Subject: Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt

From: Bernard Aboba <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:01:09 -0700

The RADEXT WG has a charter deliverable for extensions to the RADIUS attribute space. The apparent consensus in the WG is to solve a very simple set of problems, including the pending exhaustion of the standard RADIUS attribute space, a consistent mechanism for application layer fragmentation and reassembly for Diameter interoperability, and a consistent mechanism for grouping of attributes for data structuring, also for Diameter interoperability. The structure of the extended attribute format currently under consideration may require changes in various RADIUS extensions drafts in RADEXT and other working groups. This assumes that at least some of these documents will ultimately use the RADIUS extended attribute allocations. Given thepotential widespread impact of attribute extension, the RADEXT WG Chairs are requesting that the RADEXT WG and all other affected WGs please review the following document: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt This is the third (and last) review request relating to this document.  On December 5, 2006 a call for review of the RADIUS extended attribute document was issued to the RADEXT WG:  http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2006/msg01002.htmlUnfortunately, no review comments were received relating to this document.  Since the call for review occurred during the holiday the call for review as reissued on March 20, 2007:http://ops.ietf.org/lists/radiusext/2007/msg00161.html This request did not garner much response either, so the call for review is beingreissued one last time, in order to gauge whether there is sufficient interest in this work item.  Please send comments to the RADEXT WG mailing list ([email-masked])
indicating whether you believe the document should be adopted as a RADEXT WG 
work item.  You need not have any comments on the document in order to respond 
affirmatively;  however, if you do not believe the document should be adopted, it would 
be helpful to explain why not.  If there are specific issues relating to the document,
these should be submitted using the RADEXT Issue Tracker template, which can be found at:http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/RADEXT/ This Request for Review will last until July 22, 2007. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf