Software

From Jdooi@optonline.net Thu Dec 01 05:52:49 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehm3V-0001xb-Q4; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:52:49 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA20842; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:52:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhmNy-0000FH-Ak; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:13:58 -0500 Received: from corp-200-105-230-200-uio.punto.net.ec ([200.105.230.200] helo=lh) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ehm3S-0001WH-2Y; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:52:46 -0500 From: "Pierre Cahill" To: isis-update@ietf.org Subject: Re: Important question Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 07:43:40 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_TNMHGFDT.QPLSXHSR" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 4.0 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_TNMHGFDT.QPLSXHSR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your present circumstances has been assessed to the compulsory parties, and upon wise contemplation, we are able to suggest to you the subsequent prospect. Based upon wise contemplation you make the grade to acheive a openhanded revenue on your first property investment. By completing the subsequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to finalize our estimation, and we feel firm you will acheive not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will accomplish all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to finalize this part of the contract. With kindest regards, Pierre Cahill Should you prefer not to benefit of this holiday prospect you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_TNMHGFDT.QPLSXHSR Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your present circumstances has been assessed to the compulsory parties, and upon wise contemplation, we are able to suggest to you the subsequent prospect.

Based upon wise contemplation you make the grade to acheive a openhanded revenue on your first property investment.

By completing the subsequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to finalize our estimation, and we feel firm you will acheive not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will accomplish all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to finalize this part of the contract.

With kindest regards,

Pierre Cahill

Should you prefer not to benefit of this holiday prospect you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_TNMHGFDT.QPLSXHSR-- From Aovaivi@optonline.net Thu Dec 01 06:16:45 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhmQf-0000fl-FR; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:16:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA25161; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:15:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ehml7-0000wm-QL; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:37:55 -0500 Received: from [219.145.182.217] (helo=lh) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EhmQc-0002D0-9Q; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 06:16:43 -0500 From: "Cathy Donahue" To: ipsec@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Please Read Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 05:16:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_TUPMRODB.PZFHEEBH" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_TUPMRODB.PZFHEEBH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your current position has been discussed to the required peoples, and upon fastidious consideration, we are able to extend to you the ensuing prospect. Based upon fastidious consideration you make the grade to be given a sizable revenue on your initial property investment. By completing the ensuing attached form in a timely manner we will be able to decide our appraisal, and we feel assured you will be given not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will carry out all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to decide this part of the settlement. With kind regards, Cathy Donahue Should you prefer not to take advantage of this holiday prospect you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_TUPMRODB.PZFHEEBH Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your current position has been discussed to the required peoples, and upon fastidious consideration, we are able to extend to you the ensuing prospect.

Based upon fastidious consideration you make the grade to be given a sizable revenue on your initial property investment.

By completing the ensuing attached form in a timely manner we will be able to decide our appraisal, and we feel assured you will be given not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will carry out all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to decide this part of the settlement.

With kind regards,

Cathy Donahue

Should you prefer not to take advantage of this holiday prospect you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_TUPMRODB.PZFHEEBH-- From steuber@jocoks.com Thu Dec 01 08:54:47 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehotb-00055X-Al; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:54:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA22681; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:53:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from cp575775-a.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([84.24.21.250]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhpDw-0006EQ-Pt; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:15:55 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.1] ([84.24.21.250]) by yahoo.com (Sendmail 8.7.0) with ESMTP (SSL) id IYT63122 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 07:53:55 -0600 Message-ID: <644e743n.8518548@yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=exemplary; d=yahoo.com; b=Vhtj8lc2WEa2JD8KpYmMHXtHTmtcnGV1UCIEaoRBIyttsiyhKPXHfiHtJjKr3qkdBBIkAfUZJfHUkqUY; X-Display: Full X-List: codicil.usenet Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 07:53:55 -0600 From: "Randall Hilton" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: in@ietf.org Cc: ing@ietf.org, ing-admin@ietf.org, internet-drafts@ietf.org, internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org, ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org Subject: Notification: Loww ratess Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------AttPart_18790729==.OLA" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Scan-Signature: ee80a2074afbfe28d15369f4e74e579d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AttPart_18790729==.OLA Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
it sluice ! rail a navel be medley it's chablis it's implosion in seaweed and contention a guile some garble some three see jutish or austin but probate Or maybe not

--------------AttPart_18790729==.OLA Content-Type: image/gif; name="corps.3.gif" Content-ID: <4.0.0.89.0.54435562022894.90440735@electron.msn.com.8> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="corps.3.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhtgHYAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZzJmZmZlmzGZm zGZmZmYzzDMzMzMAzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAAC2AdgAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8Tq/b7/gf5ECCLFQLEAB+eYWG h1V7fX8pgYOMiJGSk0OKI4SNgpiUnJ2eM5YimAcQEhKWjpiBpqGfrq+cpaazfwcSDiILEnyp f7qMDruww8SGrYQQuCOOvQASkAAOysXU1XDHf7KzpgC9tnzLgtbj5GjYjyfNzyTS5e7vYOe/ IqS+mr7r0cLo8P3+UucAkKKV616uWZZs/VvIkI0DaA0jSpxIsaLFixgzatzIsaPHjyBDihxJ suQ4XSRu/41o52ITvXwuFkzz4TKGo0Ezy9wkoevAzioscdQUsu+GA3Epiu74CWSfLqRDU9S0 BXGFzCBRY4pLloZpt11epQS9kfWH0hpHV5zNEbYHJmn71kqtKuMqkLIs2upEakLvk7E28PaQ axYcD786WO4ihJKerFYCEdoKFgycLlaGL5sCLCIYZnqeYT6bhcsWq4Okp4VWpK1eNwiPDa92 +ZPQgdCMFK7M+TX1t5eQwML+rPDmQFN0j99CuupUWoGPk2urHG048hG3CUZm58D0Ke4p+RxX xdfPZJUjnMaONg32bp6CAq3XrCy0skDB8H3Wt661EJSkdIPLc5MdZNgltVwnzP881R3ESCm8 wQbOcxJCp8x1rvHDIISiWPLcTYydwos4R4l33SIvdSgeV7p1ltOGKr2FHjMiNljcVuJkiN2M 33314HcF+lgCKTmawkcwOXI1iCKklCYBePzsGE5k961T2wKmQbRgPpW1aKQIML32lSI77VOi hb3xwqUg3wQo5hDftKOQkkoWZIJt+QgT5kPOHFinnSY89xIfMLGEiVJctQWiPeB809OOEN3U jqCRHdAieyUgistNo4nC6KA3NiglilM6A417fza2El+/URonq7tcamhVmCAzE0pXUmWCntC0 w5g0+JTATEJxqemnT3H1+keYiOnwjCV+5KPNNncmCE7/rNtI9iRPOXGGKYpFzbodt9/2tZU9 O/rEV5TpWSoMYOZt6yIJlwoIJpb36PYTtmKGts2x9LIpr50u/baSlkfmtAu8WA4srrDxnUuv cIsYHJ7FYvbiCJ/wvVkpmGpm+4xxIgNZocdCHCWvygiygOe1hB6Y3qndrtsZrDG/x4+moprr qceODqxrCcCSiLPFNfHMHp8ysbSvu/3yVgJt4iCqya0D9/yxqwsfXVStdPlRK9ZfXbwWr1B2 aupZw6YLctk+v41CY82yhd6Yy+SjY8sGv4vKlj/mROSEODp2oWzKyBg4dB6KsyjQwlSYpQmm GeYemksaSLS06FUOpnpmixkk/5HC8mg0OKUIXCVEthT5bo9Ndmi47F+hTtcqO65OpewYv80g dfrU12PHO/WNuodP7nRm7TQCCmeYd0On3dTWyq3ZJprdwlt2+ykXHOI/o7aZMtzX+CZjSBk8 W9isagPJeLdvE9TlmTvfZ6jSb3aCcoJezxL8+5uO39yHHQI6hhWQyEr0AHjAGvWuT+ILBYOG Rrz0FWslkkHZ9X6Uj7qZhAVhahke/pSFB37QHaOjX8fmQD/gbcFbJ0ThdGQWvjmshoZYIEwM d8jDHvrwh0AMohCHSMQixkEwT0BiXwqlw5bYDCtPhIIKYzDFFlRxIFE0wqOKsMUZdBELSmxC GDNVJP+pUTGLNEGjGNWogiq6zGZPocsRvvifJlrFjlKUI0D0CIj+4PGNR3CjFNkoFUJODY5/ rCMOf0BHGDTSWZqxlCwg0Rwm3eKSp3kNKwgkQMs8hpPT200pJEkabGXyeou8xCXfd0MwTYOO qZtFZrZRCiGJYlsbPIF19IfB/eRPNNqADH+Q0sr6eY8n8ouMLH85E39N8XqdyaA+Ujek6QAH g2PiRt4mlMEtMmgex7xljELZOiMppxTZIAj/cHCdp6jJQdF0l7QYASM2Xc5z9aTd3qbJuJfs QxVrWoFpyuMcWRDqlWf5pDYvAxdtwk4lDPUMrcbHoWk21ETaq2hqhveS4fz/AUkXzZxppFFR z5BUJSrrziAK2iOQemZdA+GTSSU6zAMNVGUCg0QwekOb12kPOUGipj7kedJNnWKUq1DpjoCa OpVZCUJ8aKpQa3A30RCqV92ByaFOJQiuXbUPXYUV0Yw2Mdvdix18HCoGEYqLu8GSR4QiFi79 SKh9kG5qWgXL8AqETlXWFRhZa103kGVBXKAqr+7iC5ZoR5m8LeApeUOkmizYVY7eMoHPoOBO 3Vk6wu5IE0/yTlxXillkDUhzE3sdZun5OoSmVS2GsSrGAoG0BEEsGgir18ZKdiCWcKxdP/MO Le8om6x9x60JZU5mmSUvEalEuP86JDIfWzLQimxZ/6rJ2kohWt3MTYsWDLoTiUr2EKstUU29 etJOxTuxhuk0eWvpSXj14aNfjMyP1z0Oa2U2tPXOTHP+Io0NikLgr+6mtnKTnVcheImumlFn C95ZKucWrqIUaHgupF1kGjaTWkZzlJFJhjRGLN5ZUlfEI07niEd8UGya674oBpZ3tbdiZMnx cpRZ8UPCe1dkorcP6tXuSqcbpCE3Ur5h8vBRNTGcW+pYqZcx1pC4ZOEOtlbHr1VBgYH7O2xZ DhjQAtJD/YY6MZNviv8bs1mrY5kt4bCLnB1IOhOkXfrpqqKyWGp7rByhGl0mxID9aOcudzf/ GugXrQt05hrbz5HCs35xBv8xhqa6TWXWgkOGxiCZvvQlyB7ZlJdGD00ZGs0zh1WtdBxanE/0 qEgnEgVbtl4GERzB/3Wy1mcWMNGmwb9/UhIh+02HUrLXuWzRyoKhzhY7LPzdiWarzbQsczKd kd3SLZPYrNlKtsh3XQ0H2JLZkqw/ERJNFDRbfJ2OrzCga8F1f0mcAvYXaiHVy20Emz/SzAIJ XfbgJdyGcizetVKFxcrMpHgmPukLidPRNM6kWFgB7wwltyeN3so4FxOvuMBvBY3baJw7wKrK bSz+W7ukY+HYQfnIAQ5yiJQ8UhEXEK+lNnCBHLxRCI85FVpoR55P2IhAt2G+VVDMoBv96EhP utL/l870pjudi69+utTb8MipW/3qWGe6QqgSSpTZxoDMjBySSJ31sgNh61/q3Si2dc+vuy6q KunPz81O9xig/cu3xRTXtPYbOhmy7oBvAdpJZbYj8fa3bxtFXwPPeBoMXoTckRTNccYuCjb+ 8oIP7cCG4rndNVrN6CCFu7JROGpj/vTbuVRUVLjOBl4yqoBFz+UI3W/U2556t889FTyo+95X Isu+D77wh0/84hv/+MgXAwxJYsKQ/GT5SIiKm24QdRyMh4bKPVFNKSeLV04yb+YLWAgZeTW5 6evvXtQ1T3LT/XBoP481ZAf6k8CxeolROjmoPllGXBO6bZr0UWUzJuMk//iAD4YnM6oyBKlw OCmCMj1gX15xKPZEgLYEf+yyKiUUOcBHBNI3f7A2dzzwDJxhGjVUIgQGDcWzMN5nKpfwIh5I A0xhV7j0glrxQPkBOR5XKhYYFZRiBYHwE5W0Zh+zOb5kHw04L4pHGjZTPt7UTepXb9xGKkb4 Gje4KvuWDEJWNFAyLzOzCd9QFECoTtHhIiBWQKVkeCGkMRuFHMaxHtynhLcEGeeBgLDxUTPx LO/DNvIjOKMhIpcRClO4NvrjHVfzGBioBWVoS9ThhclFODezIgIDHnhSJTZzOVGmiEixFmdy V2v3iGhyiZvTChWnXY7CF2PxJ9GShwmYgG8SJP/zgCTV9HZtsi7NwGDn53mpZjoZs4QVNSi2 sggwMVucw4eRUyE4xiSEtg4ZUis9oiQ96IN8sSeGlYcHEhZfFC+SmA0ouC6U8ih7wgh66Ce2 hQ7XiCyLlFKgUmfoojOi0GE8pjYHkXepol42s2DjJyaH0igziBMrBHkZo0Ot4yHTyI8IEoxK oTT0NoTFgSjLolOJ8yDMQVZakILVaBCDsoX96CKyMpAFsy4kZErhlmD28y3Y2BvGphejCHvj IkLP10x3+IPpAoa0KDHp4nAIwzh0KGENmAolMzU25TjhV1Zp8ThjgYduc4S5wIejsh1M0Q7h 8pA1pBvPWAX7glXlwor/U3mNDYN3v6iDN+NjDLYrCMiQBQFQ6ZBFviIT3RYlFsMsFpSDdqJV LtiOyFQuh3iR8dgx+biTFjkXGTmVpQhdp0CRQRGDfqKUR7iQ4hiWD8OIXxCGgPVjsRMwjeOJ nAiUKumKlqWZZIZamoiMBAVW3OSA0NE0PWEYLVITxpiJoxU7uqIrrcY2ZQRPI6hmzaOX4KiP djJB/aeLMsWNWdUki+kME7hhxrlsizMxSymVoJlgjZmHGoYFTIFK4Bc9KZdvgchASbgZvHiG EfQ9JxCISUmEfraERdeA3zVe5tOGvKRJMPGHNFQ8Y2iXZrgZkfN++JibfOl60gGHWCQzTmWd //xwHN6Hn+gGGC2SoCujfk8ZPo5ZPxthf2JRezAgTO/QfMknbOxHoUwAfSKBoRn6Yu0ZoiRa oiZ6oiiaoiq6oiw6AgRQADBKAAEgAwJQAERAAAQAADUqACJQAAPQRk9IRRtIEwhkAgEAo0hK ADxKBD7aoz/qA03qpOwEgjswRmeHTlMJA9MnBDg6AC+aozFQozeaozX6pFFqbgkypIRHf5tm pAVAAAPgpTD6pEIQpWfKA2d6pzSgf4Ghpj7QGFn6AlsaBDgqAoUapjY6BIUaAAMwowCgp7h3 gS9gpSHIWm66pAAQAC+KqUCgpFIKpXQKqTLApzVAqX9KgwFUBIVao/9gmqkvGqMF4Kg1mqSJ WgKamqQzyqow6qpIyqkDgKRvmqNHKgCzuqtoWjvVqT0bph1fl1WUwYhRVXTrZDHKczIkMKzX GqW3Oqck8KsxKqvfCgBfGq46GgDFWqsicKSvWgDE2qsjcK4vqqPAeq7puq5L+qtf+oHRxEvz Q0wuCWLrQ4gRxE3jxz+q81xuWJ2PtQdvUSW+ZLBTphnvM58usK7smq5zKqexKq8+6q3oirFv Gqcwaq4xKgBH2rEv+qT4KrJvmqnsyqghKxXk9mgc4jl9t7AYpY1us3jgNGgDMg3u9mDYSgKL GqNyCqYr660zOqct+6pwaqzpurK2iqQe+7T/GzurLGujMAunW/ujJxunKQsA3iqj+rqJ7uEl ybJsOLIi8/RoaTGLU0aJloaLsmknpei2s4k3qWUiJqI7FQun3sqjL+qot7q0ZOuyHyuuF5uu PMqqM7qpLhqrrPquLTu0oipChHaYQ4gOsIFsUSl2eik1t4isnDG0LpqjkGuo7Dq5GPujb2qu jxulNeqoIwCpJ5urLSuvPPq6IFu7ofqkqau4W6tl5ogiv8I0WfMhQgM2Z3UwLFgtHTM0qTKT gLIK16Is7MIUCDaPL3CoR/qjcJqtAWC68moCh1oCs6u6wAqj7Uq74iqsi3u5NbRcELeSnGtn vrazNvUkWYEM7xWU/xjLqY+Kuq3qsu26vi07q2B6vulLAra7uEM7rOQrpp/6qMCLwOz6q7DV lJtyDxvjcvfhkQ9CZyE5OD4ZMEP4XdpUKjuhJIL5HR05ZcbbcYl0vk1bwLP7vUSbuPFqAg2c snEaxCSLqZoKv0sqv1GyDjyjetpIMhOCUHQ5JftWEBKKAhPcpD0sAjvKqkEcp0t6q+Dbqg3s u5cawAGsw5FLxp8KxF0MsxtMlmtzL2fhNMs7wiJZOpFqt/kLCI5DIkehn3dyKzC1edlANn+r uj+Kr7i7sWGruImryLwqr476q09axD16sbdqxBWcUD8STYvDxOQoMG12aYlDZQlyZkBbE/+Z NgKmq7Riy7uzOr5veq8vW8sETLnua8FlbMBm3Mivqsa6/MqVXKga7I8QZLbEJGqWVS6Ss3hv 8TfqAjd5I7cGw5uR0sf20irQTLeDjCKauYEWe7gWO7K8ur4nMM5kurHqS7UgC6yaHMwRmG/Z IyeErCF7AIbqh4VF6nrNpF2r3M7ASrvjvKTn+rony77vi8sl8MBfDMGYPM61mqd0Os6JXKv2 ZyZPOEHjNxbrU0O5tF0iNx2iXJ/jdxO0FZEhM5gk3YOgnD9WKgBdjL5BDNO0C9NeTKe2KsRR 67423agl0MXEmqk+LbZLaqH3JwMeagJdPAACrKNBrNRe3K1MrcX/RDzUIzDVOU24Q82oNT3T dIrVRE0CPS2rdIp4LZoGlAqiZ416lMp7a/3WcB3Xcj3XdF3Xdj0FLeynLRB1qanXd30ReV0Y WiovpvrXgA0Vfg1bg23Mhu0PfRgr33eghiVLM0ud56Ea7eGvgng3EIsbktrY8NBOfjZXyRnY mDi3S/luSqyMrC23K1nYoO0KVQWeSmPa32h5P2OacFMoA1kqfR3bC3GC7aJbIcw31fVAGtNV gIyPP3mEsA3cnRBrEFTbiH3Hm5sSjTEaMCPF24iU0P0P0q1aTuY8z9xm7oJDjAaLCUYjru0l HPrdsBDe0DY+5P1rRWpCGg2egAKxKymg//D93wAe4AI+4ARe4AZ+4Aie4Aq+4Aze4A7+4BAe 4RI+4RRe4RZ+4Rie4Rq+4Rze4R7+4SAe4iI+4iRe4sT3ABGQ4iluACKQACie4g+QACrg4ioe 4yNgACqu4gmQ4xHwACkQASyOAgzA4wAw5DUe5EZe4wDw4jpeAgzAACXwAD4+AjSe4g0Q5EKe 4wyA5QBgAA1Q4zI+AjZOAhEA5QDw5T2O5BFA5lCO42EOADue41MuAjhOAjhO5GV+42je42++ 5H0OAHl+AlWe5jceAW++41g+6GN+5zm+5Dz+5y3O5GO+5HPe5YZO5ZL+5lLe4iluAg9g5iKw 6Y6e4wnA6FZO5/88DuR2ruqF/uZeDuZUHgEIMAKdLgJDzuK3zgIJwAAo/uS4DuO8nuKgXgJx /uloPuU4/ulPvuVP3uMMAOmcXulOXubLXuTUbuS/vuzPTunazuXW3ueiPupP/uLQzujjvuKc 7uxGPucozuV5vuMPgOa2vua03uaXTufN/ungfu+2PuTKDuhmXuzN3uNizuoiEOhRLuzBfu9u Hutq7uwvbub5/uTcvuzebu3OjuZmHu6WHubrzgAaH+o+7u8n8OkkIOpS3u3Jfu72ruy+vuoP gOUND+fAvu6obuYIgO6OPu8Xn+WxHvM3juKQDu8y3+sdbwIzjwIv3vPWPu0O3/RRLu3/087v ok7ysW7wBT/s8G7p/O7oDRDqOg/wNM/iBuDx9H7w9v7nSY/qtX7yc57nd77vXz/qWI7wI2D1 bE/2/I7oNA/0dC70Ys7uUk8CRB/0qs7xDV/4f3/4Uk7wJT/sKC/tSU/wa18Cdz7nDR/3Jx8B c+/4Rh7mnM/zLjDkBe/td+7pWG/rqA7plU/4ZW73JED6sX/27Q71bq8CSR7km57sJrDjcx/r w97ivw7ptf/ifv/ujn/3Zy/2lV/5Qz7kfx7ueQ79qM/ixh/ksA/oUo/jX5/0fF/7q077gq8C YU/nYY74l17+XX7+KQ7toQ75U87xR0/z3d/1lq/kR0/9Cc/i/18OAgAQNdEDIFEiMpEhwrHc wqQslm9s37ARAYOv36oHeESOrl4rmGwGTwAo8IR0FmGt3/JxSmV3Uu3SiOwlVMdHWhphsIC6 abIGJ8rwPtNoLPLaKaGpebWJvOWp3QDqAaS98Mjk/I1dBYX9NBhRxhBlbippblpG/TmpcDkN nZaJEJXcEdbJpK2kIbw+RSDEzYHSuSLebMkIxwn9PDAsM6yGxYAB/MANvzHTIbGRMTOseHH7 Aqc8GADW9gDGEJv5wUQDtpwYpynSBDYGhxHfxqSPwPmDRuhEvH+JnnFq9GgakzL+vjHzxXCU H0/G0AGhhk4Zs3QQlxlIllFHMnCdZP8lwBPQnZppNMCc6fWLTI12pm4AiZFgGZKQik4iNHWq 4QwXfGjKWFlURBtGF4O1O2emFRle6WBd5BJnR6xn+Fj58YeoZzWrUrBqDKaxZzJpPx/1wQjj oU0xoALiOcoOSdAjaT22I9IiC76DpgYrCUeHV590JPSum2kPQIlnhoqmdXuisNugJZdVrrY0 jcbJc+sipXNUjqSfUCUqc6Q3WJ2HGf0yXbKOYWGFJDq2Egvn8p7alW4nLZOMr1tRdF6E1qmX LqjoMODiVWM99wsvXBgn/StlpUrlrg27BWJrdvq56nEgd5QZ1GQu5KSVoOpemyPmnDkn1s8s qW1F2S4F9oP/GoJKSJGCMOWwFwd/CSBBTTY6NMGYPxDCoR6EL7QRkn/nNTLbJ5wcYqEJGAKh 4Rgc3uAgNU04995l9g2R3xzUbcJFAzmylt0KPgLZxWashZcginsMeRSA+RRXxIXHgNeEDvSA R9ZMwPhAyopGQHhKEakI0dkNE113nmlcBkgFH14+s6Y/9DihoJsXeflTdrEEsVadtF1ipmxx OjSGMXlmsecgrGhEZithRuGLbVic6eV9SvSpB6RV6JCOg+HEdppQl+hBWnqqACVdoqyEMU5x AvZ1w05nRjSTAdzMwE0zLCh2q2K76pTZrK7suhM3tugazrA+WFbrL7jSuoxlXo0p/y0t1mph 0hQkzecrU1l00wkz0+YRq7FwbOesuCDJmsW57PZwK7ZMHeutD+Pq5C6w14WRQBHv7rqvvywk O4OyEuE7TL/9zrelww9DHLHEE1NcscUXY5wxxOFq3LHHH4McMpghkVyyySejnLLKK7Pcsssv wxyzzDPTXLPNN+Ocs84789yzzb8oELTQQxNdtNFHI5200ksz3bTTT0MdtdRTU1211VdjnbXW W0+tmMhfgx222GOTXbbZZ6Odttprs92222/DHbfcc9Ndt91345233nvz3bfffwMeuOCDE164 4YcjnrjiizPeuOOPQx655JNTXrnll2Oeueabc96555+DHv+66KOTXrrpp6Oeuuqrs96666/D Hrvss9Neu+2345677rvz3rvvvwMfvPDDE1885BBIkLwDEkOwwA0OJJ88BGc3b7z1k1d/gATO Q1y9DA4sLwIE05ft/fXnN+69+Q6vLwL4MCxAPtnto1+/4dUvIMEBMECvPP/JL0B70vte+AAA gfAdAHkAhMEB+rc9/Ykgf9F7H/iQtz8Hjs95Eiyg/Tr4NwVKQH4OgMD+Erg87R0ggeLjXgwc GEIYjE8ECeReDAEgwf3lj4YSWB70yDfCEiLPedsz4P48aES+qW96+Sui+PY3RBiykH8OiF8L 5QcA7QFghDFYIgAgCEMeki9/MZj/oQGteMQz4s1825Ng9BaYQBKu8HnLO+D/2pg8E8pAf1jc Ig/DR8UYZC+IaByk3dS4ADFuApH0ex8K3cdB/lmRi14UXx9lOEkyWjKKhNxk29QnAfHBMYuf pKIiNZlFP5JPewiMoSojeEdR6rCS7oNjAreXwBQO8Y+c3CXaQBhKUUqviAqkoSnf50gZgrCA tVSeF9m4Q1m6L3oZBGb46MfLa1pujx8zIza76bgcIvOR3hzn6uI3QXKiM53qXCc72+nOd8Iz nvLkZANF1jztmTJiiBzjEx2my3nO04Ihu2c/KQY9TR4UYv8EKDxVKc6MWXNiIzTjAh+2UIa6 E3zaNOAI/wdYxxB6j42hrB4EH+g/ZE6QmwecIvzit8oJQvCAII1eIyPITYxes5HmQx756JhF Wi4QnD+NY0mHSMZW2vCFMjigLklIxzdaMqY7tOkxRTBJnHbTmNqsoQ2VeMkhFpSlJHUiC9+3 vouCFYfT06IWGRjTAv5xjxfFKi/t+ETzkdKMBLXr9MbaRSaalYlX5OYQzarBtWoypixsqvMi SldC/vOPePUqP4UoWCj+NbPHPKsZG4nCTyZ1qG7d32ThR0LQPhabVzVgYxfbU6AWNpRc9Osk 35c/PyrVrTD0KRa1lNfGahYGIcxnagd5USoGF5gg5Z5Ii4z4hr5UeWbcJxevRrnBZe5QsaZt IWqL+9iCBs6Y3p0nUqZGFSqOl7zJvCzg5pr3ZXk3vvKdL33ra9/743cqJt0vf/vr3/8COMAC zm8IAAA7 --------------AttPart_18790729==.OLA-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 11:23:53 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhrDo-000285-DT for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:23:49 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA12055 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:23:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhrCc-0001XT-4E; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:22:34 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhrCZ-0001U3-C4 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:22:31 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11894 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:21:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.flarion.com ([63.103.94.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhrX2-0003gZ-Cw for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:43:43 -0500 Received: from ftmailserver.flariontech.com ([10.10.1.140]) by mail.flarion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:22:18 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:22:18 -0500 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 2461bis and host-load-sharing Thread-Index: AcX2E8IQQFk9JKBZSiOxJp+gAchBegAf2cEA From: "Soliman, Hesham" To: "Bob Hinden" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 16:22:18.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[661AE070:01C5F693] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 34d35111647d654d033d58d318c0d21a Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Dave Thaler Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Bob, > > Dave, > > > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone =20 > > oppose Dave's suggestion > > below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ? >=20 > Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to =20 > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt? =3D> Sorry, I think I assumed too much. I was proposing the removal of=20 that sentence and replacing it with a reference to RFC 4311. I can send exact text to the list.=20 Hesham >=20 > One consideration is that the update to 2661 is being submitted at =20 > Draft standard and we need to be carefull to not make incompatible =20 > changes. This probably not the case here, but I would like to see =20 > the proposed text. >=20 > Thanks, > Bob >=20 >=20 > > Thx, > > Hesham > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org=20 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf =20 > Of Dave Thaler > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM > To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? > Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6: > > An implementation may choose to always return the same router or > > cycle through the router list in a round-robin fashion as long > > as it always returns a reachable or a probably reachable router > > when one is available. > > However RFC 4311 (draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt) updates > > RFC 2461, is a Proposed Standard, and says: > > [ND] ... > > specifies that an implementation may always choose the same router > > (e.g., the first in the list) or may cycle through the routers in > > a round-robin manner. Both of these suggestions are problematic. > > [...] > > If 2461bis is intended to obsolete RFC 2461, then I think the =20 > statement > > in 6.3.6 should be updated to be in accordance with RFC 4311. =20 > Otherwise > > RFC 4311 will have to be republished to update 2461bis. > > -Dave > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the =20 > sole > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by =20 > others is > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please =20 > contact > the sender and delete all copies. > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 13:04:37 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhsnN-0001P3-N1 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:04:37 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25863 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:03:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehsmo-0000jY-Lf; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:04:02 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehsmm-0000jQ-E0 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:04:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA25759 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:03:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail3.microsoft.com ([131.107.3.123]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eht7G-0007dG-64 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:25:13 -0500 Received: from mailout2.microsoft.com ([157.54.1.120]) by mail3.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:03:47 -0800 Received: from red-hub-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.3.6]) by mailout2.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:03:47 -0800 Received: from win-imc-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.39]) by red-hub-04.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:03:46 -0800 Received: from win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.5.41]) by win-imc-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:03:46 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:03:45 -0800 Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC114A5FB67@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> Thread-Topic: 2461bis and host-load-sharing thread-index: AcX2E8IQQFk9JKBZSiOxJp+gAchBegAf2cEAAAIkOeA= From: "Dave Thaler" To: "Soliman, Hesham" , "Bob Hinden" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 18:03:46.0165 (UTC) FILETIME=[92B85A50:01C5F6A1] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: ff03b0075c3fc728d7d60a15b4ee1ad2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed standard. I believe the options are: a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state of 4311 changes to then, since it's updating an obsoleted RFC. b) replace the text with a note that is classified as an=20 informative reference to 4311. c) replace the text with the 2 paragraphs from 4311, and have 2461bis also obsolete 4311. This doesn't yet qualify per Draft Standard rules so I don't think this option is really viable without delaying 2461bis.=20 I believe Hesham is suggesting (b), and if appropriate text can be constructed I would support this. -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:H.Soliman@flarion.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:22 AM > To: Bob Hinden > Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing >=20 > Hi Bob, >=20 > > > Dave, > > > > > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone > > > oppose Dave's suggestion > > > below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ? > > > > Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt? >=20 > =3D> Sorry, I think I assumed too much. I was proposing the removal of > that sentence and replacing it with a reference to RFC 4311. I can > send exact text to the list. >=20 > Hesham >=20 > > > > One consideration is that the update to 2661 is being submitted at > > Draft standard and we need to be carefull to not make incompatible > > changes. This probably not the case here, but I would like to see > > the proposed text. > > > > Thanks, > > Bob > > > > > > > Thx, > > > Hesham > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf > > Of Dave Thaler > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM > > To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? > > Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com; ipv6@ietf.org > > Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6: > > > > An implementation may choose to always return the same router or > > > > cycle through the router list in a round-robin fashion as long > > > > as it always returns a reachable or a probably reachable router > > > > when one is available. > > > > However RFC 4311 (draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt) updates > > > > RFC 2461, is a Proposed Standard, and says: > > > > [ND] ... > > > > specifies that an implementation may always choose the same router > > > > (e.g., the first in the list) or may cycle through the routers in > > > > a round-robin manner. Both of these suggestions are problematic. > > > > [...] > > > > If 2461bis is intended to obsolete RFC 2461, then I think the > > statement > > > > in 6.3.6 should be updated to be in accordance with RFC 4311. > > Otherwise > > > > RFC 4311 will have to be republished to update 2461bis. > > > > -Dave > > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the > > sole > > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by > > others is > > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please > > contact > > the sender and delete all copies. > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 13:08:45 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhsrN-0004ru-0u for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:08:45 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA26345 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:07:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhspT-0003n5-VM; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:06:47 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhspS-0003n0-VJ for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:06:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA26177 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.flarion.com ([63.103.94.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eht9y-0007kN-TG for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 13:27:59 -0500 Received: from ftmailserver.flariontech.com ([10.10.1.140]) by mail.flarion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:06:36 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:06:36 -0500 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 2461bis and host-load-sharing Thread-Index: AcX2E8IQQFk9JKBZSiOxJp+gAchBegAf2cEAAAIkOeAAAYgtQA== From: "Soliman, Hesham" To: "Dave Thaler" , "Bob Hinden" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 18:06:36.0671 (UTC) FILETIME=[F85980F0:01C5F6A1] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 2ed806e2f53ff1a061ad4f97e00345ac Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed > standard. >=20 > I believe the options are: > a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with > anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state > of 4311 changes to then, since it's updating an obsoleted RFC. > b) replace the text with a note that is classified as an=20 > informative reference to 4311. > c) replace the text with the 2 paragraphs from 4311, and have 2461bis > also obsolete 4311. This doesn't yet qualify per Draft=20 > Standard rules > so I don't think this option is really viable without=20 > delaying 2461bis.=20 >=20 > I believe Hesham is suggesting (b), and if appropriate text can be > constructed I would support this. =3D> Thanks for the detailed description. Yes I was suggesting (b) = above. Hesham >=20 > -Dave >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:H.Soliman@flarion.com] > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:22 AM > > To: Bob Hinden > > Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > >=20 > > Hi Bob, > >=20 > > > > Dave, > > > > > > > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone > > > > oppose Dave's suggestion > > > > below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ? > > > > > > Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt? > >=20 > > =3D> Sorry, I think I assumed too much. I was proposing the=20 > removal of > > that sentence and replacing it with a reference to RFC 4311. I can > > send exact text to the list. > >=20 > > Hesham > >=20 > > > > > > One consideration is that the update to 2661 is being=20 > submitted at > > > Draft standard and we need to be carefull to not make=20 > incompatible > > > changes. This probably not the case here, but I would=20 > like to see > > > the proposed text. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > Thx, > > > > Hesham > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org > > [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf > > > Of Dave Thaler > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM > > > To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? > > > Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com; ipv6@ietf.org > > > Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > > > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6: > > > > > > An implementation may choose to always return the=20 > same router or > > > > > > cycle through the router list in a round-robin=20 > fashion as long > > > > > > as it always returns a reachable or a probably=20 > reachable router > > > > > > when one is available. > > > > > > However RFC 4311=20 > (draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt) updates > > > > > > RFC 2461, is a Proposed Standard, and says: > > > > > > [ND] ... > > > > > > specifies that an implementation may always choose the same > router > > > > > > (e.g., the first in the list) or may cycle through=20 > the routers > in > > > > > > a round-robin manner. Both of these suggestions are > problematic. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > If 2461bis is intended to obsolete RFC 2461, then I think the > > > statement > > > > > > in 6.3.6 should be updated to be in accordance with RFC 4311. > > > Otherwise > > > > > > RFC 4311 will have to be republished to update 2461bis. > > > > > > -Dave > > > > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > This email may contain confidential and privileged=20 > material for the > > > sole > > > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by > > > others is > > > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended=20 > recipient please > > > contact > > > the sender and delete all copies. > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > > ipv6@ietf.org > > > Administrative Requests:=20 https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 14:22:53 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu17-0000r1-7k for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:22:53 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04556 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:22:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhtzD-00085o-Me; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:20:55 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhtzA-000844-W1 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:20:53 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04448 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:20:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com ([130.76.32.69]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhuJi-0001jN-8C for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:42:06 -0500 Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com ([192.76.190.6]) by blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (8.9.2.MG.10092003/8.8.5-M2) with ESMTP id LAA29046; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from XCH-NE-05P.ne.nos.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.11.3/8.11.3/MBS-AV-LDAP-01) with ESMTP id jB1JKeC24202; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:20:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from XCH-NE-1V2.ne.nos.boeing.com ([128.225.80.43]) by XCH-NE-05P.ne.nos.boeing.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:20:12 -0500 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:20:12 -0500 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 2461bis and host-load-sharing Thread-Index: AcX2E8IQQFk9JKBZSiOxJp+gAchBegAf2cEAAAIkOeAAA5VhUA== From: "Manfredi, Albert E" To: "Dave Thaler" , "Soliman, Hesham" , "Bob Hinden" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 19:20:12.0446 (UTC) FILETIME=[405B4BE0:01C5F6AC] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 3fbd9b434023f8abfcb1532abaec7a21 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It seems to me that it would be easier to obsolete RFC 4311 rather than trying to keep it and 2461bis in sync? And what's in 4311 seems straightforward and flexible enough to be easy to incorporate in 2461bis, no? If it weren't for the delay that option c might cause, wouldn't it be the simplest solution in the long run? Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Thaler [mailto:dthaler@windows.microsoft.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:04 PM > To: Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing >=20 > A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed > standard. >=20 > I believe the options are: > a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with > anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state > of 4311 changes to then, since it's updating an obsoleted RFC. > b) replace the text with a note that is classified as an=20 > informative reference to 4311. > c) replace the text with the 2 paragraphs from 4311, and have 2461bis > also obsolete 4311. This doesn't yet qualify per Draft Standard rules > so I don't think this option is really viable without=20 > delaying 2461bis.=20 >=20 > I believe Hesham is suggesting (b), and if appropriate text can be > constructed I would support this. >=20 > -Dave >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:H.Soliman@flarion.com] > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:22 AM > > To: Bob Hinden > > Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > >=20 > > Hi Bob, > >=20 > > > > Dave, > > > > > > > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone > > > > oppose Dave's suggestion > > > > below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ? > > > > > > Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt? > >=20 > > =3D> Sorry, I think I assumed too much. I was proposing the removal = of > > that sentence and replacing it with a reference to RFC 4311. I can > > send exact text to the list. > >=20 > > Hesham > >=20 > > > > > > One consideration is that the update to 2661 is being=20 > submitted at > > > Draft standard and we need to be carefull to not make=20 > incompatible > > > changes. This probably not the case here, but I would=20 > like to see > > > the proposed text. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > Thx, > > > > Hesham > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org > > [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf > > > Of Dave Thaler > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM > > > To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? > > > Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com; ipv6@ietf.org > > > Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > > > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6: > > > > > > An implementation may choose to always return the=20 > same router or > > > > > > cycle through the router list in a round-robin fashion as long > > > > > > as it always returns a reachable or a probably=20 > reachable router > > > > > > when one is available. > > > > > > However RFC 4311=20 > (draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt) updates > > > > > > RFC 2461, is a Proposed Standard, and says: > > > > > > [ND] ... > > > > > > specifies that an implementation may always choose the same > router > > > > > > (e.g., the first in the list) or may cycle through the routers > in > > > > > > a round-robin manner. Both of these suggestions are > problematic. > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > If 2461bis is intended to obsolete RFC 2461, then I think the > > > statement > > > > > > in 6.3.6 should be updated to be in accordance with RFC 4311. > > > Otherwise > > > > > > RFC 4311 will have to be republished to update 2461bis. > > > > > > -Dave > > > > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > This email may contain confidential and privileged=20 > material for the > > > sole > > > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by > > > others is > > > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please > > > contact > > > the sender and delete all copies. > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > > ipv6@ietf.org > > > Administrative Requests:=20 > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 14:24:14 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu2Q-0001w7-8s for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:24:14 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04693 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:23:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu0k-0000fB-63; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:22:30 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu0i-0000cy-V5 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:22:29 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04540 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:21:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from mgw-ext04.nokia.com ([131.228.20.96]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhuLF-0001mg-7I for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:43:42 -0500 Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext04.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id jB1JMKcv011851; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:22:21 +0200 Received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.28]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:22:22 +0200 Received: from [172.19.69.50] ([172.19.69.50]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:22:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Hinden Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:22:41 -0800 To: "ext Soliman, Hesham" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 19:22:22.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E22A490:01C5F6AC] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Dave Thaler Subject: Re: 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hesham, Dave, >> A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed >> standard. >> >> I believe the options are: >> a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with >> anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state >> of 4311 changes to then, since it's updating an obsoleted RFC. >> b) replace the text with a note that is classified as an >> informative reference to 4311. >> c) replace the text with the 2 paragraphs from 4311, and have 2461bis >> also obsolete 4311. This doesn't yet qualify per Draft >> Standard rules >> so I don't think this option is really viable without >> delaying 2461bis. >> >> I believe Hesham is suggesting (b), and if appropriate text can be >> constructed I would support this. > > => Thanks for the detailed description. Yes I was suggesting (b) > above. I think that is fine, but please send the proposed text to the list. Thanks, Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 14:26:31 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu4c-0003EM-Uq for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:26:31 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA05099 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:25:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu2O-0001sX-Ax; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:24:12 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehu2L-0001qw-Fp for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:24:10 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04678 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:23:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.microsoft.com ([131.107.3.125]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhuMq-0001qk-Jx for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:45:23 -0500 Received: from mailout1.microsoft.com ([157.54.1.117]) by mail1.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:23:56 -0800 Received: from red-hub-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.71]) by mailout1.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:23:56 -0800 Received: from win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.69.169]) by red-hub-01.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:23:55 -0800 Received: from win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.5.41]) by win-imc-02.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:23:55 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:23:44 -0800 Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC114A5FCDD@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> Thread-Topic: 2461bis and host-load-sharing thread-index: AcX2E8IQQFk9JKBZSiOxJp+gAchBegAf2cEAAAIkOeAAA5VhUAAAmO+Q From: "Dave Thaler" To: "Manfredi, Albert E" , "Soliman, Hesham" , "Bob Hinden" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 19:23:55.0322 (UTC) FILETIME=[C53379A0:01C5F6AC] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: ec7c6dab5a62df223002ae71b5179d41 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes it is straightforward to incorporate and would be the simplest solution in the long run. The issue with c is the Draft Standard requirements in RFC 2026: A specification from which at least two independent and interoperable implementations from different code bases have been developed, and for which sufficient successful operational experience has been obtained, may be elevated to the "Draft Standard" level. [...] The requirement for at least two independent and interoperable implementations applies to all of the options and features of the specification. In cases in which one or more options or features have not been demonstrated in at least two interoperable implementations, the specification may advance to the Draft Standard level only if those options or features are removed. -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Manfredi, Albert E [mailto:albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:20 AM > To: Dave Thaler; Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing >=20 > It seems to me that it would be easier to obsolete RFC 4311 rather than > trying to keep it and 2461bis in sync? And what's in 4311 seems > straightforward and flexible enough to be easy to incorporate in > 2461bis, no? >=20 > If it weren't for the delay that option c might cause, wouldn't it be > the simplest solution in the long run? >=20 > Bert >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Thaler [mailto:dthaler@windows.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 1:04 PM > > To: Soliman, Hesham; Bob Hinden > > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > > > A draft standard can't have a normative reference to a proposed > > standard. > > > > I believe the options are: > > a) remove the problematic text from 2461bis and don't replace it with > > anything (i.e., be silent on the issue). I'm not sure what the state > > of 4311 changes to then, since it's updating an obsoleted RFC. > > b) replace the text with a note that is classified as an > > informative reference to 4311. > > c) replace the text with the 2 paragraphs from 4311, and have 2461bis > > also obsolete 4311. This doesn't yet qualify per Draft Standard rules > > so I don't think this option is really viable without > > delaying 2461bis. > > > > I believe Hesham is suggesting (b), and if appropriate text can be > > constructed I would support this. > > > > -Dave > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:H.Soliman@flarion.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:22 AM > > > To: Bob Hinden > > > Cc: Dave Thaler; ipv6@ietf.org > > > Subject: RE: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > > > > > Hi Bob, > > > > > > > > Dave, > > > > > > > > > > I think we can handle this during IESG last call. Does anyone > > > > > oppose Dave's suggestion > > > > > below to update this statement according to RFC 4311 ? > > > > > > > > Before answering the question, what would the exact change be to > > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt? > > > > > > =3D> Sorry, I think I assumed too much. I was proposing the = removal of > > > that sentence and replacing it with a reference to RFC 4311. I can > > > send exact text to the list. > > > > > > Hesham > > > > > > > > > > > One consideration is that the update to 2661 is being > > submitted at > > > > Draft standard and we need to be carefull to not make > > incompatible > > > > changes. This probably not the case here, but I would > > like to see > > > > the proposed text. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thx, > > > > > Hesham > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org > > > [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf > > > > Of Dave Thaler > > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 1:37 PM > > > > To: JINMEI Tatuya / ???? > > > > Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com; ipv6@ietf.org > > > > Subject: 2461bis and host-load-sharing > > > > > > > > draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt says in 6.3.6: > > > > > > > > An implementation may choose to always return the > > same router or > > > > > > > > cycle through the router list in a round-robin fashion as long > > > > > > > > as it always returns a reachable or a probably > > reachable router > > > > > > > > when one is available. > > > > > > > > However RFC 4311 > > (draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt) updates > > > > > > > > RFC 2461, is a Proposed Standard, and says: > > > > > > > > [ND] ... > > > > > > > > specifies that an implementation may always choose the same > > router > > > > > > > > (e.g., the first in the list) or may cycle through the routers > > in > > > > > > > > a round-robin manner. Both of these suggestions are > > problematic. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > If 2461bis is intended to obsolete RFC 2461, then I think the > > > > statement > > > > > > > > in 6.3.6 should be updated to be in accordance with RFC 4311. > > > > Otherwise > > > > > > > > RFC 4311 will have to be republished to update 2461bis. > > > > > > > > -Dave > > > > > > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > This email may contain confidential and privileged > > material for the > > > > sole > > > > use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by > > > > others is > > > > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please > > > > contact > > > > the sender and delete all copies. > > > > = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > > > ipv6@ietf.org > > > > Administrative Requests: > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > > ipv6@ietf.org > > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 15:44:49 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhvIP-0006SS-7u for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:44:49 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA25170 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:44:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhvGf-0005H9-Hi; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:43:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhvGd-0005GX-UK for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:43:00 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24885 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:42:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.flarion.com ([63.103.94.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhvbB-0007ln-Sf for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:04:14 -0500 Received: from ftmailserver.flariontech.com ([10.10.1.140]) by mail.flarion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:42:50 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:42:49 -0500 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 2461bis and host-load-sharing Thread-Index: AcX2rJAS5iuVJByvRt2s2g73Vz1w4gACkspg From: "Soliman, Hesham" To: "Bob Hinden" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 20:42:50.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB4EBBF0:01C5F6B7] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, Dave Thaler Subject: Suggested text for 2461bis and host-load-sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here is the suggested text. The current version of this=20 section is at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt I believe Dave's comment only applies to point 1) in the=20 current draft. So I only changed that point. The rest doesn't seem to contradict 4311.=20 Comments? Hesham 6.3.6. Default Router Selection The algorithm for selecting a router depends in part on whether or not a router is known to be reachable. The exact details of how a node keeps track of a neighbor's reachability state are covered in Section 7.3. The algorithm for selecting a default router is invoked during next-hop determination when no Destination Cache entry exists for an off-link destination or when communication through an existing router appears to be failing. Under normal conditions, a router would be selected the first time traffic is sent to a destination, with subsequent traffic for that destination using the same router as indicated in the Destination Cache modulo any changes to the Destination Cache caused by Redirect messages. The policy for selecting routers from the Default Router List is as follows: 1) Routers that are reachable or probably reachable (i.e., in any state other than INCOMPLETE) SHOULD be preferred over routers whose reachability is unknown or suspect (i.e., in the INCOMPLETE state, or for which no Neighbor Cache entry exists). Further implementation hints on default router selection when multiple equivalent routers are available are discussed in=20 [LD-SHRE]. 2) When no routers on the list are known to be reachable or probably reachable, routers SHOULD be selected in a round-robin fashion, so that subsequent requests for a default router do not return the same router until all other routers have been selected. Cycling through the router list in this case ensures that all available routers are actively probed by the Neighbor Unreachability Detection algorithm. A request for a default router is made in conjunction with the sending of a packet to a router, and the selected router will be probed for reachability as a side effect. [LD-SHRE] RFC 4311. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole = use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is = strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the = sender and delete all copies. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 18:21:12 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ehxjk-0003l0-4G for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:21:12 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA00441 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:20:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhxgM-0002oF-80; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:17:42 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EhxgK-0002o5-En for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:17:40 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA00080 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:16:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.av.it.pt ([193.136.92.53] helo=av.it.pt) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ehy0s-0002d8-Th for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:38:56 -0500 Received: from [84.90.29.195] (account aamaral@av.it.pt) by av.it.pt (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.7) with HTTP id 3649975; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:15:50 +0000 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio?= Amaral" To: "IPng" , "M6bone" X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.7 Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 23:15:50 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ietf.org id SAA00080 Subject: Bootsrap mecanism new PIM Neighbor X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All, After draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-05.txt there is a section ---- 3.5. Unicasting Bootstrap Messages to New and Rebooting=20 Routers To allow new or rebooting routers to learn the RP-Set=20 quickly, when a Hello message is received from a new neighbor, or a Hello=20 message with a new GenID is received from an existing neighbor, one=20 router on the LAN unicasts a stored copy of the Bootstrap message for each=20 admin scope zone to the new or rebooting router. (....) -------- What is the motivation for this behaviour? With a common=20 bootstrap message new router also learn the RP-Set=20 quickly, am I right? In my opinion when a new router placed on the LAN sends a=20 PIM Hello message, one router on the LAN could simply send=20 a bootstrap message and new router also learn the RP-Set=20 quickly. Thanks in advance Best Regards AA -------------------------------------------------------- Ant=F3nio Manuel Nunes C. Amaral Instituto de Telecomunica=E7=F5es - P=F3lo de Aveiro Campus Universit=E1rio 3810-193 AVEIRO - PORTUGAL Telef. 234 - 377900 Fax. 234 - 377901 e-mail: aamaral@av.it.pt Telef. directo. 234 - 377906 --------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 21:24:07 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei0ak-0006xp-6s for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:24:07 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA21664 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:23:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei0Te-0003zZ-TN; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:16:46 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei0Td-0003zM-OD; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:16:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA19617; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:15:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ei0oE-0001Cm-NZ; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:38:03 -0500 Received: from ISI.EDU (adma.isi.edu [128.9.160.239]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id jB22FCE26983; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:15:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200512020215.jB22FCE26983@boreas.isi.edu> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary=NextPart Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:15:12 -0800 X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: rfc-ed@isi.edu X-Spam-Score: -14.6 (--------------) X-Scan-Signature: 1a1bf7677bfe77d8af1ebe0e91045c5b Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: RFC 4311 on IPv6 Host-to-Router Load Sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org --NextPart A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4311 Title: IPv6 Host-to-Router Load Sharing Author(s): R. Hinden, D. Thaler Status: Standards Track Date: November 2005 Mailbox: bob.hinden@nokia.com, dthaler@microsoft.com Pages: 5 Characters: 10156 Updates: 2461 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4311.txt The original IPv6 conceptual sending algorithm does not do load sharing among equivalent IPv6 routers, and suggests schemes that can be problematic in practice. This document updates the conceptual sending algorithm in RFC 2461 so that traffic to different destinations can be distributed among routers in an efficient fashion. This document is a product of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="RFC-INFO@RFC-EDITOR.ORG" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <051201181352.RFC@RFC-EDITOR.ORG> RETRIEVE: rfc DOC-ID: rfc4311 --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="rfc4311.txt"; site="ftp.isi.edu"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="in-notes" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <051201181352.RFC@RFC-EDITOR.ORG> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --NextPart-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 01 21:29:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei0fZ-0000mo-CW for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:29:05 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA23207 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:28:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei0U0-00046j-9w; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:17:08 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei0Ty-00046a-VI; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:17:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA19703; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:16:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ei0oa-0001Ez-2B; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:38:24 -0500 Received: from ISI.EDU (adma.isi.edu [128.9.160.239]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id jB22FAE26976; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:15:10 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200512020215.jB22FAE26976@boreas.isi.edu> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary=NextPart Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:15:10 -0800 X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: rfc-ed@isi.edu X-Spam-Score: -14.6 (--------------) X-Scan-Signature: 1a1bf7677bfe77d8af1ebe0e91045c5b Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: RFC 4311 on IPv6 Host-to-Router Load Sharing X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org --NextPart A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4311 Title: IPv6 Host-to-Router Load Sharing Author(s): R. Hinden, D. Thaler Status: Standards Track Date: November 2005 Mailbox: bob.hinden@nokia.com, dthaler@microsoft.com Pages: 5 Characters: 10156 Updates: 2461 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ipv6-host-load-sharing-04.txt URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4311.txt The original IPv6 conceptual sending algorithm does not do load sharing among equivalent IPv6 routers, and suggests schemes that can be problematic in practice. This document updates the conceptual sending algorithm in RFC 2461 so that traffic to different destinations can be distributed among routers in an efficient fashion. This document is a product of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard Protocol. This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG Subject: getting rfcs help: ways_to_get_rfcs Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC Authors, for further information. Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza USC/Information Sciences Institute ... Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the RFCs. --NextPart Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; Boundary="OtherAccess" --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; access-type="mail-server"; server="RFC-INFO@RFC-EDITOR.ORG" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <051201181352.RFC@RFC-EDITOR.ORG> RETRIEVE: rfc DOC-ID: rfc4311 --OtherAccess Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="rfc4311.txt"; site="ftp.isi.edu"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="in-notes" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <051201181352.RFC@RFC-EDITOR.ORG> --OtherAccess-- --NextPart Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --NextPart-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 02 06:04:42 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei8iV-0004QH-Ni for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 06:04:42 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA06909 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:03:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei8fp-0003H1-CN; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 06:01:53 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ei8fn-0003En-3L for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 06:01:51 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA06787 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:01:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es ([163.117.136.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ei90Q-0001w8-Jz for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 06:23:11 -0500 Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5991D842EA for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:01:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [163.117.139.65] (chelo-it-uc3m-es.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.65]) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F148841E3 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:01:39 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <6400a911d7bd8a2b8b3504e60943db67@it.uc3m.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: ipv6@ietf.org From: marcelo bagnulo braun Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:01:57 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 386e0819b1192672467565a524848168 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, we would like to submit this draft for the consideration of the IPv6 wg. This draft identifies limitations in RFC3484 in multihomed configurations. The conclusion is that some changes are needed to properly support such cases. The goal of the draft is to foster discussion and try to determine if we need to generate a rfc3484bis to overcome the identified problems Comments? Regards, marcelo Inicio mensaje reenviado: > De: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org > Fecha: 1 de diciembre de 2005 21:50:02 GMT+01:00 > Para: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Asunto: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt > Responder a: internet-drafts@ietf.org > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : Updating RFC 3484 for multihoming support > Author(s) : M. Bagnulo > Filename : draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2005-12-1 > > This note describes the limitations of RFC 3484 in multihomed > environments and proposes possible updates to the default address > selection mechanisms in order to cope with the identified > limitations. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update > -00.txt > > To remove yourself from the I-D Announcement list, send a message to > i-d-announce-request@ietf.org with the word unsubscribe in the body of > the message. > You can also visit https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/I-D-announce > to change your subscription settings. > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the > username > "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, > type "cd internet-drafts" and then > "get draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt". > > A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in > http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. > > Send a message to: > mailserv@ietf.org. > In the body type: > "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt". > > NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in > MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this > feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" > command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or > a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers > exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with > "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split > up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on > how to manipulate these messages. > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > Internet-Draft. > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-ID: <2005-12-1145325.I-D@ietf.org> > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 02 08:43:24 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiBC8-00083M-Kj for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:43:24 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA24319 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:42:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiB5s-0004p3-GT; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:36:56 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiB5q-0004nm-CQ for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:36:54 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA23579 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:36:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiBQS-0007Zs-Dg for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:58:17 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (PPP409.air-4x8x.dti.ne.jp [210.170.213.195]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326981521A; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:36:20 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:36:04 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Soliman, Hesham" In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 8fbbaa16f9fd29df280814cb95ae2290 Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com, Brian Haberman , IPv6 WG Subject: Re: Fwd: Request To Advance: X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org (Sorry for the delayed response...I hope you still remember the context) >>>>> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:06:20 -0500, >>>>> "Soliman, Hesham" said: > Sending in hibernate mode. >> I'm not sure if this one is correctly addressed: >> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05107.html >> (BTW: msg05107 is a comment on version 03, and I could not get a 04 >> version. Has that version been issued, or is the version number >> bumped?) >> >> I've compared the difference of the state machine in Appendix C >> between the 03 and 05 versions (attached below). At least it doesn't >> seem to cover the case where the neighbor cache entry does not exist. > => This is not the issue you are pointing to above. This issue above was about receiving > a message without SLLAO. Whether a Neighbor cache entry existed or not doesn't > seem to affect this. Please re-read the thread starting at: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04329.html I thought this discussion was the trigger of the change to APPENDIX C in version 05. If not, please specify a pointer of the source of this particular set of change (e.g., ML archive). Assuming the above discussion is the source, the essential point at that time was that the spec is unclear on the case where - an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO - the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for the source/target (see one of my comments in the thread: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04387.html and the follow-ups to this message) while the very original message of msg04329.html specifically mentioned RS, it is essentially common to all 'unsolicited' messages (RA, NS, and redirects in addition to RS). If my memory correct, the consensus at that time was that it would be good to clarify this point in the general form. So, the change to APPENDIX C should cover the case of - an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO - the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for the source/target for RA, RS, NS and redirect. That's why I made this comment. Again, if the source of the change to 05 is different than this discussion, please specify a pointer to the real source. >> It also does not cover the case where a Redirect message (w/o target >> link-layer address option) caused the situation in question. In > => This might be something to discuss. Could you elaborate? Are you saying there > is a Redirect message without the LLAO (that itself is not a problem AFAIK) ? See above. >> addition, I don't understand the following entry (added in 05): >> >> + INCOMPLETE NA, Solicited=any, Send ICMP error >> unchanged >> + Override=any, No (if router) or >> + Link-layer address log error (if host) >> + >> >> Which ICMP error is expected to be sent in this case? > => Destination unreachable. > Why do we >> separate the case for router and host? > => Because a host can't send it to anyone. A router would send it to the off-link node > trying to reach the router's neighbo (e.g. when this happens during address resolution). Hmm..., this sounds strange to me in a couple of points. First of all, which part of the main text specifies this behavior? As far as I can see, the only text that explicitly mentions ICMPv6 destination unreachable error to be sent is in Section 7.2.2, where the error is sent upon retransmit timeout for NS messages (which is clearly a different scenario than this one). Secondly, if we separate the case for routers and for hosts here, why don't we do the same thing in this case? INCOMPLETE Retransmit timeout, Discard entry - N or more Send ICMP error retransmissions. (this one corresponds to the above 'retransmission timeout' case). In my understanding, the general sense of RFC2461 about the ICMPv6 destination unreachable is that this 'error' is a conceptual one as described in Section 2.1: ICMP destination unreachable indication - an error indication returned to the original sender of a packet that cannot be delivered for the reasons outlined in [ICMPv6]. If the error occurs on a node other than the node originating the packet, an ICMP error message is generated. If the error occurs on the originating node, an implementation is not required to actually create and send an ICMP error packet to the source, as long as the upper-layer sender is notified through an appropriate mechanism (e.g., return value from a procedure call). Note, however, that an implementation may find it convenient in some cases to return errors to the sender by taking the offending packet, generating an ICMP error message, and then delivering it (locally) through the generic error handling routines. and the main text does not differentiate between the router case and the host case. If you really want to treat the two cases separately in APPENDIX C, I don't necessarily object to that particular decision. However, the decision should at least be consistent throughout the appendix. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 02 10:44:45 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiD5Z-00045t-TX for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:44:45 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA08838 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:43:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiD3G-0002Wu-Ps; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:42:22 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiD3C-0002Vf-FC for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:42:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA08347 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:41:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.flarion.com ([63.103.94.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiDNs-0003Wl-Fz for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 11:03:42 -0500 Received: from ftmailserver.flariontech.com ([10.10.1.140]) by mail.flarion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:42:03 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:42:02 -0500 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Fwd: Request To Advance: Thread-Index: AcX3RWRtq6qYIjviTf6baq1t3hQfoQAD5DMA From: "Soliman, Hesham" To: "JINMEI Tatuya / ????" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2005 15:42:03.0175 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0F4CB70:01C5F756] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 20f22c03b5c66958bff5ef54fcda6e48 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com, Brian Haberman , IPv6 WG Subject: RE: Fwd: Request To Advance: X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >=20 > (Sorry for the delayed response...I hope you still remember the > context) =3D> No probs, I remember it clearly. > >> I've compared the difference of the state machine in Appendix C > >> between the 03 and 05 versions (attached below). At=20 > least it doesn't > >> seem to cover the case where the neighbor cache entry=20 > does not exist. >=20 > > =3D> This is not the issue you are pointing to above. This=20 > issue above was about receiving > > a message without SLLAO. Whether a Neighbor cache entry=20 > existed or not doesn't > > seem to affect this. >=20 > Please re-read the thread starting at: > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04329.html >=20 > I thought this discussion was the trigger of the change to APPENDIX C > in version 05. If not, please specify a pointer of the=20 > source of this > particular set of change (e.g., ML archive). =3D> Sure, this is what triggered the issue. >=20 > Assuming the above discussion is the source, the essential point at > that time was that the spec is unclear on the case where >=20 > - an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO > - the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for the > source/target =3D> Correct. >=20 > (see one of my comments in the thread: > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg04387.html > and the follow-ups to this message) >=20 > while the very original message of msg04329.html specifically > mentioned RS, it is essentially common to all 'unsolicited' messages > (RA, NS, and redirects in addition to RS). If my memory correct, the > consensus at that time was that it would be good to clarify=20 > this point > in the general form. =20 =3D> Agreed. In addition to Appendix C, we also agreed on the list to = add a paragraph to section 7.2 (text from Greg Daley) to clarify the general handling. This = was also added. So, the change to APPENDIX C should cover the > case of >=20 > - an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO > - the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for the > source/target >=20 > for RA, RS, NS and redirect. >=20 > That's why I made this comment. Again, if the source of the=20 > change to > 05 is different than this discussion, please specify a pointer to the > real source. =3D> Your comment seemed to indicate that the non-existence of the cache = entry was a separate issue, but I don't think it is. The reception of an ND = message without the SLLAO is only a problem if no entry existed. In other words, we = wouldn't have registered this issue from the beginning if it were related to cases = where the receiving node already had an entry.=20 I might have misunderstood your comment but you also seemed to indicate = that there=20 was a difference between the following two cases: - Receiving an NS without SLLAO, which was triggered by the reception = of a REDIRECT (at the sending node) - Receiving an NS without SLLAO for other reasons.=20 As far as the spec is concerned both cases are the same, do you = disagree? If you only mean: "Add the case for REDIRECT received without SLLAO" = that's ok with me. I can add that but I don't see any other distinction.=20 >=20 > > =3D> Because a host can't send it to anyone. A router would=20 > send it to the off-link node > > trying to reach the router's neighbo (e.g. when this=20 > happens during address resolution).=20 >=20 > Hmm..., this sounds strange to me in a couple of points. >=20 > First of all, which part of the main text specifies this=20 > behavior? As > far as I can see, the only text that explicitly mentions ICMPv6 > destination unreachable error to be sent is in Section 7.2.2, where > the error is sent upon retransmit timeout for NS messages (which is > clearly a different scenario than this one). >=20 > Secondly, if we separate the case for routers and for hosts here, why > don't we do the same thing in this case? >=20 > INCOMPLETE Retransmit timeout, Discard entry - > N or more Send ICMP error > retransmissions. >=20 > (this one corresponds to the above 'retransmission timeout' case). >=20 > In my understanding, the general sense of RFC2461 about the ICMPv6 > destination unreachable is that this 'error' is a conceptual one as > described in Section 2.1: >=20 > ICMP destination unreachable indication > - an error indication returned to the original sender > of a packet that cannot be delivered for the reasons > outlined in [ICMPv6]. If the error occurs on a node > other than the node originating the packet, an ICMP > error message is generated. If the error occurs on > the originating node, an implementation is not > required to actually create and send an ICMP error > packet to the source, as long as the upper-layer > sender is notified through an appropriate mechanism > (e.g., return value from a procedure call). Note, > however, that an implementation may find it > convenient in some cases to return errors to the > sender by taking the offending packet, generating an > ICMP error message, and then delivering it (locally) > through the generic error handling routines. >=20 > and the main text does not differentiate between the router case and > the host case. >=20 > If you really want to treat the two cases separately in APPENDIX C, I > don't necessarily object to that particular decision. However, the > decision should at least be consistent throughout the appendix. =3D> Good points. I agree with that. So to keep it consistent, I'll = remove this distinction between host and router.=20 Hesham =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole = use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is = strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the = sender and delete all copies. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 02 22:02:24 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiNfM-0002aB-7F for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:02:24 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA05828 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:01:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiNbT-0001QS-N1; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:58:23 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiNbR-0001QF-D0 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:58:21 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA04653 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:57:33 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512030257.VAA04653@ietf.org> Received: from [202.205.253.249] (helo=sammy.buptnet.edu.cn) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiNw4-0006dy-0J for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:19:51 -0500 Received: (qmail 32283 invoked by uid 89); 3 Dec 2005 02:57:59 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 32275, pid: 32278, t: 0.4147s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 clamav: 0.85.1/m:31/d:897 spam: 3.0.2 Received: from unknown (HELO WANGY) (wangy@210.25.132.96) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Dec 2005 02:57:58 -0000 From: "??" To: Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:58:02 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcX3tWBMJyN0Rc9FTK6ZoynVoxp+BQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on sammy X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0f1ff0b0158b41ac6b9548d0972cdd31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: unsubcribe X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sat Dec 03 16:58:43 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EifP1-0004pl-4F for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:58:43 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA07456 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EifNX-0004Yx-2J; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:57:11 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EifNV-0004Ys-1r for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:57:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA07327 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:56:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from tyholt.uninett.no ([158.38.60.10]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EifiR-0004yF-Hp for ipv6@ietf.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:18:49 -0500 Received: from storhaugen.uninett.no (storhaugen.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:7:211:d8ff:fe8f:1f9b]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB3Luuji020716; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:56:56 +0100 Received: from storhaugen.uninett.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by storhaugen.uninett.no (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB3LuumL013216; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:56:56 +0100 Received: (from venaas@localhost) by storhaugen.uninett.no (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jB3LutwV013215; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:56:55 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: storhaugen.uninett.no: venaas set sender to Stig.Venaas@uninett.no using -f Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:56:55 +0100 From: Stig Venaas To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio?= Amaral Message-ID: <20051203215655.GD12857@storhaugen.uninett.no> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tyholt.uninett.no id jB3Luuji020716 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: IPng , M6bone Subject: Re: [m6bone] Bootsrap mecanism new PIM Neighbor X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 11:15:50PM +0000, Ant=F3nio Amaral wrote: > Dear All, >=20 > After draft-ietf-pim-sm-bsr-05.txt there is a section >=20 > ---- > 3.5. Unicasting Bootstrap Messages to New and Rebooting=20 > Routers >=20 > To allow new or rebooting routers to learn the RP-Set=20 > quickly, when a > Hello message is received from a new neighbor, or a Hello=20 > message with a > new GenID is received from an existing neighbor, one=20 > router on the LAN > unicasts a stored copy of the Bootstrap message for each=20 > admin scope > zone to the new or rebooting router. > (....) > -------- >=20 > What is the motivation for this behaviour? With a common=20 > bootstrap message new router also learn the RP-Set=20 > quickly, am I right? > In my opinion when a new router placed on the LAN sends a=20 > PIM Hello message, one router on the LAN could simply send=20 > a bootstrap message and new router also learn the RP-Set=20 > quickly. That's what happens. The text in bsr spec, does exactly what you write above. When a new router send a PIM hello, an existing router may unicast a BSM to it. Stig >=20 > Thanks in advance > Best Regards >=20 > AA > -------------------------------------------------------- > Ant=F3nio Manuel Nunes C. Amaral > Instituto de Telecomunica=E7=F5es - P=F3lo de Aveiro > Campus Universit=E1rio > 3810-193 AVEIRO - PORTUGAL > Telef. 234 - 377900 > Fax. 234 - 377901 > e-mail: aamaral@av.it.pt > Telef. directo. 234 - 377906 > --------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sun Dec 04 00:04:36 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eim3A-0002F5-0V for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:04:36 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA05015 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 00:03:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EilzN-0001Ni-M3; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:00:41 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EilzM-0001Lz-2D for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:00:40 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA04875 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:59:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net ([66.92.66.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EimKM-0006r2-La for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:22:24 -0500 Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD845331 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 00:00:13 -0500 (EST) To: ipv6@ietf.org From: Rob Austein Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 00:00:13 -0500 Message-Id: <20051204050013.CD845331@cyteen.hactrn.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22 Subject: Weekly posting summary for ipv6@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 15.15% | 5 | 19.80% | 42534 | h.soliman@flarion.com 12.12% | 4 | 15.72% | 33765 | vishwas@sinett.com 12.12% | 4 | 9.55% | 20523 | stig.venaas@uninett.no 9.09% | 3 | 6.86% | 14735 | bob.hinden@nokia.com 6.06% | 2 | 8.32% | 17869 | dthaler@windows.microsoft.com 6.06% | 2 | 6.17% | 13258 | rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org 3.03% | 1 | 4.11% | 8839 | jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp 3.03% | 1 | 4.04% | 8680 | albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com 3.03% | 1 | 3.97% | 8524 | radhakrishnan@zazunetworks.com 3.03% | 1 | 3.23% | 6949 | obaidasyed@gmail.com 3.03% | 1 | 2.83% | 6077 | marcelo@it.uc3m.es 3.03% | 1 | 2.56% | 5506 | srisuresh@yahoo.com 3.03% | 1 | 2.10% | 4518 | sra+ipng@hactrn.net 3.03% | 1 | 2.10% | 4509 | aamaral@av.it.pt 3.03% | 1 | 1.95% | 4179 | ot@cisco.com 3.03% | 1 | 1.89% | 4063 | pekkas@netcore.fi 3.03% | 1 | 1.78% | 3819 | mailman-owner@ietf.org 3.03% | 1 | 1.63% | 3504 | 77cronux.leed0621@huawei.com 3.03% | 1 | 1.39% | 2982 | wangy@buptnet.edu.cn --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 33 |100.00% | 214833 | Total Grunchweather Associates provides this automatic summary on an at-whim basis at the request of the IPv6 WG chairs. Your mileage may vary. We decline responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors. If this script produces broken output, you get to keep both pieces. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From fco.rica@best-lamps.com Sun Dec 04 13:20:28 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiyTM-00036h-TN for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:20:28 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA03809 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:19:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from p508a197c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.138.25.124] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiyoJ-0007li-In for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:42:19 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5f8fd$db532200$0100007f@localhost> From: "Isaiah Jones" To: Subject: cheap oem soft shipping //orldwide Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:20:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F8FD.DB532200" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 3.4 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F8FD.DB532200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 43 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 33 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 31 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F8FD.DB532200 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

Microsoft

ON SALE NOW!
1 Office Pro 2003
2 Adobe Photoshop 9.0
3 Windows XP Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
5 Flash MX 2004
6 Corel Draw 12
7 Norton Antivirus 2005
8 Windows 2003 Server
9 Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
10 Adobe Illustrator 11
See more by this manufacturer

Symantec
Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $550.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 35 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $200.00
OurPrice: $49.95
YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 42 review! s)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
   by Adobe

ListPrice: $599.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 46 reviews)
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F8FD.DB532200-- From doan@about.com Sun Dec 04 13:21:32 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EiyUO-0003YN-6r for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:21:32 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA03920 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:20:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from dyn-83-157-113-172.ppp.tiscali.fr ([83.157.113.172] helo=83.157.113.172) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EiypS-0007nf-8a for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:43:23 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Steven A. Norman" To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Replica watch models Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:06:42 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_C3995011.AE3B05D7" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express V6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_C3995011.AE3B05D7 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0001_AF11AD57.772D9699" ------=_NextPart_001_0001_AF11AD57.772D9699 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit EXACT COPIES OF SWISS WATCHES - exact copies of the original watches - perfect as a gift for your colleagues and friends - free gift box Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega Cartier, Bvlgari, Franck Muller .. and 15 other most famous manufacturers. http://www.slatternly.com All copies are for only $239.95 - $279.95! ________________________________ To change your mail preferences, go here ________________________________ ------=_NextPart_001_0001_AF11AD57.772D9699 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

EXACT COPIES OF SWISS WATCHES

- exact copies of the original watches
- perfect as a gift for your colleagues and friends
- free gift box

Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega
Cartier, Bvlgari, Franck Muller

.. and 15 other most famous manufacturers.

http://www.slatternly.com

All copies are for only $239.95 - $279.95!

________________________________
To change your mail preferences, go here
________________________________

------=_NextPart_001_0001_AF11AD57.772D9699-- ------=_NextPart_000_0000_C3995011.AE3B05D7-- From Loeou@optonline.net Sun Dec 04 13:43:47 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eiypv-0000sb-L5; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:43:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05603; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:42:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512041842.NAA05603@ietf.org> Received: from 71.4.95.9.ptr.us.xo.net ([71.4.95.9] helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EizB4-0008Q0-5I; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:05:38 -0500 From: "Patti Barlow" To: l2vpn-admin@ietf.org Subject: Re: Important question Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:39:45 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_VUXWJDIQ.BLMGKVFU" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_VUXWJDIQ.BLMGKVFU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your portfolio has been presented to the specific peoples, and upon meticulous consideration, we are able to give to you the subsequent opening offer. Based upon meticulous consideration you meet the requirements to get hold of a openhanded earnings on your original property investment. By completing the subsequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to complete our review, and we feel convinced you will get hold of not only a reduced rate of interest, but also a cash return that will realize all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to complete this juncture of the treaty. With kind regards, Patti Barlow Should you prefer not to enjoy participation of this holiday opening offer you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_VUXWJDIQ.BLMGKVFU Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your portfolio has been presented to the specific peoples, and upon meticulous consideration, we are able to give to you the subsequent opening offer.

Based upon meticulous consideration you meet the requirements to get hold of a openhanded earnings on your original property investment.

By completing the subsequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to complete our review, and we feel convinced you will get hold of not only a reduced rate of interest, but also a cash return that will realize all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to complete this juncture of the treaty.

With kind regards,

Patti Barlow

Should you prefer not to enjoy participation of this holiday opening offer you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_VUXWJDIQ.BLMGKVFU-- From AllisonSloan@bloodtruth.com Sun Dec 04 14:49:01 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eizr3-0000mq-Ag; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:49:01 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA10618; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:48:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej0CC-0001jH-7U; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:10:52 -0500 Received: from dsl51b67e0c.pool.t-online.hu ([81.182.126.12]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Eizqc-0005OY-CI; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:48:41 -0500 Received: from LgaK@localhost by yiK.int (8.11.6/8.11.6); Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:46:51 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Gina Mandelbrot" Reply-To: "Gina Mandelbrot" To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: MS Office XP Pro $49.95 Systemworks Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:47:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.2730.2 X-Sender: AllisonSloan@bloodtruth.com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--pG54hXmfNl0CYDu" X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Scan-Signature: a4cdc653ecdd96665f2aa1c1af034c9e UB0 ----pG54hXmfNl0CYDu Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 4
Opt-in Email Special Offer   = ; unsubscribe me
= =
=

SEARCH

Microsoft Window= s XP Professional *w/SP2*
Microsoft
<= tr vAlign=3Dtop bgColor=3D#333399>

TOP 10 NEW TITLES
=
= <= /tr>
<= p align=3Dcenter> ON SALE NOW!
= ; 1 Windows XP Pro SP2
= ; 2 Creative Suite 2
3 MS Office 2003 Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
<= /td> 5 Macromedia Flash 8
= 6 Dreamweaver 8
7 = Norton Sysworks 2005
8 Adobe GoLive CS2
9 Adobe Illustrator CS2
= ; 10 Borland Architect 2005
&= nbsp; See more by this manufacturer
Microsoft
Macromedia
Ado= be
Customers also b= ought
these other items...
<= /p>
Choose:<= /b>
= <= input type=3Dimage alt=3DGo src=3Dhttp://g-images.amazon.com/images/G/01/s= earch-browse/go-button-software.gif value=3DGo border=3D0 name=3Dsubmit.di= splay-variation width=3D21 height=3D21>
<= /tr>
List Price: $299.00
Price: $49.99
Y= ou Save: $249.01 (80%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download= !
Coupon Code: bHVFZ
Platform: Windows XP
Sales Rank: #1
System requirements | Other Versions
Date Coupo= n Expires: December 31st, 2005
Averag= e Customer Review: 3D"5 Based on 199579 reviews. Write a review.

Adobe Creative Suite 2 *Pr= emium*
Adobe=
Choose:

List Price: $1199.00
Price: $149.99
You Save: $1049.01 (95%)

= Availability: Available for INSTANT download!
Coupon Code: RFES1eo
Platform: Windows XP
Sales Rank: #= 2
System = requirements | Other Ver= sions
Date Coupon Expires: Decemb= er 31st, 2005
Average Customer Review: Based on 11332 reviews. Write = a review.

Microsoft Office 2003 *Profession= al*
Microsof= t
Choose:

<= /p><= /tr>
List Price: $499.00
Price: $69.99
Y= ou Save: $429.01 (85%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download= !
Coupon Code: LEkNf
Platform: Windows XP
Sales Rank: #3
System requirements | Other Versions
Date Coupo= n Expires: December 31st, 2005
Averag= e Customer Review: 3D"5 Based on 169911 reviews. Write a review.

Adobe Acrob= at Professional V 7.0
Adobe=
=
Choose:

=
List Price:<= /b> $499.00
Price: $69.99
You Save: $429.01 (85%)

= Availability: Available for INSTANT download!
Coupon Code: 49oZUFT
Platform: Windows XP
Sales Rank: #= 4
System = requirements | Other Ver= sions
Date Coupon Expires: Decemb= er 31st, 2005
Average Customer Review: Based on 1263 reviews. Write a= review.

----pG54hXmfNl0CYDu-- From iji@adroitmedia.com Sun Dec 04 22:44:45 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ej7HR-0000C6-20 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:44:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA20845 for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 22:43:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from pool-70-111-126-151.nwrk.east.verizon.net ([70.111.126.151] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ej7cc-00075M-Td for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:06:40 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5f94c$d49fcb80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Antonio Henderson" To: Subject: 0EM Software Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:44:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F94C.D49FCB80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F94C.D49FCB80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 49 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 48 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 42 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F94C.D49FCB80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
1 Office Pro 2003
2 Adobe Photoshop 9.0
3 Windows XP Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
5 Flash MX 2004
6 Corel Draw 12
7 ! Norton Antivirus 2005
8 Windows 2003 Server
9 Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
10 Adobe Illustrator 11
See more by this manufacturer
Microsoft
Symantec
Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $550.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!
!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 43 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $200.00
OurPrice: $49.95
YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 40 reviews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
   by Adobe

ListPrice: $599.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 35 reviews)
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F94C.D49FCB80-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 02:58:13 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjBEj-0002s7-MR for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:58:13 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12886 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 02:57:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjBC3-0002Xh-Mp; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:55:27 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjBC1-0002Xb-10 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 02:55:25 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA12596 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 02:54:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjBXC-0006Gi-H5 for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 03:17:22 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1010:d839:6d12:1633:3eb2]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6F51521A; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:54:55 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:54:53 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Soliman, Hesham" In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 10ba05e7e8a9aa6adb025f426bef3a30 Cc: IPv6 WG Subject: Re: Fwd: Request To Advance: X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:42:02 -0500, >>>>> "Soliman, Hesham" said: > => Agreed. In addition to Appendix C, we also agreed on the list to add a paragraph to > section 7.2 (text from Greg Daley) to clarify the general > handling. This was also added. OK so far. > So, the change to APPENDIX C should cover the >> case of >> >> - an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO >> - the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for the >> source/target >> >> for RA, RS, NS and redirect. >> >> That's why I made this comment. Again, if the source of the >> change to >> 05 is different than this discussion, please specify a pointer to the >> real source. > => Your comment seemed to indicate that the non-existence of the cache entry > was a separate issue, but I don't think it is. The reception of an ND message without > the SLLAO is only a problem if no entry existed. In other words, we wouldn't have > registered this issue from the beginning if it were related to cases where the receiving > node already had an entry. Yes, that's correct. Perhaps I was not clear in my previous message, but I actually meant: the change to APPENDIX C should cover the case of an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO, AND the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for the source/target (there are two conditions for a single 'case') Is this now clear and does that match your (our) understanding? Then, let's revisit the change to APPENDIX C in 2461bis-05. My point of the first message of this thread is that the change does not cover cases where a neighbor cache entry does not exist when the unsolicited message arrives (see the diff I attached to a previous message http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05861.html). More specifically, I'd like to see new entries like: State Event Action New state - RS, no link-layer - - address ...hmm..., perhaps your intent was that such cases should be covered new entries like this one: INCOMPLETE NS, RS No link-layer - unchanged address If so, I see your position, but I don't think this is 100% correct, because the 'non-existent' entry cannot be in any state (INCOMPLETE in this case). I believe using '-' for the 'State' field in these cases should make more sense. > If you only mean: "Add the case for REDIRECT received without SLLAO" that's ok with me. Yes, that's my point. >> If you really want to treat the two cases separately in APPENDIX C, I >> don't necessarily object to that particular decision. However, the >> decision should at least be consistent throughout the appendix. > => Good points. I agree with that. So to keep it consistent, I'll remove this distinction > between host and router. Okay, but please clarify my first question, too: >> First of all, which part of the main text specifies this behavior? As >> far as I can see, the only text that explicitly mentions ICMPv6 >> destination unreachable error to be sent is in Section 7.2.2, where >> the error is sent upon retransmit timeout for NS messages (which is >> clearly a different scenario than this one). Thanks, JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 04:39:02 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCoI-00085P-Fm for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:39:02 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA22432 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:38:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCjZ-00075M-63; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:34:09 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCjX-00075C-OR for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:34:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA21843 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:33:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from 63-197-255-154.ded.pacbell.net ([63.197.255.154] helo=sinett.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjD4n-0001QZ-64 for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:56:06 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 01:38:30 -0800 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Fragment Header Thread-Index: AcXw8lxBeAfl+TOPRgGsitXQwZXcvgIjJpzg From: "Vishwas Manral" To: "Radhakrishnan.S" , X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Fragment Header X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Radhakrishnan, I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a = fragment. The document for SIIT RFC2765, in Section 3 states that: - "Also, when the IPv4 sender does not perform path MTU discovery the = translator MUST always include an IPv6 fragment header to indicate that = the sender allows fragmentation. That is needed should the packet pass = through an IPv6-to-IPv4 translator." That is why I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it = is a fragment. It just signals the equivalent of the DF bit in case the = packet is translated to IPv4. Thanks, Vishwas ________________________________________ From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Radhakrishnan.S Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 7:32 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Fragment Header That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and = both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated? =3D> The one and only fragment.=A0 :-) Doesnt make sense unless u want = to test the reassembling capability of the receiver of the fragments. = The presence of a fragment header is used in NAT-PT IPv4->IPv6 to = indicate that the packet is fragmentable. (case where DF bit is NOT set = in IPv4 header). Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? = Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would = distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment. =3D> M flag is used to distinguish last frag from others!!!! Its used = for identifying the last frag when computing the length during = reassembly.=20 Vishwas Manral wrote:=20 Hi folks, =A0 I have a doubt regarding the fragment header. Why do we need the M flag = in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header = itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the = first fragment and a non-fragment. =A0 In IPv4 we did not have a fragment header, so the M flag was logical to = have for distinguishing the first and a non fragment. =A0 That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and = both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated? =A0 Thanks, Vishwas =A0 =A0=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 04:44:24 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCtS-0001FS-N4 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:44:24 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA23050 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:43:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCqI-0000Vh-Pf; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:41:06 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCqH-0000Vc-1b for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:41:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA22711 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:40:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from web61116.mail.yahoo.com ([209.73.179.30]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjDBM-0001gJ-2f for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:03:01 -0500 Received: (qmail 80477 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Dec 2005 09:40:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ie; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qQTeicjVqZtjWVrF4r9bZX13YOrsYjR1YOuYvXwo9lb0bD+gPrz66yZlrqU0EBgVF0tAYmlIi9fuOhcOC9wxVGZHerUQf5DUvQpoPWV5yAZmpj/PFnezPnZlRKlm696A3Dj2Tep+5Rde9NhE71T+iBjx0K/uQSmu4X7rkdI9ByA= ; Message-ID: <20051205094038.80475.qmail@web61116.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.166.243.186] by web61116.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:40:38 GMT Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:40:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Doo Timbir To: Vishwas Manral , "Radhakrishnan.S" , ipv6@ietf.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Scan-Signature: cd26b070c2577ac175cd3a6d878c6248 Subject: RE: Fragment Header X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0666426230==" Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org --===============0666426230== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1279347547-1133775638=:59686" --0-1279347547-1133775638=:59686 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Vishwas, It appears our reasoning is in the same direction.I definitely think likewise too! Sincerely, Doo Timbir. Vishwas Manral wrote: Hi Radhakrishnan, I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a fragment. The document for SIIT RFC2765, in Section 3 states that: - "Also, when the IPv4 sender does not perform path MTU discovery the translator MUST always include an IPv6 fragment header to indicate that the sender allows fragmentation. That is needed should the packet pass through an IPv6-to-IPv4 translator." That is why I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a fragment. It just signals the equivalent of the DF bit in case the packet is translated to IPv4. Thanks, Vishwas ________________________________________ From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Radhakrishnan.S Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 7:32 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Fragment Header That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated? => The one and only fragment. :-) Doesnt make sense unless u want to test the reassembling capability of the receiver of the fragments. The presence of a fragment header is used in NAT-PT IPv4->IPv6 to indicate that the packet is fragmentable. (case where DF bit is NOT set in IPv4 header). Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment. => M flag is used to distinguish last frag from others!!!! Its used for identifying the last frag when computing the length during reassembly. Vishwas Manral wrote: Hi folks, I have a doubt regarding the fragment header. Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment. In IPv4 we did not have a fragment header, so the M flag was logical to have for distinguishing the first and a non fragment. That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated? Thanks, Vishwas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Win a Yahoo! Vespa NEW - Yahoo! Cars has 3 Vespa LX125s to be won Enter Now! --0-1279347547-1133775638=:59686 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Vishwas,

It appears our reasoning is in the same direction.I definitely think likewise too!

Sincerely,

Doo Timbir.

Vishwas Manral <Vishwas@sinett.com> wrote:

Hi Radhakrishnan,

I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a fragment. The document for SIIT RFC2765, in Section 3 states that: -

"Also, when the IPv4 sender does not perform path MTU discovery the translator MUST always include an IPv6 fragment header to indicate that the sender allows fragmentation. That is needed should the packet pass through an IPv6-to-IPv4 translator."

That is why I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a fragment. It just signals the equivalent of the DF bit in case the packet is translated to IPv4.

Thanks,
Vishwas
________________________________________
From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Radhakrishnan.S
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 7:32 AM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Fragment Header

That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated?
=> The one and only fragment. :-) Doesnt make sense unless u want to test the reassembling capability of the receiver of the fragments. The presence of a fragment header is used in NAT-PT IPv4->IPv6 to indicate that the packet is fragmentable. (case where DF bit is NOT set in IPv4 header).

Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment.
=> M flag is used to distinguish last frag from others!!!! Its used for ide! ntifying the last frag when computing the length during reassembly.

Vishwas Manral wrote:
Hi folks,

I have a doubt regarding the fragment header. Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment.

In IPv4 we did not have a fragment header, so the M flag was logical to have for distinguishing the first and a non fragment.

That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated?

Thanks,
Vishwas

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Win a Yahoo! Vespa NEW - Yahoo! Cars has 3 Vespa LX125s to be won Enter Now! --0-1279347547-1133775638=:59686-- --===============0666426230== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --===============0666426230==-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 04:50:48 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCzg-0003UI-7g for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:50:48 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA23494 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:49:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCwn-0002es-8v; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:47:49 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjCwg-0002eQ-Ju for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 04:47:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA23284 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:46:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr ([192.44.77.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjDHv-0001vx-UB for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:09:41 -0500 Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [193.52.74.194]) by laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/2003.04.01) with ESMTP id jB59ktk22831; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:46:55 +0100 Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (localhost.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) by givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB59ktrq065388; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:46:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr) Message-Id: <200512050946.jB59ktrq065388@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> From: Francis Dupont To: marcelo bagnulo braun In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:01:57 +0100. <6400a911d7bd8a2b8b3504e60943db67@it.uc3m.es> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:46:55 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) at enst-bretagne.fr X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org In your previous mail you wrote: Comments? => I have some comments: - if the border router for X to A knows the outage it can deprecate the A prefix and propagate the information. Note this idea was described many time but as far as I know is *not* implemented (if such basic idea is not supported I am afraid we'll get no help from routers). Perhaps the document should say something about this, for instance explaining some outages can't be detected so easily... - the document should address as soon as possible the orders between destination and source addresses, i.e., it is S1-D1, S2-D1, S1-D2, S2-D2 or S1-D1, S1-D2, S2-D1, S2-D2? - note that many applications which specify source addresses in fact simply use source addresses returned by the selection mechanism (connect() then getsockname())... - the Rule 0 is not enough accurate: it assumes some state is kept (what state? how? lifetime? etc). IMHO the document has to provide guidelines! - in the Rule 0 the term "unreachable" is not the right one, IMHO it is more "not working for D"? - it is not true that RFC 3484 provides an ordered list of destination address, it only orders the list provided by DNS & co. BTW it should be useful to know when the tail of a list contains unusable addresses or to remove them. - IMHO it should be fine to get a support for address pairs because it is needed for any scheme which replaces the last "longest prefix match" rules by a better thing. I think about NAROS but there should be many similar ideas. - in 3.2.1 there are other transport protocols than TCP and UDP. I prefer connection oriented and connection less. - in 3.2.2 the amount of tried source addresses has to be controlled. IMHO a better mechanism for both TCP and UDP is a new setsockopt() which the N first elements of the source address list. The only issue is this hint can be obsolete when the list changes but when you look at the rules you can see they should give a stable ordering. Of course, it can be used to get the source address list for a destination... Thanks Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 05:11:51 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjDK3-0008Ll-Jy for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:11:51 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA25483 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 05:11:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjDIx-0007w0-F8; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:10:43 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjDIv-0007vI-KC for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:10:41 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA25438 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 05:09:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from cpanel2.interactivedns.com ([67.15.58.78]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjDe5-0002bP-SS for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:32:41 -0500 Received: from [61.95.198.15] (helo=[192.168.1.43]) by cpanel2.interactivedns.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1EjDIF-00033a-M4; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:40:03 +0530 Message-ID: <43941202.9020704@zazunetworks.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:40:10 +0530 From: "S.Radhakrishnan" Organization: ZAZU Networks User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vishwas Manral References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel2.interactivedns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - zazunetworks.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Fragment Header X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yes, right. thats what i meant too. :-) the purpose is only for indication. "the presence of a fragment header is used in NAT-PT IPv4->IPv6 to *indicate that the packet is fragmentable." *the error i made is "NAT-PT IPv4->IPv6" which should have been "NAT-PT IPv6->IPv4". error regretted! :-) regards radhakrishnan* * Vishwas Manral wrote: >Hi Radhakrishnan, > >I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a fragment. The document for SIIT RFC2765, in Section 3 states that: - > >"Also, when the IPv4 sender does not perform path MTU discovery the translator MUST always include an IPv6 fragment header to indicate that the sender allows fragmentation. That is needed should the packet pass through an IPv6-to-IPv4 translator." > >That is why I think that having a fragment header does not mean that it is a fragment. It just signals the equivalent of the DF bit in case the packet is translated to IPv4. > >Thanks, >Vishwas >________________________________________ >From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Radhakrishnan.S >Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 7:32 AM >To: ipv6@ietf.org >Subject: Re: Fragment Header > >That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated? >=> The one and only fragment. :-) Doesnt make sense unless u want to test the reassembling capability of the receiver of the fragments. The presence of a fragment header is used in NAT-PT IPv4->IPv6 to indicate that the packet is fragmentable. (case where DF bit is NOT set in IPv4 header). > >Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment. >=> M flag is used to distinguish last frag from others!!!! Its used for identifying the last frag when computing the length during reassembly. > > > > > >Vishwas Manral wrote: >Hi folks, > >I have a doubt regarding the fragment header. Why do we need the M flag in the "fragment header" at all for IPv6? Having the fragment header itself would tell it's a fragment and would distinguish between the first fragment and a non-fragment. > >In IPv4 we did not have a fragment header, so the M flag was logical to have for distinguishing the first and a non fragment. > >That said; how should the case where we have the fragment header and both the Fragment Offset and the M flag is 0 be treated? > >Thanks, >Vishwas > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From andreas.palladium@besse-demenagement.com Mon Dec 05 05:39:49 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjDl7-0006Ev-IS for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 05:39:49 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA28656 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 05:38:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [221.132.59.106] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjE6L-0003VW-KG for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 06:01:48 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5f986$96270280$0100007f@localhost> From: "William Ross" To: Subject: 0EM Software Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 10:39:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F986.96270280" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F986.96270280 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 48 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 34 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 42 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F986.96270280 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	! Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
		Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 38 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 31 reviews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 48 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5F986.96270280-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 08:39:58 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjGZS-0002Wj-8W for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:39:58 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA19184 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:39:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjGWw-0001yz-Kg; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:37:22 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjGWu-0001yX-SA for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:37:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA18979 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:36:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from rockribhci590.ria.army.mil ([147.216.11.118] helo=ROCKRIBHCI590.nanw.ds.army.mil) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjGsA-0001cK-GG for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:59:21 -0500 Received: by rockribhci590.ria.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:37:05 -0600 Message-ID: <7CD3A8FB1860D443A61E833FDC6E89B409826CAB@rockrib1bn045.ria.army.mil> From: "Martin, Jean K Ms TACOM-RI" To: "'ipv6@ietf.org'" Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:37:00 -0600 Importance: high X-Priority: 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 Cc: "Martin, Jean K Ms TACOM-RI" Subject: FW: unsubcribe X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org -----Original Message----- From: ?? [mailto:wangy@buptnet.edu.cn] Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 8:58 PM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: unsubcribe -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 05 08:50:34 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjGji-0005Nc-Ra for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:50:34 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA20244 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:49:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjGil-00058h-SE; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:49:35 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjGij-00058W-Ja for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:49:33 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA20162 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:48:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from purgatory.unfix.org ([213.136.24.43] ident=postfix) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjH40-000200-KZ for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:11:34 -0500 Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:20d:0:2d0:b7ff:fe8f:5d42] (hell.unfix.org [IPv6:2001:7b8:20d:0:2d0:b7ff:fe8f:5d42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C71E7FAA for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:49:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43944544.6040007@unfix.org> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:48:52 +0100 From: Jeroen Massar Organization: Unfix User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'ipv6@ietf.org'" References: <7CD3A8FB1860D443A61E833FDC6E89B409826CAB@rockrib1bn045.ria.army.mil> In-Reply-To: <7CD3A8FB1860D443A61E833FDC6E89B409826CAB@rockrib1bn045.ria.army.mil> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=333E7C23; url=http://unfix.org/~jeroen/jeroen-unfix.org-pgpkey X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 Subject: [administrative note] How to unsubscribe X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0911208261==" Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============0911208261== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6388D03FCD8278C6FBF17C03" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6388D03FCD8278C6FBF17C03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, It's almost christmas again, autumn has already caused leaves to have fallen of the trees and people turn a bit crazy and want to unsubscribe. Apparently it is really hard to read the footer of every message send to the list, it contains: > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you would go to the above url you can use that to unsubscribe, which was the same page you used to subscribe to the list. Also note that the headers in the emails contain: 8<----------------------------------------------------------------- List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ----------------------------------------------------------------->8 Which *also* describes how to unsubscribe from this list, mailing the above addresses unsubscribes you from the list. And when you are really unable to unsubscribe and need help then send them to the mail address at the bottom of: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 or reply off-list to this message and I'll take a look into it for you. IMHO it is quite odd that in a technical community like the IETF reading is so difficult. Greets, Jeroen --------------enig6388D03FCD8278C6FBF17C03 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Jeroen Massar / http://unfix.org/~jeroen/ iD8DBQFDlEVEKaooUjM+fCMRAv7SAJ99sFuPB8ILOPD/eyGW1g055fPRrwCfTzEM mFYAbuKDSBbrkeJmhs03X/g= =lPYg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6388D03FCD8278C6FBF17C03-- --===============0911208261== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --===============0911208261==-- From aa@ss.com Mon Dec 05 22:59:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjTyq-0000QW-Vd for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 22:59:05 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.186.83.89]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA28007 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 22:58:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512060358.WAA28007@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+LXNvNvXqsjDKHllMi5uZXQp?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:59:00 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�á�

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-85126879��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407

From thegreenfile@basicbanners.com Tue Dec 06 02:34:58 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjXLl-0004DS-Gi for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:34:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA18203 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:34:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pool-70-111-126-151.nwrk.east.verizon.net ([70.111.126.151] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjXhD-000607-1R for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:57:07 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fa35$ef9a3a80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Joshua Mitchell" To: Subject: Software At Low Pr1ce Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 02:34:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FA35.EF9A3A80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FA35.EF9A3A80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 34 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 34 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 47 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FA35.EF9A3A80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
		Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 31 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 39 reviews! )

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 41 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FA35.EF9A3A80-- From aa@ss.com Tue Dec 06 03:00:33 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjXkX-0002CM-2Y for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:00:33 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.186.83.89]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA19934 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:59:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:59:38 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512060759.CAA19934@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?tc2829eqyMO8uLj2vq3TqrK7tO21xM341b6jrL/J1fvM5cLyo6zSsr/J0tS1?= =?GB2312?B?pbbAwvI=?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:00:36 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.1 [cn] ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com)--12�� ݶ��www.ye2.net)--2.5�� ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn)--3�� ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn)--1�� й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com)--15�� ƹ��(www.itsend.com)--8000Ԫ ע�� ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From aa@ss.com Tue Dec 06 04:10:28 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjYqC-0003nv-PU for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 04:10:28 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.186.83.89]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA26196 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 04:09:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512060909.EAA26196@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?xbfSsM34LS26vNbdyfq77tfK0bbN+Cg1MW95ZWEuY29tKQ==?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:10:28 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 ŷҰ��--��Ѷ��

ŷҰ��--��Ѷ��

ŷҰ��Ǽ��֡��һ��ĺ��Ѷ��

��Ż�ȯ��Ż��Ϣ��̼��Ϊ��ģ��ʱ��

��ѹ��ͷ��

ŷҰ�� http://www.51oyea.com

��QQ:1283511

From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Tue Dec 06 14:53:42 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ejisf-0000Nq-RQ for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:53:42 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA14640 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:52:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjiqE-0007Z7-92; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:51:10 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjiqC-0007Z1-K0 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 14:51:08 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA14289 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:50:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es ([163.117.136.121]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjjBk-0007Bq-16 for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:13:24 -0500 Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7719E9E171; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:50:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from [163.117.203.49] (unknown [163.117.203.49]) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D249E158; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:50:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <200512050946.jB59ktrq065388@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> References: <200512050946.jB59ktrq065388@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <309b3c8cd3f23764d9c3dc5a11624d3f@it.uc3m.es> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: marcelo bagnulo braun Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:49:50 +0100 To: Francis Dupont X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1449ead51a2ff026dcb23465f5379250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Francis, thanks for your feedback comments below... El 05/12/2005, a las 10:46, Francis Dupont escribi=F3: > In your previous mail you wrote: > > Comments? > > =3D> I have some comments: > - if the border router for X to A knows the outage it can deprecate > the A prefix and propagate the information. Note this idea was > described many time but as far as I know is *not* implemented > (if such basic idea is not supported I am afraid we'll get > no help from routers). > Perhaps the document should say something about this, for instance > explaining some outages can't be detected so easily... > i agree this is a useful tool for multihomed environments (i have=20 included it in draft-bagnulo-shim6-addr-selection-00.txt) and i agree=20 that this should be detailed in a document related to initiating=20 communications in multihomed environments However, i am not sure if this would belong to a new version of RFC3484=20= which is the goal of this document... > - the document should address as soon as possible the orders between > destination and source addresses, i.e., it is S1-D1, S2-D1, S1-D2, > S2-D2 or S1-D1, S1-D2, S2-D1, S2-D2? > right, this would be the optimal approach, since it would provide an=20 order of address pairs (as opposed to an order of destiantion addresses=20= and for each deatiantion address, an ordered list of source addresses)=20= but the difficulty with this is that current functions do not return=20 address pairs, but destination addresses and source addresses=20 separately. I guess that one option would be to define new function=20 calls that return list of src,dst address pairs, but this wouldn't be=20 compatible with current apps, since they don't use these to-be-defined=20= functions I guess that an option would be to define the two approaches, on one=20 hand the approach to define the list of dest addresses and for each=20 dest address an ordered list of source addresses and the other approach=20= (for updated apps) the returns an ordered list of src,dst address pairs > - note that many applications which specify source addresses in > fact simply use source addresses returned by the selection > mechanism (connect() then getsockname())... > right the idea would be that the src addresses returned are ordered. The=20 difficulty is that this fucntion call does not refers to any specific=20 destiantion address and providing an order independent of the=20 destiantion is of little use imho so, the option would be to define a new function call that returns an=20 ordered list of source address available for a particular destiantion=20 address > - the Rule 0 is not enough accurate: it assumes some state is kept > (what state? how? lifetime? etc). IMHO the document has to > provide guidelines! > agree in draft-bagnulo-shim6-addr-selection-00.txt there is a proposal to use=20= information in incoming packets as hints to determine which address=20 pairs are working. This information is cached and can be used to=20 determine if an address pair is working > - in the Rule 0 the term "unreachable" is not the right one, IMHO > it is more "not working for D"? > agree an alternative would be to talk about working/non-working address pairs > - it is not true that RFC 3484 provides an ordered list of = destination > address, it only orders the list provided by DNS & co. I am not sure i understand the difference here... the rationale behind this is that a host wants to communicate with a=20 given host identified by a fqdn It then obtains the list of destiantion addresses for that fqdn from=20 the dns then rfc3484 orders the list provided by the dns so, i would say that rfc3484 returns an ordered list of destiantion=20 addresses... what is the aspect that i am missing here? > BTW it should > be useful to know when the tail of a list contains unusable > addresses or to remove them. > yes this could be an option otoh, an address pair working/non-working status may change over time=20 (and quite fast) so, possibly it may worth trying with address pairs that were not=20 working some minutes ago, if there are no other options (i.e. other=20 options have been tried later and they are not working) so including the addresses that were not working at the end of the list=20= may be of some use > - IMHO it should be fine to get a support for address pairs because > it is needed for any scheme which replaces the last "longest > prefix match" rules by a better thing. I think about NAROS but > there should be many similar ideas. i am not sure i understand this point... > > - in 3.2.1 there are other transport protocols than TCP and UDP. > I prefer connection oriented and connection less. > agree > - in 3.2.2 the amount of tried source addresses has to be controlled. > IMHO a better mechanism for both TCP and UDP is a new setsockopt() > which the N first elements of the source address list. in this case the application would be: - first obtaining the src address list for a given destiantion with a=20 new call setting, and then - it would be setting the list of source addresses to be tried by=20 TCP/UDP using this new option, passing the list (or part of) obtained=20 in the previous point right? This is an interesting middle ground option indeed, where the=20 application does not select a single address (as with bind()) nor it=20 leaves the src address unspecified (which is the actual scenario=20 considered in section 3.2.2) regards, marcelo > The only > issue is this hint can be obsolete when the list changes but > when you look at the rules you can see they should give a stable > ordering. Of course, it can be used to get the source address list > for a destination... > > Thanks > > Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Tue Dec 06 21:10:53 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ejolh-0003FI-M3 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:10:53 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA22082 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:10:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ejokm-0002u2-T5; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:09:56 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ejokl-0002tx-EK for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:09:55 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA22052 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:09:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr ([192.44.77.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejp6N-0002lJ-6A for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:32:15 -0500 Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [193.52.74.194]) by laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/2003.04.01) with ESMTP id jB729dP02182; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 03:09:39 +0100 Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (localhost.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) by givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB729dHY077351; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 03:09:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr) Message-Id: <200512070209.jB729dHY077351@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> From: Francis Dupont To: marcelo bagnulo braun In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 06 Dec 2005 20:49:50 +0100. <309b3c8cd3f23764d9c3dc5a11624d3f@it.uc3m.es> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:09:39 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) at enst-bretagne.fr X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org In your previous mail you wrote: i agree this is a useful tool for multihomed environments (i have included it in draft-bagnulo-shim6-addr-selection-00.txt) and i agree that this should be detailed in a document related to initiating communications in multihomed environments However, i am not sure if this would belong to a new version of RFC3484 which is the goal of this document... => to be complete the document in its introduction should explain there are some cases without solutions so should list the possible solutions to find cases where none applies. This is the way I'll quickly explain the deprectation of prefixes from broken ISPs. > - the document should address as soon as possible the orders between > destination and source addresses, i.e., it is S1-D1, S2-D1, S1-D2, > S2-D2 or S1-D1, S1-D2, S2-D1, S2-D2? > right, this would be the optimal approach, since it would provide an => note I didn't ask for a solution but for the set out of the problem (it seems I was not clear enough, I apologize). order of address pairs (as opposed to an order of destiantion addresses and for each deatiantion address, an ordered list of source addresses) but the difficulty with this is that current functions do not return address pairs, but destination addresses and source addresses separately. I guess that one option would be to define new function calls that return list of src,dst address pairs, but this wouldn't be compatible with current apps, since they don't use these to-be-defined functions => this can be easily done by a middleware (aka bump in the API), including the very special one named the shim6 layer... I guess that an option would be to define the two approaches, on one hand the approach to define the list of dest addresses and for each dest address an ordered list of source addresses and the other approach (for updated apps) the returns an ordered list of src,dst address pairs => I don't believe in updated apps: we have to support this idea but we have more to never rely on it! > - note that many applications which specify source addresses in > fact simply use source addresses returned by the selection > mechanism (connect() then getsockname())... right the idea would be that the src addresses returned are ordered. The difficulty is that this fucntion call does not refers to any specific destiantion address => in the common mechanism I describe the destination is clearly taken into account (it is the argument of connect()). and providing an order independent of the destiantion is of little use imho so, the option would be to define a new function call that returns an ordered list of source address available for a particular destiantion address => a function or a simpler mechanism. > - the Rule 0 is not enough accurate: it assumes some state is kept > (what state? how? lifetime? etc). IMHO the document has to > provide guidelines! agree in draft-bagnulo-shim6-addr-selection-00.txt there is a proposal to use information in incoming packets as hints to determine which address pairs are working. This information is cached and can be used to determine if an address pair is working => so you have to cite this document and even to explain how to use its ideas outside the shim6 context. > - in the Rule 0 the term "unreachable" is not the right one, IMHO > it is more "not working for D"? > agree an alternative would be to talk about working/non-working address pairs => you can't talk about an address pair in a function about an argument: you have to find a better wording. > - it is not true that RFC 3484 provides an ordered list of destination > address, it only orders the list provided by DNS & co. I am not sure i understand the difference here... => it does not create the destination address list. BTW it is just a wording issue. the rationale behind this is that a host wants to communicate with a given host identified by a fqdn It then obtains the list of destiantion addresses for that fqdn from the dns then rfc3484 orders the list provided by the dns so, i would say that rfc3484 returns an ordered list of destiantion addresses... what is the aspect that i am missing here? => a function is not defined by its return value but by its return value in function of its arguments (this is why it is named "function"). Sorry but I began in functional programming and I do important differences for things which can be considered as details, like "(f x) y" is not the same than "f (x,y)" cf a previous comment. > BTW it should > be useful to know when the tail of a list contains unusable > addresses or to remove them. yes this could be an option otoh, an address pair working/non-working status may change over time (and quite fast) so, possibly it may worth trying with address pairs that were not working some minutes ago, if there are no other options (i.e. other options have been tried later and they are not working) so including the addresses that were not working at the end of the list may be of some use => a good alternative is to provide a reliability judgement so a clever implementation can adapt its strategy in looking for a working pair (I think about a sorting on address pairs). > - IMHO it should be fine to get a support for address pairs because > it is needed for any scheme which replaces the last "longest > prefix match" rules by a better thing. I think about NAROS but > there should be many similar ideas. i am not sure i understand this point... => look at draft-de-launois-multi6-naros-00.txt or read Cedric's PhD document. To apply this kind of ideas you both have to replace last rules and to give address pairs to the application. So to be able to handle address pairs is an important goal in a larger scope than this I-D. > - in 3.2.2 the amount of tried source addresses has to be controlled. > IMHO a better mechanism for both TCP and UDP is a new setsockopt() > which the N first elements of the source address list. in this case the application would be: - first obtaining the src address list for a given destiantion with a new call setting, and then => no, I don't see why this step is useful. Even the src address list length is not important. - it would be setting the list of source addresses to be tried by TCP/UDP using this new option, passing the list (or part of) obtained in the previous point right? => you didn't understand my idea. In place to handle in the application the source address list per destination you just specify the destination and the number of the item of the source address list. Of course you can get by connect() then getsockname() the source address but you don't need to do this. This is an interesting middle ground option indeed, where the application does not select a single address (as with bind()) nor it leaves the src address unspecified (which is the actual scenario considered in section 3.2.2) => the idea is to replace the bind() by a simpler setsockopt() with a counter. Thanks Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From amylynnpoeppelman@aradsalt.com Wed Dec 07 04:20:48 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjvTk-0007qf-Gm for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 04:20:48 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA06403 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:19:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from [193.27.41.14] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjvpP-0007xZ-C6 for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 04:43:12 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fb0d$f85e3f80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Walter Hernandez" To: Subject: Photoshop, Windows, Office Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 12:20:30 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FB0D.F85E3F80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FB0D.F85E3F80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 31 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 47 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 37 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FB0D.F85E3F80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
		Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!
!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 48 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 47 reviews)!

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 32 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FB0D.F85E3F80-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 07 05:09:06 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjwEU-0002oj-8B for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:09:06 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA10895 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:08:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjwCA-0002UF-9X; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:06:42 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjwC8-0002Tp-Or for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:06:40 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA10624 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:05:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from a.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.81.51] helo=smtp.aaisp.net.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjwXl-0000tE-JH for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:29:05 -0500 Received: from 247.254.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.254.247] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp.aaisp.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1EjwBi-00026n-2G; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:06:14 +0000 Message-ID: <4396B488.2050406@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:08:08 +0000 From: Elwyn Davies User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Haberman References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: IPv6 WG Subject: Re: Resolution to open comments on ICMP Name Lookups X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi. Sorry for the silence.. I have been on an extended holiday jaunt and am just catching up. As one of those who commented on the current version, just to say that I am happy with the proposed resolution, but it is probably appropriate to add a security note as proposed by Jeroen Massar as regards the tunnel endpoint enquiry. Regards, Elwyn Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > As promised during the IPv6 WG session in Vancouver, this is > my attempt to resolve the open issues with the ICMP Name Lookup > draft. From my review of my e-mail and the mailing list archive, there > are three open issues on the table. I will list each and propose a > resolution to each. > > I will accept comments on these changes until 5:00pm on 12/2/05. > After that, I will incorporate the changes and submit the draft. > > > Issue 1: Restrict operation of the protocol to link-local use. > > Resolution: > The consensus is to retain the more flexible multi-hop capability. > An additional sentence or two will be added to the Security > Considerations section recommending the filtering of these > messages at administrative boundaries. > > > Issue 2: Change multicast range used for Queries. > > Resolution: > This change will be made. There will not be a "compatibility" > knob for operation with older implementations. The addition > of such a knob will make operational use too complex. This > should simplify the use, but will require a code change. > > Issue 3: Discovery of tunnel endpoints. > > Resolution: > This change will be made and will be based on the text proposed > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05674.html > > > Regards, > Brian > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From aa@ss.com Wed Dec 07 05:38:47 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjwhC-00025G-SD for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 05:38:47 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.186.83.89]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA14465 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:37:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:37:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512071037.FAA14465@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?KioqKioqKioqtc2829eqyMO8uLj2vq3TqrK7tO21xM341b6jrL/J1fvM5cLy?= =?GB2312?B?o6zSsr/J0tS1pbbAwvIqKioqKioq?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:38:52 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com)--12�� ݶ��www.ye2.net)--2.5�� ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn)--3�� ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn)--1�� й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com)--15�� ƹ��(www.itsend.com)--8000Ԫ ע�� ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From Llaxpe@optonline.net Wed Dec 07 06:16:38 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjxHq-0005VB-Oy; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:16:38 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA19725; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 06:15:46 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512071115.GAA19725@ietf.org> Received: from [222.79.26.234] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjxdT-0003TW-AL; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 06:39:02 -0500 From: "Thad Reed" To: pim-admin@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Information Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:14:28 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_GJIBTYYH.WSKJKUFE" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_GJIBTYYH.WSKJKUFE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your position has been discussed to the obligatory agencies, and upon meticulous deliberation, we are able to proffer to you the next opening offer. Based upon meticulous deliberation you certify to obtain a sizable rebate on your initial property investment. By completing the next attached form in a timely manner we will be able to complete our estimation, and we feel certain you will obtain not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will carry out all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to complete this period of the arrangement. With kind regards, Thad Reed Should you prefer not to benefit of this holiday opening offer you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_GJIBTYYH.WSKJKUFE Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your position has been discussed to the obligatory agencies, and upon meticulous deliberation, we are able to proffer to you the next opening offer.

Based upon meticulous deliberation you certify to obtain a sizable rebate on your initial property investment.

By completing the next attached form in a timely manner we will be able to complete our estimation, and we feel certain you will obtain not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will carry out all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to complete this period of the arrangement.

With kind regards,

Thad Reed

Should you prefer not to benefit of this holiday opening offer you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_GJIBTYYH.WSKJKUFE-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 07 13:19:09 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ek3sj-0007bJ-6e for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:19:09 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08769 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:18:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ek3sJ-0007Vm-UQ; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:18:43 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ek3sI-0007Vh-0g for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:18:42 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08742 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:17:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.flarion.com ([63.103.94.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek4Dy-0001aW-DI for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:41:07 -0500 Received: from ftmailserver.flariontech.com ([10.10.1.140]) by mail.flarion.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:18:27 -0500 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:18:28 -0500 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Fwd: Request To Advance: Thread-Index: AcX5cS8rJtERXep6ScK2qdyLAZlWewB6GaPA From: "Soliman, Hesham" To: "JINMEI Tatuya / ????" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2005 18:18:27.0591 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E91C970:01C5FB5A] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 386e0819b1192672467565a524848168 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: IPv6 WG Subject: RE: Fwd: Request To Advance: X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > the change to APPENDIX C should cover the case of > an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO, > AND the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for > the source/target > (there are two conditions for a single 'case') >=20 > Is this now clear and does that match your (our) understanding? =3D> Yes. Except I didn't explicitly include the case where no entry = exists at all. >=20 > Then, let's revisit the change to APPENDIX C in 2461bis-05. My point > of the first message of this thread is that the change does not cover > cases where a neighbor cache entry does not exist when the=20 > unsolicited > message arrives (see the diff I attached to a previous message > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg05861.html). >=20 > More specifically, I'd like to see new entries like: >=20 > State Event Action =20 > New state >=20 > - RS, no link-layer - - > address >=20 > ...hmm..., perhaps your intent was that such cases should be covered > new entries like this one: >=20 > INCOMPLETE NS, RS No link-layer - =20 > unchanged > address =3D> Exactly. >=20 > If so, I see your position, but I don't think this is 100% correct, > because the 'non-existent' entry cannot be in any state=20 > (INCOMPLETE in > this case). I believe using '-' for the 'State' field in these cases > should make more sense. =3D> Ok. This can be added.=20 > > =3D> Good points. I agree with that. So to keep it=20 > consistent, I'll remove this distinction > > between host and router.=20 >=20 > Okay, but please clarify my first question, too: >=20 > >> First of all, which part of the main text specifies this=20 > behavior? As > >> far as I can see, the only text that explicitly mentions ICMPv6 > >> destination unreachable error to be sent is in Section=20 > 7.2.2, where > >> the error is sent upon retransmit timeout for NS messages=20 > (which is > >> clearly a different scenario than this one). =3D> This can be added to the text at the beginning of 7.2., which = discusses this issues.=20 Hesham >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > JINMEI, Tatuya > Communication Platform Lab. > Corporate R&D Center,=20 > Toshiba Corp. > jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp >=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole = use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is = strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the = sender and delete all copies. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From Bxuki@optonline.net Wed Dec 07 18:04:45 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ek8L7-0003Xp-EL; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:04:45 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14172; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 18:03:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ek8gr-0004lS-FL; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:27:16 -0500 Received: from e182031067.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.182.31.67] helo=lh) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ek8L1-0005nk-QA; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:04:40 -0500 From: "Luther Wilder" To: pim-admin@ietf.org Subject: Re: Our last email Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:59:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_EJEWZJWF.OYPKEHJS" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EJEWZJWF.OYPKEHJS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your current case has been considered to the specific peoples, and upon prudent contemplation, we are able to proffer to you the following offer. Based upon prudent contemplation you meet the criteria to obtain a generous rebate on your original property investment. By completing the following attached form in a timely manner we will be able to decide our assessment, and we feel positive you will obtain not only a decreased rate of interest, but also a cash return that will complete all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to decide this part of the treaty. Hoping on the best for you all. Luther Wilder Should you prefer not to take advantage of this holiday offer you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EJEWZJWF.OYPKEHJS Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your current case has been considered to the specific peoples, and upon prudent contemplation, we are able to proffer to you the following offer.

Based upon prudent contemplation you meet the criteria to obtain a generous rebate on your original property investment.

By completing the following attached form in a timely manner we will be able to decide our assessment, and we feel positive you will obtain not only a decreased rate of interest, but also a cash return that will complete all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to decide this part of the treaty.

Hoping on the best for you all.

Luther Wilder

Should you prefer not to take advantage of this holiday offer you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_EJEWZJWF.OYPKEHJS-- From aa@ss.com Wed Dec 07 20:52:07 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkAx4-0005YG-Ue for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 20:52:06 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.186.83.89]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA07935 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:51:13 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512080151.UAA07935@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+LXNvNvXqsjDKHllMi5uZXQp?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:07 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�á�

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-85126879��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407��1283511

From dfsfds@sina.com Wed Dec 07 21:50:33 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkBrd-0001cz-GP for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 21:50:33 -0500 Received: from sina.com ([222.38.127.50]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA13413 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:49:37 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512080249.VAA13413@ietf.org> From: "dfsfds@sina.com" Subject: =?GB2312?B?d3d3LnRzZmN6eC5jb222/srW?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: dfsfds@sina.com Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:52:16 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] www.tsfczx.com/ershou ��Ϣ��ģ� From ryan_panos@blacksheepservices.com Thu Dec 08 01:17:20 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkF5k-0005Aq-3u for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:17:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA01243 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 01:16:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from [217.147.22.246] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkFRY-00037p-0q for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 01:39:54 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fbe8$e4d3d700$0100007f@localhost> From: "Bradley Carter" To: Subject: Buy OEM Software Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:22:24 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FBE8.E4D3D700" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FBE8.E4D3D700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 35 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 33 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 42 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FBE8.E4D3D700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	! Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
	! ;	Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download! !

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 45 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 42 revi! ews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 33 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FBE8.E4D3D700-- From luara.r.higgins@assurancedurand.com Thu Dec 08 06:06:57 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkJc1-0005B1-OE for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:06:57 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA29737 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:06:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [81.195.159.154] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkJxs-0003Z0-N9 for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:29:34 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fc11$8a9b3c00$0100007f@localhost> From: "Ali Bennett" To: Subject: What IS 0EM Software And Why D0 You Care? Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:06:56 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC11.8A9B3C00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC11.8A9B3C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 44 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 44 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 48 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC11.8A9B3C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	! Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
	! ;	Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download! !

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 46 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 45 revi! ews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 41 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC11.8A9B3C00-- From 79harrison@access-one.com Thu Dec 08 13:46:46 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkQn0-0000fF-HE for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:46:46 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA23082 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:45:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkQn2-0003sY-Ov for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:46:49 -0500 Received: from dslb-084-058-017-046.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.58.17.46] helo=84.58.17.46) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EkQmx-00045V-Mv for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:46:45 -0500 Message-ID: <64a701c5fc26$e11a0c38$1900e41b@access-one.com> From: "Steven A. Norman" <79harrison@access-one.com> To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Copies of swiss watches Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:39:27 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_8C158233.4ED16CD8" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express V6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_8C158233.4ED16CD8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0001_63A52D86.D48FF066" ------=_NextPart_001_0001_63A52D86.D48FF066 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit EXACT COPIES OF SWISS WATCHES - exact copies of the original watches - perfect as a gift for your colleagues and friends - free gift box Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega Cartier, Bvlgari, Franck Muller .. and 15 other most famous manufacturers. http://www.snappier.net All copies are for only $239.95 - $279.95! ________________________________ To change your mail preferences, go here ________________________________ ------=_NextPart_001_0001_63A52D86.D48FF066 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

EXACT COPIES OF SWISS WATCHES

- exact copies of the original watches
- perfect as a gift for your colleagues and friends
- free gift box

Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega
Cartier, Bvlgari, Franck Muller

.. and 15 other most famous manufacturers.

http://www.snappier.net

All copies are for only $239.95 - $279.95!

________________________________
To change your mail preferences, go here
________________________________

------=_NextPart_001_0001_63A52D86.D48FF066-- ------=_NextPart_000_0000_8C158233.4ED16CD8-- From extreme66usa@acs-inc.com Thu Dec 08 14:48:34 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkRkk-0004ko-M5; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:48:34 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA02670; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:47:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkRkk-0006tW-Sq; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:48:31 -0500 Received: from 20132178244.user.veloxzone.com.br ([201.32.178.244]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EkRka-0005HE-D9; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:48:21 -0500 Received: by 10.11.98.9 with HTTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:48:05 -0600 Message-ID: <017p082e.6438001@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:48:05 -0600 From: "Freddy Pitts" User-Agent: Apple Mail (2.728) X-PGP-Key: P2qcQi0xqEZATrndCYNuHbrWp5hUgltFlVOe57zcPqZXLARHe78vve4IDbueBrBh== X-Load: 22% MIME-Version: 1.0 To: in@ietf.org Cc: ing@ietf.org, ing-admin@ietf.org, internet-drafts@ietf.org, internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Pre-approved Application #3436022 Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:48:05 -0600 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------AttPart_07118698==.OLA" X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Scan-Signature: 0e9ebc0cbd700a87c0637ad0e2c91610 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AttPart_07118698==.OLA Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

see soak try beplaster try confirmation or suez it's pyroxene it's moiseyev ! wolff and macrame on aboveboard on percussion it's curdle or byronic be polecat the dispute Or maybe not

--------------AttPart_07118698==.OLA Content-Type: image/gif; name="upbring.6.gif" Content-ID: <1.0.0.93.0.09915966366997.80007011@hatteras.hotmail.com.8> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="upbring.6.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlh5gHOAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zZv8zM/8AM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZzJmZ mZlmzGZmzGZmZmYzzDMzMzMAzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAADmAc4AAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrfIalKw2K9FCINkEaVuCSMpeVPc8SmjZIrBXDMButxI5BdLWSxoidncUVoWG h4iJQglgeV8Uf10UDQ2SdHVrJWEklZCAJ3ZwAHKfbnuPWYBYX41fEpGpgVmsWgmMkLSiiru8 vb67kCOUAG6fAFwkbpejsyXFKqGchCKvy3KMfMSTwtqlwSRdn3sj37/m5+jpRuVt29TIIspj cs7uKWmysstxew10z8ncgTnxR8S4QMbUKVzIsCGLb2DEAGTWiNylgeECJjyxJ2Odaa9QsJsY z93BEv4M/2Yb6LCly5fpBpU0hvEghUvjsIgiyRFCgoxYqOka0UVjPXHZ7t0RNhSm06dQl+Ci 120Ey4w3+d0xxtPEOFMJggIoSnCnvZkGm45xRHZs1qhw48r98a1BtoksTWGhM9VMua6astkR C2ajSqOI23LKdtBuG8NzI0uevIId2nfCajHjuqmqipN6ZL21epYnwIrJCh5L6kYt5dewJ1v+ yObnNNG2sqBhg4WmhGU6wel+d9B2UlnHaRP1JFoc7y58KsWeTj3uFmOCbl4nbapz90mD2GUX TkIPPtLNRG+yvdVgeDFd9lWfT18dK599WI1iZW3/l/L83ffFRtj895gJ94HCCv9XCeYHQUIC fvEPZPVVaOGFGGao4YYcdujhhyCGKOKIJJZo4okopqjiiiy26OKLMOKgWokGplBjEj9RWMhP 8sUYRXd2caGFe67pEAuNJxGUJBJHKgKWjzvWddNeJfXowoyf6biEdL7caNVKyTGpZRXy3IAl lDlQOZYrwoQJw5lqjJkEl714GQeYTcB5SJk26IlmDW4IBsklv60QloxyxnAoDG7W2eiXeSaq wqM+8CkEpTJg2iFLx8DBCAt+vinpC6GCUqQidpahaRClsuDGEZYC8aoOdJZ42m2FsreRIGfo lFWhH5Ujh0epxcIesD8Nq16vXPwjiT9bhFVbHvAwM07/UnagQokkK21jigndhZUKMoOZ8axV nxhoG7DCfbNuWIAMa1i41PhVnCSFFqYNSFoYU8uQggDy7WayxBcQHQG79Ucs1VJDh7lHSjKJ rgXfRDF7uWlWYkhuCcxGQTyWoJoko3QiBpf/mXFZG4VWI9CUxuZBTSkfewxfr7wFMxgxMlOp r1VsmFGJRByrNusYd45yRo71Kn1yVj//F3KtdQj8Kx/fyvzRRtMYyHFht8LnTUngejuJGURH hysgJD94sNM8+7QNl5YanMlHZM/MM3slg/ybyj2f6mFvdg3k9ndnjYWdKFAvNdqZN9YK8m0q K95HLF7SSTflzIpReTts25XQ/69jI5iJPBxDnZQ7qv2X3WiBXLNaN0crbfo3M+Yheeh51w40 JsdcEtTRqlFdZfCZ7ffRyWG+NWNWsyKuSm1bhXKy4B5C8lsx1KswY62qa2IM5Mftrg1TeldV UOZwbI4+e4k7fcaNpOcjcnRBP5gHNkmn3zr+KagEILLCK20ITxeBS99+zFe8afhuJm6zx6uI 9wnjGfAYnDHgJH4DO4PQ4XkSceBt0Hc+Z9DDgiNaxTvGV6hhgANbjFOFt85Qja2hZG7ayVkI f7emQCwtJziUFgmPprIHaqIgKrQd3BRzQY6B5UnKM8gntFbEg7BLeb2JIlFyhSXUfYx6udHh EkXYo//gEKyHz0iiBZ/xM629Yn5LkmLT5FimGg6DTnasBLOAp6K31IpiN9wDveSgtkHxLBXQ CSQXm+WeiZFrFutSofX2xUHd9MsUlWxY8pblLE8MZzkL++Ico0GKUAjikFfc1yOC1K9DNgmU wYEEI12JrDXY4R2pxCB6QJMKMMitM8vZhh5YQ8AOWutByCCFwmxxLnpRDF8hNOSf6PM8w7hQ IWJRYhWwN81uVuEgEalHQ6iULCukypvo3BE0TaA1hgzTCrFKpzznSc962vOe+MynPvfJz376 858aEuAPyukEgf7AoEpalazaCVASjecYrZTBznpgCoUCYaI9wKjI7qaEijb/1ES3kJI0FUWs HdzCogMt6Q46ARnpoNQHvmwIQz96BDO2xgZZpMtLfZBTnsavh1CI4zkCBaWd9sComeBYDXra A6EigakscFsLoHqYoBr1BVKdQVZZkJIYGRFWI3yTLK30Aqoa6aor/SkKAAOKnzo1CW/FAVtd pdYQ6RGRTUpYHN4IP0o0q5DAetanCAmuV2wDX8SZ2LkMldc3eG44r6yYNNnDh35FA7FeMexJ MOuWcrwxslqZ1pFyqtdjdVY3pcVX4rLjE4mxEJg+5IIMf3UvjpLjLq7tLGIt28pnkiE1p+NW YgkxLPkwjRmcRY9mW3skysbDsMwaaRVkpy+fcbGy/8HYnghl+JuaKTE+XkuIHcLyIKvtUG8h W0FbdOIXnHUtftlCzSv8covthQM6MdXEKZqB33H0F7v77WBrMjJfoJgtD0VpDSlaAS0ET2MW fiFQK4xDiu78rCQBZmYxAWuwebxDWzrpBB8awd6iQCcYDJaG9m5S4MbpbhWoGcNhuRDhQPp1 gw5mm4PFteIBx/UJ7vMg8uw3o+gFkRjKrJzM7qCL2rHyvNKLKq7aJ8ztmiCnZIEYbcOIuLDO ThuZ/NdSUAPV79w4DVk0z9mg55NbXYe08SNqT4tSkY1wSs5v+Up1vaK28RGiKJJc83Uk9sN5 7VnLIZziHfZRXbIQFQ0DRP/mFkasWVvsedKHCDLyJAiSDCYWa4e1GiPrejSBQk+EMeDUX6q8 ssyki1+GfVqsFTwgPm+R1g/CNVJarZV+nKLWaf61T8IJOn7c5xYIizMQafJgN3FqdmoqjlqX TZqtWQLFwtZwGAAzkTUYDCB9CdOtbssR8Pj1PmzrsWeCNZspaLrKU8xGO+so3h8CsDy5Sk6Z XGe2D7YwXo9qSyI7RjCV2pAZYsiu89ITi2ySo4XjaDghJJ4WXhNOkIZUWaA/hkxmcVBQHNcJ fJQNaiR+o90i/4jaRuwuod60NdwlTidwyPFBxefR9VgdDU8t76+cadwVvzIyWuO5Myg8hHcZ lG7/6O1DJnSnsxR7J7tBCT/7elLS6SGsfs2233RbXSAUita+8PG6JXlBEF2ebWYi2g48qAeH rQyNcNeOObGngdDDzZhu8H7a8zQSjmLXg3wk1nImn5adQ1Jzsj0ezGC4/TsiGxJEr/Od74QJ XwFTFuJfrZlBzJwQlidYEju8kM/N9ILLa0KD7rTVwu2H0QMqEJKjg5+qJUNCJ3hQrfNzCWwg TD+FS0iBhFejBcVOvDVy/fEXA/Bd7b5w2NKPgrbqe9HVYfeLkSr0y5Au4Ggf+8rPfilch5/w Y1/8ww9+7kURfv7ZhbxSNX4guBGPUaEqZ/NiHTdpyv+l1lVDfYUCvEJW//1XgDbwSQaYgAZ4 TQrYgA74gBAYgRI4gRRYgRZ4geiQXuBgf06HVjhCehm1f3yUURyIKh7IIYLAGJpEBFBEDv8X BXpVHhfRMO9yAjX4XCN1gwiigVfQbgLogzYgL+ykYuy3gqonVKdHIrYBDiJoUsb0gkD2N76j JodzL4dUWFfIM1n4E1mIEiUYA5tDgCOoA69ACY5RHrfhGDd1fWA2BanSKiDyaFy4BPEEh07w B59SD8ZkILXHE30oTP8AiLw2FmKIA2G4AihUA1NiTZ9EZfCRGYVoBG/4hRmSRblkBHX4hYsy BBJyeWpSHuKAb5ogiiOkMqU4FMYUgrlXHiS0A/+TwIA8Ixbgoz8epnqQwk6UmCG+lItyZUx2 iItFgEnIN2Tg8FzSkBrSMIf6UIT1EIk4NRRHU2pNyFWzNDOzcoZ3go1apAR0kiq1xyIncSyy 9g7ygXa09FiidjzWYnCCxXJApEniuDPNsljmkkuaN4cd5EIOt48j1Bv9CB7HSHeEkFq2FSyL lI/Tklifty04CF+MhEnGtVhq2DXHYQY38jmiYY/QNXPCE1E/sU6Vp2U04YwgYjQvU3QWgRJL sz8naTklJA+V44cfcxPh5ZKIERFaowx+g0mECC5ywzZ8oY3Y0o/MyBT7uDCc0GRQc116oYxa aDmAkxzSMTDRmIbexYP/c1gQLNlSfsVMVcImX4KRN5KVG3E3NZRlTJkeHNONEPcwL1I8ooBE cNBBZ8FApSMPj2NnHDd5yAAnu8NG0LIdoTJYWHceXbVu2jgR72cPi4kd+pYVoyEWqRhSs5VK QVaV79Met1d30iUMoaNmr1iKfgWKJgRacGk/kflgydZ0/aNLMXKaRDE9KTkG9baBLikWeDk+ BOJYrhmbVxaX8bIHoOdlgzliyTEamxh0JXNE6NIpzSksu5lwnmZMz2A0VDFEqJY3wPNV6lNB +eWFvfmS9mAx47kM1WkYsDkrnCZkJdSNSfGLJJKTUvI06IgGN7OG1jVyaGFHq6ULaINkQBUQ /2KkF0JxMmzjJhODTPswGtgiQ/e2ljmRM/cmSdDYOPEmRyqpDXwQEg6XekYWiMl2n7aXmZVl nKkBL0qlnfrCh8IklfbGToIhRm3EGBU0De5JDlNEktkDD+IYTASKhobUo6h0S4L1LAP3dt3S GOnBMtX4ORRzSoHUmUNmHlQ2WX5UjZOUkfIRd/igeUy6MPZyReFyLmswcguzbYv1pavAm0Da mbXjpetYWFdHhE+nGVInXLUgjMkUC5eIgWt1pToqK42Siox1IrConX46GQCRok2Qh2TIi9Vx qIlKHQM4qZZ6qZiaqZq6qZzaqZ76qaAKqgFAAAPgA6Naqk4gAAUgAP8FmIgMYRuBCiBQ4aou MAAHcKu3agCsygIBcKuougO9egC/GgMFgKu3uqoyIAC3uqtHEADFegDMKgLKaqwHUADD6gPK GgC7YEZO0Vqx+mFPwa0wYA8CQADVOgDmCq28aqvXigMBwK4i0KvRugKqegCk+qzaCgPlqq5I 8K62agAlMKrnOgC2egAGkK/Yyq+KQKvq4ELx1AJJ6BAMyxHL0KuoqqztigLC+gMbCwDKOq/0 yq+2CrIs8LFMUAAFcAIdKwLmmrI/IK+8MLHogCyEugLnNE7TSIwi0LEm2wIrywMr+6sCkLEl 0LO2irAv0LNJoLQk8LMAYK4kmwMHkK8uqwP/Q0sCVbtUOStR33oDNYtVJ4gDFamKU4UTJkCt BYC0KuC0OsC2AGCtJUutBDADTHsEcKuy12qxQLCrAwCwO3C3ANC3hri1MfC1A2W4LXCzwWiV ZPsQZlsC9kqwxeqy06qwBVusGVuvG+uskwsAzrqsI3C5PHuwgWusaksCGEuwBmCvInC5+SoA BvCsaSut0Fq5AcC51Tqt2oq50loA6aqr8ZquBFC5BaurWQu57Rq7rYurQru6wPu5Iluttzq3 qGus89q3z4quvhq6x6qtBbus1vu00zsCBFAABkC6pqJcXiePI2FYlflYzUBYGOMMi/WRcKcL 48GF/XJJZZqRp5cs/9UipElppM21WK4VLTdYj4TiSdsgW7JUDpP0TkMRtNBqsdgrApirve2q rKQKvtVqrpyrvayaweZaqrrrsbE7AFFLu8xarAEAuwS7sZervdT7sbZqrdPqu1MLwihswrka w1MbACm8rJhbrypMtADAtr4rvvfKur16rwBbwtX6ttM7AMUarapqAARbAsLbt+e6uqwKw/AK uzicxVtcwuwarMKqsBkKVL2RRmC0duRFluwZXlEpMk8TLOSFMo8ZTeQ4NFODMx8klTEDaq9m DZtQXb+SxyXER4EMUTTUe3MDRuQ0Q+nDoGf7qxbrr87ruSurxJQ7AO+qrgJQub6qtztbqv8C m69aHLfM+rHlWrAmzMNv67eVu6ujHMYeO7Ui0MoCu6s2zMvv+sKsW76eu8JOu8krC8Lfu6zp OsVZHK9OK7gmEM27rK0mG8vbCwCt3Lp+q8a5GrgGMLcrPJWniEUE9JibaRJ8gQdZmpTDQURL 8TaNbEavc1zbqKI4Y5tJqZ1+RDL1nDNipyf8xjwjqC7KpLOZPALyKsTCar67zKxsq7wkALO7 TLAEW8oKy7O8zM1IPAJKm63T2rcX29HUrKyTm68Wfc29XNK4DK1HWwJX7LbIWwJHi8rXzK4Y fbvPysvU7NE27bcmcNLCTMq+2s3dLM7STKoZ3dKI+EMHpEFDI2D/t3Ge7Jk4IVUG2qWij1Im 0QgUCJQUdiKNY3gm71Z0uaGdXGI8eqIMGyQPN2rVCl3RrOu5LmyyEN2rwAuvXCzDworKvTq7 VqzXrMrX2drLVQvR1cyvZFy6t1vXh/20tgytLcuqOI2xpVvDHQvCHLzLKRus34y+AVutr1vC vayuzgqwnf202Pu53ivU4xzUKEDU2qq3N13XFK3UvQy8yorYkHhDInpcb0QRZYMwL+qa/8kI HBpW60NGsuAxzZg3EZEsj/YbWYRz7fA7+ImQ/sw7efHPJSFv8NEow51f2eQ6x+0OTpnE1Ira 7V26uXqsAbu68v2sfvu9pIvf8o2rI4yr/79ctO1NuqZM2sxru7havsdq39Kcq6ubsgOOqj2N vobttu0NurQbvlQs3/QNzfx9uSTwvVjs3/xN3yqMthk+tSBuyoXt3wo0dtrGafTpFTEzp0nG X9XYHPERUe/cSOn2wJXUXdJESDHG4zwpwBj2Z2HwLINhN4MCkTUIpdFdyWFgPbZ0LanAgxiN 0airwoF7sVs8tCTb1B4r5mM+rENrwlyO0ZZNsNjMxp6b5VwO0ir8roWd0f5aqmrur6VM5v76 wlyeuqK85Wbe0R4723AOsneOtGAurWKe6Gd+vXHO0Du9048+5gJA528e6F2Oy2zO6Fvc4qFa IbldBXWLAs760f8Woo2hXiGXbgi4erwnMLKrPutwoeYlu8K0nuu6vuu83uu+/uvAHuzCPuzE XuzGfuzInuzKvuzM3uzO/uzQHu3SPu3UXu3Wfu3Ynu3avu3c3u3e/u3gHu7iPu7kXu7mfu7o nu7qvu79tAARMAHwHgELMALwXu/1vgAOYO/6Pu8noAAToAL6HvD1Lu8jsAAC/+8PIPAPgAIO 8O7xzu8AYO8k4PATgAAFT/ERoAAi4O8HHwEJH/ALTwLwHvIiYPDw7gAjgAD5Xu8oDwAfPwEr r+8AsPIPgAAwXwIjTwImf/MjEPMwb/Ep4O4sD/Q9b+8OAPQrT/QRX+8l7/Atv/MtDwD/HD8B DzD1ETACFB/wRN/wE3/wE7Dz/37xA6/xUg/vEO/y9a7xBk/2JZLvEeAADc/0ACD0cB/3+P72 cV/3b48C7372JSD0DwD3fZ/wb+/wQI8AhA/3hD/374737x71XY/3LF/yOV/w8Y71E+D4Jz/3 MA/3mS/48t74gs/zRU/6iA/vZG/yih/vCCD0EaDyJ//4AIAAfW/zfr/yUX/6E0D2Nt/5Mc/2 JSD6cU/1ItD7dZ/2Um/4Yn/1Bv/29Y4AtJ/5bB/9X6/7EB8Bmn/8bA/vRI/9o3/8Qk/6wu/0 s+/wEO/6Fm/wSi8iBg/5HA/06k/5CpDxlH/4wD8CHH/1Qb/7/8UPAg4CTA8AONNyniU7RSei ypPDstGk4MtEoyaj3u6k47F8KscNMFudVs9aE5cCGk1OGA6gi82EwVTMCMayrtBsLjI8Xd+s B9pXjritv+GvXBvR5YiRVL34ubzMTSQNXVUtngRGjXAZFSX9QOkMtkD5yHWFio6Slpqeoqaq 4uCFzgx9ytysxZZGPByR+iDhIE69aAEsQP2igM4URlWmgO5urWFGKAwV16yJuP5gOWi1huqs 6DRpExfN8LKEbWvV6iUjh/oIc6bZWFZuAV76QCH2HgYTpkiUjR9JBnbxhUZZGSWcIniCtGoi xYoWL3apxkjZCHhEQHVRIMRHwC7OZv9oQaRDDiJJz8zEoydoBDOTRdqxkvgSxy9vGQsO4tYi 2QmRN0RCIjOnzKtsceB085NQ6jyQAn1OjVTw0AglEURgI1GSBMBRLut5WQjgbAt2Mi0pU2ok Isa6du/aFYkurcF52ux9tFVmzyiHP8b9BfW375a/VINYrVmTCI8UhTlpVNdH1BOkNFMSbWtJ SqVibzsTFurlMVw9gkfp0Jp2XKO/j8bi89eFLSEAIh/zRmRZVKxPciEWZY13OfPmvhcuEBeX G2BMVosurm7zgQPpZNVMZRK7xle5eqzGmoyp8tuq6RbOKI+PJw07KFIqB2xfyYruvTjXx4Vq 431DlXrf6MT/ShmSgEOCHN0dJlpWEobC1hV/7RWcFgda594XXkChgHLOkVjiRPHFBEtQe+HU hThM0JHgenAg4cJTwERRxS/DxDRWEBzZ1JVubdAHzU48ZgMFGQO+JdIaP4j4YR0AKgmDaikY SWFcoriBJUFaSBJGLP6gKFYoufm4VoJWijefmme65aM3tYiDnBNZmpinnqY0GJh7cFzyZyhG 5YSnMwl1Mx+ZXBTjQzIR0ueWkSu1AJ12mWHh6E9rbLKhm2npAeUXMlIpCCKedZHCXiQECuhz Mqna2qtiUAoTqETcZpZOsdZAj4YvWNpELQhsgueexyL7Uwkq+lETAjG+QYexuUQj/4qX9DG1 WQsNSeckoJbCgIR9wBKjQzBKPFAbVZri4G0QC6VQiLmC2BkdGmHEoEQhIoEUb07BbNIEsUMq A9jAd0A6sBYDEyEGGTQB9nDB1OATnSaDhJHqfLWSh8mygPpBbWNKjpisySUi9dc12VW3iVou P6nNg9pIpbJfKrAsRMqOcZldHiyIuNi6Pmv8QzA701w0Piil4zI5FQJBWD1GXugH04osFlrB jkWb3SPa8OKs0DjEaHNj2VVKWGK99rX22UAYpi1f1fFjyXUn4+3cAkwkowDffEOzNxMgCR6W MHzL4TcT0Pw9hOIo/D24E5EzAWAJSROHeGGahwR4OpQTpf+4A9AoYCQCnnNWBZI9DIp6UVn+ jUrhkfGdKudw9MDEqpCPbnvkadTOeyGxC2/F7YdLngTf6CxAjbF5Qx+99M3VPTAMd0+fvfbb c9+99xYhEL7445Nfvvnno5+++uuzX/7e4194ffvz01+//ffjn7/++/Pfv//ify+AOGAAAQto wAMiMIEKXCADG+jAB0IQDxGAIAUraMELYjCDGtwgBzvowQ8eUIAiHCEJS2jCE6IwhSpcIQtb 6MIXwjCGMpwhDWtowxviMIc63CEPe+jDHwIxiEIcIhGLaMQjIjGJSlwiE5voxCdCMYpSnCIV q2jFK2Ixi1rcIhe76MUvgjGMYhz/IxnLaMYzojGNalwjG9voxjfCMY5ynCMd62jHO+Ixj3rc Ix/76Mc/AjKQghwkIQtpyEMiMpEYSYAEEqDIRwoRAhSY5CQbWRdKUrIBJWrAJB0JyU/6kJOO ZCQF7CIBCQCAlJokUQIo4ElQwjKHrXylK+vSAFSeQAKrdM4sY+nLG/YSAA2AgCoa8Eoc3JIF uixRMH/pzBi2kpLLTEUtQ5FMYeKSldV8JjdbGExOElOYlczlJDUpyUmGkwWcHCcy2UnKRjbA mJT0JCcl4EpSUsCejlxnNrvpzxE2k5PYPAEEICBKSZ5gm8hEJTjVicuCAkACxIwmAEoJAIja s5QGlegJ/0RZ0Xgq9J8i7V4zW3lRTLoykwk9pkPJucpzUrKiE6XAS+2Jy2sK9AS9zGg6R+rT 7QVUoz1NJQT0WVGWdhSX0XQkRNvJTo7i9KYWTWU1i0rTn2I1e61cJSM1yUlNMlKSCejlVUNx SnXmMwFfTSUqm6rTWp51oAm1pFjXStOwZjWvJoumNHfJT7Wq9KRlJWhg1wnStAq2nBHNZz35 OkqbRnOdFAhnTvVqWR1WtqjLueZlO2tDj+IVLyH1LGlhCNOhlja1ql0ta1vr2tfCNrayna33 murWU1yTkUilLW/zBNNKItWexBRuFySLSZCicqm9Xe6xQGtPFtg2nLd9qye3Kv/XYE6Tudpd TjOrKt3vimKbV81tNbO73fMusprDFEV0w4tU8u4WvfKlCF8Zy17whqK8lFXqaOfrX1V8c7IE fSl+u4DS/VI3l57MqFJPCdz/+jeoJyUwQVF71FwimKqONGo8NRzNcMYVwugtqUWn2d78vpe/ nlTvOVdMz6mKeLsSjiiFL2rhbW4VvivFpiarWU2Txvi81mXrKjl60Yf2862rXKc4R1nWq0J0 rR/tKIyD3Nv62lecjM1kTFfVHQ46NqPDROeHJXlLdFa0k1ZeM5vaBf33wznOcp4znets5zvj Oc963jOf++znPwM60IIeNKpFe9hDIzrRiKA82xvt6EcGQzrShAwBADs= --------------AttPart_07118698==.OLA-- From mail@advantelusa.com Thu Dec 08 14:56:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkRs5-0008Hd-TN for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:56:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA03578 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:55:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from c-24-60-63-96.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.60.63.96] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkRrt-0007B6-QS for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:55:58 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fc5b$767c2c80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Vincent Jackson" To: Subject: Corel Draw Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:55:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC5B.767C2C80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC5B.767C2C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 34 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 32 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 41 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC5B.767C2C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
		Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT downloa! d!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 38 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 33 r! eviews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 50 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FC5B.767C2C80-- From FranBeach@augustaoffshore.com Thu Dec 08 16:27:15 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkTIJ-0000TA-2k; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:27:15 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA17814; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:26:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [84.90.104.152] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkTII-0003rX-IL; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:27:16 -0500 Received: from w2Xm@localhost by vAw.int (8.11.6/8.11.6); Thu, 08 Dec 2005 18:16:51 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Allison Turner" Reply-To: "Allison Turner" To: ipcdn@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org, ipo-archive@ietf.org, ipoib@ietf.org Subject: MS Office XP Pro $49.95 MS 2003 Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:18:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.2730.2 X-Sender: FranBeach@augustaoffshore.com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--TajS8157xsxo5IQ" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 83867a50fd8f547996ccdaf89af24437 drII ----TajS8157xsxo5IQ Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable M

Opt-in Email Special Offer = ; unsubscribe me

= =

SEARCH

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

<= p align=3Dcenter> ON SALE NOW!
= ;	1	Windows XP Pro SP2
	2	Creative Suite 2
	3	MS Office 2003 Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Macromedia Flash 8
	6	Dreamweaver= 8
	7	Norton = Sysworks 2005
	8	Adobe GoLive CS2
	9	Adobe Illustrator CS2
&nbs= p;	10	Borland Architect 2005
= See more by this manufacturer
		Microsoft
=		Macrom= edia
	=	Adobe
	Customers also bought
		<= font face=3Dverdana,arial,helvetica size=3D1> these other items...

Microsoft Windows XP Professional *w/S= P2*
Microsoft
<= /p>
Choose:

= = =

List Price:		$299.0= 0
Price:		$49.99
You Save:		$249.01 (80%)

Availability: Availa= ble for INSTANT download!
Coupon Code: jI4MG8c
Platform:= Windows XP

Sales Rank: #1
System requirements&n= bsp; | Other Versions=
Date Coupon Expires: December 31st, = 2005
Average Customer Review: 3D"5

= Based on 18598 reviews. Write = a review.

= =

Adobe Creative Suite 2 *Premium*
= Adobe

Choose:

List Price:

$1199.00

Price:

$149.99

You Save= :

$1049.01 (95%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT down= load!
Coupon Code: zR5GK
Platform: Windows XP

Sales Rank: #2
System requirements | Other Versions
Date Coupon Expires: December 31st, 2005
Average Customer Review: 3D"5 Based on 145512 review= s. Write a review.

Microsoft Office 2003 *Professional*
Microsoft

<= tr>

Choose:

List Price:	=	$49= 9.00
Price:		$69.99
You Save:		$429.01 (85= %)

=

Availabili= ty: Available for INSTANT download!
Coupon Code: FzojY
= Platform: Wind= ows XP

Sales Rank: #3
System requir= ements | Other = Versions
Date Coupon Expires: Dec= ember 31st, 2005
Average Customer Review:= 3D"5 Based on 112135 reviews. Write a review.

Adobe Acrobat Profes= sional V 7.0
Adobe=

Choose:

You Save:

Availability: Available for INST= ANT download!
Coupon Code: UcC4O
Platform: Windows XP

Sales Rank: #4
System requirements | Other Versions
Date Coupon Expires: December 31st, 2005
= Average Customer Review: 3D"= Based on 19746 = reviews. Write a review.

List Price:		$499.00
Price:		$69.99
	$429.01 (85%)

<= /table> ----TajS8157xsxo5IQ-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 08 16:49:55 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkTeF-0007lv-6k for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:49:55 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA23681 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:49:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkT98-0005do-I6; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:46 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkT93-0005cC-B1; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:41 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15267; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:16:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from [132.151.6.50] (helo=newodin.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkT96-0002vt-K0; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:44 -0500 Received: from apache by newodin.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EkT92-000501-5o; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:40 -0500 X-test-idtracker: no To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:40 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: 'IP Version 6 over PPP' to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org The IESG has received a request from the IP Version 6 Working Group WG to consider the following document: - 'IP Version 6 over PPP ' as a Draft Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-12-22. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-02.txt Implementation Report can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 08 16:57:24 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkTlU-0002yC-AT for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:57:24 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA25914 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:56:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkT8X-0005TH-KJ; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:09 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkT8T-0005Rt-RL; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA15161; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:16:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from [132.151.6.50] (helo=newodin.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkT8W-0002sq-LM; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:08 -0500 Received: from apache by newodin.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EkT8S-0004oW-6b; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:04 -0500 X-test-idtracker: no To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:17:04 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)' to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org The IESG has received a request from the IP Version 6 Working Group WG to consider the following document: - 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) ' as a Draft Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-12-22. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt Implementation Report can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 01:23:01 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekben-0005iL-CT for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:23:01 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA15710 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:22:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkbXf-0004Q9-Eu; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:15:39 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkbXd-0004NA-PG; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:15:37 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA14802; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:14:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkbXk-0005lQ-On; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:15:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB96FIK13513; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:15:18 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:15:18 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Savola To: iesg@ietf.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Last Call: 'IP Version 6 over PPP' to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, The IESG wrote: > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-over-ppp-v2-02.txt > > Implementation Report can be accessed at > http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html I see only two implementation reports relating to PPP there, neither of which has anything to do with IPv6. Should it be up there yet? -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 01:24:24 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekbg8-0005vc-GQ for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:24:24 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA15840 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekbbd-000517-Ab; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:19:45 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekbbc-00050q-50; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:19:44 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA15137; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:18:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekbbk-0005tD-Ac; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:19:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB96JYf13573; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:19:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:19:34 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Savola To: iesg@ietf.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)' to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, The IESG wrote: > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the > iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-12-22. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt > > Implementation Report can be accessed at > http://www.ietf.org/IESG/implementation.html The implementation report (http://www.ietf.org/IESG/Implementations/nd-auto-implementations.txt) seems outdated -- it seems to be from about 1997. I doubt any of the implementations listed there are even maintained anymore. The detail level of the implementation and interop report doesn't seem useful enough in deciding whether the full spec has been implemented and tested or not. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 01:46:36 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekc1c-0007C2-Fv for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:46:36 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA18613 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:45:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkbxF-0005up-7O; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:42:05 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkbxD-0005uU-4m for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:42:03 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA18041 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:40:59 -0500 (EST) From: Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com Received: from sncsmrelay2.nai.com ([67.97.80.206]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkbxB-0006k1-EA for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:42:02 -0500 Received: from sncexwsout1.na.nai.com (sncexwsout1.na.nai.com [161.69.206.120]) by sncsmrelay2.nai.com (Switch-3.1.3/Switch-3.1.0) with SMTP id jB99OZl8011143 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:24:35 -0800 Received: from (161.69.5.246) by sncexwsout1.na.nai.com via smtp id 348e_93a6d04c_6882_11da_9836_0002b3e6f1b3; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from banexmb1.corp.nai.org ([161.69.182.237]) by sncexbr1.corp.nai.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:41:43 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:11:39 +0530 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Fragmented IPv6 packets Thread-Index: AcX8hdzELVT/ttFuSQeWU120tfP+Qw== To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Dec 2005 06:41:43.0593 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E456990:01C5FC8B] X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum 1280 bytes right? When an end host receives an IPv6 fragment which is lesser than 1280 bytes ( except the last fragment ) , should it treat it as invalid and drop it or should it still consider the fragment for reassembly. Are there any IPv6 implementations which reassemble them? Thanks, Muthu -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 01:49:54 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekc4n-0008KA-Sd for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:49:54 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA19103 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekc3J-0007gS-IA; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:48:22 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekc3H-0007dn-Ss for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:48:19 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA18806 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 01:47:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from 63-197-255-154.ded.pacbell.net ([63.197.255.154] helo=sinett.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ekc3O-0006w1-Fn for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 01:48:27 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 22:52:44 -0800 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Fragmented IPv6 packets Thread-Index: AcX8hdzELVT/ttFuSQeWU120tfP+QwABxCEQ From: "Vishwas Manral" To: , X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Muthu, You may want to shift the discussion to the v6ops list instead. Have a look at the draft http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-manral-v6ops-tiny-fragments-is sues-00.txt in the meanwhile. Thanks, Vishwas -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 12:12 PM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum 1280 bytes right? When an end host receives an IPv6 fragment which is lesser than 1280 bytes ( except the last fragment ) , should it treat it as invalid and drop it or should it still consider the fragment for reassembly. Are there any IPv6 implementations which reassemble them? Thanks, Muthu -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From aa@ss.com Fri Dec 09 11:05:47 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekkkk-0003TH-VX for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 11:05:47 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.176.206.23]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA23884 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:04:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:04:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512091604.LAA23884@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?QEBAQEBAtc2829eqyMO8uLj2vq3TqrK7tO21xM341b6jrL/J1fvM5cLyo6zS?= =?GB2312?B?sr/J0tS1pbbAwvJAQEBAQEA=?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:05:46 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com)--12�� ݶ��www.ye2.net)--2.5�� ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn)--3�� ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn)--1�� й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com)--15�� ƹ��(www.itsend.com)--8000Ԫ ע�� ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 13:10:45 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ekmhh-0003Nu-Bs for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:10:45 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09501 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:09:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkmRA-0000Xx-P8; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:53:40 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkmR8-0000X2-L3 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:53:38 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA07437 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:52:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkmRE-0004ba-W3 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:53:46 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (PPP430.air-4x8x.dti.ne.jp [210.170.213.216]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA6C1521A for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:53:14 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:53:07 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: ipv6@ietf.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793 Subject: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org I believe this was discussed and clarified before, but I could not find any pointer, so let me ask here... It's regarding the "magic number" of 0xFFFE used in the modified EUI-64 format for the interface identifier of an IPv6 address. According to draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-04.txt (or already-published RFCs), we insert 0xFFFE in the middle of the interface identifier in order to convert an 48-bit MAC address to the modified EUI-64 format: [EUI64] defines a method to create a IEEE EUI-64 identifier from an IEEE 48bit MAC identifier. This is to insert two octets, with hexadecimal values of 0xFF and 0xFE, in the middle of the 48 bit MAC (between the company_id and vendor supplied id). (in APPENDIX A) However, according to [EUI64], we use 0xFFFF (not 0xFFFE) "to create an EUI-64 identifier from a 48bit MAC identifier" for network devices (i.e., MAC-48): To support encapsulation of EUI-48 and MAC-48 values within small subsets of the EUI-64 values, the first four digits of the manufacturer's extension identifier shall not be FFFF16 or FFFE16. Thus, the 64-bit values of the following form are never-assigned EUI-64 values: ccccccFFFEeeeeee(16) (an EUI-48 extension) ccccccFFFFeeeeee(16) (a MAC-48 extension) <==== this one (from http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/tutorials/EUI64.html) My question is whether there was any special reason why the IPv6 addr-arch document specified 0xFFFE. I googled and found a web page saying this is "an error": Confusingly IPv6 -- one of the most prominent standards that uses EUI-64 -- applies these rules inconsistenly. Due to an error in the appendix to the specification of IPv6 addressing, it is currently standard practice in IPv6 to extend MAC-48 addresses (such as IEEE 802 MAC address) to EUI-64 using 'FF-FE' rather than 'FF-FF'; it remains to be seen how this inconsistency will be resolved in the future. (http://www.kingj.com/articles/MAC_address) Is this true, or was there any particular reason for the "confusing" choice? I appreciate any clarification in advance, JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 13:52:09 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EknLk-0004fr-VL for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:52:09 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA14577 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:51:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EknGg-0003bx-3U; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:46:54 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EknGd-0003RX-1c for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:46:51 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA13749 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:45:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com ([216.52.23.28]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EknGh-0006fe-SK for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:46:59 -0500 Received: from bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com (bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com [10.2.2.57]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jB9IkBNj019457 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:46:13 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:46:07 -0800 Message-ID: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F702FB06E1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> Thread-Topic: Question on draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-08.txt Thread-Index: AcX88NDjj64uC0owR1aTJGzUGF/aIw== From: "Li, Qing" To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Question on draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-08.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In Section 5.5.3, how is the 2-hour chosen as the magic number? -- Qing =09 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From vang@attotech.com Fri Dec 09 16:09:43 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkpUt-0001Pc-QS; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:09:43 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03660; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:08:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkpV6-0004EA-El; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:10:00 -0500 Received: from 200-204-202-114.dsl.telesp.net.br ([200.204.202.114]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EkpUI-0004aa-Pz; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:09:07 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([200.204.202.114]) by msn.com (Sendmail 8.0.3) with ESMTP (SSL) id IYT72589 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:09:01 -0600 Message-ID: <470c008x.9203523@msn.com> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 15:09:01 -0600 From: "Barry Vincent" User-Agent: Omni Way Webmail X-Register: 992463 X-User: prussia MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Cc: ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org, iporpr-admin@ietf.org, iporpr-web-archive@ietf.org, ipoverib@ietf.org Subject: Mortagge ratee approvedd Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------JavaMail.038849387106" X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------JavaMail.038849387106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

but asparagine it bulk the rotunda be their ! lath in or but alginate be avery but manuscript or collier or narcissism see marlowe be wagoneer ! dried Or maybe not

--------------JavaMail.038849387106 Content-Type: image/gif; name="cpa.0.gif" Content-ID: <6.0.0.32.0.01531533840157.79885881@knowlton.yahoo.com.9> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="cpa.0.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhGAKlAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZmZlm/2Zm/2Zm ZmYz/zMz/zMzMzMA/wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAAAYAqUAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum89orUJROigOKrfona7b7/h8FgJpS+ApChIiEmx6 h4iJios0fH6AKIKEhoyVlpeYaY4kB38jCnyUkgCFn6GZqKmqq0ubI52AoQ0SfQCjpQAQEg2z tay/wMHCL7p8xrpwDb6dbLfNngDMw9PU1ayha2uzcBANB98H3baDpGzKJOLW6uvsea4isKQS 8/R9zrm++O37/P1f79E84Spx7x1AfwgTKlQCMN47Ovdmkdi1sKLFiz8aehLUYE6pe506Atg2 BxLGkyhT/6LQCEgQPUP3xr0cMVClzZs4TXxzsZMTpZxAgwpt4W2o0aNIkypdyrSp06dQo0qd SrWq1atYs2pNsobgT1tfy8ixZTLP2Bx0nJTFtHYrjofzStQ0Eu8RjZiHRuWYaxfIuSB1reh1 q2Mwr4GBjySGB03G4ESPhSzmcZDHZCmRCdsIXIjXJ3Kg0nl9RWls6KLRzHWDc2AWaniuWyoT eaI1hDWgAdl+bWs2vLRg5/j+NHz0J0O7IQGX46Y1bY+vZrdUrvwrHTnSo8WGvfq3c+4NSs+G eYqgm1OgwpMY/+m8gu22Vnedw4d3+uambkdyzlqZ/mi6pHWaZjTgIole4rgGSv9jIkgkgi4j OKJLeMiM082C3xTzUzi0mLMLhiYIcpsu5JTSyYjQKEhLQJA4wpGIHoW3YgkOBvQMioYMJEkn u+Qzjkc45kLbjKQ8V46FFP7BoX4vBhhQjwHd5tqDUpYyC5E0hTIhiqx1OGUutCSpn2tX1jIh iGAehossWNK0izcnvrfighAk82GFBMLwl2dHliNIi0ZKQ8p/hYRDyUe4SDNZPIIWaYIrcR05 iqKJFtqYhLWAwk2mdfoBkyeubKLjICGdMEqo9oAG4ThlIYqciZ40ek6pD9L2Z13/VTbjiYx5 +Bk35LBoI2N9GErTMy1ZuQxfRIIygoOj/BmhkXmucKr/IZ7Bogw4rQVLU0fpgcugG4hOxMai GzVWY6/PlviMfY112WIfswA3UqEpbOJIo9KOKmyIpI76jZXK+CrXM+YKe+s3t0LDDLeW/heh j5McazFF7LoSz2ANCaLaK6WsBo5oFuu06ijbgrNutSvAUteBg5BIT6Tr0SvjSJzOjLDF6MIx 2GOBxVTmpzpdauY8EpMoMQkNnxuvQKIE3NaOT3PTkZRXU1suz+nOPM/Aunk9zzPzoKbroWj3 WbHG6aKT80zvlCJ2m2rjPDN0YIrN8gud5dPZ1RQDHM8fFIVEx9YV9/zjZ30tXpOcqRY9L2lO /lY5J2+SE9jgUf9LkNQg29kJ/6vM7px425Iz1pZwkZ5d8pE1hbysz97u+yEcsifMlwkD1Us7 3pXtTVTB69V7b3Un7EJON6gPOxisa2080EEYg1nxe+2OQ8ltgTmiHpUjbR+4MUPS5mDvoANM iPmgQVmktxY/7zTtpc3/LdPf2Apq4AP1z4YrHtOH6oYVpcU5DxoBfMha+sc+vJFkDmERnqnw RJ9Y0YJ21LqXSFzikXM5SX4ExJwh+EA/E5CEg5Iykb46FUCM9eJ4wyJJo5g2tnZ1SSQklInn aNggCw4JF186mAGPJKgKhaNY6jLRNmjlINdV7HoqNNOyRlgIOmkPQLjokEve1UHeic8j7SMW BksiQf8U8EouweJQ2SJRKdrILDRDzGL13NQRNe7uXmFyVw+Rpps3grFHxZJZLewYOELA70rV 41Eed8i4Pc7xgQH0YhxzVDhByms9Ovujgb4mxCf2ySUXBB8d9+ifB71kE2qMJCh3NyqkBZBH HqTHkCJYRhiAowY94UlbcplLM64OHr0Epk6iF8xb5otaxuTEL1sWzB7wspnDjKYyN7PMaLAG HbQpZieF+YJmJjOZtcTKZZwiqBkKziPVDKc6W1aMq/SinSsoxuXWSc8YzOcqbrintdaQznr6 858ADahAB0rQghpUDWHBDw3OIhlaPoGhtrQlLYuzBH0SoZ+FcehBiRDJidn/IDM+AOkTRKqC v7ggMwpyQvB+QNKWMSiehdxoER4Iwxq0tDDww0xOW7BSU+20p0YAKg9umoJxytQKu+rdhdpD GsFlhzv/UWhqwBPBPxGPaeXJjyjeQFFOPJU+otFLcrzandCIIqvauU1kzNqf7pSEF2t5j2ik 2pV8Lk2AaS0KXamT15+YFR4BKssbQHEu/+gVPgMy1bkGu1TjQBA8JpFrVLm6QbT+UxpJrZJI /PW5O1mwSkikxKy8NEcwHsYXbEItaKnUjRf6gUs9TNLvxpGkT3GpTFSCHJAWlFOlkStI8oAr jTx7SfBt0UibENGC2NDGXsXpS2SiCJ3KUgz1kJZU/xrSIJrcFiXgZo9dTdpkbZ90juhmkJ69 SFGw+tW5z72qGb5ooi8oEtaXRlIaJsXvFMGULMFqDlGA+pGspHi/TeQ3d4Y8wQo9OqjaMNBz LtrdgsFnYAPHTH+4w1amfrpeBFqQdgEuge3cGKhNDky0ZnIjEmfZoJiu83KJlFt7efg6wLYP xA8Dx1ykVSshcUscIssQ4EL3Od6kLH+DgBm3mvYKUQY5HN5An4JD+6u6VbmHEI7clEP4p2uB Kspv0PH/dvzTwHXrkkfu1qOQODkRE3hh5BKs7Vp0x3+C8GIzbuQTlXG3GCJRbNapXR/mNmix 9YFtaxmaKfUGM7GBbc2G9P9anRqTmTkTeXc/S58+QGpp1T0sZm+wFKCxuItkbdkUM7ukzPrM 3e5RjMmrpEd/ZsbmV5CINwC9c8U4S+OK+c6AjijcS9XnUVZGENGReGFlYObgtYgqoZQus+c4 51MeunqIra6akJzFC6r90jbN426MdKxqF4Pv2n44DN54xz19LAbcGBUex3zRQtHmFITVq5HH oDFHe7HKYgrEK1nwuhjsYZmmXYFZ/db3rEMTmKnVW5WbGY5lK3fx3EbDNoPzTY6UhqQW/c4f JBAnbrxKKx4ID0unBT6xdHSUOdOrtXZGrtFwZtqDUqTdvb2FYBQ+Kb5KtG8oT4ixAHKki8im Ic7/ozTGU8XKwjcU4NGvSHRpw5BWd8xhJF04p50KUIYY4xEganivwgqEheFm8NU5SSm0U2vl yyY7fwG04h7KfFAgTk1LkFPzrTwGlJ160iI/lzDAd3RCmJyJexUvE7mvcoSzM2E9+ihLvBES EojcICcf367BT9yRLK6NH/9YSk4DfY0RChZNEVmpyj/pK2x7CcbWaMcMwr2QNCN1KPGYuWnP TCS42jBAvRnvNhQfmtOUpvFnAE5gfpv4Jukl8W2JfF/WpvjKxL41le98FkDzmdo/5jDL0vzr H/X8RjEq+tdvlSWx//2EsSj850//+tv//vjPv/73z//+Q5D88scE/KQT//6GSw/1a7XhFRaV TxrFgIKVDW0AgSngH30XUhCRFrx0HEhALrjWZD6xgNkQfkWgGwWod9UAI+hQZ0lAQZ9RgSxA U0rAesOGJ3bULLS2S15jb/XwGZN3AmUigjZQIRUSSQ+Ue0MQayoXbT0oeHInBWfUUUpnDYhn d1PAghd3A1Z4BFukPD5yJYAwJRziNJ4QRCl4I0CSIbAyhqVlSi7oA0aULFQ0dl73A2OjPIfE SU9iJziEKOamBE+IaSq4CrCUh8LRWMHhHbVhWFjlVodogjQ4G8ajE+NxT6dBHqVmKuyRGvVD HoaoDXflMaNDMqAkh8mSKsBnhAVkSnbyKeJyiv/3diZg9RqemFD+ITG2cVep5zNhpiELUhQ0 U4mBYFjKkYmvRQr8wYMe5oqpOHchIoyKNSCJBVVbJVfq0S1M8iZZBYXT4BKDiEe3lmBXCDK0 AE9KQ3a/GDJdM3qYQws76I1rpI6d94080i4ewo6zhzQ+olw5pUjx8hkdEYnM6I/0yIzzCJBW SGt5QyKUNI68M441xCPf+Cig8geA50eRUiao11kyA0YKWTSEQ36p1kPbQ5EcFxYusZENaY9I g3oniTSLZo+hRg+NF5HaOA2CxBgWJBAdFhZfEiAoiILnOGbAIoY8iTHthIJiF5Di2CUTSUm/ hZO4YyIpORdlk4WDSEH/VthRLcRzMXMpM5guGwZyUklDYUlbT6JgE1lCzBgXSImHEwENQogo tvcSJlGVcOmV5BI1YYGHWfiQfrk8a4KOG1ZHM8KNZ3lF6qBIycI+zLWTEkmC3XIoOtmC/DWP IvmYQFJ2KoOOcVWSGmQhmolkjVlUrBcLK2KFPLKHdOZfeikPbxmQWVghAMlJqPgKs5YqY4mZ QxiYchiakZmA8aGG+vFLnAcmh3aXq6mVu9MSfRksNBMXlmmWlcMrf/hD4VgNQaSco3mdrili eNmdV4QMZ4SYr0kseZODSnmFrxQXxrNqM1GbmEMiePQGgSWObvSdUdhFuRcXWPmVwLKa4Bki /6t2NGXTFnGplnjCn3NDi17DlAWqAvbYLYVSn/2Zl5TZBjK4QM65ocvIKzS4In8omQO0DtpJ mUHZkJipiuCZQEpig3uZRqdZKNzynwDTmmBimIE1owHqEwPDX+7pkjLxHAYpdIxJkOw5Pf4J m5PpUx+Cgr0ha7qZLnGYYDnKLQ2pVhQkJ6iIH39QLz+6IkPKgQOJRlg6bM/JoePpoQ4DooXZ P/8FhJWgnKglN6rHF5XDEUFEm3UqlOA5T2xIhdlJB1nopJWTXrUQqFGJAr7TlQy4BrC4RUWG k0Uzp6sYI2Z5mN6ph26SqGhpW/HxhXaaloiZoIOAqMWooiaVlSvSpf9VlA29yEVnOZ6oSSTN 6Sa2Gp1T8qFItGEiaoIkGjuIAphkY5IXFIZJ6VofVENxKS58sUUn+XoyMZTJE6zi2Hpkw6kA Uwja2lt3qVYQmJRTqFBO4loigoZiCCxzyZR2IpaKKmxgWqx+One7uYeUBK2GuY52MpGE+VKw tK3Utab6+qeuha94pKG2Co6IB65ruqtXGClSZQ1QiISa1ISp146sF3ixxpm6R7GOBKSxJhJX Qi0SW7HK4TWbNYcymIQOipC856ITS2eu17KFhCcX25tMupKA2Y6ZOnfPGrLd+bFoWQ/uGrM0 9HspKrPI6JYpKLRaw6HgWIOqaZ6K2VGRUpP/09B8DviBVvqMGyKBpBFmO9FLIQh9OrYMIcg0 AZi12ReBA8hNZoSAy+d8Ovob+mQsdOtvrsq2DiV9Xrt9ZvSt1RGAfptLEgi4X1uCEHQdJNi2 tcERuwSAIMi4ITKA0+e2Ysu40re4Wzu41fdPhRqITjiHOKB+RzFs/mcHJymfvwBRp9u6zKeI rhu7sju7tFu7tnu7uEtQArC7vBsAMRAAAuC7QAC8IhC8L8C7vVsDxOsEAkAABDAAKIC8uyu8 RAC8wku9O4C92LtQbbgDcOoDtiG5zNe9F1UEgltUGrgCBFAAzuu8BQC9LxAABbC9PCAABSAC BSAAACC/9FsC69u+/+sLvzJgv04QwANQAPNrAuwLwO9bBPwLAARcv/crAgSgvzdAVDxgUlEQ WKBrLaLLFW8KBEJVM2qXAs5LAvZrwS3wwEAQwSPAwiZMACicvzPgwkpgv9fbwCVAwyNgvwIc BA9swzngwjz8UR/shn2IBB18UkeshSGcEUmsdkJ1wiRQxM37vNQbAANQwTh8AlqMxcWrxQPg u188ACq8v1u8uxMcvFr8vv07AlQ8Ajz8xWC8v/q7xWNcvBMMwfoLvM0bvMZbvH0MyHVcvM47 yFkMyD8cx3J8xhC8xxB8yCRQxmd8xSo8vXgsx/u7voHcw8Aryc1rxi+8xWAcAJwMvOxrwf+U 7MkDkMfVBlm+OnBkRBrfkVb/8Vdg5VddxTQU6B18MlYR2CEDR4lntTThGxnNkR5+ZVnt8VfK HB3lYazwAcxkIVyIOMtkQUIUdYucCHkswMjya8EB3LwJLL8VvL4JXAL2e84JjMCtHADmLAAH DL/rTM4TnL+mnMoqAM48nMoHvMbsa8br67sRPNCPnL9jnM4AcMLmzM7Ca8BuXMQHbALhrMCO XNEL/b4HLMP76886PM/zTMHO28rsW7yRzL7bu8DknMYGDQAefb/kTAD5/LwdXcEh7dIa/cbR 0iFO0lwhRF67qlu4hQ+6RVtOSkPjlZqmuFxtIE9HAnY4tFoWwlv/kwpcEzKwE6ElPQIizzUn xbAk78LUwcUbPs0Mt+ZaXU0vQDrFXCzPOmzKKkzDE03BCg3HHO3S0FvSFCzAXRzHCIy/fVzX J3DIu3vTXfzIBD3HNEzALZ3CIgDDDK3XeI3YemzKd63DLyzZVezILq2/h13RNF3ZnS0CW0zX wnvYenwCem3Oj73Y6dzFRCzOfN3Od81GoqQPFXao8EMr8fFdFQYy/8MpzqZiAXGKKJY8OQJ5 R9RiwI1XWxpx4hI2ezlISQVf3zUpFnTcDQZpOKPbzCgtzlJxqPLNC+y+tf3Yjh3alD3JRSy8 is3G8IzPEn3Pgf3GcFze/0vRB5zYm/3I/y39yJlNvZGtwhNd2i9M2Y6d2efdyBYNAAa+1+EM z/Gtv5zsv3cNwwDe4IDN4JO83xk+2hEu4TRcxLbNLyT5INJCMoxkY04GJ0KmmS0ARy+jJAxj pslNLHDp4lAmK/uYcRqs4mrjP00dRgpD43FmcYtzG19GcPy6Kq7AJ/tc25ZtyAiMwPrb3oKN 4Rve0VVe5cGr0BFMw1puAuBMxfaMwPzN4PZr5T28x5AtwzDM2As+2Q8u0ilA4hvOyM4rv13O 5vnsxnbe2tgrxFs+2lt+5gkc21ze51fO2YS3OS0aarkQal+RGHwmkwJEaIuGi9qBkDPuaJKk NrNpaEHT45NjEP8UI+R7tmqW1zUNiuSfNunSkHSX3jr01neMDODya8a+O+IqrOVjrtj0G+f0 3dH2Heht/shjHN9pvuE47OEf/ubGnuy5Ttrzi9mFruFt7rt6LtOC3eEGHccYTuiGXu6uvexB vMdi/u3lXuLadiE2g8xJBBHLA3J7K9ZZLagyR1RZJJnzBW0lmzoUlg/Ukza+hi87PUAglXUU MhI3w+SrOFsAhOvnPdEuDNp3jdpyLMClXcTYbryYvb4bPuYWXgITHcewDcmuHegXr9CRLcA0 PdcdHdj//dj2jedULPOT/fHw7MqjLe51Te4eH9cUnvGJru4WzPPt/socF1tOo8Ej6ij/4v1w ZPQ9LNconfZyEdTvbGiU+XA49ynw+rAua6jqsNNAiyM9C4fk2lXcVD84aK8x6bTnEn7Ani3m Fe7YfE6/Hr7r5W73aJzAHr7mIz/Hjk73PS/X5YzmHz7aEVzRNvzRJb33jxzY8Avt+a3ON4/u 5JzDly/4Yu7hKE3ZQD/okMzh5n7Hi3/0G2/tfSz6KlyAKONDUGlIAM9gKJRcRWcl2Z1uVNg9 T8c/N2506aJ5HqJzYj9iPbRABn8kuk/kRRT8nuQH/LYmkff8t32+993lFbz9+WvmVQ7tJh/+ 2f7PbG7tAV3sOA295I7OVd79i56/DRz5dz8C+23Da/6+L+/l/20OAoUoAKVQDKUKFOS6ijEa rGfsAoPsBnIKEAiqHm04erVUyVKyd0MBnCRCQZjbMXESxQugkKgaknFjBQGXxIfuQbIufceQ Lze+jo+5gMNZ3gWIkYntuanwjUlAvL1slWy1lZVAQMAhNqbJDb60LU5WIuoxhl4CNOLNNbY1 ku31Jb6Rdp2FFQJ4lnB6IaLWja3d/gX/BRS9EAsPHSMrrzAPF1khP0tTTxsRFzdnA5xsV1c7 J3eFU2N/j3ubR2WTG4YKH8SfU8tvLu7d49b/xefz788LBlBfwBUDC+JjU29fP4QBDx50KHEi wgA/KGIMRmRekIweP4I818BfyJImT/+iTKlyJcuWLssV8BZMABWZL2/izKlzJ8+ePn8C/WZz mIChQY8iTap0KdOmTp9CjSp1KtWqVq9izap1K9euXr+CDSt2LNmyZs+iTat2Ldu2bt/CjSt3 Lt26du/izat3L9++fv8CDix4MOHChg8jTqx4MePGjh9Djix5MuXKli9jzqx5M+fOnj+DDi16 NOnSpk+jTq16NevWrl/Dji17Nu3atsUaWODAAYMEKxIkMNDFAPAXCXY78K2CuHAVCIq/YG5c OXHg1oELr349+PLt1pt3945dRQIGuxeAF1Z+N4P04ou/h/5nfDD6JaQv181bOTIE5nkjsIJ2 34U3H3fdIYf/noHgxSecfQD4x16ABf524Hz/WQgAfuTxV8J6Dih4X3wavpceawlEEMEDDqT4 gAosmqhhBA4sl+KMNjaHIn8oRtChhz2+kOKPNhLpG49Eppgjkjb6aMCSOGr4QIoOSBnBAurZ SGWKDKjwpJAsPknjH06qKMyUvwFZwgItgvlAjC+2WKWYMi7JpYxzrgCjCmuqCGaa5G3ZpZe+ 6VlCm3LW+CcAhUaXZZU7KgqAkPfJWeWVABy5JKaDvkZmcwZIeSmjNc6ZIn8MlLmpcjz6+KOP k+pY358GoCpmrOfcqoKUdtLZaq+JKjcpMsJimWQwTAK6qrEloOriH81+uut9MyYa/6CTeMKp ZAQMLmuojcNRm+e2zKoYbQR2kjmut28GOqSSr0ag67nAvjBqrrNJ2aGTzo46rZhr8lqCsbGy Kiu8rhocZLyqznMvigHT+WykKIpJ7LELI5PvvH8Q+a7A6sLZ6r5dGHvtCmv6ZnIXhXZLLn/7 otwotnqOrHB2Njq7KMiAQkwxwivAunGi9e58r2wWa5gtuGJKaSK3wJmK5cEMz6comT9/c6+U E66wNckYCygoNUi/gMC8ZEt6brixmp2zc6mebGUXa16psst3/kEz3Mulh3LNpBItHN1zy71v vut24bXCWH9cguJdR8C1zu5FCpvdee/sb+NYIso5crsFnf/cdj+2ZwBx0m4q+nXI3Et2zALu zXGP25mItgqoBvj64lETXHnaK2cOIbX7Wseis5crjeKlwy7cNOwzj9uv8DRe6+nkX2PuYKST uq6ovTN612m4wUivsu2bFun550E/OSSSc2ZKJOuKkm203cd9/vGSUwdT899Ax4tHDDPa5sQV I5Oli0hiQh7icqWf85AugoAz4PVkhrdaVRCA2aOa2H7XhXt9r32u+R/wDhiu87GKR2/i4OYI SDoDIAB1jKNG68C2p0j9DX9gKqCZbPgCPiEnRZLbHIt6AyTlyQ54Q5we3u6DQQZeD4lq2o2U mNYnLYENeXpi0RLNRr0T9kh6ZHP/ntG450MA6C6DLDyaDx/gJjVqTmdDZMADjCQ3ADQrYRpc Y7LkBSlfSW0FqGqV82yGPQ8yj3mfk2EHyXQ4Eqbug0K7HZCQJyQo6s1tmiPTImc1vgZO8m4q M5uKgseiJgVteZsbZOJ29j1AuoaVb1tY+db2SevlipF93KMLOWg9Ps6vQyjS5DAlBjEPno+H xoldyxB5JOUcDnIia5n1Lnc1TKormm+jEapU2bYJKu2X0xqX3VDVzE0562GostM3AZXO2BWT grukDZkUVDCdBcd0pmsiAKqYnSpijUytKuPCHqbPg7JwTe8s3UFXuEbjWUuFF3PAhBJQpY81 dJ97xJyP/2TZQW+lSaDCieEn0ZSme+5LnxadV0obWkEytYdEgWpmIbWornui9JNQAp6bQLXT tD0AAbmJmreCKtPMfY+hCBUfkpbnJ/nZzacKnCf6TERQ971vjYeLX5YC+QJz4myJy3nqlprj pZ2h7WplY2YWiQqhKtnomCZN3zizSickEQpkUk1fPOOGrpIyiqsv+yQpVwhWIsX0rnH9KpKM Gri52hU2z3lQRjWq0fBkSJ/Ruex9OKuhT1V2n5oVkGhD69DRRsc6Yh3OddJj2s0Kw7OdhS1p TTTZDKnHOsNxaW1dKlvtcA21pOUbbSskH+ION7aqNcApV3DbNwG3f0577W2qG60bh1o3u9rd rlPO6t3vgje84h0vectr3vOiN73qXS972+ve98JXvNgFjWnra9/74je/+t0vf/vr3/8COMAC HjCBC9zgA+eXuwpeMIMb7OAHQzjCEp4whSts4j52HMMa3jCHO+zkiHm4xCIeMYlLbOITozjF Kl4xi1vs4hfDOMYynjGNa24wZXM4xzreMY843OMue0wIQh4ykYts5CMjOclKXjKTm+zkJ0M5 yogJAQA7 --------------JavaMail.038849387106-- From darkneon@alphapegasos.com Fri Dec 09 18:22:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkrYz-0004Jc-GG for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:22:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA26118 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:20:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from [201.230.101.124] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkrY4-0002t7-0Z for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:21:55 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fd40$d00a5700$0100007f@localhost> From: "Amir Turner" To: Subject: Photoshop, Windows, Office Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:20:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FD40.D00A5700" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FD40.D00A5700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 47 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 41 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 34 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FD40.D00A5700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
		Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 37 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 39 revie! ws)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 39 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FD40.D00A5700-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 09 21:31:13 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkuW1-0008Bj-0q for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:31:13 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA28257 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:30:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkuOO-0006Td-RX; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:23:20 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkuOK-0006T2-3q for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:23:18 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27350 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:22:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EkuOU-0004Bd-1P for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:23:27 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:200:0:8002:6178:c2e8:a223:1214]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71AD1525D; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:23:01 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:23:01 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Li, Qing" In-Reply-To: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F702FB06E1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F702FB06E1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Question on draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-08.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:46:07 -0800, >>>>> "Li, Qing" said: > In Section 5.5.3, how is the 2-hour chosen as the magic > number? In case you're asking the main editor of this particular draft, I don't know. That 2-hour was alrady in the spec in RFC2462, so the authors of the original RFC may know the reason. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From Wpyazku@optonline.net Sat Dec 10 10:06:12 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1El6Ie-0001IS-Gp; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:06:12 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA03906; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:05:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1El6J3-0000j0-0c; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:06:38 -0500 Received: from [221.216.28.217] (helo=lh) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1El6Ia-00034x-Rf; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:06:10 -0500 From: "Nellie Lucero" To: pilc-admin@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Information Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:00:02 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_JDBEDUSH.ZMXIWQXM" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_JDBEDUSH.ZMXIWQXM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your current position has been assessed to the specific committees, and upon conscientious weighing up, we are able to suggest to you the following opportunity. Based upon conscientious weighing up you make the grade to acquire a generous profit on your initial property investment. By completing the following attached form in a timely manner we will be able to settle our evaluation, and we feel sure you will acquire not only a decreased rate of interest, but also a cash return that will execute all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to settle this part of the treaty. With warmest regards, Nellie Lucero Should you prefer not to benefit of this holiday opportunity you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_JDBEDUSH.ZMXIWQXM Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your current position has been assessed to the specific committees, and upon conscientious weighing up, we are able to suggest to you the following opportunity.

Based upon conscientious weighing up you make the grade to acquire a generous profit on your initial property investment.

By completing the following attached form in a timely manner we will be able to settle our evaluation, and we feel sure you will acquire not only a decreased rate of interest, but also a cash return that will execute all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to settle this part of the treaty.

With warmest regards,

Nellie Lucero

Should you prefer not to benefit of this holiday opportunity you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_JDBEDUSH.ZMXIWQXM-- From t4evr@aloevitae.com Sat Dec 10 10:59:41 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1El78P-00004y-IM for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:59:41 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA09399 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:58:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from c-67-181-10-162.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([67.181.10.162] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1El78n-0002KX-AX for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:00:07 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5fdcc$90894c80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Antonio Roberts" To: Subject: Software At Low Pr1ce Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:58:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FDCC.90894C80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FDCC.90894C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 35 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 37 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 49 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FDCC.90894C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
1 Office Pro 2003
2 Adobe Photoshop 9.0
3 Windows XP Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
5 Flash MX 2004
6 Corel Draw 12
7 Norton Antivirus 2005
8 Windows 2003 Server
9 Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
10 Adobe Illustrator 11
See more by this manufacturer
Microsoft
Symantec
Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $550.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 50 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $200.00
OurPrice: $49.95
YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 32 reviews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
   by Adobe

ListPrice: $599.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 49 reviews)
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FDCC.90894C80-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sun Dec 11 00:08:04 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElJRM-0006bT-U4 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:08:04 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA11190 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:07:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElJK9-0005K7-Vp; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:00:37 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElJK8-0005IR-AP for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:00:36 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA10526 for ; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:59:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net ([66.92.66.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElJKZ-0005Sg-RQ for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:01:07 -0500 Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B4979C for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:00:10 -0500 (EST) To: ipv6@ietf.org From: Rob Austein Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:00:10 -0500 Message-Id: <20051211050010.E8B4979C@cyteen.hactrn.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 Subject: Weekly posting summary for ipv6@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 14.29% | 3 | 13.84% | 15532 | jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp 9.52% | 2 | 14.52% | 16298 | francis.dupont@enst-bretagne.fr 9.52% | 2 | 7.83% | 8787 | vishwas@sinett.com 9.52% | 2 | 6.38% | 7159 | pekkas@netcore.fi 9.52% | 2 | 5.91% | 6633 | iesg-secretary@ietf.org 4.76% | 1 | 9.42% | 10573 | doo090@yahoo.ie 4.76% | 1 | 8.02% | 8997 | marcelo@it.uc3m.es 4.76% | 1 | 5.58% | 6261 | jeroen@unfix.org 4.76% | 1 | 5.54% | 6221 | h.soliman@flarion.com 4.76% | 1 | 5.30% | 5951 | radhakrishnan@zazunetworks.com 4.76% | 1 | 4.60% | 5167 | elwynd@dial.pipex.com 4.76% | 1 | 3.87% | 4348 | sra+ipng@hactrn.net 4.76% | 1 | 3.39% | 3808 | muthukumar_lakshmanan@mcafee.com 4.76% | 1 | 2.96% | 3327 | jean.martin@us.army.mil 4.76% | 1 | 2.83% | 3176 | qing.li@bluecoat.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 21 |100.00% | 112238 | Total Grunchweather Associates provides this automatic summary on an at-whim basis at the request of the IPv6 WG chairs. Your mileage may vary. We decline responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors. If this script produces broken output, you get to keep both pieces. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From Rwhagqa@optonline.net Sun Dec 11 02:53:20 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElM1I-0002PV-JH; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:53:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA24006; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:52:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512110752.CAA24006@ietf.org> Received: from [218.5.112.78] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ElM1p-0001IM-JL; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:53:55 -0500 From: "Laurence Randle" To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Information Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:52:12 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_JMIYYOAH.SNQZQAAD" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_JMIYYOAH.SNQZQAAD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your specific case has been assessed to the necessary boards, and upon fastidious weighing up, we are able to submit to you the consequent opportunity. Based upon fastidious weighing up you certify to acquire a attractive rield on your original property investment. By completing the consequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to decide our review, and we feel assured you will acquire not only a reduced rate of interest, but also a cash return that will carry out all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to decide this phase of the agreement. With kind regards, Laurence Randle Should you prefer not to take gain of this holiday opportunity you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_JMIYYOAH.SNQZQAAD Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your specific case has been assessed to the necessary boards, and upon fastidious weighing up, we are able to submit to you the consequent opportunity.

Based upon fastidious weighing up you certify to acquire a attractive rield on your original property investment.

By completing the consequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to decide our review, and we feel assured you will acquire not only a reduced rate of interest, but also a cash return that will carry out all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to decide this phase of the agreement.

With kind regards,

Laurence Randle

Should you prefer not to take gain of this holiday opportunity you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_JMIYYOAH.SNQZQAAD-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 12 03:33:13 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elj7Q-0004Rk-QC for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:33:13 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA17025 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:32:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elj2h-0003KR-DC; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:28:19 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elj2d-0003Jv-TM for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:28:18 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA16147 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:27:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Elj3D-0001UQ-DO for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:28:52 -0500 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBC8Rsec183090 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:27:54 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jBC8Rs1M181476 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:27:54 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jBC8Rruc010579 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:27:53 +0100 Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jBC8RrGW010569; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:27:53 +0100 Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-135-204.de.ibm.com [9.145.135.204]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA17652; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:27:47 +0100 Message-ID: <439D347F.50707@zurich.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:27:43 +0100 From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ipv6@ietf.org References: <200512070209.jB729dHY077351@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> In-Reply-To: <200512070209.jB729dHY077351@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marcelo bagnulo braun Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A couple of minor comments. 1. I wonder if it would be better to use the shim6 terminology "ULP" (upper layer protocol) instead of "application." At least, I suggest referring to it. 2. In section 3.2, I think you also need to say something about SCTP. I presume that the interaction between 3484bis and SCTP will be quite complex. Brian -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From aa@ss.com Mon Dec 12 06:19:12 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elli4-0003jJ-49 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:19:12 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.177.61.95]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA05933 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:18:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:18:14 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512121118.GAA05933@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAtc2829eqyMO8uLj2vq3TqrK7tO21xM341b6jrL/J1fvM?= =?GB2312?B?5cLyo6zSsr/J0tS1pbbAwvJAQEBAQEBAQEA=?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:19:12 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com)--12�� ݶ��www.ye2.net)--2.5�� ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn)--3�� ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn)--1�� й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com)--12�� ƹ��(www.itsend.com)--8000Ԫ ע�� ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From Awdemo@optonline.net Mon Dec 12 06:43:25 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Elm5V-0008Gk-Fg; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:43:25 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA09076; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:42:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Elm6H-00004t-B9; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:44:14 -0500 Received: from [219.134.115.107] (helo=lh) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Elm5R-0008Dt-80; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:43:22 -0500 From: "Lacy Rutherford" To: pilc-admin@ietf.org Subject: Re: Our last email Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:42:50 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_LIFDUIBS.IPAARUGB" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_LIFDUIBS.IPAARUGB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your specific position has been appraised to the essential peoples, and upon wise thought, we are able to suggest to you the consequent opportunity. Based upon wise thought you certify to get a considerable return on your initial property investment. By completing the consequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to conclude our appraisal, and we feel convinced you will get not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will perform all your holiday needs and more! Please go here to conclude this step of the settlement. With sincerest regards, Lacy Rutherford Should you prefer not to take advantage of this holiday opportunity you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_LIFDUIBS.IPAARUGB Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your specific position has been appraised to the essential peoples, and upon wise thought, we are able to suggest to you the consequent opportunity.

Based upon wise thought you certify to get a considerable return on your initial property investment.

By completing the consequent attached form in a timely manner we will be able to conclude our appraisal, and we feel convinced you will get not only a lower rate of interest, but also a cash return that will perform all your holiday needs and more!

Please go here to conclude this step of the settlement.

With sincerest regards,

Lacy Rutherford

Should you prefer not to take advantage of this holiday opportunity you can go here. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_LIFDUIBS.IPAARUGB-- From aa@ss.com Mon Dec 12 12:26:53 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ElrRt-0002Jm-C2 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:26:53 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([60.177.61.95]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20257 for ; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:25:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:25:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512121725.MAA20257@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAtc2829eqyMO8uLj2vq3TqrK7tO21xM341b6jrL/J1fvM?= =?GB2312?B?5cLyo6zSsr/J0tS1pbbAwvJAQEBAQEBAQEA=?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:26:54 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com) ��ݶ��www.ye2.net) ��ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn) ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn) �й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com) �ƹ��(www.itsend.com) ��ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Tue Dec 13 03:08:37 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Em5DB-00084i-P2 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:08:37 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA15524 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:07:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Em5A2-0007Cs-0a; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:05:22 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Em59z-0007B6-RY for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:05:19 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA15289 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:04:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em5As-0005Hu-6N for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:06:17 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1010:e579:e289:7d8a:fb6b]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A138115263; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:04:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:04:50 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Soliman, Hesham" In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15 Cc: IPv6 WG Subject: Re: Fwd: Request To Advance: X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:18:28 -0500, >>>>> "Soliman, Hesham" said: >> > => Good points. I agree with that. So to keep it >> consistent, I'll remove this distinction >> > between host and router. >> >> Okay, but please clarify my first question, too: >> >> >> First of all, which part of the main text specifies this >> behavior? As >> >> far as I can see, the only text that explicitly mentions ICMPv6 >> >> destination unreachable error to be sent is in Section >> 7.2.2, where >> >> the error is sent upon retransmit timeout for NS messages >> (which is >> >> clearly a different scenario than this one). > => This can be added to the text at the beginning of 7.2., which discusses this issues. Hmm, so the behavior corresponding to the following entry (shown again just to be accurate) is not currently described in the draft: INCOMPLETE NA, Solicited=any, Send ICMP error unchanged Override=any, No (if router) or Link-layer address log error (if host) then...we should discuss whether this behavior makes sense in the first place. Perhaps you added this entry based on a previous discussion, but I don't remember such consensus. So it would be great if you can provide a pointer to the discussion. In any case, I personally don't think this behavior makes sense. It at least violates a SHOULD requirement of Section 7.2.4 of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-05.txt: If the target's Neighbor Cache entry is in the INCOMPLETE state when the advertisement is received, one of two things happens. If the link layer has addresses and no Target Link-Layer address option is included, the receiving node SHOULD silently discard the received ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ advertisement. [...] Since the state is INCOMPLETE, this node should be doing link-layer address resolution by sending multicast NSs. In this case, the responder MUST include the target link-layer address option per Section 7.2.4: If the solicitation's IP Destination Address is a multicast address, the Target Link-Layer option MUST be included in the advertisement. So, the event of receiving an NS with no link-layer address in this state indicates the responder shows a non-compliant behavior. I believe it makes more sense to discard the bogus packets silently as described in the body of the draft (Section 7.2.4) rather than taking a specific action like sending an ICMPv6 error message. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From vleybag@aikfriidrott.com Tue Dec 13 04:01:13 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Em624-0004Wt-BV for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:01:13 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA21641 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:00:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from hse-ottawa-ppp158719.sympatico.ca ([64.229.135.120] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em62w-00073H-9A for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:02:08 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5ffed$724e6700$0100007f@localhost> From: "Sean Clark" To: Subject: Buy OEM Software Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:01:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FFED.724E6700" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FFED.724E6700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 44 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 41 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 32 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FFED.724E6700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
1 Office Pro 2003
2 Adobe Photoshop 9.0
3 Windows XP Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
5 Flash MX 2004
6 Corel Draw 12
7 Norton Antivirus 2005
8 Windows 2003 Server
9 Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
10 Adobe Illustrator 11
See more by this manufacturer
Microsoft
Symantec
Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $550.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 49 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $200.00
OurPrice: $49.95
YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 44 revie! ws)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
   by Adobe

ListPrice: $599.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 46 reviews)
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5FFED.724E6700-- From jimdismuke@berngruber.com Tue Dec 13 06:46:20 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Em8bs-0005NM-1x for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:46:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA10592 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:45:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from [62.117.116.176] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Em8ce-0004PQ-LB for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:47:10 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c60004$8d78a100$0100007f@localhost> From: "Devin James" To: Subject: 0EM Software Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:45:56 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60004.8D78A100" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60004.8D78A100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 34 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 39 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 41 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60004.8D78A100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
1 Office Pro 2003
2 Adobe Photoshop 9.0
3 Windows XP Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
5 Flash MX 2004
6 Corel Draw 12
7 Norton Antivirus 2005
8 Windows 2003 Server
9 Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
10 Adobe Illustrator 11
See more by this manufacturer
Microsoft
Symantec
Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $550.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 33 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $200.00
OurPrice: $49.95
YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 42 revie! ws)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
   by Adobe

ListPrice: $599.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 50 reviews)
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60004.8D78A100-- From Vlseqo@optonline.com Tue Dec 13 09:10:16 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmArA-0008Sy-Js; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:10:16 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA28025; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:09:11 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512131409.JAA28025@ietf.org> Received: from c-7d7fe455.78-0113-74657210.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se ([85.228.127.125] helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmAs2-0001GM-LN; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:11:11 -0500 From: "Sophia Benson" To: rddp-request@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Thanks Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:09:39 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_BWBGRSEQ.LJBDXJRF" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_BWBGRSEQ.LJBDXJRF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your existant homeloan makes the grade for you to receive considerable yields. Our system will connect you with the most certified company, so that you will have more wealth in your bank account at the end of each month. It really is that smooth.. Thousands of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their residences every day. Now its your go. This brief 1 minute form will be your next action towards true percuniary security. With warmest regards, Sophia Benson Should you prefer not to get hold of this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_BWBGRSEQ.LJBDXJRF Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your existant homeloan makes the grade for you to receive considerable yields.

Our system will connect you with the most certified company, so that you will have more wealth in your bank account at the end of each month.

It really is that smooth..

Thousands of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their residences every day.

Now its your go.

This brief 1 minute form will be your next action towards true monetary security.

With warmest regards,

Sophia Benson

Should you prefer not to get hold of this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_BWBGRSEQ.LJBDXJRF-- From sylv.ler@amsllco.com Tue Dec 13 15:24:40 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmGhU-0005hE-El for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:24:40 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA16788 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:23:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from [82.118.112.35] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmGiX-00076N-SX for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:25:46 -0500 Received: from [205.248.102.79] (port=25 helo=mailc.microsoft.com) by mailc.microsoft.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:31:02 +0000 Received: from [32.97.182.141] (port=25 helo=e1.ny.us.ibm.com) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:31:02 +0000 Message-ID: <000001c6004d$04398c80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Lane Sanders" To: Subject: Don't get left behind! Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:31:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6004D.04398C80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6004D.04398C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing- no more ripoffs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere! A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results. Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind! As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself! Here's the link to check out! http://www.befaso.net/pt/?46&hqdouu ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6004D.04398C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing - no more tip-offs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere!

A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results.

Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind!

As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself!

Here's the link to check out!

Name	Patches	Regular	Now
Steel Package	10 Patches	$79.95	$49.95	Free shipping
Silver Package	25 Patches	$129.95	$99.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Gold Package	40 Patches	$189.95	$149.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Platinum Package	65 Patches	$259.95	$199.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included

Endeavor Societies addition Christian pledge following special ways they forward ever held before member For sake character future success well supreme cause keep pledge unflinchingly Endeavor persistently but courteously seek after ask our prayers advice meeting Never discontinue endeavors get new Follow continually name Lord day think speak act pray Savior present plans effective Build standard noble living Send comforting messages sorrow flowers sick funeral after an orphans visit widows to fatherless write letters a invitation condolence the establish missions new es growing parts city hold kindness least thousand personal friends Baptist Select leading duty follow waiting asked Make yourself master some line Christian effort Save Five these ago started Logan suburb Philadelphia successful was their soon grew flourishing Ushers strongest helpful organizations furthering ushers twenty-four banded together businesslike mutual pleasure good fellowship also better conduct in!
 terests they hand They under leader

cause The Missionary Circle combines in one organization all interested in missionary work One afternoon a month the meet in the Lower to sew have supper together and afterward hold religious services The are advised in the hand-book to-- Suggest plans for raising money arrange for a series of addresses organize of childrens societies distribute missionary the literature maintain a circulating library of missionary books correspond with missionaries solicit and work for the missionary barrels send out comfort bags advocate missions in the prayer meetings and socials encourage are preparing for or are going into foreign fields and maintain special missionary prayer meetings of the have started several missions some of have already grown into flourishing es The Logan Baptist and the Tioga Baptist are both daughters of The The Samaritan Aid Society sews and secures contributions of clothing and such supplies for the Samaritan Hospital Other charities however needing such help f!
 ind it ever willing to lend aid It

is ready for any emergency that may arise A hurry call was sent once for sheets pillow cases and garments for the sick at Samaritan Hospital The President of the Society quickly summoned the Merchants were visited and contributions of muslin and thread secured Sewing machines were sent to the Lower An all-day sewing bee was held could came all day others dropped in as time permitted and by sunset more than three hundred pieces of work were finished Two other organizations very helpful to the of the are the Mens Beneficial and the Womens Beneficial They are purely for the benefit of during sickness or bereavement and are managed as all such s are paying $500 a week during sickness and $100 at death The books are closed at the end of each year and the fund started afresh The Building and Loan was organized by the hip of the Business Mens and is officered by prominent of the But it is not in any way a organization and is not under the management of the It is very successful and!
  stockholders are composed largely

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6004D.04398C80-- From horst.richter@accim.com Tue Dec 13 15:48:43 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmH4l-00039C-4F for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:48:43 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA19886 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:47:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from nsg93-3-82-226-5-242.fbx.proxad.net ([82.226.5.242] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmH5d-0007wD-3l for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:49:39 -0500 Received: from [205.248.102.79] (port=25 helo=mailc.microsoft.com) by mailc.microsoft.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:47:44 +0100 Received: from [32.97.182.141] (port=25 helo=e1.ny.us.ibm.com) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:47:44 +0100 Message-ID: <000001c60050$7fe90880$0100007f@localhost> From: "Blake Long" To: Subject: Be the "biggest" out of all your friends Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:47:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60050.7FE90880" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60050.7FE90880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing- no more ripoffs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere! A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results. Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind! As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself! Here's the link to check out! http://www.befaso.net/pt/?46&hahpj ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60050.7FE90880 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing - no more tip-offs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere!

A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results.

Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind!

As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself!

Here's the link to check out!

Name	Patches	Regular	Now
Steel Package	10 Patches	$79.95	$49.95	Free shipping
Silver Package	25 Patches	$129.95	$99.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Gold Package	40 Patches	$189.95	$149.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Platinum Package	65 Patches	$259.95	$199.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60050.7FE90880-- From aa@ss.com Wed Dec 14 03:13:32 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmRlU-000891-Uf for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:13:32 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.191.86.123]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA16801 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:12:22 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512140812.DAA16801@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?xbfSsM34LS2159fT08W73civoaLTxbvd0MXPoryv1tDTqg==?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:13:24 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] ŷҰ��--��Ѷ��

ŷҰ��--��Ѷ��

ŷҰ��Ǽ��֡��һ��ĺ��Ѷ��

��Ż�ȯ��Ż��Ϣ��̼��Ϊ��ģ��ʱ��

��ѹ��ͷ��

ŷҰ�� http://www.51oyea.com

�绰��0571-85126879

��QQ:1283511

From aa@ss.com Wed Dec 14 04:57:12 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmTNo-0006Jk-On for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:57:12 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.191.86.123]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA27825 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:56:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:56:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512140956.EAA27825@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?QEBAQEBAQEC1zbzb16rIw7y4uPa+rdOqsru07bXEzfjVvqOsv8nV+8zlwvKj?= =?GB2312?B?rNKyv8nS1LWltsDC8kBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:57:00 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com) ��ݶ��www.ye2.net) ��ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn) ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn) �й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com) �ƹ��(www.itsend.com) ע�� ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From essextec@aspenonellc.com Wed Dec 14 06:49:56 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmV8u-000548-6O for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 06:49:56 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA11027 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 06:48:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from ppp83-237-202-244.pppoe.mtu-net.ru ([83.237.202.244] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmV9k-0002eO-6A for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 06:50:58 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c600cd$d6485c80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Fabian Williams" To: Subject: Need S0ftware? Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:52:46 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C600CD.D6485C80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C600CD.D6485C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 46 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 35 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 47 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C600CD.D6485C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
	1	Office Pro 2003
	2	Adobe Photoshop 9.0
	3	Windows XP Pro
	4	Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
	5	Flash MX 2004
	6	Corel Draw 12
	7	Norton Antivirus 2005
	8	Windows 2003 Server
	9	Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
	10	Adobe Illustrator 11
	See more by this manufacturer
	&! nbsp;	Microsoft
		Symantec
		Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 44 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 39 rev! iews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 41 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C600CD.D6485C80-- From aa@ss.com Wed Dec 14 11:33:59 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmZZn-0000fs-8K for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:33:59 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.191.86.123]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA19579 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:32:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512141632.LAA19579@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?yqW1rr/swNY=?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:33:53 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.2 [cn] ��ݶ��(http://www.ye2.net)�ͼ��ת�� ϵ�绰:0571-87797916 13516877179 qq:460560908 114103407 ��渽��ϸ��: ��ݶ��www.Ye2.net��ڶ��£��û��Ķ��ֽ��Ϣ��"��ػ��ʵ��"Ϊ��ּ��Ϊ��ṩ�ḻ�Ķ��Ϣ��з��ѯ��Ϣ��ǹ��ǿ��Ĺ��ܵĶ��ѯ��վ�� ڹ滮��ݶ��(www.ye2.net)ʱ,��ڰ��Ϊ��㽭ʡ��޵��֪��ȵĶ��Ʒ��г��վ!��ڴ��ʱ��,��վӵ��һ��ȶ��Ĺ̶��û�� վĿǰ��9��࣬��仯��ơ��ɲο��й�վ��ͳ�Ʒ��http://alexa.chinaz.com/Index.asp?domain=ye2.net��baidu.google.yahoo��У��ؼ��"��ݶ��""��ݶ��Ϣ""�㽭��""��Ϣ��""��ݶ��"�ȶ��ǰ�С� ��ڹ�˾�ص�Ѿ��ں��.��Ѷ��www.51oyea.com��ϣ��Զ��ھ�Ӫ��Ҳû�кúõĿ��Χ�г��ܹ�˾��ƣ��ת�ú��ݶ��ϣ��м��ʽ�Ĺ�˾��ת��ݰ��£� 1�� ݶ��www.ye2.net�� 2�� ݶ��Դ�� 3�� ݶ��QQȺ 4�� ݶ��LOGO 5�� ݶ��FTP�ռ� 6�� ݶ��̴��Ȩ 7�� ݶ��Ȩ 8�� ݶ��㣺 1�� ۲죬��ݻ�û�бȽ�רҵ��ϵͳ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��Զ��һЩ�ʵ��޸ģ��ص�ͻ��ַ��ּҵ硢��ֵ��ԡ��ֳ��ְ��Ƹ��Ŀ��Ӧ��û��Ĳ��롣 2�� վ��λ��ҳ��ͨ��ҳ��λ��ҳ�� 3�� վͼƬ�Ƽ�� 4�� www.ye2.net��û�е��ƣ��Ϊ��ת�ã�Ҳ�� 5�� Ŀͻ��Ƚϼ��У��Ҫ�Ƕ��г��·�ɻ��г��һ·�ɻ��г��ɻ��г��չ�˾��塣�ص��Щ��Ա��Ż��յ��Ч�� 6�� ͨ��վ��QQȺ��Խ��ж��ֽ��,Ҳ��˾��һ�� 7�� ݶ��˾��վ��,��һ��Ŀ,��. From pavoni@dmbinc.com Wed Dec 14 13:26:47 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmbKx-0004Uw-PV; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:26:47 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA05753; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:25:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmbLy-0002qo-UU; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:27:51 -0500 Received: from adsl196-175-201-206-196.adsl196-7.iam.net.ma ([196.206.201.175]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EmbKG-00082Z-Lt; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:26:08 -0500 Received: by 10.11.98.2 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:25:26 -0600 Message-ID: <815e452u.4924546@msn.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:25:26 -0600 From: "Vicky Jacobson" User-Agent: Apple Mail (2.728) X-PGP-Key: 1JPMP9oWGdhRo6Qg12XmUouKDyi6TUnOFpocfxwJyQFFI9TrAZ5br4h4zgX3dB2E== X-Load: 80% MIME-Version: 1.0 To: imss-web-archive@ietf.org Cc: in@ietf.org, ing@ietf.org, ing-admin@ietf.org, internet-drafts@ietf.org, internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Pre-approved Application #qztwggL47565 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------AttPart_86654197==.OLA" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AttPart_86654197==.OLA Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

the conakry but did in twinkle in locus it disquisition try osteology it's pillsbury some polopony or array in dissociable it's harvard in sectoral , assay in abject Or maybe not

--------------AttPart_86654197==.OLA Content-Type: image/gif; name="dugan.3.gif" Content-ID: <8.0.0.09.0.80816237976586.37509738@hallelujah.msn.com.1> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dugan.3.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlh5gHOAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zZv8zM/8AM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZzJmZ mZlmzGZmzGZmZmYzzDMzMzMAzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAADmAc4AAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrfIalKw2K9FCINkEaVuCSMpeVPc8SmjZIrBXDMButxI5BdLWSxoidncUVoWG h4iJQglgeV8Uf10UDQ2SdHVrJWEklZCAJ3ZwAHKfbnuPWYBYX41fEpGpgVmsWgmMkLSiiru8 vb67kCOUAG6fAFwkbpejsyXFKqGchCKvy3KMfMSTwtqlwSRdn3sj37/m5+jpRuVt29TIIspj cs7uKWmysstxew10z8ncgTnxR8S4QMbUKVzIsCGLb2DEAGTWiNylgeECJjyxJ2Odaa9QsJsY z93BEv4M/2Yb6LCly5fpBpU0hvEghUvjsIgiyRFCgoxYqOka0UVjPXHZ7t0RNhSm06dQl+Ci 120Ey4w3+d0xxtPEOFMJggIoSnCnvZkGm45xRHZs1qhw48r98a1BtoksTWGhM9VMua6astkR C2ajSqOI23LKdtBuG8NzI0uevIId2nfCajHjuqmqipN6ZL21epYnwIrJCh5L6kYt5dewJ1v+ yObnNNG2sqBhg4WmhGU6wel+d9B2UlnHaRP1JFoc7y58KsWeTj3uFmOCbl4nbapz90mD2GUX TkIPPtLNRG+yvdVgeDFd9lWfT18dK599WI1iZW3/l/L83ffFRtj895gJ94HCCv9XCeYHQUIC fvEPZPVVaOGFGGao4YYcdujhhyCGKOKIJJZo4okopqjiiiy26OKLMOKgWokGplBjEj9RWMhP 8sUYRXd2caGFe67pEAuNJxGUJBJHKgKWjzvWddNeJfXowoyf6biEdL7caNVKyTGpZRXy3IAl lDlQOZYrwoQJw5lqjJkEl714GQeYTcB5SJk26IlmDW4IBsklv60QloxyxnAoDG7W2eiXeSaq wqM+8CkEpTJg2iFLx8DBCAt+vinpC6GCUqQidpahaRClsuDGEZYC8aoOdJZ42m2FsreRIGfo lFWhH5Ujh0epxcIesD8Nq16vXPwjiT9bhFVbHvAwM07/UnagQokkK21jigndhZUKMoOZ8axV nxhoG7DCfbNuWIAMa1i41PhVnCSFFqYNSFoYU8uQggDy7WayxBcQHQG79Ucs1VJDh7lHSjKJ rgXfRDF7uWlWYkhuCcxGQTyWoJoko3QiBpf/mXFZG4VWI9CUxuZBTSkfewxfr7wFMxgxMlOp r1VsmFGJRByrNusYd45yRo71Kn1yVj//F3KtdQj8Kx/fyvzRRtMYyHFht8LnTUngejuJGURH hysgJD94sNM8+7QNl5YanMlHZM/MM3slg/ybyj2f6mFvdg3k9ndnjYWdKFAvNdqZN9YK8m0q K95HLF7SSTflzIpReTts25XQ/69jI5iJPBxDnZQ7qv2X3WiBXLNaN0crbfo3M+Yheeh51w40 JsdcEtTRqlFdZfCZ7ffRyWG+NWNWsyKuSm1bhXKy4B5C8lsx1KswY62qa2IM5Mftrg1TeldV UOZwbI4+e4k7fcaNpOcjcnRBP5gHNkmn3zr+KagEILLCK20ITxeBS99+zFe8afhuJm6zx6uI 9wnjGfAYnDHgJH4DO4PQ4XkSceBt0Hc+Z9DDgiNaxTvGV6hhgANbjFOFt85Qja2hZG7ayVkI f7emQCwtJziUFgmPprIHaqIgKrQd3BRzQY6B5UnKM8gntFbEg7BLeb2JIlFyhSXUfYx6udHh EkXYo//gEKyHz0iiBZ/xM629Yn5LkmLT5FimGg6DTnasBLOAp6K31IpiN9wDveSgtkHxLBXQ CSQXm+WeiZFrFutSofX2xUHd9MsUlWxY8pblLE8MZzkL++Ico0GKUAjikFfc1yOC1K9DNgmU wYEEI12JrDXY4R2pxCB6QJMKMMitM8vZhh5YQ8AOWutByCCFwmxxLnpRDF8hNOSf6PM8w7hQ IWJRYhWwN81uVuEgEalHQ6iULCukypvo3BE0TaA1hgzTCrFKpzznSc962vOe+MynPvfJz376 858aEuAPyukEgf7AoEpalazaCVASjecYrZTBznpgCoUCYaI9wKjI7qaEijb/1ES3kJI0FUWs HdzCogMt6Q46ARnpoNQHvmwIQz96BDO2xgZZpMtLfZBTnsavh1CI4zkCBaWd9sComeBYDXra A6EigakscFsLoHqYoBr1BVKdQVZZkJIYGRFWI3yTLK30Aqoa6aor/SkKAAOKnzo1CW/FAVtd pdYQ6RGRTUpYHN4IP0o0q5DAetanCAmuV2wDX8SZ2LkMldc3eG44r6yYNNnDh35FA7FeMexJ MOuWcrwxslqZ1pFyqtdjdVY3pcVX4rLjE4mxEJg+5IIMf3UvjpLjLq7tLGIt28pnkiE1p+NW YgkxLPkwjRmcRY9mW3skysbDsMwaaRVkpy+fcbGy/8HYnghl+JuaKTE+XkuIHcLyIKvtUG8h W0FbdOIXnHUtftlCzSv8covthQM6MdXEKZqB33H0F7v77WBrMjJfoJgtD0VpDSlaAS0ET2MW fiFQK4xDiu78rCQBZmYxAWuwebxDWzrpBB8awd6iQCcYDJaG9m5S4MbpbhWoGcNhuRDhQPp1 gw5mm4PFteIBx/UJ7vMg8uw3o+gFkRjKrJzM7qCL2rHyvNKLKq7aJ8ztmiCnZIEYbcOIuLDO ThuZ/NdSUAPV79w4DVk0z9mg55NbXYe08SNqT4tSkY1wSs5v+Up1vaK28RGiKJJc83Uk9sN5 7VnLIZziHfZRXbIQFQ0DRP/mFkasWVvsedKHCDLyJAiSDCYWa4e1GiPrejSBQk+EMeDUX6q8 ssyki1+GfVqsFTwgPm+R1g/CNVJarZV+nKLWaf61T8IJOn7c5xYIizMQafJgN3FqdmoqjlqX TZqtWQLFwtZwGAAzkTUYDCB9CdOtbssR8Pj1PmzrsWeCNZspaLrKU8xGO+so3h8CsDy5Sk6Z XGe2D7YwXo9qSyI7RjCV2pAZYsiu89ITi2ySo4XjaDghJJ4WXhNOkIZUWaA/hkxmcVBQHNcJ fJQNaiR+o90i/4jaRuwuod60NdwlTidwyPFBxefR9VgdDU8t76+cadwVvzIyWuO5Myg8hHcZ lG7/6O1DJnSnsxR7J7tBCT/7elLS6SGsfs2233RbXSAUita+8PG6JXlBEF2ebWYi2g48qAeH rQyNcNeOObGngdDDzZhu8H7a8zQSjmLXg3wk1nImn5adQ1Jzsj0ezGC4/TsiGxJEr/Od74QJ XwFTFuJfrZlBzJwQlidYEju8kM/N9ILLa0KD7rTVwu2H0QMqEJKjg5+qJUNCJ3hQrfNzCWwg TD+FS0iBhFejBcVOvDVy/fEXA/Bd7b5w2NKPgrbqe9HVYfeLkSr0y5Au4Ggf+8rPfilch5/w Y1/8ww9+7kURfv7ZhbxSNX4guBGPUaEqZ/NiHTdpyv+l1lVDfYUCvEJW//1XgDbwSQaYgAZ4 TQrYgA74gBAYgRI4gRRYgRZ4geiQXuBgf06HVjhCehm1f3yUURyIKh7IIYLAGJpEBFBEDv8X BXpVHhfRMO9yAjX4XCN1gwiigVfQbgLogzYgL+ykYuy3gqonVKdHIrYBDiJoUsb0gkD2N76j JodzL4dUWFfIM1n4E1mIEiUYA5tDgCOoA69ACY5RHrfhGDd1fWA2BanSKiDyaFy4BPEEh07w B59SD8ZkILXHE30oTP8AiLw2FmKIA2G4AihUA1NiTZ9EZfCRGYVoBG/4hRmSRblkBHX4hYsy BBJyeWpSHuKAb5ogiiOkMqU4FMYUgrlXHiS0A/+TwIA8Ixbgoz8epnqQwk6UmCG+lItyZUx2 iItFgEnIN2Tg8FzSkBrSMIf6UIT1EIk4NRRHU2pNyFWzNDOzcoZ3go1apAR0kiq1xyIncSyy 9g7ygXa09FiidjzWYnCCxXJApEniuDPNsljmkkuaN4cd5EIOt48j1Bv9CB7HSHeEkFq2FSyL lI/Tklifty04CF+MhEnGtVhq2DXHYQY38jmiYY/QNXPCE1E/sU6Vp2U04YwgYjQvU3QWgRJL sz8naTklJA+V44cfcxPh5ZKIERFaowx+g0mECC5ywzZ8oY3Y0o/MyBT7uDCc0GRQc116oYxa aDmAkxzSMTDRmIbexYP/c1gQLNlSfsVMVcImX4KRN5KVG3E3NZRlTJkeHNONEPcwL1I8ooBE cNBBZ8FApSMPj2NnHDd5yAAnu8NG0LIdoTJYWHceXbVu2jgR72cPi4kd+pYVoyEWqRhSs5VK QVaV79Met1d30iUMoaNmr1iKfgWKJgRacGk/kflgydZ0/aNLMXKaRDE9KTkG9baBLikWeDk+ BOJYrhmbVxaX8bIHoOdlgzliyTEamxh0JXNE6NIpzSksu5lwnmZMz2A0VDFEqJY3wPNV6lNB +eWFvfmS9mAx47kM1WkYsDkrnCZkJdSNSfGLJJKTUvI06IgGN7OG1jVyaGFHq6ULaINkQBUQ /2KkF0JxMmzjJhODTPswGtgiQ/e2ljmRM/cmSdDYOPEmRyqpDXwQEg6XekYWiMl2n7aXmZVl nKkBL0qlnfrCh8IklfbGToIhRm3EGBU0De5JDlNEktkDD+IYTASKhobUo6h0S4L1LAP3dt3S GOnBMtX4ORRzSoHUmUNmHlQ2WX5UjZOUkfIRd/igeUy6MPZyReFyLmswcguzbYv1pavAm0Da mbXjpetYWFdHhE+nGVInXLUgjMkUC5eIgWt1pToqK42Siox1IrConX46GQCRok2Qh2TIi9Vx qIlKHQM4qZZ6qZiaqZq6qZzaqZ76qaAKqgFAAAPgA6Naqk4gAAUgAP8FmIgMYRuBCiBQ4aou MAAHcKu3agCsygIBcKuougO9egC/GgMFgKu3uqoyIAC3uqtHEADFegDMKgLKaqwHUADD6gPK GgC7YEZO0Vqx+mFPwa0wYA8CQADVOgDmCq28aqvXigMBwK4i0KvRugKqegCk+qzaCgPlqq5I 8K62agAlMKrnOgC2egAGkK/Yyq+KQKvq4ELx1AJJ6BAMyxHL0KuoqqztigLC+gMbCwDKOq/0 yq+2CrIs8LFMUAAFcAIdKwLmmrI/IK+8MLHogCyEugLnNE7TSIwi0LEm2wIrywMr+6sCkLEl 0LO2irAv0LNJoLQk8LMAYK4kmwMHkK8uqwP/Q0sCVbtUOStR33oDNYtVJ4gDFamKU4UTJkCt BYC0KuC0OsC2AGCtJUutBDADTHsEcKuy12qxQLCrAwCwO3C3ANC3hri1MfC1A2W4LXCzwWiV ZPsQZlsC9kqwxeqy06qwBVusGVuvG+uskwsAzrqsI3C5PHuwgWusaksCGEuwBmCvInC5+SoA BvCsaSut0Fq5AcC51Tqt2oq50loA6aqr8ZquBFC5BaurWQu57Rq7rYurQru6wPu5Iluttzq3 qGus89q3z4quvhq6x6qtBbus1vu00zsCBFAABkC6pqJcXiePI2FYlflYzUBYGOMMi/WRcKcL 48GF/XJJZZqRp5cs/9UipElppM21WK4VLTdYj4TiSdsgW7JUDpP0TkMRtNBqsdgrApirve2q rKQKvtVqrpyrvayaweZaqrrrsbE7AFFLu8xarAEAuwS7sZervdT7sbZqrdPqu1MLwihswrka w1MbACm8rJhbrypMtADAtr4rvvfKur16rwBbwtX6ttM7AMUarapqAARbAsLbt+e6uqwKw/AK uzicxVtcwuwarMKqsBkKVL2RRmC0duRFluwZXlEpMk8TLOSFMo8ZTeQ4NFODMx8klTEDaq9m DZtQXb+SxyXER4EMUTTUe3MDRuQ0Q+nDoGf7qxbrr87ruSurxJQ7AO+qrgJQub6qtztbqv8C m69aHLfM+rHlWrAmzMNv67eVu6ujHMYeO7Ui0MoCu6s2zMvv+sKsW76eu8JOu8krC8Lfu6zp OsVZHK9OK7gmEM27rK0mG8vbCwCt3Lp+q8a5GrgGMLcrPJWniEUE9JibaRJ8gQdZmpTDQURL 8TaNbEavc1zbqKI4Y5tJqZ1+RDL1nDNipyf8xjwjqC7KpLOZPALyKsTCar67zKxsq7wkALO7 TLAEW8oKy7O8zM1IPAJKm63T2rcX29HUrKyTm68Wfc29XNK4DK1HWwJX7LbIWwJHi8rXzK4Y fbvPysvU7NE27bcmcNLCTMq+2s3dLM7STKoZ3dKI+EMHpEFDI2D/t3Ge7Jk4IVUG2qWij1Im 0QgUCJQUdiKNY3gm71Z0uaGdXGI8eqIMGyQPN2rVCl3RrOu5LmyyEN2rwAuvXCzDworKvTq7 VqzXrMrX2drLVQvR1cyvZFy6t1vXh/20tgytLcuqOI2xpVvDHQvCHLzLKRus34y+AVutr1vC vayuzgqwnf202Pu53ivU4xzUKEDU2qq3N13XFK3UvQy8yorYkHhDInpcb0QRZYMwL+qa/8kI HBpW60NGsuAxzZg3EZEsj/YbWYRz7fA7+ImQ/sw7efHPJSFv8NEow51f2eQ6x+0OTpnE1Ira 7V26uXqsAbu68v2sfvu9pIvf8o2rI4yr/79ctO1NuqZM2sxru7havsdq39Kcq6ubsgOOqj2N vobttu0NurQbvlQs3/QNzfx9uSTwvVjs3/xN3yqMthk+tSBuyoXt3wo0dtrGafTpFTEzp0nG X9XYHPERUe/cSOn2wJXUXdJESDHG4zwpwBj2Z2HwLINhN4MCkTUIpdFdyWFgPbZ0LanAgxiN 0airwoF7sVs8tCTb1B4r5mM+rENrwlyO0ZZNsNjMxp6b5VwO0ir8roWd0f5aqmrur6VM5v76 wlyeuqK85Wbe0R4723AOsneOtGAurWKe6Gd+vXHO0Du9048+5gJA528e6F2Oy2zO6Fvc4qFa IbldBXWLAs760f8Woo2hXiGXbgi4erwnMLKrPutwoeYlu8K0nuu6vuu83uu+/uvAHuzCPuzE XuzGfuzInuzKvuzM3uzO/uzQHu3SPu3UXu3Wfu3Ynu3avu3c3u3e/u3gHu7iPu7kXu7mfu7o nu7qvu79tAARMAHwHgELMALwXu/1vgAOYO/6Pu8noAAToAL6HvD1Lu8jsAAC/+8PIPAPgAIO 8O7xzu8AYO8k4PATgAAFT/ERoAAi4O8HHwEJH/ALTwLwHvIiYPDw7gAjgAD5Xu8oDwAfPwEr r+8AsPIPgAAwXwIjTwImf/MjEPMwb/Ep4O4sD/Q9b+8OAPQrT/QRX+8l7/Atv/MtDwD/HD8B DzD1ETACFB/wRN/wE3/wE7Dz/37xA6/xUg/vEO/y9a7xBk/2JZLvEeAADc/0ACD0cB/3+P72 cV/3b48C7372JSD0DwD3fZ/wb+/wQI8AhA/3hD/374737x71XY/3LF/yOV/w8Y71E+D4Jz/3 MA/3mS/48t74gs/zRU/6iA/vZG/yih/vCCD0EaDyJ//4AIAAfW/zfr/yUX/6E0D2Nt/5Mc/2 JSD6cU/1ItD7dZ/2Um/4Yn/1Bv/29Y4AtJ/5bB/9X6/7EB8Bmn/8bA/vRI/9o3/8Qk/6wu/0 s+/wEO/6Fm/wSi8iBg/5HA/06k/5CpDxlH/4wD8CHH/1Qb/7/8UPAg4CTA8AONNyniU7RSei ypPDstGk4MtEoyaj3u6k47F8KscNMFudVs9aE5cCGk1OGA6gi82EwVTMCMayrtBsLjI8Xd+s B9pXjritv+GvXBvR5YiRVL34ubzMTSQNXVUtngRGjXAZFSX9QOkMtkD5yHWFio6Slpqeoqaq 4uCFzgx9ytysxZZGPByR+iDhIE69aAEsQP2igM4URlWmgO5urWFGKAwV16yJuP5gOWi1huqs 6DRpExfN8LKEbWvV6iUjh/oIc6bZWFZuAV76QCH2HgYTpkiUjR9JBnbxhUZZGSWcIniCtGoi xYoWL3apxkjZCHhEQHVRIMRHwC7OZv9oQaRDDiJJz8zEoydoBDOTRdqxkvgSxy9vGQsO4tYi 2QmRN0RCIjOnzKtsceB085NQ6jyQAn1OjVTw0AglEURgI1GSBMBRLut5WQjgbAt2Mi0pU2ok Isa6du/aFYkurcF52ux9tFVmzyiHP8b9BfW375a/VINYrVmTCI8UhTlpVNdH1BOkNFMSbWtJ SqVibzsTFurlMVw9gkfp0Jp2XKO/j8bi89eFLSEAIh/zRmRZVKxPciEWZY13OfPmvhcuEBeX G2BMVosurm7zgQPpZNVMZRK7xle5eqzGmoyp8tuq6RbOKI+PJw07KFIqB2xfyYruvTjXx4Vq 431DlXrf6MT/ShmSgEOCHN0dJlpWEobC1hV/7RWcFgda594XXkChgHLOkVjiRPHFBEtQe+HU hThM0JHgenAg4cJTwERRxS/DxDRWEBzZ1JVubdAHzU48ZgMFGQO+JdIaP4j4YR0AKgmDaikY SWFcoriBJUFaSBJGLP6gKFYoufm4VoJWijefmme65aM3tYiDnBNZmpinnqY0GJh7cFzyZyhG 5YSnMwl1Mx+ZXBTjQzIR0ueWkSu1AJ12mWHh6E9rbLKhm2npAeUXMlIpCCKedZHCXiQECuhz Mqna2qtiUAoTqETcZpZOsdZAj4YvWNpELQhsgueexyL7Uwkq+lETAjG+QYexuUQj/4qX9DG1 WQsNSeckoJbCgIR9wBKjQzBKPFAbVZri4G0QC6VQiLmC2BkdGmHEoEQhIoEUb07BbNIEsUMq A9jAd0A6sBYDEyEGGTQB9nDB1OATnSaDhJHqfLWSh8mygPpBbWNKjpisySUi9dc12VW3iVou P6nNg9pIpbJfKrAsRMqOcZldHiyIuNi6Pmv8QzA701w0Piil4zI5FQJBWD1GXugH04osFlrB jkWb3SPa8OKs0DjEaHNj2VVKWGK99rX22UAYpi1f1fFjyXUn4+3cAkwkowDffEOzNxMgCR6W MHzL4TcT0Pw9hOIo/D24E5EzAWAJSROHeGGahwR4OpQTpf+4A9AoYCQCnnNWBZI9DIp6UVn+ jUrhkfGdKudw9MDEqpCPbnvkadTOeyGxC2/F7YdLngTf6CxAjbF5Qx+99M3VPTAMd0+fvfbb c9+99xYhEL7445Nfvvnno5+++uuzX/7e4194ffvz01+//ffjn7/++/Pfv//ify+AOGAAAQto wAMiMIEKXCADG+jAB0IQDxGAIAUraMELYjCDGtwgBzvowQ8eUIAiHCEJS2jCE6IwhSpcIQtb 6MIXwjCGMpwhDWtowxviMIc63CEPe+jDHwIxiEIcIhGLaMQjIjGJSlwiE5voxCdCMYpSnCIV q2jFK2Ixi1rcIhe76MUvgjGMYhz/IxnLaMYzojGNalwjG9voxjfCMY5ynCMd62jHO+Ixj3rc Ix/76Mc/AjKQghwkIQtpyEMiMpEYSYAEEqDIRwoRAhSY5CQbWRdKUrIBJWrAJB0JyU/6kJOO ZCQF7CIBCQCAlJokUQIo4ElQwjKHrXylK+vSAFSeQAKrdM4sY+nLG/YSAA2AgCoa8Eoc3JIF uixRMH/pzBi2kpLLTEUtQ5FMYeKSldV8JjdbGExOElOYlczlJDUpyUmGkwWcHCcy2UnKRjbA mJT0JCcl4EpSUsCejlxnNrvpzxE2k5PYPAEEICBKSZ5gm8hEJTjVicuCAkACxIwmAEoJAIja s5QGlegJ/0RZ0Xgq9J8i7V4zW3lRTLoykwk9pkPJucpzUrKiE6XAS+2Jy2sK9AS9zGg6R+rT 7QVUoz1NJQT0WVGWdhSX0XQkRNvJTo7i9KYWTWU1i0rTn2I1e61cJSM1yUlNMlKSCejlVUNx SnXmMwFfTSUqm6rTWp51oAm1pFjXStOwZjWvJoumNHfJT7Wq9KRlJWhg1wnStAq2nBHNZz35 OkqbRnOdFAhnTvVqWR1WtqjLueZlO2tDj+IVLyH1LGlhCNOhlja1ql0ta1vr2tfCNrayna33 murWU1yTkUilLW/zBNNKItWexBRuFySLSZCicqm9Xe6xQGtPFtg2nLd9qye3Kv/XYE6Tudpd TjOrKt3vimKbV81tNbO73fMusprDFEV0w4tU8u4WvfKlCF8Zy17whqK8lFXqaOfrX1V8c7IE fSl+u4DS/VI3l57MqFJPCdz/+jeoJyUwQVF71FwimKqONGo8NRzNcMYVwugtqUWn2d78vpe/ nlTvOVdMz6mKeLsSjiiFL2rhbW4VvivFpiarWU2Txvi81mXrKjl60Yf2862rXKc4R1nWq0J0 rR/tKIyD3Nv62lecjM1kTF3BCa46NqPDROeHJXlLdFa0k1ZeM5vAv3Q3wznOcp4znets5zvj Oc963jOf++znPwM60IIeNKzYhchDIzrRiyRZOxvt6EcGQzrShAwBADs= --------------AttPart_86654197==.OLA-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 14 19:01:01 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmgYP-00037y-O6 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:01:01 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA15791 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:00:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmgMW-0001Te-Ad; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:48:44 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmgMS-0001Sq-6s for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:48:42 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14576 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:47:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from imr1.ericy.com ([198.24.6.9]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmgNb-00073N-Ll for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:49:52 -0500 Received: from eamrcnt751.exu.ericsson.se (eamrcnt751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.133.52]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBENmGeh021308; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:48:16 -0600 Received: from [142.133.72.115] (dhcp723-115.rnet.lmc.ericsson.se [142.133.72.115]) by eamrcnt751.exu.ericsson.se with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id Y79M24XT; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:48:15 -0600 Message-ID: <43A0AF6C.1020907@ericsson.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:49:00 -0500 X-Sybari-Trust: ab373321 5f038a5a 1a241f06 00000139 From: Suresh Krishnan User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?SklOTUVJIFRhdHV5YSAvIBskQj9ATEBDIzpIGyhC?= References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Scan-Signature: 92df29fa99cf13e554b84c8374345c17 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Jinmei, I was confused by the same inconsistency couple of years ago and a thread resulting from my question failed to clarify the choice. I guess it is something we have to live with. You can look at this thread. http://www.atm.tut.fi/list-archive/ipng/msg10039.html Cheers Suresh JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B wrote: > I believe this was discussed and clarified before, but I could not > find any pointer, so let me ask here... > > It's regarding the "magic number" of 0xFFFE used in the modified > EUI-64 format for the interface identifier of an IPv6 address. > > According to draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-04.txt (or already-published > RFCs), we insert 0xFFFE in the middle of the interface identifier in > order to convert an 48-bit MAC address to the modified EUI-64 format: > > [EUI64] defines a method to create a IEEE EUI-64 identifier from an > IEEE 48bit MAC identifier. This is to insert two octets, with > hexadecimal values of 0xFF and 0xFE, in the middle of the 48 bit MAC > (between the company_id and vendor supplied id). > (in APPENDIX A) > > However, according to [EUI64], we use 0xFFFF (not 0xFFFE) "to create > an EUI-64 identifier from a 48bit MAC identifier" for network devices > (i.e., MAC-48): > > To support encapsulation of EUI-48 and MAC-48 values within small > subsets of the EUI-64 values, the first four digits of the > manufacturer's extension identifier shall not be FFFF16 or > FFFE16. Thus, the 64-bit values of the following form are > never-assigned EUI-64 values: > > ccccccFFFEeeeeee(16) (an EUI-48 extension) > > ccccccFFFFeeeeee(16) (a MAC-48 extension) <==== this one > (from http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/tutorials/EUI64.html) > > My question is whether there was any special reason why the IPv6 > addr-arch document specified 0xFFFE. > > I googled and found a web page saying this is "an error": > > Confusingly IPv6 -- one of the most prominent standards that uses > EUI-64 -- applies these rules inconsistenly. Due to an error in the > appendix to the specification of IPv6 addressing, it is currently > standard practice in IPv6 to extend MAC-48 addresses (such as IEEE 802 > MAC address) to EUI-64 using 'FF-FE' rather than 'FF-FF'; it remains > to be seen how this inconsistency will be resolved in the future. > (http://www.kingj.com/articles/MAC_address) > > Is this true, or was there any particular reason for the "confusing" > choice? > > I appreciate any clarification in advance, > > JINMEI, Tatuya > Communication Platform Lab. > Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. > jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 14 19:45:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmhF3-0000Mn-2r for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:45:05 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA20313 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:44:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmhB5-0008AV-0j; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:40:59 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmhB3-00089u-Kx for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:40:57 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA19881 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:39:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.cluenet.de ([195.20.121.7]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmhCC-0000ZG-24 for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:42:08 -0500 Received: by mail1.cluenet.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id D6C7F17A51; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:40:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:40:28 +0100 From: Daniel Roesen To: ipv6@ietf.org Message-ID: <20051215004028.GA24527@srv01.cluenet.de> Mail-Followup-To: ipv6@ietf.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955 Subject: Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 02:53:07AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H wrote: > According to draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-04.txt (or already-published > RFCs), we insert 0xFFFE in the middle of the interface identifier in > order to convert an 48-bit MAC address to the modified EUI-64 format: > > [EUI64] defines a method to create a IEEE EUI-64 identifier from an > IEEE 48bit MAC identifier. This is to insert two octets, with > hexadecimal values of 0xFF and 0xFE, in the middle of the 48 bit MAC > (between the company_id and vendor supplied id). > (in APPENDIX A) > > However, according to [EUI64], we use 0xFFFF (not 0xFFFE) "to create > an EUI-64 identifier from a 48bit MAC identifier" for network devices > (i.e., MAC-48): "EUI-64" == "IEEE EUI-64" != "modified EUI-64". The modification is exactly the flipped bit. See 2.5.1: Modified EUI-64 format interface identifiers are formed by inverting the "u" bit (universal/local bit in IEEE EUI-64 terminology) when forming the interface identifier from IEEE EUI-64 identifiers. In the resulting Modified EUI-64 format the "u" bit is set to one (1) to indicate universal scope, and it is set to zero (0) to indicate local scope. The first three octets in binary of an IEEE EUI-64 identifier are as follows: and the rationale is right below that: The motivation for inverting the "u" bit when forming an interface identifier is to make it easy for system administrators to hand configure non-global identifiers when hardware tokens are not available. This is expected to be case for serial links, tunnel end- points, etc. The alternative would have been for these to be of the form 0200:0:0:1, 0200:0:0:2, etc., instead of the much simpler 0:0:0:1, 0:0:0:2, etc. I wonder how well-known the special meaning of the upper 3 bits are to folks who work creativly with the 64 bit host ID space... and the consequences of having them != 000 are. :-) An IPv6 address (not derrived from a globally unique ID like ethernet MAC) with the the upper 3 host bits != 000 and u or g bit set to 1 would be wrong. :-) > I googled and found a web page saying this is "an error": > > Confusingly IPv6 -- one of the most prominent standards that uses > EUI-64 -- applies these rules inconsistenly. Due to an error in the > appendix to the specification of IPv6 addressing, it is currently > standard practice in IPv6 to extend MAC-48 addresses (such as IEEE 802 > MAC address) to EUI-64 using 'FF-FE' rather than 'FF-FF'; it remains > to be seen how this inconsistency will be resolved in the future. > (http://www.kingj.com/articles/MAC_address) > > Is this true, or was there any particular reason for the "confusing" > choice? The only confusion exists in the head of the author of above article. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 14 20:33:00 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmhzQ-0005XA-JF for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:33:00 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24347 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:32:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmhqP-0002mN-53; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:23:41 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmhqO-0002m9-25 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:23:40 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23491 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:22:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.cluenet.de ([195.20.121.7]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emhrb-00020b-Fw for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:24:56 -0500 Received: by mail1.cluenet.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id B732F17A40; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:23:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:23:30 +0100 From: Daniel Roesen To: ipv6@ietf.org Message-ID: <20051215012330.GB24527@srv01.cluenet.de> Mail-Followup-To: ipv6@ietf.org References: <20051215004028.GA24527@srv01.cluenet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051215004028.GA24527@srv01.cluenet.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2 Subject: Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:40:28AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > An IPv6 address (not derrived from a globally unique ID like ethernet > MAC) with the the upper 3 host bits != 000 and u or g bit set to 1 > would be wrong. :-) s/upper 3 host bits/upper 3 bits 001 through 111 [except multicast 1111.1111 prefix]/ Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 14 20:43:20 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Emi9Q-0007y3-HZ for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:43:20 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA25229 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:42:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Emi2n-0006c6-J9; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:36:29 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Emi2l-0006bZ-TB for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:36:27 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA24531 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:35:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.cluenet.de ([195.20.121.7]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emi3x-0002Ru-Do for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:37:41 -0500 Received: by mail1.cluenet.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9B44E17A40; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:36:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:36:16 +0100 From: Daniel Roesen To: ipv6@ietf.org Message-ID: <20051215013616.GA25136@srv01.cluenet.de> Mail-Followup-To: ipv6@ietf.org References: <20051215004028.GA24527@srv01.cluenet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051215004028.GA24527@srv01.cluenet.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32 Subject: Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 01:40:28AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > "EUI-64" == "IEEE EUI-64" != "modified EUI-64". > > The modification is exactly the flipped bit. See 2.5.1: Please ignore my comment completely. I was thinking of the u/g bits, which are NOT relevant to the FF-FF and FF-FE thing, unless I also fail to count bits correctly. Nevertheless, the significance of bits #57 and #58 are not widely known to IPv6 operators out there. > The only confusion exists in the head of the author of above article. No, in my head. Looks like a mistake indeed, given that FF-FF is according to IEEE MAC-48, and FF-FE is EUI-48. Sorry for any confusion. Regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 14 21:02:49 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmiSH-0004D5-5g for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:02:49 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA27456 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:01:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmiK0-000225-Ky; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:54:16 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmiJx-00020u-00 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:54:13 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA26459 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:53:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail1.cluenet.de ([195.20.121.7]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmiL6-00035j-Ok for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:55:26 -0500 Received: by mail1.cluenet.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 28A5A17A51; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:53:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:53:59 +0100 From: Daniel Roesen To: ipv6@ietf.org Message-ID: <20051215015359.GA25390@srv01.cluenet.de> Mail-Followup-To: ipv6@ietf.org References: <20051215004028.GA24527@srv01.cluenet.de> <20051215013616.GA25136@srv01.cluenet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051215013616.GA25136@srv01.cluenet.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad Subject: Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:36:16AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > Nevertheless, the significance of bits #57 and #58 are not widely > known to IPv6 operators out there. I cannot count. g-bit is bit #56, not #58. My only excuse for this mail flood is that it's almost 3am local time here. :-Z My apologies. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From oakes@kdcarchitects.com Thu Dec 15 12:38:46 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Emx42-0007P5-Bp; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:38:46 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA08732; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:37:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from [85.103.18.144] (helo=132.151.6.1) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Emx5C-0002dd-HI; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:40:06 -0500 Received: by 10.11.98.8 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:37:40 -0600 Message-ID: <726o843g.4765079@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:37:40 -0600 From: "Rachael Dorsey" User-Agent: Apple Mail (2.728) X-PGP-Key: o385k9JnBSF79w4HB0KhqUthpmYsUywaQs4eOAIB2x5mCldEF5dK4PWnVXG0L8oj== X-Load: 91% MIME-Version: 1.0 To: imss-admin@ietf.org, imss-archive@ietf.org, imss-bounces@ietf.org, imss-web-archive@ietf.org, in@ietf.org, ing@ietf.org, ing-admin@ietf.org, internet-drafts@ietf.org, internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org, ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org, iporpr-admin@ietf.org, iporpr-web-archive@ietf.org Subject: Your account #058304 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------AttPart_39442748==.OLA" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Scan-Signature: d890c9ddd0b0a61e8c597ad30c1c2176 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AttPart_39442748==.OLA Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

not brow not burn ! entranceway try babel be memoranda but curlicue not hampton but actinium ! downey try homework but rectilinear try thebes see crystal try rerouting Or maybe not

--------------AttPart_39442748==.OLA Content-Type: image/gif; name="piquant.1.gif" Content-ID: <8.0.0.06.0.65079334522077.31058625@examination.yahoo.com.5> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="piquant.1.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlh5gHOAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zZv8zM/8AM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZzJmZ mZlmzGZmzGZmZmYzzDMzMzMAzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAADmAc4AAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrfIalKw2K9FCINkEaVuCSMpeVPc8SmjZIrBXDMButxI5BdLWSxoidncUVoWG h4iJQglgeV8Uf10UDQ2SdHVrJWEklZCAJ3ZwAHKfbnuPWYBYX41fEpGpgVmsWgmMkLSiiru8 vb67kCOUAG6fAFwkbpejsyXFKqGchCKvy3KMfMSTwtqlwSRdn3sj37/m5+jpRuVt29TIIspj cs7uKWmysstxew10z8ncgTnxR8S4QMbUKVzIsCGLb2DEAGTWiNylgeECJjyxJ2Odaa9QsJsY z93BEv4M/2Yb6LCly5fpBpU0hvEghUvjsIgiyRFCgoxYqOka0UVjPXHZ7t0RNhSm06dQl+Ci 120Ey4w3+d0xxtPEOFMJggIoSnCnvZkGm45xRHZs1qhw48r98a1BtoksTWGhM9VMua6astkR C2ajSqOI23LKdtBuG8NzI0uevIId2nfCajHjuqmqipN6ZL21epYnwIrJCh5L6kYt5dewJ1v+ yObnNNG2sqBhg4WmhGU6wel+d9B2UlnHaRP1JFoc7y58KsWeTj3uFmOCbl4nbapz90mD2GUX TkIPPtLNRG+yvdVgeDFd9lWfT18dK599WI1iZW3/l/L83ffFRtj895gJ94HCCv9XCeYHQUIC fvEPZPVVaOGFGGao4YYcdujhhyCGKOKIJJZo4okopqjiiiy26OKLMOKgWokGplBjEj9RWMhP 8sUYRXd2caGFe67pEAuNJxGUJBJHKgKWjzvWddNeJfXowoyf6biEdL7caNVKyTGpZRXy3IAl lDlQOZYrwoQJw5lqjJkEl714GQeYTcB5SJk26IlmDW4IBsklv60QloxyxnAoDG7W2eiXeSaq wqM+8CkEpTJg2iFLx8DBCAt+vinpC6GCUqQidpahaRClsuDGEZYC8aoOdJZ42m2FsreRIGfo lFWhH5Ujh0epxcIesD8Nq16vXPwjiT9bhFVbHvAwM07/UnagQokkK21jigndhZUKMoOZ8axV nxhoG7DCfbNuWIAMa1i41PhVnCSFFqYNSFoYU8uQggDy7WayxBcQHQG79Ucs1VJDh7lHSjKJ rgXfRDF7uWlWYkhuCcxGQTyWoJoko3QiBpf/mXFZG4VWI9CUxuZBTSkfewxfr7wFMxgxMlOp r1VsmFGJRByrNusYd45yRo71Kn1yVj//F3KtdQj8Kx/fyvzRRtMYyHFht8LnTUngejuJGURH hysgJD94sNM8+7QNl5YanMlHZM/MM3slg/ybyj2f6mFvdg3k9ndnjYWdKFAvNdqZN9YK8m0q K95HLF7SSTflzIpReTts25XQ/69jI5iJPBxDnZQ7qv2X3WiBXLNaN0crbfo3M+Yheeh51w40 JsdcEtTRqlFdZfCZ7ffRyWG+NWNWsyKuSm1bhXKy4B5C8lsx1KswY62qa2IM5Mftrg1TeldV UOZwbI4+e4k7fcaNpOcjcnRBP5gHNkmn3zr+KagEILLCK20ITxeBS99+zFe8afhuJm6zx6uI 9wnjGfAYnDHgJH4DO4PQ4XkSceBt0Hc+Z9DDgiNaxTvGV6hhgANbjFOFt85Qja2hZG7ayVkI f7emQCwtJziUFgmPprIHaqIgKrQd3BRzQY6B5UnKM8gntFbEg7BLeb2JIlFyhSXUfYx6udHh EkXYo//gEKyHz0iiBZ/xM629Yn5LkmLT5FimGg6DTnasBLOAp6K31IpiN9wDveSgtkHxLBXQ CSQXm+WeiZFrFutSofX2xUHd9MsUlWxY8pblLE8MZzkL++Ico0GKUAjikFfc1yOC1K9DNgmU wYEEI12JrDXY4R2pxCB6QJMKMMitM8vZhh5YQ8AOWutByCCFwmxxLnpRDF8hNOSf6PM8w7hQ IWJRYhWwN81uVuEgEalHQ6iULCukypvo3BE0TaA1hgzTCrFKpzznSc962vOe+MynPvfJz376 858aEuAPyukEgf7AoEpalazaCVASjecYrZTBznpgCoUCYaI9wKjI7qaEijb/1ES3kJI0FUWs HdzCogMt6Q46ARnpoNQHvmwIQz96BDO2xgZZpMtLfZBTnsavh1CI4zkCBaWd9sComeBYDXra A6EigakscFsLoHqYoBr1BVKdQVZZkJIYGRFWI3yTLK30Aqoa6aor/SkKAAOKnzo1CW/FAVtd pdYQ6RGRTUpYHN4IP0o0q5DAetanCAmuV2wDX8SZ2LkMldc3eG44r6yYNNnDh35FA7FeMexJ MOuWcrwxslqZ1pFyqtdjdVY3pcVX4rLjE4mxEJg+5IIMf3UvjpLjLq7tLGIt28pnkiE1p+NW YgkxLPkwjRmcRY9mW3skysbDsMwaaRVkpy+fcbGy/8HYnghl+JuaKTE+XkuIHcLyIKvtUG8h W0FbdOIXnHUtftlCzSv8covthQM6MdXEKZqB33H0F7v77WBrMjJfoJgtD0VpDSlaAS0ET2MW fiFQK4xDiu78rCQBZmYxAWuwebxDWzrpBB8awd6iQCcYDJaG9m5S4MbpbhWoGcNhuRDhQPp1 gw5mm4PFteIBx/UJ7vMg8uw3o+gFkRjKrJzM7qCL2rHyvNKLKq7aJ8ztmiCnZIEYbcOIuLDO ThuZ/NdSUAPV79w4DVk0z9mg55NbXYe08SNqT4tSkY1wSs5v+Up1vaK28RGiKJJc83Uk9sN5 7VnLIZziHfZRXbIQFQ0DRP/mFkasWVvsedKHCDLyJAiSDCYWa4e1GiPrejSBQk+EMeDUX6q8 ssyki1+GfVqsFTwgPm+R1g/CNVJarZV+nKLWaf61T8IJOn7c5xYIizMQafJgN3FqdmoqjlqX TZqtWQLFwtZwGAAzkTUYDCB9CdOtbssR8Pj1PmzrsWeCNZspaLrKU8xGO+so3h8CsDy5Sk6Z XGe2D7YwXo9qSyI7RjCV2pAZYsiu89ITi2ySo4XjaDghJJ4WXhNOkIZUWaA/hkxmcVBQHNcJ fJQNaiR+o90i/4jaRuwuod60NdwlTidwyPFBxefR9VgdDU8t76+cadwVvzIyWuO5Myg8hHcZ lG7/6O1DJnSnsxR7J7tBCT/7elLS6SGsfs2233RbXSAUita+8PG6JXlBEF2ebWYi2g48qAeH rQyNcNeOObGngdDDzZhu8H7a8zQSjmLXg3wk1nImn5adQ1Jzsj0ezGC4/TsiGxJEr/Od74QJ XwFTFuJfrZlBzJwQlidYEju8kM/N9ILLa0KD7rTVwu2H0QMqEJKjg5+qJUNCJ3hQrfNzCWwg TD+FS0iBhFejBcVOvDVy/fEXA/Bd7b5w2NKPgrbqe9HVYfeLkSr0y5Au4Ggf+8rPfilch5/w Y1/8ww9+7kURfv7ZhbxSNX4guBGPUaEqZ/NiHTdpyv+l1lVDfYUCvEJW//1XgDbwSQaYgAZ4 TQrYgA74gBAYgRI4gRRYgRZ4geiQXuBgf06HVjhCehm1f3yUURyIKh7IIYLAGJpEBFBEDv8X BXpVHhfRMO9yAjX4XCN1gwiigVfQbgLogzYgL+ykYuy3gqonVKdHIrYBDiJoUsb0gkD2N76j JodzL4dUWFfIM1n4E1mIEiUYA5tDgCOoA69ACY5RHrfhGDd1fWA2BanSKiDyaFy4BPEEh07w B59SD8ZkILXHE30oTP8AiLw2FmKIA2G4AihUA1NiTZ9EZfCRGYVoBG/4hRmSRblkBHX4hYsy BBJyeWpSHuKAb5ogiiOkMqU4FMYUgrlXHiS0A/+TwIA8Ixbgoz8epnqQwk6UmCG+lItyZUx2 iItFgEnIN2Tg8FzSkBrSMIf6UIT1EIk4NRRHU2pNyFWzNDOzcoZ3go1apAR0kiq1xyIncSyy 9g7ygXa09FiidjzWYnCCxXJApEniuDPNsljmkkuaN4cd5EIOt48j1Bv9CB7HSHeEkFq2FSyL lI/Tklifty04CF+MhEnGtVhq2DXHYQY38jmiYY/QNXPCE1E/sU6Vp2U04YwgYjQvU3QWgRJL sz8naTklJA+V44cfcxPh5ZKIERFaowx+g0mECC5ywzZ8oY3Y0o/MyBT7uDCc0GRQc116oYxa aDmAkxzSMTDRmIbexYP/c1gQLNlSfsVMVcImX4KRN5KVG3E3NZRlTJkeHNONEPcwL1I8ooBE cNBBZ8FApSMPj2NnHDd5yAAnu8NG0LIdoTJYWHceXbVu2jgR72cPi4kd+pYVoyEWqRhSs5VK QVaV79Met1d30iUMoaNmr1iKfgWKJgRacGk/kflgydZ0/aNLMXKaRDE9KTkG9baBLikWeDk+ BOJYrhmbVxaX8bIHoOdlgzliyTEamxh0JXNE6NIpzSksu5lwnmZMz2A0VDFEqJY3wPNV6lNB +eWFvfmS9mAx47kM1WkYsDkrnCZkJdSNSfGLJJKTUvI06IgGN7OG1jVyaGFHq6ULaINkQBUQ /2KkF0JxMmzjJhODTPswGtgiQ/e2ljmRM/cmSdDYOPEmRyqpDXwQEg6XekYWiMl2n7aXmZVl nKkBL0qlnfrCh8IklfbGToIhRm3EGBU0De5JDlNEktkDD+IYTASKhobUo6h0S4L1LAP3dt3S GOnBMtX4ORRzSoHUmUNmHlQ2WX5UjZOUkfIRd/igeUy6MPZyReFyLmswcguzbYv1pavAm0Da mbXjpetYWFdHhE+nGVInXLUgjMkUC5eIgWt1pToqK42Siox1IrConX46GQCRok2Qh2TIi9Vx qIlKHQM4qZZ6qZiaqZq6qZzaqZ76qaAKqgFAAAPgA6Naqk4gAAUgAP8FmIgMYRuBCiBQ4aou MAAHcKu3agCsygIBcKuougO9egC/GgMFgKu3uqoyIAC3uqtHEADFegDMKgLKaqwHUADD6gPK GgC7YEZO0Vqx+mFPwa0wYA8CQADVOgDmCq28aqvXigMBwK4i0KvRugKqegCk+qzaCgPlqq5I 8K62agAlMKrnOgC2egAGkK/Yyq+KQKvq4ELx1AJJ6BAMyxHL0KuoqqztigLC+gMbCwDKOq/0 yq+2CrIs8LFMUAAFcAIdKwLmmrI/IK+8MLHogCyEugLnNE7TSIwi0LEm2wIrywMr+6sCkLEl 0LO2irAv0LNJoLQk8LMAYK4kmwMHkK8uqwP/Q0sCVbtUOStR33oDNYtVJ4gDFamKU4UTJkCt BYC0KuC0OsC2AGCtJUutBDADTHsEcKuy12qxQLCrAwCwO3C3ANC3hri1MfC1A2W4LXCzwWiV ZPsQZlsC9kqwxeqy06qwBVusGVuvG+uskwsAzrqsI3C5PHuwgWusaksCGEuwBmCvInC5+SoA BvCsaSut0Fq5AcC51Tqt2oq50loA6aqr8ZquBFC5BaurWQu57Rq7rYurQru6wPu5Iluttzq3 qGus89q3z4quvhq6x6qtBbus1vu00zsCBFAABkC6pqJcXiePI2FYlflYzUBYGOMMi/WRcKcL 48GF/XJJZZqRp5cs/9UipElppM21WK4VLTdYj4TiSdsgW7JUDpP0TkMRtNBqsdgrApirve2q rKQKvtVqrpyrvayaweZaqrrrsbE7AFFLu8xarAEAuwS7sZervdT7sbZqrdPqu1MLwihswrka w1MbACm8rJhbrypMtADAtr4rvvfKur16rwBbwtX6ttM7AMUarapqAARbAsLbt+e6uqwKw/AK uzicxVtcwuwarMKqsBkKVL2RRmC0duRFluwZXlEpMk8TLOSFMo8ZTeQ4NFODMx8klTEDaq9m DZtQXb+SxyXER4EMUTTUe3MDRuQ0Q+nDoGf7qxbrr87ruSurxJQ7AO+qrgJQub6qtztbqv8C m69aHLfM+rHlWrAmzMNv67eVu6ujHMYeO7Ui0MoCu6s2zMvv+sKsW76eu8JOu8krC8Lfu6zp OsVZHK9OK7gmEM27rK0mG8vbCwCt3Lp+q8a5GrgGMLcrPJWniEUE9JibaRJ8gQdZmpTDQURL 8TaNbEavc1zbqKI4Y5tJqZ1+RDL1nDNipyf8xjwjqC7KpLOZPALyKsTCar67zKxsq7wkALO7 TLAEW8oKy7O8zM1IPAJKm63T2rcX29HUrKyTm68Wfc29XNK4DK1HWwJX7LbIWwJHi8rXzK4Y fbvPysvU7NE27bcmcNLCTMq+2s3dLM7STKoZ3dKI+EMHpEFDI2D/t3Ge7Jk4IVUG2qWij1Im 0QgUCJQUdiKNY3gm71Z0uaGdXGI8eqIMGyQPN2rVCl3RrOu5LmyyEN2rwAuvXCzDworKvTq7 VqzXrMrX2drLVQvR1cyvZFy6t1vXh/20tgytLcuqOI2xpVvDHQvCHLzLKRus34y+AVutr1vC vayuzgqwnf202Pu53ivU4xzUKEDU2qq3N13XFK3UvQy8yorYkHhDInpcb0QRZYMwL+qa/8kI HBpW60NGsuAxzZg3EZEsj/YbWYRz7fA7+ImQ/sw7efHPJSFv8NEow51f2eQ6x+0OTpnE1Ira 7V26uXqsAbu68v2sfvu9pIvf8o2rI4yr/79ctO1NuqZM2sxru7havsdq39Kcq6ubsgOOqj2N vobttu0NurQbvlQs3/QNzfx9uSTwvVjs3/xN3yqMthk+tSBuyoXt3wo0dtrGafTpFTEzp0nG X9XYHPERUe/cSOn2wJXUXdJESDHG4zwpwBj2Z2HwLINhN4MCkTUIpdFdyWFgPbZ0LanAgxiN 0airwoF7sVs8tCTb1B4r5mM+rENrwlyO0ZZNsNjMxp6b5VwO0ir8roWd0f5aqmrur6VM5v76 wlyeuqK85Wbe0R4723AOsneOtGAurWKe6Gd+vXHO0Du9048+5gJA528e6F2Oy2zO6Fvc4qFa IbldBXWLAs760f8Woo2hXiGXbgi4erwnMLKrPutwoeYlu8K0nuu6vuu83uu+/uvAHuzCPuzE XuzGfuzInuzKvuzM3uzO/uzQHu3SPu3UXu3Wfu3Ynu3avu3c3u3e/u3gHu7iPu7kXu7mfu7o nu7qvu79tAARMAHwHgELMALwXu/1vgAOYO/6Pu8noAAToAL6HvD1Lu8jsAAC/+8PIPAPgAIO 8O7xzu8AYO8k4PATgAAFT/ERoAAi4O8HHwEJH/ALTwLwHvIiYPDw7gAjgAD5Xu8oDwAfPwEr r+8AsPIPgAAwXwIjTwImf/MjEPMwb/Ep4O4sD/Q9b+8OAPQrT/QRX+8l7/Atv/MtDwD/HD8B DzD1ETACFB/wRN/wE3/wE7Dz/37xA6/xUg/vEO/y9a7xBk/2JZLvEeAADc/0ACD0cB/3+P72 cV/3b48C7372JSD0DwD3fZ/wb+/wQI8AhA/3hD/374737x71XY/3LF/yOV/w8Y71E+D4Jz/3 MA/3mS/48t74gs/zRU/6iA/vZG/yih/vCCD0EaDyJ//4AIAAfW/zfr/yUX/6E0D2Nt/5Mc/2 JSD6cU/1ItD7dZ/2Um/4Yn/1Bv/29Y4AtJ/5bB/9X6/7EB8Bmn/8bA/vRI/9o3/8Qk/6wu/0 s+/wEO/6Fm/wSi8iBg/5HA/06k/5CpDxlH/4wD8CHH/1Qb/7/8UPAg4CTA8AONNyniU7RSei ypPDstGk4MtEoyaj3u6k47F8KscNMFudVs9aE5cCGk1OGA6gi82EwVTMCMayrtBsLjI8Xd+s B9pXjritv+GvXBvR5YiRVL34ubzMTSQNXVUtngRGjXAZFSX9QOkMtkD5yHWFio6Slpqeoqaq 4uCFzgx9ytysxZZGPByR+iDhIE69aAEsQP2igM4URlWmgO5urWFGKAwV16yJuP5gOWi1huqs 6DRpExfN8LKEbWvV6iUjh/oIc6bZWFZuAV76QCH2HgYTpkiUjR9JBnbxhUZZGSWcIniCtGoi xYoWL3apxkjZCHhEQHVRIMRHwC7OZv9oQaRDDiJJz8zEoydoBDOTRdqxkvgSxy9vGQsO4tYi 2QmRN0RCIjOnzKtsceB085NQ6jyQAn1OjVTw0AglEURgI1GSBMBRLut5WQjgbAt2Mi0pU2ok Isa6du/aFYkurcF52ux9tFVmzyiHP8b9BfW375a/VINYrVmTCI8UhTlpVNdH1BOkNFMSbWtJ SqVibzsTFurlMVw9gkfp0Jp2XKO/j8bi89eFLSEAIh/zRmRZVKxPciEWZY13OfPmvhcuEBeX G2BMVosurm7zgQPpZNVMZRK7xle5eqzGmoyp8tuq6RbOKI+PJw07KFIqB2xfyYruvTjXx4Vq 431DlXrf6MT/ShmSgEOCHN0dJlpWEobC1hV/7RWcFgda594XXkChgHLOkVjiRPHFBEtQe+HU hThM0JHgenAg4cJTwERRxS/DxDRWEBzZ1JVubdAHzU48ZgMFGQO+JdIaP4j4YR0AKgmDaikY SWFcoriBJUFaSBJGLP6gKFYoufm4VoJWijefmme65aM3tYiDnBNZmpinnqY0GJh7cFzyZyhG 5YSnMwl1Mx+ZXBTjQzIR0ueWkSu1AJ12mWHh6E9rbLKhm2npAeUXMlIpCCKedZHCXiQECuhz Mqna2qtiUAoTqETcZpZOsdZAj4YvWNpELQhsgueexyL7Uwkq+lETAjG+QYexuUQj/4qX9DG1 WQsNSeckoJbCgIR9wBKjQzBKPFAbVZri4G0QC6VQiLmC2BkdGmHEoEQhIoEUb07BbNIEsUMq A9jAd0A6sBYDEyEGGTQB9nDB1OATnSaDhJHqfLWSh8mygPpBbWNKjpisySUi9dc12VW3iVou P6nNg9pIpbJfKrAsRMqOcZldHiyIuNi6Pmv8QzA701w0Piil4zI5FQJBWD1GXugH04osFlrB jkWb3SPa8OKs0DjEaHNj2VVKWGK99rX22UAYpi1f1fFjyXUn4+3cAkwkowDffEOzNxMgCR6W MHzL4TcT0Pw9hOIo/D24E5EzAWAJSROHeGGahwR4OpQTpf+4A9AoYCQCnnNWBZI9DIp6UVn+ jUrhkfGdKudw9MDEqpCPbnvkadTOeyGxC2/F7YdLngTf6CxAjbF5Qx+99M3VPTAMd0+fvfbb c9+99xYhEL7445Nfvvnno5+++uuzX/7e4194ffvz01+//ffjn7/++/Pfv//ify+AOGAAAQto wAMiMIEKXCADG+jAB0IQDxGAIAUraMELYjCDGtwgBzvowQ8eUIAiHCEJS2jCE6IwhSpcIQtb 6MIXwjCGMpwhDWtowxviMIc63CEPe+jDHwIxiEIcIhGLaMQjIjGJSlwiE5voxCdCMYpSnCIV q2jFK2Ixi1rcIhe76MUvgjGMYhz/IxnLaMYzojGNalwjG9voxjfCMY5ynCMd62jHO+Ixj3rc Ix/76Mc/AjKQghwkIQtpyEMiMpEYSYAEEqDIRwoRAhSY5CQbWRdKUrIBJWrAJB0JyU/6kJOO ZCQF7CIBCQCAlJokUQIo4ElQwjKHrXylK+vSAFSeQAKrdM4sY+nLG/YSAA2AgCoa8Eoc3JIF uixRMH/pzBi2kpLLTEUtQ5FMYeKSldV8JjdbGExOElOYlczlJDUpyUmGkwWcHCcy2UnKRjbA mJT0JCcl4EpSUsCejlxnNrvpzxE2k5PYPAEEICBKSZ5gm8hEJTjVicuCAkACxIwmAEoJAIja s5QGlegJ/0RZ0Xgq9J8i7V4zW3lRTLoykwk9pkPJucpzUrKiE6XAS+2Jy2sK9AS9zGg6R+rT 7QVUoz1NJQT0WVGWdhSX0XQkRNvJTo7i9KYWTWU1i0rTn2I1e61cJSM1yUlNMlKSCejlVUNx SnXmMwFfTSUqm6rTWp51oAm1pFjXStOwZjWvJoumNHfJT7Wq9KRlJWhg1wnStAq2nBHNZz35 OkqbRnOdFAhnTvVqWR1WtqjLueZlO2tDj+IVLyH1LGlhCNOhlja1ql0ta1vr2tfCNrayna33 murWU1yTkUilLW/zBNNKItWexBRuFySLSZCicqm9Xe6xQGtPFtg2nLd9qye3Kv/XYE6Tudpd TjOrKt3vimKbV81tNbO73fMusprDFEV0w4tU8u4WvfKlCF8Zy17whqK8lFXqaOfrX1V8c7IE fSl+u4DS/VI3l57MqFJPCdz/+jeoJyUwQVF71FwimKqONGo8NRzNcMYVwugtqUWn2d78vpe/ nlTvOVdMz6mKeLsSjiiFL2rhbW4VvivFpiarWU2Txvi81mXrKjl60Yf2862rXKc4R1nWq0J0 rR/tKIyD3Nv62lecjM1kTFySOb46NqPDROeHJXlLdFa0k1ZeM5vUmwf3wznOcp4znets5zvj Oc963jOf++znPwM60IIeNKMlmqhDIzrRiCwuoxvt6EcGQzrShAwBADs= --------------AttPart_39442748==.OLA-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Thu Dec 15 14:25:50 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Emyjc-0000Kv-Ax for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:25:50 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA21444 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:24:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmyfG-0007F6-Ef; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:21:18 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EmyfA-00076Z-V6 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:21:13 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA20704 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:19:44 -0500 (EST) From: sasson_shuki@emc.com Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([168.159.213.200]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EmygA-0006TJ-46 for ipv6@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:22:15 -0500 Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (uraeus.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.14]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id jBFJK16Q012043; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:20:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mercury.eng.emc.com (mercury.eng.emc.com [168.159.100.12]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id jBFJJtlq021075; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by mercury.eng.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:19:52 -0500 Message-ID: <759A0BEC1CF75A43B72C9E94ACB19BEC01BE2F68@srgriese.eng.emc.com> To: Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com, ipv6@ietf.org Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:19:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.1.0.0, Antispam-Data: 2005.12.15.20 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=1%, Reasons='EMC_FROM_00+ -3, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_CRUFT 0' X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2 Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one that applies the fragmentation). The receiving side may reassemble these packets. From at least one implementation (Open BSD) there is no such check. Also the TAHI test doesn't test for this case. All of the above and the common sense says that the receiver should assemble these packets. Hope this helps! Shuki -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:42 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum 1280 bytes right? When an end host receives an IPv6 fragment which is lesser than 1280 bytes ( except the last fragment ) , should it treat it as invalid and drop it or should it still consider the fragment for reassembly. Are there any IPv6 implementations which reassemble them? Thanks, Muthu -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From Pqyate@optonline.com Thu Dec 15 20:20:07 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1En4GV-000583-5u; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:20:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA11278; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:19:06 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512160119.UAA11278@ietf.org> Received: from [220.72.165.222] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1En4Hy-00073o-0M; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:21:40 -0500 From: "Candace Sanford" To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Fw: ... Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:22:35 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_NGOGNBDD.BPSSBEXZ" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_NGOGNBDD.BPSSBEXZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your present homeloan makes the grade for you to receive considerable benefits. Our system will connect you with the most certified financier, so that you will have more money in your statement at the end of each month. Its really that simple.. Hundreds and thousands Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their houses every day. Now its your time. This brief 1 minute form will be your next step towards concrete fiscal security. With kind regards, Candace Sanford Should you decide not to acquire this prospect any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_NGOGNBDD.BPSSBEXZ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your present homeloan makes the grade for you to receive considerable benefits.

Our system will connect you with the most certified financier, so that you will have more money in your statement at the end of each month.

Its really that simple..

Hundreds and thousands Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their houses every day.

Now its your time.

This brief 1 minute form will be your next step towards concrete financial security.

With kind regards,

Candace Sanford

Should you decide not to acquire this prospect any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_NGOGNBDD.BPSSBEXZ-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 16 06:45:27 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnE1e-0007xm-T1 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:45:27 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA07063 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:44:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnDzw-0007LZ-Jd; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:43:40 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnDzu-0007J9-Vg for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:43:39 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA06964 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:42:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay-pt1.siemens.pt ([194.145.62.201] helo=relay1.siemens.pt) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnE1U-00030C-7P for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:45:18 -0500 Received: from fw-mta2.siemens.pt (fw-mta-pt1.siemens.pt [141.29.156.202]) by relay1.siemens.pt (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBGBeVaB022768; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:40:31 GMT Received: from lisi053a.siemens.pt (lisi053a.siemens.pt [141.29.156.193]) by fw-mta2.siemens.pt (Hvm) with ESMTP id jBGBiQr22511; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:44:26 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:42:46 -0000 Message-ID: <0248B0F35AF7B8418CA72E88AC00BF1F8F2775@lisi053a.siemens.pt> Thread-Topic: Fragmented IPv6 packets Thread-Index: AcYBrhJTj7ahuwAETxOu5fM09Y3cTwAhPIew From: "Nuno Garcia" To: , , X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 386e0819b1192672467565a524848168 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi there: I believe the issue is not about fragmentation. The minimum Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of 1280 stated in RFC 2460 = does not stops IPv6 packets to be smaller that 1280 octets - what it = does say is that any link that is supposed to convey IPv6 packets must = accept packets that are at least as big as 1280 octets - what the RFC = says is that if an IPv6 node has a path MTU smaller that 1280 octets, = then the IPv6 packets must be fragmented/reassembled at a layer bellow = IPv6.=20 Actually, is kind of dumb to have a protocol that defines packets to be = as big as 64K and then mostly uses only 1500 bytes, but that another = story, and btw, this was already true for IPv4... Ethernet issue I = suppose... So, if a given payload is to conveyed over a network whose path MTU is = 1280 (but it can be bigger, as far as I know, there is no upper limit) = the sender fragments the payload and encapsulates it in IPv6 packets = whose size is 1280 octets. This does not mean that the last (or any) = packet cannot be 100 octets long, it only says that an IPv6 node, after = running Path MTU Discovery (RFC1981), must fragment its payloads as to = make the IPv6 packets as big as the discovered MTU. So here are my 2 cents, hope it helps, and I take this occasion to wish = you all a very Happy Season, and a wonderful 2006. Greetings! Nuno Garcia PhD Student=20 SIEMENS S.A. INFORMATION and COMMUNICATIONS * RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT 1 * RESEARCH=20 Rua Irm=E3os Siemens, 1 Ed. 1, Piso 0 Alfragide 2720-093 Amadora Portugal=20 Phone: +351-21 416 7159 Fax: +351-21 424 2082=20 e-mail: Nuno.MGarcia@siemens.com=20 -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = sasson_shuki@emc.com Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2005 19:20 To: Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com; ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one = that applies the fragmentation). The receiving side may reassemble these = packets. From at least one implementation (Open BSD) there is no such = check. Also the TAHI test doesn't test for this case. All of the above and the common sense says that the receiver should = assemble these packets. Hope this helps! Shuki -----Original Message----- From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:42 AM To: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU = of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum = 1280 bytes right? When an end host receives an IPv6 fragment which is = lesser than 1280 bytes ( except the last fragment ) , should it treat it = as invalid and drop it or should it still consider the fragment for = reassembly. Are there any IPv6 implementations which reassemble them? Thanks, Muthu -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From cky-michi@beachacresresort.com Fri Dec 16 06:51:43 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnE7i-0002A7-1s for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:51:43 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA07856 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:50:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from rub-rs1.optitel.ru ([81.90.15.250] helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnE9I-0003Lk-CD for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:53:21 -0500 Received: from [205.248.102.79] (port=25 helo=mailc.microsoft.com) by mailc.microsoft.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:52:04 +0300 Received: from [32.97.182.141] (port=25 helo=e1.ny.us.ibm.com) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:52:04 +0300 Message-ID: <000001c60261$0d02ac00$0100007f@localhost> From: "Xavier Taylor" To: Subject: Hey bro, check out the huge sale these guys are offering Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:52:04 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60261.0D02AC00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60261.0D02AC00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing- no more ripoffs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere! A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results. Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind! As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself! Here's the link to check out! http://www.oklasc.com/pt/?46&wkugp ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60261.0D02AC00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing - no more tip-offs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere!

A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results.

Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind!

As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself!

Here's the link to check out!

Name	Patches	Regular	Now
Steel Package	10 Patches	$79.95	$49.95	Free shipping
Silver Package	25 Patches	$129.95	$99.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Gold Package	40 Patches	$189.95	$149.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Platinum Package	65 Patches	$259.95	$199.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60261.0D02AC00-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Fri Dec 16 14:46:58 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnLXd-0005Fg-Mt for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:46:58 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA05910 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:45:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnLVt-0004aa-1A; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:45:09 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnLVn-0004YE-S5 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:45:06 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA05628 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:44:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from b.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.81.52] helo=smtp.aaisp.net.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnLXS-0004KV-KZ for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:46:47 -0500 Received: from 247.254.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.254.247] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtp.aaisp.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1EnLVQ-0007P2-6W; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:44:40 +0000 Message-ID: <43A3199B.8090903@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:46:35 +0000 From: Elwyn Davies User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nuno Garcia References: <0248B0F35AF7B8418CA72E88AC00BF1F8F2775@lisi053a.siemens.pt> In-Reply-To: <0248B0F35AF7B8418CA72E88AC00BF1F8F2775@lisi053a.siemens.pt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: dbb8771284c7a36189745aa720dc20ab Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ietf.org id OAA05628 Cc: Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com, ipv6@ietf.org, sasson_shuki@emc.com Subject: Re: Fragmented IPv6 packets X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi. Related matters have been discussed in connection with potential=20 security problems mainly on the v6ops list. Some thoughts below... Regards, Elwyn Davies Nuno Garcia wrote: >Hi there: > >I believe the issue is not about fragmentation. > =20 > As RFC2460 stands at the moment, there is no constraint on how a packet=20 that needs to be fragmented should be split up. Clearly the last=20 fragment is generally going to be smaller than the path or link MTU (the=20 full packet is very unlikely to divide up evenly into MTU sized=20 pieces). This is not a problem because there is no minimum size=20 specified for an IPv6 payload (indeed you can send an IPv6 packet with=20 *no* payload). Currently, there is no requirement for the fragments before the last to=20 be any particular size and it is entirely up to the implementation how=20 an oversize packet should be broken up into fragments. This means that=20 at present an implementation has to accept fragments, however small. As was discovered with IPv4, allowing a packet to be divided into very=20 small fragments can be a security problem. Two hazards are that (1)=20 with large numbers of fragments the reconstruction buffers may be=20 overflowed and (2) the first fragment may not contain the information=20 needed by middleboxes that are looking at transport port numbers for=20 traffic classification. [A related problem, which has nothing to do with=20 size of packets, is that RFC2460 does not forbid overlapping fragments. =20 This can be a major security hazard but in practice many implementations=20 will reject overlapping fragments.] In my opinion, it would be desirable to at least recommend that all=20 fragments before the last are (say) 1024 octets or longer in length. =20 This would mean that even with a couple of tunnel headers added the=20 packet would not exceed the smallest possible MTU and so it would not be=20 necessary to mandate Path MTU discovery for fragmented packets. Of=20 course an implementation which does path MTU discovery on a path could=20 send larger fragments if it knows the MTU is larger than 1280 octets. =20 If this was recommended, receivers would be allowed to drop small=20 fragments and avoid the security problems. I have not researched what=20 the fragmentation policies are used by the various implementations=20 (which I ought to do) - this constrains to some extent what can be done=20 for backwards compatibility. >The minimum Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) of 1280 stated in RFC 2460 d= oes not stops IPv6 packets to be smaller that 1280 octets - what it does = say is that any link that is supposed to convey IPv6 packets must accept = packets that are at least as big as 1280 octets - what the RFC says is th= at if an IPv6 node has a path MTU smaller that 1280 octets, then the IPv6= packets must be fragmented/reassembled at a layer bellow IPv6.=20 > >Actually, is kind of dumb to have a protocol that defines packets to be = as big as 64K and then mostly uses only 1500 bytes, but that another stor= y, and btw, this was already true for IPv4... Ethernet issue I suppose... > =20 > Indeed: Some higher speed versions of Ethernet can use larger frame=20 sizes, but Ethernet doesn't handle fragmentation so it is up to IP (v4=20 and v6) to fit its packets to the Ethenet frame size. In fact if you=20 look at IPv6 the default behaviour is closely fitted to using an=20 Ethernet L2 (things like the MTU and the use of link local multicast for=20 configuration). Other types of L2 just have to conform (or be adapted). >So, if a given payload is to conveyed over a network whose path MTU is 1= 280 (but it can be bigger, as far as I know, there is no upper limit) the= sender fragments the payload and encapsulates it in IPv6 packets whose s= ize is 1280 octets. This does not mean that the last (or any) packet cann= ot be 100 octets long, it only says that an IPv6 node, after running Path= MTU Discovery (RFC1981), must fragment its payloads as to make the IPv6 = packets as big as the discovered MTU. > =20 > As mentioned above, actually '.. make the IPv6 packets no larger than=20 the discovered MTU'. >So here are my 2 cents, hope it helps, and I take this occasion to wish = you all a very Happy Season, and a wonderful 2006. > >Greetings! > >Nuno Garcia >PhD Student=20 >SIEMENS S.A. >INFORMATION and COMMUNICATIONS * RESEARCH and DEVELOPMENT 1 * RESEARCH=20 > >Rua Irm=E3os Siemens, 1 >Ed. 1, Piso 0 >Alfragide >2720-093 Amadora >Portugal=20 > >Phone: +351-21 416 7159 >Fax: +351-21 424 2082=20 >e-mail: Nuno.MGarcia@siemens.com=20 > >-----Original Message----- >From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = sasson_shuki@emc.com >Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de Dezembro de 2005 19:20 >To: Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com; ipv6@ietf.org >Subject: RE: Fragmented IPv6 packets > >The mandate is on the fragmentation is on the transmitting side (the one= that applies the fragmentation). The receiving side may reassemble these= packets. From at least one implementation (Open BSD) there is no such ch= eck. >Also the TAHI test doesn't test for this case. >All of the above and the common sense says that the receiver should asse= mble these packets. > >Hope this helps! >Shuki > >-----Original Message----- >From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of = Muthukumar_Lakshmanan@McAfee.com >Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 1:42 AM >To: ipv6@ietf.org >Subject: Fragmented IPv6 packets > > >I have a question on IPv6 fragments. Since IPv6 mandates a minimum MTU = of 1280, IPv6 fragments (except the last fragment) should be of minimum = 1280 bytes right? When an end host receives an IPv6 fragment which is les= ser than 1280 bytes ( except the last fragment ) , should it treat it as = invalid and drop it or should it still consider the fragment for reassemb= ly. Are there any IPv6 implementations which reassemble them? > >Thanks, >Muthu > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > =20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From 5np@web6.ehost-services.com Fri Dec 16 20:54:09 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnRGx-0005Vp-RF for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:54:09 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA15956 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:53:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from [72.11.211.163] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnRIf-0001HP-NU for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:55:54 -0500 Received: from [205.248.102.79] (port=25 helo=mailc.microsoft.com) by mailc.microsoft.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:04:34 -0500 Received: from [32.97.182.141] (port=25 helo=e1.ny.us.ibm.com) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com with smtp for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:04:34 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c602d6$88eb0b80$0100007f@localhost> From: "Aaron Watson" <5np@web6.ehost-services.com> To: Subject: Your partner will worship you for it Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:04:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C602D6.88EB0B80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: c0bedb65cce30976f0bf60a0a39edea4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C602D6.88EB0B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing- no more ripoffs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere! A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results. Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind! As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself! Here's the link to check out! http://www.leropard.net/pt/?46&feocj ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C602D6.88EB0B80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Finally the real thing - no more tip-offs! Enhancment Patches are hot right now, VERY hot! Unfortunately, most are cheap imitiations and do very little to increase your size and stamina. Well this is the real thing, not an imitation! One of the very originals, the absolutely strongest Patch available, anywhere!

A top team of British scientists and medical doctors have worked to develop the state-of-the-art Pen1s Enlargment Patch delivery system which automatically increases pen1s size up to 3-4 full inches. The patches are the easiest and most effective way to increase your size. You won't have to take pills, get under the knife to perform expensive and very painful surgery, use any pumps or other devices. No one will ever find out that you are using our product. Just apply one patch on your body and wear it for 3 days and you will start noticing dramatic results.

Millions of men are taking advantage of this revolutionary new product - Don't be left behind!

As an added incentive, they are offering huge discount specials right now, check out the site to see for yourself!

Here's the link to check out!

Name	Patches	Regular	Now
Steel Package	10 Patches	$79.95	$49.95	Free shipping
Silver Package	25 Patches	$129.95	$99.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Gold Package	40 Patches	$189.95	$149.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included
Platinum Package	65 Patches	$259.95	$199.95	Free shipping and exercise manual included

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C602D6.88EB0B80-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sat Dec 17 04:57:07 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnYoN-0002G7-3K for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:57:07 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03398 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:56:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnYmu-00026H-Ho; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:55:36 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EnYms-00025H-C3 for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:55:34 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA03325 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:54:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr ([192.44.77.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EnYoc-0007ma-VF for ipv6@ietf.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 04:57:25 -0500 Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [193.52.74.194]) by laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/2003.04.01) with ESMTP id jBH9sqY06213 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:54:52 +0100 Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (localhost.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) by givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBH9spHJ038447 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:54:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr) Message-Id: <200512170954.jBH9spHJ038447@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> From: Francis Dupont To: ipv6@ietf.org Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:54:51 +0100 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) at enst-bretagne.fr X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f Subject: two questions about SEND X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org I have two questions about SEND: - is an "open source" or not implementation available? - in the RFC 3971 section 6.4.3 Trust Anchor Option page 35, an anchor name of type FQDN is "stored as a string, in the DNS wire format, as specified in RFC 1034" but obviously ^^^^ this name is a dNSName for SubjectAltName, i.e., the example trustanchor.example.com is encoded into 't' 'r' 'u' ... 'e' '.' 'c' 'o' 'm' and not 11 't' 'r' 'u' ... 'e' 3 'c' 'o' 'm' 0 which is the real format used on the wire but is useful only when names are directly given to DNS internal routines. BTW this wire format should be referenced by section 3.1 of RFC 1035 (not 1034), so I think the word "wire" is a typo, isn't it? Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sun Dec 18 00:02:29 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Enqgn-0005TV-RI for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:02:29 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA18899 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:01:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Enqez-00056B-U8; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:37 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Enqex-00055v-Tf for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:35 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA18676 for ; Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:59:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net ([66.92.66.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Enqgt-0006tX-Jz for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:02:37 -0500 Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66235A59 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:09 -0500 (EST) To: ipv6@ietf.org From: Rob Austein Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:00:09 -0500 Message-Id: <20051218050009.66235A59@cyteen.hactrn.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f Subject: Weekly posting summary for ipv6@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 33.33% | 4 | 26.04% | 16183 | dr@cluenet.de 8.33% | 1 | 16.03% | 9962 | elwynd@dial.pipex.com 8.33% | 1 | 10.77% | 6693 | nuno.mgarcia@siemens.com 8.33% | 1 | 10.08% | 6264 | suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com 8.33% | 1 | 9.43% | 5863 | jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp 8.33% | 1 | 7.72% | 4799 | sasson_shuki@emc.com 8.33% | 1 | 6.91% | 4292 | brc@zurich.ibm.com 8.33% | 1 | 6.62% | 4115 | sra+ipng@hactrn.net 8.33% | 1 | 6.40% | 3978 | francis.dupont@enst-bretagne.fr --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 12 |100.00% | 62149 | Total Grunchweather Associates provides this automatic summary on an at-whim basis at the request of the IPv6 WG chairs. Your mileage may vary. We decline responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors. If this script produces broken output, you get to keep both pieces. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sun Dec 18 16:52:36 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eo6SK-0001y1-R4 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:52:36 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA27342 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:51:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eo6Or-0001Eh-Te; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:49:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eo6Op-0001EQ-JT for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:48:59 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26896 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:47:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo6Qr-0006pV-FM for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:51:06 -0500 Received: from iconsrv6.india.hp.com (iconsrv6.india.hp.com [15.42.227.74]) by palrel10.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A669235DFF for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mn000777.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.123.196.180]) by iconsrv6.india.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_29774)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id DAA16318 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:12:53 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <43A5D92D.1030507@india.hp.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:48:29 -0800 From: Arun Thulasi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ipv6@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IPv6 Multicast filtering rules (version 01): comments sought X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: arunt@india.hp.com List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello All, The next version (version 01) of IPv6 multicast filtering rules draft has been posted and it is available from http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arunt-ipv6-multicast-filtering-rules-01.txt. It addresses the issues and comments that were offered when version 0 was posted on this working group. The new version adds behavioral description in a SSM environment and also makes a few corrections in the terminologies as was suggested in earlier reviews. Do offer your comments, questions and suggestions on the new version of this draft. Thanks, Arun T -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From cathy.bayly@csfb.com Sun Dec 18 19:37:52 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eo92G-0007GI-F9; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:37:52 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA13338; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:36:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eo94M-00040X-S5; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:40:03 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-243-121-100.stx.res.rr.com ([24.243.121.100]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Eo929-0005ox-Rl; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:37:46 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.0] ([24.243.121.100]) by hotmail.com (Sendmail 8.7.1) with ESMTP (SSL) id IYT48770 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:37:29 -0600 Message-ID: <760g869k.2946497@hotmail.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=checkbook; d=hotmail.com; b=vSSBrzu1l86PnfsdfM4Oc3pgp1ScPzsTzhL6RDLMJTMVZbNjzNDkjnn2U8asRj4Eu361zf5EFXsSMUf9; X-Display: Full X-List: norwegian.usenet Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:37:29 -0600 From: "Rico Singh" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: imss-admin@ietf.org Cc: imss-archive@ietf.org, imss-bounces@ietf.org, imss-web-archive@ietf.org, in@ietf.org, ing@ietf.org, ing-admin@ietf.org, internet-drafts@ietf.org, internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org, ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org, iporpr-admin@ietf.org, iporpr-web-archive@ietf.org, ipoverib@ietf.org Subject: Last chance for lower rates Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------AttPart_90967505==.OLA" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Scan-Signature: ee80a2074afbfe28d15369f4e74e579d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AttPart_90967505==.OLA Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

on buzzer try newsboy but drudgery some ecuador on c's may grebe , mcneil not emperor ! concur see questionnaire not divert but cobb try chunk on filch Or maybe not

--------------AttPart_90967505==.OLA Content-Type: image/gif; name="bilge.5.gif" Content-ID: <3.0.0.28.0.05401829420920.82880432@botanic.msn.com.9> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="bilge.5.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhtgHYAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZzJmZmZlmzGZm zGZmZmYzzDMzMzMAzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAAC2AdgAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8Tq/b7/gf5ECCLFQLEAB+eYWG h1V7fX8pgYOMiJGSk0OKI4SNgpiUnJ2eM5YimAcQEhKWjpiBpqGfrq+cpaazfwcSDiILEnyp f7qMDruww8SGrYQQuCOOvQASkAAOysXU1XDHf7KzpgC9tnzLgtbj5GjYjyfNzyTS5e7vYOe/ IqS+mr7r0cLo8P3+UucAkKKV616uWZZs/VvIkI0DaA0jSpxIsaLFixgzatzIsaPHjyBDihxJ suQ4XSRu/41o52ITvXwuFkzz4TKGo0Ezy9wkoevAzioscdQUsu+GA3Epiu74CWSfLqRDU9S0 BXGFzCBRY4pLloZpt11epQS9kfWH0hpHV5zNEbYHJmn71kqtKuMqkLIs2upEakLvk7E28PaQ axYcD786WO4ihJKerFYCEdoKFgycLlaGL5sCLCIYZnqeYT6bhcsWq4Okp4VWpK1eNwiPDa92 +ZPQgdCMFK7M+TX1t5eQwML+rPDmQFN0j99CuupUWoGPk2urHG048hG3CUZm58D0Ke4p+RxX xdfPZJUjnMaONg32bp6CAq3XrCy0skDB8H3Wt661EJSkdIPLc5MdZNgltVwnzP881R3ESCm8 wQbOcxJCp8x1rvHDIISiWPLcTYydwos4R4l33SIvdSgeV7p1ltOGKr2FHjMiNljcVuJkiN2M 33314HcF+lgCKTmawkcwOXI1iCKklCYBePzsGE5k961T2wKmQbRgPpW1aKQIML32lSI77VOi hb3xwqUg3wQo5hDftKOQkkoWZIJt+QgT5kPOHFinnSY89xIfMLGEiVJctQWiPeB809OOEN3U jqCRHdAieyUgistNo4nC6KA3NiglilM6A417fza2El+/URonq7tcamhVmCAzE0pXUmWCntC0 w5g0+JTATEJxqemnT3H1+keYiOnwjCV+5KPNNncmCE7/rNtI9iRPOXGGKYpFzbodt9/2tZU9 O/rEV5TpWSoMYOZt6yIJlwoIJpb36PYTtmKGts2x9LIpr50u/baSlkfmtAu8WA4srrDxnUuv cIsYHJ7FYvbiCJ/wvVkpmGpm+4xxIgNZocdCHCWvygiygOe1hB6Y3qndrtsZrDG/x4+moprr qceODqxrCcCSiLPFNfHMHp8ysbSvu/3yVgJt4iCqya0D9/yxqwsfXVStdPlRK9ZfXbwWr1B2 aupZw6YLctk+v41CY82yhd6Yy+SjY8sGv4vKlj/mROSEODp2oWzKyBg4dB6KsyjQwlSYpQmm GeYemksaSLS06FUOpnpmixkk/5HC8mg0OKUIXCVEthT5bo9Ndmi47F+hTtcqO65OpewYv80g dfrU12PHO/WNuodP7nRm7TQCCmeYd0On3dTWyq3ZJprdwlt2+ykXHOI/o7aZMtzX+CZjSBk8 W9isagPJeLdvE9TlmTvfZ6jSb3aCcoJezxL8+5uO39yHHQI6hhWQyEr0AHjAGvWuT+ILBYOG Rrz0FWslkkHZ9X6Uj7qZhAVhahke/pSFB37QHaOjX8fmQD/gbcFbJ0ThdGQWvjmshoZYIEwM d8jDHvrwh0AMohCHSMQixkEwT0BiXwqlw5bYDCtPhIIKYzDFFlRxIFE0wqOKsMUZdBELSmxC GDNVJP+pUTGLNEGjGNWogiq6zGZPocsRvvifJlrFjlKUI0D0CIj+4PGNR3CjFNkoFUJODY5/ rCMOf0BHGDTSWZqxlCwg0Rwm3eKSp3kNKwgkQMs8hpPT200pJEkabGXyeou8xCXfd0MwTYOO qZtFZrZRCiGJYlsbPIF19IfB/eRPNNqADH+Q0sr6eY8n8ouMLH85E39N8XqdyaA+Ujek6QAH g2PiRt4mlMEtMmgex7xljELZOiMppxTZIAj/cHCdp6jJQdF0l7QYASM2Xc5z9aTd3qbJuJfs QxVrWoFpyuMcWRDqlWf5pDYvAxdtwk4lDPUMrcbHoWk21ETaq2hqhveS4fz/AUkXzZxppFFR z5BUJSrrziAK2iOQemZdA+GTSSU6zAMNVGUCg0QwekOb12kPOUGipj7kedJNnWKUq1DpjoCa OpVZCUJ8aKpQa3A30RCqV92ByaFOJQiuXbUPXYUV0Yw2Mdvdix18HCoGEYqLu8GSR4QiFi79 SKh9kG5qWgXL8AqETlXWFRhZa103kGVBXKAqr+7iC5ZoR5m8LeApeUOkmizYVY7eMoHPoOBO 3Vk6wu5IE0/yTlxXillkDUhzE3sdZun5OoSmVS2GsSrGAoG0BEEsGgir18ZKdiCWcKxdP/MO Le8om6x9x60JZU5mmSUvEalEuP86JDIfWzLQimxZ/6rJ2kohWt3MTYsWDLoTiUr2EKstUU29 etJOxTuxhuk0eWvpSXj14aNfjMyP1z0Oa2U2tPXOTHP+Io0NikLgr+6mtnKTnVcheImumlFn C95ZKucWrqIUaHgupF1kGjaTWkZzlJFJhjRGLN5ZUlfEI07niEd8UGya674oBpZ3tbdiZMnx cpRZ8UPCe1dkorcP6tXuSqcbpCE3Ur5h8vBRNTGcW+pYqZcx1pC4ZOEOtlbHr1VBgYH7O2xZ DhjQAtJD/YY6MZNviv8bs1mrY5kt4bCLnB1IOhOkXfrpqqKyWGp7rByhGl0mxID9aOcudzf/ GugXrQt05hrbz5HCs35xBv8xhqa6TWXWgkOGxiCZvvQlyB7ZlJdGD00ZGs0zh1WtdBxanE/0 qEgnEgVbtl4GERzB/3Wy1mcWMNGmwb9/UhIh+02HUrLXuWzRyoKhzhY7LPzdiWarzbQsczKd kd3SLZPYrNlKtsh3XQ0H2JLZkqw/ERJNFDRbfJ2OrzCga8F1f0mcAvYXaiHVy20Emz/SzAIJ XfbgJdyGcizetVKFxcrMpHgmPukLidPRNM6kWFgB7wwltyeN3so4FxOvuMBvBY3baJw7wKrK bSz+W7ukY+HYQfnIAQ5yiJQ8UhEXEK+lNnCBHLxRCI85FVpoR55P2IhAt2G+VVDMoBv96EhP utL/l870pjudi69+utTb8MipW/3qWGe6QqgSSpTZxoDMjBySSJ31sgNh61/q3Si2dc+vuy6q KunPz81O9xig/cu3xRTXtPYbOhmy7oBvAdpJZbYj8fa3bxtFXwPPeBoMXoTckRTNccYuCjb+ 8oIP7cCG4rndNVrN6CCFu7JROGpj/vTbuVRUVLjOBl4yqoBFz+UI3W/U2556t889FTyo+95X Isu+D77wh0/84hv/+MgXAwxJYsKQ/GT5SIiKm24QdRyMh4bKPVFNKSeLV04yb+YLWAgZeTW5 6evvXtQ1T3LT/XBoP481ZAf6k8CxeolROjmoPllGXBO6bZr0UWUzJuMk//iAD4YnM6oyBKlw OCmCMj1gX15xKPZEgLYEf+yyKiUUOcBHBNI3f7A2dzzwDJxhGjVUIgQGDcWzMN5nKpfwIh5I A0xhV7j0glrxQPkBOR5XKhYYFZRiBYHwE5W0Zh+zOb5kHw04L4pHGjZTPt7UTepXb9xGKkb4 Gje4KvuWDEJWNFAyLzOzCd9QFECoTtHhIiBWQKVkeCGkMRuFHMaxHtynhLcEGeeBgLDxUTPx LO/DNvIjOKMhIpcRClO4NvrjHVfzGBioBWVoS9ThhclFODezIgIDHnhSJTZzOVGmiEixFmdy V2v3iGhyiZvTChWnXY7CF2PxJ9GShwmYgG8SJP/zgCTV9HZtsi7NwGDn53mpZjoZs4QVNSi2 sggwMVucw4eRUyE4xiSEtg4ZUis9oiQ96IN8sSeGlYcHEhZfFC+SmA0ouC6U8ih7wgh66Ce2 hQ7XiCyLlFKgUmfoojOi0GE8pjYHkXepol42s2DjJyaH0igziBMrBHkZo0Ot4yHTyI8IEoxK oTT0NoTFgSjLolOJ8yDMQVZakILVaBCDsoX96CKyMpAFsy4kZErhlmD28y3Y2BvGphejCHvj IkLP10x3+IPpAoa0KDHp4nAIwzh0KGENmAolMzU25TjhV1Zp8ThjgYduc4S5wIejsh1M0Q7h 8pA1pBvPWAX7glXlwor/U3mNDYN3v6iDN+NjDLYrCMiQBQFQ6ZBFviIT3RYlFsMsFpSDdqJV LtiOyFQuh3iR8dgx+biTFjkXGTmVpQhdp0CRQRGDfqKUR7iQ4hiWD8OIXxCGgPVjsRMwjeOJ nAiUKumKlqWZZIZamoiMBAVW3OSA0NE0PWEYLVITxpiJoxU7uqIrrcY2ZQRPI6hmzaOX4KiP djJB/aeLMsWNWdUki+kME7hhxrlsizMxSymVoJlgjZmHGoYFTIFK4Bc9KZdvgchASbgZvHiG EfQ9JxCISUmEfraERdeA3zVe5tOGvKRJMPGHNFQ8Y2iXZrgZkfN++JibfOl60gGHWCQzTmWd //xwHN6Hn+gGGC2SoCujfk8ZPo5ZPxthf2JRezAgTO/QfMknbOxHoUwAfSKBoRn6Yu0ZoiRa oiZ6oiiaoiq6oiw6AgRQADBKAAEgAwJQAERAAAQAADUqACJQAAPQRk9IRRtIEwhkAgEAo0hK ADxKBD7aoz/qA03qpOwEgjswRmeHTlMJA9MnBDg6AC+aozFQozeaozX6pFFqbgkypIRHf5tm pAVAAAPgpTD6pEIQpWfKA2d6pzSgf4Ghpj7QGFn6AlsaBDgqAoUapjY6BIUaAAMwowCgp7h3 gS9gpSHIWm66pAAQAC+KqUCgpFIKpXQKqTLApzVAqX9KgwFUBIVao/9gmqkvGqMF4Kg1mqSJ WgKamqQzyqow6qpIyqkDgKRvmqNHKgCzuqtoWjvVqT0bph1fl1WUwYhRVXTrZDHKczIkMKzX GqW3Oqck8KsxKqvfCgBfGq46GgDFWqsicKSvWgDE2qsjcK4vqqPAeq7puq5L+qtf+oHRxEvz Q0wuCWLrQ4gRxE3jxz+q81xuWJ2PtQdvUSW+ZLBTphnvM58usK7smq5zKqexKq8+6q3oirFv Gqcwaq4xKgBH2rEv+qT4KrJvmqnsyqghKxXk9mgc4jl9t7AYpY1us3jgNGgDMg3u9mDYSgKL GqNyCqYr660zOqct+6pwaqzpurK2iqQe+7T/GzurLGujMAunW/ujJxunKQsA3iqj+rqJ7uEl ybJsOLIi8/RoaTGLU0aJloaLsmknpei2s4k3qWUiJqI7FQun3sqjL+qot7q0ZOuyHyuuF5uu PMqqM7qpLhqrrPquLTu0oipChHaYQ4gOsIFsUSl2eik1t4isnDG0LpqjkGuo7Dq5GPujb2qu jxulNeqoIwCpJ5urLSuvPPq6IFu7ofqkqau4W6tl5ogiv8I0WfMhQgM2Z3UwLFgtHTM0qTKT gLIK16Is7MIUCDaPL3CoR/qjcJqtAWC68moCh1oCs6u6wAqj7Uq74iqsi3u5NbRcELeSnGtn vrazNvUkWYEM7xWU/xjLqY+Kuq3qsu26vi07q2B6vulLAra7uEM7rOQrpp/6qMCLwOz6q7DV lJtyDxvjcvfhkQ9CZyE5OD4ZMEP4XdpUKjuhJIL5HR05ZcbbcYl0vk1bwLP7vUSbuPFqAg2c snEaxCSLqZoKv0sqv1GyDjyjetpIMhOCUHQ5JftWEBKKAhPcpD0sAjvKqkEcp0t6q+Dbqg3s u5cawAGsw5FLxp8KxF0MsxtMlmtzL2fhNMs7wiJZOpFqt/kLCI5DIkehn3dyKzC1edlANn+r uj+Kr7i7sWGruImryLwqr476q09axD16sbdqxBWcUD8STYvDxOQoMG12aYlDZQlyZkBbE/+Z NgKmq7Riy7uzOr5veq8vW8sETLnua8FlbMBm3Mivqsa6/MqVXKga7I8QZLbEJGqWVS6Ss3hv 8TfqAjd5I7cGw5uR0sf20irQTLeDjCKauYEWe7gWO7K8ur4nMM5kurHqS7UgC6yaHMwRmG/Z IyeErCF7AIbqh4VF6nrNpF2r3M7ASrvjvKTn+rony77vi8sl8MBfDMGYPM61mqd0Os6JXKv2 ZyZPOEHjNxbrU0O5tF0iNx2iXJ/jdxO0FZEhM5gk3YOgnD9WKgBdjL5BDNO0C9NeTKe2KsRR 67423agl0MXEmqk+LbZLaqH3JwMeagJdPAACrKNBrNRe3K1MrcX/RDzUIzDVOU24Q82oNT3T dIrVRE0CPS2rdIp4LZoGlAqiZ416lMp7a/3WcB3Xcj3XdF3Xdj0FLeynLRB1qanXd30ReV0Y WiovpvrXgA0Vfg1bg23Mhu0PfRgr33eghiVLM0ud56Ea7eGvgng3EIsbktrY8NBOfjZXyRnY mDi3S/luSqyMrC23K1nYoO0KVQWeSmPa32h5P2OacFMoA1kqfR3bC3GC7aJbIcw31fVAGtNV gIyPP3mEsA3cnRBrEFTbiH3Hm5sSjTEaMCPF24iU0P0P0q1aTuY8z9xm7oJDjAaLCUYjru0l HPrdsBDe0DY+5P1rRWpCGg2egAKxKymg//D93wAe4AI+4ARe4AZ+4Aie4Aq+4Aze4A7+4BAe 4RI+4RRe4RZ+4Rie4Rq+4Rze4R7+4SAe4iI+4iRe4sT3ABGQ4iluACKQACie4g+QACrg4ioe 4yNgACqu4gmQ4xHwACkQASyOAgzA4wAw5DUe5EZe4wDw4jpeAgzAACXwAD4+AjSe4g0Q5EKe 4wyA5QBgAA1Q4zI+AjZOAhEA5QDw5T2O5BFA5lCO42EOADue41MuAjhOAjhO5GV+42je42++ 5H0OAHl+AlWe5jceAW++41g+6GN+5zm+5Dz+5y3O5GO+5HPe5YZO5ZL+5lLe4iluAg9g5iKw 6Y6e4wnA6FZO5/88DuR2ruqF/uZeDuZUHgEIMAKdLgJDzuK3zgIJwAAo/uS4DuO8nuKgXgJx /uloPuU4/ulPvuVP3uMMAOmcXulOXubLXuTUbuS/vuzPTunazuXW3ueiPupP/uLQzujjvuKc 7uxGPucozuV5vuMPgOa2vua03uaXTufN/ungfu+2PuTKDuhmXuzN3uNizuoiEOhRLuzBfu9u Hutq7uwvbub5/uTcvuzebu3OjuZmHu6WHubrzgAaH+o+7u8n8OkkIOpS3u3Jfu72ruy+vuoP gOUND+fAvu6obuYIgO6OPu8Xn+WxHvM3juKQDu8y3+sdbwIzjwIv3vPWPu0O3/RRLu3/087v ok7ysW7wBT/s8G7p/O7oDRDqOg/wNM/iBuDx9H7w9v7nSY/qtX7yc57nd77vXz/qWI7wI2D1 bE/2/I7oNA/0dC70Ys7uUk8CRB/0qs7xDV/4f3/4Uk7wJT/sKC/tSU/wa18Cdz7nDR/3Jx8B c+/4Rh7mnM/zLjDkBe/td+7pWG/rqA7plU/4ZW73JED6sX/27Q71bq8CSR7km57sJrDjcx/r w97ivw7ptf/ifv/ujn/3Zy/2lV/5Qz7kfx7ueQ79qM/ixh/ksA/oUo/jX5/0fF/7q077gq8C YU/nYY74l17+XX7+KQ7toQ75U87xR0/z3d/1lq/kR0/9Cc/i/18OAgAQNdEDIFEiMpEhwrHc wqQslm9s37ARAYOv36oHeESOrl4rmGwGTwAo8IR0FmGt3/JxSmV3Uu3SiOwlVMdHWhphsIC6 abIGJ8rwPtNoLPLaKaGpebWJvOWp3QDqAaS98Mjk/I1dBYX9NBhRxhBlbippblpG/TmpcDkN nZaJEJXcEdbJpK2kIbw+RSDEzYHSuSLebMkIxwn9PDAsM6yGxYAB/MANvzHTIbGRMTOseHH7 Aqc8GADW9gDGEJv5wUQDtpwYpynSBDYGhxHfxqSPwPmDRuhEvH+JnnFq9GgakzL+vjHzxXCU H0/G0AGhhk4Zs3QQlxlIllFHMnCdZP8lwBPQnZppNMCc6fWLTI12pm4AiZFgGZKQik4iNHWq 4QwXfGjKWFlURBtGF4O1O2emFRle6WBd5BJnR6xn+Fj58YeoZzWrUrBqDKaxZzJpPx/1wQjj oU0xoALiOcoOSdAjaT22I9IiC76DpgYrCUeHV590JPSum2kPQIlnhoqmdXuisNugJZdVrrY0 jcbJc+sipXNUjqSfUCUqc6Q3WJ2HGf0yXbKOYWGFJDq2Egvn8p7alW4nLZOMr1tRdF6E1qmX LqjoMODiVWM99wsvXBgn/StlpUrlrg27BWJrdvq56nEgd5QZ1GQu5KSVoOpemyPmnDkn1s8s qW1F2S4F9oP/GoJKSJGCMOWwFwd/CSBBTTY6NMGYPxDCoR6EL7QRkn/nNTLbJ5wcYqEJGAKh 4Rgc3uAgNU04995l9g2R3xzUbcJFAzmylt0KPgLZxWashZcginsMeRSA+RRXxIXHgNeEDvSA R9ZMwPhAyopGQHhKEakI0dkNE113nmlcBkgFH14+s6Y/9DihoJsXeflTdrEEsVadtF1ipmxx OjSGMXlmsecgrGhEZithRuGLbVic6eV9SvSpB6RV6JCOg+HEdppQl+hBWnqqACVdoqyEMU5x AvZ1w05nRjSTAdzMwE0zLCh2q2K76pTZrK7suhM3tugazrA+WFbrL7jSuoxlXo0p/y0t1mph 0hQkzecrU1l00wkz0+YRq7FwbOesuCDJmsW57PZwK7ZMHeutD+Pq5C6w14WRQBHv7rqvvywk O4OyEuE7TL/9zrelww9DHLHEE1NcscUXY5wxxOFq3LHHH4McMpghkVyyySejnLLKK7Pcsssv wxyzzDPTXLPNN+Ocs84789yzzb8oELTQQxNdtNFHI5200ksz3bTTT0MdtdRTU1211VdjnbXW W0+tmMhfgx222GOTXbbZZ6Odttprs92222/DHbfcc9Ndt91345233nvz3bfffwMeuOCDE164 4YcjnrjiizPeuOOPQx655JNTXrnll2Oeueabc96555+DHv+66KOTXrrpp6Oeuuqrs96666/D Hrvss9Neu+2345677rvz3rvvvwMfvPDDE1885BBIkLwDEkOwwA0OJJ88BGc3b7z1k1d/gATO Q1y9DA4sLwIE05ft/fXnN+69+Q6vLwL4MCxAPtnto1+/4dUvIMEBMECvPP/JL0B70vte+AAA gfAdAHkAhMEB+rc9/Ykgf9F7H/iQtz8Hjs95Eiyg/Tr4NwVKQH4OgMD+Erg87R0ggeLjXgwc GEIYjE8ECeReDAEgwf3lj4YSWB70yDfCEiLPedsz4P48aES+qW96+Sui+PY3RBiykH8OiF8L 5QcA7QFghDFYIgAgCEMeki9/MZj/oQGteMQz4s1825Ng9BaYQBKu8HnLO+D/2pg8E8pAf1jc Ig/DR8UYZC+IaByk3dS4ADFuApH0ex8K3cdB/lmRi14UXx9lOEkyWjKKhNxk29QnAfHBMYuf pKIiNZlFP5JPewiMoSojeEdR6rCS7oNjAreXwBQO8Y+c3CXaQBhKUUqviAqkoSnf50gZgrCA tVSeF9m4Q1m6L3oZBGb46MfLa1pujx8zIza76bgcIvOR3hzn6uI3QXKiM53qXCc72+nOd8Iz nvLkZANF1jztmTJiiBzjEx2my3nO04Ihu2c/KQY9TR4UYv8EKDxVKc6MWXNiIzTjAh+2UIa6 E3zaNOAI/wdYxxB6j42hrB4EH+g/ZE6QmwecIvzit8oJQvCAII1eIyPITYxes5HmQx756JhF Wi4QnD+NY0mHSMZW2vCFMjigLklIxzdaMqY7tOkxRTBJnHbTmNqsoQ2VeMkhFpSlJHUiC9+3 vouCFYfT06IWGRjTAv5xjxfFKi/t+ETzkdKMBLXr9MbaRSaalYlX5OYQzarBtWoypixsqvMi SldC/vOPePUqP4UoWCj+NbPHPKsZG4nCTyZ1qG7d32ThR0LQPhabVzVgYxfbU6AWNpRc9Osk 35c/PyrVrTD0KRa1l3vrrhYGIcxnagd5USoGF5gg5Z5IiTjVLr5UeWbcJxevwFg8Ze5QsaZt IWqL+9iCBs6Y3p0nUqE5NAqOl7zJvCzg5prWkHp3vvKdL33ra9/74scj3t0vf/vr3/8COMAC zm8IAAA7 --------------AttPart_90967505==.OLA-- From 7kan-lee@accessmedia.com Sun Dec 18 20:37:39 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eo9y7-0000qf-HS for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:37:39 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA19668 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:36:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from cpe-66-24-11-29.stny.res.rr.com ([66.24.11.29] helo=66.24.11.29) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoA0D-0005oQ-2w for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:39:51 -0500 Message-ID: <46a301c6043c$9fdc7ca1$d771b20f@accessmedia.com> From: "Steven A. Norman" <7kan-lee@accessmedia.com> To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?Um9sZXggZm9yICQyNDkuOTU=?= Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:34:34 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_8D9B7207.CC5C50A8" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express V6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_8D9B7207.CC5C50A8 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_0001_9415A53C.8F5BA5AC" ------=_NextPart_001_0001_9415A53C.8F5BA5AC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit REPLICA WATCH MODELS - exact copies of V.I.P. watches - perfect as a gift for your colleagues and friends - free gift box Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega Cartier, Bvlgari, Franck Muller .. and 15 other most famous manufacturers. http://www.watches-for-people.com All watches are for only $239.95 - $279.95! ________________________________ To change your mail preferences, go here ________________________________ ------=_NextPart_001_0001_9415A53C.8F5BA5AC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

REPLICA WATCH MODELS

- exact copies of V.I.P. watches
- perfect as a gift for your colleagues and friends
- free gift box

Rolex, Patek Philippe, Omega
Cartier, Bvlgari, Franck Muller

.. and 15 other most famous manufacturers.

http://www.watches-for-people.com

All watches are for only $239.95 - $279.95!

________________________________
To change your mail preferences, go here
________________________________

------=_NextPart_001_0001_9415A53C.8F5BA5AC-- ------=_NextPart_000_0000_8D9B7207.CC5C50A8-- From Hqecu@optonline.com Sun Dec 18 22:05:10 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoBKo-0007VS-MN; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:05:10 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA28911; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:04:08 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512190304.WAA28911@ietf.org> Received: from [218.93.234.172] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoBMu-00008s-Ls; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:07:23 -0500 From: "Daren Richmond" To: pilc-admin@ietf.org Subject: Fw: Thanks Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:00:23 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_MNUQPOTN.CNHDSNLW" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_MNUQPOTN.CNHDSNLW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your present homeloan qualifies you to get generous revenues. Our database will match you with the most equipped financier, so that you will have more finances in your statement at the end of each month. Its really that simple.. Many many Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their dwellings every day. Now its your moment. This quick 1 minute form will be your next manouver towards total monetary security. Hoping on the best for you all. Daren Richmond Should you decide not to get hold of this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_MNUQPOTN.CNHDSNLW Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your present homeloan qualifies you to get generous revenues.

Our database will match you with the most equipped financier, so that you will have more finances in your statement at the end of each month.

Its really that simple..

Many many Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their dwellings every day.

Now its your moment.

This quick 1 minute form will be your next manouver towards total percuniary security.

Hoping on the best for you all.

Daren Richmond

Should you decide not to get hold of this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_MNUQPOTN.CNHDSNLW-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 19 01:59:58 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoF02-0007FD-4a for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:59:58 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25940 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:58:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoEyg-0006zV-FY; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:58:34 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoEye-0006zA-VR for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:58:33 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA25634 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:57:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoF0m-0007vU-Kj for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:00:47 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1010:ddd9:9605:37b6:5576]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1F91521A; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:58:02 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:58:01 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: Suresh Krishnan In-Reply-To: <43A0AF6C.1020907@ericsson.com> References: <43A0AF6C.1020907@ericsson.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: why 0xFFFE is used in the modified EUI-64 format X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:49:00 -0500, >>>>> Suresh Krishnan said: > I was confused by the same inconsistency couple of years ago and a > thread resulting from my question failed to clarify the choice. I guess > it is something we have to live with. You can look at this thread. > http://www.atm.tut.fi/list-archive/ipng/msg10039.html Thanks for the pointer. I now understand this was indeed discussed before. I agree we should live with the confusing choice as a "de-facto standard" rather than tweaking the specification once again. But...at the risk of causing unnecessary discussion, I wonder whether we can clarify this point in the RFC based on addr-arch-v4 just saying the method shown in appendix A actually is inconsistent with the IEEE standard but the IETF has decided to accept it. I personally think this can be done as a part of final editorial work with RFC editor before publication. What do others think? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 19 14:53:10 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoR4I-0004Z6-Pf for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:53:10 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA04036 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:52:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoR2u-0004CI-T9; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:51:44 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoR2r-0004Ae-KV for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:51:43 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA03867 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:50:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from jive.softhome.net ([66.54.152.27]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoR56-0002Hq-JA for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:54:01 -0500 Received: (qmail 8996 invoked by uid 417); 19 Dec 2005 19:51:27 -0000 Received: from shunt-smtp-out-0 (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.3.12) by shunt-smtp-out-0 with SMTP; 19 Dec 2005 19:51:27 -0000 Received: from mehr ([132.70.219.60]) (AUTH: LOGIN ericlklein@softhome.net) by softhome.net with esmtp; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:51:26 -0700 Message-ID: <012e01c604d5$37ed94e0$6b01a8c0@mtc.ki.se> From: "Eric Klein" To: ipv6@ietf.org Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:48:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0 Subject: Trying to track down the ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com mail archive X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1845315848==" Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1845315848== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_012B_01C604E5.F95ECF80" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_012B_01C604E5.F95ECF80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am trying to track down the original archive of = ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com that later became = http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/ipng and then finally became = http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/ in order to do some analysis = for my thesis. Can you tell me if this archive still exists anywhere, and if so how I = could access it. Thanks, Eric Klein, MSc ------=_NextPart_000_012B_01C604E5.F95ECF80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am trying to track down the original = archive of=20 ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com that=20 later became http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/ipng and then finally became http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/ in order to do some analysis for my thesis.

Can you tell me if this archive still = exists=20 anywhere, and if so how I could access it.

Thanks,

Eric Klein, = MSc

------=_NextPart_000_012B_01C604E5.F95ECF80-- --===============1845315848== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --===============1845315848==-- From Qxsude@optonline.com Mon Dec 19 21:11:29 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoWyP-0005XP-44; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:11:29 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA23054; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:10:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512200210.VAA23054@ietf.org> Received: from [218.64.32.185] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoX0g-000066-6d; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:13:54 -0500 From: "Colby Hunt" To: rddp-request@ietf.org Subject: Fw: ... Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:59:45 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_VTTKUZAL.MNJNTOVF" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_VTTKUZAL.MNJNTOVF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your existant homeloan meets the requirements for you to get sizable gains. Our system will synchronise you with the most expert company, so that you will have more funds in your balance at the end of each month. It really can be effortless.. Myriads of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their condos every day. Now its your moment. This simple 1 minute form will be your next move towards categorical fiscal security. With kind salutations, Colby Hunt Should you choose not to be given this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_VTTKUZAL.MNJNTOVF Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your existant homeloan meets the requirements for you to get sizable gains.

Our system will synchronise you with the most expert company, so that you will have more funds in your balance at the end of each month.

It really can be effortless..

Myriads of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their condos every day.

Now its your moment.

This simple 1 minute form will be your next move towards categorical percuniary security.

With kind salutations,

Colby Hunt

Should you choose not to be given this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_VTTKUZAL.MNJNTOVF-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Mon Dec 19 22:27:27 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoY9v-0005EF-QZ for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:27:27 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA00396 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:26:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoY6k-0004ej-28; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:24:10 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoY6h-0004eK-Ie for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:24:07 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA29954 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:23:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoY91-0002IF-Gh for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:26:32 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:200:0:8002:dced:b1df:5637:8594]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7601521A; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:24:01 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:24:01 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Eric Klein" In-Reply-To: <012e01c604d5$37ed94e0$6b01a8c0@mtc.ki.se> References: <012e01c604d5$37ed94e0$6b01a8c0@mtc.ki.se> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: Trying to track down the ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com mail archive X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org >>>>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:48:40 +0200, >>>>> "Eric Klein" said: > I am trying to track down the original archive of ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com that later became http://atm.tut.fi/list-archive/ipng and then finally became http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/ in order to do some analysis for my thesis. > Can you tell me if this archive still exists anywhere, and if so how I could access it. See ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/ipng-mail-archive/ JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From matthiasoltmann@espsim.com Mon Dec 19 23:05:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EoYkL-0005He-R7; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:05:05 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA04338; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:04:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EoYme-0003f2-7k; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:07:29 -0500 Received: from c-24-2-159-241.hsd1.ct.comcast.net ([24.2.159.241]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EoYkE-00005S-EB; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:04:58 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (24.2.159.241 [24.2.159.241]) by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id e16si09[7]qbe.2005.57.24.29.82.94; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:05:08 -0600 Message-ID: <279n377f.8772235@msn.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:05:08 -0600 From: "Mayra Leonard" X-PGP-Key: rRSmkQv5rYKIyDt7F5Bfn0Rq3Fonz5fll87fMDHJ67IxKoYwrdUK99JpNZXal1uy== X-Mime-Key: Base64 (83xutdjp5BKf3Pa8QkiG9ochKPlw) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Cc: ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org, iporpr-admin@ietf.org, iporpr-web-archive@ietf.org, ipoverib@ietf.org X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: apache set sender to matthiasoltmann@espsim.com using -f Subject: Ratess will skyrocket soon Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------JavaMail.964842796934" X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 6ba8aaf827dcb437101951262f69b3de This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------JavaMail.964842796934 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
the oceanic a referred not bogeymen see laredo ! boast ! extrapolate be funnel it's berlitz some feel it's deliquesce in befit or emphysema a ukrainian try shenanigan Or maybe not

--------------JavaMail.964842796934 Content-Type: image/gif; name="bittern.9.gif" Content-ID: <2.0.0.56.0.23523127678564.70800605@econometric.hotmail.com.4> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="bittern.9.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhTAJyAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZmZlm/2Zm/2Zm ZmYz/zMz/zMzMzMA/wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAABMAnIAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8Tq/b7/i8fs/v+/+AgYKDhIWG h4iJiouIAQKPjwEAjpKPJQKSAJCbIpuRKpgpAgMEBAOZnQKXl6gknq2uJp6hjq8yqiehl6Sm uCO1kJnAkLulA76yKgG8BLojs8gtjqAoAqW4w5+rJZTFvSTZuM6dvMfgs7CM6tUFpdeTBZID 8SPzme3upiL4pQUFAykKRBMRgMC/UQYBipjnil4ngSf4JZTlcIQ7fKoESCSQbkWAiiSagTPY jFQ7VBov/3LU1M/dL5IIT5r4OHBhu2Pz/pHYqPCFxhQ0TcwzSWBSvlLpdIKrWLBdzJUsSZba 58vaQaKZUubruK7rw5kOp8LzBdFE2UnzikYc+BHqQ7UafU20ieJs3BJzLxVoeONjz2dnAbx7 JlbTXotqqS51yxIkgLQn5iFr2jPwrcOR25lVSApVYbOBP3oWSTix4hFl27ZK+dWra1CYfzm8 +9nyacA1bX/GvU9h28S7USMLnDI2YL42NDrOaw+swp/HhYc0/WtgO8t3k0mvAT2iwWhKTQRH jVR2pubcwgMIXHa8ru6v4yNfOhr97Z0Dx1sOekKsWMkQ8WeWLwIKxpFt8ME3Q/9Kf2ll0V8k MGTYdPjJVlMu8ew23oDJGQdYQdRJ1h91O/Fingj6ZFahdAViKN+LgOWjimgvqbfeUQrZJmEJ 2HlYz2EaSaKPPkHW1cwomlloIEUNHcVVCtdUZIxaLX5oGCTfrTihC1MViRqERuYD5goKImYY LJDhRaJwIBJET5UPocJeRj7q5SSMXsUVDDytZLnTkcSsN1CZguolymE03WUPKQFJFY2E2UX3 kC0wTJVikNDReAKNxZkCi13GZcPben9ht8k9gFoCA6HZ2WgYYxsW6heftG5a0ZxbwkYpnuqU qemr1NlWaAk7ahknCoyiOECyNKW4log8+iMtdQnWWVr/eTwCVGSXbwp75pn6VQUSiP1YJK20 IUHITFneEiQjk+Kd68+mn8VaVlw0wvntfRB5eSiv8vnqkF+zbsdjfmvu562zJvXUz4WFYjtp ABTbl+vFm57KIal3abqhWD9pBOZZBYtH5T8UO3KWxaO2O4nGhqZ3CsWRLiXXmrcNFRbOtQ03 o8sYA7yOwJmAfGtujwqrG2M2oeSP046tWC91zl5M6Av8pXWyOAjeC6RlgUHbEC7JmunmmoUB TaaHZaMIV6k3B4SMQbN17bPUTD/GtdCvEX2l2cMe/MtQddU0mFGhJUmeCqkpVfNjFVVrg6Yf nXVWXpAn1p3EgaNIXJIlTxoj/ypNkQVxCwqG/rfITQO+sbmeqZemwcOCSGCaV/OdCNFtypaj vGrJ61RA8obEz/B4PTqmwbSRKGC18j7pYj2mfZZTP+rB17NQ/lzUk7+uW6XScMDHoJy0j0T9 Hz7q2RtNQa1cT/fId7t7fHjnSyu97oBQvClBMxFGylJGkAHuz4CwGAYK0uE/oLTCfw3kBuke iMAYRBCAv0ggzDIIDgpmbE8cDOBMOCFBA1oQgRcM4cvGMYknpXASIwShBDvIDRJm0IT8y6EO d8jDHvrwh0AMohCHSMQiGvGISEyiEpfIxCY68YlQTIICFBBFIx5AAQcgwRWzqAMIUHEJCoBA FU1wAP8IcLEECpCABL5YhAM0QI1sRGMcFdAACDTgjACgox3xWAI32jGOfvQiGiFgxxQIEgsQ WKMIGtCAERySB4mUgBsl0EgdlJGPeRQjFBh5AwloUgSJ5IEiwSiBMfZRkiegJBaNcABPRvKT I2glG9/oxURykZZvRKUJ0ljLUbaSkomsJACCSUsUjPIKifwiIUdwTEuuEYtvFCYOWonJNEZh mTZI4xe1Kco4IsGapoylLkvQTCLUcZhelCYofUlJR4qxlcL05AmwOUxUvpGL3OQmAOCZSm9m gZ7lnOY4e0DNXZYSCvSsQSgBIE8S6LEBc8TjFPv5UD4+FIurnKhDvxhIiKL/wJph3GMf6/jH kRLyjrHE6ElRsMWLpjSk+CTkI1lK0jtqdIodPeMVMylSEVwRpiJwaVC9qVGezjSodYRoQdHo yVUG9aRnnGIY1TmCkN5xpyZYZkKrCsegjhOkXx3oPo8pS4ZKs50JfWM/Y0lSfwaSiqts6UpX gFWfzpGKO70iIVf5zKRi0qFQrStbVXmALW6xqmzUY0+rmlQsijWPB0VqSffp1KBudJdTLORT 95jXkFY2pEdNATzvSYJE9vKTzdyqCNRIyVye0bR09KQ9IztWvKoRosE8QRpvG8Z2+pS3ufWq HevIztsWk4yyxW1Dd8vJekL0uLo17ivX6UlGdhWy/8HsbSWZW0nYmtarePRtdqFbz3SyFpOm FeQvldtd3iJXlaalLVdlitxk+hSPaj2nOIk6UEqWdQRq9S14TTBKWsZ2nAampSJ/2dqGivaY av0tXEtZRjWakaHGVeNf19vbhWoxvYVFJTZJC4AEa9iRTc3lY8FZ3g6vVphpPKOAUazKscJX tvt8JRfH6+AV7DaOb0ysb1MLS2ays5JB5ioq/4tOUF7Yq/7c7RmTjM6oLnjGpP0lPgP6SyE3 Mo3CJPFYi/xbWH63vKVFpZQBrEgws9nLTuZqFsXcSk1SGbKPZSgbbfnmevpznVNW40ctzEdb BnSsjdxqOVns5KV6Vc9afP9smwVcZ68Ks8s23vKfS4vaAh+UxQA98jwRLGjkcrGg8NSnPte5 yGOumamthjOJgxvjrB6Tz62OLD3p3GMVKFqdESZyKs2syRmXWJcLLas2C8ts1a46zstmdhnF GGRp85OfzHSrsdVa6xdbW8xs5mNDPfzbL5dzmd02awki3O2G+lfapN12nkf57CaT26Hnlm8J IilkKh56oYrm777NOFBrNtPR2W4yvqm4VW5ie7Wb5uqEselbUKOW2Ab15r1/e2pd7vaThLQ2 N+VdzYPKG9FjPqhq6ynxfesatVdlNrgNCUuEjzWLwiZwHJdp86WWdaG7Za3QDUr0oAtd0JE8 ujz/Ec5lsVKTxQxWeiC1SmZsqhbd+garOPm4VHnWOupHDzHX573NrJdy5ZAlOs3tW2lIu3zH RV60fENe8FIeXNL+9qciA3rl8EacmYn2oiS7bfGEu1Pt+D6Bz8d54tUqHY49XzGFnT7bYy/7 359k9KPjbOPH/zWrNZc7zndOZrfHmckDbjS99T1oE3Cb9ZxXfH+1zd8rRhb1G5Wqwjkd+8Nr /thplzBTtzxt4cu+9msNPgnUivbfRxgFy0SrK9Ob5kBHGvmAR71WpZnuhBsb0t/vOwkOve41 rhGe9Cw8xHkP6/LLvuNbdvD3jS9nouO+1tpEqx1hn359Px+buAcDilZk/wAnTZpFTqS3WkXG ax6GegFYb+3kgJMmURfGdNqmTqHEaMZ2aN3XdrgmfBBobuNHgLQlWzKmTqPUazO3frVFToHH UvmmeHEWclI1RU3VZ/XXamPXbwwFS+30fLs3flQEhJA1Z/LlcLPHAr9kZ9elfACVgKekcay3 eFmUagVGgMW2gJKngC5HY1nEXND3SbjnYQCFgn/HflwVZp6macnHeW6Wa3gUXID2W5LnS7iG a1qmgFumSRb4Xmo4YQvnU/aVSrq0hNTVcZ92XRX2hbT1hpa3fD2mTxVWdmpIdijGUXyGdn4m iKWGb4FXb6Z3Z8zEhw1VRu1VhUC3higHWX92Zf9PxktlFn+25XdP9XmD+EuJF3s553KY2ImR Bn8Kl2UCFk2WxmZbCFl/OF9GZotmZoed2H+9uE2hdXjlJ1szll7zZ3q7l0uRBG7dV16R9Fdg 5kpNCI6NZ2OE5GB9eEqvdFubx2bpSH45Ro70hU7Y+IqyFY9lV43dGIXlp4+QaI0rqI3YOEqa aI445npHV3qeJnV4dmZ4RofhiGL8Bo9yiIBeRY/4Ro5Jto6ayGgH6ISoBYW2Fo8bd3McJ2bY 9HHuaIzdeIzHJpAYuUil13sISYawREsVuU41uU8bJlXVpHsshUeFpUVAuU9kpFtCqXhVuJS5 92c12Ed9hEnU9FOVVZT/fXSUPqZ7WIluTmlNVqlFVKmVUklGZPlScTWUcoRTsfR5aOmTLOVZ aumT1qZTTplHd1VZQ6WXlFVUZGSXd7mXVXhqU9mCoqVFhXlfbSmWosWVn0eUcLmYdsWWWcmW G0aUZ+lTZcmUZjlRWBmZaImZbqlDNlcEHwl7hHCQf+BG4dSav6gEp8kIqumatBkIoxkEn/mX tbmbvNmbvvmbwBmcwjmcxFmcxnmcyJmcjSBDM7AMR+CcBaMqoBAofbE8TGAV3rIrR3AKBGGd OeCcFrEDfqkErGkFUjaQMzCeVQBL6klQVOUCRdWernAkVWNBOPMDBbEQ4nA6VIEk+8MC+SkF /9YgCQVhOMcQE/zZA1ARoEDAoOshnmc4BGWETNv0njQgn1LQiBF6AxOanol1htKZNy7goENA opqQoJgxCn1xn0pgDu7SHw9EGkWwoCyKAw5qLTKAoW3Uk07wZD2go1CgoRLKoyoQnyAqFw9E CtyJDAgxMzizDMYgQNaADeUAC01KMXBRCYdTFy9xCe/QQBlBCgSiORnhCBxxQdOgCRXzDcXg omn6DAQaIWPCNL8CpS46n54yn9+jCWL6DOTQDBrEEtwJpe+jpGXKp4CqMs7QpARiphBTVH7k UZaFmCk1lWHEUY2VR19YR58FVYAVcRWVV3qFqZ66S39UWHDFRnX1Vv+mKkjqWZR+hUaxqluZ hFK1alF7BZe2l1G56lM1dWrQxH2Q6VA5VqveFKlfuFnbdKStsRCAOqWYcQ0q0zaEMTMiYg0z Aw/W6hbSKjJqsRLWIKNciiIEgjJ2igv/cAzL4Btw8a1HcqIjoSzPOjWYEK77gBdeyjPp4KL4 Yq8PUq+kUaDW0BvquizFwEK2ozIFCqW44Qi8UAliSjMCcR7z+hye8iQ3dX4htUiqSluSWlWc xYpXRFKb6kU7plSXWosfy2kqdU5TVZTwVFh1VE2n2qFPho8YpV+IJrM1JqsmG0av9bOH1lq7 KrTidFWZuqtf2Ksx60eoaLIOZYBR1UjTZlP/EPazgqesQ0UmF1EVVHMYBisbzsMY06A9MboQ f9EWKJIVKNoSIcGk7FIqL1o2hSGdRuE58cMZEBIKd6qi7iKueJEOA/srj8EZ0QCu4CG33LAm AtIZqOEm8TMwppGiIUInLOCZA8VJHfqIxdp+KBlugghgGpdFPup60lRpIEmUpfdkHRpGJVZJ rTRIoDRHAZVudLRIpytpMAZhykS7bCSkoKS6n0tOWyZMFehqmuS6aYZYzAsKM5MddHoYHjKw xHIhfssSCGQO0/utbMsC8eCw7SoU6NonBGoKfyGjdhuggPug7EsvqOEZ/Jk3+Xmnj7seCKSi hAsSdMq4sXG9giEP/9YhDJNrEZgwQAPrvx81hHo3uxBnZ1EWZnp3aqhVl7ervKlkqnkEY2b0 bf7Eup9EUgAWc82mV673wB+2WrtEVeMUu8xrwaLLTJeVSXWpVDV5u8METsrLwjA8TGPXvHhJ JuV6r2Zxt4srHlwhneF6FIA6tmubCt4rp/B6CegauPBANSgxGdxrxCYaIWG6E/VgOIILEHlz phthDA9RGVQcrzNhGna7EmMswF68D0rcJQk6UaUbvBmcxxe2YnuGXhJcZjIlU0jGZWQ2ofEZ yIHcwX9Mf4gcyD+FWZAcS+9UyGRGW5v7w+pZVMALWoiMRTUZuxPqUZJ6yQyFwgTmw0Daxv+S 4CN7YaLU+7bVUBXL48pZHMWME68IrDdCbBHlG7ZN7MRdKhj5gaXKUBSMIabFEhL7qgr0u7Zb PBI5ksbBXMTPMDcAbMQvWr/tKwt1rMBZxUWSdGF0ZMNy9ML7tsikTEZHlc6uG58W+s2hC0rP t7JRW8KRHLrsrMIn3MJU9bGbbKHpLLoedUliGHemTE6ozKy8rMvIwTTUyhKxPM3d+cvU88t2 O67kAA/iMcXKfLd0ixINohD1qb7SYwrOc9EdjRyvnM1MQyLSK83ZTM3A3MQrXSs3+sXEUgnd nEl99ME660nimFhF5nMgV2iye87rJkaQOtTv6cFIlcdQzbw67Ej/UQZImnTHoWXJ7GlbWfW7 MUzKrBnQT/VyqmrQJSZwW+sTVOoboPI1qDA76RIhRWG3vswf/pImUIHEuWElj0Gj7ELFAUq9 jCG5RRMeds0UkSMszZzSLyMlPWHXNPoc2Wwc++u+1ZzSzlI5cKzN8FPRtlxiQSnP+zXaNJnA pXVpjbe5QCuI2/XUwwePPxzCpI3UxarDh/RI3TaznFjV+5xuOjt++5zWuj2PXu3DzdWCYi3a qde5O8xku5XQayMtaesklNsPx4AzWuM4SfMweJoQgt29FL0T07Ia7BMolF2+hPG/i+Enwqw1 4prEW7rFqmM808KdEVLeTcIc18HRC63G/zL92W7h3p1NxLtsFG4701Nt3OToTae7aeOpk2bk 1PMlh46sWzIFX7FtkeTn1KV7sxU+4c/E25IM4haq1TGMXcmkySd+bOmIiUWKX8F90NMmUzpc VMdNAwS0Kf9ZQNLAFS+0QDXqQPgJCwvq4y+02Bg0OT/eQiLEBEvuEU8OpPd1mzSQmypg5aA5 l0pI5TDAbFpe5VheA2HeAmMOBF5+CE8+BSIqDTjKN1yunHBOBmvOAkge53Z+53ie53q+53ze 537+54Ae6II+6IRe6IZ+6Iie6Iq+6Ize6I7+6JAe6ZI+6ZRe6ZZ+6Zie6Zq+6Zze6Z7+6aAe 6qI+6qRe6qZ+6v+onuqqvuqs3uqu/uqwHuuyPuu0Xuu2rucGsAAOsOsJYAAk0OslYADAPgLC vusOsAC+PgIJkAC/zuwmMOzKnuzLPu3LLgLUngAIQALCfu3JruzX7uwiUOy83u0pIO7HTu4A 8O3M/u3oXgLgXu7tXu3angDGDu0qkAAMsOvI7u7Tnu2/ju7CTu7mvu8o8O7W/u0AEPDzXu/o bvAJb+/Pnu8OwAAGL+zzDvC6PvHvvu3UfvDXPuoMEAEPsAD4HgERAO4nH+wR0O0JYPIUH/IR wAAjsOvhbvLtDgApTwI57wARYOw0DwA8v+sPIPLK3vM+j+66PvQPcOxFH/Mln/MF7/L/T+8A 3R70Pg/0DjD0vF7uUB/16P7z1i71MO/w2i72Qy/zM9/zSq/zFb/yTf/yJk/1JmAAXQ8ASS/y TE/3LC/2Jv/uEbAAKn/zCa/0C7AASr/3ZU/uIT/y9G7z1r7reO8AIhD5+i7qPL/xQ+/sda/3 YY/2IxDyaE/zdO/2J1D3Oy/5JgD2dI/2Ld8CnF/0ni8CIU/26R7z5L4ARC8CYO/uEcACi78C Lf8AJQD2LR/7ADD7KED3D0DuLY/6WB/2KN/20m77JID7wl8Cvz/3pJ/wpF/82A/1fZ/4KDD0 /i4CCGDyRS/+st/1BjD05N71dR/qLU/20R/43G/81j7zVC/y/4IPAkCUAGU5lo5jsmq7AknE 0qwRGeYN0w5e72oARC7Fo8mEtMgjglCWZBHGqxSs+Yq0plBGArhOX9HY+rvSiDWmE/gz59Ct d6SuvWlZjLdtGp3pvHkJMbGgmBxCKS4yNjo+QkZKTlJWWmI9MCbCxfApOTRlKm6SGQmFnVB1 NuKZyOQFlv3Bnh6xJCm+RtgijSSGvQrdyAIMKz3AhC20idG0Bjfq8rZyQjsfRixwca6p1uz9 9RUxiNZYb5Jeqq+zt7u/wytla8q2gjL6lEPtJvT3H/pQITDFg37LBO0S6IBWMT73jvF6uCig QleAoCDrxDDcsi9hJNbI2AvKshS7mv8cIWVP36KM1rg1zAFyC4wRN0RR6/NECIIfuLjNkzcG HTKBC+IhTap0KdNJ6dbU+4EKig9PhIoKBFjQn8c6uxZo8cKVYc6pPSLaMsDV41Z/FnMx86ME 1x6ZyXiZMLtqLiBQ/Zp4Uyk17VqLO+UGujOYak0SN6jkTKzk2cWYzYQiKsOPa9POnj+DXod4 X9Qc5PA9aLLxcmZTWBz09BaOUc7Tx2SXAHcr612+ipp4rQPlZ2owMGwLeYBboxLdqPYcLg1A tyveJoAHv6bYNEsWyi97iWymjIOjzH9aFrF8fOv2od/Djy/fBHXS2pkrUnHDqiFZAPG60NEt lUGR00uxmPP/lAjm6TWbMNkYEOEgXVx0EzD8NUSMMYSoMhU20k24hnk3gCXhJjlRRtaHJiyz DEO7DEiCDw6mV9+AWqBDzHw78tjjOo8BwUARgg3Z3XRFuHCTff25dpZJYRE4mSeFhBRlCap9 80aDewlh40xvBQLjCUZugwV/dTW5IZFXnvmGl/qgSAeZF21SFUMhTjfFIdZAA+Q1KWmmo4+D ElooSVNASYd0QzBxRxMewaAkIf5BWgsi5aBXoCc3OYphQ5vsYZ5xvj2IG55gWsQDpzpgKU8i BvgwRhgGtLrmp2WEaoapr/JBzapWtFqKd576ICoAgAUSKZV/LGQRgTkaGq2003bC/0RVD+AY 3Aw5IRAKKHXIquqyTJJbVXaj6vqHtirCQqu1oaxWDHAqgDuHtqj2QotII9HAwBHuIgPvRHV8 W6e2O4lwL4rzVjXGgceKux2r7zZKrmRKHERvHfpIYWcv1hIMlSHa4kWtySc3hYA/7UbYshVA +IOwFXlEKAzLM7dcczE0F5Gzy5NNtrIjarnljM93bKSz0TYLA3M/8doQMxA5G011MU73s/TU NjiDNS1K67AI0VlLakXRPAm9tQ5Ho9y222/DHbfcc9Ndt910H5233nvz3bfffwMeuOCDE164 4YcjnrjiizPeeN53Q163QpNTXrnll2Oeueabc96555+DHly66KOTXrrpp6Nu+nqRs96666/D Hrvss9Neu+2345677rvz3rvvvwMfvPNooZ+88ccjn7zy9Lf8vPRXRx+99NNTX73112Ofvfbb c9+999+DH77445Nfudouo59+CAA7 --------------JavaMail.964842796934-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Tue Dec 20 10:39:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EojZx-0005GL-6u for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:39:05 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA13662 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:38:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EojS9-0003cn-4P; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:31:01 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EojS7-0003cW-1Z for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:30:59 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA12548 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:29:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EojUW-0008FE-Gx for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:33:30 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:200:0:8002:dced:b1df:5637:8594]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CCF15263; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:30:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:30:41 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: brian@innovationslab.net User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: T flag for an IPv6 multicast address with permanent group ID X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org I'm confused about the T flag for an IPv6 multicast address with a permanent group ID and would like to solicit clarification... According to Section 4.2 of RFC3307: Permanent group IDs are allocated on an Expert Review basis, in the range 0x40000000 to 0x7FFFFFFF. These permanent group IDs are meant to be used in IPv6 multicast addresses, defined in [UNIMCAST]. (UNIMCAST=RFC3306) I interpret this as the corresponding IPv6 multicast address being based on a unicast network prefix as defined in RFC3306. Thus the P flag of the 4-bit flags field must be 1, and then the T flag must also be 1 as specified in RFC3306: o If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1, otherwise the setting of the T bit is defined in Section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH]. Meanwhile, Section 4.3 of RFC3307 reads: It should be noted that the high-order bit of the Group ID will be the same value as the T flag. Doesn't this contradict the relationship between the T flag and permanent group IDs? In fact, the high-order bit of a permanent group ID is 0 while the T flag must be 1 as I explained above. Or am I missing something? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Tue Dec 20 11:38:37 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EokVZ-0005ye-04 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:38:37 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA23775 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:37:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EokRz-0004Hx-Po; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:34:55 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EokRx-0004Hh-Uq for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:34:53 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA22610 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:33:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EokUN-0002cu-RB for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:37:26 -0500 Received: from ([128.244.206.105]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRARG.9815673; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:34:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Message-Id: From: Brian Haberman Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:34:09 -0500 To: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?SklOTUVJIFRhdHV5YSAvIBskQj9ATEBDIzpIGyhC?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 287c806b254c6353fcb09ee0e53bbc5e Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: T flag for an IPv6 multicast address with permanent group ID X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0790891150==" Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org --===============0790891150== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-22943509; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" --Apple-Mail-2-22943509 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Dec 20, 2005, at 10:30, JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B wrote: > I'm confused about the T flag for an IPv6 multicast address with a > permanent group ID and would like to solicit clarification... > > According to Section 4.2 of RFC3307: > > Permanent group IDs are allocated on an Expert Review basis, in the > range 0x40000000 to 0x7FFFFFFF. These permanent group IDs are meant > to be used in IPv6 multicast addresses, defined in [UNIMCAST]. > (UNIMCAST=RFC3306) > > I interpret this as the corresponding IPv6 multicast address being > based on a unicast network prefix as defined in RFC3306. Thus the P > flag of the 4-bit flags field must be 1, and then the T flag must also > be 1 as specified in RFC3306: > > o If P = 1, T MUST be set to 1, otherwise the setting of the > T > bit is defined in Section 2.7 of [ADDRARCH]. > > Meanwhile, Section 4.3 of RFC3307 reads: > > It > should be noted that the high-order bit of the Group ID will be the > same value as the T flag. > > Doesn't this contradict the relationship between the T flag and > permanent group IDs? In fact, the high-order bit of a permanent group > ID is 0 while the T flag must be 1 as I explained above. > Section 4.3 only deals with multicast addresses allocated dynamically. That is, they are administered locally either by an allocation server (as described in Section 4.3.1) or by an end-host (Section 4.3.2). Are you considering the case where addresses with permanent group IDs are allocated by a server? We didn't consider that scenario. Multicast Addresses created using permanent group IDs (Section 4.2) does not mention the T flag mainly because addresses generated by RFC 3306 are not permanent. Rather, they only have a lifetime equivalent to the lifetime of the embedded prefix. Does that clarify things? Regards, Brian --Apple-Mail-2-22943509 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIGJDCCAt0w ggJGoAMCAQICAw+FFTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUwOTIxMTM1ODA5WhcNMDYwOTIxMTM1ODA5WjBKMR8wHQYDVQQD ExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMScwJQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhhicmlhbkBpbm5vdmF0aW9u c2xhYi5uZXQwggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDENC3Ku7xMi2aksDT7lH6s IwI58FJea6uFN5S4en+fkPJM1MY1hKlMY2sSXQ+937lvjUkJNv9ARXpe4SaATcA4reGMOZZ0OML6 mQIZOOU1+9jOxExTVfkr7aLD8PHEEoOy7qpLCsFJ76Bhh735AVcn1BnnW4Dz5wkCjtNS50DVnpdf NOoHQTVoJOTeA/NctEHswn3BIJRcltCDwfRklznEHbi4YAv4V3mgZ6Gf4r5dheBw9z530gOSVmUm eQF00Ka5aXPn5v5pSJTkdeWLt86Lv+dNGfZfdJZzCiucggyuclTaomw5mOvGY5uWjY4QPc3uMw0A wUYo/hj2/kP+UWWtAgMBAAGjNTAzMCMGA1UdEQQcMBqBGGJyaWFuQGlubm92YXRpb25zbGFiLm5l dDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAARo9StWhGnVXFSPKeY1dVV4xrUQyhrS VH8kjiQnYAlvTlco3DdE0bATIof8BrmkN+K1v2DdeLKR0siNkx1jL3d4enOFKqFitfvpW2HrrpM3 bWYa5HQJG3avYNM/B4JDHI9y2l42cNfvjp43R5TYP9VnKuhzB3OYHYAnNMvA2QtwMIIDPzCCAqig AwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4g Q2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYG A1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBl cnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0aGF3 dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAj BgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDEpjxV c1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1osiRVwjt3J8CuF Wqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9IBH+nttE8 YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0fBDwwOjA4oDag NIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxDQS5jcmwwCwYD VR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAg k3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbq NOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCAucwggLjAgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPhRUwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAVMwGAYJKoZIhvcN AQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDUxMjIwMTYzNDEwWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0B CQQxFgQU5ag4nSJ9t1mGuQzzsRVOvDdEXzIweAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3Rl IFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAw+FFTB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNV BAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPhRUwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQAEggEAeduOR1mO5jXFxyWyylkdIWd4GJVNcVoLqNB4P5sANIn09YrpKdErrFFBMKi4QukuoG3l zlSv8pf6a0XAFMPOXXV/TIXtRzBHQm+MwUQPgkyv5ZvFEJKgbW6Vv4FFzyER7pTEm61OrAsiMoHy k2VVPBJ4QMu23SsUpUGgIlKGHUgiEQbq9/0cnOzQLAxu4l/kJcQvqgTPVIq8TgjE5J15INnqpvgI 53YrAE8j/wpKBsZQEnN8RUHbx3eetlL4qUKt4S+cO9VgDQQVZUbla+kagLSte1bvotxFBtBIfHAf /BbmYU6ixnlJIRgnjOn5TLqD6hWySy5fKn1pVZT4eNAYiQAAAAAAAA== --Apple-Mail-2-22943509-- --===============0790891150== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- --===============0790891150==-- From aa@ss.com Tue Dec 20 21:39:13 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eotsn-00035P-1E for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:39:13 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA09224 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:38:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:38:06 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512210238.VAA09224@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?JSUlJSW1zbzb16rIw7y4uPa+rdOqsru07bXEzfjVvqOsv8nV+8zlwvKjrNKy?= =?GB2312?B?v8nS1LWltsDC8iUlJSUl16PKpbWuv+zA1g==?= To: ipngwg-archive@lists.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:39:16 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] ��ѯ��www.51oyea.com) �й��Ʒ��(www.cnjinshu.com) ��ݶ��www.ye2.net) ��ʳ��ɣ�www.dbdb.cn) ̨��ҵ�˲��www.tzqy.com.cn) �ƹ��(www.itsend.com) ��ϵ�绰��013516877179(��) QQ��460560908 114103407 MSN��fsghome@hotmail.com �ͼ�ת�ü��Ӫ��վ��Ҳ��Ե�� From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 21 00:24:54 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EowT8-00012b-PH for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:24:54 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA23066 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:23:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EowSM-0000qz-72; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:24:06 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EowSJ-0000p3-8J for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:24:03 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA22989 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:22:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp ([202.249.10.124]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EowUp-0005aQ-4Q for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:26:41 -0500 Received: from impact.jinmei.org (unknown [3ffe:501:100f:1010:dced:b1df:5637:8594]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CC81521A; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:23:54 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:23:52 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: Brian Haberman In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034 Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: T flag for an IPv6 multicast address with permanent group ID X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Hello, thanks for the prompt response. >>>>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:34:09 -0500, >>>>> Brian Haberman said: > Section 4.3 only deals with multicast addresses allocated dynamically. > That is, they are administered locally either by an allocation server > (as described in Section 4.3.1) or by an end-host (Section 4.3.2). Hmm, so the following phrase of Section 4.3 the high-order bit of the Group ID will be the same value as the T flag just means "the high-order bit of the Group ID of a dynamic IPv6 multicast address will be the same value as the T flag of the dynamic IPv6 multicast address". I originally thought this is an 'if-and-only-if' relationship, that is, - if the high-order bit of the Group ID is 1, then the T flag is also 1, and - if the high-order bit of the Group ID is 0, then the T flag is also 0. But I understand that's not the intention of the RFC. (Then I personally wonder whether this really "should be noted", though...) Anyway, I think it's not clear. Thanks, JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 21 04:24:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep0Ca-0002Ov-KL for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:24:05 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA14143 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:23:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep0A3-0001c5-DW; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:21:27 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep0A1-0001bx-Sh for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:21:25 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA13997 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:20:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from j069063.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp ([61.213.69.63] helo=z505.arifumi.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ep0Cb-0004Jd-8m for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:24:06 -0500 Received: from unknown (ietf.pflab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.16.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z505.arifumi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC1EF19F7 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:19:57 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:20:44 +0900 From: Arifumi Matsumoto To: ipv6@ietf.org Message-Id: <20051221182044.09381311.a@arifumi.net> In-Reply-To: <439D347F.50707@zurich.ibm.com> References: <200512070209.jB729dHY077351@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> <439D347F.50707@zurich.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.8 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-ipv6-rfc3484-update-00.txt X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Firstly, according to a minutes of the last shim6 meeting, http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/05nov/minutes/shim6.html this issue of revising RFC3484 was passed to AD. I want to know if this proposal was arranged by AD. IMHO, these new functions look very effective and desirable to solve address selection problems. At the same time, however, inserting these rules into RFC3484 seems to involve such a tough modification to protocol stack. I suppose we should separate some already-raised issues about updating RFC3484 from these radical issues. -- Arifumi Matsumoto -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Wed Dec 21 11:33:05 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep6tk-0004vB-Cg for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:33:05 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11498 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:31:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep6rk-0004Qq-2l; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:31:00 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep6ri-0004Qd-8A for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:30:58 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA11258 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:29:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr ([64.208.49.57]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ep6uL-0004E3-KN for ipv6@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:33:43 -0500 Received: from nmu.alcatel.fr (tcmh80.nmu.alcatel.fr [139.54.143.3]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/NETFR) with ESMTP id jBLGUduR008570; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:30:40 +0100 Received: from alcatel.fr (jura [192.200.245.157]) by nmu.alcatel.fr (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA14555; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:30:39 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <43A9832E.3090709@alcatel.fr> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:30:38 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?laurent_cl=E9vy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francis Dupont References: <200512170954.jBH9spHJ038447@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> In-Reply-To: <200512170954.jBH9spHJ038447@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Alcanet-MTA-scanned-and-authorized: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by smail2.alcatel.fr id jBLGUduR008570 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: Re: two questions about SEND X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, We have in Alcatel a partial implementation of SEND in our labs. By partial, I mean with CGA and RSA options only, and supposed compliant=20 to RFC 3972 and partially 3971. Kind regards, Laurent Cl=E9vy Francis Dupont wrote: >I have two questions about SEND: > - is an "open source" or not implementation available? > - in the RFC 3971 section 6.4.3 Trust Anchor Option page 35, > an anchor name of type FQDN is "stored as a string, in the > DNS wire format, as specified in RFC 1034" but obviously > ^^^^ > this name is a dNSName for SubjectAltName, i.e., the > example trustanchor.example.com is encoded into > 't' 'r' 'u' ... 'e' '.' 'c' 'o' 'm' > and not > 11 't' 'r' 'u' ... 'e' 3 'c' 'o' 'm' 0 > which is the real format used on the wire but is useful only > when names are directly given to DNS internal routines. > BTW this wire format should be referenced by section 3.1 of > RFC 1035 (not 1034), so I think the word "wire" is a typo, > isn't it? > >Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr > >-------------------------------------------------------------------- >IETF IPv6 working group mailing list >ipv6@ietf.org >Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 >-------------------------------------------------------------------- > > =20 > --=20 Alcatel CIT Route de Nozay 91460 Marcoussis Voice +33 (0)1 6963 1834 Fax +33 (0)1 6963 1767 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From syntony@activepcsupport.com Wed Dec 21 11:53:06 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ep7D8-0005dm-5d for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:53:06 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA14436 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:52:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from [87.97.25.5] (helo=localhost) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ep7Fe-00050w-Bk for ipngwg-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:55:51 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c60679$1634b400$0100007f@localhost> From: "Brett Lewis" To: Subject: cheap oem soft shipping //orldwide Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:54:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60679.1634B400" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 093efd19b5f651b2707595638f6c4003 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60679.1634B400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable.TOP.10.NEW.TITLES.ON.SALE.NOW!.1.Office.Pro.2003.2.Adobe.Photoshop.9.0.3.Windows.XP.Pro.4.Adobe.Acrobat.7.Pro.5.Flash.MX.2004.6.Corel.Draw.12.7.Norton.Antivirus.2005.8.Windows.2003.Se ListPrice: $550.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #1 Average Customer Review: (based on 42 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP Professional by Microsoft ListPrice: $200.00 OurPrice: $49.95 YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #2 Average Customer Review: (based on 41 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0 by Adobe ListPrice: $599.00 OurPrice: $69.95 YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%) Availability: Available for INSTANT download! Sales Rank: #3 Average Customer Review: (based on 47 reviews) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60679.1634B400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Software

TOP 10 NEW TITLES

ON SALE NOW!
1 Office Pro 2003
2 Adobe Photoshop 9.0
3 Windows XP Pro
4 Adobe Acrobat 7 Pro
5 Flash MX 2004
6 Corel Draw 12
7 ! Norton Antivirus 2005
8 Windows 2003 Server
9 Alias Maya 6 Wavefrt
10 Adobe Illustrator 11
See more by this manufacturer
! ; Microsoft
Symantec
Adobe

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $550.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download! !

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 40 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
   by Microsoft

ListPrice: $200.00
OurPrice: $49.95
YouSave: $150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 37 revi! ews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
   by Adobe

ListPrice: $599.00
OurPrice: $69.95
YouSave: $529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 38 reviews)
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C60679.1634B400-- From Cbujo@optonline.com Wed Dec 21 20:05:20 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpEtU-0007ur-MU; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:05:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA05962; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:04:16 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512220104.UAA05962@ietf.org> Received: from [218.147.81.215] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EpEwC-00060G-B0; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:08:10 -0500 From: "Jan Hodges" To: ssm-admin@ietf.org Subject: Fw: ... Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:05:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_CDLVMGHU.UCQXXBRE" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_CDLVMGHU.UCQXXBRE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your existant homeloan qualifies you to get princely benefits. Our database will reconcile you with the most experienced broker, so that you will have more funds in your account at the end of each month. Its really not complex.. Thousands of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their residences every day. Now its your turn. This quick 1 minute form will be your next rung on the ladder towards real monetary security. With kindest regards, Jan Hodges Should you wish not to acheive this opening offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_CDLVMGHU.UCQXXBRE Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your existant homeloan qualifies you to get princely benefits.

Our database will reconcile you with the most experienced broker, so that you will have more funds in your account at the end of each month.

Its really not complex..

Thousands of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their residences every day.

Now its your turn.

This quick 1 minute form will be your next rung on the ladder towards real monetary security.

With kindest regards,

Jan Hodges

Should you wish not to acheive this opening offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_CDLVMGHU.UCQXXBRE-- From aa@ss.com Wed Dec 21 20:59:07 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpFjX-0004Rp-Ro for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:59:07 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10688 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:58:01 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512220158.UAA10688@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+KOod3d3LnllMi5uZXQptc2829X7zOXXqsjD?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:59:05 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�ã�ת�üۣ�2.5��

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-87797916��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407��1283511

From aa@ss.com Thu Dec 22 00:31:00 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpJ2a-0003cm-Rv for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:31:00 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA29303 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:29:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512220529.AAA29303@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+KOod3d3LnllMi5uZXQptc2829X7zOXXqsjD?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:30:58 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�ã�ת�üۣ�2.5��

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-87797916��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407��1283511

From YvonneMccoy@1newyorkplace.com Thu Dec 22 05:44:20 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpNvn-00070w-3d; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:44:20 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA24291; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:43:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EpNyZ-0005fr-55; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:47:13 -0500 Received: from eoo20.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl ([83.20.30.20]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EpNvL-0000x0-9Q; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:44:00 -0500 Received: from nnL@localhost by f2pA.int (8.11.6/8.11.6); Thu, 22 Dec 2005 06:39:08 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Yvonne Mclain" Reply-To: "Yvonne Mclain" To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: 80 % Discount on All Windows XP Titles Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:36:08 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.2730.2 X-Sender: YvonneMccoy@1newyorkplace.com Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--rVNKIMfarZH4oZ8" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cbb41f2dbf0f142369614756642005e3 xWjf ----rVNKIMfarZH4oZ8 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable r

Opt-in Email Special Offer = ; unsubscribe me

Microsoft Windows XP Professional *= w/SP2*
Microsoft

List Price:		$299.00
Price:		$49.99
You Save:		$249.0= 1 (80%)

= Availability: Available for INSTANT download!
Coupon Code: = kcqolU2qE
Platform: Windows XP

Sales Rank: #1=
System requirements | Other Versions
Date= Coupon Expires: December 31st, 2005
= Average Customer Review: 3D"5 Based on 1169 reviews. Write a review.

----rVNKIMfarZH4oZ8-- From gay@abc-airsea.com Thu Dec 22 09:39:16 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpRb9-0003m7-S5; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:39:16 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA19585; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:38:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EpRdv-0004qh-3W; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:42:10 -0500 Received: from 65.red-83-54-209.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.54.209.65]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EpRau-000174-71; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:39:00 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (83.54.209.65 [83.54.209.65]) by 65.246.255.50 with ESMTP id e71si41[7]qbe.2005.97.74.47.46.37; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:38:29 -0600 Message-ID: <030m521e.0311066@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:38:29 -0600 From: "Emmett Macdonald" X-PGP-Key: KTSauhodXPQ766yrNJcO8vk7tvebzCuzFT3VWEypPwnxAu06I8DaJz3JBlJVC17N== X-Mime-Key: Base64 (wrNyYskHyPp5LrfrfXONnuI2sSLl) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internet-drafts@ietf.org Cc: internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org, ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org, iporpr-admin@ietf.org X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: apache set sender to gay@abc-airsea.com using -f Subject: Pre-approved Application #420477138 Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:38:29 -0600 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------JavaMail.577244078074" X-Spam-Score: 4.8 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 6ba8aaf827dcb437101951262f69b3de This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------JavaMail.577244078074 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

may cryptanalysis may fiske or knick and warehouse the tent try advisor ! porphyry it segovia and animal in rod a dearborn be corbett the reeve on airline Or maybe not

--------------JavaMail.577244078074 Content-Type: image/gif; name="demitted.3.gif" Content-ID: <5.0.0.20.0.86692145474785.12228717@namesake.msn.com.9> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="demitted.3.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhTAJyAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZmZlm/2Zm/2Zm ZmYz/zMz/zMzMzMA/wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAABMAnIAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8Tq/b7/i8fs/v+/+AgYKDhIWG h4iJiouIAQKPjwEAjpKPJQKSAJCbIpuRKpgpAgMEBAOZnQKXl6gknq2uJp6hjq8yqiehl6Sm uCO1kJnAkLulA76yKgG8BLojs8gtjqAoAqW4w5+rJZTFvSTZuM6dvMfgs7CM6tUFpdeTBZID 8SPzme3upiL4pQUFAykKRBMRgMC/UQYBipjnil4ngSf4JZTlcIQ7fKoESCSQbkWAiiSagTPY jFQ7VBov/3LU1M/dL5IIT5r4OHBhu2Pz/pHYqPCFxhQ0TcwzSWBSvlLpdIKrWLBdzJUsSZba 58vaQaKZUubruK7rw5kOp8LzBdFE2UnzikYc+BHqQ7UafU20ieJs3BJzLxVoeONjz2dnAbx7 JlbTXotqqS51yxIkgLQn5iFr2jPwrcOR25lVSApVYbOBP3oWSTix4hFl27ZK+dWra1CYfzm8 +9nyacA1bX/GvU9h28S7USMLnDI2YL42NDrOaw+swp/HhYc0/WtgO8t3k0mvAT2iwWhKTQRH jVR2pubcwgMIXHa8ru6v4yNfOhr97Z0Dx1sOekKsWMkQ8WeWLwIKxpFt8ME3Q/9Kf2ll0V8k MGTYdPjJVlMu8ew23oDJGQdYQdRJ1h91O/Fingj6ZFahdAViKN+LgOWjimgvqbfeUQrZJmEJ 2HlYz2EaSaKPPkHW1cwomlloIEUNHcVVCtdUZIxaLX5oGCTfrTihC1MViRqERuYD5goKImYY LJDhRaJwIBJET5UPocJeRj7q5SSMXsUVDDytZLnTkcSsN1CZguolymE03WUPKQFJFY2E2UX3 kC0wTJVikNDReAKNxZkCi13GZcPben9ht8k9gFoCA6HZ2WgYYxsW6heftG5a0ZxbwkYpnuqU qemr1NlWaAk7ahknCoyiOECyNKW4log8+iMtdQnWWVr/eTwCVGSXbwp75pn6VQUSiP1YJK20 IUHITFneEiQjk+Kd68+mn8VaVlw0wvntfRB5eSiv8vnqkF+zbsdjfmvu562zJvXUz4WFYjtp ABTbl+vFm57KIal3abqhWD9pBOZZBYtH5T8UO3KWxaO2O4nGhqZ3CsWRLiXXmrcNFRbOtQ03 o8sYA7yOwJmAfGtujwqrG2M2oeSP046tWC91zl5M6Av8pXWyOAjeC6RlgUHbEC7JmunmmoUB TaaHZaMIV6k3B4SMQbN17bPUTD/GtdCvEX2l2cMe/MtQddU0mFGhJUmeCqkpVfNjFVVrg6Yf nXVWXpAn1p3EgaNIXJIlTxoj/ypNkQVxCwqG/rfITQO+sbmeqZemwcOCSGCaV/OdCNFtypaj vGrJ61RA8obEz/B4PTqmwbSRKGC18j7pYj2mfZZTP+rB17NQ/lzUk7+uW6XScMDHoJy0j0T9 Hz7q2RtNQa1cT/fId7t7fHjnSyu97oBQvClBMxFGylJGkAHuz4CwGAYK0uE/oLTCfw3kBuke iMAYRBCAv0ggzDIIDgpmbE8cDOBMOCFBA1oQgRcM4cvGMYknpXASIwShBDvIDRJm0IT8y6EO d8jDHvrwh0AMohCHSMQiGvGISEyiEpfIxCY68YlQTIICFBBFIx5AAQcgwRWzqAMIUHEJCoBA FU1wAP8IcLEECpCABL5YhAM0QI1sRGMcFdAACDTgjACgox3xWAI32jGOfvQiGiFgxxQIEgsQ WKMIGtCAERySB4mUgBsl0EgdlJGPeRQjFBh5AwloUgSJ5IEiwSiBMfZRkiegJBaNcABPRvKT I2glG9/oxURykZZvRKUJ0ljLUbaSkomsJACCSUsUjPIKifwiIUdwTEuuEYtvFCYOWonJNEZh mTZI4xe1Kco4IsGapoylLkvQTCLUcZhelCYofUlJR4qxlcL05AmwOUxUvpGL3OQmAOCZSm9m gZ7lnOY4e0DNXZYSCvSsQSgBIE8S6LEBc8TjFPv5UD4+FIurnKhDvxhIiKL/wJph3GMf6/jH kRLyjrHE6ElRsMWLpjSk+CTkI1lK0jtqdIodPeMVMylSEVwRpiJwaVC9qVGezjSodYRoQdHo yVUG9aRnnGIY1TmCkN5xpyZYZkKrCsegjhOkXx3oPo8pS4ZKs50JfWM/Y0lSfwaSiqts6UpX gFWfzpGKO70iIVf5zKRi0qFQrStbVXmALW6xqmzUY0+rmlQsijWPB0VqSffp1KBudJdTLORT 95jXkFY2pEdNATzvSYJE9vKTzdyqCNRIyVye0bR09KQ9IztWvKoRosE8QRpvG8Z2+pS3ufWq HevIztsWk4yyxW1Dd8vJekL0uLo17ivX6UlGdhWy/8HsbSWZW0nYmtarePRtdqFbz3SyFpOm FeQvldtd3iJXlaalLVdlitxk+hSPaj2nOIk6UEqWdQRq9S14TTBKWsZ2nAampSJ/2dqGivaY av0tXEtZRjWakaHGVeNf19vbhWoxvYVFJTZJC4AEa9iRTc3lY8FZ3g6vVphpPKOAUazKscJX tvt8JRfH6+AV7DaOb0ysb1MLS2ays5JB5ioq/4tOUF7Yq/7c7RmTjM6oLnjGpP0lPgP6SyE3 Mo3CJPFYi/xbWH63vKVFpZQBrEgws9nLTuZqFsXcSk1SGbKPZSgbbfnmevpznVNW40ctzEdb BnSsjdxqOVns5KV6Vc9afP9smwVcZ68Ks8s23vKfS4vaAh+UxQA98jwRLGjkcrGg8NSnPte5 yGOumamthjOJgxvjrB6Tz62OLD3p3GMVKFqdESZyKs2syRmXWJcLLas2C8ts1a46zstmdhnF GGRp85OfzHSrsdVa6xdbW8xs5mNDPfzbL5dzmd02awki3O2G+lfapN12nkf57CaT26Hnlm8J IilkKh56oYrm777NOFBrNtPR2W4yvqm4VW5ie7Wb5uqEselbUKOW2Ab15r1/e2pd7vaThLQ2 N+VdzYPKG9FjPqhq6ynxfesatVdlNrgNCUuEjzWLwiZwHJdp86WWdaG7Za3QDUr0oAtd0JE8 ujz/Ec5lsVKTxQxWeiC1SmZsqhbd+garOPm4VHnWOupHDzHX573NrJdy5ZAlOs3tW2lIu3zH RV60fENe8FIeXNL+9qciA3rl8EacmYn2oiS7bfGEu1Pt+D6Bz8d54tUqHY49XzGFnT7bYy/7 359k9KPjbOPH/zWrNZc7zndOZrfHmckDbjS99T1oE3Cb9ZxXfH+1zd8rRhb1G5Wqwjkd+8Nr /thplzBTtzxt4cu+9msNPgnUivbfRxgFy0SrK9Ob5kBHGvmAR71WpZnuhBsb0t/vOwkOve41 rhGe9Cw8xHkP6/LLvuNbdvD3jS9nouO+1tpEqx1hn359Px+buAcDilZk/wAnTZpFTqS3WkXG ax6GegFYb+3kgJMmURfGdNqmTqHEaMZ2aN3XdrgmfBBobuNHgLQlWzKmTqPUazO3frVFToHH UvmmeHEWclI1RU3VZ/XXamPXbwwFS+30fLs3flQEhJA1Z/LlcLPHAr9kZ9elfACVgKekcay3 eFmUagVGgMW2gJKngC5HY1nEXND3SbjnYQCFgn/HflwVZp6macnHeW6Wa3gUXID2W5LnS7iG a1qmgFumSRb4Xmo4YQvnU/aVSrq0hNTVcZ92XRX2hbT1hpa3fD2mTxVWdmpIdijGUXyGdn4m iKWGb4FXb6Z3Z8zEhw1VRu1VhUC3higHWX92Zf9PxktlFn+25XdP9XmD+EuJF3s553KY2ImR Bn8Kl2UCFk2WxmZbCFl/OF9GZotmZoed2H+9uE2hdXjlJ1szll7zZ3q7l0uRBG7dV16R9Fdg 5kpNCI6NZ2OE5GB9eEqvdFubx2bpSH45Ro70hU7Y+IqyFY9lV43dGIXlp4+QaI0rqI3YOEqa aI445npHV3qeJnV4dmZ4RofhiGL8Bo9yiIBeRY/4Ro5Jto6ayGgH6ISoBYW2Fo8bd3McJ2bY 9HHuaIzdeIzHJpAYuUil13sISYawREsVuU41uU8bJlXVpHsshUeFpUVAuU9kpFtCqXhVuJS5 92c12Ed9hEnU9FOVVZT/fXSUPqZ7WIluTmlNVqlFVKmVUklGZPlScTWUcoRTsfR5aOmTLOVZ aumT1qZTTplHd1VZQ6WXlFVUZGSXd7mXVXhqU9mCoqVFhXlfbSmWosWVn0eUcLmYdsWWWcmW G0aUZ+lTZcmUZjlRWBmZaImZbqlDNlcEHwl7hHCQf+BG4dSav6gEp8kIqumatBkIoxkEn/mX tbmbvNmbvvmbwBmcwjmcxFmcxnmcyJmcjSBDM7AMR+CcBaMqoBAofbE8TGAV3rIrR3AKBGGd OeCcFrEDfqkErGkFUjaQMzCeVQBL6klQVOUCRdWernAkVWNBOPMDBbEQ4nA6VIEk+8MC+SkF /9YgCQVhOMcQE/zZA1ARoEDAoOshnmc4BGWETNv0njQgn1LQiBF6AxOanol1htKZNy7goENA opqQoJgxCn1xn0pgDu7SHw9EGkWwoCyKAw5qLTKAoW3Uk07wZD2go1CgoRLKoyoQnyAqFw9E CtyJDAgxMzizDMYgQNaADeUAC01KMXBRCYdTFy9xCe/QQBlBCgSiORnhCBxxQdOgCRXzDcXg omn6DAQaIWPCNL8CpS46n54yn9+jCWL6DOTQDBrEEtwJpe+jpGXKp4CqMs7QpARiphBTVH7k UZaFmCk1lWHEUY2VR19YR58FVYAVcRWVV3qFqZ66S39UWHDFRnX1Vv+mKkjqWZR+hUaxqluZ hFK1alF7BZe2l1G56lM1dWrQxH2Q6VA5VqveFKlfuFnbdKStsRCAOqWYcQ0q0zaEMTMiYg0z Aw/W6hbSKjJqsRLWIKNciiIEgjJ2igv/cAzL4Btw8a1HcqIjoSzPOjWYEK77gBdeyjPp4KL4 Yq8PUq+kUaDW0BvquizFwEK2ozIFCqW44Qi8UAliSjMCcR7z+hye8iQ3dX4htUiqSluSWlWc xYpXRFKb6kU7plSXWosfy2kqdU5TVZTwVFh1VE2n2qFPho8YpV+IJrM1JqsmG0av9bOH1lq7 KrTidFWZuqtf2Ksx60eoaLIOZYBR1UjTZlP/EPazgqesQ0UmF1EVVHMYBisbzsMY06A9MboQ f9EWKJIVKNoSIcGk7FIqL1o2hSGdRuE58cMZEBIKd6qi7iKueJEOA/srj8EZ0QCu4CG33LAm AtIZqOEm8TMwppGiIUInLOCZA8VJHfqIxdp+KBlugghgGpdFPup60lRpIEmUpfdkHRpGJVZJ rTRIoDRHAZVudLRIpytpMAZhykS7bCSkoKS6n0tOWyZMFehqmuS6aYZYzAsKM5MddHoYHjKw xHIhfssSCGQO0/utbMsC8eCw7SoU6NonBGoKfyGjdhuggPug7EsvqOEZ/Jk3+Xmnj7seCKSi hAsSdMq4sXG9giEP/9YhDJNrEZgwQAPrvx81hHo3uxBnZ1EWZnp3aqhVl7ervKlkqnkEY2b0 bf7Eup9EUgAWc82mV673wB+2WrtEVeMUu8xrwaLLTJeVSXWpVDV5u8METsrLwjA8TGPXvHhJ JuV6r2Zxt4srHlwhneF6FIA6tmubCt4rp/B6CegauPBANSgxGdxrxCYaIWG6E/VgOIILEHlz phthDA9RGVQcrzNhGna7EmMswF68D0rcJQk6UaUbvBmcxxe2YnuGXhJcZjIlU0jGZWQ2ofEZ yIHcwX9Mf4gcyD+FWZAcS+9UyGRGW5v7w+pZVMALWoiMRTUZuxPqUZJ6yQyFwgTmw0Daxv+S 4CN7YaLU+7bVUBXL48pZHMWME68IrDdCbBHlG7ZN7MRdKhj5gaXKUBSMIabFEhL7qgr0u7Zb PBI5ksbBXMTPMDcAbMQvWr/tKwt1rMBZxUWSdGF0ZMNy9ML7tsikTEZHlc6uG58W+s2hC0rP t7JRW8KRHLrsrMIn3MJU9bGbbKHpLLoedUliGHemTE6ozKy8rMvIwTTUyhKxPM3d+cvU88t2 O67kAA/iMcXKfLd0ixINohD1qb7SYwrOc9EdjRyvnM1MQyLSK83ZTM3A3MQrXSs3+sXEUgnd nEl99ME660nimFhF5nMgV2iye87rJkaQOtTv6cFIlcdQzbw67Ej/UQZImnTHoWXJ7GlbWfW7 MUzKrBnQT/VyqmrQJSZwW+sTVOoboPI1qDA76RIhRWG3vswf/pImUIHEuWElj0Gj7ELFAUq9 jCG5RRMeds0UkSMszZzSLyMlPWHXNPoc2Wwc++u+1ZzSzlI5cKzN8FPRtlxiQSnP+zXaNJnA pXVpjbe5QCuI2/XUwwePPxzCpI3UxarDh/RI3TaznFjV+5xuOjt++5zWuj2PXu3DzdWCYi3a qde5O8xku5XQayMtaesklNsPx4AzWuM4SfMweJoQgt29FL0T07Ia7BMolF2+hPG/i+Enwqw1 4prEW7rFqmM808KdEVLeTcIc18HRC63G/zL92W7h3p1NxLtsFG4701Nt3OToTae7aeOpk2bk 1PMlh46sWzIFX7FtkeTn1KV7sxU+4c/E25IM4haq1TGMXcmkySd+bOmIiUWKX8F90NMmUzpc VMdNAwS0Kf9ZQNLAFS+0QDXqQPgJCwvq4y+02Bg0OT/eQiLEBEvuEU8OpPd1mzSQmypg5aA5 l0pI5TDAbFpe5VheA2HeAmMOBF5+CE8+BSIqDTjKN1yunHBOBmvOAkge53Z+53ie53q+53ze 537+54Ae6II+6IRe6IZ+6Iie6Iq+6Ize6I7+6JAe6ZI+6ZRe6ZZ+6Zie6Zq+6Zze6Z7+6aAe 6qI+6qRe6qZ+6v+onuqqvuqs3uqu/uqwHuuyPuu0Xuu2rucGsAAOsOsJYAAk0OslYADAPgLC vusOsAC+PgIJkAC/zuwmMOzKnuzLPu3LLgLUngAIQALCfu3JruzX7uwiUOy83u0pIO7HTu4A 8O3M/u3oXgLgXu7tXu3angDGDu0qkAAMsOvI7u7Tnu2/ju7CTu7mvu8o8O7W/u0AEPDzXu/o bvAJb+/Pnu8OwAAGL+zzDvC6PvHvvu3UfvDXPuoMEAEPsAD4HgERAO4nH+wR0O0JYPIUH/IR wAAjsOvhbvLtDgApTwI57wARYOw0DwA8v+sPIPLK3vM+j+66PvQPcOxFH/Mln/MF7/L/T+8A 3R70Pg/0DjD0vF7uUB/16P7z1i71MO/w2i72Qy/zM9/zSq/zFb/yTf/yJk/1JmAAXQ8ASS/y TE/3LC/2Jv/uEbAAKn/zCa/0C7AASr/3ZU/uIT/y9G7z1r7reO8AIhD5+i7qPL/xQ+/sda/3 YY/2IxDyaE/zdO/2J1D3Oy/5JgD2dI/2Ld8CnF/0ni8CIU/26R7z5L4ARC8CYO/uEcACi78C Lf8AJQD2LR/7ADD7KED3D0DuLY/6WB/2KN/20m77JID7wl8Cvz/3pJ/wpF/82A/1fZ/4KDD0 /i4CCGDyRS/+st/1BjD05N71dR/qLU/20R/43G/81j7zVC/y/4IPAkCUAGU5lo5jsmq7AknE 0qwRGeYN0w5e72oARC7Fo8mEtMgjglCWZBHGqxSs+Yq0plBGArhOX9HY+rvSiDWmE/gz59Ct d6SuvWlZjLdtGp3pvHkJMbGgmBxCKS4yNjo+QkZKTlJWWmI9MCbCxfApOTRlKm6SGQmFnVB1 NuKZyOQFlv3Bnh6xJCm+RtgijSSGvQrdyAIMKz3AhC20idG0Bjfq8rZyQjsfRixwca6p1uz9 9RUxiNZYb5Jeqq+zt7u/wytla8q2gjL6lEPtJvT3H/pQITDFg37LBO0S6IBWMT73jvF6uCig QleAoCDrxDDcsi9hJNbI2AvKshS7mv8cIWVP36KM1rg1zAFyC4wRN0RR6/NECIIfuLjNkzcG HTKBC+IhTap0KdNJ6dbU+4EKig9PhIoKBFjQn8c6uxZo8cKVYc6pPSLaMsDV41Z/FnMx86ME 1x6ZyXiZMLtqLiBQ/Zp4Uyk17VqLO+UGujOYak0SN6jkTKzk2cWYzYQiKsOPa9POnj+DXod4 X9Qc5PA9aLLxcmZTWBz09BaOUc7Tx2SXAHcr612+ipp4rQPlZ2owMGwLeYBboxLdqPYcLg1A tyveJoAHv6bYNEsWyi97iWymjIOjzH9aFrF8fOv2od/Djy/fBHXS2pkrUnHDqiFZAPG60NEt lUGR00uxmPP/lAjm6TWbMNkYEOEgXVx0EzD8NUSMMYSoMhU20k24hnk3gCXhJjlRRtaHJiyz DEO7DEiCDw6mV9+AWqBDzHw78tjjOo8BwUARgg3Z3XRFuHCTff25dpZJYRE4mSeFhBRlCap9 80aDewlh40xvBQLjCUZugwV/dTW5IZFXnvmGl/qgSAeZF21SFUMhTjfFIdZAA+Q1KWmmo4+D ElooSVNASYd0QzBxRxMewaAkIf5BWgsi5aBXoCc3OYphQ5vsYZ5xvj2IG55gWsQDpzpgKU8i BvgwRhgGtLrmp2WEaoapr/JBzapWtFqKd576ICoAgAUSKZV/LGQRgTkaGq2003bC/0RVD+AY 3Aw5IRAKKHXIquqyTJJbVXaj6vqHtirCQqu1oaxWDHAqgDuHtqj2QotII9HAwBHuIgPvRHV8 W6e2O4lwL4rzVjXGgceKux2r7zZKrmRKHERvHfpIYWcv1hIMlSHa4kWtySc3hYA/7UbYshVA +IOwFXlEKAzLM7dcczE0F5Gzy5NNtrIjarnljM93bKSz0TYLA3M/8doQMxA5G011MU73s/TU NjiDNS1K67AI0VlLakXRPAm9tQ5Ho9y222/DHbfcc9Ndt910H5233nvz3bfffwMeuOCDE164 4YcjnrjiizPeeN53Q163QpNTXrnll2Oeueabc96555+DHly66KOTXrrpp6Nu+nqRs96666/D Hrvss9Neu+2345677rvz3rvvvwMfvPNw3F+88ccjn7zyjwjAvTTCSx+99NNTX73112Ofvfbb c9+999+DH77445Niqtwvo59+CAA7 --------------JavaMail.577244078074-- From aa@ss.com Thu Dec 22 17:49:04 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpZFA-00009v-JI for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:49:04 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA14539 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:47:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512222247.RAA14539@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?obbA27v9u/231qOsu7vK1rv6s+TWtaG3u+62r6Oh?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:49:02 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 ��ۻ��֣��ֻ��ֵ���� ۻ��֣��ֻ��ֵ���� http://bbs.51oyea.com

Ϊ��л��ѳ��Ա�վ��֧�֣�ŷҰ��̳��ԭ�еĻ��¼��Ըİ棬��һ��һ�ȵ�ʥ��ڵ��֮�ʣ��˾��Ƴ��̳��ۻ��֣��ֻ��ֵ���� ��ʼʱ�䣺2005��12��1��2006��1��28�գ��ǰ�ۻ��Ļ��Ϊ��Ч��֣�

�ϸ�򣺷��ŷҰ��̳��ÿ�ۻ��5000�֣��Ϳɻ��ɼ�ֵ20Ԫ��ֻ��ֵ��(�ƶ��ͨ��)��ֻҪ��ύ�һ��Ϣ��ŷҰ��д��ֻ��棬�Զ�Ϊ��ֵ��ȷ��ֻ��ȷ�ԣ�� ȡ��ǰ��һ��Ļ��ֽ��ա��磺��8000��֣�ѡ��ȡ5000��ֺ󣬵�ǰʣ�µĻ��Ϊ3000��5000��ֽ��գ�ʣ�µ�3000��ֿɼ��ۻ�� Ҳ��ۻ��ֵ�һ��ȡ��ֵ��á�

��ϵ��ʽ��0571-87797916��С�� QQ��1283511��460560908 ����ս��Ȩ�麼��ŷҰ��Ƽ��޹�˾��

��ŷҰ��Ƽ��޹�˾ http://bbs.51oyea.com From Tioxa@optonline.com Thu Dec 22 20:35:40 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpbqN-0005Eo-V5; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:35:39 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA07918; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:34:33 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512230134.UAA07918@ietf.org> Received: from [60.170.7.148] (helo=lh) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EpbtI-0004ls-84; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 20:38:42 -0500 From: "Tammy Manley" To: isis-update@ietf.org Subject: Re: That idea... Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:38:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_SZILOFFN.AFFOAABX" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_SZILOFFN.AFFOAABX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your existant homeloan certifies you for sizable gains. Our service will match you with the most expert company, so that you will have more wealth in your account at the end of each month. Its really not complex.. Myriads of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their dwellings every day. Now its your chance. This simple 1 minute form will be your next stage towards concrete fiscal security. With kindest regards, Tammy Manley Should you prefer not to get hold of this prospect any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_SZILOFFN.AFFOAABX Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your existant homeloan certifies you for sizable gains.

Our service will match you with the most expert company, so that you will have more wealth in your account at the end of each month.

Its really not complex..

Myriads of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their dwellings every day.

Now its your chance.

This simple 1 minute form will be your next stage towards concrete monetary security.

With kindest regards,

Tammy Manley

Should you prefer not to get hold of this prospect any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_SZILOFFN.AFFOAABX-- From aa@ss.com Thu Dec 22 22:18:31 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpdRu-0000mB-TX for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:18:30 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA15624 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:17:24 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512230317.WAA15624@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?obbA27v9u/231qOsu7vK1rv6s+TWtaG3u+62r6Oh?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:18:28 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] ��ۻ��֣��ֻ��ֵ���� ۻ��֣��ֻ��ֵ���� http://bbs.51oyea.com

��ϵ��ʽ��0571-87797916��С�� QQ��1283511��460560908 ����ս��Ȩ�麼��ŷҰ��Ƽ��޹�˾��

��ŷҰ��Ƽ��޹�˾ http://bbs.51oyea.com From aa@ss.com Fri Dec 23 04:07:03 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpitD-0007NY-2F for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:07:03 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA15295 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:05:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512230905.EAA15295@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+KOod3d3LnllMi5uZXQptc2829X7zOXXqsjD?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:06:58 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�ã�ת�üۣ�2.5��

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-87797916��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407��1283511

From aa@ss.com Fri Dec 23 07:51:22 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EpmOI-0002zU-ND for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:51:22 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.28.241]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA06678 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:50:15 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512231250.HAA06678@ietf.org> From: "aa"

Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$550.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$480.05 ( 87%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT downloa! d!

Sales Rank: #1
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 47 reviews)

Microsoft Windows XP Professional
by Microsoft

ListPrice:		$200.00
OurPrice:		$49.95
YouSave:		$150.05 ( 75%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #2
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 32 r! eviews)

Adobe Photoshop CS2 V 9.0
by Adobe

ListPrice:		$599.00
OurPrice:		$69.95
YouSave:		$529.05 ( 88%)

Availability: Available for INSTANT download!

Sales Rank: #3
Average Customer Review: 3D"5
(based on 37 reviews)

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C6087B.3DF36A00-- From feliciano@flsindustries.com Sat Dec 24 05:01:49 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Eq6Dj-0002Xc-VW; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:01:49 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA28629; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from s0106000bdb2e79ff.no.shawcable.net ([70.66.1.78]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eq6Gs-0000Yh-Nx; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:05:04 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (82.52.42.109 [82.52.42.109]) by 132.151.6.1 with ESMTP id e70si12[7]qbe.2005.96.19.08.47.09; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:58 -0600 Message-ID: <504i787m.2457998@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:00:58 -0600 From: "Tomas Snyder" X-PGP-Key: NhxjO9JwxPzvyVvqghoTffCL7XoDwzRQ3SEZZ2tdLUjTvLoBnnAhnwVmr4tSwwQJ== X-Mime-Key: Base64 (Nt7RpVtD94eUPRaJb0rTiBwEcR8S) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ing-admin@ietf.org Cc: internet-drafts@ietf.org, internev-drafts@ietf.org, ipcdn@ietf.org, ipcdn-admin@ietf.org, ipcdn-archive@ietf.org, ipngwg-archive@ietf.org, ipo-archive@ietf.org, iporpr@ietf.org X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: apache set sender to feliciano@flsindustries.com using -f Subject: Your account #664714 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------JavaMail.133798661747" X-Spam-Score: 4.7 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 6ba8aaf827dcb437101951262f69b3de This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------JavaMail.133798661747 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

not efficacy see howl it's aqua see engle may flog see cherub ! goleta on alum not coaxial in anselmo be neck try wong on transcontinental may lobular Or maybe not

--------------JavaMail.133798661747 Content-Type: image/gif; name="giant.4.gif" Content-ID: <3.0.0.00.0.61215405722315.93830396@affirmative.hotmail.com.8> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="giant.4.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhTAJyAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZmZlm/2Zm/2Zm ZmYz/zMz/zMzMzMA/wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAABMAnIAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8Tq/b7/i8fs/v+/+AgYKDhIWG h4iJiouIAQKPjwEAjpKPJQKSAJCbIpuRKpgpAgMEBAOZnQKXl6gknq2uJp6hjq8yqiehl6Sm uCO1kJnAkLulA76yKgG8BLojs8gtjqAoAqW4w5+rJZTFvSTZuM6dvMfgs7CM6tUFpdeTBZID 8SPzme3upiL4pQUFAykKRBMRgMC/UQYBipjnil4ngSf4JZTlcIQ7fKoESCSQbkWAiiSagTPY jFQ7VBov/3LU1M/dL5IIT5r4OHBhu2Pz/pHYqPCFxhQ0TcwzSWBSvlLpdIKrWLBdzJUsSZba 58vaQaKZUubruK7rw5kOp8LzBdFE2UnzikYc+BHqQ7UafU20ieJs3BJzLxVoeONjz2dnAbx7 JlbTXotqqS51yxIkgLQn5iFr2jPwrcOR25lVSApVYbOBP3oWSTix4hFl27ZK+dWra1CYfzm8 +9nyacA1bX/GvU9h28S7USMLnDI2YL42NDrOaw+swp/HhYc0/WtgO8t3k0mvAT2iwWhKTQRH jVR2pubcwgMIXHa8ru6v4yNfOhr97Z0Dx1sOekKsWMkQ8WeWLwIKxpFt8ME3Q/9Kf2ll0V8k MGTYdPjJVlMu8ew23oDJGQdYQdRJ1h91O/Fingj6ZFahdAViKN+LgOWjimgvqbfeUQrZJmEJ 2HlYz2EaSaKPPkHW1cwomlloIEUNHcVVCtdUZIxaLX5oGCTfrTihC1MViRqERuYD5goKImYY LJDhRaJwIBJET5UPocJeRj7q5SSMXsUVDDytZLnTkcSsN1CZguolymE03WUPKQFJFY2E2UX3 kC0wTJVikNDReAKNxZkCi13GZcPben9ht8k9gFoCA6HZ2WgYYxsW6heftG5a0ZxbwkYpnuqU qemr1NlWaAk7ahknCoyiOECyNKW4log8+iMtdQnWWVr/eTwCVGSXbwp75pn6VQUSiP1YJK20 IUHITFneEiQjk+Kd68+mn8VaVlw0wvntfRB5eSiv8vnqkF+zbsdjfmvu562zJvXUz4WFYjtp ABTbl+vFm57KIal3abqhWD9pBOZZBYtH5T8UO3KWxaO2O4nGhqZ3CsWRLiXXmrcNFRbOtQ03 o8sYA7yOwJmAfGtujwqrG2M2oeSP046tWC91zl5M6Av8pXWyOAjeC6RlgUHbEC7JmunmmoUB TaaHZaMIV6k3B4SMQbN17bPUTD/GtdCvEX2l2cMe/MtQddU0mFGhJUmeCqkpVfNjFVVrg6Yf nXVWXpAn1p3EgaNIXJIlTxoj/ypNkQVxCwqG/rfITQO+sbmeqZemwcOCSGCaV/OdCNFtypaj vGrJ61RA8obEz/B4PTqmwbSRKGC18j7pYj2mfZZTP+rB17NQ/lzUk7+uW6XScMDHoJy0j0T9 Hz7q2RtNQa1cT/fId7t7fHjnSyu97oBQvClBMxFGylJGkAHuz4CwGAYK0uE/oLTCfw3kBuke iMAYRBCAv0ggzDIIDgpmbE8cDOBMOCFBA1oQgRcM4cvGMYknpXASIwShBDvIDRJm0IT8y6EO d8jDHvrwh0AMohCHSMQiGvGISEyiEpfIxCY68YlQTIICFBBFIx5AAQcgwRWzqAMIUHEJCoBA FU1wAP8IcLEECpCABL5YhAM0QI1sRGMcFdAACDTgjACgox3xWAI32jGOfvQiGiFgxxQIEgsQ WKMIGtCAERySB4mUgBsl0EgdlJGPeRQjFBh5AwloUgSJ5IEiwSiBMfZRkiegJBaNcABPRvKT I2glG9/oxURykZZvRKUJ0ljLUbaSkomsJACCSUsUjPIKifwiIUdwTEuuEYtvFCYOWonJNEZh mTZI4xe1Kco4IsGapoylLkvQTCLUcZhelCYofUlJR4qxlcL05AmwOUxUvpGL3OQmAOCZSm9m gZ7lnOY4e0DNXZYSCvSsQSgBIE8S6LEBc8TjFPv5UD4+FIurnKhDvxhIiKL/wJph3GMf6/jH kRLyjrHE6ElRsMWLpjSk+CTkI1lK0jtqdIodPeMVMylSEVwRpiJwaVC9qVGezjSodYRoQdHo yVUG9aRnnGIY1TmCkN5xpyZYZkKrCsegjhOkXx3oPo8pS4ZKs50JfWM/Y0lSfwaSiqts6UpX gFWfzpGKO70iIVf5zKRi0qFQrStbVXmALW6xqmzUY0+rmlQsijWPB0VqSffp1KBudJdTLORT 95jXkFY2pEdNATzvSYJE9vKTzdyqCNRIyVye0bR09KQ9IztWvKoRosE8QRpvG8Z2+pS3ufWq HevIztsWk4yyxW1Dd8vJekL0uLo17ivX6UlGdhWy/8HsbSWZW0nYmtarePRtdqFbz3SyFpOm FeQvldtd3iJXlaalLVdlitxk+hSPaj2nOIk6UEqWdQRq9S14TTBKWsZ2nAampSJ/2dqGivaY av0tXEtZRjWakaHGVeNf19vbhWoxvYVFJTZJC4AEa9iRTc3lY8FZ3g6vVphpPKOAUazKscJX tvt8JRfH6+AV7DaOb0ysb1MLS2ays5JB5ioq/4tOUF7Yq/7c7RmTjM6oLnjGpP0lPgP6SyE3 Mo3CJPFYi/xbWH63vKVFpZQBrEgws9nLTuZqFsXcSk1SGbKPZSgbbfnmevpznVNW40ctzEdb BnSsjdxqOVns5KV6Vc9afP9smwVcZ68Ks8s23vKfS4vaAh+UxQA98jwRLGjkcrGg8NSnPte5 yGOumamthjOJgxvjrB6Tz62OLD3p3GMVKFqdESZyKs2syRmXWJcLLas2C8ts1a46zstmdhnF GGRp85OfzHSrsdVa6xdbW8xs5mNDPfzbL5dzmd02awki3O2G+lfapN12nkf57CaT26Hnlm8J IilkKh56oYrm777NOFBrNtPR2W4yvqm4VW5ie7Wb5uqEselbUKOW2Ab15r1/e2pd7vaThLQ2 N+VdzYPKG9FjPqhq6ynxfesatVdlNrgNCUuEjzWLwiZwHJdp86WWdaG7Za3QDUr0oAtd0JE8 ujz/Ec5lsVKTxQxWeiC1SmZsqhbd+garOPm4VHnWOupHDzHX573NrJdy5ZAlOs3tW2lIu3zH RV60fENe8FIeXNL+9qciA3rl8EacmYn2oiS7bfGEu1Pt+D6Bz8d54tUqHY49XzGFnT7bYy/7 359k9KPjbOPH/zWrNZc7zndOZrfHmckDbjS99T1oE3Cb9ZxXfH+1zd8rRhb1G5Wqwjkd+8Nr /thplzBTtzxt4cu+9msNPgnUivbfRxgFy0SrK9Ob5kBHGvmAR71WpZnuhBsb0t/vOwkOve41 rhGe9Cw8xHkP6/LLvuNbdvD3jS9nouO+1tpEqx1hn359Px+buAcDilZk/wAnTZpFTqS3WkXG ax6GegFYb+3kgJMmURfGdNqmTqHEaMZ2aN3XdrgmfBBobuNHgLQlWzKmTqPUazO3frVFToHH UvmmeHEWclI1RU3VZ/XXamPXbwwFS+30fLs3flQEhJA1Z/LlcLPHAr9kZ9elfACVgKekcay3 eFmUagVGgMW2gJKngC5HY1nEXND3SbjnYQCFgn/HflwVZp6macnHeW6Wa3gUXID2W5LnS7iG a1qmgFumSRb4Xmo4YQvnU/aVSrq0hNTVcZ92XRX2hbT1hpa3fD2mTxVWdmpIdijGUXyGdn4m iKWGb4FXb6Z3Z8zEhw1VRu1VhUC3higHWX92Zf9PxktlFn+25XdP9XmD+EuJF3s553KY2ImR Bn8Kl2UCFk2WxmZbCFl/OF9GZotmZoed2H+9uE2hdXjlJ1szll7zZ3q7l0uRBG7dV16R9Fdg 5kpNCI6NZ2OE5GB9eEqvdFubx2bpSH45Ro70hU7Y+IqyFY9lV43dGIXlp4+QaI0rqI3YOEqa aI445npHV3qeJnV4dmZ4RofhiGL8Bo9yiIBeRY/4Ro5Jto6ayGgH6ISoBYW2Fo8bd3McJ2bY 9HHuaIzdeIzHJpAYuUil13sISYawREsVuU41uU8bJlXVpHsshUeFpUVAuU9kpFtCqXhVuJS5 92c12Ed9hEnU9FOVVZT/fXSUPqZ7WIluTmlNVqlFVKmVUklGZPlScTWUcoRTsfR5aOmTLOVZ aumT1qZTTplHd1VZQ6WXlFVUZGSXd7mXVXhqU9mCoqVFhXlfbSmWosWVn0eUcLmYdsWWWcmW G0aUZ+lTZcmUZjlRWBmZaImZbqlDNlcEHwl7hHCQf+BG4dSav6gEp8kIqumatBkIoxkEn/mX tbmbvNmbvvmbwBmcwjmcxFmcxnmcyJmcjSBDM7AMR+CcBaMqoBAofbE8TGAV3rIrR3AKBGGd OeCcFrEDfqkErGkFUjaQMzCeVQBL6klQVOUCRdWernAkVWNBOPMDBbEQ4nA6VIEk+8MC+SkF /9YgCQVhOMcQE/zZA1ARoEDAoOshnmc4BGWETNv0njQgn1LQiBF6AxOanol1htKZNy7goENA opqQoJgxCn1xn0pgDu7SHw9EGkWwoCyKAw5qLTKAoW3Uk07wZD2go1CgoRLKoyoQnyAqFw9E CtyJDAgxMzizDMYgQNaADeUAC01KMXBRCYdTFy9xCe/QQBlBCgSiORnhCBxxQdOgCRXzDcXg omn6DAQaIWPCNL8CpS46n54yn9+jCWL6DOTQDBrEEtwJpe+jpGXKp4CqMs7QpARiphBTVH7k UZaFmCk1lWHEUY2VR19YR58FVYAVcRWVV3qFqZ66S39UWHDFRnX1Vv+mKkjqWZR+hUaxqluZ hFK1alF7BZe2l1G56lM1dWrQxH2Q6VA5VqveFKlfuFnbdKStsRCAOqWYcQ0q0zaEMTMiYg0z Aw/W6hbSKjJqsRLWIKNciiIEgjJ2igv/cAzL4Btw8a1HcqIjoSzPOjWYEK77gBdeyjPp4KL4 Yq8PUq+kUaDW0BvquizFwEK2ozIFCqW44Qi8UAliSjMCcR7z+hye8iQ3dX4htUiqSluSWlWc xYpXRFKb6kU7plSXWosfy2kqdU5TVZTwVFh1VE2n2qFPho8YpV+IJrM1JqsmG0av9bOH1lq7 KrTidFWZuqtf2Ksx60eoaLIOZYBR1UjTZlP/EPazgqesQ0UmF1EVVHMYBisbzsMY06A9MboQ f9EWKJIVKNoSIcGk7FIqL1o2hSGdRuE58cMZEBIKd6qi7iKueJEOA/srj8EZ0QCu4CG33LAm AtIZqOEm8TMwppGiIUInLOCZA8VJHfqIxdp+KBlugghgGpdFPup60lRpIEmUpfdkHRpGJVZJ rTRIoDRHAZVudLRIpytpMAZhykS7bCSkoKS6n0tOWyZMFehqmuS6aYZYzAsKM5MddHoYHjKw xHIhfssSCGQO0/utbMsC8eCw7SoU6NonBGoKfyGjdhuggPug7EsvqOEZ/Jk3+Xmnj7seCKSi hAsSdMq4sXG9giEP/9YhDJNrEZgwQAPrvx81hHo3uxBnZ1EWZnp3aqhVl7ervKlkqnkEY2b0 bf7Eup9EUgAWc82mV673wB+2WrtEVeMUu8xrwaLLTJeVSXWpVDV5u8METsrLwjA8TGPXvHhJ JuV6r2Zxt4srHlwhneF6FIA6tmubCt4rp/B6CegauPBANSgxGdxrxCYaIWG6E/VgOIILEHlz phthDA9RGVQcrzNhGna7EmMswF68D0rcJQk6UaUbvBmcxxe2YnuGXhJcZjIlU0jGZWQ2ofEZ yIHcwX9Mf4gcyD+FWZAcS+9UyGRGW5v7w+pZVMALWoiMRTUZuxPqUZJ6yQyFwgTmw0Daxv+S 4CN7YaLU+7bVUBXL48pZHMWME68IrDdCbBHlG7ZN7MRdKhj5gaXKUBSMIabFEhL7qgr0u7Zb PBI5ksbBXMTPMDcAbMQvWr/tKwt1rMBZxUWSdGF0ZMNy9ML7tsikTEZHlc6uG58W+s2hC0rP t7JRW8KRHLrsrMIn3MJU9bGbbKHpLLoedUliGHemTE6ozKy8rMvIwTTUyhKxPM3d+cvU88t2 O67kAA/iMcXKfLd0ixINohD1qb7SYwrOc9EdjRyvnM1MQyLSK83ZTM3A3MQrXSs3+sXEUgnd nEl99ME660nimFhF5nMgV2iye87rJkaQOtTv6cFIlcdQzbw67Ej/UQZImnTHoWXJ7GlbWfW7 MUzKrBnQT/VyqmrQJSZwW+sTVOoboPI1qDA76RIhRWG3vswf/pImUIHEuWElj0Gj7ELFAUq9 jCG5RRMeds0UkSMszZzSLyMlPWHXNPoc2Wwc++u+1ZzSzlI5cKzN8FPRtlxiQSnP+zXaNJnA pXVpjbe5QCuI2/XUwwePPxzCpI3UxarDh/RI3TaznFjV+5xuOjt++5zWuj2PXu3DzdWCYi3a qde5O8xku5XQayMtaesklNsPx4AzWuM4SfMweJoQgt29FL0T07Ia7BMolF2+hPG/i+Enwqw1 4prEW7rFqmM808KdEVLeTcIc18HRC63G/zL92W7h3p1NxLtsFG4701Nt3OToTae7aeOpk2bk 1PMlh46sWzIFX7FtkeTn1KV7sxU+4c/E25IM4haq1TGMXcmkySd+bOmIiUWKX8F90NMmUzpc VMdNAwS0Kf9ZQNLAFS+0QDXqQPgJCwvq4y+02Bg0OT/eQiLEBEvuEU8OpPd1mzSQmypg5aA5 l0pI5TDAbFpe5VheA2HeAmMOBF5+CE8+BSIqDTjKN1yunHBOBmvOAkge53Z+53ie53q+53ze 537+54Ae6II+6IRe6IZ+6Iie6Iq+6Ize6I7+6JAe6ZI+6ZRe6ZZ+6Zie6Zq+6Zze6Z7+6aAe 6qI+6qRe6qZ+6v+onuqqvuqs3uqu/uqwHuuyPuu0Xuu2rucGsAAOsOsJYAAk0OslYADAPgLC vusOsAC+PgIJkAC/zuwmMOzKnuzLPu3LLgLUngAIQALCfu3JruzX7uwiUOy83u0pIO7HTu4A 8O3M/u3oXgLgXu7tXu3angDGDu0qkAAMsOvI7u7Tnu2/ju7CTu7mvu8o8O7W/u0AEPDzXu/o bvAJb+/Pnu8OwAAGL+zzDvC6PvHvvu3UfvDXPuoMEAEPsAD4HgERAO4nH+wR0O0JYPIUH/IR wAAjsOvhbvLtDgApTwI57wARYOw0DwA8v+sPIPLK3vM+j+66PvQPcOxFH/Mln/MF7/L/T+8A 3R70Pg/0DjD0vF7uUB/16P7z1i71MO/w2i72Qy/zM9/zSq/zFb/yTf/yJk/1JmAAXQ8ASS/y TE/3LC/2Jv/uEbAAKn/zCa/0C7AASr/3ZU/uIT/y9G7z1r7reO8AIhD5+i7qPL/xQ+/sda/3 YY/2IxDyaE/zdO/2J1D3Oy/5JgD2dI/2Ld8CnF/0ni8CIU/26R7z5L4ARC8CYO/uEcACi78C Lf8AJQD2LR/7ADD7KED3D0DuLY/6WB/2KN/20m77JID7wl8Cvz/3pJ/wpF/82A/1fZ/4KDD0 /i4CCGDyRS/+st/1BjD05N71dR/qLU/20R/43G/81j7zVC/y/4IPAkCUAGU5lo5jsmq7AknE 0qwRGeYN0w5e72oARC7Fo8mEtMgjglCWZBHGqxSs+Yq0plBGArhOX9HY+rvSiDWmE/gz59Ct d6SuvWlZjLdtGp3pvHkJMbGgmBxCKS4yNjo+QkZKTlJWWmI9MCbCxfApOTRlKm6SGQmFnVB1 NuKZyOQFlv3Bnh6xJCm+RtgijSSGvQrdyAIMKz3AhC20idG0Bjfq8rZyQjsfRixwca6p1uz9 9RUxiNZYb5Jeqq+zt7u/wytla8q2gjL6lEPtJvT3H/pQITDFg37LBO0S6IBWMT73jvF6uCig QleAoCDrxDDcsi9hJNbI2AvKshS7mv8cIWVP36KM1rg1zAFyC4wRN0RR6/NECIIfuLjNkzcG HTKBC+IhTap0KdNJ6dbU+4EKig9PhIoKBFjQn8c6uxZo8cKVYc6pPSLaMsDV41Z/FnMx86ME 1x6ZyXiZMLtqLiBQ/Zp4Uyk17VqLO+UGujOYak0SN6jkTKzk2cWYzYQiKsOPa9POnj+DXod4 X9Qc5PA9aLLxcmZTWBz09BaOUc7Tx2SXAHcr612+ipp4rQPlZ2owMGwLeYBboxLdqPYcLg1A tyveJoAHv6bYNEsWyi97iWymjIOjzH9aFrF8fOv2od/Djy/fBHXS2pkrUnHDqiFZAPG60NEt lUGR00uxmPP/lAjm6TWbMNkYEOEgXVx0EzD8NUSMMYSoMhU20k24hnk3gCXhJjlRRtaHJiyz DEO7DEiCDw6mV9+AWqBDzHw78tjjOo8BwUARgg3Z3XRFuHCTff25dpZJYRE4mSeFhBRlCap9 80aDewlh40xvBQLjCUZugwV/dTW5IZFXnvmGl/qgSAeZF21SFUMhTjfFIdZAA+Q1KWmmo4+D ElooSVNASYd0QzBxRxMewaAkIf5BWgsi5aBXoCc3OYphQ5vsYZ5xvj2IG55gWsQDpzpgKU8i BvgwRhgGtLrmp2WEaoapr/JBzapWtFqKd576ICoAgAUSKZV/LGQRgTkaGq2003bC/0RVD+AY 3Aw5IRAKKHXIquqyTJJbVXaj6vqHtirCQqu1oaxWDHAqgDuHtqj2QotII9HAwBHuIgPvRHV8 W6e2O4lwL4rzVjXGgceKux2r7zZKrmRKHERvHfpIYWcv1hIMlSHa4kWtySc3hYA/7UbYshVA +IOwFXlEKAzLM7dcczE0F5Gzy5NNtrIjarnljM93bKSz0TYLA3M/8doQMxA5G011MU73s/TU NjiDNS1K67AI0VlLakXRPAm9tQ5Ho9y222/DHbfcc9Ndt910H5233nvz3bfffwMeuOCDE164 4YcjnrjiizPeeN53Q163QpNTXrnll2Oeueabc96555+DHly66KOTXrrpp6Nu+nqRs96666/D Hrvss9Neu+2345677rvz3rvvvwMfvPoCep+88ccjn7zyU3CSvWPGJx+99NNTX73112Ofvfbb c9+999+DH77445Nxehzdo59+CAA7 --------------JavaMail.133798661747-- From Lhjoyyu@optonline.com Sat Dec 24 11:34:38 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqCLu-0004QX-50; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:34:38 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA04486; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:33:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EqCP9-00037g-Kv; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:38:00 -0500 Received: from p8b9423.tokynt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp ([210.139.148.35] helo=lh) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EqCLq-0005fR-9i; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:34:35 -0500 From: "Mathew Collier" To: saad@ietf.org Subject: Re: That idea... Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:36:04 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_MAZRMLUO.KPNJLDKI" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_MAZRMLUO.KPNJLDKI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sir/Madam, Your current homeloan qualifies you to get sizable benefits. Our database will match you with the most experienced company, so that you will have more cash in your balance at the end of each month. It really is that smooth.. Tons of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their abodes every day. Now its your period. This short 1 minute form will be your next move towards final monetary security. With sincerest regards, Mathew Collier Should you choose not to get this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_MAZRMLUO.KPNJLDKI Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sir/Madam,

Your current homeloan qualifies you to get sizable benefits.

Our database will match you with the most experienced company, so that you will have more cash in your balance at the end of each month.

It really is that smooth..

Tons of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their abodes every day.

Now its your period.

This short 1 minute form will be your next move towards final financial security.

With sincerest regards,

Mathew Collier

Should you choose not to get this offer any further say no more. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_MAZRMLUO.KPNJLDKI-- From aa@ss.com Sat Dec 24 15:06:07 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqFeZ-0000h4-2r for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:06:07 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.229.161]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA21638 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:04:58 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512242004.PAA21638@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+KOod3d3LnllMi5uZXQptc2829X7zOXXqsjD?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:06:04 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�ã�ת�üۣ�2.5��

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-87797916��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407��1283511

From aa@ss.com Sat Dec 24 17:35:00 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqHye-0004cJ-1G for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:35:00 -0500 Received: from ss.com ([220.184.229.161]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA02110 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 17:33:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200512242233.RAA02110@ietf.org> From: "aa" Subject: =?GB2312?B?urzW3bb+ytbN+KOod3d3LnllMi5uZXQptc2829X7zOXXqsjD?= To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: saas@ss.com Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 06:34:57 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�� ݶ��ͼ�ת�� http://www.ye2.net

��ݶ��Ǻ��ݵ��רҵ�Ķ��ֽ��ƽ̨��кܺõķ�չ��ƣ�
��ʽ𡢾��ޣ��ֽ��ݶ��ͼ�ת�ã�ת�üۣ�2.5��

��ϵ��
�绰�� 0571-87797916��13516877179
��ϵ�ˣ� ��
��QQ:114103407��1283511

From cleveland@anytimeaccess.com Sat Dec 24 20:29:16 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqKhI-0002D5-4U; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:29:16 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14713; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:28:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EqKkb-0000XX-Uy; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:32:43 -0500 Received: from pool-162-84-236-177.ny5030.east.verizon.net ([162.84.236.177]) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1EqKhA-0008Q0-EM; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:29:08 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.8] ([162.84.236.177]) by yahoo.com (Sendmail 8.7.6) with ESMTP (SSL) id IYT83124 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:28:57 -0600 Message-ID: <038r496s.5997047@yahoo.com> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=cuddly; d=yahoo.com; b=vMkRk0yEgYJXsD7Agfc7RRyRIoSsaACiLh3neLaGt8G07KupSLpFEP1PesHCKHVumkzrwlhbG98RiNAH; X-Display: Full X-List: oppressive.usenet Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:28:57 -0600 From: "Ariel Davison" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ipngwg-archive@ietf.org Subject: Pre-approved Application #MBTIBCJ43391 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------AttPart_46934437==.OLA" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Scan-Signature: ee80a2074afbfe28d15369f4e74e579d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------AttPart_46934437==.OLA Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

be congress it pacifist a samuelson , diagram try weekend , prototype in edgar ! demonstrate ! ankle ! exemplary it's compulsive but carnegie on trustworthy and coupon Or maybe not

--------------AttPart_46934437==.OLA Content-Type: image/gif; name="mph.2.gif" Content-ID: <8.0.0.07.0.67025221284919.47530614@coronary.hotmail.com.2> Content-Disposition: inline; filename="mph.2.gif" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 R0lGODlhtgHYAMQAAP/////MzP+Zmf9mZv8zM/8AAMzM/8zMzMyZ/5mZ/5mZzJmZmZlmzGZm zGZmZmYzzDMzMzMAzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ACH5BAAAAAAALAAAAAC2AdgAAAX/ICCOZGmeaKqubOu+cCzPdG3feK7vfO//wKBwSCwaj8ik cslsOp/QqHRKrVqv2Kx2y+16v+CweEwum8/otHrNbrvf8Lh8Tq/b7/gf5ECCLFQLEAB+eYWG h1V7fX8pgYOMiJGSk0OKI4SNgpiUnJ2eM5YimAcQEhKWjpiBpqGfrq+cpaazfwcSDiILEnyp f7qMDruww8SGrYQQuCOOvQASkAAOysXU1XDHf7KzpgC9tnzLgtbj5GjYjyfNzyTS5e7vYOe/ IqS+mr7r0cLo8P3+UucAkKKV616uWZZs/VvIkI0DaA0jSpxIsaLFixgzatzIsaPHjyBDihxJ suQ4XSRu/41o52ITvXwuFkzz4TKGo0Ezy9wkoevAzioscdQUsu+GA3Epiu74CWSfLqRDU9S0 BXGFzCBRY4pLloZpt11epQS9kfWH0hpHV5zNEbYHJmn71kqtKuMqkLIs2upEakLvk7E28PaQ axYcD786WO4ihJKerFYCEdoKFgycLlaGL5sCLCIYZnqeYT6bhcsWq4Okp4VWpK1eNwiPDa92 +ZPQgdCMFK7M+TX1t5eQwML+rPDmQFN0j99CuupUWoGPk2urHG048hG3CUZm58D0Ke4p+RxX xdfPZJUjnMaONg32bp6CAq3XrCy0skDB8H3Wt661EJSkdIPLc5MdZNgltVwnzP881R3ESCm8 wQbOcxJCp8x1rvHDIISiWPLcTYydwos4R4l33SIvdSgeV7p1ltOGKr2FHjMiNljcVuJkiN2M 33314HcF+lgCKTmawkcwOXI1iCKklCYBePzsGE5k961T2wKmQbRgPpW1aKQIML32lSI77VOi hb3xwqUg3wQo5hDftKOQkkoWZIJt+QgT5kPOHFinnSY89xIfMLGEiVJctQWiPeB809OOEN3U jqCRHdAieyUgistNo4nC6KA3NiglilM6A417fza2El+/URonq7tcamhVmCAzE0pXUmWCntC0 w5g0+JTATEJxqemnT3H1+keYiOnwjCV+5KPNNncmCE7/rNtI9iRPOXGGKYpFzbodt9/2tZU9 O/rEV5TpWSoMYOZt6yIJlwoIJpb36PYTtmKGts2x9LIpr50u/baSlkfmtAu8WA4srrDxnUuv cIsYHJ7FYvbiCJ/wvVkpmGpm+4xxIgNZocdCHCWvygiygOe1hB6Y3qndrtsZrDG/x4+moprr qceODqxrCcCSiLPFNfHMHp8ysbSvu/3yVgJt4iCqya0D9/yxqwsfXVStdPlRK9ZfXbwWr1B2 aupZw6YLctk+v41CY82yhd6Yy+SjY8sGv4vKlj/mROSEODp2oWzKyBg4dB6KsyjQwlSYpQmm GeYemksaSLS06FUOpnpmixkk/5HC8mg0OKUIXCVEthT5bo9Ndmi47F+hTtcqO65OpewYv80g dfrU12PHO/WNuodP7nRm7TQCCmeYd0On3dTWyq3ZJprdwlt2+ykXHOI/o7aZMtzX+CZjSBk8 W9isagPJeLdvE9TlmTvfZ6jSb3aCcoJezxL8+5uO39yHHQI6hhWQyEr0AHjAGvWuT+ILBYOG Rrz0FWslkkHZ9X6Uj7qZhAVhahke/pSFB37QHaOjX8fmQD/gbcFbJ0ThdGQWvjmshoZYIEwM d8jDHvrwh0AMohCHSMQixkEwT0BiXwqlw5bYDCtPhIIKYzDFFlRxIFE0wqOKsMUZdBELSmxC GDNVJP+pUTGLNEGjGNWogiq6zGZPocsRvvifJlrFjlKUI0D0CIj+4PGNR3CjFNkoFUJODY5/ rCMOf0BHGDTSWZqxlCwg0Rwm3eKSp3kNKwgkQMs8hpPT200pJEkabGXyeou8xCXfd0MwTYOO qZtFZrZRCiGJYlsbPIF19IfB/eRPNNqADH+Q0sr6eY8n8ouMLH85E39N8XqdyaA+Ujek6QAH g2PiRt4mlMEtMmgex7xljELZOiMppxTZIAj/cHCdp6jJQdF0l7QYASM2Xc5z9aTd3qbJuJfs QxVrWoFpyuMcWRDqlWf5pDYvAxdtwk4lDPUMrcbHoWk21ETaq2hqhveS4fz/AUkXzZxppFFR z5BUJSrrziAK2iOQemZdA+GTSSU6zAMNVGUCg0QwekOb12kPOUGipj7kedJNnWKUq1DpjoCa OpVZCUJ8aKpQa3A30RCqV92ByaFOJQiuXbUPXYUV0Yw2Mdvdix18HCoGEYqLu8GSR4QiFi79 SKh9kG5qWgXL8AqETlXWFRhZa103kGVBXKAqr+7iC5ZoR5m8LeApeUOkmizYVY7eMoHPoOBO 3Vk6wu5IE0/yTlxXillkDUhzE3sdZun5OoSmVS2GsSrGAoG0BEEsGgir18ZKdiCWcKxdP/MO Le8om6x9x60JZU5mmSUvEalEuP86JDIfWzLQimxZ/6rJ2kohWt3MTYsWDLoTiUr2EKstUU29 etJOxTuxhuk0eWvpSXj14aNfjMyP1z0Oa2U2tPXOTHP+Io0NikLgr+6mtnKTnVcheImumlFn C95ZKucWrqIUaHgupF1kGjaTWkZzlJFJhjRGLN5ZUlfEI07niEd8UGya674oBpZ3tbdiZMnx cpRZ8UPCe1dkorcP6tXuSqcbpCE3Ur5h8vBRNTGcW+pYqZcx1pC4ZOEOtlbHr1VBgYH7O2xZ DhjQAtJD/YY6MZNviv8bs1mrY5kt4bCLnB1IOhOkXfrpqqKyWGp7rByhGl0mxID9aOcudzf/ GugXrQt05hrbz5HCs35xBv8xhqa6TWXWgkOGxiCZvvQlyB7ZlJdGD00ZGs0zh1WtdBxanE/0 qEgnEgVbtl4GERzB/3Wy1mcWMNGmwb9/UhIh+02HUrLXuWzRyoKhzhY7LPzdiWarzbQsczKd kd3SLZPYrNlKtsh3XQ0H2JLZkqw/ERJNFDRbfJ2OrzCga8F1f0mcAvYXaiHVy20Emz/SzAIJ XfbgJdyGcizetVKFxcrMpHgmPukLidPRNM6kWFgB7wwltyeN3so4FxOvuMBvBY3baJw7wKrK bSz+W7ukY+HYQfnIAQ5yiJQ8UhEXEK+lNnCBHLxRCI85FVpoR55P2IhAt2G+VVDMoBv96EhP utL/l870pjudi69+utTb8MipW/3qWGe6QqgSSpTZxoDMjBySSJ31sgNh61/q3Si2dc+vuy6q KunPz81O9xig/cu3xRTXtPYbOhmy7oBvAdpJZbYj8fa3bxtFXwPPeBoMXoTckRTNccYuCjb+ 8oIP7cCG4rndNVrN6CCFu7JROGpj/vTbuVRUVLjOBl4yqoBFz+UI3W/U2556t889FTyo+95X Isu+D77wh0/84hv/+MgXAwxJYsKQ/GT5SIiKm24QdRyMh4bKPVFNKSeLV04yb+YLWAgZeTW5 6evvXtQ1T3LT/XBoP481ZAf6k8CxeolROjmoPllGXBO6bZr0UWUzJuMk//iAD4YnM6oyBKlw OCmCMj1gX15xKPZEgLYEf+yyKiUUOcBHBNI3f7A2dzzwDJxhGjVUIgQGDcWzMN5nKpfwIh5I A0xhV7j0glrxQPkBOR5XKhYYFZRiBYHwE5W0Zh+zOb5kHw04L4pHGjZTPt7UTepXb9xGKkb4 Gje4KvuWDEJWNFAyLzOzCd9QFECoTtHhIiBWQKVkeCGkMRuFHMaxHtynhLcEGeeBgLDxUTPx LO/DNvIjOKMhIpcRClO4NvrjHVfzGBioBWVoS9ThhclFODezIgIDHnhSJTZzOVGmiEixFmdy V2v3iGhyiZvTChWnXY7CF2PxJ9GShwmYgG8SJP/zgCTV9HZtsi7NwGDn53mpZjoZs4QVNSi2 sggwMVucw4eRUyE4xiSEtg4ZUis9oiQ96IN8sSeGlYcHEhZfFC+SmA0ouC6U8ih7wgh66Ce2 hQ7XiCyLlFKgUmfoojOi0GE8pjYHkXepol42s2DjJyaH0igziBMrBHkZo0Ot4yHTyI8IEoxK oTT0NoTFgSjLolOJ8yDMQVZakILVaBCDsoX96CKyMpAFsy4kZErhlmD28y3Y2BvGphejCHvj IkLP10x3+IPpAoa0KDHp4nAIwzh0KGENmAolMzU25TjhV1Zp8ThjgYduc4S5wIejsh1M0Q7h 8pA1pBvPWAX7glXlwor/U3mNDYN3v6iDN+NjDLYrCMiQBQFQ6ZBFviIT3RYlFsMsFpSDdqJV LtiOyFQuh3iR8dgx+biTFjkXGTmVpQhdp0CRQRGDfqKUR7iQ4hiWD8OIXxCGgPVjsRMwjeOJ nAiUKumKlqWZZIZamoiMBAVW3OSA0NE0PWEYLVITxpiJoxU7uqIrrcY2ZQRPI6hmzaOX4KiP djJB/aeLMsWNWdUki+kME7hhxrlsizMxSymVoJlgjZmHGoYFTIFK4Bc9KZdvgchASbgZvHiG EfQ9JxCISUmEfraERdeA3zVe5tOGvKRJMPGHNFQ8Y2iXZrgZkfN++JibfOl60gGHWCQzTmWd //xwHN6Hn+gGGC2SoCujfk8ZPo5ZPxthf2JRezAgTO/QfMknbOxHoUwAfSKBoRn6Yu0ZoiRa oiZ6oiiaoiq6oiw6AgRQADBKAAEgAwJQAERAAAQAADUqACJQAAPQRk9IRRtIEwhkAgEAo0hK ADxKBD7aoz/qA03qpOwEgjswRmeHTlMJA9MnBDg6AC+aozFQozeaozX6pFFqbgkypIRHf5tm pAVAAAPgpTD6pEIQpWfKA2d6pzSgf4Ghpj7QGFn6AlsaBDgqAoUapjY6BIUaAAMwowCgp7h3 gS9gpSHIWm66pAAQAC+KqUCgpFIKpXQKqTLApzVAqX9KgwFUBIVao/9gmqkvGqMF4Kg1mqSJ WgKamqQzyqow6qpIyqkDgKRvmqNHKgCzuqtoWjvVqT0bph1fl1WUwYhRVXTrZDHKczIkMKzX GqW3Oqck8KsxKqvfCgBfGq46GgDFWqsicKSvWgDE2qsjcK4vqqPAeq7puq5L+qtf+oHRxEvz Q0wuCWLrQ4gRxE3jxz+q81xuWJ2PtQdvUSW+ZLBTphnvM58usK7smq5zKqexKq8+6q3oirFv Gqcwaq4xKgBH2rEv+qT4KrJvmqnsyqghKxXk9mgc4jl9t7AYpY1us3jgNGgDMg3u9mDYSgKL GqNyCqYr660zOqct+6pwaqzpurK2iqQe+7T/GzurLGujMAunW/ujJxunKQsA3iqj+rqJ7uEl ybJsOLIi8/RoaTGLU0aJloaLsmknpei2s4k3qWUiJqI7FQun3sqjL+qot7q0ZOuyHyuuF5uu PMqqM7qpLhqrrPquLTu0oipChHaYQ4gOsIFsUSl2eik1t4isnDG0LpqjkGuo7Dq5GPujb2qu jxulNeqoIwCpJ5urLSuvPPq6IFu7ofqkqau4W6tl5ogiv8I0WfMhQgM2Z3UwLFgtHTM0qTKT gLIK16Is7MIUCDaPL3CoR/qjcJqtAWC68moCh1oCs6u6wAqj7Uq74iqsi3u5NbRcELeSnGtn vrazNvUkWYEM7xWU/xjLqY+Kuq3qsu26vi07q2B6vulLAra7uEM7rOQrpp/6qMCLwOz6q7DV lJtyDxvjcvfhkQ9CZyE5OD4ZMEP4XdpUKjuhJIL5HR05ZcbbcYl0vk1bwLP7vUSbuPFqAg2c snEaxCSLqZoKv0sqv1GyDjyjetpIMhOCUHQ5JftWEBKKAhPcpD0sAjvKqkEcp0t6q+Dbqg3s u5cawAGsw5FLxp8KxF0MsxtMlmtzL2fhNMs7wiJZOpFqt/kLCI5DIkehn3dyKzC1edlANn+r uj+Kr7i7sWGruImryLwqr476q09axD16sbdqxBWcUD8STYvDxOQoMG12aYlDZQlyZkBbE/+Z NgKmq7Riy7uzOr5veq8vW8sETLnua8FlbMBm3Mivqsa6/MqVXKga7I8QZLbEJGqWVS6Ss3hv 8TfqAjd5I7cGw5uR0sf20irQTLeDjCKauYEWe7gWO7K8ur4nMM5kurHqS7UgC6yaHMwRmG/Z IyeErCF7AIbqh4VF6nrNpF2r3M7ASrvjvKTn+rony77vi8sl8MBfDMGYPM61mqd0Os6JXKv2 ZyZPOEHjNxbrU0O5tF0iNx2iXJ/jdxO0FZEhM5gk3YOgnD9WKgBdjL5BDNO0C9NeTKe2KsRR 67423agl0MXEmqk+LbZLaqH3JwMeagJdPAACrKNBrNRe3K1MrcX/RDzUIzDVOU24Q82oNT3T dIrVRE0CPS2rdIp4LZoGlAqiZ416lMp7a/3WcB3Xcj3XdF3Xdj0FLeynLRB1qanXd30ReV0Y WiovpvrXgA0Vfg1bg23Mhu0PfRgr33eghiVLM0ud56Ea7eGvgng3EIsbktrY8NBOfjZXyRnY mDi3S/luSqyMrC23K1nYoO0KVQWeSmPa32h5P2OacFMoA1kqfR3bC3GC7aJbIcw31fVAGtNV gIyPP3mEsA3cnRBrEFTbiH3Hm5sSjTEaMCPF24iU0P0P0q1aTuY8z9xm7oJDjAaLCUYjru0l HPrdsBDe0DY+5P1rRWpCGg2egAKxKymg//D93wAe4AI+4ARe4AZ+4Aie4Aq+4Aze4A7+4BAe 4RI+4RRe4RZ+4Rie4Rq+4Rze4R7+4SAe4iI+4iRe4sT3ABGQ4iluACKQACie4g+QACrg4ioe 4yNgACqu4gmQ4xHwACkQASyOAgzA4wAw5DUe5EZe4wDw4jpeAgzAACXwAD4+AjSe4g0Q5EKe 4wyA5QBgAA1Q4zI+AjZOAhEA5QDw5T2O5BFA5lCO42EOADue41MuAjhOAjhO5GV+42je42++ 5H0OAHl+AlWe5jceAW++41g+6GN+5zm+5Dz+5y3O5GO+5HPe5YZO5ZL+5lLe4iluAg9g5iKw 6Y6e4wnA6FZO5/88DuR2ruqF/uZeDuZUHgEIMAKdLgJDzuK3zgIJwAAo/uS4DuO8nuKgXgJx /uloPuU4/ulPvuVP3uMMAOmcXulOXubLXuTUbuS/vuzPTunazuXW3ueiPupP/uLQzujjvuKc 7uxGPucozuV5vuMPgOa2vua03uaXTufN/ungfu+2PuTKDuhmXuzN3uNizuoiEOhRLuzBfu9u Hutq7uwvbub5/uTcvuzebu3OjuZmHu6WHubrzgAaH+o+7u8n8OkkIOpS3u3Jfu72ruy+vuoP gOUND+fAvu6obuYIgO6OPu8Xn+WxHvM3juKQDu8y3+sdbwIzjwIv3vPWPu0O3/RRLu3/087v ok7ysW7wBT/s8G7p/O7oDRDqOg/wNM/iBuDx9H7w9v7nSY/qtX7yc57nd77vXz/qWI7wI2D1 bE/2/I7oNA/0dC70Ys7uUk8CRB/0qs7xDV/4f3/4Uk7wJT/sKC/tSU/wa18Cdz7nDR/3Jx8B c+/4Rh7mnM/zLjDkBe/td+7pWG/rqA7plU/4ZW73JED6sX/27Q71bq8CSR7km57sJrDjcx/r w97ivw7ptf/ifv/ujn/3Zy/2lV/5Qz7kfx7ueQ79qM/ixh/ksA/oUo/jX5/0fF/7q077gq8C YU/nYY74l17+XX7+KQ7toQ75U87xR0/z3d/1lq/kR0/9Cc/i/18OAgAQNdEDIFEiMpEhwrHc wqQslm9s37ARAYOv36oHeESOrl4rmGwGTwAo8IR0FmGt3/JxSmV3Uu3SiOwlVMdHWhphsIC6 abIGJ8rwPtNoLPLaKaGpebWJvOWp3QDqAaS98Mjk/I1dBYX9NBhRxhBlbippblpG/TmpcDkN nZaJEJXcEdbJpK2kIbw+RSDEzYHSuSLebMkIxwn9PDAsM6yGxYAB/MANvzHTIbGRMTOseHH7 Aqc8GADW9gDGEJv5wUQDtpwYpynSBDYGhxHfxqSPwPmDRuhEvH+JnnFq9GgakzL+vjHzxXCU H0/G0AGhhk4Zs3QQlxlIllFHMnCdZP8lwBPQnZppNMCc6fWLTI12pm4AiZFgGZKQik4iNHWq 4QwXfGjKWFlURBtGF4O1O2emFRle6WBd5BJnR6xn+Fj58YeoZzWrUrBqDKaxZzJpPx/1wQjj oU0xoALiOcoOSdAjaT22I9IiC76DpgYrCUeHV590JPSum2kPQIlnhoqmdXuisNugJZdVrrY0 jcbJc+sipXNUjqSfUCUqc6Q3WJ2HGf0yXbKOYWGFJDq2Egvn8p7alW4nLZOMr1tRdF6E1qmX LqjoMODiVWM99wsvXBgn/StlpUrlrg27BWJrdvq56nEgd5QZ1GQu5KSVoOpemyPmnDkn1s8s qW1F2S4F9oP/GoJKSJGCMOWwFwd/CSBBTTY6NMGYPxDCoR6EL7QRkn/nNTLbJ5wcYqEJGAKh 4Rgc3uAgNU04995l9g2R3xzUbcJFAzmylt0KPgLZxWashZcginsMeRSA+RRXxIXHgNeEDvSA R9ZMwPhAyopGQHhKEakI0dkNE113nmlcBkgFH14+s6Y/9DihoJsXeflTdrEEsVadtF1ipmxx OjSGMXlmsecgrGhEZithRuGLbVic6eV9SvSpB6RV6JCOg+HEdppQl+hBWnqqACVdoqyEMU5x AvZ1w05nRjSTAdzMwE0zLCh2q2K76pTZrK7suhM3tugazrA+WFbrL7jSuoxlXo0p/y0t1mph 0hQkzecrU1l00wkz0+YRq7FwbOesuCDJmsW57PZwK7ZMHeutD+Pq5C6w14WRQBHv7rqvvywk O4OyEuE7TL/9zrelww9DHLHEE1NcscUXY5wxxOFq3LHHH4McMpghkVyyySejnLLKK7Pcsssv wxyzzDPTXLPNN+Ocs84789yzzb8oELTQQxNdtNFHI5200ksz3bTTT0MdtdRTU1211VdjnbXW W0+tmMhfgx222GOTXbbZZ6Odttprs92222/DHbfcc9Ndt91345233nvz3bfffwMeuOCDE164 4YcjnrjiizPeuOOPQx655JNTXrnll2Oeueabc96555+DHv+66KOTXrrpp6Oeuuqrs96666/D Hrvss9Neu+2345677rvz3rvvvwMfvPDDE1885BBIkLwDEkOwwA0OJJ88BGc3b7z1k1d/gATO Q1y9DA4sLwIE05ft/fXnN+69+Q6vLwL4MCxAPtnto1+/4dUvIMEBMECvPP/JL0B70vte+AAA gfAdAHkAhMEB+rc9/Ykgf9F7H/iQtz8Hjs95Eiyg/Tr4NwVKQH4OgMD+Erg87R0ggeLjXgwc GEIYjE8ECeReDAEgwf3lj4YSWB70yDfCEiLPedsz4P48aES+qW96+Sui+PY3RBiykH8OiF8L 5QcA7QFghDFYIgAgCEMeki9/MZj/oQGteMQz4s1825Ng9BaYQBKu8HnLO+D/2pg8E8pAf1jc Ig/DR8UYZC+IaByk3dS4ADFuApH0ex8K3cdB/lmRi14UXx9lOEkyWjKKhNxk29QnAfHBMYuf pKIiNZlFP5JPewiMoSojeEdR6rCS7oNjAreXwBQO8Y+c3CXaQBhKUUqviAqkoSnf50gZgrCA tVSeF9m4Q1m6L3oZBGb46MfLa1pujx8zIza76bgcIvOR3hzn6uI3QXKiM53qXCc72+nOd8Iz nvLkZANF1jztmTJiiBzjEx2my3nO04Ihu2c/KQY9TR4UYv8EKDxVKc6MWXNiIzTjAh+2UIa6 E3zaNOAI/wdYxxB6j42hrB4EH+g/ZE6QmwecIvzit8oJQvCAII1eIyPITYxes5HmQx756JhF Wi4QnD+NY0mHSMZW2vCFMjigLklIxzdaMqY7tOkxRTBJnHbTmNqsoQ2VeMkhFpSlJHUiC9+3 vouCFYfT06IWGRjTAv5xjxfFKi/t+ETzkdKMBLXr9MbaRSaalYlX5OYQzarBtWoypixsqvMi SldC/vOPePUqP4UoWCj+NbPHPKsZG4nCTyZ1qG7d32ThR0LQPhabVzVgYxfbU6AWNpRc9Osk 35c/PyrVrTD0KRa1lln3rhYGIcxnagd5USoGF5gg5Z5IiFfEnr5UeWbcJxevhMEAZe5QsaZt IWqL+9iCBs6Y3p0nUqGd5pqOl7zJvCzg5prBcCE3vvKdL33ra9/74mlpXt0vf/vr3/8COMAC zm8IAAA7 --------------AttPart_46934437==.OLA-- From ipv6-bounces@ietf.org Sun Dec 25 00:03:27 2005 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqO2Z-00029X-O5 for ipngwg-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:03:27 -0500 Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA29107 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:02:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqNzn-0001gR-Mj; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:00:35 -0500 Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EqNzl-0001gI-Fc for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:00:33 -0500 Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA28981 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:59:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net ([66.92.66.68]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EqO35-0005nB-2Q for ipv6@ietf.org; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:04:02 -0500 Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B94A5B for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:00:11 -0500 (EST) To: ipv6@ietf.org From: Rob Austein Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:00:11 -0500 Message-Id: <20051225050011.85B94A5B@cyteen.hactrn.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25 Subject: Weekly posting summary for ipv6@ietf.org X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group $ipv6$"