From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Tue Apr 18 09:29:03 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA04264 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:29:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA28263 for Entmib-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA28258 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:05:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-msg-core-crit.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-crit.cisco.com [171.71.163.10]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA28254 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy1.cisco.com (proxy1.cisco.com [192.31.7.88]) by sj-msg-core-crit.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id FAA12320 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from agni.wipinfo.soft.net (agni.wipinfo.soft.net [164.164.6.20]) by proxy1.cisco.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.5); Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:10:29 -0700 Received: from vayu.wipinfo.soft.net (vayu [192.168.200.170]) by agni.wipinfo.soft.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25825 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:37:38 +0500 (GMT) Received: from platinum.mail.wipro.com ([192.168.223.18]) by vayu.wipinfo.soft.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26394 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:39:29 +0500 (GMT) Received: from tsanth-pc ([192.135.239.161]) by platinum.mail.wipro.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with SMTP id AAA61C2 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:41:12 +0530 Message-ID: <037101bfa91a$2c40a0a0$a1ef87c0@tsanth-pc.cisco.com> From: "Santhosh Thrivikraman" To: Subject: Entity Mib Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:40:30 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_036E_01BFA95D.31127890" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-SMTP-HELO: agni.wipinfo.soft.net X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: santhosh.thrivik@wipro.com X-SMAP-Received-From: outside X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: agni.wipinfo.soft.net [164.164.6.20] Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_036E_01BFA95D.31127890 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi, I am santhosh working on an Element manager project at the cisco = development facility in India. The OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS MIB document says that objects in this mib have = been deprecated with IOS 12.0 and objects are replaced with objects = defined in the ENTITY-MIB. The document on entity mib says that it is under the mib-2 with oid 47. = I would like to know where exactly in the mib tree does the entity mib = exist. And also in IOS 12.0 do these 2 mibs divide the information or only one = of them is used Thanks and regards santhosh ------=_NextPart_000_036E_01BFA95D.31127890 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

I am santhosh working on an Element = manager=20 project at the cisco development facility in India.

The = OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS=20 MIB document says that objects in this mib have been deprecated = with IOS=20 12.0 and objects are replaced with objects defined in the=20 ENTITY-MIB.

The document = on entity mib=20 says that it is under the mib-2 with oid 47. I would like to know where = exactly=20 in the mib tree does the entity mib exist.

And also in IOS 12.0 do these 2 mibs = divide the=20 information or only one of them is used

Thanks and regards

santhosh

------=_NextPart_000_036E_01BFA95D.31127890-- From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Tue Apr 18 09:29:15 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA04274 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 09:29:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA28274 for Entmib-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id FAA28269 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiffin.cisco.com (tiffin.cisco.com [171.69.178.33]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA28265 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tsanth-pc ([192.135.239.161]) by tiffin.cisco.com (8.8.8-Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA04178 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 05:10:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <037f01bfa91a$4f337740$a1ef87c0@tsanth-pc.cisco.com> From: "Santhosh" To: Subject: Entity Mib Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:41:40 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_037C_01BFA95D.5A9F8680" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_037C_01BFA95D.5A9F8680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi, =20 I am santhosh working on an Element manager project at the cisco = development facility in India. =20 The OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS MIB document says that objects in this mib have = been deprecated with IOS 12.0 and objects are replaced with objects = defined in the ENTITY-MIB. =20 The document on entity mib says that it is under the mib-2 with oid 47. = I would like to know where exactly in the mib tree does the entity mib = exist. And also in IOS 12.0 do these 2 mibs divide the information or only one = of them is used Thanks and regards santhosh =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_037C_01BFA95D.5A9F8680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

I am santhosh working on an Element = manager=20 project at the cisco development facility in India.

The = OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS=20 MIB document says that objects in this mib have been deprecated = with IOS=20 12.0 and objects are replaced with objects defined in the=20 ENTITY-MIB.

The document = on entity mib=20 says that it is under the mib-2 with oid 47. I would like to know where = exactly=20 in the mib tree does the entity mib exist.

And also in IOS 12.0 do these 2 mibs = divide the=20 information or only one of them is used

Thanks and regards

santhosh

------=_NextPart_000_037C_01BFA95D.5A9F8680-- From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Tue Apr 18 11:21:15 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA06144 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:21:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id HAA28989 for Entmib-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id HAA28984 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:02:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA28980 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fedex.cisco.com (fedex.cisco.com [171.69.18.27]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA07575; Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cisco.com ([10.19.253.250]) by fedex.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AAH03409 (AUTH abierman); Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38FC6CDD.D50C2B89@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 07:10:37 -0700 From: Andy Bierman Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Santhosh CC: entmib@cisco.com Subject: Re: Entity Mib References: <037f01bfa91a$4f337740$a1ef87c0@tsanth-pc.cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Santhosh wrote: > > hi, > > I am santhosh working on an Element manager project at the cisco development facility in India. > > The OLD-CISCO-CHASSIS MIB document says that objects in this mib have been deprecated with IOS 12.0 and objects are replaced with objects defined in the ENTITY-MIB. > > The document on entity mib says that it is under the mib-2 with oid 47. I would like to know where exactly in the mib tree does the entity mib exist. > look at RFC 2737 > And also in IOS 12.0 do these 2 mibs divide the information or only one of them is used > this is an IETF list, not a cisco list. Ask again on an internal mailing list like cs-snmp :-) > > Thanks and regards > santhosh > > > Andy From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Mon Apr 24 04:51:03 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA29057 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 04:51:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA00772 for Entmib-outgoing; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:13:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA00767 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from samrat.cisco.com (samrat.cisco.com [192.135.241.27]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00763 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 00:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cisco.com ([192.135.240.101]) by samrat.cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA27627 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:48:48 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <3903F4DE.B612D22@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:46:46 +0530 From: Rajendra Organization: Wipro Cisco Development Centre - Bangalore, India X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: entmib@cisco.com Subject: query.. Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------12F4C7852228CC1BFE11ED66" Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------12F4C7852228CC1BFE11ED66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit hi, In the file "ENTITY-MIB.my" entityMIBTrapPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBTraps 0 } Only instances are identified with an oid element as 0. Should the above entityMIBTrapPrefix oid should be placed at 1 and not at 0 under entityMIBTraps ? Should it be corrected? Please do clearify it. regards, rajendra --------------12F4C7852228CC1BFE11ED66 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="rdk.vcf" Content-Description: Card for Rajendra Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="rdk.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit begin:vcard n:;Rajendrakumar.D.K x-mozilla-html:FALSE org:Wipro Technologies;Cisco Development Facility, Bangalore adr:;;No.8, 7th Main I Block, Koramangala;Bangalore;karnataka;560034;India version:2.1 email;internet:rdk@cisco.com title:Senior Software Engineer end:vcard --------------12F4C7852228CC1BFE11ED66-- From list-owner-entmib-outgoing@domohead.cisco.com Mon Apr 24 17:09:42 2000 Received: from domohead.cisco.com (domohead.cisco.com [171.69.2.97]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA15070 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 17:09:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA03519 for Entmib-outgoing; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA03514 for mailto-entmib@domohead.cisco.com; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flipper.cisco.com (flipper.cisco.com [171.69.63.10]) by domohead.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA03510 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sdurham-home (sdurham-dsl3.cisco.com [10.19.21.20]) by flipper.cisco.com (8.8.5-Cisco.2-SunOS.5.5.1.sun4/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA08395; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000424125735.00b1e2d0@flipper.cisco.com> X-Sender: sdurham@flipper.cisco.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:58:31 -0700 To: Rajendra , entmib@cisco.com From: "Sandra C. Durham" Subject: Re: query.. In-Reply-To: <3903F4DE.B612D22@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-entmib@cisco.com Precedence: bulk no, this is correct, and is present in all snmpv2 and beyond mibs. I can't remember the magic incantation that makes this necessary, but it is something to do with being able to convert a v2 mib to a v1 mib... sandra At 12:46 PM 4/24/00 +0530, Rajendra wrote: >hi, >In the file "ENTITY-MIB.my" > >entityMIBTrapPrefix OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { entityMIBTraps 0 } >Only instances are identified with an oid element as 0. Should the above >entityMIBTrapPrefix oid should be placed at 1 and not at 0 under >entityMIBTraps ? >Should it be corrected? >Please do clearify it. >regards, >rajendra