Received: from hoffman.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q09MiAKF076680 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:44:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.13.5/Submit) id q09MiAMR076679; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:44:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org using -f Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.25]) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q09Mi9YK076674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:44:10 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from msk@cloudmark.com) Received: from spite.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.72) by EXCH-HTCAS901.corp.cloudmark.com (172.22.10.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:44:01 -0800 Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:44:08 -0800 From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" To: "ietf-822@imc.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:44:07 -0800 Subject: draft-kucherawy-received-state Thread-Topic: draft-kucherawy-received-state Thread-Index: AczPIDJCUo4D/2xQToydvWXCFVuKOA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C157BAEXCHC2corpclo_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-ietf-822@mail.imc.org Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-ID: List-Unsubscribe: --_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C157BAEXCHC2corpclo_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Over on ietf-smtp, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-receive= d-state/ was developed late last year. This is an optional tweak to Receiv= ed fields allowing annotation of entry into special states of mail handling= , such as quarantines or hold-for-moderation MLM actions that would help to= explain large gaps in timestamp sequences. I'm looking for a wider audience of reviewers and (hopefully supporters). = If this sort of thing seems like a good (or terrible) idea, please do follo= w up and comment. How much and what kind of support is evident will guide the choice of what = its next steps are (if any). Thanks, -MSK --_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C157BAEXCHC2corpclo_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

Over o= n ietf-smtp, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kucherawy-received-st= ate/ was developed late last year. This is an optional tweak to R= eceived fields allowing annotation of entry into special states of mail han= dling, such as quarantines or hold-for-moderation MLM actions that would he= lp to explain large gaps in timestamp sequences.

I’m looking for a = wider audience of reviewers and (hopefully supporters). If this sort = of thing seems like a good (or terrible) idea, please do follow up and comm= ent.

How much and what kind of support is evident will guide the choice o= f what its next steps are (if any).

Thanks,

-MSK

= --_000_F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C157BAEXCHC2corpclo_--