From alam_fresher@yahoo.co.in Sun Jul 5 21:38:05 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8132428C195 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:38:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.81 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.81 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.925, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gtxxGmSolf+f for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web94305.mail.in2.yahoo.com (web94305.mail.in2.yahoo.com [203.104.16.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C809A28C18C for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27305 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jul 2009 04:38:14 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1246855094; bh=a6cY7EhfUrghIgtKXmqHEY+tyItqpB7qiiPh3bMegGw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WqdVnlwD8Qqzlt8cJjvu9QpkYmi/E6xZ2ZmSkYlWV/kBwUFimVGWhWS2AiPMGVEcfGQnLFm+/rZFpwgOkKVy2abJDgVJduAIUDtoaeyJm6VN7qTnseEdGVw2EVFsVt2p4tPYx5JQfVgoS34d8UL1ldblf7apakjBIrqgZQG6jyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6LpRCF6AJMqfHsQ3ir9vqk6BQJBwUHwta4wyuXG5lPZvyYIFDbw09if/V0aFajaUjG8+V/U6ohhXQFmyKEVLNCnUSwUNBVz8ylzY64SQKXONmJ6Kx5jXEzWHCbu75XUwsNEEgqVlMLBhRwFfFR20VQrknGnVyojM8T5KFyPu5w0=; Message-ID: <152701.26791.qm@web94305.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: nQK4B0YVM1lbYfxc8WjhKS.vB4LgKHahb_6glNDKTzOCJ8Ku9CFSy0AGcfNJTvf0L1_NV8WdyxDFcQ19aUAauDpHit6sbRPUcXLaQSoIQfOlPYaWs0PZgKg3_s1j5MtRN.LHjZGEOm4TBr1O8EuNzIpUi6evrDi_WOsqosuvfl1UtBgEWwjvXirjRb47HkQHkFL8Y6VK772RgGwDGyZitX13sGmlZykfuXXJJg-- Received: from [59.162.59.194] by web94305.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:08:14 IST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.17 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:08:14 +0530 (IST) From: Mohammad Alam To: mmusic@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1904747781-1246855094=:26791" Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:38:05 -0000 --0-1904747781-1246855094=:26791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi I am implementing RTSP server in my application. I want to support non -=A0= aggregation=A0in=A0my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1o= f RFC 2326. I want to=A0implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. there=A0shoul= d be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY=A0and 2=A0TEARDOWN with different session IDs) 1) I want to know what are the changes to be made in sdp.2) How can I have = different session IDs for different media.=A0 alam=0A=0A=0A See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people lik= e you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/ --0-1904747781-1246855094=:26791 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =
Hi

I am implementing RT= SP server in my application. I want to support non - 
aggregation in my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1
o= f RFC 2326. I want to implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. there = ;
should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY and 2=  TEARDOWN with different session IDs)

1) I want to know wha= t are the changes to be made in sdp.
2= ) How can I have different session IDs for different media. 

alam

=0A
See the Web's breaking = stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! B= uzz. --0-1904747781-1246855094=:26791-- From jaehwan@vidiator.com Sun Jul 5 22:04:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DE028C1A7 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:04:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.398 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QequTobu5HAM for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kor1corpmail01.mediator.com (vkimail.vidiator.com [211.189.53.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9E528C1C2 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 22:04:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9FDF7.38D0F475" Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:04:20 +0900 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <152701.26791.qm@web94305.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <152701.26791.qm@web94305.mail.in2.yahoo.com> From: "Jaehwan Kim" To: "Mohammad Alam" , Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:04:16 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FDF7.38D0F475 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C9FDF7.38D0F475" ------_=_NextPart_002_01C9FDF7.38D0F475 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alam, 1/ no change in the sdp. 2/ The decision is made by player. If player uses the same session id in the second SETUP), server will think of it as aggregated control. Therefore, player should not send session id even in the second SETUP. =20 In fact, 2326 has some ambiguity for this, therefore, you can read also 2326bis draft. =20 Regards, Jaehwan =20 From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Alam Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:38 PM To: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation =20 Hi =20 I am implementing RTSP server in my application. I want to support non - aggregation in my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1 of RFC 2326. I want to implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. there=20 should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY and 2 TEARDOWN with different session IDs) =20 1) I want to know what are the changes to be made in sdp. 2) How can I have different session IDs for different media.=20 =20 alam =20 ________________________________ See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out=20 Yahoo! Buzz . ------_=_NextPart_002_01C9FDF7.38D0F475 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Alam,

1/ no change in the sdp.

2/ The decision is made by player. If player uses the = same session id in the second SETUP), server will think of it as aggregated = control. Therefore, player should not send session id even in the second = SETUP.

 

In fact, 2326 has some ambiguity for this, therefore, you = can read also 2326bis draft.

 

Regards,

Jaehwan

 

From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Alam
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:38 PM
To: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation

 

Hi

 

I am implementing RTSP server in my application. I want to support non = - 

aggregation in my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec = 14.1

of RFC 2326. I want to implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. = there 

should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY and 2 TEARDOWN with different session = IDs)

 

1) I want to know what are the changes to be made in sdp.

2) How can I have different session IDs for different = media. 

 

alam

 


See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz.

------_=_NextPart_002_01C9FDF7.38D0F475-- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FDF7.38D0F475 Content-Type: text/plain; name="non-aggregate control example.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: non-aggregate control example.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="non-aggregate control example.txt" REVTQ1JJQkUgcnRzcDovLzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvYWFhLmszZyBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogMQ0K QWNjZXB0OiBhcHBsaWNhdGlvbi9zZHAgDQpBY2NlcHQtTGFuZ3VhZ2U6IGVuLVVTIA0KVXNlci1B Z2VudDogVklESTgwMA0KDQpSVFNQLzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDENCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6 IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6MjI6MDUgR01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZh bGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJpLCA5IE1heSAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjAxIEdNVCANCkV4cGlyZXM6IEZy aSwgMjMgSnVuIDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDEgDQpDb250ZW50LVR5cGU6IGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL3NkcA0K Q29udGVudC1CYXNlOiBydHNwOi8vMTkyLjE2LjExMS4zMy9WSURJL2FhYS5rM2cNCkNvbnRlbnQt TGFuZ3VhZ2U6IGVuLVVTIA0KQ29udGVudC1MZW5ndGg6IDczMiANClNlcnZlcjogVklESV9WT0Qv MS4wDQoNCnY9MCANCm89LSAyNjk5NDcwNDg5IDEwNTEyNDU2MzkgSU4gSVA0IDE5Mi4xNi4xMTEu MzMgDQpzPVZJREkvMQ0KdT13d3cubXl0ZWxlY29tLmNvLmtyDQplPXNlcnZpY2VAbXl0ZWxlY29t LmNvLmtyIA0KYz1JTiBJUDQgMC4wLjAuMCANCnQ9MCAwIA0KYT1jb250cm9sOiBydHNwOi8vMTky LjE2LjExMS4zMy9WSURJL2FhYS5rM2cNCmE9cmFuZ2U6bnB0PTAuMDAwMDAwLTQ2LjQwMDAwMCAg ICAgDQptPWF1ZGlvIDAgUlRQL0FWUCAxMTAgICAgIA0KYj1BUzoxNyAgICAgDQphPXJhbmdlOm5w dD0wLjAwMDAwMC00Ni4yNTQwMDAgICAgIA0KYT1ydHBtYXA6MTEwIE1QNEEtTEFUTS8yMjA1MC8x ICAgICANCmE9Y29udHJvbDp0cmFja0lEPTMxICAgICANCmE9Zm10cDoxMTAgcHJvZmlsZS1sZXZl bC1pZD0xNTtvYmplY3Q9MjtjcHJlc2VudD0wO2NvbmZpZz00MzAwMjcxMDNGQzANCm09dmlkZW8g MCBSVFAvQVZQIDk3ICAgICANCmI9QVM6MzINCmE9cmFuZ2U6bnB0PTAuMDAwMDAwLTQ2LjQwMDAw MCANCmE9WC1EaXNhbGxvd3JhbmRvbWFjY2Vzcw0KYT1ydHBtYXA6OTcgTVA0Vi1FUy81IA0KYT1j b250cm9sOnRyYWNrSUQ9MjEgDQphPWZtdHA6OTcgcHJvZmlsZS1sZXZlbC1pZD04O2NvbmZpZz0w MDAwMDFCMDA4MDAwMDAxQjI1MzQ1NTI0RjRENDUyMDU0NDU0Mw0KNDg0RTRGNEM0RjQ3NTkyMDUy MjY0NDIwNDM0NTRFNTQ0NTUyMjA0RDU1NEM1NDQ5NEQ0NTQ0NDk0MTIwNEM0MQ0KNDIyRTAwMDAw MUI1MDkwMDAwMDEwMDAwMDAwMTIwMDA4NDQwMDE3MzA1ODQxMjE0NDMNCg0KU0VUVVAgcnRzcDov LzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvYWFhLmszZy90cmFja0lEPTIxIFJUU1AvMS4wDQpDU2VxOiAyIFRyYW5z cG9ydDogUlRQL0FWUDt1bmljYXN0O2NsaWVudF9wb3J0PTEzMTAwLTEzMTAxIA0KQmxvY2tzaXpl OiAxNDYwDQpVc2VyLUFnZW50OiBWSURJODAwLzEuMCANCg0KUlRTUC8xLjAgMjAwIE9LDQpDU2Vx OiAyIA0KTGFzdC1Nb2RpZmllZDogVHVlLCAwNCBNYXIgMjAwMyAwNzoyMjowNSBHTVQgDQpDYWNo ZS1Db250cm9sOiBtdXN0LXJldmFsaWRhdGUgDQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIDIzIE1heSAyMDAzIDA1OjU3 OjAzIEdNVCANCkV4cGlyZXM6IEZyaSwgMjMgSnVuIDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDMgR01UIA0KU2Vzc2lv bjogMjU0NTgyMjAxMSANClRyYW5zcG9ydDogUlRQL0FWUDt1bmljYXN0O2NsaWVudF9wb3J0PTEz MTAwLTEzMTAxO3NlcnZlcl9wb3J0PTEyMDAwLTEyMDAxO3NvdXJjZT0xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzO2Rl c3RpbmF0aW9uPTEwLjYwLjI1My4zMTtzc3JjPTc5MGEwODJjIFNlcnZlcjogVklESV9WT0QvMS4w IA0KDQpTRVRVUCBydHNwOi8vMTkyLjE2LjExMS4zMy9WSURJL2FhYS5rM2cvdHJhY2tJRD0zMSBS VFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogMw0KVHJhbnNwb3J0OiBSVFAvQVZQO3VuaWNhc3Q7Y2xpZW50X3BvcnQ9 MTMxMDItMTMxMDMNCkJsb2Nrc2l6ZTogMTQ2MA0KVXNlci1BZ2VudDogVklESTgwMC8xLjAgDQoN ClJUU1AvMS4wIDIwMCBPSw0KQ1NlcTogMyAgICAgICAgDQpMYXN0LU1vZGlmaWVkOiBUdWUsIDA0 IE1hciAyMDAzIDA3OjIyOjA1IEdNVCANCkNhY2hlLUNvbnRyb2w6IG11c3QtcmV2YWxpZGF0ZSAN CkRhdGU6IEZyaSwgMjMgTWF5IDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDQgR01UIA0KRXhwaXJlczogRnJpLCAyMyBK dW4gMjAwMyAwNTo1NzowNCBHTVQgDQpTZXNzaW9uOiAyMDYwNzQzNDE1IA0KVHJhbnNwb3J0OiBS VFAvQVZQO3VuaWNhc3Q7Y2xpZW50X3BvcnQ9MTMxMDItMTMxMDM7c2VydmVyX3BvcnQ9MTIwMDIt MTIwMDM7c291cmNlPTE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzM7ZGVzdGluYXRpb249MTAuNjAuMjUzLjMxO3NzcmM9 YWU5ZjM3NGQgDQoNClBMQVkgcnRzcDovLzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvVklESS9hYWEuazNnIFJUU1Av MS4wDQpDU2VxOiA0IA0KU2Vzc2lvbjogMjU0NTgyMjA2Mg0KVXNlci1BZ2VudDogVklESTgwMC8x LjAgDQoNClJUU1AvMS4wIDIwMCBPSw0KQ1NlcTogNA0KTGFzdC1Nb2RpZmllZDogVHVlLCAwNCBN YXIgMjAwMyAwNzoyMjowNSBHTVQgDQpDYWNoZS1Db250cm9sOiBtdXN0LXJldmFsaWRhdGUgDQpE YXRlOiBGcmksIDIzIE1heSAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjA1IEdNVCANCkV4cGlyZXM6IEZyaSwgMjMgSnVu IDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDUgR01UIA0KU2Vzc2lvbjogMjU0NTgyMjA2Mg0KU2VydmVyOiBWSURJX1ZP RC8xLjANClJhbmdlOiBucHQ9MC4wMDAwLQ0KUlRQLUluZm86ICB1cmw9cnRzcDovLzE5Mi4xNi4x MTEuMzMvVklESS9hYWEuazNnL3RyYWNrSUQ9MjE7c2VxPTE7cnRwdGltZT0wDQoNClBMQVkgcnRz cDovLzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvVklESS9hYWEuazNnIFJUU1AvMS4wDQpDU2VxOiA1IA0KU2Vzc2lv bjogMjA2MDc0MzQxNQ0KVXNlci1BZ2VudDogVklESTgwMC8xLjAgDQoNClJUU1AvMS4wIDIwMCBP Sw0KQ1NlcTogNQ0KTGFzdC1Nb2RpZmllZDogVHVlLCAwNCBNYXIgMjAwMyAwNzoyMjowNSBHTVQg DQpDYWNoZS1Db250cm9sOiBtdXN0LXJldmFsaWRhdGUgDQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIDIzIE1heSAyMDAz IDA1OjU3OjA3IEdNVCANCkV4cGlyZXM6IEZyaSwgMjMgSnVuIDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDcgR01UIA0K U2Vzc2lvbjogMjA2MDc0MzQxNQ0KU2VydmVyOiBWSURJX1ZPRC8xLjANClJhbmdlOiBucHQ9MC4w MDAwLQ0KUlRQLUluZm86ICAgIHVybD1ydHNwOi8vMTkyLjE2LjExMS4zMy9WSURJL2FhYS5rM2cv dHJhY2tJRD0zMTtzZXE9MTtydHB0aW1lPTANCiAgICAgDQoNClBBVVNFIHJ0c3A6Ly8gMTkyLjE2 LjExMS4zMy9WSURJL2FhYS5rM2cvdHJhY2tJRD0yMSBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogNiBTZXNzaW9u OiAyNTQ1ODIyMDYyDQpVc2VyLUFnZW50OiBWSURJODAwLzEuMCANCg0KDQpSVFNQLzEuMCAyMDAg T0sNCkNTZXE6IDYNCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6MjI6MDUgR01U IA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZhbGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJpLCAyMyBNYXkgMjAw MyAwNTo1NzowOCBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVzOiBGcmksIDIzIEp1biAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjA4IEdNVCAN ClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwNjINClJhbmdlOm5wdD0yMy43OTgtDQpTZXJ2ZXI6IFZJRElfVk9E LzEuMA0KDQoNClRFQVJET1dOIHJ0c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZyBSVFNQ LzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogNyANClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwNjINClVzZXItQWdlbnQ6IFZJREk4MDAv MS4wIA0KDQpSVFNQLzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDcNCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6IFR1ZSwgMDQg TWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6MjI6MDUgR01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZhbGlkYXRlIA0K RGF0ZTogRnJpLCAyMyBNYXkgMjAwMyAwNTo1Nzo0NCBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVzOiBGcmksIDIzIEp1 biAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjQ0IEdNVCANClNlcnZlcjogVklESV9WT0QvMS4wDQoNClRFQVJET1dOIHJ0 c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZyBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogOCBTZXNzaW9u OiAyMDYwNzQzNDE1DQpVc2VyLUFnZW50OiBWSURJODAwLzEuMCANCg0KUlRTUC8xLjAgMjAwIE9L DQpDU2VxOiA4DQpMYXN0LU1vZGlmaWVkOiBUdWUsIDA0IE1hciAyMDAzIDA3OjIyOjA1IEdNVCAN CkNhY2hlLUNvbnRyb2w6IG11c3QtcmV2YWxpZGF0ZSANCkRhdGU6IEZyaSwgMjMgTWF5IDIwMDMg MDU6NTc6NDUgR01UIA0KRXhwaXJlczogRnJpLCAyMyBKdW4gMjAwMyAwNTo1Nzo0NSBHTVQgDQpT ZXJ2ZXI6IFZJRElfVk9ELzEuMA0K ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FDF7.38D0F475-- From alam_fresher@yahoo.co.in Sun Jul 5 23:14:21 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DE53A68E8 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:14:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.397 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.207, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uVPHAa1OVslY for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:14:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web94308.mail.in2.yahoo.com (web94308.mail.in2.yahoo.com [203.104.16.218]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8123A68D0 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 23:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11525 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jul 2009 06:14:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1246860875; bh=PWzqJXe3USD9eQRvtT1dD2ll9Vqi0JLZiDBmqzinTto=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AdDDLIsViAfoQzzukKLCFE6k5B37VkiQP/M34bGNI86bvLvzprO78IAhxVO8/r4+H+dHU1gL9cnE58lJm1Sre/2IpqcTzbw4YFf2yA9FAa3AIowB38wRuzPsp5/t+Ej/WGeeKMvHDYnwylo2p5Es7/TxUiXvhVYOoanYlwS3kmI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SIqn7xAoywelU5kE5w0dQ+P0C3OQKUvN3dKpSmiL+aFINE+zxdHSooX4iMsdG8Ip0HGuxXMFm6I8c0mbdIT90L6e0YQXsU4ofiQTvikTQ9TMM1E66mCWu9pRTrTA3zmFDXpUHNX3biN+9aGLc2/28+xZ7OgTFJlsimI9DjjBEvs=; Message-ID: <146403.8987.qm@web94308.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1XeCeT0VM1m90th5aICMpefH74qvk.CeUWKHyuPZsMtTBusa_ei7C_lvGgSX4Dqh01TJciBYnpivyvM8HOeDv6bxJJ5b4ZDQRrmC2qBOpRIh7J.CjPfyAd6WObqEL11_UNHS847t7VWvGYySCl_yWP_7aZXP5iXVcreZ8y67GccwthQ6u7OMvSKrqA-- Received: from [59.162.59.194] by web94308.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:44:34 IST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.17 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:44:34 +0530 (IST) From: Mohammad Alam To: mmusic@ietf.org, Jaehwan Kim MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-918110294-1246860874=:8987" Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:21 -0000 --0-918110294-1246860874=:8987 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi JaehwanCan you name me one open source/freeware RTSP client that support= s=A0non - aggregation.I think VLC and QTSS does not support non - aggregati= on. RegardsAlam --- On Mon, 6/7/09, Jaehwan Kim wrote: From: Jaehwan Kim Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation To: "Mohammad Alam" , mmusic@ietf.org Date: Monday, 6 July, 2009, 10:34 AM =20 =20 =20 Hi Alam,=20 1/ no change in the sdp.=20 2/ The decision is made by player. If player uses the same session id in the second SETUP), server will think of it as aggregated cont= rol. Therefore, player should not send session id even in the second SETUP.=20 =A0=20 In fact, 2326 has some ambiguity for this, therefore, you can read also 2326bis draft.=20 =A0=20 Regards,=20 Jaehwan=20 =A0=20 From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Alam Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:38 PM To: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation=20 =A0=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 Hi=20 =20 =A0=20 =20 =20 I am implementing RTSP server in my application. I want to support non -=A0= =20 =20 =20 aggregation=A0in=A0my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1=20 =20 =20 of RFC 2326. I want to=A0implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. there=A0=20 =20 =20 should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY=A0and 2=A0TEARDOWN with different session IDs)=20 =20 =20 =A0=20 =20 =20 1) I want to know what are the changes to be made in sdp.=20 =20 =20 2) How can I have different session IDs for different media.=A0=20 =20 =20 =A0=20 =20 =20 alam=20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =A0=20 See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buz= z.=20 =20 =0A=0A=0A Looking for local information? Find it on Yahoo! Local http:= //in.local.yahoo.com/ --0-918110294-1246860874=:8987 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jaehwan
Can you name me one open sourc= e/freeware RTSP client that supports 
non - aggregation.
I think VLC and QTSS does not support non - aggregation.
<= br>
Regards
Alam


--- On Mon, 6/7/0= 9, Jaehwan Kim <jaehwan@vidiator.com> wrote:

From: Jaehwan Kim <jaehwan@vidiator.com>
Subjec= t: RE: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation
To: "Mohammad Alam" <alam_fresher@y= ahoo.co.in>, mmusic@ietf.org
Date: Monday, 6 July, 2009, 10:34 AM
=
=20 =20 =20

Hi Alam,

=20

1/ no change in the sdp.

=20

2/ The decision is made by= player. If player uses the same session id in the second SETUP), server will think of it as aggregated cont= rol. Therefore, player should not send session id even in the second SETUP.

=20

 

=20

In fact, 2326 has some amb= iguity for this, therefore, you can read also 2326bis draft.

=20

 

=20

Regards,

=20

Jaehwan

=20

 

=20

From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Alam
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:38 PM
To: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation

=20

 

=20

Hi

=20

 

=20

I am implementing RTSP server in my application. I want to support non -&nbs= p;

=20

aggregation in my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1

=20

of RFC 2326. I want to implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. there =

=20

should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY and 2 TEARDOWN with different session IDs)

=20

 

=20

1) I want to know what are the changes to be made in sdp.

=20

2) How can I have different session IDs for different media. 

=20

 

=20

alam

=20

 

=20

See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz.

=20
=20

=0A
Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8. --0-918110294-1246860874=:8987-- From jaehwan@vidiator.com Mon Jul 6 00:30:29 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4324B3A6C9D for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:30:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.398 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bpu+Lu4zKhHC for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kor1corpmail01.mediator.com (vkimail.vidiator.com [211.189.53.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8533A6C9A for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:30:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19" Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 16:30:44 +0900 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <146403.8987.qm@web94308.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <146403.8987.qm@web94308.mail.in2.yahoo.com> From: "Jaehwan Kim" To: "Mohammad Alam" Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:30:29 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_002_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19" ------_=_NextPart_002_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Alam, Unfortunately, I have no idea, although I have implemented before. Because the majority of RTSP usage looks aggregated control and non-aggregated control seems increasing system complexity, I am also not seeing it nowadays but some Motorola phone supported it in the past.=20 In fact, understanding the meaning of 'session' was one of very difficult things in only 2326 days! =20 Regarding the usage, we thought muting audio channel and a few rich media applications: multiple video, audio and picture streaming(multiple RTSP sessions) in one TCP 'connection'.=20 =20 Can we know what kind of application you think? =20 Regards, Jaehwan p.s. the example is updated. =20 From: Mohammad Alam [mailto:alam_fresher@yahoo.co.in]=20 Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 3:15 PM To: mmusic@ietf.org; Jaehwan Kim Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation =20 Hi Jaehwan Can you name me one open source/freeware RTSP client that supports=20 non - aggregation. I think VLC and QTSS does not support non - aggregation. =20 Regards Alam --- On Mon, 6/7/09, Jaehwan Kim wrote: From: Jaehwan Kim Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation To: "Mohammad Alam" , mmusic@ietf.org Date: Monday, 6 July, 2009, 10:34 AM Hi Alam, 1/ no change in the sdp. 2/ The decision is made by player. If player uses the same session id in the second SETUP), server will think of it as aggregated control. Therefore, player should not send session id even in the second SETUP. =20 In fact, 2326 has some ambiguity for this, therefore, you can read also 2326bis draft. =20 Regards, Jaehwan =20 From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mohammad Alam Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:38 PM To: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation =20 Hi =20 I am implementing RTSP server in my application. I want to support non - aggregation in my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1 of RFC 2326. I want to implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. there=20 should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY and 2 TEARDOWN with different session IDs) =20 1) I want to know what are the changes to be made in sdp. 2) How can I have different session IDs for different media.=20 =20 alam =20 ________________________________ See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out=20 Yahoo! Buzz . =20 ________________________________ Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8 . ------_=_NextPart_002_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Alam,

Unfortunately, I have no idea, although I have = implemented before.

Because the majority of RTSP usage looks aggregated = control and non-aggregated control seems increasing system complexity, I am also not seeing it = nowadays but some Motorola phone supported it in the past.

In fact, understanding the meaning of = ‘session’ was one of very difficult things in only 2326 days!

 

Regarding the usage, we thought muting audio channel and = a few rich media applications: multiple video, audio and picture streaming(multiple = RTSP sessions) in one TCP ‘connection’.

 

Can we know what kind of application you = think?

 

Regards,

Jaehwan

p.s. the example is updated.

 

From: Mohammad Alam [mailto:alam_fresher@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 3:15 PM
To: mmusic@ietf.org; Jaehwan Kim
Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation

 

Hi = Jaehwan

Can you name me one open = source/freeware RTSP client that supports 

non - = aggregation.

I think VLC and QTSS does not = support non - aggregation.

 

Regards

Alam



--- On Mon, 6/7/09, Jaehwan Kim = <jaehwan@vidiator.com> wrote:


From: Jaehwan Kim <jaehwan@vidiator.com>
Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation
To: "Mohammad Alam" <alam_fresher@yahoo.co.in>, mmusic@ietf.org
Date: Monday, 6 July, 2009, 10:34 AM

Hi Alam,

1/ no change in the sdp.

2/ The decision is made by player. If player uses the same session id in = the second SETUP), server will think of it as aggregated control. = Therefore, player should not send session id even in the second = SETUP.

 

In fact, 2326 has some ambiguity for this, therefore, you can read also = 2326bis draft.

 

Regards,

Jaehwan

 

From:= mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of Mohammad Alam
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 1:38 PM
To: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] Non - Aggregation

 

Hi

 

I am implementing RTSP = server in my application. I want to support non = - 

aggregation in my server. There is non-aggregation example in sec 14.1

of RFC 2326. I want to implement the same. (eg. for 2 media. = there 

should be 2 SETUP, 2 PLAY and 2 TEARDOWN with different session = IDs)

 

1) I want to know what = are the changes to be made in sdp.

2) How can I have = different session IDs for different media. 

 

alam

 


See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! = Buzz.

 


Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer = 8.

------_=_NextPart_002_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19-- ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19 Content-Type: text/plain; name="non-aggregate control example.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: non-aggregate control example.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="non-aggregate control example.txt" REVTQ1JJQkUgcnRzcDovLzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvVklESS9hYWEuazNnIFJUU1AvMS4wDQpDU2Vx OiAxDQpBY2NlcHQ6IGFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL3NkcCANCkFjY2VwdC1MYW5ndWFnZTogZW4tVVMgDQpV c2VyLUFnZW50OiBWSURJODAwDQoNClJUU1AvMS4wIDIwMCBPSw0KQ1NlcTogMQ0KTGFzdC1Nb2Rp ZmllZDogVHVlLCAwNCBNYXIgMjAwMyAwNzoyMjowNSBHTVQgDQpDYWNoZS1Db250cm9sOiBtdXN0 LXJldmFsaWRhdGUgDQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIDkgTWF5IDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDEgR01UIA0KRXhwaXJl czogRnJpLCAyMyBKdW4gMjAwMyAwNTo1NzowMSANCkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZTogYXBwbGljYXRpb24v c2RwDQpDb250ZW50LUJhc2U6IHJ0c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZw0KQ29u dGVudC1MYW5ndWFnZTogZW4tVVMgDQpDb250ZW50LUxlbmd0aDogNzMyIA0KU2VydmVyOiBWSURJ X1ZPRC8xLjANCg0Kdj0wIA0Kbz0tIDI2OTk0NzA0ODkgMTA1MTI0NTYzOSBJTiBJUDQgMTkyLjE2 LjExMS4zMyANCnM9VklESS8xDQp1PXd3dy5teXRlbGVjb20uY28ua3INCmU9c2VydmljZUBteXRl bGVjb20uY28ua3IgDQpjPUlOIElQNCAwLjAuMC4wIA0KdD0wIDAgDQphPWNvbnRyb2w6IHJ0c3A6 Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZw0KYT1yYW5nZTpucHQ9MC4wMDAwMDAtNDYuNDAw MDAwICAgICANCm09YXVkaW8gMCBSVFAvQVZQIDExMCAgICAgDQpiPUFTOjE3ICAgICANCmE9cmFu Z2U6bnB0PTAuMDAwMDAwLTQ2LjI1NDAwMCAgICAgDQphPXJ0cG1hcDoxMTAgTVA0QS1MQVRNLzIy MDUwLzEgICAgIA0KYT1jb250cm9sOnRyYWNrSUQ9MzEgICAgIA0KYT1mbXRwOjExMCBwcm9maWxl LWxldmVsLWlkPTE1O29iamVjdD0yO2NwcmVzZW50PTA7Y29uZmlnPTQzMDAyNzEwM0ZDMA0KbT12 aWRlbyAwIFJUUC9BVlAgOTcgICAgIA0KYj1BUzozMg0KYT1yYW5nZTpucHQ9MC4wMDAwMDAtNDYu NDAwMDAwIA0KYT1YLURpc2FsbG93cmFuZG9tYWNjZXNzDQphPXJ0cG1hcDo5NyBNUDRWLUVTLzUg DQphPWNvbnRyb2w6dHJhY2tJRD0yMSANCmE9Zm10cDo5NyBwcm9maWxlLWxldmVsLWlkPTg7Y29u ZmlnPTAwMDAwMUIwMDgwMDAwMDFCMjUzNDU1MjRGNEQ0NTIwNTQ0NTQzDQo0ODRFNEY0QzRGNDc1 OTIwNTIyNjQ0MjA0MzQ1NEU1NDQ1NTIyMDRENTU0QzU0NDk0RDQ1NDQ0OTQxMjA0QzQxDQo0MjJF MDAwMDAxQjUwOTAwMDAwMTAwMDAwMDAxMjAwMDg0NDAwMTczMDU4NDEyMTQ0Mw0KDQpTRVRVUCBy dHNwOi8vMTkyLjE2LjExMS4zMy9WSURJL2FhYS5rM2cvdHJhY2tJRD0yMSBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1Nl cTogMiBUcmFuc3BvcnQ6IFJUUC9BVlA7dW5pY2FzdDtjbGllbnRfcG9ydD0xMzEwMC0xMzEwMSAN CkJsb2Nrc2l6ZTogMTQ2MA0KVXNlci1BZ2VudDogVklESTgwMC8xLjAgDQoNClJUU1AvMS4wIDIw MCBPSw0KQ1NlcTogMiANCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6MjI6MDUg R01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZhbGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJpLCAyMyBNYXkg MjAwMyAwNTo1NzowMyBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVzOiBGcmksIDIzIEp1biAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjAzIEdN VCANClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwMTEgDQpUcmFuc3BvcnQ6IFJUUC9BVlA7dW5pY2FzdDtjbGll bnRfcG9ydD0xMzEwMC0xMzEwMTtzZXJ2ZXJfcG9ydD0xMjAwMC0xMjAwMTtzb3VyY2U9MTkyLjE2 LjExMS4zMztkZXN0aW5hdGlvbj0xMC42MC4yNTMuMzE7c3NyYz03OTBhMDgyYyBTZXJ2ZXI6IFZJ RElfVk9ELzEuMCANCg0KU0VUVVAgcnRzcDovLzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvVklESS9hYWEuazNnL3Ry YWNrSUQ9MzEgUlRTUC8xLjANCkNTZXE6IDMNClRyYW5zcG9ydDogUlRQL0FWUDt1bmljYXN0O2Ns aWVudF9wb3J0PTEzMTAyLTEzMTAzDQpCbG9ja3NpemU6IDE0NjANClVzZXItQWdlbnQ6IFZJREk4 MDAvMS4wIA0KDQpSVFNQLzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDMgICAgICAgIA0KTGFzdC1Nb2RpZmll ZDogVHVlLCAwNCBNYXIgMjAwMyAwNzoyMjowNSBHTVQgDQpDYWNoZS1Db250cm9sOiBtdXN0LXJl dmFsaWRhdGUgDQpEYXRlOiBGcmksIDIzIE1heSAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjA0IEdNVCANCkV4cGlyZXM6 IEZyaSwgMjMgSnVuIDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6MDQgR01UIA0KU2Vzc2lvbjogMjA2MDc0MzQxNSANClRy YW5zcG9ydDogUlRQL0FWUDt1bmljYXN0O2NsaWVudF9wb3J0PTEzMTAyLTEzMTAzO3NlcnZlcl9w b3J0PTEyMDAyLTEyMDAzO3NvdXJjZT0xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzO2Rlc3RpbmF0aW9uPTEwLjYwLjI1 My4zMTtzc3JjPWFlOWYzNzRkIA0KDQpQTEFZIHJ0c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFh LmszZyBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogNCANClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwNjINClVzZXItQWdlbnQ6 IFZJREk4MDAvMS4wIA0KDQpSVFNQLzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDQNCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6 IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6MjI6MDUgR01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZh bGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJpLCAyMyBNYXkgMjAwMyAwNTo1NzowNSBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVzOiBG cmksIDIzIEp1biAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjA1IEdNVCANClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwNjINClNlcnZl cjogVklESV9WT0QvMS4wDQpSYW5nZTogbnB0PTAuMDAwMC0NClJUUC1JbmZvOiAgdXJsPXJ0c3A6 Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZy90cmFja0lEPTIxO3NlcT0xO3J0cHRpbWU9MA0K DQpQTEFZIHJ0c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZyBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTog NSANClNlc3Npb246IDIwNjA3NDM0MTUNClVzZXItQWdlbnQ6IFZJREk4MDAvMS4wIA0KDQpSVFNQ LzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDUNCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6 MjI6MDUgR01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZhbGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJpLCAy MyBNYXkgMjAwMyAwNTo1NzowNyBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVzOiBGcmksIDIzIEp1biAyMDAzIDA1OjU3 OjA3IEdNVCANClNlc3Npb246IDIwNjA3NDM0MTUNClNlcnZlcjogVklESV9WT0QvMS4wDQpSYW5n ZTogbnB0PTAuMDAwMC0NClJUUC1JbmZvOiAgICB1cmw9cnRzcDovLzE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvVklE SS9hYWEuazNnL3RyYWNrSUQ9MzE7c2VxPTE7cnRwdGltZT0wDQogICAgIA0KDQpQQVVTRSBydHNw Oi8vIDE5Mi4xNi4xMTEuMzMvVklESS9hYWEuazNnL3RyYWNrSUQ9MjEgUlRTUC8xLjANCkNTZXE6 IDYgDQpTZXNzaW9uOiAyNTQ1ODIyMDYyDQpVc2VyLUFnZW50OiBWSURJODAwLzEuMCANCg0KDQpS VFNQLzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDYNCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZpZWQ6IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMg MDc6MjI6MDUgR01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1yZXZhbGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJp LCAyMyBNYXkgMjAwMyAwNTo1NzowOCBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVzOiBGcmksIDIzIEp1biAyMDAzIDA1 OjU3OjA4IEdNVCANClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwNjINClJhbmdlOm5wdD0yMy43OTgtDQpTZXJ2 ZXI6IFZJRElfVk9ELzEuMA0KDQoNClRFQVJET1dOIHJ0c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkv YWFhLmszZyBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1NlcTogNyANClNlc3Npb246IDI1NDU4MjIwNjINClVzZXItQWdl bnQ6IFZJREk4MDAvMS4wIA0KDQpSVFNQLzEuMCAyMDAgT0sNCkNTZXE6IDcNCkxhc3QtTW9kaWZp ZWQ6IFR1ZSwgMDQgTWFyIDIwMDMgMDc6MjI6MDUgR01UIA0KQ2FjaGUtQ29udHJvbDogbXVzdC1y ZXZhbGlkYXRlIA0KRGF0ZTogRnJpLCAyMyBNYXkgMjAwMyAwNTo1Nzo0NCBHTVQgDQpFeHBpcmVz OiBGcmksIDIzIEp1biAyMDAzIDA1OjU3OjQ0IEdNVCANClNlcnZlcjogVklESV9WT0QvMS4wDQoN ClRFQVJET1dOIHJ0c3A6Ly8xOTIuMTYuMTExLjMzL1ZJREkvYWFhLmszZyBSVFNQLzEuMA0KQ1Nl cTogOCBTZXNzaW9uOiAyMDYwNzQzNDE1DQpVc2VyLUFnZW50OiBWSURJODAwLzEuMCANCg0KUlRT UC8xLjAgMjAwIE9LDQpDU2VxOiA4DQpMYXN0LU1vZGlmaWVkOiBUdWUsIDA0IE1hciAyMDAzIDA3 OjIyOjA1IEdNVCANCkNhY2hlLUNvbnRyb2w6IG11c3QtcmV2YWxpZGF0ZSANCkRhdGU6IEZyaSwg MjMgTWF5IDIwMDMgMDU6NTc6NDUgR01UIA0KRXhwaXJlczogRnJpLCAyMyBKdW4gMjAwMyAwNTo1 Nzo0NSBHTVQgDQpTZXJ2ZXI6IFZJRElfVk9ELzEuMA0K ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE0B.ACB51A19-- From Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com Mon Jul 6 00:32:49 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377F53A6CC4 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:32:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1XUzNsegGg6p for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD6D3A6CB8 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 00:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id n667WsYj009191; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:33:11 -0500 Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:32:18 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:32:13 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) with mapi; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:32:12 +0200 From: To: , Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:32:11 +0200 Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt Thread-Index: AcnvvNGDfqgSPD1LTIy0U6kWSQ3DnwALblwgAT0mzbACSyj8EA== Message-ID: References: <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0021057BC@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0021057BC@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2009 07:32:13.0219 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1256730:01C9FE0B] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 07:32:49 -0000 =20 >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com]=20 >Sent: 24 June, 2009 18:21 >To: Veikkolainen Simo (Nokia-D/Helsinki); mmusic@ietf.org >Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt > >Simo, > >I think the Security Considerations section should remind=20 >people that it is not possible to secure the media (SRTP is=20 >not available). I can add a comment to that effect in the next version. Thanks Simo > >John=20 > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of=20 >> Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com >> Sent: 18 June 2009 09:00 >> To: mmusic@ietf.org >> Subject: [MMUSIC] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt >>=20 >> We submitted a new version of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs which=20 >adds some=20 >> text to address John's comments on how to behave when no correlation=20 >> information is received in the CS call setup, and on security=20 >> considerations. >>=20 >> Further comments are very welcome! >>=20 >> Regards, >> Simo >>=20 >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org >> >[mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext=20 >> >Internet-Drafts@ietf.org >> >Sent: 18 June, 2009 05:30 >> >To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >> >Cc: mmusic@ietf.org >> >Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt >> > >> >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts=20 >> >directories. >> >This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session=20 >> >Control Working Group of the IETF. >> > >> > Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP)=20 >> >Extension For Setting Up Audio Media Streams Over Circuit-Switched=20 >> >Bearers In The Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) >> > Author(s) : M. Garcia-Martin, S. Veikkolainen >> > Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt >> > Pages : 25 >> > Date : 2009-6-17 >> >=09 >> >This memo describes use cases, requirements, and protocol extensions >> > for using the Session Description Protocol (SDP) >> Offer/Answer model >> > for establishing audio media stream over circuit-switched >> bearers in >> > the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). >> > >> >A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01.txt >> > >> >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> > >> >Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader=20 >> >implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the=20 >> >Internet-Draft. >> > >>=20 >= From Sebastian.Kiesel@nw.neclab.eu Mon Jul 6 02:36:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFAE3A6AC0 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:36:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.542 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPHz78sLCOYC for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD9C3A6BE0 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A138F2C020493 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:35:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office) Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hWzh48tdVmFy for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:35:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from VENUS.office (mx2.office [192.168.24.15]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834A02C0004E5 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:35:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from foo.nw.neclab.eu ([10.1.6.240]) by VENUS.office with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:35:30 +0200 Received: by foo.nw.neclab.eu (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:35:28 +0200 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:35:28 +0200 From: Sebastian Kiesel To: mmusic@ietf.org Message-ID: <20090706093528.GB23176@foo.nw.neclab.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2009 09:35:30.0530 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A497C20:01C9FE1D] Subject: [MMUSIC] fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kiesel-mmusic-firewall-sip-00 X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:36:16 -0000 Dear MMUSIC WG members, (announcement sent to NSIS and MMUSIC lists) The IETF has worked on several architectures and protocols for dynamic control of firewalls, namely MIDCOM and NSIS. This draft examines how they work together with SIP, especially if something goes wrong. The conclusion is basically that the normal SIP mechanisms are not sufficient to handle all error conditions in a reasonable way, and therefore a new SIP precondition should be standardized. Feedback and discussion are welcome. Thanks, Sebastian ----- Forwarded message from IETF I-D Submission Tool ----- From: IETF I-D Submission Tool To: sebastian.kiesel@nw.neclab.eu Subject: New Version Notification for draft-kiesel-mmusic-firewall-sip-00 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 01:26:17 -0700 (PDT) A new version of I-D, draft-kiesel-mmusic-firewall-sip-00.txt has been successfuly submitted by Sebastian Kiesel and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-kiesel-mmusic-firewall-sip Revision: 00 Title: Interaction of dynamic firewall control protocols and SIP Creation_date: 2009-07-06 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 21 Abstract: SIP-based multimedia applications dynamically negotiate parameters for the related media streams, such as UDP port numbers. Therefore, firewalls that want to inspect these streams have to interact with the session signaling. Several architectures and protocols have been developed for the dynamic control of firewalls on the media path, e. g., MIDCOM, SIMCO, and the NSIS NAT/FW NSLP. This document investigates problems with the interaction of standard SIP (as of RFC 3261) and these firewall control protocols, especially with respect to error handling. It will be pointed out how existing SIP extensions can be used for improving the interaction, and which additional mechanisms need to be specified. While the actual specification of such additional mechanisms is out of the scope of this document, it solicits feedback and discussion. The IETF Secretariat. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Sebastian Kiesel mailto:sebastian.kiesel@nw.neclab.eu Network Research Division tel:+49-6221-4342-232 fax:+49-6221-4342-155 NEC Laboratories Europe Kurfuerstenanlage 36, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany -- NEC Europe Limited Registered in England 2832014 Registered Office NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL From mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com Mon Jul 6 04:45:48 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7DA28C272; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:45:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.044 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.044 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wT7P2w8RymYy; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from R-MAIL1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83F43A6A1C; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 04:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:44:01 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE2F.0E1FF4E3" Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:44:00 +0200 Message-ID: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LA From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2009 11:44:01.0680 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E7D9900:01C9FE2F] Subject: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:45:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE2F.0E1FF4E3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Dear all, This draft has been submitted.=20 Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org = [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de = Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Envoy=E9 : lundi 6 juillet 2009 11:45 =C0 : i-d-announce@ietf.org Objet : I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt=20 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Connectivity = Capability (CCAP) Attribute Author(s) : M. Boucadair, H. Kaplan Filename : draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2009-07-06 This memo proposes a mechanism which allows to carry multiple IP = addresses, of different address families (e.g., IPv4, IPv6), in the same = SDP offer/answer. The proposed attribute solves the backward = compatibility problem which plagued ANAT, due to its syntax. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader = implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the = Internet-Draft. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE2F.0E1FF4E3 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.URL" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.URL Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.URL" W0ludGVybmV0U2hvcnRjdXRdDQpVUkw9ZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0 cy9kcmFmdC1ib3VjYWRhaXItbW11c2ljLWNjYXAtMDAudHh0DQo= ------_=_NextPart_001_01C9FE2F.0E1FF4E3-- From abegen@cisco.com Mon Jul 6 06:54:56 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277913A6C57 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:54:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CVbv1XXplPmC for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3886D28C266 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:54:21 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,356,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="338376546" Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2009 13:53:06 +0000 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n66Dr6s7011298; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:53:06 -0700 Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n66Dr6Vp005802; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:53:06 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:53:06 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:51:36 -0700 Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D5409A72B69@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: WGLC request for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02 Thread-Index: Acn+QOFcRbxYQnz3RVqRXKqoL4ZpUw== From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" To: , "Joerg Ott" , "Jean-Francois Mule" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2009 13:53:06.0374 (UTC) FILETIME=[16B01E60:01C9FE41] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=379; t=1246888386; x=1247752386; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Ali=20C.=20Begen=20(abegen)=22=20 |Subject:=20WGLC=20request=20for=20draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc475 6bis-02 |Sender:=20; bh=UWpRaEfnL2mRRRlwbBYE1Yf7qH6dz2xTXEnrwS9ngbA=; b=FEjkoqfPkRZIVB4Vddkib4t5sXKMN7Q3JjY0pVXt5b7U2CesBBQolQopYP YYmBph5H07gZkKwaLqCS+cJaQV3z3W1EDMxMwef5EZcvsiLO31KwbiwfPRuO eZYsnZ4n4d; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=abegen@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); Subject: [MMUSIC] WGLC request for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02 X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:54:56 -0000 Hello, I would like to request WGLC for the following draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02.txt This draft is dependant on the source-specific media attributes in SDP, = which recently became an RFC (5576) and the current version addressed = all the outstanding issues. This draft is needed by the FECframe WG. Thanks. -acbegen From jf.mule@cablelabs.com Mon Jul 6 07:46:08 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2DB28C276 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:46:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.235 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ad1Ll7eXq58x for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550753A6B80 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 07:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n66Edpa6011595; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:39:51 -0600 Received: from srvxchg3.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.25) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:39:50 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:38:08 -0600 Message-ID: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C601EED999@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D5409A72B69@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: WGLC request for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02 Thread-Index: Acn+QOFcRbxYQnz3RVqRXKqoL4ZpUwABfiBA References: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D5409A72B69@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> From: "Jean-Francois Mule" To: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" , , "Joerg Ott" X-Approved: ondar Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC request for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02 X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:46:08 -0000 Ali, Ok, noted, will send a separate WGLC announcement.=20 We have at least 3 drafts that need to go through WGLC but given the FECframe dependency, we'll expedite this one. Can you ping one or two folks involved in fecframe that would be willing to formally review the doc during WGLC? Jean-Francois =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ali C. Begen (abegen) [mailto:abegen@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 7:52 AM > To: mmusic@ietf.org; Joerg Ott; Jean-Francois Mule > Subject: WGLC request for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-02 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I would like to request WGLC for the following draft: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis- > 02.txt >=20 > This draft is dependant on the source-specific media attributes in > SDP, which recently became an RFC (5576) and the current version > addressed all the outstanding issues. This draft is needed by the > FECframe WG. >=20 > Thanks. > -acbegen From HKaplan@acmepacket.com Mon Jul 6 22:07:52 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651283A6DF4; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:07:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.484 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1JX9gbFFEt9; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E493D3A6A57; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 22:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:06:24 -0400 Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:06:22 -0400 From: Hadriel Kaplan To: "mmusic@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 01:06:16 -0400 Thread-Topic: A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBA= Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "sipping@ietf.org" , "dispatch@ietf.org" Subject: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:07:52 -0000 BTW, this draft was submitted in response to the discussion around the need= for an ANAT-type model that was backwards-compatible, and for a v4/v6 stac= k option-tag indicator, which was a topic of discussion on SIPPING back in = February and March. That thread started with: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg16718.html -hadriel p.s. sorry about the cross-posting, but SIPPING is effectively closed (righ= t?) so it's hard to know where to post such notices which are tightly relat= ed to SIP. > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 7:44 AM >=20 > Dear all, >=20 > This draft has been submitted. >=20 > Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Med >=20 >=20 > -----Message d'origine----- > De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] > De la part de Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > Envoy=E9 : lundi 6 juillet 2009 11:45 > =C0 : i-d-announce@ietf.org > Objet : I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. >=20 > Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Connectivity > Capability (CCAP) Attribute > Author(s) : M. Boucadair, H. Kaplan > Filename : draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2009-07-06 >=20 > This memo proposes a mechanism which allows to carry multiple IP > addresses, of different address families (e.g., IPv4, IPv6), in the same > SDP offer/answer. The proposed attribute solves the backward > compatibility problem which plagued ANAT, due to its syntax. >=20 > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. From Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com Tue Jul 7 04:23:07 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB43A6E59 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:23:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o+S0cfCdptnG for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx06.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C547C3A6899 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-mx06.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id n67BMUeD019700; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:22:48 +0300 Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:22:50 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:22:45 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:44 +0200 From: To: , Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:22:44 +0200 Thread-Topic: A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgA== Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jul 2009 11:22:45.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[406D3030:01C9FEF5] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:23:07 -0000 [Dropping dispatch and sipping.] >-----Original Message----- >From: sipping-bounces@ietf.org=20 >[mailto:sipping-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Hadriel Kaplan >Sent: 07 July, 2009 08:06 >To: mmusic@ietf.org >Cc: sipping@ietf.org; dispatch@ietf.org >Subject: [Sipping] A replacement for ANAT > > >BTW, this draft was submitted in response to the discussion=20 >around the need for an ANAT-type model that was=20 >backwards-compatible, and for a v4/v6 stack option-tag=20 >indicator, which was a topic of discussion on SIPPING back in=20 >February and March. That thread started with: >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg16718.html Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken a look at http:= //tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, which also defin= es a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we are planning to submit = an updated version soon (with minimal changes). Regards, Simo > >-hadriel >p.s. sorry about the cross-posting, but SIPPING is effectively=20 >closed (right?) so it's hard to know where to post such=20 >notices which are tightly related to SIP. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On=20 >> Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 7:44 AM >>=20 >> Dear all, >>=20 >> This draft has been submitted. >>=20 >> Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. >>=20 >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Med >>=20 >>=20 >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org=20 >> [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] >> De la part de Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Envoy=E9 : lundi 6 juillet 2009=20 >> 11:45 =C0 : i-d-announce@ietf.org Objet : I-D=20 >> Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >>=20 >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts=20 >> directories. >>=20 >> Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP)=20 >Connectivity >> Capability (CCAP) Attribute >> Author(s) : M. Boucadair, H. Kaplan >> Filename : draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >> Pages : 14 >> Date : 2009-07-06 >>=20 >> This memo proposes a mechanism which allows to carry multiple IP=20 >> addresses, of different address families (e.g., IPv4, IPv6), in the=20 >> same SDP offer/answer. The proposed attribute solves the backward=20 >> compatibility problem which plagued ANAT, due to its syntax. >>=20 >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>=20 >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >>=20 >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>=20 >> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader=20 >> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the=20 >> Internet-Draft. >_______________________________________________ >Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping >This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use=20 >sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip=20 >Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP >= From mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com Tue Jul 7 05:51:35 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE553A6E5C for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:51:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.446 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.803, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TeM8RjzL5E9c for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from R-MAIL2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E1F3A6E5A for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:50:42 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1369319@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAADU37A References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> From: To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jul 2009 12:50:42.0113 (UTC) FILETIME=[8958FB10:01C9FF01] Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:51:35 -0000 =20 Dear Simo, Thank you for this information. I'm not aware about this draft. We need to check together if we have the same definition and usage of = the ccap attribute. Cheers, Med -----Message d'origine----- De : mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] De la part = de Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com Envoy=E9 : mardi 7 juillet 2009 13:23 =C0 : HKaplan@acmepacket.com; mmusic@ietf.org Objet : Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT [Dropping dispatch and sipping.] >-----Original Message----- >From: sipping-bounces@ietf.org >[mailto:sipping-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Hadriel Kaplan >Sent: 07 July, 2009 08:06 >To: mmusic@ietf.org >Cc: sipping@ietf.org; dispatch@ietf.org >Subject: [Sipping] A replacement for ANAT > > >BTW, this draft was submitted in response to the discussion around the=20 >need for an ANAT-type model that was backwards-compatible, and for a=20 >v4/v6 stack option-tag indicator, which was a topic of discussion on=20 >SIPPING back in February and March. That thread started with: >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipping/current/msg16718.html Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken a look at = http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, which = also defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we are = planning to submit an updated version soon (with minimal changes). Regards, Simo > >-hadriel >p.s. sorry about the cross-posting, but SIPPING is effectively closed=20 >(right?) so it's hard to know where to post such notices which are=20 >tightly related to SIP. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On=20 >> Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 7:44 AM >>=20 >> Dear all, >>=20 >> This draft has been submitted. >>=20 >> Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. >>=20 >>=20 >> Cheers, >> Med >>=20 >>=20 >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] >> De la part de Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Envoy=E9 : lundi 6 juillet = 2009 >> 11:45 =C0 : i-d-announce@ietf.org Objet : I-D=20 >> Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >>=20 >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts=20 >> directories. >>=20 >> Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP)=20 >Connectivity >> Capability (CCAP) Attribute >> Author(s) : M. Boucadair, H. Kaplan >> Filename : draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >> Pages : 14 >> Date : 2009-07-06 >>=20 >> This memo proposes a mechanism which allows to carry multiple IP=20 >> addresses, of different address families (e.g., IPv4, IPv6), in the=20 >> same SDP offer/answer. The proposed attribute solves the backward=20 >> compatibility problem which plagued ANAT, due to its syntax. >>=20 >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >>=20 >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >>=20 >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>=20 >> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader=20 >> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the=20 >> Internet-Draft. >_______________________________________________ >Sipping mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping >This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use=20 >sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use=20 >sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP > _______________________________________________ mmusic mailing list mmusic@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic From rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Tue Jul 7 16:09:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122513A6E59; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:09:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -16.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST=-15] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTNv31eIBNxg; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bosco.isi.edu (bosco.isi.edu [128.9.168.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8863A6A99; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bosco.isi.edu (Postfix, from userid 70) id 69B7C2E750D; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:06:06 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20090707230606.69B7C2E750D@bosco.isi.edu> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [MMUSIC] RFC 5583 on Signaling Media Decoding Dependency in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:09:16 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5583 Title: Signaling Media Decoding Dependency in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) Author: T. Schierl, S. Wenger Status: Standards Track Date: July 2009 Mailbox: ts@thomas-schierl.de, stewe@stewe.org Pages: 18 Characters: 40214 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-mmusic-decoding-dependency-08.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5583.txt This memo defines semantics that allow for signaling the decoding dependency of different media descriptions with the same media type in the Session Description Protocol (SDP). This is required, for example, if media data is separated and transported in different network streams as a result of the use of a layered or multiple descriptive media coding process. A new grouping type "DDP" -- decoding dependency -- is defined, to be used in conjunction with RFC 3388 entitled "Grouping of Media Lines in the Session Description Protocol". In addition, an attribute is specified describing the relationship of the media streams in a "DDP" group indicated by media identification attribute(s) and media format description(s). [STANDARDS TRACK] This document is a product of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team USC/Information Sciences Institute From HKaplan@acmepacket.com Tue Jul 7 20:00:32 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93093A6A48 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:00:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.492 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FSiXHp6GAm94 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16B23A6955 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:00:57 -0400 Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:00:57 -0400 From: Hadriel Kaplan To: "Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com" , "mmusic@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:00:57 -0400 Thread-Topic: A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAAgkgEA Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:00:32 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com [mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 7:23 AM >=20 > Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken a look at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, which als= o > defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we are planning to > submit an updated version soon (with minimal changes). Heh, that's funny - nope hadn't seen that draft before. =20 The concepts are obviously similar, though different in the following ways: 1) The boucadair draft does not to tie the ccap concept to sdp-cap-neg in a= ny way. Specifically, we did not want to make implementers have to support= sdp-cap-neg just to offer alternate addresses for v4/v6. Sdp-cap-neg is a= fairly complex mechanism for people who don't need it. 2) We assumed in the boucadair draft that a host could not necessarily use = the same UDP/TCP/etc. port numbers for the alternate address, since they're= different number spaces, so we include the port number in the ccap attribu= te. 3) Since we include the port number in the ccap in the boucadair draft, and= the port number is specific to the media line, we do not allow the ccap at= the session level - only the media level. 4) The boucadair draft is for the alternate address/port connection concept= only, and not for any other capabilities. This was done on purpose, becau= se the only goal was to have a workable replacement model for ANAT for v4/v= 6, so we wanted any claims of compliance to the draft to be for the specifi= c support of ccap. -hadriel From Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com Wed Jul 8 02:43:34 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C23A6E87 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:43:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTRGXyyirsWy for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B9E3A6A05 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 02:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id n689hOiY028756; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 04:43:28 -0500 Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:43:20 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:43:15 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:43:14 +0200 From: To: , Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:43:13 +0200 Thread-Topic: A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAAgkgEAAA5LAuA= Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2009 09:43:15.0624 (UTC) FILETIME=[8454B280:01C9FFB0] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:43:34 -0000 =20 >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:HKaplan@acmepacket.com]=20 >Sent: 08 July, 2009 06:01 >To: Veikkolainen Simo (Nokia-D/Helsinki); mmusic@ietf.org >Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com >Subject: RE: A replacement for ANAT > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com=20 >[mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 7:23 AM >>=20 >> Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken=20 >a look at=20 >>=20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, which=20 >> also defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we are=20 >> planning to submit an updated version soon (with minimal changes). > >Heh, that's funny - nope hadn't seen that draft before. =20 > >The concepts are obviously similar, though different in the=20 >following ways: >1) The boucadair draft does not to tie the ccap concept to=20 >sdp-cap-neg in any way. Specifically, we did not want to make=20 >implementers have to support sdp-cap-neg just to offer=20 >alternate addresses for v4/v6. Sdp-cap-neg is a fairly=20 >complex mechanism for people who don't need it. > >2) We assumed in the boucadair draft that a host could not=20 >necessarily use the same UDP/TCP/etc. port numbers for the=20 >alternate address, since they're different number spaces, so=20 >we include the port number in the ccap attribute. > >3) Since we include the port number in the ccap in the=20 >boucadair draft, and the port number is specific to the media=20 >line, we do not allow the ccap at the session level - only the=20 >media level. > >4) The boucadair draft is for the alternate address/port=20 >connection concept only, and not for any other capabilities. =20 >This was done on purpose, because the only goal was to have a=20 >workable replacement model for ANAT for v4/v6, so we wanted=20 >any claims of compliance to the draft to be for the specific=20 >support of ccap. The ccap attribute as defined in the boucadair draft seems to borrow its sy= ntax from sdp cap-neg, but is otherwise totally independent; but I guess th= is was your intention. Actually, you probably could remove any references t= o sdp-cap-neg without losing any of the functionality you have described.=20 You could use the definitions in draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap for the a= ddress capability part, but you would still need the port number indicated = as a capability. This is not defined currently in any of the related drafts= (sdp-cap-neg, sdp-media-capabilities, sdp-misc-cap).=20 Simo >-hadriel >= From jf.mule@cablelabs.com Wed Jul 8 07:00:49 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE3E3A6B69 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:00:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.258 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.205, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfejRE0MfnT2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07033A6B65 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:00:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n68DxXHZ007451 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:33 -0600 Received: from srvxchg3.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.25) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:33 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 07:59:16 -0600 Message-ID: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C601EEDAA0@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: MMUSIC agenda for IETF#75 - call for additional agenda items Thread-Index: Acn/1Eg5Gzg8eotZSeKgf/0moAV17g== From: "Jean-Francois Mule" To: X-Approved: ondar Subject: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC agenda for IETF#75 - call for additional agenda items X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:00:49 -0000 Hi, We have received a couple of requests for agenda time during the MMUSIC WG meeting at IETF#75. Let Joerg and I know if you need time and how much. We will post our agenda on Friday 7/10. Thank you, Jean-Francois THURSDAY, July 30, 2009 0900-1130 Morning Session I Congresshall B INT l2vpn Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks WG Cabaret INT savi Source Address Validation Improvements WG Room 300 OPS capwap Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points WG Room 307 RAI mediactrl Media Server Control WG Congresshall C RAI mmusic Multiparty Multimedia Session Control WG Congresshall A RTG sidr Secure Inter-Domain Routing WG Large Stage SEC keyprov Provisioning of Symmetric Keys WG Small Stage TSV nfsv4 Network File System Version 4 WG From jaehwan@vidiator.com Thu Jul 9 02:34:47 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3447E3A6A5E; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:34:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.601, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aNZZTbtp8Z84; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:34:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kor1corpmail01.mediator.com (vkimail.vidiator.com [211.189.53.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BC73A67B3; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:34:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:35:10 +0900 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20090619133001.9387C3A69C5@core3.amsl.com> References: <20090619133001.9387C3A69C5@core3.amsl.com> From: "Jaehwan Kim" To: , Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:34:47 -0000 Hi, It seems that the biggest change is 'DVD Player remote control' because I always introduced people RTSP as a TV remote control protocol. And I would like to share some my comments, originally written for my better understanding, if you don't mind. >(Page18) When the server is notifying the client about the end of the media delivery requested using PLAY, it sends a PLAY_NOTIFY request to the client.=20 [jh]The right intention looks "When the server wants to notify the client about the end of the media delivery, it can send a PLAY_NOTIFY..." >(Page18) The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes information about the last RTP sequence numbers for each stream, and thus enables correct handling of the buffer drainage at the end. [jh] How about this? "The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes the last RTP sequence number for each stream to help the player to empty the buffer smoothly." >(Page19) For video is possible to manipulate the number of frames that is displayed per second, but... [jh] This part could be enhanced like below. Correct me if I am wrong. Some 'this' are ambiguous to me. "For video, it is possible to manipulate the framerate on the fly, although the randering capabilities are often limited to certain frame rates. And the allowed contents bitrate also limits the modification of the framerate. Therefore, basically fast forward feature could be implemented in this regards in which some subset of the frames from the original content could be picked up. However, the result of this way would be different from the video encoding methods. Due to the media characteristics, possible scale ratios is commonly limited. To signal right scale ratio information, RTSP has a way of indicating the supported Scale ratios for the content. To support aggregated or dynamic content, where the scale may change during the session and this change is dependent on the location within the content, a mechanism for updating the media properties and the currently used scale factor exists." >(Page20) Speed affects how much of=20 [jh] I think this parts overally should be re-reviewed. Or I would revisit here again later. >(Page25) transport. A message is either a Request or a Response. Message Body: The information transferred as the payload of a message. A message body consists of meta-information in the (snip) [jh] the expression, "either a request or a response" should be in the message body. It helps RTSP implementers to consider message body even in the request which is not common in basic operation. Therefore, rather the original sentence in draft20 looks better. And I think "The information transferred as the payload of a request or response." could be rephrased to "The contents of the message without the message header in either RTSP request or response message." >(Page141) The server SHALL respond if the session is in playing state with the Range header filled in with the current playback point and with the corresponding RTP-Info values. [jh] Original one looks more clear. It would be enhanced like below, though. "The server SHALL respond if the session is in playing state. Then, that response MUST have RTP-Info value which is corresponding to the given Range value." >(Page250)=20 S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0 CSeq: 45 Notify-Reason: end-of-stream Request-Status: cseq=3D4 status=3D200 reason=3D"OK" Range: npt=3D-15 RTP-Info:url=3D"rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack" ssrc=3D0D12F123:seq=3D49;rtptime=3D39200 Session: abcdefgh C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK CSeq: 854 User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2 [jh] CSeq looks mismatched.=20 Regards, Jaehwan Vidiator -----Original Message----- From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:30 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. Title : Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP) Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt Pages : 283 Date : 2009-06-19 This memorandum defines RTSP version 2.0 which obsoletes RTSP version 1.0 which is defined in RFC 2326. The Real Time Streaming Protocol, or RTSP, is an application-level protocol for setup and control of the delivery of data with real-time properties. RTSP provides an extensible framework to enable controlled, on-demand delivery of real-time data, such as audio and video. Sources of data can include both live data feeds and stored clips. This protocol is intended to control multiple data delivery sessions, provide a means for choosing delivery channels such as UDP, multicast UDP and TCP, and provide a means for choosing delivery mechanisms based upon RTP (RFC 3550). A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. From thomas.stach@siemens-enterprise.com Thu Jul 9 07:59:31 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9193A6B76 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:59:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.694 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.735, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5jYC7opi8sB for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mxs2.siemens.at (mxs2.siemens.at [194.138.12.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B335D3A6C9D for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 07:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vies1kbx.sie.siemens.at ([158.226.129.82]) by mxs2.siemens.at with ESMTP id n69F05LL012637; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:00:05 +0200 Received: from nets139a.ww300.siemens.net ([192.168.217.3]) by vies1kbx.sie.siemens.at (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.1) with ESMTP id n69Exrrc015741; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:59:53 +0200 Received: from atnets1aka.ww300.siemens.net ([158.226.238.99]) by nets139a.ww300.siemens.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:59:52 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:59:51 +0200 Message-ID: <65A25F4A9EA17343A44B0456FBE6217DB135BA@nets11ca> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAAgkgEAAA5LAuAAPWKu0A== References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> From: "Stach, Thomas" To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2009 14:59:52.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9C86A30:01CA00A5] X-purgate: clean X-purgate: This mail is considered clean X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Checked for Spam by eleven - eXpurgate www.eXpurgate.net X-purgate-ID: 149917::090709170005-1EC41BA0-19C9DEA4/0-0/0-15 X-purgate-size: 3903/999999 Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:59:32 -0000 Hi Hadriel and Simo, this proposal resembles almost exactly what was proposed as ice-micro-lite in early 2007. ice-micro-lite was proposed as further reduced ice-lite procedures, i.e. ice-lite without the need to respond to STUN connectivity checks. The main differences in this new draft is that the syntax mimics SDP-cap-neg instead of ICE. The discussion back in 2007 ended with a proposal by Jonathan R. which seemed to satisfy all needs. --> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg05648.html I wonder if such an approach, i.e. ice-lite on both sides, would work for your scenarios as well. Regards Thomas =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org=20 > [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 11:43 AM > To: HKaplan@acmepacket.com; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT >=20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ext Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:HKaplan@acmepacket.com]=20 > >Sent: 08 July, 2009 06:01 > >To: Veikkolainen Simo (Nokia-D/Helsinki); mmusic@ietf.org > >Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com > >Subject: RE: A replacement for ANAT > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com=20 > >[mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 7:23 AM > >>=20 > >> Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken=20 > >a look at=20 > >>=20 > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-0 > 0, which=20 > >> also defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we are=20 > >> planning to submit an updated version soon (with minimal changes). > > > >Heh, that's funny - nope hadn't seen that draft before. =20 > > > >The concepts are obviously similar, though different in the=20 > >following ways: > >1) The boucadair draft does not to tie the ccap concept to=20 > >sdp-cap-neg in any way. Specifically, we did not want to make=20 > >implementers have to support sdp-cap-neg just to offer=20 > >alternate addresses for v4/v6. Sdp-cap-neg is a fairly=20 > >complex mechanism for people who don't need it. > > > >2) We assumed in the boucadair draft that a host could not=20 > >necessarily use the same UDP/TCP/etc. port numbers for the=20 > >alternate address, since they're different number spaces, so=20 > >we include the port number in the ccap attribute. > > > >3) Since we include the port number in the ccap in the=20 > >boucadair draft, and the port number is specific to the media=20 > >line, we do not allow the ccap at the session level - only the=20 > >media level. > > > >4) The boucadair draft is for the alternate address/port=20 > >connection concept only, and not for any other capabilities. =20 > >This was done on purpose, because the only goal was to have a=20 > >workable replacement model for ANAT for v4/v6, so we wanted=20 > >any claims of compliance to the draft to be for the specific=20 > >support of ccap. >=20 > The ccap attribute as defined in the boucadair draft seems to=20 > borrow its syntax from sdp cap-neg, but is otherwise totally=20 > independent; but I guess this was your intention. Actually,=20 > you probably could remove any references to sdp-cap-neg=20 > without losing any of the functionality you have described.=20 >=20 > You could use the definitions in=20 > draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap for the address capability=20 > part, but you would still need the port number indicated as a=20 > capability. This is not defined currently in any of the=20 > related drafts (sdp-cap-neg, sdp-media-capabilities, sdp-misc-cap).=20 >=20 > Simo >=20 > >-hadriel > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >=20 From HKaplan@acmepacket.com Thu Jul 9 09:45:54 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016183A6D00 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:45:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YpGm1gW27a8x for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93543A6B57 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:46:18 -0400 Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:46:18 -0400 From: Hadriel Kaplan To: "Stach, Thomas" , "Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com" , "mmusic@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:46:17 -0400 Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAAgkgEAAA5LAuAAPWKu0AACu9zw Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <65A25F4A9EA17343A44B0456FBE6217DB135BA@nets11ca> In-Reply-To: <65A25F4A9EA17343A44B0456FBE6217DB135BA@nets11ca> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:45:54 -0000 Hi Thomas,=20 I don't remember a micro-lite, but we did consider an ICE-Lite model instea= d of a new attribute. The problem is, and correct me if I'm wrong, but in = the current ICE draft-19 an ICE-lite implementation MUST be able to respond= to connectivity checks. That was a basic requirement from that email you = cited as well. The basic rationale for that is to enable NAT traversal. But we have no such need in the boucadair-draft, or for ANAT replacement in= general. All we need is for an alternate address to be signaled in a back= wards-compatible fashion in the offer, and one of them to be picked/used in= the answer. In particular, I fully expect there to be ccap-offering devic= es which cannot respond to connectivity checks. So re-using the ice-lite c= oncept is inappropriate I think. It isn't ICE really. For example, suppose a device which could not respond to connectivity check= s sent an ice-lite offer, and the answerer was capable of ICE-full. The an= swerer would do connectivity checks, and they would fail. =20 So instead, the proposal in the boucadair-draft is to signal this using a c= cap attribute, which is an alternative to ICE. The offerer can offer both = ccap and ICE (or even Ice-Lite); an Ice-only answerer would ignore the ccap= ; a ccap-only device would ignore the ICE attributes and do ccap; and an an= swerer which can do both can choose whether to use ICE or ccap, but it can'= t use both. There are some other differences as well, but not as big probably. -hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: Stach, Thomas [mailto:thomas.stach@siemens-enterprise.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:00 AM >=20 > Hi Hadriel and Simo, >=20 > this proposal resembles almost exactly what was proposed as > ice-micro-lite in early 2007. > ice-micro-lite was proposed as further reduced ice-lite procedures, i.e. > ice-lite without the need to respond to STUN connectivity checks. > The main differences in this new draft is that the syntax mimics > SDP-cap-neg instead of ICE. >=20 > The discussion back in 2007 ended with a proposal by Jonathan R. which > seemed to satisfy all needs. > --> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg05648.html >=20 > I wonder if such an approach, i.e. ice-lite on both sides, would work > for your scenarios as well. >=20 From Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com Fri Jul 10 05:21:28 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631B328C2AF for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:21:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, MIME error: error: illegal encoding [base64] for MIME type message/external-body X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6UOmofPsTDv for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D6228C15B for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id n6ACKepR027616 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:20:47 +0300 Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:18:55 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:18:50 +0300 Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.7]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:18:50 +0200 From: To: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:18:48 +0200 Thread-Topic: I-D Action:draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.txt Thread-Index: AcoAJCn2IhJpcsfOTSO2NwzZjeT0wwBM/5/g Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_003_B23B311878A0B4438F5F09F47E01AAE03A72D50386NOKEUMSG01mgd_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2009 12:18:50.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[95385FD0:01CA0158] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [MMUSIC] FW: I-D Action:draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:21:28 -0000 --_003_B23B311878A0B4438F5F09F47E01AAE03A72D50386NOKEUMSG01mgd_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have submitted a new version of the misc-cap draft. Changes are only in = the dates to keep the draft alive as we could not recollect any open techni= cal items. In case we have forgotten to address your comments or concerns, = please let us know. Simo=20 >-----Original Message----- >From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org=20 >[mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext=20 >Internet-Drafts@ietf.org >Sent: 09 July, 2009 02:30 >To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >Subject: I-D Action:draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.txt=20 > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line=20 >Internet-Drafts directories. > > Title : Miscellaneous Capabilities=20 >Negotiation in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) > Author(s) : M. Garcia, et al. > Filename : draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.txt > Pages : 15 > Date : 2009-07-08 > >SDP has been extended with a capability negotiation mechanism=20 >framework that allows the endpoints to negotiate transport=20 >protocols and attributes. This framework has been extended=20 >with a Media capabilities negotiation mechanism that allows=20 >endpoints to negotiate additional media-related capabilities. =20 >This negotiation is embedded into the widely-used SDP=20 >offer/answer procedures. > >This memo extends the SDP capability negotiation framework to=20 >allow endpoints to negotiate a number of miscellaneous SDP=20 >capabilities. >In particular, this memo provides a mechanism to negotiate=20 >media titles ("i=3D" line for each media), connection data ("c=3D"=20 >line), and media bandwidth ("b=3D" line). > >A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-mis >c-cap-01.txt > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail=20 >reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII=20 >version of the Internet-Draft. >= --_003_B23B311878A0B4438F5F09F47E01AAE03A72D50386NOKEUMSG01mgd_ Content-Type: message/external-body; name="draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.url" Content-Description: draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.url Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01.url"; size=100; creation-date="Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:31:05 GMT"; modification-date="Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:31:05 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 W0ludGVybmV0U2hvcnRjdXRdDQpVUkw9ZnRwOi8vZnRwLmlldGYub3JnL2ludGVybmV0LWRyYWZ0 cy9kcmFmdC1nYXJjaWEtbW11c2ljLXNkcC1taXNjLWNhcC0wMS50eHQNCg== --_003_B23B311878A0B4438F5F09F47E01AAE03A72D50386NOKEUMSG01mgd_ Content-Type: text/plain; name="ATT00001.txt" Content-Description: ATT00001.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ATT00001.txt"; size=258; creation-date="Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:31:05 GMT"; modification-date="Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:31:05 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkktRC1Bbm5v dW5jZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCkktRC1Bbm5vdW5jZUBpZXRmLm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9pLWQtYW5ub3VuY2UNCkludGVybmV0LURyYWZ0IGRpcmVj dG9yaWVzOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL3NoYWRvdy5odG1sDQpvciBmdHA6Ly9mdHAuaWV0 Zi5vcmcvaWV0Zi8xc2hhZG93LXNpdGVzLnR4dA0K --_003_B23B311878A0B4438F5F09F47E01AAE03A72D50386NOKEUMSG01mgd_-- From root@core3.amsl.com Fri Jul 10 10:00:01 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 2603728C0FF; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:00:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090710170001.2603728C0FF@core3.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-capabilities-08.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:00:01 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. Title : SDP media capabilities Negotiation Author(s) : R. Gilman, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-capabilities-08.txt Pages : 47 Date : 2009-07-10 Session Description Protocol (SDP) capability negotiation provides a general framework for indicating and negotiating capabilities in SDP. The base framework defines only capabilities for negotiating transport protocols and attributes. In this document, we extend the framework by defining media capabilities that can be used to negotiate media types and their associated parameters. This extension is designed to map easily to existing and future SDP media attributes, but not encodings or formatting. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-capabilities-08.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-capabilities-08.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2009-07-10095627.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From root@core3.amsl.com Mon Jul 13 03:00:04 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 919213A6C01; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:00:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090713100004.919213A6C01@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc3388bis-03.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:00:04 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. Title : The SDP (Session Description Protocol) Grouping Framework Author(s) : G. Camarillo Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc3388bis-03.txt Pages : 20 Date : 2009-07-13 In this specification, we define a framework to group "m" lines in SDP (Session Description Protocol) for different purposes. This framework uses the "group" and "mid" SDP attributes, both of which are defined in this specification. Additionally, we specify how to use the framework for two different purposes: for lip synchronization and for receiving a media flow consisting of several media streams on different transport addresses. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc3388bis-03.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc3388bis-03.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2009-07-13025742.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From root@core3.amsl.com Mon Jul 13 07:00:01 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 6883E3A6D7E; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:00:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090713140001.6883E3A6D7E@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-08.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:00:01 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. Title : A Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal mechanism for media controlled by Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) Author(s) : J. Goldberg, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-08.txt Pages : 28 Date : 2009-07-13 This document defines a solution for Network Address Translation (NAT) traversal for datagram based media streams setup and controlled with Real-time Streaming Protocol version 2 (RTSP 2.0). It uses Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) adapted to use RTSP as a signalling channel, defining the necessary extra RTSP extensions and procedures. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-08.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-08.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2009-07-13064742.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Mon Jul 13 08:57:25 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D1B3A6DB2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:57:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2US5wR3SK22G for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCC028C479 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7be7ae000001a87-64-4a5b59806000 Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 28.34.06791.0895B5A4; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:57:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.172]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:57:51 +0200 Received: from [153.88.50.16] ([153.88.50.16]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:57:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4A5B597E.2080700@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:57:50 +0200 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaehwan Kim References: <20090619133001.9387C3A69C5@core3.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jul 2009 15:57:51.0545 (UTC) FILETIME=[AD16D290:01CA03D2] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:57:25 -0000 Hi, Thanks for your comments. See inline for each individual item. The changes made will be able in the 22 version. Jaehwan Kim skrev: > Hi, > > It seems that the biggest change is 'DVD Player remote control' because > I always introduced people RTSP as a TV remote control protocol. > > And I would like to share some my comments, originally written for my > better understanding, if you don't mind. > >> (Page18) When the server is notifying the client about the end of the > media delivery requested using PLAY, it sends a PLAY_NOTIFY request to > the client. > [jh]The right intention looks "When the server wants to notify the > client about the end of the media delivery, it can send a > PLAY_NOTIFY..." Yes, I changed this to: When the server want to notify the client about the completion of the media delivery, it sends a PLAY_NOTIFY request to the client. > >> (Page18) The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes information about the last > RTP sequence numbers for each stream, and thus enables correct handling > of the buffer drainage at the end. > [jh] How about this? "The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes the last RTP > sequence number for each stream to help the player to empty the buffer > smoothly." Yes, reworded it somewhat: The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes information about the stream end, including the last RTP sequence number for each stream, thus enabling the client to empty the buffer smoothly. > >> (Page19) For video is possible to manipulate the number of frames that > is displayed per second, but... > [jh] This part could be enhanced like below. Correct me if I am wrong. > Some 'this' are ambiguous to me. > > "For video, it is possible to manipulate the framerate on the fly, > although the randering capabilities are often limited to certain frame > rates. And the allowed contents bitrate also limits the modification of > the framerate. Therefore, basically fast forward feature could be > implemented in this regards in which some subset of the frames from the > original content could be picked up. However, the result of this way > would be different from the video encoding methods. > > Due to the media characteristics, possible scale ratios is commonly > limited. To signal right scale ratio information, RTSP has a way of > indicating the supported Scale ratios for the content. To support > aggregated or dynamic content, where the scale may change during the > session and this change is dependent on the location within the content, > a mechanism for updating the media properties and the currently used > scale factor exists." > I want to keep this reasonably non-specific when it comes to the codec. Is this better? For video is possible to manipulate the frame rate, although the rendering capabilities are often limited to certain frame rates. Also the allowed bit-rates in decoding, the structured used in the encoding and its dependency between frames and other capabilities of the rendering device limits the possible manipulations. Due to the media restrictions, the possible scale values are commonly restricted to a limited set of possible scale ratios. To enable the clients to select from the possible scale values, RTSP can signal the supported Scale ratios for the content. To support aggregated or dynamic content, where this may change during the ongoing session and dependent on the location within the content, a mechanism for updating the media properties and the current used scale factor exist. >> (Page20) Speed affects how much of > [jh] I think this parts overally should be re-reviewed. Or I would > revisit here again later. > Well, it is a lot of new text. When it comes to this I do need feedback what is problematic with the text. Writing about speed and scale is problematic. >> (Page25) > transport. A message is either a Request or a Response. > > Message Body: The information transferred as the payload of a > message. A message body consists of meta-information in the > (snip) > [jh] the expression, "either a request or a response" should be in the > message body. It helps RTSP implementers to consider message body even > in the request which is not common in basic operation. Therefore, rather > the original sentence in draft20 looks better. And I think "The > information transferred as the payload of a request or response." could > be rephrased to "The contents of the message without the message header > in either RTSP request or response message." I have clarified that this is either a request or a response. But your suggested phrasing is a the invert that isn't fully true as there can be other parts in a message. I try to write what it is. > >> (Page141) The server SHALL > respond if the session is in playing state with the Range header > filled in with the current playback point and with the corresponding > RTP-Info values. > [jh] Original one looks more clear. It would be enhanced like below, > though. > "The server SHALL respond if the session is in playing state. Then, that > response MUST have RTP-Info value which is corresponding to the given > Range value." Okay, is this clearer? The RTP-Info header and the Range header MAY be included in a GET_PARAMETER request from client to server without any values to request the current playback point and corresponding.RTP synchronization information. When the RTP-Info header is included in a Request also the Range header MUST be included (Note, Range header only MAY be used). The server respons SHALL include both the Range header and the RTP-Info header. If the session is in playing state, then the value of the Range header SHALL be filled in with the current playback point and with the corresponding RTP-Info values. If the server is another state, no values are included in the RTP-Info header. > >> (Page250) > S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0 > CSeq: 45 > Notify-Reason: end-of-stream > Request-Status: cseq=4 status=200 reason="OK" > Range: npt=-15 > RTP-Info:url="rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack" > ssrc=0D12F123:seq=49;rtptime=39200 > Session: abcdefgh > > C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK > CSeq: 854 > User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2 > [jh] CSeq looks mismatched. > Fixed. Thanks for the comments Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From root@core3.amsl.com Mon Jul 13 09:45:02 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 1FF803A6E6D; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:45:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:45:02 -0000 --NextPart A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group of the IETF. Title : Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP) Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt Pages : 282 Date : 2009-07-13 This memorandum defines RTSP version 2.0 which obsoletes RTSP version 1.0 which is defined in RFC 2326. The Real Time Streaming Protocol, or RTSP, is an application-level protocol for setup and control of the delivery of data with real-time properties. RTSP provides an extensible framework to enable controlled, on-demand delivery of real-time data, such as audio and video. Sources of data can include both live data feeds and stored clips. This protocol is intended to control multiple data delivery sessions, provide a means for choosing delivery channels such as UDP, multicast UDP and TCP, and provide a means for choosing delivery mechanisms based upon RTP (RFC 3550). A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2009-07-13093826.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From jaehwan@vidiator.com Mon Jul 13 19:08:08 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91413A6CA2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mYiyZh+swUw9 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kor1corpmail01.mediator.com (vkimail.vidiator.com [211.189.53.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2260D3A67A8 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:08:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:08:30 +0900 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4A5B597E.2080700@ericsson.com> References: <20090619133001.9387C3A69C5@core3.amsl.com> <4A5B597E.2080700@ericsson.com> From: "Jaehwan Kim" To: "Magnus Westerlund" Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:08:08 -0000 Hi Magnus, Thanks for your prompt response. It looks good. Regards, Jaehwan -----Original Message----- From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 12:58 AM To: Jaehwan Kim Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-21.txt Hi, Thanks for your comments. See inline for each individual item. The changes made will be able in the 22 version. Jaehwan Kim skrev: > Hi, >=20 > It seems that the biggest change is 'DVD Player remote control' = because > I always introduced people RTSP as a TV remote control protocol. >=20 > And I would like to share some my comments, originally written for my > better understanding, if you don't mind. >=20 >> (Page18) When the server is notifying the client about the end of the > media delivery requested using PLAY, it sends a PLAY_NOTIFY request to > the client.=20 > [jh]The right intention looks "When the server wants to notify the > client about the end of the media delivery, it can send a > PLAY_NOTIFY..." Yes, I changed this to: When the server want to notify the client about the completion of the media delivery, it sends a PLAY_NOTIFY request to the client. >=20 >> (Page18) The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes information about the last > RTP sequence numbers for each stream, and thus enables correct = handling > of the buffer drainage at the end. > [jh] How about this? "The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes the last RTP > sequence number for each stream to help the player to empty the buffer > smoothly." Yes, reworded it somewhat: The PLAY_NOTIFY request includes information about the stream end, including the last RTP sequence number for each stream, thus enabling the client to empty the buffer smoothly. >=20 >> (Page19) For video is possible to manipulate the number of frames = that > is displayed per second, but... > [jh] This part could be enhanced like below. Correct me if I am wrong. > Some 'this' are ambiguous to me. >=20 > "For video, it is possible to manipulate the framerate on the fly, > although the randering capabilities are often limited to certain frame > rates. And the allowed contents bitrate also limits the modification = of > the framerate. Therefore, basically fast forward feature could be > implemented in this regards in which some subset of the frames from = the > original content could be picked up. However, the result of this way > would be different from the video encoding methods. >=20 > Due to the media characteristics, possible scale ratios is commonly > limited. To signal right scale ratio information, RTSP has a way of > indicating the supported Scale ratios for the content. To support > aggregated or dynamic content, where the scale may change during the > session and this change is dependent on the location within the = content, > a mechanism for updating the media properties and the currently used > scale factor exists." >=20 I want to keep this reasonably non-specific when it comes to the codec. Is this better? For video is possible to manipulate the frame rate, although the rendering capabilities are often limited to certain frame rates. Also the allowed bit-rates in decoding, the structured used in the encoding and its dependency between frames and other capabilities of the rendering device limits the possible manipulations. Due to the media restrictions, the possible scale values are commonly restricted to a limited set of possible scale ratios. To enable the clients to select from the possible scale values, RTSP can signal the supported Scale ratios for the content. To support aggregated or dynamic content, where this may change during the ongoing session and dependent on the location within the content, a mechanism for updating the media properties and the current used scale factor exist. >> (Page20) Speed affects how much of=20 > [jh] I think this parts overally should be re-reviewed. Or I would > revisit here again later. >=20 Well, it is a lot of new text. When it comes to this I do need feedback what is problematic with the text. Writing about speed and scale is problematic. >> (Page25) > transport. A message is either a Request or a Response. >=20 > Message Body: The information transferred as the payload of a > message. A message body consists of meta-information in the > (snip) > [jh] the expression, "either a request or a response" should be in the > message body. It helps RTSP implementers to consider message body even > in the request which is not common in basic operation. Therefore, = rather > the original sentence in draft20 looks better. And I think "The > information transferred as the payload of a request or response." = could > be rephrased to "The contents of the message without the message = header > in either RTSP request or response message." I have clarified that this is either a request or a response. But your suggested phrasing is a the invert that isn't fully true as there can be other parts in a message. I try to write what it is. >=20 >> (Page141) The server SHALL > respond if the session is in playing state with the Range header > filled in with the current playback point and with the = corresponding > RTP-Info values. > [jh] Original one looks more clear. It would be enhanced like below, > though. > "The server SHALL respond if the session is in playing state. Then, = that > response MUST have RTP-Info value which is corresponding to the given > Range value." Okay, is this clearer? The RTP-Info header and the Range header MAY be included in a GET_PARAMETER request from client to server without any values to request the current playback point and corresponding.RTP synchronization information. When the RTP-Info header is included in a Request also the Range header MUST be included (Note, Range header only MAY be used). The server respons SHALL include both the Range header and the RTP-Info header. If the session is in playing state, then the value of the Range header SHALL be filled in with the current playback point and with the corresponding RTP-Info values. If the server is another state, no values are included in the RTP-Info header. >=20 >> (Page250)=20 > S->C: PLAY_NOTIFY rtsp://example.com/fizzle RTSP/2.0 > CSeq: 45 > Notify-Reason: end-of-stream > Request-Status: cseq=3D4 status=3D200 reason=3D"OK" > Range: npt=3D-15 > RTP-Info:url=3D"rtsp://example.com/fizzle/audiotrack" > ssrc=3D0D12F123:seq=3D49;rtptime=3D39200 > Session: abcdefgh >=20 > C->S: RTSP/2.0 200 OK > CSeq: 854 > User-Agent: PhonyClient/1.2 > [jh] CSeq looks mismatched.=20 >=20 Fixed. Thanks for the comments Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 F=E4r=F6gatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com Tue Jul 14 02:39:14 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF2D3A6C19 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:39:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.824 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.824 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.575, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8M19MX4edPPB for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBA03A6E7B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:39:00 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7b2fae000000abb-89-4a5c37187c40 Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 35.DD.02747.8173C5A4; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:43:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.172]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:33:16 +0200 Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:33:14 +0200 Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3D12991; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:32:48 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E935421A07; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:32:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921F521925; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:32:47 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4A5C349F.2060009@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:32:47 +0300 From: Salvatore Loreto User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Salvatore Loreto References: <487C6462.6010504@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <487C6462.6010504@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2009 07:33:14.0149 (UTC) FILETIME=[58C49550:01CA0455] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo Subject: [MMUSIC] new draft mmusic-sctp-sdp-04 X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:39:14 -0000 Hi, I have submitted a new version of the draft-loreto-mmusic-sctp-sdp, to address the comment received both in maling list and during the presentation in SF. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-loreto-mmusic-sctp-sdp-04.txt The new ID does not make use of TLS/SCTP as described in RFC3436 any more, ( since we have been told no one has implemented this yet and more important it does not support PR-SCTP). Instead it defines DTLS/SCTP as described in I-D.ietf-tsvwg-dtls-for-sctp. cheers Sal From jf.mule@cablelabs.com Wed Jul 15 14:46:33 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881993A6C26 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:46:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.277 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4kknEXJHC+H for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753013A68D2 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6FLiT5t012464; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:44:29 -0600 Received: from srvxchg3.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.25) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:44:29 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:44:19 -0600 Message-ID: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C60226B09B@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: draft agenda for MMUSIC WG meeting at IETF 75 Thread-Index: AcoFlWiuw8yqK9FwSUGikSf8SoI6Pg== From: "Jean-Francois Mule" To: X-Approved: ondar Cc: Joerg Ott Subject: [MMUSIC] draft agenda for MMUSIC WG meeting at IETF 75 X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:46:33 -0000 Hi, I just posted a draft agenda for the MMUSIC WG meeting at IETF#75 at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09jul/agenda/mmusic.html=20 A txt version is provided below. Let Joerg and I know how this looks and if we missed your request. For those of you who had special requests due to conflicts with other WG sessions, double-check. Thanks, Joerg and Jean-Francois. --- = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- Multiparty Multimedia Session Control (MMUSIC) Working Group --- DRAFT Agenda for IETF#75 MMUSIC WG Meeting --- Last Updated: July 15, 2009 --- = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D THURSDAY, July 30, 2009, 0900-1130 Morning Session I Room: Congresshall C CHAIRS: Joerg Ott Jean-Francois Mule AGENDA Introduction and progress report (Chairs, 10) 1) RTSP-related Drafts RTSP 2.0 (Magnus Westerlund, 15) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22 RTSP NAT (Magnus Westerlund, 5) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rtsp-nat-08 Fast Content Switching with RTSP 2.0 (Thorsten Lohmar, 15) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-einarsson-mmusic-rtsp-macuri-02 SIP/SDP Overlap with RTSP (Jan Lindquist, 15) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lindquist-mmusic-sip-rtsp-00 2) SDP Attributes SDP Connectivity Capability (CCAP) (H. Kaplan, M. Boucadair, 15) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00 =20 SDP Attribute for Maximum Media Sources (Jonathan Lennox, 10) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lennox-mmusic-sdp-max-sources-00 Media Source Selection in SDP (Jonathan Lennox, 20) =20 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lennox-mmusic-sdp-source-selection-00 SDP Extensions for audio over PSTN CS bearers=20 (Simo Veikkolainen, 10) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-01 Misc Capability Negotiation in SDP (Simo Veikkolainen, 10) http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01 From ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com Fri Jul 17 01:54:16 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B7C3A6BFB for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.702 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.053, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSF8meQEh-fP for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5631128C298 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:54:10 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7c01ae00000498b-74-4a603c523178 Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 95.DB.18827.25C306A4; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:54:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.2]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:54:42 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:54:41 +0200 Message-ID: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C6E40E1@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes Thread-Index: AcoGvDk6DVYQ8BjyQpOxP+d0BNAeFQ== From: "Ingemar Johansson S" To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2009 08:54:42.0331 (UTC) FILETIME=[399736B0:01CA06BC] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:54:16 -0000 Hi =20 The message below was posted already on may 26 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07623.html =20 Please let me know what is needed to make this draft advance to WGLC =20 /Ingemar =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D In=20 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07613.html Kyunghun Jung gave a response regarding 3GPP SA4s view on the draft. In=20 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07614.html I beleieve I have clarified the issues that was raised during the AVT session and the discussion with Roni Even and Jonathan Lennox afterwards. With this in mind I would like to know what is missing in order to make this draft advance to WGLC. Regards Ingemar=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From jf.mule@cablelabs.com Mon Jul 20 08:47:52 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF24C3A6D83 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:47:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.137 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XF3lgoaVHHmJ for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA77E3A6D85 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id n6KFlhMo016553; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:47:43 -0600 Received: from srvxchg3.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.25) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:47:43 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:46:38 -0600 Message-ID: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C60226B285@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C6E40E1@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Update requested on draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was: RE: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes ) Thread-Index: AcoGvDk6DVYQ8BjyQpOxP+d0BNAeFQCk0MkQ References: <130EBB38279E9847BAAAE0B8F9905F8C6E40E1@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se> From: "Jean-Francois Mule" To: "Ingemar Johansson S" , X-Approved: ondar Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, jo@acm.org Subject: [MMUSIC] Update requested on draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes (was: RE: Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes ) X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:47:52 -0000 Ingemar, You have requested that=20 draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes-02 goes through WGLC. After my review of the draft, I believe it needs some more editing before we can proceed for a final wg review. The note below provides some editorial and technical comments. Thanks, Jean-Francois. MMUSIC co-chair --- Notes This is a brief review of draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes-02, dated April 16, 2009. 1) ID nits See http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=3Dhttp://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mm= u sic-image-attributes-02.txt=20 Please fix the ID nits. 2) Editorial comments The draft needs some rewrite in various sections to present the requirements and motivations more clearly to the reader. 2.1) In some instances, it is a case of just cleaning up some English syntax: - spell out e.g. into 'example' in sentence like: | "A possible use case is to make it possible for a e.g a low-end | hand-held terminal to display video without" same for | As most codecs specifies some kind of indication of e.g. the | image size already=20 | This may not work well e.g in the presence of bad channel | conditions esp. in=20 or even for: | " Optimal aspect ratio: If rescaling of the image is possible on the | receiver side one can imagine that the offer contains three | resolutions 100x200, 200x100 and 100x100 with sar=3D1.0 (1:1). -> here state the benefit clearly, then follow with an example. Consider something like this: Optimal aspect ratio: the indication of the supported image sizes and aspect ratio allows the receiver to select the most appropriate combination based on its rescaling capabilities and the desired rendering. For example, if a sender proposes three resolutions in its SDP Offer, 100x200, 200x100 and 100x100 with sar=3D1.0 (1:1), etc. 2.2) In other cases, it is a matter of rewriting the text as it would read in the RFC. Forget the debates in the WG that led to inserting some text here and there to justify requirements or choices, just present the story with the consensus for a new reader. Example p3: " The cautious reader may however object that the rescaling issue has been moved to the sender and also that codecs such as H.264 are not mandated to support the rescaling of the video image size. This potentially reduces the number of valid arguments to only 1 (optimal use of bandwidth)." -> rather than objecting, when this document is an RFC, the implementer will simply disregard this or will not consider it valuable enough for implementation. Consider replacing the text above with something like this " In cases where rescaling is not implemented (for example, rescaling is not mandatory to implement in H.264), the indication of the image attributes may still provide an optimal use of bandwidth because ...." ^^^^ explain=20 Another example is the list that follows (end of page 3, start of page 4): | However, what must then be considered is that: | | o Rescaling on the sender/encoder side is likely to be easier to do | as the camera related software/hardware already contains the | necessary functionality for zooming/cropping/trimming/sharpening | the video signal. Moreover, rescaling is generally done in RGB or | YUV domain and should not depend on the codecs used. ... and the 2 bullets that follow This seems again a leftover of an argument that rescaling is better done on the sender side. At this point, I would recommend you capture this more clearly: For implementers that are considering rescaling issues, note that there are several benefits to doing it on the sender side. 2.3) Other nits: p4: s/more specific peer to peer situations/more specifically, point-to-point communications p4: do a spell check, see the heading of section 3 s/Defintion/Definition p4++: from section 3 onward, the text would gain in clarity if you remove the already mentioned examples and use a specification style. Example, proposed new text for the introduction of section 3: This section defines the SDP image attribute "imageattr" that can be used in an SDP Offer/Answer exchange to indicate various image attribute parameters. In this document, we define the following image attribute parameters: image resolution, sample aspect ratio (sar), allowed range in picture aspect ratio and the preference of a given parameter set over another. The attribute is however extensible and guidelines for defining extensions are provided in <>. -> no need to call out some of the benefits again here =20 Remove "new" in places like "new image attribute" or "new attribute" (by the time this is an RFC, it is not new anymore). 2.4) Might help to have a separate section covering some of the=20 objectives you state in the intro and the requirements of section 3.1 (i.e., put all of that in a section outside the introduction where you consolidate the motivations, benefits and requirements.=20 Not a must though, just a suggestion. 3) Technical comments - terminology: you use "sender" and "receiver" for the endpoints that send or receive the media. You use "offerer" and "answerer" to designate the roles of the endpoint in the O/A model. Sometimes, you mix and match those, please review all those 4 terms and make sure they are used with their meaning. May be you could reuse what is in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5547 (where file sender/receiver are close to what you call sender/receiver of media). Example: p4, section 3: | The new SDP attribute contains a set of image attribute options | that the offerer can provide. The receiver can then select the =20 I think you mean the answerer here. The offerer is sometimes the sender, sometimes the receiver, let's not mix the roles. =20 =20 - normative reference: In section 3, you define the attribute by essentially requiring the SDP Offer/Answer mechanism to be used. =3D> I believe RFC 4566 and 3264 must be normative=20 - reference to 3GPP discussion paper: p4 has a pointer to [S4-080144]. I read this document and it do not find it useful to leave in the RFC-to-be. Either some of the motivations have already been laid out in the draft, or else they should be. The issue I have with leaving this pointer is that it concludes with a recommendation to extending "a=3Dframesize" while this whole draft is about providing a different solution. For what you think is still important in that 3GPP document, put it in plain English in the document and get rid of the pointer. Is there a 3GPP document that makes use of this attribute? If so, can you provide a pointer to the list? - section 3.1 and use of RFC 2119 verbs: I would say that based on the document, you want to=20 replace this: "The new image attribute should meet the following requirements:" with: "The image attribute MUST meet the following requirements:" BTW please check, you have 2 requirements numbered REQ-3 and then if you think OPT-1 is optional, make this a MAY or a SHOULD. - section 3.1 and requirements: Here are some comments on the current requirements: | The new image attribute should meet the following requirements: ^^^ ^^^^^ remove MUST | | REQ-1: Support the offer of a specific image size on the receiver | display or in other words, reduce or avoid the need for rescaling | images in the receiver to fit a given portion of the screen. I would change this REQ-1 into: Support the indication of one or more set(s) of image attributes that the SDP endpoint wish to receive or send. An image attribute set MUST include a specific image size. (I would cut the rest "reduce or avoid... as this is best in the motivation section and, the avoidance of rescaling is separate from this requirement.) | |REQ-2: Support asymmetric setups i.e the very likely scenario where | Alice prefers an image size of 320x240 for her display while Bob | prefers an image size of 176x144. s/setup/negotiation of image attributes, meaning that each side in the Offer/Answer SHOULD be able to negotiate the image attributes if prefers to send and receive. | |REQ-3: Interoperate with codec specific parameters such as sprop- | parameter-sets in H.264 or config in MPEG4. this needs to be developed and more specific. Expand and provide examples or justifications here as well. | |REQ-3: Make the attribute generic with as little codec specific | details/tricks as possible. Ideally the attribute should not care | about the codec specific features. replace with s/Make the attribute generic with as little codec specific details/tricks as possible/be codec agnostic | |OPT-1: Make it possible to use attribute for other purposes than | video. One possible use case may be distributed white-board | presentations which are based on transmission of compressed bitmap | images where rescaling often produce very poor results. replace with As written, I'm not sure if this is a requirement. May be you mean: the image attribute SHOULD support the description of image-related attributes for various types of media, including video, pictures, images, etc. - page 5: your aBNF is not valid. =20 a) A rulename cannot have underscores, please update. b) for comments use ';' followed by the comment c) check it http://tools.ietf.org/tools/bap/abnf.cgi this probably works: image-attr =3D "imageattr:" PT 1*2( 1*WSP ( "send" / "recv" ) 1*WSP attr-list ) PT =3D 1*DIGIT / "*" attr-list =3D ( set *(1*WSP set) ) / "*" d) define the whole aBNF in one place: include the set rulename with everything else, define range in aBNF e) any extension token for the attribute set? f) put a reference for aBNF - aBNF, payload type and requirement to support images: p6 says: |o PT is the payload type number, it can be set to * to indicate that | the attribute applies to all payload types in the media | description. do all media have a payload type? what do you do for things that have MIME type image/jpeg? just put *? what if I want to use this attribute with RFC 5547? - section 3.2.1 and image attribute per payload type or for all: could there be use cases where you would want to specify an image attribute per group of media? for example, an offer contains a bunch of video codecs, two audio codecs and the offerer would like to indicate an image attribute preference for all video codecs. This is the case of an endpoint that says: no matter what PT you choose to send, I'd like to receive it with this set of image attributes. Putting * does not work because of the audio. Is there a case where media line grouping could work and the semantic of the PT can be a payload type, a group of media lines? PT =3D 1*DIGIT / "*" / "mid:" 1*DIGIT see RFC3388bis and mid - section 3.2.1 The section below is critical for the O/A negotiation and it is not clear in the current draft. | o The answerer MAY choose to keep imageattr but is not required to | do so. If the attribute is kept in the SDP answer: It seems to me that SDP implementations that support this RFC-to-be MUST include the imageattr in the response if it is included in the Offer. In other words, the whole purpose of this attribute is to negotiate and if one side expresses a preference, the other one must respond with something, no? | * The answerer MUST for its receive direction only include one or | more valid entries taken from the offer. In other words, the | answerer MUST for its receive direction only pick one or more | valid entries from the multidimensional solution space spanned | by the offer. s/from the offer/from the Offer's send direction. s/valid entries/entries it can support=20 (or you should define clearly what a valid entry is, it means a set of image attributes it can support) s/ multidimensional solution space spanned by the offer/ sub-set of entries proposed by in the Offer in the Offerer's send direction. =3D=3D> what happens if the answerer cannot support any of the offered image values? you seem to allow Bob to respond to Alice with what he can support in section 3.2.2. page 9, something that would contradict the MUST above. =20 See "If Bob does not support any x and y resolution in the given x and y range in attr_list or a * was given for the recv direction then he MUST either: o Provide with another list of options (attr_list). The answer from Bob may then look like:" =20 | * The answerer MAY for its send direction modify the attribute in | the sense that new entries other than those presented in the | offer are added. It must however be noted that this may lead | to an extra offer/answer exchange of the added parameters are | not supported by the offerer. =20 "added"? that means the answerer cannot remove things from the offerered list? this is confusing, especially given that in the Offer, what the offerer puts in its rec parameter list is only a preference. - section 3.2.2 Some of the semantic defined in 3.2.2. MUST have associated requirements in section 3.1.1., given the way you've chosen to split those up. =20 - IANA section fill in the contact details again add the long form name of the attribute add appropriate values with a pointer to section 3.1 (see draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-10 for an example) // stopped my review here given the time allocated to this ID. > -----Original Message----- > From: Ingemar Johansson S [mailto:ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com] > Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:55 AM > To: Jean-Francois Mule; jo@acm.org; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Moving draft-ietf-mmusic-image-attributes >=20 > Hi >=20 > The message below was posted already on may 26 > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07623.html >=20 > Please let me know what is needed to make this draft advance to > WGLC >=20 > /Ingemar > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D > In > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07613.html > Kyunghun Jung gave a response regarding 3GPP SA4s view on the > draft. > In > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg07614.html > I beleieve I have clarified the issues that was raised during the > AVT > session and the discussion with Roni Even and Jonathan Lennox > afterwards. > With this in mind I would like to know what is missing in order to > make > this draft advance to WGLC. > Regards > Ingemar > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D From jf.mule@cablelabs.com Wed Jul 22 08:56:37 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391343A6B6B for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:56:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.067 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.067 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.396, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AP4Yt2BhMdG2 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E833A68F6 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id n6MFnX2n014641; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:49:33 -0600 Received: from srvxchg3.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.25) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:49:33 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 09:49:30 -0600 Message-ID: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C60226B38C@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Request for MMUSIC review of SDP usage in MEDIACTRL Control Framework Thread-Index: AcoK5AA1DRhGeVYHR/OLXYhbcPmotg== From: "Jean-Francois Mule" To: X-Approved: ondar Cc: draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework@tools.ietf.org, Eric Burger , Spencer Dawkins Subject: [MMUSIC] Request for MMUSIC review of SDP usage in MEDIACTRL Control Framework X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:56:37 -0000 The Media Server Control WG has been working on its control framework = document, draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework-10.=20 The MEDIACTRL WG chairs asked if MMUSIC folks could review the SDP = requirements and use of m line in the document. In particular, can one = or two folks go through section 4.1 of the draft and provide feedback? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework-10#= section-4.1 Let us know if you are willing to volunteer and let us know when to = expect some feedback (ideally by the end of the IETF#75 meeting). Copy = the folks in the cc: line of this message. Thank you in advance, Joerg and Jean-Fran=E7ois. MMUSIC co-chairs. From veera.andersson@ericsson.com Thu Jul 23 04:23:09 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958CF3A69D6 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:23:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ao52GCgKU3wj for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6EF3A68FF for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:23:08 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7c01ae00000498b-6e-4a683d363cd6 Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 6F.8A.18827.63D386A4; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.172]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:36:38 +0200 Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:36:38 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1972E2461; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:36:38 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4A683D35.6000207@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:36:37 +0300 From: Veera Andersson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jdrosen@cisco.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jul 2009 10:36:38.0521 (UTC) FILETIME=[759A3E90:01CA0B81] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: [MMUSIC] Issue with ICE controlling/controlled tie-breaker X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:06:39 -0000 Hi, I have a question concerning ICE that came up while implementing an ICE prototype. I think it is possible for two agents to end up with different selected pairs if both agents are initially in controlling role. I mean, regardless of having detecting and repairing of role conflicts implemented. This could happen in a situation where it takes a long time for an ICE answer, from the agent with a lower tie-breaker value, to the initial ICE offer to arrive. For the peer (with lower tie-breaker) to realize to change its role, it needs to receive a Binding request (with ICE-CONTROLLING attribute) from the other endpoint. But this might not happen in time, since the agent with the higher tie-breaker value is still waiting for the answer to its initial ICE offer to arrive in order to start Binding requests. Mean while, it is responding to requests it receives. In such a case, the agent with the lower tie-breaker value might already nominate some pair before the other endpoint has started its checks. When the endpoint with higher tie-breaker finally starts checks, it may (and is likely to) end up nominating another pair since it doesn't accept nomination from the lower tie-breaker peer. Is this perhaps a feature of the specification or is there some other mechanism that covers this case? In case there is not, at least adding the controlling/controlled attribute also to the Binding response messages would solve the problem. Regards, Veera From jf.mule@cablelabs.com Thu Jul 23 08:00:38 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28933A68B3 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:00:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.133 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.133 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.330, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dk16sgq62QBU for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ondar.cablelabs.com (ondar.cablelabs.com [192.160.73.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036DB3A6822 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kyzyl.cablelabs.com (kyzyl [10.253.0.7]) by ondar.cablelabs.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id n6NExc9Z015341 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:59:38 -0600 Received: from srvxchg3.cablelabs.com (10.5.0.25) by kyzyl.cablelabs.com (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com); Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:59:38 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/511/kyzyl.cablelabs.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:59:23 -0600 Message-ID: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C60226B43C@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: MMUSIC WG milestones updated Thread-Index: AcoLpipx/85Vir1oQK+lrFlA7PP7UA== From: "Jean-Francois Mule" To: X-Approved: ondar Subject: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG milestones updated X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:00:38 -0000 Check http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/mmusic-charter.html let us know if you have any comments and if we missed any WG item. Joerg and Jean-Francois. From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Fri Jul 24 02:12:47 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641533A6AE8 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.649 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.600, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xu59lkrd35TW for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF083A6908 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7bf5ae000000202-48-4a697b02fbb5 Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 5A.B7.00514.20B796A4; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:28 +0200 Received: from [153.88.48.95] ([153.88.48.95]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4A697AF1.1040000@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:12:17 +0200 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Francois Mule References: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C60226B43C@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> In-Reply-To: <9AAEDF491EF7CA48AB587781B8F5D7C60226B43C@srvxchg3.cablelabs.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2009 09:12:28.0278 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDD61160:01CA0C3E] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG milestones updated X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:12:47 -0000 Jean-Francois Mule skrev: > Check http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/mmusic-charter.html > > let us know if you have any comments and if we missed any WG item. > Regarding: Dec 2009 Submit revised RTSP spec for Proposed or Draft Standard (as appropriate) Currently, the existing ID can't go to anything else than Proposed. Thus we could remove the "or draft standard (as appropriate)" part. Cheers Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jose.Rey@eu.panasonic.com Tue Jul 28 03:01:29 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF953A6DAB for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:01:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmTJF--pwjnQ for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cluster-b.mailcontrol.com (cluster-b.mailcontrol.com [85.115.56.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20713A6DB2 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rly11b.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly11b.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n6SA1629026219 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:01:20 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly11b.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id n6SA0uIK025013 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:00:56 +0100 Received: from eundsmtpout02.pan.eu ([168.87.60.204]) by rly11b-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender ) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id n6SA0rqR024503; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:00:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from eundadmi02.pan.eu ([10.109.33.23]) by eundsmtpout02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.2) with ESMTP id 2009072811593489-17556 ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:59:34 +0200 Received: from VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de ([10.100.176.55]) by eundadmi02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.3) with ESMTP id 2009072811593300-49531 ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:59:33 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:58:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 In-Reply-To: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt Thread-Index: AcoD2VF3o3TIPu2xSUGYafdzX1QurALjuhHQ References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> To: "Magnus Westerlund" , X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Message-ID: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:57:40 +0200 From: "Jose Rey" X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 28.07.2009 11:59:33, Serialize by Router on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 28.07.2009 11:59:35, Serialize complete at 28.07.2009 11:59:35, Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/28/2009 11:59:34 AM, Serialize by Router on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/28/2009 12:00:55 PM, Serialize complete at 07/28/2009 12:00:55 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-09-20-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.66.1.121 Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:01:29 -0000 =20 Hi. I've got a question regarding ANNOUNCE and PLAY_NOTIFY. What is the = relation between ANNOUNCE, as per = http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01.txt, and = PLAY_NOTIFY specified in this draft? They have something in common, but = ANNOUNCE is much more ellaborated. Are there plans to merge the two or replace one for the other?=20 Thanks, Jos=E9 > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org=20 > [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 6:45 PM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line=20 > Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Multiparty Multimedia=20 > Session Control Working Group of the IETF. >=20 >=20 > Title : Real Time Streaming Protocol 2.0 (RTSP) > Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne, et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt > Pages : 282 > Date : 2009-07-13 >=20 > This memorandum defines RTSP version 2.0 which obsoletes RTSP=20 > version 1.0 which is defined in RFC 2326. >=20 > The Real Time Streaming Protocol, or RTSP, is an=20 > application-level protocol for setup and control of the=20 > delivery of data with real-time properties. RTSP provides an=20 > extensible framework to enable controlled, on-demand delivery=20 > of real-time data, such as audio and video. Sources of data=20 > can include both live data feeds and stored clips. This=20 > protocol is intended to control multiple data delivery=20 > sessions, provide a means for choosing delivery channels such=20 > as UDP, multicast UDP and TCP, and provide a means for=20 > choosing delivery mechanisms based upon RTP (RFC 3550). >=20 > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326b > is-22.txt >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail=20 > reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII=20 > version of the Internet-Draft. >=20 Panasonic R=26D Center Germany GmbH 63225 Langen=2C Hessen=2C Germany Reg=3A AG Offenbach =28Hessen=29 HRB 33974 Managing Director=3A Thomas Micke From hishigh@gmail.com Tue Jul 28 04:41:04 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FC63A6E83 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:41:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_84=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yeJqumO5Xjp4 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f173.google.com (mail-pz0-f173.google.com [209.85.222.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731303A6D97 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so641909pzk.29 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:41:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=OAAvxhxW+6OG1IKOnjaEsZo3U5HXPfW8QESC0S3EZpc=; b=YuQBYdt3wNBL75OUpLNZBJD5GTFwEFnLdI77f/C3SZZi7Ct7aVdiTfoORzTWG2T6+E 5m1yqQyj14I93HdQCg6JR3dUDVTj7zHHkoHOH2vnVA67k5s87uKLjfLb43fhcFqpdzqE /r9NaNgXR4LirZ98TFhVXA1sRcL/W4emKExvE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=WTqZzwjynUpyyNNT8oCiJyUWGBtKZsU+1HyUQzUxxt2vkw5Rtrr03233dxXm04ZFu+ 7YgSWrCC5/1fPMINa+FRdyv4omcjH5mUM8+x2s9q7rwFsjIbxxD05PxYyp5b7Db7Hj7q jydIcRwglt4fzq9Q4yuweZtcjd3NKmY7wIqFU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.9.9 with SMTP id m9mr1075570wfi.27.1248781260628; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:41:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:41:00 +0800 Message-ID: <8bd755250907280441p77e84feewfc74b2ee7d7c1144@mail.gmail.com> From: yunfei zhang To: mmusic@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e90a8071268d046fc28bc9 Subject: [MMUSIC] PPSP (P2P streaming protocol) final bar bof agenda X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:41:04 -0000 --001636e90a8071268d046fc28bc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,all, The PPSP (P2P streaming protocol) final bar bof agenda is updated as follows. Welcome to attend with us.Any suggestions and contributions are appreciated. PPSP Final Bar BoF-- IETF 75, Stockholm 2000-2200 Thursday,July 30,Room 300. Mailing list=A3=BAppsp@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ppsp Chair: Yunfei Zhang( zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com) Gonzalo Camarillo *( *gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com) (One more may involve) AD: Lars Eggert( lars.eggert@nokia.com) Agenda 1. Introduction and Agenda bashing (Chair,10') 2. Problem Statement (Yunfei Zhang, 40') draft-zhang-ppsp-problem-statement-04 3.Discussion =A3=A8All,20'=A3=A9 4. Other Drafts (the time length is variable depending on the above discussion time) ---- Protocol Analysis of PPlive, PPStream and UUSee by Interent Measurement (Yunfei Zhang,5') draft-zhang-ppsp-protocol-comparison-measurement-02 ----Chunk Discovery for P2P Streaming (Ning Zong, 10=A1=AF) draft-zong-ppsp-chunk-discovery-00 5. Discussion (All, 20') 6. Decisions and HUMs (All, 10') 7. Conclusions and Next Steps (Chairs/ADs, 5') BR Yunfei --001636e90a8071268d046fc28bc9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,all,<= /font>

   The PPSP (P2P streaming protocol) final = bar bof agenda is updated as follows. Welcome to attend with us.Any suggest= ions and contributions are appreciated.

  

  PPSP Fi= nal Bar BoF-- IETF 75, Stockholm

  2000-2200 Thursday,July 30,Room 300.

  Mailing list=A3=BAppsp@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pps= p

  Chair: Yunfe= i Zhang( zhangyunfei@chinamo= bile.com)

   &= nbsp;        Gonzalo Camarillo gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com)

   &= nbsp;        (One more may involve)

   AD: La= rs Eggert( lars.eggert@nokia.com

 

 

 

Agenda

1. Introduction and= Agenda bashing   <= span style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">       =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =           (Chair,1= 0')  <= /p>

          =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;    

2. Problem Statemen= t      &nbs= p;                  = ;     &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;       (Yunfei Zhang, 40')=

   draft-zhang-ppsp-problem-statement-= 04 

 

3.Discussion        =             &nb= sp;     &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;  =A3=A8All,20'= =A3=A9

 

4. Other Drafts (th= e time length is variable depending on the above discussion time)

  ---- Pr= otocol Analysis of PPlive, PPStream and UUSee by Interent Measurement        = ;            &n= bsp;      (Yunfei Zhang,5')

         draft-zhang-ppsp-protocol-compar= ison-measurement-02&n= bsp;

  ----Chunk Discovery for P2P Streaming =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;(Ning Zong, 10’)

        draft-z= ong-ppsp-chunk-discovery-00 

 

5.

 Discussion         =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;            =             &nb= sp;           (All, = 20')

 

6. Decisions and HUMs     &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;            &= nbsp;           &nbs= p;           (All, 10'= ;)

 

7. Conclusions and Next Steps   &n= bsp;            = ;            &n= bsp;            = ;            &n= bsp;            = ;            &n= bsp;            = ;            &n= bsp;   (Chairs/ADs, 5')   

 

 

          =             &nb= sp;            =      BR

          =             &nb= sp;            =        Yunfei

 
--001636e90a8071268d046fc28bc9-- From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Tue Jul 28 05:40:45 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F023A68DA for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:40:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.749 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VyWlLIg8vl80 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD193A67AD for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:40:44 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7c01ae00000498b-c1-4a6ef1cce200 Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id BF.D0.18827.CC1FE6A4; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:40:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.171]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:40:44 +0200 Received: from [153.88.53.79] ([153.88.53.79]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:40:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:40:43 +0200 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jose Rey References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> In-Reply-To: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2009 12:40:43.0879 (UTC) FILETIME=[9F727770:01CA0F80] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:40:45 -0000 Jose Rey skrev: > > Hi. > > I've got a question regarding ANNOUNCE and PLAY_NOTIFY. What is the relation between ANNOUNCE, as per http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01.txt, and PLAY_NOTIFY specified in this draft? They have something in common, but ANNOUNCE is much more ellaborated. > > Are there plans to merge the two or replace one for the other? PLAY_NOTIFY is based on the Announce draft. The base spec defines the parts it needs for the defined media control. Additional indications for reasons to deliver failures etc are not defined. However, note that the play_notify with end-of-stream message do include error codes for why delivery was cancelled in the "Request-Status" header. Cheers Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From Jose.Rey@eu.panasonic.com Tue Jul 28 23:57:30 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458C33A6957 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:57:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tfnXQoWitmTx for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cluster-j.mailcontrol.com (cluster-j.mailcontrol.com [85.115.54.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B203A6907 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rly16j.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly16j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n6T6v76t030986 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:57:28 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly16j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id n6T6uZmR027529 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:56:35 +0100 Received: from eundsmtpout02.pan.eu ([168.87.60.204]) by rly16j-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender ) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id n6T6uXwe027347; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:56:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from eundadmi02.pan.eu ([10.109.33.23]) by eundsmtpout02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.2) with ESMTP id 2009072908563293-23654 ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:56:32 +0200 Received: from VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de ([10.100.176.55]) by eundadmi02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.3) with ESMTP id 2009072908562082-68621 ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:56:20 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:55:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 In-Reply-To: <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt Thread-Index: AcoPgJc+6t509QgbQyywEmGab8inHwAIw0iA References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> To: "Magnus Westerlund" , "Jose Rey" X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Message-ID: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:55:59 +0200 From: "Jose Rey" X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 29.07.2009 08:56:20, Serialize by Router on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 29.07.2009 08:56:33, Serialize complete at 29.07.2009 08:56:33, Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/29/2009 08:56:32 AM, Serialize by Router on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/29/2009 08:56:35 AM, Serialize complete at 07/29/2009 08:56:35 AM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-09-20-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.74.1.126 Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:57:30 -0000 Hi Magnus.=20 Still one thing is not clear to me: is the method PLAY_NOTIFY itself = going to be kept in 2.0 as is or will it be extended with what's in the = ANNOUNCE draft (and so deprecate it)? It would seem to me that if = PLAY_NOTIFY and ANNOUNCE address the same functionality and have already = some codes in common, like end-of-stream, so the rest of codes could = also be added to it (?)=20 Thanks, Jos=E9 > -----Original Message----- > From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com]=20 > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:41 PM > To: Jose Rey > Cc: stiemerling@nw.neclab.eu; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt >=20 > Jose Rey skrev: > > =20 > > Hi. > >=20 > > I've got a question regarding ANNOUNCE and PLAY_NOTIFY.=20 > What is the relation between ANNOUNCE, as per=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01.tx > t, and PLAY_NOTIFY specified in this draft? They have=20 > something in common, but ANNOUNCE is much more ellaborated. > >=20 > > Are there plans to merge the two or replace one for the other?=20 >=20 > PLAY_NOTIFY is based on the Announce draft. The base spec=20 > defines the parts it needs for the defined media control.=20 > Additional indications for reasons to deliver failures etc=20 > are not defined. However, note that the play_notify with=20 > end-of-stream message do include error codes for why delivery=20 > was cancelled in the "Request-Status" header. >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Magnus Westerlund >=20 > IETF Transport Area Director > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > F=E4r=F6gatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 >=20 Panasonic R=26D Center Germany GmbH 63225 Langen=2C Hessen=2C Germany Reg=3A AG Offenbach =28Hessen=29 HRB 33974 Managing Director=3A Thomas Micke From alex.giladi@gmail.com Wed Jul 29 08:15:45 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E6D3A6F16 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:15:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aFRDyDqHc7V6 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AE83A6D91 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so27674bwz.37 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:15:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qKcfmzu7FAj6Oc1bjz+4ge+cjnTR2t1b+uhaspXHLu4=; b=Nz6+UjSZOSbNjycAsKJ4y/DmUn5UUosrEbLYbcPqiD10u3/fjLZJXIxGc7yEMsabMO ErXh1X6YBCCrMz2ErlXeifNAljNEoyeNgZwfriZK3SculQ5JuU6IYiJaNSfH2oXWC0QQ 2pLUCyYcIDPZjyTo7R5jK5xNRtIU5mbtZ3F0A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rgEkjJCfiGGHKz5p036VOQpjobiJ/9zdJ1tpc64gOyGfFAGwZuWA/pberls3LzhA83 HgKi+m5/nCCGS0JxX/kkJqGiTZMWBWk3vRB9LgCeup5q5VUsvLYRGaVH94dIIHglUtUc 77EA2zjU0H+r4QPfKdzNsvk82kTxT9KchW08I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.59.145 with SMTP id l17mr5704524bkh.28.1248880539839; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:15:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:15:39 -0500 Message-ID: <57a9e15d0907290815q1a5801e5r801573b13f67b13f@mail.gmail.com> From: Alex Giladi To: Jose Rey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Magnus Westerlund , mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:15:45 -0000 FWIW, a lot of STB's and VoD servers use the codes and syntax specified in draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01 with RTSP 1.0. Alex On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Jose Rey wrote: > Hi Magnus. > > Still one thing is not clear to me: is the method PLAY_NOTIFY itself goin= g to be kept in 2.0 as is or will it be extended with what's in the ANNOUNC= E draft (and so deprecate it)? It would seem to me that if PLAY_NOTIFY and = ANNOUNCE address the same functionality and have already some codes in comm= on, like end-of-stream, so the rest of codes could also be added to it (?) > > Thanks, > > Jos=C3=A9 > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:41 PM >> To: Jose Rey >> Cc: stiemerling@nw.neclab.eu; mmusic@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt >> >> Jose Rey skrev: >> > >> > Hi. >> > >> > I've got a question regarding ANNOUNCE and PLAY_NOTIFY. >> What is the relation between ANNOUNCE, =C2=A0as per >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01.tx >> t, and =C2=A0PLAY_NOTIFY specified in this draft? They have >> something in common, but ANNOUNCE is much more ellaborated. >> > >> > Are there plans to merge the two or replace one for the other? >> >> PLAY_NOTIFY is based on the Announce draft. The base spec >> defines the parts it needs for the defined media control. >> Additional indications for reasons to deliver failures etc >> are not defined. However, note that the play_notify with >> end-of-stream message do include error codes for why delivery >> was cancelled in the "Request-Status" header. >> >> Cheers >> >> Magnus Westerlund >> >> IETF Transport Area Director >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Ericsson AB =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0| Pho= ne =C2=A0+46 10 7148287 >> F=C3=A4r=C3=B6gatan 6 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0| Mobile +46 73 0949079 >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > Panasonic R&D Center Germany GmbH > 63225 Langen, Hessen, Germany > Reg: AG Offenbach (Hessen) HRB 33974 > Managing Director: Thomas Micke > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > From magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com Wed Jul 29 08:19:08 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97F63A6AA1 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.613 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.613 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5m0LpqInXCTk for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw5.ericsson.se (mailgw5.ericsson.se [193.180.251.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED2E3A6830 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:19:07 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb24-b7c01ae00000498b-3a-4a70686b7062 Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw5.ericsson.se (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 8F.58.18827.B68607A4; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:19:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.171]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:19:07 +0200 Received: from [153.88.54.121] ([153.88.54.121]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:19:07 +0200 Message-ID: <4A70686A.7000005@ericsson.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:19:06 +0200 From: Magnus Westerlund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jose Rey References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> In-Reply-To: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2009 15:19:07.0055 (UTC) FILETIME=[EA31CBF0:01CA105F] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:19:08 -0000 Jose Rey skrev: > Hi Magnus. > > Still one thing is not clear to me: is the method PLAY_NOTIFY itself going to be kept in 2.0 as is or will it be extended with what's in the ANNOUNCE draft (and so deprecate it)? It would seem to me that if PLAY_NOTIFY and ANNOUNCE address the same functionality and have already some codes in common, like end-of-stream, so the rest of codes could also be added to it (?) Hi Jose, Lets go look at the history from RTSP 1.0 to today for RTSP 2.0. Announce was removed early in the update history due to uncertanties in the semantics. Primarily intended to upload session description with record. As record was removed, announce also disappeard. Later there was these suggestions for announce as in the draft. This was not accepted in full, but only the parts that the RTSP 2.0 core specification do needs. Some things was modified in how they work. For example error codes for the PLAY request can be included in Request-Status header in a PLAY_NOTIFY request. Thus a number of the Notice in the document are covered. Thus a question to you, which from the ANNOUNCE draft do think needs to be added to the RTSP core in some way? Cheers Magnus Westerlund IETF Transport Area Director ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From bob_gilman@comcast.net Wed Jul 29 09:30:36 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59C43A704E for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3faQIv9bRro6 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10E93A7074 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OMTA24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by QMTA02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Mpup1c0051zF43QA2sWeSM; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:30:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([67.176.84.91]) by OMTA24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MsYf1c00C1yDsSj8ksYgXY; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:32:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4A707927.6070707@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:30:31 -0600 From: Bob Gilman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hadriel Kaplan References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:30:36 -0000 Hadriel- My apologies for the delay, but I have a few comments on your reply to Simo, embedded below. -Bob Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com >> [mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 >> 7:23 AM >> >> Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken a look >> at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, >> which also defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we >> are planning to submit an updated version soon (with minimal >> changes). > > Heh, that's funny - nope hadn't seen that draft before. > > The concepts are obviously similar, though different in the following > ways: 1) The boucadair draft does not to tie the ccap concept to > sdp-cap-neg in any way. Specifically, we did not want to make > implementers have to support sdp-cap-neg just to offer alternate > addresses for v4/v6. Sdp-cap-neg is a fairly complex mechanism for > people who don't need it. [rrg]: If you don't want make it part of capability negotiation, then perhaps you could rename the attribute to not end in "cap". It could be a little confusing to work it into the Cap Neg model with a line like: a=acap:1 ccap:2 IP6 2001:db8::1 45678 and it just complicates the problem of formulating a more general Cap Neg attribute that includes IN addresses or CT addresses, (or even AC addresses - RFC 1149). > > 2) We assumed in the boucadair draft that a host could not > necessarily use the same UDP/TCP/etc. port numbers for the alternate > address, since they're different number spaces, so we include the > port number in the ccap attribute. [rrg]: This is a very good point, and it should apply to capabilities negotiation as well. We need to add an optional parameter to our ccap attribute to carry a port number when the is "IN". > > 3) Since we include the port number in the ccap in the boucadair > draft, and the port number is specific to the media line, we do not > allow the ccap at the session level - only the media level. [rrg]: Since draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01 specifies that its ccap attribute always be interpreted at the media level, I see no reason its presence should not be confined to the media level as well. > > 4) The boucadair draft is for the alternate address/port connection > concept only, and not for any other capabilities. This was done on > purpose, because the only goal was to have a workable replacement > model for ANAT for v4/v6, so we wanted any claims of compliance to > the draft to be for the specific support of ccap. [rrg]: I worry that solving the specific case might complicate the solution for the more general case as mentioned above. > > -hadriel > _______________________________________________ > mmusic > mailing list mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > -Bob ------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Gilman bob_gilman@comcast.net +1 303 898 9780 From HKaplan@acmepacket.com Thu Jul 30 00:40:13 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EB428C0F5 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.555 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nEBNlyFY6AlR for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4DB28C16B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:39:40 -0400 Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:39:40 -0400 From: Hadriel Kaplan To: Bob Gilman Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:39:39 -0400 Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: AcoQafTNdDdiPIpBTSS46Z0N7T55QgAfqtOg Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4A707927.6070707@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4A707927.6070707@comcast.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:40:13 -0000 Thanks for your comments Bob - I'll raise the attr name during the presenta= tion of the draft (which will be in the next hour or so). Can you describe what the use-cases are for a more "general" approach for a= lternative connection IP addresses? -hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Gilman [mailto:bob_gilman@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:31 PM > To: Hadriel Kaplan > Cc: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT >=20 > Hadriel- > My apologies for the delay, but I have a few comments on your reply to > Simo, embedded below. > -Bob >=20 > Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com > >> [mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 > >> 7:23 AM > >> > >> Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken a look > >> at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, > >> which also defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we > >> are planning to submit an updated version soon (with minimal > >> changes). > > > > Heh, that's funny - nope hadn't seen that draft before. > > > > The concepts are obviously similar, though different in the following > > ways: 1) The boucadair draft does not to tie the ccap concept to > > sdp-cap-neg in any way. Specifically, we did not want to make > > implementers have to support sdp-cap-neg just to offer alternate > > addresses for v4/v6. Sdp-cap-neg is a fairly complex mechanism for > > people who don't need it. > [rrg]: If you don't want make it part of capability negotiation, then > perhaps you could rename the attribute to not end in "cap". > It could be a little confusing to work it into the Cap Neg model > with a line like: > a=3Dacap:1 ccap:2 IP6 2001:db8::1 45678 > and it just complicates the problem of formulating a more general > Cap Neg attribute that includes IN addresses or CT addresses, (or > even AC addresses - RFC 1149). > > > > 2) We assumed in the boucadair draft that a host could not > > necessarily use the same UDP/TCP/etc. port numbers for the alternate > > address, since they're different number spaces, so we include the > > port number in the ccap attribute. > [rrg]: This is a very good point, and it should apply to capabilities > negotiation as well. We need to add an optional parameter to > our ccap attribute to carry a port number when the > is "IN". > > > > 3) Since we include the port number in the ccap in the boucadair > > draft, and the port number is specific to the media line, we do not > > allow the ccap at the session level - only the media level. > [rrg]: Since draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01 specifies that its > ccap attribute always be interpreted at the media level, I see > no reason its presence should not be confined to the media level > as well. > > > > 4) The boucadair draft is for the alternate address/port connection > > concept only, and not for any other capabilities. This was done on > > purpose, because the only goal was to have a workable replacement > > model for ANAT for v4/v6, so we wanted any claims of compliance to > > the draft to be for the specific support of ccap. > [rrg]: I worry that solving the specific case might complicate the > solution for the more general case as mentioned above. > > > > -hadriel > > _______________________________________________ > > mmusic > > mailing list mmusic@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > > -Bob > ------------------------------------------------------------- > Bob Gilman bob_gilman@comcast.net +1 303 898 9780 >=20 From ron.even.tlv@gmail.com Thu Jul 30 00:41:01 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A728F28C126; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:41:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72zP72Q62qok; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DA43A7166; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so415395bwz.37 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=bV5fT9qY4gBnM9vfda1TvFuer0IRDladBv+qqLVKf0Q=; b=BLOmWP5NduuniUydtEuoojyGPgmWzJEE6xsAUl0lN1l0tSrUPqi6wYEs4I5E/h9eWW f2CpANWn5M1+lEC0SkCrFnEx1e5SSIQuRN3fIqGon4Np+e//WZOwCfEoM60/QcqK7VZE PGflEkD+pPTol2B/bAqggqqOytlLlitDj5F+E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; b=K2I1rHPj89VJWMm2pG0f6iMmvvTvw8MTbcE0NpYR42HOSEEgFCkOGmJgHtdMIsTLGl LEP+96hsEOXPUjDTqRNcoYOa4W4/ZuExIqqQ/HEEP9PuXGMqc1/H6zjQOJMId2sSapvB SYjoXghk035XnpuHpK2KbtSbcNuIssUCpV4RA= Received: by 10.103.168.3 with SMTP id v3mr467252muo.58.1248939657753; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows8d787f9 (dhcp-17b3.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.23.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y6sm11036625mug.40.2009.07.30.00.40.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:40:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Roni Even" To: , , References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:39:10 +0300 Message-ID: <4a714e88.06e2660a.49c9.6a19@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LABK6XTeA= Content-Language: en-us Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:41:01 -0000 Hi, This functionality is part of the capability negotiation framework. It was in the media capability negotiation and was moved according to WG request to draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01 Roni Even > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 2:44 PM > To: mmusic@ietf.org; sipping@ietf.org > Subject: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >=20 >=20 >=20 > Dear all, >=20 > This draft has been submitted. >=20 > Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Med >=20 >=20 > -----Message d'origine----- > De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce- > bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Envoy=E9 : = lundi > 6 juillet 2009 11:45 =C0 : i-d-announce@ietf.org Objet : I-D > Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. >=20 > Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Connectivity > Capability (CCAP) Attribute > Author(s) : M. Boucadair, H. Kaplan > Filename : draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2009-07-06 >=20 > This memo proposes a mechanism which allows to carry multiple IP > addresses, of different address families (e.g., IPv4, IPv6), in the > same SDP offer/answer. The proposed attribute solves the backward > compatibility problem which plagued ANAT, due to its syntax. >=20 > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. From HKaplan@acmepacket.com Thu Jul 30 00:43:25 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A5828C16C; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:43:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.557 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dvp3JOISmdfV; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5202428C130; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:43:24 -0400 Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:43:25 -0400 From: Hadriel Kaplan To: Roni Even , "mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com" , "mmusic@ietf.org" , "sipping@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:43:24 -0400 Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LABK6XTeAAACQkkA== Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4a714e88.06e2660a.49c9.6a19@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <4a714e88.06e2660a.49c9.6a19@mx.google.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:43:25 -0000 Ah, yes we learned it was in that draft. (I thought you meant in the curren= t WG cap-neg drafts) I'll be mentioning that today in the presentation. Thanks! -hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Roni Even > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:39 AM > To: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com; mmusic@ietf.org; > sipping@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt >=20 > Hi, > This functionality is part of the capability negotiation framework. > It was in the media capability negotiation and was moved according to WG > request to draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-01 >=20 > Roni Even >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com > > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 2:44 PM > > To: mmusic@ietf.org; sipping@ietf.org > > Subject: [MMUSIC] TR: I-D Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > This draft has been submitted. > > > > Comments and suggestions are more than welcome. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce- > > bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Envoy=E9 : lun= di > > 6 juillet 2009 11:45 =C0 : i-d-announce@ietf.org Objet : I-D > > Action:draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > > > Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Connectivity > > Capability (CCAP) Attribute > > Author(s) : M. Boucadair, H. Kaplan > > Filename : draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt > > Pages : 14 > > Date : 2009-07-06 > > > > This memo proposes a mechanism which allows to carry multiple IP > > addresses, of different address families (e.g., IPv4, IPv6), in the > > same SDP offer/answer. The proposed attribute solves the backward > > compatibility problem which plagued ANAT, due to its syntax. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-boucadair-mmusic-ccap-00.txt > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > > Internet-Draft. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic From ron.even.tlv@gmail.com Thu Jul 30 00:45:19 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A123A7133 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:45:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.499 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z741L6aZT5Hv for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBC828C1A1 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so478177fxm.42 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=NtchlisCEf7ugMbFL6itgSsr8+qLrzBpP40mbxw8dfY=; b=Itz8qUGImX3X0ZarB4zrjJnps6ew4IZ4mOR0WFkIN2klckFCGzEIgIilrHC2pQ0Zrs Q+s5i2tRrSYKEFL559kbw1h9FlWg0o4np4C2mkVDy4QNF38qYoyOXQXgo7G3LXdo3siF G4KnKlf33040674ySh4ID8pEk69pmKJ0idvf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; b=OJG2dCTuqG0m4hDKZ82mOKCL0lueeJYEqd5Lyf7IAf4Ln6b+gnoMYbJYWsUS0Duu+O +VYaRwLyJ2hkAISMVb+dfjmeSOJOEKvdu+9b4wjZrEokL4VU2XC9Qa7pH8vv+mEbgVJ4 /UPwyzvZYGLeAf7wgQVrRyuxw3bkkYSnoUcE0= Received: by 10.103.167.14 with SMTP id u14mr461574muo.81.1248939875918; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows8d787f9 (dhcp-17b3.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.23.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2sm4912072mue.20.2009.07.30.00.44.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:44:35 -0700 (PDT) From: "Roni Even" To: , , References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:42:47 +0300 Message-ID: <4a714f63.02a1660a.40cd.0c70@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAAgkgEAAA5LAuAETrbMAA== Content-Language: en-us Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:45:19 -0000 Simo, The reason for not offering different ports in cap negotiation work is to not replace ICE Roni Even > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 12:43 PM > To: HKaplan@acmepacket.com; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: ext Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:HKaplan@acmepacket.com] > >Sent: 08 July, 2009 06:01 > >To: Veikkolainen Simo (Nokia-D/Helsinki); mmusic@ietf.org > >Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com > >Subject: RE: A replacement for ANAT > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com > >[mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 7:23 AM > >> > >> Sorry for missing the discussion on SIPPING. Have you taken > >a look at > >> > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap-00, which > >> also defines a ccap attribute? The draft has exprired, but we are > >> planning to submit an updated version soon (with minimal changes). > > > >Heh, that's funny - nope hadn't seen that draft before. > > > >The concepts are obviously similar, though different in the > >following ways: > >1) The boucadair draft does not to tie the ccap concept to > >sdp-cap-neg in any way. Specifically, we did not want to make > >implementers have to support sdp-cap-neg just to offer > >alternate addresses for v4/v6. Sdp-cap-neg is a fairly > >complex mechanism for people who don't need it. > > > >2) We assumed in the boucadair draft that a host could not > >necessarily use the same UDP/TCP/etc. port numbers for the > >alternate address, since they're different number spaces, so > >we include the port number in the ccap attribute. > > > >3) Since we include the port number in the ccap in the > >boucadair draft, and the port number is specific to the media > >line, we do not allow the ccap at the session level - only the > >media level. > > > >4) The boucadair draft is for the alternate address/port > >connection concept only, and not for any other capabilities. > >This was done on purpose, because the only goal was to have a > >workable replacement model for ANAT for v4/v6, so we wanted > >any claims of compliance to the draft to be for the specific > >support of ccap. > > The ccap attribute as defined in the boucadair draft seems to borrow > its syntax from sdp cap-neg, but is otherwise totally independent; but > I guess this was your intention. Actually, you probably could remove > any references to sdp-cap-neg without losing any of the functionality > you have described. > > You could use the definitions in draft-garcia-mmusic-sdp-misc-cap for > the address capability part, but you would still need the port number > indicated as a capability. This is not defined currently in any of the > related drafts (sdp-cap-neg, sdp-media-capabilities, sdp-misc-cap). > > Simo > > >-hadriel > > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic From oran@cisco.com Thu Jul 30 01:40:00 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE53F28C18F for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:40:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.558 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZsY75+hXzQI for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242C128C18B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:40:00 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEALf5cEqrR7PE/2dsb2JhbAC5KYgnkBcFhBGBTg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,294,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="356891816" Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2009 08:40:02 +0000 Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6U8e2wc013608 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 01:40:02 -0700 Received: from sjc-vpnasa-710.cisco.com (sjc-vpnasa-710.cisco.com [10.21.106.201]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6U8e0KR025501 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:40:01 GMT Message-Id: From: David R Oran To: mmusic@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:39:59 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2335; t=1248943202; x=1249807202; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=oran@cisco.com; z=From:=20David=20R=20Oran=20 |Subject:=20Quick=20written=20version=20of=20the=20taxonomy =20of=20alternatives=20I=20mentioned=20at=20the=20mic=20at=2 0the=20end=20of=20the=20SIP/RTSP=20discussion |Sender:=20; bh=pyFriQXvS1kXy4D6iNIsPqaKcJEEvbyXKzCPUo43tNs=; b=Zq4pL1LHeitT9HbsPmyi724HjGhxAaawCc2ngJTsc1eM0zP8rjlRrdmQmK gwpoUvvvFzkdP1B1GyphPU9jIbfWiSOA/RrwoW4jzrqFQYzCridCVx6zJQPk AdBUccM7vi; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=oran@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); Subject: [MMUSIC] Quick written version of the taxonomy of alternatives I mentioned at the mic at the end of the SIP/RTSP discussion X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:40:01 -0000 Since it seems the WG didn't sow much support for gluing the existing SIP and RTCP protocols together as proposed in the sip-rtsp draft, I offered three alternatives that might represent a decent technical way forward and that meet the same (technical) goals as articulated in the draft. They clearly don't meet the goal of trying to use SIP and RTSP "as-is". 1. Do a "system reset" on the RTSPv2 specification in order to make it capable of being used in the same overall signaling architecture the proponents today use SIP for (e.g. IMS environments). This entails giving up on full backward compatibility with RTSP v1 (which we don't have in practice anyway, and we have no RTSPv2 deployment yet to worry much about). We would re-cast RTSPv2 to use SDP offer-answer and ICE exactly as they are used by SIP, instead of the hybrid media description used in the current RTSPv2 specification. We could also import the P-header extension set to get the same IMS features for RTSP as we have for SIP. This would preserve the existing RTSP addressing model, its media source selection model, and its failover model, none of which are straightforward with SIP. 2. Design a new in-session control protocol for the media servers to give SIP sessions the same media control capabilities that exist in RTSP (e.g. play/pause/ff etc.). This would be negotiated with SDP offer answer just like the media itself and other in-session control schemes like floor control in conferences. 3. Adopt MRCPv2 as an in-session media control protocol. MRCPv2 arguably has EVERYTHING needed - play, pause, scale, skip, etc. and is already fully integrated with SIP and deployed enough to have confidence that it will glue together correctly. The disadvantage is the MRCPv2 is gross overkill for the simple media control problem. It might be possible to define a minimal subset or "profile" that would be light weight, but I haven't even begun to think through the details to see if this would be easy or hard. As an designer/implementer of both media servers and embedded streaming media clients, I find any of these more attractive than trying to glue SIP and RTSP together using interworking, state machine tricks, etc. Thanks for listening, DaveO. From HKaplan@acmepacket.com Thu Jul 30 02:15:13 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5D728C1F1 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:15:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.558 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UsXHV-Ezk-Ec for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFFB28C278 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:15:13 -0400 Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:15:13 -0400 From: Hadriel Kaplan To: Roni Even , "Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com" , "mmusic@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:15:12 -0400 Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT Thread-Index: Acn+Ht6b7BCUGPf8Sx21Vd9MnFbb/wAD2+LAACQixBAADQRQgAAgkgEAAA5LAuAETrbMAAADMw1g Message-ID: References: <08BA2C59E081884DB2AAE4A0BE9D6DC1368EAB@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4a714f63.02a1660a.40cd.0c70@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <4a714f63.02a1660a.40cd.0c70@mx.google.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:15:13 -0000 I'm confused by this - how does offering different *addresses* in sdp-cap n= ot "replace" ICE, but offering different ports does replace it? -hadriel > -----Original Message----- > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:43 AM > To: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com; Hadriel Kaplan; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] A replacement for ANAT >=20 > Simo, > The reason for not offering different ports in cap negotiation work is to > not replace ICE > Roni Even >=20 From Jose.Rey@eu.panasonic.com Thu Jul 30 03:31:23 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D973A68CF for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:31:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3E4uC-UNxea4 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:31:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cluster-j.mailcontrol.com (cluster-j.mailcontrol.com [85.115.54.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EFD3A67D7 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rly53j.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly53j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n6UAUx9l001246 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:31:22 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly53j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id n6UAU2nr029744 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:30:02 +0100 Received: from eundsmtpout02.pan.eu ([168.87.60.204]) by rly53j-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender ) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id n6UATxnp029382; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:30:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from eundadmi02.pan.eu ([10.109.33.23]) by eundsmtpout02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.2) with ESMTP id 2009073012295616-35472 ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:29:56 +0200 Received: from VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de ([10.100.176.55]) by eundadmi02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.3) with ESMTP id 2009073012295491-100649 ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:29:54 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:29:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 In-Reply-To: <4A70686A.7000005@ericsson.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt Thread-Index: AcoQX9ygsxJv37IcQJaCcISVgj2CAAAoBUJA References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <4A70686A.7000005@ericsson.com> To: "Magnus Westerlund" , "Jose Rey" X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Message-ID: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332DEA@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:29:33 +0200 From: "Jose Rey" X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 30.07.2009 12:29:54, Serialize by Router on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 30.07.2009 12:29:56, Serialize complete at 30.07.2009 12:29:56, Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/30/2009 12:29:56 PM, Serialize by Router on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/30/2009 12:30:00 PM, Serialize complete at 07/30/2009 12:30:00 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-09-20-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.74.1.163 Cc: mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:31:24 -0000 Magnus, Inline... > -----Original Message----- > From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:19 PM > To: Jose Rey > Cc: stiemerling@nw.neclab.eu; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt >=20 > Jose Rey skrev: > > Hi Magnus.=20 > >=20 > > Still one thing is not clear to me: is the method=20 > PLAY_NOTIFY itself=20 > > going to be kept in 2.0 as is or will it be extended with what's in=20 > > the ANNOUNCE draft (and so deprecate it)? It would seem to=20 > me that if=20 > > PLAY_NOTIFY and ANNOUNCE address the same functionality and have=20 > > already some codes in common, like end-of-stream, so the=20 > rest of codes=20 > > could also be added to it (?) >=20 > Hi Jose, >=20 > Lets go look at the history from RTSP 1.0 to today for RTSP 2.0. > Announce was removed early in the update history due to=20 > uncertanties in the semantics. Primarily intended to upload=20 > session description with record. As record was removed,=20 > announce also disappeard. Ok, I was unaware how some of ANNOUNCE got into the base spec. Thanks = for that. >=20 > Later there was these suggestions for announce as in the=20 > draft. This was not accepted in full, but only the parts that=20 > the RTSP 2.0 core specification do needs. Some things was=20 > modified in how they work. For example error codes for the=20 > PLAY request can be included in Request-Status header in a=20 > PLAY_NOTIFY request. Thus a number of the Notice in the=20 > document are covered. >=20 > Thus a question to you, which from the ANNOUNCE draft do=20 > think needs to be added to the RTSP core in some way? >=20 I thought of beginning-of-stream but I've been told by your colleague = Jan Lindquist that this is already possible with the functionality in = RTSP 2.0. Thanks, Jos=E9 > Cheers >=20 > Magnus Westerlund >=20 > IETF Transport Area Director > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 > F=E4r=F6gatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 >=20 Panasonic R=26D Center Germany GmbH 63225 Langen=2C Hessen=2C Germany Reg=3A AG Offenbach =28Hessen=29 HRB 33974 Managing Director=3A Thomas Micke From Jose.Rey@eu.panasonic.com Thu Jul 30 03:32:42 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F51E3A69AD for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:32:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsxeoYH9GJcM for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cluster-j.mailcontrol.com (cluster-j.mailcontrol.com [85.115.54.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B13A67D7 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rly20j.srv.mailcontrol.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly20j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with ESMTP id n6UAVpUN024363 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:31:56 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rly20j.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) id n6UAVBZm020213 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:31:11 +0100 Received: from eundsmtpout02.pan.eu ([168.87.60.204]) by rly20j-eth0.srv.mailcontrol.com (envelope-sender ) (MIMEDefang) with ESMTP id n6UAUSJO016252; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:31:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from eundadmi02.pan.eu ([10.109.33.23]) by eundsmtpout02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.2) with ESMTP id 2009073012310560-35494 ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:31:05 +0200 Received: from VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de ([10.100.176.55]) by eundadmi02.pan.eu (Lotus Domino Release 7.0.3) with ESMTP id 2009073012310446-100703 ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:31:04 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by VPN-MRelay-01.PRDCG.Panasonic.de; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:30:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 In-Reply-To: <57a9e15d0907290815q1a5801e5r801573b13f67b13f@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt Thread-Index: AcoQX13qVbRhkGAwQOeJuCX3qMI6cwAoV+8A References: <20090713164502.1FF803A6E6D@core3.amsl.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332CA3@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <4A6EF1CB.5080502@ericsson.com> <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332D1B@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> <57a9e15d0907290815q1a5801e5r801573b13f67b13f@mail.gmail.com> To: "Alex Giladi" , "Jose Rey" X-TNEFEvaluated: 1 Message-ID: <1FEB9B9F2EC38343955D02B2AE86AACB01332DEB@lan-ex-02.panasonic.de> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:30:58 +0200 From: "Jose Rey" X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 30.07.2009 12:31:04, Serialize by Router on EUNDADMI02/EUR/Matsushita(Release 7.0.3|September 26, 2007) at 30.07.2009 12:31:05, Serialize complete at 30.07.2009 12:31:05, Itemize by SMTP Server on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/30/2009 12:31:05 PM, Serialize by Router on EUNDSMTPOUT02/EUR/PANEXTOUT(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 07/30/2009 12:31:09 PM, Serialize complete at 07/30/2009 12:31:09 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-09-20-00 (www.mailcontrol.com) on 10.74.1.130 Cc: Magnus Westerlund , mmusic@ietf.org Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:32:42 -0000 Alex, Thanks for the info. I assume these servers are in walled garden = environments?=20 Cheers, Jos=E9=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Giladi [mailto:alex.giladi@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:16 PM > To: Jose Rey > Cc: Magnus Westerlund; mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt >=20 > FWIW, a lot of STB's and VoD servers use the codes and syntax=20 > specified in draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01 with RTSP 1.0. > Alex >=20 > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Jose=20 > Rey wrote: > > Hi Magnus. > > > > Still one thing is not clear to me: is the method=20 > PLAY_NOTIFY itself=20 > > going to be kept in 2.0 as is or will it be extended with what's in=20 > > the ANNOUNCE draft (and so deprecate it)? It would seem to=20 > me that if=20 > > PLAY_NOTIFY and ANNOUNCE address the same functionality and have=20 > > already some codes in common, like end-of-stream, so the=20 > rest of codes=20 > > could also be added to it (?) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jos=E9 > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Magnus Westerlund [mailto:magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 2:41 PM > >> To: Jose Rey > >> Cc: stiemerling@nw.neclab.eu; mmusic@ietf.org > >> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] I-D=20 > Action:draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-22.txt > >> > >> Jose Rey skrev: > >> > > >> > Hi. > >> > > >> > I've got a question regarding ANNOUNCE and PLAY_NOTIFY. > >> What is the relation between ANNOUNCE, =A0as per=20 > >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-stiemerling-rtsp-announce-01.tx > >> t, and =A0PLAY_NOTIFY specified in this draft? They have=20 > something in=20 > >> common, but ANNOUNCE is much more ellaborated. > >> > > >> > Are there plans to merge the two or replace one for the other? > >> > >> PLAY_NOTIFY is based on the Announce draft. The base spec=20 > defines the=20 > >> parts it needs for the defined media control. > >> Additional indications for reasons to deliver failures etc are not=20 > >> defined. However, note that the play_notify with end-of-stream=20 > >> message do include error codes for why delivery was=20 > cancelled in the=20 > >> "Request-Status" header. > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Magnus Westerlund > >> > >> IETF Transport Area Director > >>=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> - Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM > >>=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> - Ericsson AB =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0| Phone =A0+46 10 = 7148287=20 > F=E4r=F6gatan 6 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 > >> | Mobile +46 73 0949079 > >> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com > >>=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> - > >> > >> > > > > > > Panasonic R&D Center Germany GmbH > > 63225 Langen, Hessen, Germany > > Reg: AG Offenbach (Hessen) HRB 33974 > > Managing Director: Thomas Micke > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mmusic mailing list > > mmusic@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic > > >=20 >=20 Panasonic R=26D Center Germany GmbH 63225 Langen=2C Hessen=2C Germany Reg=3A AG Offenbach =28Hessen=29 HRB 33974 Managing Director=3A Thomas Micke From jan.lindquist@ericsson.com Thu Jul 30 03:58:11 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78263A6C22 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:58:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vxLRxVdg3mN5 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCEF3A6BD3 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:58:10 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b7b53ae000004f0b-66-4a717cc12463 Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1B.8E.20235.1CC717A4; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from esealmw106.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.69]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:57:19 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:56:06 +0200 Message-ID: <8FE6AA8853337149919BB383582462F70357684E@esealmw106.eemea.ericsson.se> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Quick written version of the taxonomy of alternatives Imentioned at the mic at the end of the SIP/RTSP discussion Thread-Index: AcoQ8VdnH7I6AXwyQj+4mT+VTJUrGgAERMjA References: From: "Jan Lindquist" To: "David R Oran" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2009 10:57:19.0360 (UTC) FILETIME=[82178000:01CA1104] X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Quick written version of the taxonomy of alternatives Imentioned at the mic at the end of the SIP/RTSP discussion X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:58:11 -0000 Hello David, At this stage I am not going to suggest that in ietf we try to glue SIP with RTSP. What has been done by other SDO's is reflection of a need in the area and it reflects in my view a need to perform an evaluation. The simplest as you have suggest would simply to adopt MRCP but as you have reflected I have to agree it is an overkill. One of objectives by the authors of the draft is not to create yet another protocol for trick play. We want to reuse as much as possible. As a developer it allows for maximum reuseability if based on the framework provided by RTSP.=20 Again I do not want to conclude the direction that is taken but I think it is important that ietf takes an active role in the area or further work will be done outside the influence of ietf. Regards, JanL > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org=20 > [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David R Oran > Sent: den 30 juli 2009 10:40 > To: mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: [MMUSIC] Quick written version of the taxonomy of=20 > alternatives Imentioned at the mic at the end of the SIP/RTSP=20 > discussion >=20 > Since it seems the WG didn't sow much support for gluing the=20 > existing SIP and RTCP protocols together as proposed in the=20 > sip-rtsp draft, I offered three alternatives that might=20 > represent a decent technical way forward and that meet the=20 > same (technical) goals as articulated in the draft. They=20 > clearly don't meet the goal of trying to use SIP and RTSP "as-is". >=20 > 1. Do a "system reset" on the RTSPv2 specification in order=20 > to make it capable of being used in the same overall=20 > signaling architecture the proponents today use SIP for (e.g.=20 > IMS environments). This entails giving up on full backward=20 > compatibility with RTSP v1 (which we don't have in practice=20 > anyway, and we have no RTSPv2 deployment yet to worry much=20 > about). We would re-cast RTSPv2 to use SDP offer-answer and=20 > ICE exactly as they are used by SIP, instead of the hybrid=20 > media description used in the current RTSPv2 specification.=20 > We could also import the P-header extension set to get the=20 > same IMS features for RTSP as we have for SIP. This would=20 > preserve the existing RTSP addressing model, its media source=20 > selection model, and its failover model, none of which are=20 > straightforward with SIP. >=20 > 2. Design a new in-session control protocol for the media=20 > servers to give SIP sessions the same media control=20 > capabilities that exist in RTSP (e.g. play/pause/ff etc.).=20 > This would be negotiated with SDP offer answer just like the=20 > media itself and other in-session control schemes like floor=20 > control in conferences. >=20 > 3. Adopt MRCPv2 as an in-session media control protocol.=20 > MRCPv2 arguably has EVERYTHING needed - play, pause, scale,=20 > skip, etc. and is already fully integrated with SIP and=20 > deployed enough to have confidence that it will glue together=20 > correctly. The disadvantage is the MRCPv2 is gross overkill=20 > for the simple media control problem. It might be possible to=20 > define a minimal subset or "profile" that would be light=20 > weight, but I haven't even begun to think through the details=20 > to see if this would be easy or hard. >=20 > As an designer/implementer of both media servers and embedded=20 > streaming media clients, I find any of these more attractive=20 > than trying to glue SIP and RTSP together using interworking,=20 > state machine tricks, etc. >=20 > Thanks for listening, >=20 > DaveO. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >=20 From Albrecht.Schwarz@alcatel-lucent.de Fri Jul 31 06:23:20 2009 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: mmusic@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA4F3A6EAF for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:23:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knxUiPKlZPYv for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E573A6B13 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRVELSBHS05.ad2.ad.alcatel.com (frvelsbhs05.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [155.132.6.77]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id n6VDMuMq002280; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:23:17 +0200 Received: from FRVELSMBS23.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.53]) by FRVELSBHS05.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:23:09 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:23:08 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Example correct? (draft-schwarz-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-examples-00.txt); RE: [Sip-implementors] Revised SDP O/A; RE: codec negotiation Thread-Index: AcoEQ1ytkR117aJeTzCbKJx0/vJuJwABD1tgAABg4oAAAAoT0AARs5owA1Psz3A= References: <4A5C1D70.1010702@evaristesys.com><95E7FD6C1C61F640B8A25C8ED11B17C8081086CB@HSP03.SLAN.LK><001601ca0446$69e83d50$6c4d220a@rildelhi.com><95E7FD6C1C61F640B8A25C8ED11B17C80810876C@HSP03.SLAN.LK> From: "Schwarz Albrecht" To: , "mmusic (E-mail)" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2009 13:23:09.0502 (UTC) FILETIME=[0BFEF5E0:01CA11E2] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.80 Subject: [MMUSIC] Example correct? (draft-schwarz-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-examples-00.txt); RE: [Sip-implementors] Revised SDP O/A; RE: codec negotiation X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:23:20 -0000 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schwarz-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer= -examples-00.txt Dear SDP Offer/Answer experts! Our draft provides an example in =A7 4.4.1.3, using the new SDP syntax = according revised SDP O/A: "SDP Capability Negotiation", = draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation =20 "SDP media capabilities Negotiation", = draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-media-capabilities Before progressing our draft we would appreciate any feedback, comments = by the SDP O/A experts. Thanks, Albrecht ___________________ A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. Title : Session Description Protocol (SDP) - Revised Offer/Answer = Protocol (SDPCapNeg & MediaCapNeg) - Offer/Answer Examples Author(s) : A. Schwarz, J. Stoetzer-Bradler Filename : draft-schwarz-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-examples-00.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2009-7-31 =09 This document gives examples of Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer/answer exchanges. The SDP offer/answer protocol was revised by [SDPCapNeg] and [MediaCapNeg] plus other extensions. Examples include the indication, negotiation and selection of media configurations ("codecs"). This document discusses examples of IP bearer emulation scenarios for PSTN modem calls in SIP-controlled VoIP networks. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schwarz-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer= -examples-00.txt > -----Original Message----- > From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu=20 > [mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On=20 > Behalf Of Schwarz Albrecht > Sent: Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 16:37 > To: Manoj Priyankara [TG]; Abhinesh Patil;=20 > sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Revised SDP O/A; RE: codec negotiation >=20 > Might be useful to look already in the revised SDP=20 > Offer/Answer protocol (which extends RFC 3264): >=20 >=20 > SDP Capability Negotiation (204109 bytes)=20 > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capa > bility-neg > otiation-10.txt >=20 > SDP media capabilities Negotiation (99351 bytes)=20 > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-medi > a-capabili > ties-08.txt >=20 > -Albrecht >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > [mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On=20 > Behalf Of=20 > > Manoj Priyankara [TG] > > Sent: Dienstag, 14. Juli 2009 07:37 > > To: Abhinesh Patil; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] codec negotiation > >=20 > > Thanks sir ! > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > ________________________________ > >=20 > > From: Abhinesh Patil [mailto:abhinesh.patil@rancoretech.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 11:16 AM > > To: Manoj Priyankara [TG]; sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] codec negotiation > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > You can read - RFC 3264 an Offer/Answer Model with the Session=20 > > Description Protocol (SDP) > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Thanks and regards, > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Abhinesh patil > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Rancore Technologies(P) Ltd > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > [mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On=20 > Behalf Of=20 > > Manoj Priyankara [TG] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 10:56 AM > > To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > Subject: [Sip-implementors] codec negotiation > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > Dear All, > >=20 > > Can somebody explain me how codec negotiation takes place in SIP?=20 > >=20 > > BR, > >=20 > > Manoj > >=20 > > =20 > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > >=20 > > Sip-implementors mailing list > >=20 > > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > >=20 > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip-implementors mailing list > > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >=20