Hello all,

=A0

Please express you= r opinion whether you would like to have below draft adopted=A0as the WG do= cument?

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt

=A0

Thanks,

=A0

-cochairs of WG

--001a11c3b114c7177f04ef5adfac-- From zehn.cao@gmail.com Tue Jan 7 19:16:31 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651C41AE2AD for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:16:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRQhKIaOAE8s for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com (mail-qe0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2061AE2A8 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:16:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ne12so1264554qeb.11 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:16:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=o6+uAK4iv4uuOtjCh/SaFIbDOBFPUHqpye9YkBkHVIk=; b=GAzewuWTh2SCFkT1PvTlb6oZyBUCMHqdxEC635+FnJk1WnJkQlVR9KvYp7vXMKyO9I KgfLe0+9ibnUTkDiM75eDAYOUNJm7VSvVSu9IXThaZw2wMig5OD5c1/eWsbWyrFi2vop CHehnpUr5cjEYTvB/YcVRfz3HEXChSoe3cTK0seNrx/W9spniYA6uYx2xXDhj/yaLN9V H3YXgr7k5tmmo6+bYSXN6HYuXxxC03e0A219xxOup5vRAREbR7PkR6Ut61tAXP8ATjG0 UwO1RXg7Oe5SC4D6aBKnU60u0uzidIN4q9dlAPDEdcbt8C9I2aORHTIBk5qs2VTRF/1P W9zg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.131.164 with SMTP id on4mr206359210qeb.16.1389150980265; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.58.101 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:16:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:16:20 +0800 Message-ID: From: "Cao,Zhen" To: Hui Deng Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: MIF Mailing List Subject: Re: [mif] Call for WG adoption X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 03:16:31 -0000 Hello all, I am support of adoption. It is a good architectural work and contains guidance to help stack cope with multiple provision domains. Thanks, -zhen On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Hui Deng wrote: > Hello all, > > Please express your opinion whether you would like to have below draft > adopted as the WG document? > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt > > Thanks, > > -cochairs of WG > > _______________________________________________ > mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif > From swmike@swm.pp.se Wed Jan 8 00:52:20 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475DE1AE04B for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:52:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.789 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CUanLGK6Aec for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC0F1AE02F for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 00:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id AF6609C; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:52:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92339A; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:52:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:52:07 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: "Cao,Zhen" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References:

User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: MIF Mailing List Subject: Re: [mif] Call for WG adoption X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:52:20 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Cao,Zhen wrote: > Hello all, > > I am support of adoption. It is a good architectural work and contains > guidance to help stack cope with multiple provision domains. I have read through this document today and I support adoption. It's valuable and further work should be done as WG document. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se From lorenzo@google.com Thu Jan 9 02:35:18 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157381AE234 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:35:18 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.916 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CSEGytW78tTB for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:35:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5650B1AE1B2 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:35:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id u16so865151iet.18 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:35:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lFGZ/WD/sYCy7/hXNRnjkUzLyYG1DgXBFsmV+HlgB9M=; b=eD+bhA0UQfO8D96Sy8DD6LeYZeIzqG0MqFrw/8P4EY7eiTX2A/ZjDH6FR5iE4LF8wf EaczkLJnU0jo9cS7Y3yXRIJpQoWfAo/UoshE+m+a78RSBZfZxCUTojKoTDTKYoYmYyGQ Afc3j2dKB0BgWErMMPM5H1SNDYwe+suI/BWn2nXomJ/y4gjPxv3b2A+HhFR9ReHZbVJA m86cFvgwx9lNAeawWjKmKObPGUkmyOzaHKsWTpor2FTKFGSBkB8LUFDI9P8B4WuXnpup LP1SRkXFvcmI8lxFJYLUqVzErciOsbDqUuGzmr7bh0slCpmydSjIm+VdqLYkFVTmE0nK qRfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lFGZ/WD/sYCy7/hXNRnjkUzLyYG1DgXBFsmV+HlgB9M=; b=kTX4HyFE1FMFrwGB0h68t1M0QIg8B/FHhogQjySg5A67UzSw9qkCwmipbkUX8RK63I bDvbcF4G9Rd8YvGu0M7fEnD+/sEH8QOwHTYZwpXIheTeNscCwTLrsZSBaDL/v1/w1vg/ JuF33A66NBZP1D/TvEd7ZSmDzcb8I70O/yed+tcg0WQ/n4FedtB0lqwePuIapfRnmFdj Lj2+BixqPUIquYr9Yf53Wu0yvjaqSe/Vhkq5wD6HdgTzNt85lvd3xo6yJHnUPSnNFpX7 wQTu89H2ZU7gbSB3wGTbkHw6WxWiQ60qm2fQ5h/Nk6ULL5KRCWbOdgT5pnzVq2Z2JLTp a2Mw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJY8CsO1FvkFlS0rmpnV8CHD1b3hHOgTkOey35nil5qxej+ItZjneYaZ35FRMBGNscDXXWFOxyQzMuErzk2UiVEKAawksn2hPP5aX0Qb6j9o9/bfLPCfLcyr6OzNfCOzBWmmKaUfdSdgRvGRge9lqAv8K1FhDa4n1OwTX16Nr2hdb6YpcXvehBsdHaCD4bqyRQI3Ot X-Received: by 10.43.51.65 with SMTP id vh1mr1737371icb.24.1389263706662; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:35:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:34:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lorenzo Colitti Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 19:34:46 +0900 Message-ID: To: Hui Deng Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec5299ad7bc4b3304ef8729d3 Cc: MIF Mailing List Subject: Re: [mif] Call for WG adoption X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:35:18 -0000 --bcaec5299ad7bc4b3304ef8729d3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Hui Deng wrote: > Please express your opinion whether you would like to have below draft > adopted as the WG document? > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt > This is outstanding work. I strongly support adoption. Regards, Lorenzo --bcaec5299ad7bc4b3304ef8729d3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On T= ue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>= wrote:

Please express your op= inion whether you would like to have below draft adopted=C2=A0as the WG doc= ument?

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05= .txt

This is outstanding wo= rk. I strongly support adoption.

Regards,

Lorenzo

--bcaec5299ad7bc4b3304ef8729d3-- From alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com Mon Jan 13 06:51:33 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32851AE09F for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:51:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.983 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uz_nJUSRmJ0V for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757591AE1BB for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id s0DEpJHj026043 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:51:19 +0100 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E74E4207866 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:52:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49D8207842 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:52:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id s0DEpAAF011506 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:51:19 +0100 Message-ID: <52D3FD5E.7070702@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:51:10 +0100 From: Alexandru Petrescu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mif@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [mif] Call for WG adoption X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:51:33 -0000 I support adoption. Nit: "ortunneling" should split. Architecturally speaking, I wonder whether the semantics of querying the obtention of a PVD based on an IP address is described. Let me explain why. We are considering locally the expression of an energy metric in a PVD. This would for example be sent by the network to the mobile telling it that one of its interfaces is that much energy-hungry. But the other way around should also be possible: a mobile may request an interface to the network how many Joules are needed to reach a particular IP destination. For that to work, there would be need for the mobile to query the network using an IP address as key, and obtaining a particular PVD. This is akin to the option of sending an Neighbor Solicitation for a particular Target address. I had a look at the section 2.4 "PVD Identifying/Naming" but I could not find an indication that would consider that a PVD Identifier be an IP address. Alex Le 07/01/2014 06:44, Hui Deng a �crit : > Hello all, Please express your opinion whether you would like to have > below draft adopted as the WG document? > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt Thanks, > -cochairs of WG > > > _______________________________________________ mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif > From denghui02@gmail.com Thu Jan 23 05:55:11 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9271A045B for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.749 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jjZH3sT7y6V for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E01A043A for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id pa12so1116652veb.30 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uNG3xmEGg9BFMytfSo5CdSOWqSljb3hO71Wa7th47yU=; b=N+UB8SLbu/ftUXFxT0TdXpl3uSyY5iU3rF4pY5h/uZtNC9rg1FLn3w8bCJu/sqRcjx uNzR5EaSwz3k5oB8vxMPQgd8fftBEmlO9ZQwr3Pie46SgYH30279CiRZowWKIIgyLaUZ mrb869OhOWMbT4/PHBoiFkYJx2baxWfiLhVOcWp6DV2Pl/4Eja+NW7kU55w5AzRN1qfS ZiAhp915/on98yWQ278dhIskLG6uoktskXupHK8X6SmqHgMW9OUKmwyRnMWwU3r6deNn BsyQ0YcOQOecXe18R+I95VIOp/oMAxe4P70tTd8tu06epUyt1vZI7dWZa8S6D6cPescj j8hA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.17.134 with SMTP id qc6mr2525vcb.47.1390485306130; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.75.2 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:55:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52D3FD5E.7070702@gmail.com> References: <52D3FD5E.7070702@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:55:06 +0800 Message-ID: From: Hui Deng To: Alexandru Petrescu Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133839cbcf02e04f0a39653 Cc: MIF Mailing List Subject: Re: [mif] Call for WG adoption X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:55:11 -0000 --001a1133839cbcf02e04f0a39653 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, I saw the support from the mailing list, plus design team's support, so the concensus has been achieved, please authors help to submit the draft with working group name. thanks a lot -Hui 2014/1/13 Alexandru Petrescu > I support adoption. > > Nit: "ortunneling" should split. > > Architecturally speaking, I wonder whether the semantics of querying > the obtention of a PVD based on an IP address is described. > > Let me explain why. > > We are considering locally the expression of an energy metric in a PVD. > This would for example be sent by the network to the mobile telling it > that one of its interfaces is that much energy-hungry. > > But the other way around should also be possible: a mobile may request > an interface to the network how many Joules are needed to reach a > particular IP destination. > > For that to work, there would be need for the mobile to query the > network using an IP address as key, and obtaining a particular PVD. > This is akin to the option of sending an Neighbor Solicitation for a > particular Target address. > > I had a look at the section 2.4 "PVD Identifying/Naming" but I could not > find an indication that would consider that a PVD Identifier be an IP > address. > > Alex > > > Le 07/01/2014 06:44, Hui Deng a =E9crit : > >> Hello all, Please express your opinion whether you would like to have >> below draft adopted as the WG document? >> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt Thanks, >> -cochairs of WG >> >> >> _______________________________________________ mif mailing list >> mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif > --001a1133839cbcf02e04f0a39653 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

I saw the support from the m= ailing list, =A0plus design team's support, so the concensus has been a= chieved,

please authors help to submit the draft with working gro= up name.

thanks a lot

-Hui

<= div class=3D"gmail_extra">

2014/1/13 Alex= andru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>

I support adoption.

Nit: "ortunneling" should split.

Architecturally =A0speaking, I wonder whether the semantics of querying
the obtention of a PVD based on an IP address is described.

Let me explain why.

We are considering locally the expression of an energy metric in a PVD.
=A0This would for example be sent by the network to the mobile telling it that one of its interfaces is that much energy-hungry.

But the other way around should also be possible: a mobile may request
an interface to the network how many Joules are needed to reach a
particular IP destination.

For that to work, there would be need for the mobile to query the
network using an IP address as key, and obtaining a particular PVD.
This is akin to the option of sending an Neighbor Solicitation for a
particular Target address.

I had a look at the section 2.4 "PVD Identifying/Naming" but I co= uld not
find an indication that would consider that a PVD Identifier be an IP
address.

Alex

Le 07/01/2014 06:44, Hui Deng a =E9crit :

Hello all, Please express your opinion whether you would like to have
below draft adopted as the WG document?
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt= Thanks,
-cochairs of WG

_______________________________________________ mif mailing list
mif@ietf.org https://ww= w.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
mif@ietf.org
htt= ps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

--001a1133839cbcf02e04f0a39653--