From seal_sum@yahoo.co.in  Fri Jun 12 02:45:27 2009
Return-Path: <seal_sum@yahoo.co.in>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F1F3A6B31 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:45:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rntp9m3YxIsl for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web8504.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8504.mail.in.yahoo.com [202.43.219.166]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C578F3A67CC for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:45:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 62684 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jun 2009 09:45:29 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1244799929; bh=4HfjwVkaMOL3c2/smh+agVk6aTvZydCVwIl8WmyAnPU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JGlA6XHh7sGpkU+Bcm/1gyUX+VjZWDbz0mbgnXY44eenYu2xPzJBoJDeNlOAOa1t8VWJLVzOoUZlQSZuxJfqq/vcQbHpoBOY5RvcWMqQD0NkfYY3MhpkE7JjSRWKzRFxne3oU//rEJgrZa8QgOwQhKrmr365s9vUV1YFS04f7qc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VdeZDlv2aKZD2+sjWdKP3Kc02jtJV/7QyAFKayxsZXx5PiSmXryAVICoHUYxc/jojZuPHwLuMBP72FjRHMRzwFJ2wCGtTzkdBthO2/K9cS8vF1PZeGB+sxIkx2va0L9O8zDjcHfvH6PmzG9A5kL8E3kMm8JhHeMV2nA4OK6VnKU=;
Message-ID: <425831.62155.qm@web8504.mail.in.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: DnTs.5QVM1l_FnVue_oDAN5mrap3SZZVqhpXdn.eXjjggEtPGk92hyfyurCLHd0jSRl0f1p.cjBihl.AyKBMS97Eznw9axPwR_neQN_8IV7IHiYx5ilMOaIZhTuq2kKCG_OM3AGAMus7yfSaBq241n3nYcTz5pRBMTlzwEKvEdtdEVGW.fWToCqzztDWeUFPQwfikYoMuCwY2d71.4jEQ1I2WQXW6w--
Received: from [121.243.14.254] by web8504.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:15:29 IST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.12 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:15:29 +0530 (IST)
From: Sumanta Seal <seal_sum@yahoo.co.in>
To: isis-wg@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-248019892-1244799929=:62155"
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] RFC 5306 on Restart Signaling for IS-IS
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:45:27 -0000

--0-248019892-1244799929=:62155
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

The new RFC 5306 obsoletes the existing one for ISIS GR=0A(3847). But this =
new RFC does not includes any update or modification=0Aor correction over t=
he existing one. I am wondering why this new RFC=0Awas introduced obsoletin=
g the old one. Can anybody please let me know=0Athe reason behind it.

Thanks,
Sumanta=0A=0A=0A      Bollywood news, movie reviews, film trailers and more=
! Go to http://in.movies.yahoo.com/
--0-248019892-1244799929=:62155
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;">Hi all,<br><div><br>The new RFC 5306 obsolete=
s the existing one for ISIS GR=0A(3847). But this new RFC does not includes=
 any update or modification=0Aor correction over the existing one. I am won=
dering why this new RFC=0Awas introduced obsoleting the old one. Can anybod=
y please let me know=0Athe reason behind it.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Sumanta</div=
></td></tr></table><br>=0A=0A=0A      <!--1--><hr size=3D1></hr> Cricket on=
 your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. <a href=3D"http://in.rd.yah=
oo.com/tagline_cricket_1/*http://beta.cricket.yahoo.com"> Enter now!</a>
--0-248019892-1244799929=:62155--

From mshand@cisco.com  Fri Jun 12 03:21:37 2009
Return-Path: <mshand@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231AE3A6BE3 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eNSSTz89SyIt for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D1F3A68CC for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:21:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,209,1243814400"; d="scan'208";a="42654823"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2009 10:21:41 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5CALfP0011891;  Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:21:41 +0200
Received: from [10.61.103.81] (dhcp-10-61-103-81.cisco.com [10.61.103.81]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5CALeeD007138; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:21:41 GMT
Message-ID: <4A322C30.8010905@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:21:36 +0100
From: mike shand <mshand@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sumanta Seal <seal_sum@yahoo.co.in>
References: <425831.62155.qm@web8504.mail.in.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <425831.62155.qm@web8504.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1281; t=1244802101; x=1245666101; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshand@cisco.com; z=From:=20mike=20shand=20<mshand@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[Isis-wg]=20RFC=205306=20on=20Restart=2 0Signaling=20for=20IS-IS |Sender:=20; bh=QkUAf66XlRjpXnlLqtG5bXkUPMyZCElXQZDgrVP5+5M=; b=nUG6BNcH/3pDvZFhs56Fjma8CE6k19eRA5Nh82deivp5BHG5mn7ARjomDY zNrxNq2jAdhbfcU6WIRE10wUYIZrlr7hXto0+xkAZ1rONtWeZYoiRD60iynO xYD3I0QIvH;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=mshand@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; ); 
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] RFC 5306 on Restart Signaling for IS-IS
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:21:37 -0000

It is purely procedural. The old one was "informational", whereas the 
new one is "standards track". Since the IS-IS protocol is technically 
"owned" by ISO, any IETF work on IS-IS could only be informational. 
However, following an agreement with ISO, IP related IS-IS work can now 
become standards track. Hence the change of status, which required the 
issuance of a new RFC.

Similar changes have been made to other IS-IS RFCs.

    Mike

Sumanta Seal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The new RFC 5306 obsoletes the existing one for ISIS GR (3847). But 
> this new RFC does not includes any update or modification or 
> correction over the existing one. I am wondering why this new RFC was 
> introduced obsoleting the old one. Can anybody please let me know the 
> reason behind it.
>
> Thanks,
> Sumanta
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cricket on your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter now! 
> <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_cricket_1/*http://beta.cricket.yahoo.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>   


From seal_sum@yahoo.co.in  Mon Jun 15 02:40:14 2009
Return-Path: <seal_sum@yahoo.co.in>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27CF3A6931 for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDhGiBnLSfMU for <isis-wg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web8506.mail.in.yahoo.com (web8506.mail.in.yahoo.com [202.43.219.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 082F03A680E for <isis-wg@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 69481 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Jun 2009 09:40:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1245058801; bh=rnpHoHfp+flSQpQ0nRZo/rQIyrnMOftOUBsiex1+DnE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AlfT4yJBOybl8WzFpJH6bJOlfYVHKj7W4WU8lZkFpOr6iWoqbr3gWSybVVrXXRWCYje29KUeX3Tq0pZMfZGNVHR80l/5OvOr4LtLPRx0I6QLO7WLCW13KGXuTtxDxcmSldR+Tgxhxw3Uu95y0UaOZ+cZTwbvJL0eU90ir0H9BsA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dV8C5nW5Glaf3Mko9WJH1ejsiqOzflA+EjutAeJdENd9DpY7w1qfJ0+6blllB/vZg1pUrp9QpH52aqWdkTPJEYLEEZyv0R2/Jf3SBzi51/Y9cQxzmdLNk1PyWmIlziplnXWqoYFfQB+geyTH9b10mLGd6H0x9cnufIFf1qgb2J4=;
Message-ID: <971799.69301.qm@web8506.mail.in.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: uLrBFQsVM1l592e5aQ.UkyiqyUe1_9whi1T9xzS2atI93BUuJVpPzsyWE5WwbOj7TS.FsAEZ2m9Lz.q5L9jjKxjZ9qsSxMV0VJDMfUuWkWquD0lFVAY5ljja4a5dQP8njTTug9E2IFph78PJJMy2sd5evy69ZLjz71lS9GY9Eaeexen3mojDAB0Gijr8U_fmybIBDpAYp3MvR0BSG6h9C8zBOqFQ7Q--
Received: from [121.243.14.254] by web8506.mail.in.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:10:01 IST
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.4.12 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:10:01 +0530 (IST)
From: Sumanta Seal <seal_sum@yahoo.co.in>
To: mike shand <mshand@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-972738387-1245058801=:69301"
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] RFC 5306 on Restart Signaling for IS-IS
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isis-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:40:14 -0000

--0-972738387-1245058801=:69301
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Thanks Mike.

... Sumanta



--- On Fri, 12/6/09, mike shand <mshand@cisco.com> wrote:

From: mike shand <mshand@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] RFC 5306 on Restart Signaling for IS-IS
To: "Sumanta Seal" <seal_sum@yahoo.co.in>
Cc: isis-wg@ietf.org
Date: Friday, 12 June, 2009, 3:51 PM

It is purely procedural. The old one was "informational", whereas the new o=
ne is "standards track". Since the IS-IS protocol is technically "owned" by=
 ISO, any IETF work on IS-IS could only be informational. However, followin=
g an agreement with ISO, IP related IS-IS work can now become standards tra=
ck. Hence the change of status, which required the issuance of a new RFC.

Similar changes have been made to other IS-IS RFCs.

=A0=A0=A0Mike

Sumanta Seal wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> The new RFC 5306 obsoletes the existing one for ISIS GR (3847). But this =
new RFC does not includes any update or modification or correction over the=
 existing one. I am wondering why this new RFC was introduced obsoleting th=
e old one. Can anybody please let me know the reason behind it.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Sumanta
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cricket on your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter now! <htt=
p://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_cricket_1/*http://beta.cricket.yahoo.com>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Isis-wg mailing list
> Isis-wg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg
>=A0=A0=A0

=0A=0A=0A      Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yah=
oo! India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/
--0-972738387-1245058801=:69301
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<table cellspacing=3D"0" cellpadding=3D"0" border=3D"0" ><tr><td valign=3D"=
top" style=3D"font: inherit;"><br>Thanks Mike.<br><br>... Sumanta<br><div><=
br></div><br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 12/6/09, mike shand <i>&lt;mshand@cisco.com=
&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, =
16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: mike shand &lt;ms=
hand@cisco.com&gt;<br>Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] RFC 5306 on Restart Signaling =
for IS-IS<br>To: "Sumanta Seal" &lt;seal_sum@yahoo.co.in&gt;<br>Cc: isis-wg=
@ietf.org<br>Date: Friday, 12 June, 2009, 3:51 PM<br><br><div class=3D"plai=
nMail">It is purely procedural. The old one was "informational", whereas th=
e new one is "standards track". Since the IS-IS protocol is technically "ow=
ned" by ISO, any IETF work on IS-IS could only be informational. However, f=
ollowing an agreement with ISO, IP related IS-IS work can now become standa=
rds track. Hence the change of status, which required the issuance of a new
 RFC.<br><br>Similar changes have been made to other IS-IS RFCs.<br><br>&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Mike<br><br>Sumanta Seal wrote:<br>&gt; Hi all,<br>&gt; <br>=
&gt; The new RFC 5306 obsoletes the existing one for ISIS GR (3847). But th=
is new RFC does not includes any update or modification or correction over =
the existing one. I am wondering why this new RFC was introduced obsoleting=
 the old one. Can anybody please let me know the reason behind it.<br>&gt; =
<br>&gt; Thanks,<br>&gt; Sumanta<br>&gt; <br>&gt; <br>&gt; ----------------=
--------------------------------------------------------<br>&gt; Cricket on=
 your mind? Visit the ultimate cricket website. Enter now! &lt;<a href=3D"h=
ttp://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_cricket_1/*http://beta.cricket.yahoo.com" tar=
get=3D"_blank">http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_cricket_1/*http://beta.cricke=
t.yahoo.com</a>&gt;<br>&gt; -----------------------------------------------=
-------------------------<br>&gt; <br>&gt;
 _______________________________________________<br>&gt; Isis-wg mailing li=
st<br>&gt; <a ymailto=3D"mailto:Isis-wg@ietf.org" href=3D"/mc/compose?to=3D=
Isis-wg@ietf.org">Isis-wg@ietf.org</a><br>&gt; <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.=
org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg" target=3D"_blank">https://www.ietf.org/mailma=
n/listinfo/isis-wg</a><br>&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br></div></blockquote>=
</td></tr></table><br>=0A      <!--8--><hr size=3D1></hr> Share files, take=
 polls, and make new friends - all under one roof. <a href=3D"http://in.rd.=
yahoo.com/tagline_groups_8/*http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/"> Click here=
.</a>
--0-972738387-1245058801=:69301--