing its IP mobility. >>> This document specifies an extension to Proxy Mobile IPv6 >>> protocol for supporting network mobility using DHCPv6-based >>> Prefix Delegation. >>> >>> >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip >>> >>> There's also a htmlized version available at: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03 >>> >>> A diff from previous version is available at: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03 >>> >>> >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ netext mailing >>> list netext@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >> _______________________________________________ netext mailing >> list netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext >> > > > _______________________________________________ netext mailing list > netext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Wed Aug 1 16:16:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A1211E8391 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:16:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.861 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.861 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BmMH6McmaeQH for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFA011E8376 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so14671317obb.31 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:16:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gewQFMt81vp/qxdNpm+z2py8sMcwCBzbZcCQM6E0M5o=; b=szquXVh8KIy9AjGY4VBoihxrzjIltNgpUI9o6PmNvgrh8EQEQm7NOVrdulf/ClBj8A npsDmjqyunrHMvN/cw29gRrAGL61qjbIKLH5WCmkGA2XRyriujCgN2J7q9I5RzzfusVb 7yEQ9ubv94QJ+56YonhoAQGD1UU0zhu2jIbhv8xkiCcl5wy5mVjRetWTzf0XjubEVphx fRn3rHZYZbc0pX8hVR/2FM662psuWXNlr2/YVYKJeDb0EtycMRC2Vo9lm3O2MQ6h7vFz 2GXRgG4YQ+dtrCEO8DvFv3J0BfEAkJ296EpFTqE/3ql+S1SnyFFSPDZCUWtWdscjMTf5 3QDg== Received: by 10.60.18.168 with SMTP id x8mr31380758oed.18.1343862979894; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5sm3755568obk.2.2012.08.01.16.16.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5019B8B9.4000608@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:16:09 -0700 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "netext@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [netext] multipe MNPs assigned by LMA? draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-02 X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:16:21 -0000 I wonder whether draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-02 allows for allocation of multiple MNPs to the MR, by the LMA. Alex From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Wed Aug 1 16:20:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AAD11E8391 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:20:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.838 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkUp9CURAyVE for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1B211E8352 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so8574337yen.31 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BsDCXwAigCvMm/fSzcX3mKw2HrRGVPbbfdQQUkx2R58=; b=JMMnC7zjYeLmXg8CqrwH8DXV+4/3lhi3b/qPAqDKiM52UA6GsNM7TnR5Djquq42xSX aA9NJRq208NCncg1v0y4YI/4ncB8MXxgRAet5AD50Ch6YUNXox49WP5QlfAwLye49WFD qqb5BW3xpP04hLb7T4CiGmFSo/gvOWac1sDEhveKPjqPeFbwK8RusSXltmbCXaeP+rOW HTAzmm1V+H9qu3njaWuSEz7vwxmtN5SUg6vO7U0TA5PmklROemJtwAIEhu1BhgQV+gKi LC2ba9sQ1zNknL3n/mKti4EC0vPwkCXXcHudEglZI3Eyk739ScaxzlJvW7FSFQ79HbPF 391A== Received: by 10.60.2.42 with SMTP id 10mr32432426oer.9.1343863211184; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm2783945oeb.13.2012.08.01.16.20.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5019B9A0.8060909@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:20:00 -0700 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "netext@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [netext] Use of Mobile Network Prefix option, and multiplicity, draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03 X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:20:18 -0000 About this text in draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03: > 3. Upon receiving the DHCPv6 SOLICIT message, the mobile access > gateway sends a proxy binding update (PBU) message to the local > mobility anchor, including a Mobile Network Prefix (MNP) mobility > option as defined in Section 4.3 of [RFC3963]. All the > considerations from Section 5.3.1 of [RFC5213] MUST be applied on > the encapsulated Proxy Binding Update message. Maybe the PBU is not encapsulated, right? > If the mobile access gateway does not know the delegated prefix, > then the mobile network prefix in the MNP option MUST be set to the > unspecified address "::" and the prefix length to 0. The local > mobility anchor either assigns the MR a new delegated prefix or > returns an existing one. Would it be possible to include several Mobile Network Prefix mobility options, each set to 0, such that to obtain allocaiton of several prefixes? Alex From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Wed Aug 1 16:24:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431F311E83CB for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:24:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.818 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.219, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTfA-Es0dpMU for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E06E11E83C8 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so14680371obb.31 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:24:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=llAYIYgQ1ld5R23qlT3JajKvZup3CJpof4uZWJEDmD0=; b=JZFUZw0nFz8U1HxJkq/sem2YETxbQuH1bmwzppOttV7WStt570E5dCbxgLLdkQiTV7 5HUh1kOv9KuR+Jtzf7pz/YjY9BXof8tWQ4TZm2roAcVsk0UaZ6rAnOgdidwNNgtlwsfS /dHdk13Uyi3aw3Il3BBCD0+BTslIX/7eqMI5iwFNQU8NVJry/+V0qPrII+A856/uV9NE y+0IOv80ZGR42817xi3eQKOOIQaVpKWIf2wbxOTw9DHXB8NTxG5XIEX66kXLdelJr9pz jUtg8lAF7bDJKu9cmyhZoH8pOZ5BrWuA7kFGkjEAmd+UHqQm80XOlSNGZ2r3DC2q4c/X 7HWA== Received: by 10.182.110.37 with SMTP id hx5mr31553922obb.48.1343863441232; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:24:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a9sm3773125obp.14.2012.08.01.16.24.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5019BA86.8080103@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:23:50 -0700 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "netext@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [netext] suggested HNP Division operation X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:24:02 -0000 The "HNP Division" operation would work like this: take a /64 HNP and obtain a /128 address (the HoA) and two MNP prefixes - a /66 and a /65. If MAG has a ptp link towards MR, then all HNP packets will arrive at MR and further distributed to LFNs. Described in further detail in draft-petrescu-netext-pmip-nemo-01 Alex From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Wed Aug 1 16:26:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0024511E8225 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.801 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.202, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRT9fCvgFzpe for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061CF11E8334 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so8571226ggn.31 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9CCOeVpnX893dlgFX5pqOcb2RltuCfbe4pBl+vw5U9c=; b=TTjIXRdm2303egRWWo7Yvk29UT8KkkHoXCFaw/UM0yNec7pDilawy/dXmndboEir4Y 63cYJvW7aeIn1IJ32g3wOyUgYrPsAM/sKYuMWHoKfToVXXTQN3RRCHphuuzGfTtNIVu6 knOE1QyOwqjlzJtl7mMHQd4wr11XMZtl8YKeZ2yohHybIVCs26CNWxAT4SG/5myGreLf 4GsOej79YhO0yTUeErgw5/SLH01H4LEpHlurgWe+1nn8SkzEk7vqLG4M7MMOoKF/3+db YMDCbhMmyCaPdCHhKl4nFSTVOjaQ6oAA+E8P3wnip/RgmYuZi7zmYLnH+DG29JwQQ8ei FtFQ== Received: by 10.60.2.105 with SMTP id 9mr31504096oet.65.1343863591446; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm2805012oef.6.2012.08.01.16.26.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5019BB1C.9070003@free.fr> Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:26:20 -0700 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "netext@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [netext] PMIP-PD: usefulness of separation DHCP Server from LMA X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:26:33 -0000 Do you think it would be advantageous to have the ability to separate the DHCP Server from the LMA? I think yes, because it would give more options to deployments. This is in relationship with draft-ietf-netext-pd-pmip-03 Alex From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Aug 8 12:33:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B7611E810B; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:33:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.566 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H5H+mu6AWQZY; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D703711E80AD; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 12:33:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.33 Message-ID: <20120808193302.14451.37943.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:33:02 -0700 Cc: netext@ietf.org Subject: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-13.txt X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 19:33:04 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working= Group of the IETF. Title : Access Network Identifier (ANI) Option for Proxy Mobile = IPv6 Author(s) : Sri Gundavelli Jouni Korhonen Mark Grayson Kent Leung Rajesh Pazhyannur Filename : draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-13.txt Pages : 19 Date : 2012-08-08 Abstract: The local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain is able to provide access network and access operator specific handling or policing of the mobile node traffic using information about the access network to which the mobile node is attached. This specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option for carrying the access network identifier and the access operator identification information from the mobile access gateway to the local mobility anchor over Proxy Mobile IPv6. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-13 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-= 13 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Sat Aug 11 22:52:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC02421F84F1; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:52:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.251 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.348, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KxQ+GXo814gI; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF2621F84DD; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:52:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.33 Message-ID: <20120812055221.29994.78004.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:52:21 -0700 Cc: netext@ietf.org Subject: [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-05.txt X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 05:52:22 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working= Group of the IETF. Title : IPv4 Traffic Offload Selector Option for Proxy Mobile IP= v6 Author(s) : Sri Gundavelli Xingyue Zhou Jouni Korhonen Rajeev Koodli Filename : draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-05.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2012-08-11 Abstract: This specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option for carrying IPv4 Offload traffic selectors between a mobile access gateway and a local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain. Based on the received offload flow selectors from the local mobility anchor, a mobile access gateway can enable offload traffic rule on the selected IPv4 flows. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-05 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Mon Aug 13 09:55:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE24A21F857E; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:55:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VcqRSdYsF8QY; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB9B21F86B4; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.33 Message-ID: <20120813165535.17025.6608.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 09:55:35 -0700 Cc: netext mailing list , netext chair , RFC Editor Subject: [netext] Protocol Action: 'Access Network Identifier (ANI) Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-13.txt) X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:55:37 -0000 The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Access Network Identifier (ANI) Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6' (draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option-13.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Network-Based Mobility Extensions Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Brian Haberman and Ralph Droms. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netext-access-network-option/ Technical Summary The local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain is able to provide access network and access operator specific handling or policing of the mobile node traffic using information about the access network to which the mobile node is attached. This specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option for carrying the access network identifier and the access operator identification information from the mobile access gateway to the local mobility anchor using proxy mobile IPv6 signaling messages. Working Group Summary The I-D has followed normal IETF WG process and has consensus regarding the proposed extension to Proxy Mobile IPv6. There have been no controversies or opposition to this proposal. Document Quality No known or announced implementations of the protocol exist. However there may be unannounced implementations in progress. Multiple vendors have indicated interest in implementing these extensions in their products. The I-D has undergone multiple reviews and they have been acknowledged in the document itself. Personnel Document shepherd: Basavaraj Patil Responsible AD: Brian Haberman RFC Editor Note OLD: However, the location and access information MAY be exposed to specific parties outside the PMIPv6 Domain based on an agreement approved by the subscriber, otherwise, this information MUST NOT be exposed in the absence of such agreements. NEW However, the location and access information MAY be exposed to specific parties outside the PMIPv6 Domain based on an agreement approved by the subscriber, otherwise, this information MUST NOT be exposed in the absence of such agreements. If the location information is to be exposed outside the PMIPv6 Domain then that MUST be done using a PIDF-LO [RFC5139] carrying the usage rules to which the subscriber has agreed. In section 9.1, add: [RFC5139] Thomson, M. and J. Winterbottom, "Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)", RFC 5139, February 2008. From sarikaya2012@gmail.com Fri Aug 24 14:13:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B2821F8540 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.605 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQU17m6NkoV6 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34D921F8533 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so4641406iab.31 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=HTrXP4dYoDq/FQtsREeY4R2goWzpK3Fy35h2n1y8g7Y=; b=ZijCkBdTVW6PFbo40m6sIMlt2wm9e6OX9ZdGeQizRQl2GkVcw8cudQNg0wBYBv399O +q5k4rvpzGgDyulZcXbz4KWrGGzAc/veehYv8gKoEnZRtHAMe17zev0wRS/YM0qkzHjF DDqEJ2j2ik6n/ys95RbMlOMQXirZHNrzsJKCmV6z49XdlU6oFQQRzkR/+DOnxTDHfFXQ UsuKsDmi1CV0t+d5iS3u3uT9F8+jUW8fivRmji6Be9GX/7EH6EkWL2hjS+iuErZVNO6J nF2EI3K4BeRGkuIHu4M91O5Q0WH0eIRJNqnckaXWxkska8MKFswYnLK7eTD9Fj/Eh8sX DLrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.17.133 with SMTP id o5mr3613542igd.41.1345842783453; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.55.70 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:13:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Behcet Sarikaya To: netext@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [netext] draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-04 X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:13:04 -0000 Hi Carlos, I have questions on Section 3.2.1. on MN sharing a common set of prefixes on all MAGs. I don't understand why this is related to flow mobility but not prefix allocation policy. In Fig. 2, you consider flow Y to pref1::mn1 on if2 and then you move flow Y to if1. I am confused about the figure. How come pref1::mn1 and pref1::mn1 stays the same? What is mn1? Is it the iid? Do you assume that both if1 and if2 have the same iid? How could this be possible? Secondly you did not mention this assumption. I think that if2 should be referred to as mn2 then the situation will be clear, i.e. moving flows between two different interfaces with different addresses, so this case is not any different than the cases you have in Sections 3.2.2 and 3.2.3. You explain in this section that some flow mobility update action (?) happens in both LMA and MN and the flow is magically moved. Even if we assume what you have is correct this case does not deserve any mention in the draft, i.e. there is no observable action to specify. I have more coming up later. Regards, Behcet